0% found this document useful (0 votes)
240 views5 pages

Babloo Pasi Excise Bail

1) Babloo Chaudhari has applied for regular bail as he has been in judicial custody since September 5th, 2022 for a case under the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act. 2) He claims to be innocent and falsely implicated in the case due to local politics. No incriminating evidence was recovered from him. 3) Staying in custody longer will cause him irreparable loss, so he asks the court to release him on bail until the trial concludes.

Uploaded by

Nawin Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
240 views5 pages

Babloo Pasi Excise Bail

1) Babloo Chaudhari has applied for regular bail as he has been in judicial custody since September 5th, 2022 for a case under the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act. 2) He claims to be innocent and falsely implicated in the case due to local politics. No incriminating evidence was recovered from him. 3) Staying in custody longer will cause him irreparable loss, so he asks the court to release him on bail until the trial concludes.

Uploaded by

Nawin Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Page |1

(Accused is in custody)

IN THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL JUDGE(EXCISE),

SAHARSA.

Sonvarsa Raj P.S. CASE NO. - 07/2023

UNDER SECTION 30(a) OF BIHAR EXCISE AND PROHIBITION

ACT-2022.

IN THE MATTER OF:-

STATE

Vs.

Babloo Chaudhari & Other ………….Accused

The humble petition of bail

on behalf of accused

1.Babloo Chaudhari aged about

years

S/O- Late Bhola Chaudhari

Resident of village – Sonvarsa

Raj, P.S.- Sonvarsa Raj, Dist.-

Saharsa
Page |2

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:-


1. That this is an application for grant of regular bail to the accused

petitioner who is in judicial custody since 05/09/2022 in connection with

Saur Bazar P.S. case no.- 503/2022 instituted under section 30(a) of Bihar

Excise and Prohibition Act-2016.

2. That the petitioner has not preferred such an application for anticipatory

bail or regular bail earlier either before this court or the Hon’ble Patna High

Court.

3. That the petitioner has a criminal history as under-.

4. That the petitioner is on bail in aforesaid case

5. That the petitioner is quite innocent and committed no offence much less

the offence alleged in the FIR and has been falsely implicated in this case

due to grudge, dirty party politics which is prevailing in side of village.

6. That the above noted FIR has been registered on the false and frivolous

complaint of the informant. And the applicant is law abiding, God Fearing

and having fullest faith in the rule of Law.

7. That nothing incriminating article has been recovered from the possession

of the accused/ petitioner.


Page |3

8. That on perusal of FIR your Honour would find that it is allegation to the

petitioner that 5 Ltrs. Desi wine in Plastic container has been recovered from

the possession of the petitioner. This is totally false and misleading fact. The

petitioner was going to home and the police knowingly detained the

petitioner with an allegation that this wine container is yours.

9. That the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury to his goodwill,

health and mental peace, if the police arrest the applicant in the false case

filed against him.

10. That the Indian legislature respects for the personal liberty of the citizen

and believes in the old- age principle that an individual is presumed to be

innocent till she is found guilty by the Court. The personal liberty is the most

important fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution of India.

Deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment a punishment unless

it is required to insure that an accused will not stand his trial when called

upon. The courts owe more than verbal respect to the principle that

punishment begins after conviction and every man is deemed to be innocent

until duly tried and duly found guilty.

11. That the petitioner is judicial custody in the present false and frivolous

case since 05/01/2022. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the

applicant in jail any longer. The applicant accused should not be in kept in

judicial custody as pre trial punishment measures.


Page |4

12. That the petitioner is not a previous convict. The petitioner is permanent

resident of Saharsa at the above noted address and is having his roots in

society. There is no chance of applicant tempering the evidence or

threatening the witness or to flee/abscond from justice, if released on bail.

13. That the petitioner is also ready to comply with all the conditions as

prescribed under section 437 of Cr.P.C. or any other condition as deem fit

and proper by this Hon’ble court, while granting the Bail.

14. That there are other grounds also which is raised at the time of hearing

of bail application by your Honour’s permission.

It is, therefore, prayed


that Your Honour may
graciously be pleased to
enlarge the petitioner on
bail of proper surety.
AND/OR

Pass such an order(s) as


Your Honour may deems fit
and proper.

And for this the petitioner shall ever pray.

Petitioner,

through Advocate.
Page |5

IN THE COURT OF THE SPECIAL JUDGE (EXCISE),

SAHARSA.

Sonvarsa Raj P.S. CASE NO. - 07/2023

STATE Vs. Babloo Chaudhari ………….Accused

AFFIDAVIT

I, Santosh Kumar Chaudhari aged about 32 years S/O- Late Bhola


Pasi, resident of village and P.S.– Sonvarsa Raj, Dist.– Saharsa do hereby
and solemnly affirm and state as follows:

1. That I am brother of the Petitioner and also well acquainted with this
facts and circumstances of the case.
2. That I am competent to swear this affidavit.
3. That I am gone through the contents of the bail petition bearing above
case no. and heard translate into Hindi and have understood the same.
4. That the statements made in the application are true to the best of my
knowledge and based on information derived from the records of the
case, which I believe to be true.

Deponent.

You might also like