Conditional Assumptions
Conditional Assumptions
consists of conveying a sense of adventure in unravelling & ferreting out the origins of the patients beliefs, exploring the meaning of traumatic events
and the world. Abstract rules enabling us to get by. Rules can be designed to cover up perceived flaws
perceptions, sets goals & monitors progress towards them, evaluates & modifies their behaviour, adapts to their environment
Have the force of absolute commands rather
Inform choice of safety behaviour e.g. social phobic might strive to appear perfectly confident in front of people Leave core beliefs unchanged
(unhelpful, counter-productive)
make a mistake). Statements of contingency (If Athen B; Unless Athen B) e.g. Unless I succeed at everything then Im a failure. Drivers (Shoulds, Musts, Oughts) or else May affect both:
our behaviour (Duck out of challenges if possible) & the conclusions reached from that behaviour (That was lucky, they didnt find me out!)
If I dont fight for myself, then Ill be an easy target. If people see Im nervous, then theyll think Im pathetic. Unless I control my thoughts at all times, I am liable to go mad. I must give everything 100% all of the time or else I will fail.
I. Characteristics
Learned and abstracted. Often culturally reinforced (assumptions of the family, or wider society e.g. about mental illness). Idiosyncratic Often operate outside our awareness. Active in situations which evoke a sense of
II. Characteristics
Rigid/resistant to change. Associated with strong emotions. Excessive: overgeneralised, absolute,
extreme.
Dysfunctional: prevent the achievement of
vulnerability.
Process Issues
Assumptions are protective. Need for empathy. Convey a sense of a joint search. Can take several sessions to identify. Use the clients own language
Therapy Aims
1. Help the client notice when the rule comes
on line.
Assumptions are not necessarily true (even if they feel true). Assumptions are learned and so can be unlearned. They can be evaluated and modified.
2. Explore ways in which the assumption is
3. Formulate an alternative assumption. 4. Test out if the new rule is more helpful.
(But I couldnt do that because) NATs need observation only, UAs need observation + inference
relationships.
Childhood memories and family rules.
Implicit expectations Notice what is praised/criticised Non-verbal communication e.g. smiles, frowns
What were you told you should & should not do? What were you punished or criticised for? How did others react when you were naughty or made mistakes? What were you praised or appreciated for? What family sayings or proverbs can you remember?
then?
How would that be a problem for you? What are the implications of that? What does that tell you about what you expect from
yourself/others/life?
What does that tell you about what you should do or
be in order to:
- - feel good about yourself - - succeed in life - - be accepted/liked/loved by others
you? That the patient wont get better And if that happened, what would that mean to you? That I hadnt done my job properly And if that were true, what would it mean to you? That I was a lousy therapist And if that were true, what would it mean to you? It would show I havent really got what it takes. Sooner or later Ill be found out as a fraud
unreasonable?
How does it fail to reflect the way the world
forming it and keeping it going? Given the clients life experiences, what rules may they have developed? Good reasons: It probably made a lot of sense when you originally developed it but what about now? How do you feel when the rule works? Times of joy/elation. When do you feel best?
works, or go beyond what is realistically possible for an ordinary human being? In what ways are the rules demands excessive or exaggerated? BUT also need to ask what would be the risk of dropping this assumption?
might have:
assumption? How has it helped you in life? What risks are you avoiding by hanging on to it? What would be the risk of dropping your assumptions? Cons - What are the disadvantages of believing this assumption? In what ways does it make life difficult for you? What areas of your life has it adversely affected? Would you recommend it to someone else? If not, why not?
From DTRs Look out for times that something hits a nerve or pushes your buttons Perhaps a problem that you have encountered so far during your CBT training?
thinking
Stages: 1. Clarify assumption 2. Identify dichotomous thinking 3. Tease out the relevant continuua 4. Devise dimensional continuaa that combine both N.B. Humour can be injected into this work!
2. Illustrate this:
ALL or NOTHING & explore validity of this extreme view 3. Ask client for examples of differing degrees of severity, drawing up a continuum: ALL INTERMEDIATE NOTHING
100%
0%PERFECT______________________100% 0% WORTH_______________________100%
0%
Attractiveness
100
Very fat
This is because they allow you to enjoy the payoffs of the old without its disadvantages They will be based on an adults ability to understand how the world works & to take different circumstances into account. Important to retain what the client values most But may capture the essence in a shorthand form
Does this rule help me to achieve these goals? Is this the best strategy for getting what I want out of life? What are the payoffs & disadvantages?
to do this?
E.g. that I dont have to be witty and smart all the time, that its okay to be a little anxious, etc
I. Re-evaluating assumptions
Identify someone who appears to have the
same rule:
How accurate do you think it is for her? Do you agree with her rule? If not, how would you view it? What rule would you like her to have? How might this apply to you?
Would you want to pass this rule on to your children? If not, what would you prefer their rule to be? For example: Your child has failed an exam. Would you want him to see himself as a failure? What would you like him to believe? How could you help him see things differently? How could this apply to you?
What rule might she have? Do you think her rule is accurate? How would you live life differently if you had this rule, too? How might this rule be relevant to you? What makes it OK for her but not for you?
like it, does that mean its bad? (i.e. you are
what you are, regardless of whether others like you)
there days when you feel warm towards them & others when they drive you mad? What accounts for these differences?
(your mood & others behaviour influence judgements, opinions change day to day more helpful to judge actions rather than people)
Assumptions flashcard
I hold the belief that It is understandable that I hold this belief
because
The payoffs of obeying this rule are However the belief is unreasonable
because
It is also unhelpful because Given that I have held this belief for some
time, it will take time to change it. What I need to do is: (action plan)
as the oldest I was expected to set a shining example. The payoffs of obeying this rule are that I have achieved a great deal in my life However, the belief is unreasonable because noone could fulfil all its terms all & no-one is perfect It is also unhelpful because it sets an impossible standard that causes excessive stress, misery and sometimes poor performance A more helpful belief is I get pleasure from doing well thats fine. But Im only human & I sometimes make mistakes thats inevitable
time, it will take time to change. What I need to do is: Keep this card handy! Watch out for signs of stress (old ways) Use thought record sheet to deal with NATs Learn to say no practice! Delegate, at home & work Take time for myself (being not doing) Focus on what I achieve not what I fail to do
How might you benefit from acting as if you believe the new rule 100%? What might you do differently over the next week? What positive/negative things might happen? How could you manage these?
Overall aims
We are not aiming to get rid of unhelpful
Reduce their intensity Raise the threshold for their activation Recognise them when they come on-line Consider options (choice) about how to respond Internal attentional shift rather than belief change? (increased awareness) This is why we end therapy with blueprints
accessed
Providing alternative beliefs/memories (e.g.
discussions with my therapist, behavioural experiments) which compete with the original, less helpful beliefs Therapy as constructive rather than rationalist
behaviour So far have only considered verbal discussion techniques to increase flexibility Behavioural Experiments can be constructed (collaboratively) to test old assumptions or to evaluate new assumptions
To be continued
What was your experience on a personal level? What did you discover about yourself? Where would you like to take this? What could you do now? What was your experience at a professional level? What did you observe as a therapist? What did you learn about CBT practice? What were the practical implications for work with clients? (what? when? who/ how?)
Key references
Beck, J.S. (1995) Cognitive Therapy: Basics &
Acknowledgements
This workshop is prepared with acknowledgement to Dr Melanie Fennell and the Oxford Cognitive Therapy Centre Thanks also to Dr Sarah Corrie, CNWL
beyond. Guildford, New York (Ch. 10 & 11) Brewin, C.R. (2006). Understanding cognitivebehaviour therapy: A retrieval competition account. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44,765-784. Fennell, M.J.V. (1989) Depression. In K. Hawton et al (Eds) Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychiatric problems. Oxford University Press For clients: Greenberger, D. & Padesky, C.A. (1995) Mind over mood. Guildford, New York (Ch. 9) Fennell (1997) Overcoming low self-esteem (Ch.7)