Collecting Data and Organization Element
Collecting Data and Organization Element
The main consideration is to make sure that any information collected is done in a
way and for a purpose that is consistent with the Code and complies with freedom of
information and privacy protection legislation. In the interest of effectiveness and
efficiency, it is recommended that efforts be made to collect data that will shed light
on issues or opportunities. To protect the credibility and reliability of data,
information should be gathered using accepted data collection techniques
Does the organization have human resources and human rights policies,
practices and procedures that are accessible to all employees or to the people
they serve?
Does the organization have clear, transparent and fair complaint procedures in
place to deal with allegations of discrimination, harassment or systemic
barriers?
Have any claims, grievances or allegations been made or received relating to
discrimination, harassment or systemic barriers?
o Do any signal barriers to persons protected under the Code and/or other
individuals/groups in society based on a non-Code ground?
o Have any been dealt with appropriately and in accordance with existing
polices, practices and procedures?
Example: The review in Step 1 may have identified the following issues and/or
opportunities for collecting data:
Example: An aging taxpayer base provides a government body with a pressing reason
to collect data on this group’s projected size, needs and revenue base. This changing
demographic also presents an opportunity for the government body to ensure that it is
proactively developing policies, programs and services that are accessible and
appropriate to meet the needs and concerns of these taxpayers.
Did the internal and external assessment of the organization in Step 1 reveal
any critical gaps or trends that are apparent in the organization, industry/sector
or similar organizations?
Is there one particular area that has drawn positive/negative media attention or
been subject to multiple complaints, internal rumors and concerns?
Does there seem to be a greater diversity or lack of diversity in one area
compared to others?
The “group of interest” (e.g., youth service users of a local community center who
cannot read and speak English as a second language) will be the focus of the study,
and the data collection methods used will refer to this group, or the persons within it,
depending on the goals of the project.
Understanding discrimination
When thinking about who the data will be collected about, it is important to
consider who you think will be most affected by, for example, the
discrimination or inequities that you wish to measure. Is it a broad category
(e.g., all service users who cannot read), or a sub-set of that category
(e.g., youth service users who cannot read)? The italicized words refer to a
unique characteristic about a broader group that an organization may wish to
gather information about.
Depending on factors like the goals of the data collection project, the
organization’s size, resources and time, data may be gathered about many sub-
sets within a broader group of interest (e.g., youth service users who cannot
read and who speak English as a second language).
The “comparator group” should be persons who share one or more characteristics with
the persons in the group of interest, but differ in the key characteristic(s) being studied
(e.g., youth service users who cannot read but can speak English fluently). The
experiences of youth service users who cannot read and who speak English as a
second language can then be compared to youth service users who cannot read but can
speak English fluently.
Some data collection initiatives require gathering data from multiple sizes, groups or
communities located in different locations and geographical areas. When determining
where to collect information from, key factors to consider include who the data will
be collected about and who the data will be compared to.
What categories will be used to identify the group of interest and comparator group?
Choosing categories provides a way to organize the information that is collected. This
can be done either before collecting data, as discussed in this step, or after data is
collected
Qualitative data:
Typically, data is called “qualitative” if it is in the form of words, but may also
include any information that is not numerical in form, such as photographs,
videos and sound recordings.
Qualitative methods are aimed at describing a specific context, event, people or
relationship in a broad contextual way, by trying to understand the underlying
reasons for behavior, thoughts and feelings.
Potential strengths:
qualitative data excels at "telling the story “From the participant's viewpoint (it
helps participants feel like they have been heard)
Potential weaknesses:
Getting buy-in from senior leadership and key stakeholders, in or outside of the
organization. This group could include boards of directors, management
committees, union representatives, employees, community groups, tenants,
customers and service users.
Establishing a steering committee or selecting a person(s) to be consulted and
held accountable for all major decisions about the data collection process, such
as design, logistics, communication management, coordination and finances.
Determining who will collect the data (e.g., experts or trained employees).
Identifying the logistics, resources, technology and people needed to develop
and implement a data collection initiative.
Anticipating and addressing key stakeholder concerns and questions about the
project.
Designing a communication and consultation strategy that will explain the data
collection initiative and encourage the highest possible participation rate.
Protecting privacy and personal information by using carefully controlled
procedures for collecting, storing and accessing data that comply with privacy,
human rights and other legislation. Dignity and confidentiality must be
respected.
Minimizing the impact and inconvenience for the people affected in the
workplace or service environment, which includes choosing the best time to
collect the data.
Aiming for flexibility to allow for changes without great expense or
inconvenience.
Considering a test period or a pilot phase to allow you to improve and modify
data collection methods, as may be needed
Step 5: Analyze and interpret data
Step 5 involves analyzing and interpreting the data collected. Whether quantitative
and/or qualitative methods of gathering data are used, the analysis can be complex, or
less so, depending on the methods used and the amount of data collected.
Explaining the technical steps involved in analyzing and interpreting data is beyond
the scope of this guide. An organization will have to determine whether it has the
internal capacity and expertise to analyze and interpret data itself, or whether it will
need the help of an external consultant.
A smaller organization that has basic data collection needs may be able to rely on
internal expertise and existing resources to interpret the meaning of gathered data.
Quantitative and qualitative information can provide a solid basis for creating an
effective action plan designed to achieve strategic organizational human resources,
human rights, equity and diversity goals identified through the data collection process.
If an organization feels it has enough information to develop an action plan, it should
consider including the following elements:
In some cases, an organization may decide that it needs to collect more information
because there are gaps in the data collected, or areas where the data is unclear or
inconclusive. This may prompt them to conduct a more detailed internal and external
assessment (go back to Step 1) or try another approach.
In the end, there is no one or “right way” to conduct a data collection initiative
LET’S MAKE IT SHORT?
Qualitative Data
Quantitative Data
How long will the data be collected (the scope of data collection)?
Step 4: Collect data
Step 5: Analyze and interpret data
Step 6: Act on result