2012 Burning Thoughts
2012 Burning Thoughts
2012
I. Introduction……….………………………..…………..………..…….....3
A. Burning Man
B. Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
C. Moving Forward
V. Gradual Growth………..……………….…….……………..………...28
A. Ticket Sales
B. Clean-Up
C. Other Potential Issues
VIII. References………………………………..…………………….......36
A. BURNING MAN
With over 50,000 participants, Burning Man is the largest permitted event on the public
lands for all the federal agencies. The combination art festival, social event, and
experiment in community living starts Monday before Labor Day and lasts 8 days.
Since the first ‘burn’ on the Black Rock Desert in 1990, it has continued there every year
since except in 1997 when it was on nearby private land. While all users impact the
desert, as the largest user group, Burning Man has the most significant presence.
Upon receipt of a permit application from Black Rock City LLC, the Winnemucca BLM
began the federally mandated analysis of potential impacts of the event. The results
were published in an Environmental Assessment (EA) 2. With the ‘Finding of No
3,4
Significant Impact’ (FONSI) , the BLM issued a 5-year Special Recreation Permit
(SRP) for Burning Man 2006-10 5. Upon review of the expired the EA and a public
comment period, the permit was extended for BM 2011 6,7.
C. MOVING FORWARD
9-11
Refer to the 2006-08 Stipulation Monitoring Reports for detailed methods, results
and recommendations.
SURFACE DEGRADATION
Dunes are not new to the Black Rock Desert but various users groups have noted an
increase in dunes size and coverage over the last dozen years.
EA & STIPULATIONS
1. The dunes and potential link to the event acknowledged in the Burning Man EA
2. To facilitate cumulative impact studies, two alternating sites for Black Rock
City
DESCRIPTION of PROPOSED ACTION & ALTERNATIVES
Overview of Alternatives
Two sites—Rotating between two sites would potentially allow wind eroded areas additional time between uses for recovery
associated with transport of playa sediments by surface waters versus creation of a second site with elevated levels of residual
debris when compared to overall playa area. The use of two sites would also facilitate the joint BLM/Desert Research Institute
study to determine impacts to the playa surface from a single event. This study will begin in 2006.
2. Historical documentation
The ‘Sand Dunes on the Black Rock Desert’ website is a comprehensive attempt to chronicle the history of dune appearance
14
http://sites.google.com/site/blackrockdunes/
GPS confirmed that the large track visible from the left bottom corner of the photo
trending towards Trego Mountain is coincident with the BM 2007 perimeter fence.
Photo credit: Black Rock dunes site 14
A large and persistent dune formed from dust accumulated against the the BM 2007
perimeter fence. When BM 2008 moved back to Site B, the fence dune crossed Black
Rock City and snagged bikes, golf carts and pedestrians traveling between the
Esplanade and Open Playa.
BM 2007 saw the worst dust storms that can be recalled in a decade or more. Most likely
this - in combination with near drought conditions for several years, are the main contributing
factors to this particularly large dune. The dune remained prominent on aerial imagery for 4
years until it was bladed during BM 2011 clean-up efforts.
Environmental Consequences
4.2.1. Playa Sediments & Vegetation
Dust storms during or immediately after the event would create sediment windrows along the perimeter fence. Dragging or
grading during the cleanup phase would eliminate these windrows. Event stipulations require watering of dust areas thus
reducing the amount of material potentially available for wind movement.
SEPTEMBER 2007
Like all dust that accumulates along structures, the BM 2007 perimeter fence was knocked
down after the event as shown below.
During the Spring ‘08 inspection of the BM07 site, it was noted that the dunes not only
survived but seemed to have thrived. The perimeter fence location was defined by a
series of dunes on either side of the fence.
BM 2008
In June 2008, these unique dunes with a shape of these dunes resembling small
mountain ranges with peaks and valleys were noted along the section crossing the BM
2008 Open Playa.
The same location was re-inspected in October 2011 with similar observations.
MODIS imagery17 shows the Quinn River flow on the desert. Overlaying Black Rock
City on a 2011 MODIS image shows that the area of interest lies along the edge of the
Quinn River flow. This is not surprising as the flow is visible is other Black Rock City
images18.
This image showing Quinn River flow is featured on the covers of the Burning Man
Operating plan 20,21 and BLM Special Stipulations documents 22-26
Photo Credit: Will Rogers
Visible in this BM 2009 image is the BM 2007 fence dune and an imprint of the BM 2008
city streets.
EA & STIPULATIONS
There is not a stipulation per se against dunes and footprints but both are indicative of
surface degradation and compaction. As discussed later, the effects many on the
desert have experienced suggest these impacts have exceeded the limits of acceptable
change.
The observed surface degradation evidenced by transient dunes, the BM 2007 fence
dune and imprinted city streets merit further exploration. Playa dynamics studies
could aid the BLM in adopting policies that would minimize further impacts, and
restore and preserve desert activities for all user groups.
1. Remote imagery
Imagery - rather than on the ground efforts, is necessary to inventory dune and dune
fields. Imagery could be obtained from private (Burning Man Earth, Google Earth
and/or GeoEye) or government sources (Navy, USGS).
2. GIS Modeling
Through image analysis and GIS modeling, a correlation between dune development
wind and water patterns, soil types, visitor use and other factors might be made.
In 2007, decomposed gravel (DG) was introduced as a burn pad material. Despite
efforts to pick up the gravel with backhoe much remains after the event. An unknown
element in the gravel also stained the desert orange. Upon re-inspection in October
2011, both DG and the orange stains remain at monitored art burn sites.
BM 2007
Note the orange discoloration from the decomposed gravel burn pad
1. Decomposed gravel directly on the playa; fire not elevated above surface
Art Burns, the burning of larger art structures including “The Man”, would be permitted by BRC. Permitted burns would use
corrugated metal sheets or fire blankets overlain with sand under the burning objects to eliminate surface scarring.
While the following photos document one particular site, gravel and orange discoloration
remained at many site.
These discolorations negate the need for accurate GPS navigation as the orange spots
could be detected from hundreds of feet away. Close view of this area shows the
pattern of discoloration matches that of the previous inspection photos recording the
same observation. GPS also confirmed this to be the site of the large art burn.
Upon re-inspection in October 2011, these spots and others that have been carefully
monitored with gps-photos have persisted 4 years and counting.
Many more areas were found with the same type telling signs of decomposed gravel.
Although no monitoring was done in BM 2009 and BM 2010, presumably these
correspond to art and community burn barrel sites. The desert is being littered with
and stained by the same decomposed gravel intended to protect it.
Encourage the use of materials for burn pads that are more easily removed. In the
past, numerous types of materials including wallboard, corrugated metal and Kevlar
have been effective.
2006 Temple
Corrugated metal and concrete blocks
burn pad
DG does not appear to be a reliable material. It is hard to contain and an unknown element
has created lasting stains. Its components may vary from year to year and continue to
cause unpredictable impacts.
Burn platforms were not required until 2000. Some past monitoring has been done for
art burn sites and fire pits in 1994-5. These could be re-visited to follow up on
experimental methods used to recover baked and scarred sites.
‘It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for
the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.’
BLM 29
The BLM mission and various federal policies acknowledge recreation as a legitimate
use of the public lands and make it clear it is never an option to close the public lands
to recreational users. Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) 1 is a management approach
which also recognizes both natural processes and humans inevitably have impacts. It
aims to inventory existing conditions using quantitative measures, set standards for
desired amounts of change and create management policies to preserve conditions
within those limits. While short-term, measurable impacts have been addressed by
Burning Man and BLM, the larger, cumulative impacts evident by the loss of
opportunities unique to the desert exceeds the limits of acceptable change.
Dunes are caused by the interaction of wind, soil, weather and obstructions; however, it
is clear that the human presence also plays a significant part. As we travel across
the desert, we contribute to their formation by breaking the desert surface and
increasing fugitive dust. We also provide structures and barriers against which the dust
accumulates and forms dunes.
B. MEASURABLE IMPACTS
Six months after the event BLM and BM staff and volunteers traverse 65 plots through
the randomly chosen in Black Rock City. Non-native materials are collected and
catalogued. Debris levels have always been below allowed 1 square foot per acre.
These ‘acceptable’ amounts of debris have become the celebrated mark of success by
Burning Man, the media and BLM alike. However, they were never intended to
become the SOLE criteria for permit compliance.
Potential oil drips from vehicles31 and debris via the annual BLM inspections32-35 are
fairly easy to establish a baseline and monitor for change over time. Larger changes
such as surface degradation and compaction offer a much larger challenge to measure.
Evident, however, are the effects of these impacts. Dunes and dune fields have
increased enough to warrant safety warnings, to appear on aerial imagery, and to
inconvenience vehicles and pedestrians during the event.
The unusually flat surface and open space provides for activities that depend on the
desert. The EA addresses this issue –
4.2.3. Recreation
Physical disturbances, such as pitting or rutting of the area surface, or debris left from the event could leave the playa in a
less than ideal condition for other uses. Having a flat playa surface is critical to land sailors and land speed record attempts.
2. Landsailing
The surface is no longer smooth enough for dirt boats. Many have been forced to move
elsewhere.
3. Rocketry
Fugitive dust is worse every year, particularly at the September AeroPac37 and BALLS38
events which are downwind from the Burning Man clean-up. There are limited locations
in the US to obtain a 100,000-foot FAA flight waiver.
Burning Man attendance has increased nearly every year since arriving on the Black
Rock in 1990. Based on past numbers and recent ticket sales, this trend is expected to
continue. This presents the largest challenge for Burning Man organizers to date. To
keep the event manageable, a sensible approach to control growth gradually has been
adopted.
Burning Man is the largest user group on the desert. The second largest group on
the desert with a special recreation permit is the rocketeers whose 3-4 launches per
year attract about 500 people total. This is less than 1% of Burning Man’s peak
population during the week and does not consider increased visitation the event has
brought year-round.
* Burning Man did not take place on the public lands of the Black Rock Desert in 1997, but on adjacent private land.
Although the previous chart shows Black Rock city population for the week, the event
has a presence on the desert much longer than 8 days.
2. Visibility
World- and nation-wide publicity the event has brought to the Black Rock has attracted
many to the area year-round.
4.2.3. Recreation
The event has introduced thousands of people from throughout the world to the Black Rock area either through participation
in the event and/or increased media coverage associated with the event, which may have long-term impacts to the recreational
environment in the area.
C. LEAVE NO TRACE
Burning Man organizers promote Leave No Trace, an ethic introduced to Burning Man
by Mike Bilbo, BLM Outdoor Recreation Planner. When the event was significantly
smaller this made sense. Although a majority of the participants are conscientious and
teams do remain a full month to clean-up, can 50,000+ people traveling to a one-road
in/one-road out event really Leave No Trace41? Is a ‘Tread Lightly’42 ethic even
appropriate?
In preparing the BM 2006-10 EA, both Burning Man and BLM mutually determined
50,000 the maximum limit for event and site management. This limit was reached or
exceeded every year of the EA. Unlike the previous 5-year EA which set a limit of
50,000 for the entire permit period, the exact limit each year will be determined by the
authoring officer of the permit.
Original press releases reported Burning Man LLC had proposed for 2012 is a
population of limit of 55,000 with an annual 6% increase each year 8. The Preliminary
EA references only numbers of 58,000 and 70,000 with set limits ‘to be determined.’
therefore, number throughout this report vary as do the sources from the which the
information is quoted. While the figures for population limits have not been determined,
what is clear is that the event will grow gradually from more than the previous 50,000 to
nearly 70,000. The key is gradual growth which is intended to ease the
implementations of any necessary changes.
Will Roger is one of the board of directors that helps run the event. He spoke about wanting to grow the event recently, but
doing so at a slow pace. “For everyone concerned, slow growth is better than big growth“ 44
A. TICKET SALES
Ticket sales is the first opportunity to control the city population and currently the largest
issue Burning Man LLC has dealt with to date. 2011 was the first year tickets sold out.
A supply-and-demand market made the previously assumed 5% no-show/donation rate
invalid. The peak population in 2011 was 51,515. In 2012, in an attempt to control
demand and scalping, a lottery system was employed. Despite the best intentions, it
backfired when many who actively participate to build the city infrastructure and theme
45, 46
camps were left without tickets . The last 10,000 tickets are to be distributed by a
B. CLEAN-UP
from 2008 Inspection Memo 32
…There were some aspects of the 2008 cleanup effort that raise concerns about the 2009 event and future events. Specifically:
• The level of residual debris within the City has risen 100% since 2006 and was at 60% of the standard this year.
• The number of plots that exceed the standard doubled since 2007 and two plots were more than twice the standard.
• The number of items for the most used portions of the event area (the City and the Playa) has substantially increased during
the past two years.
The area occupied by the City has grown by almost 32% in the past two years.
The increased population and increased City and Event area continues to lead to substantial increases in the area the cleanup
crew is required to cover. While outreach efforts to the population of the Event by Black Rock City, LLC (BRC) have resulted
in increased appreciation and effort by individual participants during the event, the data collected over the past several years
suggests that future efforts by the “Playa Restoration” crew will need to be increased to keep up with the changes in the event.
Given the size and nature of event activities, and BLM permit fees exceeding $1.4
million, the event commands much public visibility. Past efforts have focused on law
enforcement rather the special recreation permit stipulations that ensure both visitor
safety and resource protection. To meet challenges presented by the proposed
population increase, it is critical BLM to closely monitor, document and enforce the
permit they issue.
The use of geospatial tools was explored for real-time monitoring during BM 2006 and
2007. GPS-cameras greatly improved the efficiency of the staff allowing organized
studies to address concerns. In 2008, monitoring was contracted to the former BLM
employee who developed and led monitoring efforts the previous 2 years. Reports
published for these 3 years concluded that short-term impacts were minimal, but
9-11
cumulative, long-term impacts addressed by the EA were ignored . Monitoring data
for BM 2009-11 was collected by internal BLM staff and volunteers but results were
never compiled or published.
B. ENFORCEMENT
The population limit of 50,000 participants was closely approached or exceeded every
year of the permit. Most years lacked an action plan and reporting procedures should
Burning Man tickets exceed 50,000 people during the event. After the event, the
consequences for failing to stay below the limit were none.
With the recent ticket fiasco, many have inquired about the required distance for
camping on the desert but outside Black Rock City. With a potentially large numbers of
campers on the desert outside the provisions provided by the Burning Man
infrastructure, operating plan and permit the potential for resource damage and concern
for visitor safety is high. It is NOT an option to close desert to non-ticket holders Labor
Day weekend. BLM has faced similar issues in the past, but this issue has now been
brought to forth even more so.
These ‘organized groups’ could and (maybe) should apply for a SRP but the reality is
1. Burning Bush
In 2004, artists gathered on the Blue Wing playa for weekend. The organizers were
encouraged to work with BLM to obtain a permit but eventually, the event disappeared.
2. 4th of J’Playa
For many years, BLM has yet to be able to locate ‘organizers’ of the now annual 4th of
J’Playa event that attracts thousands to the Black Rock.
1. The Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) System for Wilderness Planning, George H. Stankey et al, USFS, 1985.
2. Environmental Assessment: Burning Man 2006 – 2010, Special Recreation Permit , NV-020-06-EA-11, Black Rock
Desert–High Rock Canyon Emigrant Trails National Conservation Area, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, June 2006.
3. Finding of No Significant Impact: Burning Man 2006 – 2010, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, June 2006.
4. Decision Record: Burning Man 2006 – 2010, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, June 2006.
5. Special Recreation Permit: Burning Man 2006 – 2010, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, June 2006.
6. Decision Record: Burning Man 2011, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, March 2011.
7. Special Stipulations: Burning Man Event 2011, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, March 2011.
8. Burning Man Organizers Ask For 20k More Burners, Reno Gazette Journal, 2011
9. 2008 Stipulation Monitoring Report, LM Levy, Spatial-Ed.com
10. 2007 Stipulation Monitoring Report, LM Levy, Spatial-Ed.com
11. 2006 Stipulation Monitoring Report, LM Levy, Spatial-Ed.com
12. Playa Surface Features as Indicators of Environment, Proceedings 1970 Playa Lake Symposium. Texas Tech University,
Neal, James T., 1970, posted at "http://www.lib.ttu.edu/playa/ text/playa9.htm
13. Black Rock Travel Advisory, M. Bilbo, April 2000.
14. Black Rock Dunes site, C Brooks, http://sites.google.com/site/blackrockdunes/
15. Northwestern Nevada: Physical Processes and Aquatic Life, Adams, Kenneth D. and Donald W. Sada, Black Rock Playa,
Desert Research Institute, May 2010.
16. Burning Man 2008 image, Burning Man Earth, posted at http://www.gigapan.org/gigapans/15019
17. MODIS imagery FAQ, from http://lance.nasa.gov/imagery/rapid-response/frequently-asked-questions/
18. Burning Man Organizers Ask For 20k More Burners, http://unofficialnetworks.com/burning-man-organizers-20k-burners-
38595/, August 29, 2011.
19. How Wet was the Black Rock this year, Spatial-Ed.com, July 2011.
20. 2006 Burning Man Operating Plan, Burning Man LLC, 2006.
21. 2011 Burning Man Operating Plan, Burning Man LLC, 2011.
22. Special Stipulations: Burning Man Event 2010, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, 2010.
23. Special Stipulations: Burning Man Event 2009, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, 2009.
24. Special Stipulations: Burning Man Event 2008, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, 2008.
25. Special Stipulations: Burning Man Event 2007, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, 2007.
26. Special Stipulations: Burning Man Event 2006, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, June 2006.
27. Burning Man 2009 image, Burning Man Earth, posted at http://gigapan.org/gigapans/fullscreen/3431
28. Personal Communication with Mike Bilbo, Nov 2011
29. BLM Mission Statement, http://www.blm.gov/natacq/BLMMissHistExc.pdf
30. Preliminary Analysis of Playa Bedforms of the Black Rock Desert, Washoe County, Nevada, D. Craig Young, Jr.,
GeoOpt Research, Inc., July 2000.
31. Oil drip Study, http://www.burningman.com/preparation/event_survival/oildrips.html, 2003.
32. Inspection memo: Burning Man 2009, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, 2010.
33. Inspection memo: Burning Man 2008, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, 2009.
34. Inspection memo: Burning Man 2007, BLM Winnemucca Field Office, 2008.
This report is a volunteer effort to summarize conversations with many involved (event
attendees, managers and philosophers), and to extend previous monitoring efforts for an
event and area that continue to intrigue. As always, responsibility for all content lies solely
with the author.