0% found this document useful (0 votes)
89 views

Sosiometrika: Multiple Classification Analysis (MCA)

This document describes multiple classification analysis (MCA), which is used to analyze the effects of multiple categorical predictors on a dependent variable. MCA models the dependent variable as the grand mean plus effects of each row and column of predictors plus an error term. It provides summaries of the variance explained by each row and column as well as the overall model. SPSS syntax is also shown for conducting an MCA on a dataset examining the effects of task difficulty and arousal on performance.

Uploaded by

Firdaus Adam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
89 views

Sosiometrika: Multiple Classification Analysis (MCA)

This document describes multiple classification analysis (MCA), which is used to analyze the effects of multiple categorical predictors on a dependent variable. MCA models the dependent variable as the grand mean plus effects of each row and column of predictors plus an error term. It provides summaries of the variance explained by each row and column as well as the overall model. SPSS syntax is also shown for conducting an MCA on a dataset examining the effects of task difficulty and arousal on performance.

Uploaded by

Firdaus Adam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

SOSIOMETRIKA

MULTIPLE CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS


(MCA)
Model MCA
Yij...n= Y + a i +b j + . . . .+e ij..n
where
Yij...n = The score on the dependent variable of individual n
who falls in category i of predictor A,
category j of predictor B, etc

= Grand mean of the dependent variable.


Y
ai = The effect of the membership in the i th category of
predictor A.
bj = The effect of the membership in the j th category of
predictor B.

e ij..n= Error term for this individual.


Model MCA
Yij...n = Grand Mean + Row Effect + Column Effect + Residual

Grand Mean

Row Effect
Yij...n = Column Effect

Residual
Performance by Task Difficulty and Arousal

Arousal (Column)
Low Medium High Row Mean
Task Easy 3 2 9
Difficulty 1 5 9
(Row)
1 9 13 6
6 7 6
4 7 8
Difficult
0 3 0
2 8 0
0 3 0 2
0 3 5
3 3 0
Column Mean 2 5 5 4 Grand Mean
2 3
2
SSTotal = ∑∑ ( yij − Y )
i =1 j =1

= (3 - 4) 2 + ... + (0 − 4) 2 = 360
2
2
SS Row = ∑ wi ( yi. − Y )
i =1

= 15.(6 − 4) 2 + 15.(2 − 4) 2 = 60 + 60 =120


3
SS Column = ∑ w j ( y. j − Y ) 2
j =1

= 10.( 2 − 4) 2 + 10.(5 − 4) 2 + 10.(5 − 4) 2


= 40 + 10 + 10 = 60
SSCombined = SS Row + SSColumn
SS Model = SS Row + SS Column
SS Re sidual = SSTotal − SS Model
df Total = N − 1 = 30 − 1 = 29
df Row = # of rows (levels ) − 1 = 2 − 1 = 1
df Column = # of columns (levels) − 1 = 3 − 1 = 2
df Combined = df Row + df Column = 1 + 2 = 3
df Model = df Row + df Column = 1 + 2 = 3

df Re sidual = df Total − df Model = 29 − 3 = 26


Eta (η)

SS Row
Etarow = η row =
SSTotal

SS Column
Etacolumn = ηcolumn =
SSTotal
Goodness of Fit

SS Model
R=
SSTotal
Syntax SPSS MCA
*MCA model with categorical predictors:.
ANOVA Performance by Difficulty (1,2) Arousal (1,3)
/MAXORDERS=NONE
/METHOD=EXPERIMENTAL
/STATISTICS=MCA.
Struktur Data MCA dengan SPSS

Widyo Pura Buana - MCA


ANOVAa

Tingkat Kesulitan Pekerjaan dan Gairah Kerja Experimental Method


berpengaruh terhadap Performance Kerja
(baik secara overall atau individual) Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Performance Main (Combined) 180.000 3 60.000 8.667 .000
Effects
Task Difficulty 120.000 1 120.000 17.333 .000
Arousal 60.000 2 30.000 4.333 .024
Model 180.000 3 60.000 8.667 .000
Residual 180.000 26 6.923
Total 360.000 29 12.414
Significant
a. Performance by Task Difficulty, Arousal
MCAa

Predicted Mean Deviation


N Adjusted Adjusted
Unadjusted for Unadjusted for
Factors Factors
Performance Task Difficulty Easy 15 6.00 6.00 2.000 2.000
Difficult 15 2.00 2.00 -2.000 -2.000
Arousal Low 10 2.00 2.00 -2.000 -2.000
Medium 10 5.00 5.00 1.000 1.000
High 10 5.00 5.00 1.000 1.000
a. Performance by Task Difficulty, Arousal

Performance
Deviation
Mean
Task Easy 6 2 =6–4
Row Row(i)-Grand Mean
Difficulty Difficult 2 -2 =2–4
Low 2 -2 =2–4
Column Arousal Medium 5 1 =5–4 Column(j)-Grand Mean
High 5 1 =5–4
Grand Mean 4
Factor Summarya
Beta
Eta Adjusted Formula
for Factors
Task
=SQRT( SSRow/ SSTotal )
Difficulty .577 .577
=SQRT(120/360)
Performance (Row)
Arousal =SQRT( SSColumn/ SSTotal )
.408 .408
(Column) =SQRT(60/360)
Model Goodness of Fit
R R Squared
Performance by Task
Difficulty, Arousal .707 .500

=SQRT(R-Squared) = SSModel/SSTotal
Terima Kasih

16

You might also like