Non-Compact Sections and Examples of Flexural Analysis
Non-Compact Sections and Examples of Flexural Analysis
(Introduction to Non-compact
sections)
Slides prepared by: Joe Davidson B. Guzman
Bending strength of non-compact shapes
Most standard I-shaped and C-shapes are compact. A few are non-compact
because of the flange width-thickness ratio.
In General, A non-compact beam may fail by:
1. Lateral-Torsional Buckling,
2. Flange local buckling
3. Web local buckling
Any of these types of failure can be either the elastic range or the inelastic
range. The strength corresponding to each of these three limit states must be
computed, and the smallest value will control.
If the shape is non-compact because of the flange, the nominal strength will be
the smaller of the strengths to flange local buckling and lateral torsional
buckling.
a. Flange local buckling:
𝒑 , there is no FLB
If 𝒑 𝒓, the flange is non compact, and
b. Lateral-torsional buckling:
Using
I. If 𝒃 𝒑 there is no LTB
II. 𝒑 𝒃 𝒓 there is inelastic LTB, and
12.5𝑀
𝐶 = (𝑅 ) ≤ 3.0 𝐴𝐼𝑆𝐶 𝑒𝑞. 𝐹1 − 1
2.5𝑀 + 3𝑀 + 4𝑀 + 3𝑀
𝑹𝒎 = 1.0 for doubly symmetric cross sections (sucj as W-shapes) and singly
symmetric shapes (such as channels) subject to single-curvature bending
𝑰𝒚𝒄 𝟐
𝑹𝒎 = 𝟎. 𝟓 + 𝟐( ) for singly symmetric shapes subject to reverse
𝑰𝒚
curvature bending
Different values for 𝒃
A value of 1.0 is always conservative, regardless of beam configuration or loading. But in some
cases, it may be excessively conservative!