Coding in Qualitative Research
Coding in Qualitative Research
A code is a label that describes the content of a piece of text. For example, in the sentence:
“Pigeons attacked me and stole my sandwich.”
You could use “pigeons” as a code. This code simply describes that the sentence involves pigeons.
So, building onto this, qualitative data coding is the process of creating and assigning codes to categorize
data extracts. You’ll then use these codes later down the road to derive themes and patterns for your
qualitative data analysis.
Coding is the process of labeling and organizing your qualitative data to identify different
themes and the relationships between them.
For example : When coding customer feedback, you assign labels to words or phrases that represent
important (and recurring) themes in each response. These labels can be words, phrases, or numbers.
Use words or short phrases, since they’re easier to remember, skim, and organize.
Coding qualitative research to find common themes and concepts is part of thematic analysis.
Thematic analysis extracts themes from text by analyzing the word and sentence structure.
The deductive approach can save time and help guarantee that your areas of interest are coded.
But you also need to be careful of bias; when you start with predefined codes, you have a bias
as to what the answers will be. Make sure you don’t miss other important themes by focusing
too hard on proving your own hypothesis.
If you add a new code, split an existing code into two, or change the description of a code, make
sure to review how this change will affect the coding of all responses. Otherwise, the same
responses at different points in the survey could end up with different codes.
Inductive coding is an iterative process, which means it takes longer and is more thorough than
deductive coding. But it also gives you a more complete, unbiased look at the themes
throughout your data.
1. In vivo coding
Using of a participants’ own words, rather than your interpretation of the data. In other words, you use
direct quotes from participants as your codes. By doing this, you’ll avoid trying to infer meaning, rather
staying as close to the original phrases and words as possible.
2. Process coding
Next up, there’s process coding, which makes use of action-based codes. Action-based codes are codes
that indicate a movement or procedure. These actions are often indicated by gerunds (words ending in
“-ing”) – for example, running, jumping or singing.
Process coding is useful as it allows you to code parts of data that aren’t necessarily spoken, but that are
still imperative to understanding the meaning of the texts.
3. Descriptive coding
Descriptive coding aims to summarize extracts by using a single word or noun that encapsulates the
general idea of the data. These words will typically describe the data in a highly condensed manner,
which allows the researcher to quickly refer to the content.
For example, a descriptive code could be “food” when coding a video clip that involves a group
of people discussing what they ate throughout the day, or “cooking” when coding an image
showing the steps of a recipe.
4. Structural coding
Structural coding involves labelling and describing specific structural attributes of the data. Generally, it
includes coding according to answers to the questions of “who”, “what”, “where”, and “how”, rather
than the actual topics expressed in the data.
Let’s take a look at a practical example
Question: What is a pet for you?
Answer: Bella is my best friend. When I’m at home I like to sit on the floor with her and roll her ball
across the carpet for her to fetch and bring back to me. I love my dog.
In this set, we could code Bella as “who”, dog as “what”, home and floor as “where”, and roll her ball as
“how”.
5. Values coding
Finally, values coding involves coding that relates to the participant’s worldviews. Typically, this type of
coding focuses on excerpts that reflect the values, attitudes, and beliefs of the participants.
useful for research exploring cultural values and intrapersonal and experiences and actions.
2. Pattern Coding
With Pattern coding, you group similarly coded excerpts under one overarching code to describe a
pattern.
3. Focused coding / selective coding
With Focused coding, you create a finalized set of codes and categories from your first coding pass
(often from “open coding”). You then re-code the qualitative data according to this final code list with
the intent to not deviate from it. In comparison to an initial “open coding” pass which allows for
emergent and changing codes, focused coding is a method where you don’t intend to change the code
list any further.
4. Axial coding
With axial coding, you relate codes or categories to one another. You’re looking for relationships and
links between what you found in earlier rounds of coding.
5. Theoretical coding
With theoretical coding, you conceptualize a hypothesis of a theoretical framework through sorting and
organizing codes. You structure the codes and categories that emerged from qualitative data into a
theory.
6. Elaborative coding
With elaborative coding, you apply a theory from a previous research study and observe whether or not
your current codes
and categories relate. You can think about it as elaborating on pre-existing theories.
7.Longitudinal coding
With longitudinal coding, you organize your existing codes and categories in a way that enables you to
compare them over time.
8. Content analysis coding
With content analysis, you examine and understand the content of textual data. There are two types of
methodological approaches to content analysis: quantitative content analysis and qualitative content
analysis.
Learning Task for Thematic Analysis lesson
Instruction: Choose only one interview question and answer then label the answer line by line the
according to our lesson in Thematic Analysis.
Interview Question: What are some things that we should consider in writing research questions?
Answer: Many qualitative researchers see a question as a beginning point for their research. Once a
satisfactory question is in place, a study can begin. A research question does fulfill this function, but I
propose here that much more is involved in creating and using research questions in qualitative studies.
The reflective and interrogative processes required for developing research questions can give shape
and direction to a study in ways that are often underestimated.
Good questions do not necessarily produce good research, but poorly conceived or constructed
questions will likely create problems that affect all subsequent stages of a study. Ultimately, the quality
of the initial questions impacts whether or not a study is approved by a research committee, published,
or funded.