Elder 1967
Elder 1967
29-48 29
Printed in Great Britain
1. Introduction
The main aim of this paper is a study of the application of the numerical
method proposed by the author (Elder 1 9 6 6 ~ to ) free convection in a porous
medium. From the point of view of fluid mechanics, the principal interest in
convection in a porous medium is that the system is non-linear solely because of
the advection of heat. This is therefore one of the simplest non-linear elliptic
systems.
The paper is concerned with the flow in a homogeneous horizontal slab which
is heated from below. It is mainly in this respect that the flow differs from that of
the previous study (Elder 1966a) in which a uniform temperature difference was
maintained across a vertical slot filled with viscous fluid. I n that case the flow is
largely uni-cellular. The present case is more complex in that, as in the BBnard-
Rayleigh problem, there is no motion below the critical Rayleigh number, the
consequent motion is multi-cellular and is considerably affected by end-effects.
It is of interest to study these effects for a flow in which there is no advection
30 J. W. Elder
or diffusion of vorticity especially in so far as these flows show similar behaviour
to the convection of a viscous fluid, in particular one with large Prandtl
number.
The above point of view has not been the original motivation for this and other
studies. Ever since the original work of Darcy (1856)there have been numerous
studies by hydrologists, petroleum geologists, chemical engineers, geologists and
geophysicists of flow in a porous medium. Until quite recently most of these
studies have been for isothermal flow (see,for example, the review by Richardson
1961),but in the last twenty years or so geophysicists and others have begun to
consider the possibility that convection in a porous medium occurs within the
earth. Two principal areas of interest have so far emerged. The first and better
known is related to the problem of so-called geothermal or hot-spring areas. An
early study was that of Einarsson (1942). The possibility of free convection in
a porous medium uniformly heated from below, and the similarity to the Benard-
Rayleigh problem, was pointed out by Horton & Rogers (1945) and Lapwood
(1948).Wooding (1957 and following papers) has greatly extended these studies,
Elder (1958) and Schneider (1963) have performed laboratory experiments and
Donaldson (1962)has given some numerical calculations. The second, and much
more speculative, possibility is that the earth’s mantle behaves like a porous
medium. This idea has been used in a discussion of earthquake sources by Frank
(1965) and in a model of vulcanism by Elder (1966b). These geophysical studies
have recently been reviewed by the author (1965).
The problem is formulated in $ 2 . The laboratory measurements of heat
transfer are described in $ 3 and a similar numerical investigation is given in 5 4.
I n the previous study it was soon found that most of the difficulties arose in the
application of the boundary conditions. It therefore seemed desirable to study
flows produced by a variety of boundary conditions. This is largely the purpose
of § $ 5 and 6, an investigation of end effects and mass discharge; followed by
a discussion in $ 7.
i
=
B = gHk/K,v (discharge number), (1)
e = E/H and 1 = L / H (aspect ratios).
The only point of novelty here is the parameter B, to be called the discharge
number, which is a measure of the ratio of the imposed pressure forces to the
viscous forces, and can arise in problems involving mass discharge.
The field variables can be conveniently made dimensionless by choosing u n i t s
of length, temperature, pressure, velocity
H , A T , PovKJk, KmIH,
where po is the density of the fluid at temperature To.
For steady motion the field
equations, simplified by the Boussinesq approximation, can be written with the
above units in dimensionless form (Wooding 1957)
v . q = 0,
O = -Vp+AOk-q,
9 .ve = VW,
where q is the velocity, p is the departure of the pressure from its value when
A = 0 , 8 is the temperature, and k is a unit vertical vector. We note that there is
no Prandtl number effect since there are no inertia forces.
I n two dimensions, erecting a Cartesian co-ordinate frame Oxyz so that motion
is in planes y = constant and z is measured vertically upwards, and introducing
a stream function $, we have
w = AO,, (3a)
VZ$ = w, (3 b )
v = a($,@, (3c)
v2e = v, (34
where 8 is the Jacobian operator and x is the horizontal co-ordinate. Note that
q = ( - $B, $), and the vorticity w = V x q = - jw, where j is the unit vector
parallel to the y-axis (into the paper in the diagrams shown here). The source
term V is the rate of generation of temperature and is produced solely by advec-
tion. In the discussion a($., 8) is called the advection. We note that vorticity is
generated by the horizontal gradient of the buoyancy force and that there is no
advection or diffusion of vorticity.
We consider two arrangements of the boundary conditions. The first is for
impermeable walls for which in the two-dimensional analysis: $ = 8 = 0 on the
walls except that 8 = 1 on 1x1 < +l, x = 0. The second is the same except that
we allow parts of the walls to be permeable. This is discussed more fully in 9 6.
32 J . W . Elder
(9 b/&< 1,
(ii) the Reynolds number Ub2/vS-g 1,
(iii) the Peclet number Ub2/K8@ 1.
These conditions ensure that there is negligible advection of vorticity and rapid
diffusion of vorticity and heat across the flow. For the experiments described
below departure from the Hele-Shaw approximation occurred when b/6 2 1.
50
20
N lo
1
10' 102 103 10'
A
10
1000 I I I
N* 100
I I I
10
108 lo9 10'0 10"
A*
FIGURE 2. Heat-transfer characteristic N*(A*) in the viscous-flow region with Nusselt
number N* and Eayleigh number A* based on the fluid properties alone: + , 6 mm
styropor balls, L = H = 35.6 cm, diameter of slab 180 cm; 0, 3 mm styropor balls,
diameter of slab 16 cm; x , 5 mm glass spheres, L = H = 8.0 em, diamcter of slab, 16 cm.
consistent with the prediction of 4n2of Lapwood (1948).Above A, the points lie
reasonably close to
N = A140 & 10 yo. (6)
I n dimensional form (6) becomes
&/(heatedarea) = k p y g ( A T ) 2 / 4 0 , (7)
a quadratic relation between Q and A T . We note that Q is independent of H
and K,.
3.4. Heat transfer :viscous boundary-layer region
Above some value of the Rayleigh number, A > A , say, the experimental points
begin to fall below (6). Some of these measurements are also shown in figure 1.
This behaviour has also been noted by Schneider (1963). It is no longer possible
to correlate the data of N ( A )solely by the parameters (1). Clearly an additional
quantity is required. The initial departure from (6) closely follows N I XA t , as in
simple viscous convection, suggesting the use of A* E y g A T H 3 / m ,the viscous
Free convection in a porous medium 35
flow Rayleigh number. This has been done in figure 2-where N", A* are now
defined in terms of the parameters of the fluid alone.
The initial departure from (6) now follows
N * / A * i = 0.26 & 0.02, (8)
remarkably close to the value 0.24 found by Silveston (1958)for viscous laminar
convection between horizontal planes. At much higher values of A* the curve
follows
N*/A** = 0.1 f 0.02 (9)
again reasonably close to the viscous flow value of 0.06 given by Jakob (1949).
The data for (9) were obtained with L = 35.6 em and 6 mm plastic balls as the
medium.
Assuming both (6), (8) valid at A , we have
A, + 20(H2/k)*/&, (10)
where 5 =.I,. Writing at A , the Nusselt number N, = H/26,, we find typically
in these experiments 8,lA + 0.2, where A is the diameter of the spheres. It is not
surprising that relations of the form (8) and (9) occur when the boundary-layer
thickness is somewhat smaller than the scale of the porous medium. As noted by
Wooding (1958)it is to be expected that equations (2) are no longer valid within
a distance of order A from a boundary-indeed this is implicit in the definition
of q.
Here the relations (8), (9) are merely an inconvenience in so far as they limit
the range of A accessible to a given apparatus. However, in the problem of con-
vection in the earth's mantle, assuming that the mantle behaves like a porous
medium, the change from porous to viscous flow may be of importance in
describing the region between the lower and upper mantle.
i
I
8
.
-
3.
z
I
3
0 100
S
t N (20OdZ/7r2)s. (11)
We note the important result that as the critical Rayleigh number is
approached (from above) the time for the establishment of the steady motion is
considerably larger than the time to heat the slab solely by conduction. For
example, at A = 50, as shown in figure 3, the solution has converged by s E 80
Free convection in a porous medium 37
when, from ( 1 I ) , t x 40/n2,
corresponding to a rate 40 times slower than that of
conduction alone. For this reason attempts to study the instability of a layer of
fluid suddenly heated from below, by the assumption that the temperature field
is quasi-steady, are bound to fail (Foster 1965).
A l/d = 10 15 20 25 30 40 00 100Nm/A
45 - - -_ (1.09) - - 1.20 2.66
50 >1.01 1.19 1.26 1.30 - - 1.36 2.73
60 1.36 1.51 1.58 1.62 1.64 - 1.70 2.83
70 - - - 1.87 1.90 - 1.92 2.75
80 1.80 1.96 2.04 2.08 2.12 - 2.02 2.52
90 - - - 2,27 2.30 - 2-33 2.58
100 2.09 2.28 2.37 (2.42) 2.46 2.51 2.62 2.62
TABLE1. Numerical values of the Nusselt number N ( A , d ) in a square box with mesh
spacing d and Rayleigh number A. The values d = co are obtained assuming N , - N d2,
N
and are cstimatcd t o about _+ 2 yo. The values in brackets are for l/d = 24. (PM1-32.)
that there is a balance between buoyancy forces and viscous forces and that
while the heat enters the slab by conduction it is carried away from the immediate
vicinity of the heated surface by vertical advection which is dominant in the
outer portion of the boundary layer on the heated surface.
5.707 18.14
Stream function Advection
FIGURE 5. Stream function and advection in a half-cell calculated a t Rayleigh number
A = 120. Contours drawn a t intervals of -1(0.2)1 of the maximum absolute value
(indicated below the figure). Mesh 31 x 21.
The consistency of both the experimental and the numerical data in the quad-
ratic region of the empirical expression (6) confirms the experimental procedure,
the validity of the Hele-Shaw cell approximation for non-isothermal flows and
the numerical method. We may therefore proceed using the numerical method with
some confidence. Our interest now will concentrate on the role of different
boundary conditions from those used above. While our immediate objective is
to test the numerical scheme under diverse boundary conditions the flows are of
considerable interest in themselves.
Free convection in a porous medium 39
5. End-effects
In spite of the numerous studies of free convection, it is surprising to note that
there has been relatively little consideration of end-effects, viz. for the present
problem the peculiarities which arise when the aspect ratios 1 and e are finite.
~~
1.000- 5.230
1.000 5305
1000 5156
FIGURE 6. End-effects. Isotherms and streamlines in a slab of horizontal extent e = 10
calculated a t Rayleigh number A = 80, mesh spacing d = -& and various values of the
heater length I ; (a)and (b), I = 2; (c) and (d), 1 = 3; ( e ) and (f), I = 4; ( 9 ) and ( h )I = 6 .
Apart from the contour 0.03, the contours are at intervals -1(0*2)l of the maximum
value of the function.
N
3.5
3
rn \ 2
I I
4
I
G I
(b)
2.5
n
2
1.5
0.5
0
FIGURE 7. End-effects, role of heater length I on: ( a )wavelength h of inner Rayleigh cell;
( b ) Nusselt number N ; (c) maximum value of the streamfunction $e (of the end cells).
Parameters as in figure 6. (PM 47-65.)
Free convection in u porous medium 41
For 1 = 2 , figures 6 ( a )and ( b ) ,there are two regions of opposite circulation.
These end cells give a fairly narrow column of heated fluid rising above the heated
region with a more diffuse return flow in the outer portion of the slab. We note
that the flow distant from the heater, near the vertical walls, is very weak. How-
ever, for l > 2 in addition to the end cells there are nearly square cells, occurring
in pairs of opposite circulation, above the central portion of the heated surface.
We shall call these Rayleigh cells. For 1 = 3, figures 6 ( c ) and ( d ) ,there is one pair
of Rayleigh cells. Incidentally, we note that the flow on x = 0 is downward.
Clearly the phase of the Rayleigh cells is set by their number and the phase of
the end cells, which is always as in figure 6 (b).I n figures 6 ( e ) and (f)with 1 = 4,
the motion is as for 1 = 3 except that the Rayleigh cells have a much larger
wavelength. For 1 = 6, figures 6(g) and (h),three pairs of Rayleigh cells appear.
The gross changes of the system as 1 is varied are summarized in figure 7 which
shows: the wavelength h of the inner pair of Rayleigh cells for the same arrange-
ment used in figure 6; the Nusselt number N ; and the maximum value of the
streamfunction $,, which in fact corresponds to that of the end cells.
The breaks in the curves correspond to the appearance of pairs of Rayleigh
cells at 1 = 2.0, 4.3, 5-4. The changes in wavelength are closely paralleled by
corresponding changes in N and $,.
6. Mass discharge
A problem of particular interest to the geophysicist for studies of both hydro-
thermal systems and penetrative convection in the upper mantle is the flow
when it is dominated by mass discharge. The laboratory experiments and their
relation to hydrothermal systems have already been described (Elder 1965); here
we shall discuss the numerical experiments.
Our particular interest, keeping in mind other possible applications of the
numerical procedure, is to show that the method used below is satisfactory in
dealing with the boundary conditions which arise with mass discharge in a
convective system.
Two extreme possibilities arise: forced and natural discharge. I n forced dis-
charge we consider that the discharge arises from the ambient pressure field,
e.g. due to variations of the water-table level. In natural discharge we consider
that the ambient variations of the pressure are negligible ;the discharge is driven
solely by the pressure field arising from the differential heating of the fluid.
7574
972 1
I
4127
FIGURE
10. Natural discharge, calculated isotherms (above) and stream function.
A = 50, E = 1 , e = 5, mesh 101 x 21. (POR 67.)
where in (16)p is the solution of (15). This has proved to be a satisfactory scheme
although somewhat slower than the simple scheme (3).
Figure 10 shows the temperature and stream function distributions for a
Rayleigh number A = 50. Recharge occurs over the bulk of the upper surface,
the heated fluid rises as a fairly thin column even at this rather low Rayleigh
number, and only about 30 yoof the fluid in the plume is recirculated. I n natural
46 J . W . Elder
systems with very large Rayleigh numbers we anticipate that only a very small
portion of fluid is recirculated.
Figure 11 shows two characteristic parameters of the flow. Figure 11( a )shows
the local Nusselt number N' = N ' ( x ) on z = 0 and x = 1. The pronounced dis-
continuity at the ends of the heated surface is simply a feature of our boundary
conditions. What is of considerable geophysical interest is that the heat flux on
z = 1 falls rapidly to zero outside the region of the discharge. Figure l l ( b ) shows
the discharge velocity. Discharge occurs over a region of width 1.4; elsewhere the
flow is into the slab. This inward flow is sufficient to reduce the surface heat flux
to zero.
10
5
N
-5 I I I I I -5
-2 -1 0 1 2 -2 -1 0 1 2
X X
(0) (b)
11. Natural discharge, parameters as in figure 10. ( a ) Heat flux N ' ;
FIGURE
( b ) velocity through the upper surface W .
7. Concluding remarks
Some of the above flows are crudely analogous to the corresponding flows of
a viscous fluid. This is particularly the case when inertial effects, which arise
with a viscous fluid, are small, either because the Prandtl number is large or
because, near the critical Rayleigh number, the advection of vorticity is negli-
gible. There is the important difference, however, that flow in a porous medium
provides a realization of so-called free-free boundary conditions, whereas, while
frequently used in a preliminary analysis, these are rather artificial boundary
conditions for a viscous fluid.
Near the critical Rayleigh number, the flows are very similar, as pointed out
in the analyses of Horton & Rogers (1945) and Lapwood (1948). The essential
difference is that, while in both cases inertial effects are negligible, we must allow
for diffusion of vorticity in a viscous fluid. This merely changes the operator V4
in (12) to V6, an increase by a factor of n2(m2+n2). Consequently the critical
Rayleigh number is increased from 4n2to 27;rr4/4and the width of the cells by 4 2
(Chandrasekhar 1961).
Above the critical Rayleigh number, (6) suggests that N + A/A,, so that we
might anticipate a similar relation in a viscous fluid. Inspection of Silveston’s
(1958) measurements shows that indeed N* = A*/A: up to N* x 1-5, sug-
gesting that inertial effects are negligible here. Beyond this value, however, the
experimental curve falls rapidly below the linear relation. This is undoubtedly
due to the rapid increase in the advection of vorticity and the growth of viscous
boundary layers. Nevertheless, both flows are cellular and strongly influenced
by end-effects.A study of end-effectsfor free convection of a viscous fluid will be
reported elsewhere. It is sufficient here to note that as with flow in a porous
medium the phase of the cellular motion, the distribution of horizontal wave-
numbers, and hysteresis are dominated by the end cells.
FIGURE 8. End-effect in a thin cavity. Photographs of steady flows uith medicinal paraffin
in a Helc-Shaw cell of depth 2.0 cm, lcngth 30.0 cm, width 0 6 em; heated strip of length
10 cm. Values of lo-* A : ( a ) 1.02, ( b ) 1.72, (c) 2.24, (cl) 2.38, ( e ) 2.90, (f)3.97, (y) 1.10
(HSI: 1-9).
Jozcimd of Fluid Meclmnics, T'ol. 27, port 1 Plate 2
ELDER