TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 OBJECTIVES
2.0 THEORY BACKGROUND
3.0 EQUIPMENTS
4.0 PROCEDURES
5.0 RESULTS
6.0 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
7.0 DISCUSSION
8.0 CONCLUSION
1.0 OBJECTIVE

1. To determine permeability of soils of intermediate and low permeability

(less than 10-4 m/s), i.e. silts and clays.
2. TO describe the general accepted practice to determine the coefficient of
permeability of silts and clays.
3. To identify the relationship between permeability and pore size of the fine
grained soils.
4. To measure the coefficient of permeability of silts and clays.
2.0 THEORY BACKGROUND

In the falling head test a relatively short sample is connected to a standpipe

which provides both the head of water and the means of measuring the quantity
of water flowing through the sample. Several standpipes of different diameters
are normally available from which can be selected the diameter most suitable for
the type of material being tested.

In permeability tests on clays, much higher hydraulic gradients than are normally
used with sands can be applied, and are often necessary to induce any
measurable flow. The cohesion of clays provides resistance to failure by piping at
gradients of up to several hundred, even under quite low confining or surcharge
pressures. Dispersive clays however are very susceptible to erosion at much
lower gradient.

The falling head principle can be applied to an undisturbed sample in a sampling

tube and to a sample in an oedometer consolidation cell. The equation used in
determine the permeability of fine grained soils is given in Eqn (1).

aL  h 
Permeability, k  log e  1  ………..Eqn (1)
A(t 2  t1 )  h2 

The time difference (t2-t1) can be expressed as the elapsed time, t (minutes). The
heights h1 and h2 and the length, L are expressed in millimetres, and the areas A
and a in square millimetres. Eqn (1) then becomes Eqn (2).

aL  h 
Permeability, k  log e  1  ( mm / s ) ………..Eqn (2)
Ax 60t  h2 
To convert natural logarithms to ordinary (base 10) logarithms, multiply by 2.303.
If k is epxressed in m/s, the above equation becomes Eqn (3).

2.303aL  h 
Permeability , k  log10  1  ( m / s ) ………..Eqn (3)
1000 xAx 60t  h2 

Where: a = area of cross-section of standpipe

tube,
A = area of cross section of sample
h1 = heights of water above datum in
standpipe at time t1
h2 = heights of water above datum in
standpipe at time t2
L = heights of sample
t = elapsed time in minutes
3.0 EQUIPMENTS

1. Permeameter cell, comprising:

Cell body, with cutting edge (core cutter), 100 mm diameter and 130 mm
long.
Perforated base plate with straining rods and wing nuts.
Top clamping plate.
Connecting tube and fittings.

Figure 1: Compaction permeameter

(Courtesy of ELE International, 2007)
4.0 PROCEDURES

1. Assemble apparatus,
a. The apparatus is set up as shown in Figure 2. The volume of water
passing through a sample of low permeability is quite small and a
continuous supply of de-aired water is not necessary, but the
reservoir supplying the de-airing tank should be filled with distilled
or de-ionised water
2. Calibrate manometer tubes,
a. The areas of cross-section of the three manometer tubes should
be determined as follows for each tube:
i. The tube is filled with water up to a known mark near the
top of the scale, observed to the nearest mm.
ii. Water is runoff from the tube into a weighted beaker, until
the level in the tube has fallen by about 500mm or more.
iii. The new water level is read on the scale, to the nearest
mm.
iv. The beaker containing water from the tube (weighings
should be to the nearest 0.01g) is weighted.
v. The diameter of the manometer can be calculated as
follows:

1000m w
diameter, a  mm2
h1  h2

If mw = mass of water (g),

h1 = initial level in tube (mm),
h2 = final level in tube (mm),
 A = area of cross-section of tube (mm2)
vi. The measurements is repeated two or three times for each
tube, and average the results.
vii.
3. Prepare cell,
a. The cell is dismantled.
b. The cell body is checked clean and dry, and weighted to the
nearest 0.1g.
c. The mean internal diameter (D) and length (L) is measured to the
nearest 0.5mm.
4. Prepare sample,
a. Undisturbed sample can be taken by means of core cutter.
b. The sample is make sure that have a tight fit in the body and there
are no cavities around the perimeter through which water could
pass.
5. Assemble cell
6. Connect cell
7. Saturate and de-air sample
8. Fill manometer system
9. Run test
a. Screw clip at inlet is opened to allow water to flow down through
the sample, and the water level is observed in the standpipe.
b. As soon as it reaches the level h1, the timer clock is started.
c. The time is observed and recored when the level reaches h 3, and
when it reaches h2, then the clock is stopped.
d. Screw clip at inlet is closed.
10. Repeat test
11. Calculate permeability
12. Report result
5.0 RESULTS

Falling Head Permeability test

Sample diameter, D: 99.21 Sample length, L: 129.84 mm

mm
Sample area, A: 7730.38 Sample volume, V: 1003.7 cm3
mm2
Mass of mould: 960 g Mass of sample + mould: 2820.0 g
Mass of sample: 1860 g

S.G. measured/assumed: Voids ratio:

Bulk density, : 16.43 Dry density, : 14.94
kN/m3 kN/m3
Moisture content: 20 % Test temperature: - c

Standpipe diameter: 4.05 Standpipe area, a: 12.88 mm2

mm

Reading:
h1 h2
Reference Height Height Test
point above above No. Time, t Height
datum, y outlet, h (min) ratios
(mm) (mm)
1 933.6 833.6 1 0.48 1.12
2 833.6 733.6 2 1.05 1.14
3 733.6 633.6 3 1.60 1.16
4 633.6 533.6 4 2.22 1.19

6.0 SAMPLE CALCULATION

 1. The coefficient of permeability for the given sample of soil.

2.303aL  h 
Permeability, k  log10  1  ( m / s ) =
1000 xAx 60t  h2 

2.303 x12.88 x129.84  933.6 

k1  log10   (m / s )
1000 x 7730.38 x 60 x 0.48  833.6 

= 8.51 x 10-7 m/s

2.303 x12.88 x129.84  833.6 

k2  log10   (m / s)
1000 x 7730.38 x60 x1.05  733.6 

= 4.39 x 10-7 m/s

2.303 x12.88 x129.84  733.6 

k3  log10   (m / s )
1000 x7730.38 x 60 x1.60  633.6 

= 3.30 x 10-7 m/s

2.303 x12.88 x129.84  633.6 

k4  log10   (m / s)
1000 x 7730.38 x 60 x 2.22  533.6 

= 2.79 x 10-7 m/s

7.0 DISCUSSION
 The test of falling head permeability test is carried out to determine the
permeability of soils of intermediate and low permeability than is less than 10 -4
m/s. The coefficient of permeability is defined as the flow rate under laminar flow
conditions through a unit cross sectional are of porous medium under unit
hydraulic gradient.

The coefficient of permeability for our soil sample is k 1= 8.51 x 10-7 m/s,
k2= 4.39 x 10-7 m/s m/s , k3= 3.30 x 10-7 m/s and k4= 2.79 x 10-7 m/s.

The average for the coefficient of permeability is 4.7475 x 10 -7 m/s. Based

on Figure 3, the sample soil is classified as silt or silt clay.

From here, we knew that silt clay comprised mainly of intermediate sized
particles, are fertile, fairly well drained and hold more moisture than sandy soils,
but are easily compacted. Silt as a soil separate consists of mineral soil particles
that are 0.002 to 0.05 millimeter in diameter. Silt has a relatively limited surface
area and little chemical activity. Soils high in silt may compact under heavy traffic
and this affects the movement of air and water in the soil.

8.0 CONCLUSION
 As the result, we can able to describe the general accepted practice to
determine the coefficient of permeability of silts and clay, identify the relationship
between permeability and pore size of the fine grained soils and measure the
coefficient of permeability of silts and clays.

Permeability can be defined as the ability of a porous medium to allow the

flow of a fluid through it, typically expressed as the coefficient of hydraulic
conductivity, (k). A porous medium is a material, granular or fibrous, containing
void spaces. In this particular project, the medium studied was Superpave
designed asphalt mixtures and the fluid used was distilled water at room
temperature

This test was initially investigated for two primary reasons. First, the
calculated permeability values for samples tested using this setup, as well as the
permeameter assembly and process itself is easily checked for consistency.
Secondly, the validity of Darcy’s Law for the test executed in the laboratory can
be evaluated. It was initially assumed for the tests that Darcy’s law is valid and
that the hydraulic conductivity is essentially unaffected by hydraulic gradient.