0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views

Problems 2

The document describes a problem involving two charged particles located at (0,1) and (1,0) and asks to calculate the electric field, direction of electric field, electric potential, and energy needed to bring a +1.0 μC charge to the origin. It provides the solution, showing that the electric field magnitude is 9,000 N/C and points at a 45 degree angle toward the negative charge and away from the positive charge. The electric potential is calculated to be 0 V and no work is required to move a charge to the origin since the potential is zero there.

Uploaded by

Martinez 100
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views

Problems 2

The document describes a problem involving two charged particles located at (0,1) and (1,0) and asks to calculate the electric field, direction of electric field, electric potential, and energy needed to bring a +1.0 μC charge to the origin. It provides the solution, showing that the electric field magnitude is 9,000 N/C and points at a 45 degree angle toward the negative charge and away from the positive charge. The electric potential is calculated to be 0 V and no work is required to move a charge to the origin since the potential is zero there.

Uploaded by

Martinez 100
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

1.A charge of −1.

0 μC is located on the y-axis 1.0 m from the origin at the coordinates (0,1) while a second charge
of +1.0 μC is located on the x-axis 1.0 m from the origin at the coordinates (1,0). Determine the value of the
following quantities at the origin…
a. the magnitude of the electric field
b. the direction of the electric field
c. the electric potential (assuming the potential is zero at infinite distance)
d. the energy needed to bring a +1.0 μC charge to this position from infinitely far away

solution

a. Since the charges are identical in magnitude and equally far from the origin, we can do one computation for
both charges.
k
E =  q
r2
(9.0  × 109 N m2/C2)(1.0  × 10−6 C)
E = 
(1.0 m)2
 
E = 9,000 N/C
 

b. Electric field lines come out of positive charges and go into negative charges. At the origin, this results in
an electric field that points "left" (away from the positive change) and "up" (toward the negative charge). These two
vectors form the legs of a 45°–45°–90° triangle whose sides are in the ratio 1:1:√2.

c. ∑E = √2 × 9,000 N/C = 12,700 N/C

d.
Moving "up" and to the "left" in equal amounts results in a 135° standard angle.
e. Once again, since the charges are identical in magnitude and equally far from the origin, we only need to
compute one number.
k
V =  q
r
(9.0  × 109 N m2/C2)(1.0  × 10−6 C)
V = 
(1.0 m)
 
V = 9,000 V
 

f. Electric potential is a scalar quantity. It doesn't have direction, but it does have sign. The positive charge
contributes a positive potential and the negative charge contributes a negative potential. Add them up and watch
them cancel.

g. ∑V = 9,000 V − 9,000 V = 0 V
h. The electric potential at a point in space is defined as the work per unit charge required to move a test
charge to that location from infinitely far away.

∆V =  ∆U

]]1
E

i. Algebra shows that work is charge times potential difference. Since the potential at the origin is zero, no
work is required to move a charge to this point.

∆UE = q∆V

∆UE = (1.0 × 10−6 C)(0 V)

∆UE = 0 J

practice problem 2

A proton (mass m, charge +e) and an alpha particle (mass 4m, charge +2e) approach one another with the same
initial speed v from an initially large distance. How close will these two particles get to one another before turning
around?

solution

The kinetic energy of the moving particles is completely transformed into electric potential energy at the point of
closest approach.

 
Ue  = K
 

k(e)
1 1
(2e)  =   (m)v2 +   (4m)v2

r 2 2

Finish the algebra.

4ke2
r = 
5mv2

practice problem 3

sketch-v.pdf
The diagram below shows the location and charge of four identical small spheres. Find the electric potential at the
five points indicated with open circles. Use these results and symmetry to find the potential at as many points as
possible without additional calculation. Write your results on or near the points. Sketch at least 4 equipotential lines.
Pick round values seperated by a uniform interval. At least one of the lines should be disconnected.

]]2
solution

Use the equation for the electric potential from a set of point charges.

V = k  q

∑ r

Since each charge is the same size, we can factor it out.

1
V = kq ∑ 
r

In order to save screen real estate, let's compute the product of the constants once…

kq = (9 × 109 N m2/C2)(1 × 10−6 C) = (9,000 N m2/C)

and the sum of the distances to the four charges five times…

1 1 1 1 1 ⎞
∑   = ⎜  +   +   +  ⎟
r1 √8 m √8 m √8 m √8 m ⎠

1
∑   = 1.41421…m−1
r1

 

1 1 1 1 1 ⎞
∑   =  ⎜  +   +   +  ⎟
r2 √8 m √8 m √40 m √40 m⎠

1
∑   = 1.02333…m−1
r2

 

1 1 1 1 1 ⎞
∑   =  ⎜  +   +   +  ⎟
r3 √20 m √20 m √68 m √68 m⎠

1
∑   = 0.68974…m−1
r3

]]3

1 1 1 1 ⎞ 1
∑   =  ⎜  +   +   +  ⎟
r4 2 m 2 m √20 m √20 m⎠

1
∑   = 1.44721…m−1
r4

 

1 1 1 1 1⎞
∑   =  ⎜  +   +   +  ⎟
r5 2 m √20 m 6 m √52 m⎠

1
∑   = 1.02894…m−1
r5

Apply it at each of the five locations, summing up the contributions of the four point charges.

V1 = (9,000 N m2/C)(1.41421…m−1)

V1 = 12,700 V

V2 = (9,000 N m2/C)(1.02333…m−1)

V2 = 9,210 V

V3 = (9,000 N m2/C)(0.68974…m−1)

V3 = 6,210 V

V4 = (9,000 N m2/C)(1.44721…m−1)

V4 = 13,000 V

V5 = (9,000 N m2/C)(1.23605…m−1)

V5 = 9,260 V

Record the numbers at as many symmetric locations as possible.

]]4
Sketch in the equipotentials.

practice problem 4

Fission is the splitting of a heavy atomic nucleus into two roughly equal halves accompanied by the release of a
large amount of energy. An atomic nucleus can be modeled as a sphere whose charge is distributed uniformly across
its entire volume. Determine the energy released when a heavy nucleus undergoes nuclear fission using electrostatic
principles.
a. Derive an equation for the electrostatic energy needed to assemble a charged sphere from an
infinite swarm of infinitesimal charges located infinitely far away. (In other words, use calculus.)
Let R be the sphere's radius, Q be its total charge, V be its volume, and ρ be its charge density.
b. Express the total energy of two half-sized spheres in terms of the energy of one whole sphere. Half-
sized spheres have half the volume and half the charge of a whole sphere (because charge density is
assumed to be constant).
c. Calculate the energy released when a nucleus of uranium 235 (the isotope responsible for powering
some nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons) splits into two identical daughter nuclei. Give your final
answer in the preferred unit for nuclear reactions, the megaelectronvolt. (A nucleus of 23592U has a
radius of 5.8337 fm.)

solution

a. One way to make a big sphere to add layers to an already existing smaller sphere. Calculus allows us to
start with an initial sphere with zero radius (r0 = 0), add layers to it of infinitesimal thickness (dr), and end up with a
sphere with nonzero radius (r = R) by repeating the process an infinite number of times (∫). This calculus thing is
pretty amazing.

The electrostatic potential energy of two point charges is given by…

kq1q2
U = 
r

where…
U = electric potential energy
k = the electrostatic constant
q1 = one point charge
q1 = another point charge
r = the separation between charges

In our sphere built up layer by layer, the first charge is a solid sphere with uniform charge density.

4
q1 = ρ   πr3
3

The second charge is a thin spherical shell with the same charge density.

]]5
q2 = ρ(4πr2dr)

These two charges are effectively separated by the radius of the solid sphere. The energy equation then
becomes a mess…

  R

4 1
U = ⌠k (ρ   πr3) ρ(4πr2dr) 
⌡ 3 r
0
 

begging to be simplified…

 
R
16π2ρ2
 r4d
U =  k ⌠
⌡ r
3 0

and solved.

16π2ρ2kR5
U = 
15

We should now replace charge density with a more useful expression.

Q Q 3Q
ρ =   =   = 
3 πR
4 3
V 4πR3

Actually, it's the square of charge density we should eliminate.

9Q2
ρ  = 
2

16π2R6

So let's do it.

16π2kR5 9Q2
U =   
15 16π2R6

Yay algebra!

]]6
3kQ2
U = 
5R
b. A half sized sphere has half the charge and half the volume but not half the radius. It's the cube root of a
half the radius.
V 4 ⎛ r ⎞3
4 3
V =   πr  ⇒   =   π⎜ ⎟
3 2 3 ∛2
⎝ ⎠

c. A half sphere then has energy equal to…

3k(Q/2)2 ∛2  
U½ =   = 
5(R/∛2) 4U

d. and two of them have energy equal to…

∛2  
2U½ = 
2 U

e. I think it's more interesting to express the weird fraction as a decimal.

2U½ ∛2
 =   = 0.62996…
U 2

f. Splitting a charged sphere in half reduces potential energy to 63% — or results in a loss of 37%, if you
prefer. (This assumes the two spheres are infinitely far away from each other, so their interaction adds no additional
potential energy.)
g. Here's how I'd like to approach this problem. Start by determining the electric potential energy of a 23592U
nucleus using the equation derived in part a.
3kQ2
U = 
5R
3(8.99 × 109 N m2/C2)(92 × 1.60 × 10−19 C)2
U = 
5(5.8337 × 10−15 m)
 
U = 2.00 × 10−10 J
 

h. Convert that into megaelectronvolts by dividing by the elementary charge (to get it into electronvolts) and
also by a million (since the prefix mega means a million).
2.00 × 10−10 J
U = 
(1.60 × 10−19 C)(1,000,000)
 
U = 1252 MeV
 

i. Then take 37% of that.

]]7
j. ∆U = 0.370(1252 MeV) = 463 MeV

k. This is about twice what I expected, but I'll have to figure out the discrepancy some other time.

]]8

You might also like