CLT Handbook
CLT Handbook
CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
CLT
CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
Addresses
Head Office
570, boul. St-Jean
Pointe-Claire, QC
Canada H9R 3J9
514 630-4100
www.fpinnovations.ca
Edited by
Sylvain Gagnon
and Ciprian Pirvu
FPInnovations
Québec, QC
Special Publication SP-528E
2011
Contents
Introduction
1
C h a p t e r
to cross-laminated timber
Cross-laminated
2
C h a p t e r
timber manufacturing
Structural design
C h a p t e r
3 of cross-laminated timber elements
Seismic performance
4
C h a p t e r
of cross-laminated timber buildings
Connections in
C h a p
ter
5 cross-laminated timber buildings
Vibration performance
7
C h a p t e r
of cross-laminated timber floors
Fire performance
C h a p
ter
8 of cross-laminated timber assemblies
Acoustic performance
9
C h a p t e r
of cross-laminated timber assemblies
Environmental performance
C h a p t e r
11 of cross-laminated timber
C h a p Lifting and
ter
12 handling of CLT elements
Preface
FPInnovations’ Building Systems Research Program has been generating technical data to facilitate:
■
Platform Frame Wood Construction
■
Heavy Timber Frame Construction
■
Cross-Laminated Timber Construction
Multi-disciplinary teams working in cooperation with the design and construction community
and research alliances have contributed greatly to the application of Platform Frame and Heavy Timber
Frame systems together with hybrid systems in Canada.
Cross-laminated timber (CLT), an emerging successful system from Europe, has been identified
by the forest products industry, the research and wood design communities as a new opportunity
for increasing the use of wood in non-traditional applications.
Building on the European experience, FPInnovations has prepared this peer-reviewed CLT Handbook to:
■
Provide immediate support for the design and construction of CLT systems as alternative solutions
in building codes;
■
Provide technical information for implementation of CLT systems in building codes and standards.
This FPInnovations CLT Handbook, prepared under the Transformative Technologies Program
of Natural Resources Canada, provides technical information relating to manufacturing,
all aspects of design and construction, and environmental considerations.
Acknowledgements
The completion of such an exhaustive manual on this new, but very promising technology was a great
venture that would not have been possible without the contribution of many people and numerous
national and international organizations.
First and most of all, we would like to express our special thanks to all researchers and technicians
at FPInnovations who, through their work and knowledge, contributed to the writing of individual
chapters. To the same extent, special thanks go to all reviewers and collaborators from external sources
who shared their precious time and expertise in improving this manual.
We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to Natural Resources Canada for the financing and
support provided through the Transformative Technologies Program. We also wish to acknowledge the full
assistance and support provided by FPInnovations’ management: Pierre Lapointe, Jim Dangerfield,
Alan Potter, Hervé Deschênes, Richard Desjardins and Erol Karacabeyli.
Our very special thanks to Madeline Leroux, who did very well in transforming ideas and concepts into
drawings. Thanks also to Norine Young, Marie-Claude Thibault and Bill Deacon for the editing review;
to Odile Fleury for her help in bibliographic references; and to Richard Gosselin for his appreciated
experienced advices. The graphic design and layout was performed by Propage (www.propage.com).
Sylvain Gagnon
Funding for this publication
was provided by
©2011, FPInnovations®
ISSN 1925-0495
ISBN 978-0-86488-547-0
www.fpinnovations.ca
cross-laminated timber construction
Building enclosure design of
CHAPTER
Authors
10
Graham Finch, P.Eng., Dipl.T, M.A.Sc., EIT, RDH Building Engineering Ltd.
Dave Ricketts, P.Eng., Principal, RDH Building Engineering Ltd.
Jieying Wang, Ph.D., FPInnovations
Constance Thivierge, Eng., M.Sc., FPInnovations
Paul Morris, Ph.D., FPInnovations
Peer Reviewers
Mario D. Gonçalves, Eng., Principal, Patenaude-Trempe Inc.
Mark Lawton, Eng., Principal, Morrison Hershfield Ltd.
Annette Neylon, P.Eng., C.Eng., M.Sc., Associated Engineering
Douglas L. Watts, P.Eng., MAIBC, CP, BEP, LEED AP, Read Jones Christoffersen Ltd.
Financial support for this study was provided by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) under the Transformative
Technologies Program, which was created to identify and accelerate the development and introduction of
products such as cross-laminated timber in North America.
FPInnovations expresses its thanks to its industry members, NRCan (Canadian Forest Service), the Provinces
of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Québec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick,
Newfoundland and Labrador, and the Yukon Territory for their continuing guidance and financial support.
Cross-laminated timber (CLT) has become popular in Europe for the prefabricated construction of wall, roof
and flooring elements. The use of CLT in North America is gaining interest in both the construction and wood
industries. Several North American manufacturers are in the process of product and manufacturing assessment or
have already started pilot production.
For general principles of durability by design, the Best Practice Guide for Wood-Frame Envelopes (CMHC,
1999) and the Building Enclosure Design Guide – Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings (HPO, 2010)
should be referred to for the design and construction of CLT buildings. The use of prefabricated CLT panels does
not change the basic heat, air and moisture control design criteria for an exterior wall or roof assembly. However,
different from conventional stick-built wood-frame buildings, the design of CLT building enclosures requires
additional attention due to the unique characteristics of the product. CLT panels are massive solid wood elements
and therefore have low vapour permeability and may provide a considerable level of insulation. They have a certain
level of inherent air tightness but usually require an additional air barrier. The panels may absorb a large amount
of moisture when exposed to excessive wetting and the consequent drying may be slow due to the mass of wood
in such panels.
This chapter focuses on best practice heat, air and moisture control strategies for wall assemblies that utilize CLT
panels in North American climate zones. The overlying strategies are to place insulation in such a way that the
panels are kept warm and dry, to prevent moisture from being trapped or accumulating within the panel, and to
control airflow through the panels, and at the joints and interfaces between them.
It is intended that these guidelines should assist practitioners in adapting CLT construction to North American
conditions and ensuring a long life for their buildings. However, these guidelines are not intended to substitute
for the input of a professional building scientist. This may be required in some jurisdictions, such as Vancouver BC,
and is recommended in all areas at least until such time as CLT construction becomes common practice.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
iii
Acknowledgements ii
Abstract iii
List of Tables v
List of Figures v
1 Introduction 1
2 Heat, Air and Moisture Control Strategies 3
2.1 Heat, Air and Moisture Control Strategies 3
2.1.1 Choosing a Suitable Exterior Insulation Material 4
2.2 Vapour Flow Control 5
2.2.2 CLT Panels as Vapour Control Layer 6
2.3 Rainwater and Exterior Moisture Control 6
2.4 Air Flow Control 7
3 Recommended CLT Panel Conceptual Design 9
3.1 Exterior Wall Assembly 9
3.2 Roof Assemblies 13
3.3 Detailing Considerations: Installation of Windows 17
3.4 Detailing Considerations: At Grade 19
4 Control of Moisture during Construction 21
5 Wood Preservative Treatment for Durability 22
6 Conclusions 23
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
iv
List of Figures
Figure 1 CLT panel constructed of three layers of cross-laminated board lumber to create a solid
wood panel suitable for prefabrication of whole wall, floor and roof elements 2
Figure 2 Best practice rainwater management strategy for CLT wall assembly. Detail shows a ventilated
and drained cladding rainscreen system where primary cladding and secondary drainage planes
are provided in addition to ventilation behind the cladding. This is typical of other exterior
insulated rainscreen wall assemblies. 7
Figure 3 Exterior insulated rainscreen clad CLT exterior wall assembly showing material sequencing
and schematic window penetration details 10
Figure 4 Cladding support strategy using vertical furring through rigid insulation board 11
Figure 5 Cladding support strategy using two layers of rigid insulation and two strapping members:
this configuration allows for the use of shorter screws and greater insulation thicknesses while
minimizing thermal bridging 12
Figure 6 Cladding support strategy using stud framing attached directly to CLT panel with semi-rigid
or batt insulation between framing 13
Figure 7 Top view of exterior insulated rainscreen clad CLT exterior wall transition to CLT sloped roof
assembly showing material sequencing 14
Figure 8 Bottom view of exterior insulated rainscreen clad CLT exterior wall transition to CLT sloped
roof assembly showing material sequencing 15
Figure 9 CLT flat roof detail showing material sequencing of a conventional roofing assembly with tie-in
to parapet of CLT wall 16
Figure 10 Window installation schematic using sloped wood sill and plywood box liner 18
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
v
Cross-laminated timber (CLT) has become popular in Europe for the prefabricated construction of wall, roof,
and flooring elements. The use of CLT in North America is gaining interest in both the construction and wood
industries. Several North American manufacturers are in the process of product and manufacturing assessment
or have already started pilot production.
CLT panels are typically constructed by laminating three or more layers of lumber together, with each layer
rotated 90° relative to the neighbouring layers to create a solid wood panel. The lumber is most commonly
adhered using a structural adhesive, with or without edge-gluing between lamina in the same layer. Manufacturing
methods and lamina quality may have an impact on the final product properties but they do not affect the overall
design strategy.
For general principles of durability by design, the Best Practice Guide for Wood-Frame Envelopes (CMHC,
1999) and the Building Enclosure Design Guide – Wood-Frame Multi-Unit Residential Buildings (HPO, 2010)
should be referred to for the design and construction of CLT buildings. The use of prefabricated CLT panels does
not change the basic heat, air and moisture control design criteria for an exterior wall or roof assembly. However,
different from conventional stick-built wood-frame buildings, the design of CLT building enclosures requires
additional attention due to the unique characteristics of the product. CLT panels are massive solid wood elements
and therefore have low vapour permeability and may provide a considerable level of insulation. They have a certain
level of inherent air tightness but usually require an additional air barrier. The panels may absorb a large amount of
moisture when exposed to excessive wetting and the consequent drying may be slow due to the mass
of wood in such panels.
Although occasionally used in this way experimentally, CLT panels are not a cladding material and are not
designed to be exposed to the exterior environment. They are a moisture sensitive structural assembly, and
therefore must be protected from rain and other moisture sources through the use of properly designed
wall assemblies.
This chapter focuses on best practice heat, air and moisture control strategies for wall assemblies that utilize
CLT panels in North American climate zones. The overlying strategies are to place insulation in such a way that
the panels are kept warm and dry, to prevent moisture from being trapped or accumulating within the panel,
and to control airflow through the panels, and at the joints and interfaces between them.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
1
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
2
Unlike stick-built wood-frame wall assemblies, where fibreglass batt insulation is traditionally placed between
the studs, CLT panels are solid and therefore require insulation, placed appropriately, on one side of the panel.
Being laminated solid wood, CLT inherently offers a nominal amount of insulation. Softwood species which
typically make up a CLT panel provide an R-value of approximately R-1.2 h·ft2·°F/Btu per inch, (i.e. R-4.2 for
a 3 ½ in. thick panel). While this inherent R-value is a good start, additional insulation must also be provided for
the wall assembly to meet local energy code requirements. In most Canadian jurisdictions, a nominal insulation
in the range of R-20 (RSI 3.52 K·m²/W) may be required in walls. In the case of this 3 ½ in. panel, it would be
necessary to add other insulating material with a minimum R-value of R-16 to the CLT wall assembly.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
3
The placement of the insulation may significantly affect the moisture levels and durability of the wood panel
in service. In all climate zones, most types of insulation should be placed on the exterior side of the CLT panels.
This will keep the wood in a relatively constant warm and dry indoor environment and reduce the risk of moisture
damage. Section 2.1.1 shows that the use of vapour permeable insulation materials such as mineral or wood
fibreboards are recommended in lieu of less vapour permeable foam plastics. Where wood fibre insulation boards
are used outside the weather resistant barrier, the wood should be treated to minimize water uptake and possible
fungal growth, and wall penetrations properly detailed to prevent wetting of the insulation.
CLT panels themselves may offer aesthetic benefits and may be left exposed on the interior side to showcase the
solid wood finish if the fire safety and acoustic requirements allow. This is another reason why thermal insulation
should be placed on the exterior side of the panel. When used in certain building types, some jurisdictions may
require that the interior exposed wood surface be covered with gypsum drywall or other non-combustible finish to
meet fire safety requirements. In this scenario, it might be seen as desirable to place insulation on the interior side
of the panel; however, this wall assembly is not recommended as the CLT panel will be more vulnerable to wetting
caused by vapour diffusion from the interior, or wetting from rainwater or solar driven moisture from the exterior.
Both rigid mineral fibre and wood fibre insulation boards are vapour permeable and have adequate R-values of
R-3.5 to R-4.0 h·ft2·°F/Btu per inch of thickness depending on density and other factors. In a jurisdiction requiring
R-20 to R-30 (RSI 3.52 to 5.28 K·m²/W) of nominal insulation, 4 to 7 in. (102 to 178 mm) of rigid wood or
mineral fibre insulation board would be necessary.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
4
Extruded polystyrene (XPS) or expanded polystyrene (EPS) may also be sufficiently rigid to screw furring
(strapping) through; however, the vapour permeability of these foam plastic insulations is relatively low, which
reduces the drying capacity of the CLT panel and may trap moisture within the wood panels. Modeling has shown
that drying through 3 to 5 in. of either EPS or XPS on the exterior side of a CLT assembly is slow, and can lead to
damage to CLT panels that are initially wet, wetted during construction, or exposed to humid indoor conditions
or a rainwater leak during service. The use of foam plastic insulation products is not ideal for insulating CLT wall
assemblies, particularly for a heating-dominated climate, because of their low permeability and the consequently
reduced drying capacity.
Less rigid, but vapour-permeable insulation materials including semi-rigid fibreglass or mineral wool boards
commonly available in North America, are also suitable for exterior insulating CLT panels, but require additional
framing on the exterior of the panels for cladding attachment. Because furring to support the cladding cannot
be nailed through these less-dense insulation boards, 2x4 or 2x6 studs or intermittent wood blocks need to be
attached or framed to the exterior of the CLT panels for cladding support. Semi-rigid insulation boards would
then be placed tightly between the wood framing.
In a traditional wood-frame wall assembly, vapour flow control is achieved on the inside surface of the batt
insulation using a sheet of either asphalt impregnated kraft paper (a vapour retarder), polyethylene (a vapour
barrier), or in some cases application of a vapour retarding paint on the gypsum board.
The vapour permeance of a 3½ in. thick softwood CLT panel is less than 30 ng/Pa·s·m2 (~0.5 US perms) at normal
indoor RH levels, based on the typical vapour permeance of solid softwood. Therefore, the CLT panel itself will
control the flow of vapour through the assembly in most situations. This property must be considered in the design
of a wall assembly and should be used as a design advantage instead of disadvantage. This further highlights the
importance of placing insulation on the exterior side of the CLT panel to ensure the vapour retarding layer is on
the warm side of the insulation.
In order to comply with the prescriptive requirements of some local building codes, the use of a vapour barrier
material may be contemplated in design. However, the use of an additional interior vapour control layer (i.e.
vapour retarder paint, impermeable finish or polyethylene sheet) can limit drying to the interior. Therefore,
when gypsum sheathing is used on the interior surface of the CLT panel, the vapour permeance of the paint
or wall finish should be carefully considered. This is particularly important in warmer humid climates where
the predominant vapour drive is inwards. The installation of other materials within CLT panel assemblies which
restrict panel drying, including foam plastic insulation and self-adhered bituminous membranes on the outside
surface of the panels is not recommended as they will limit drying to the exterior. These recommendations apply to
all climate zones on the principle that assemblies utilizing CLT panels should be designed to allow vapour to flow
readily out of the assembly.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
5
The vapour permeance of softwood lumber at normal indoor RH levels of 30 to 50% generally ranges from
less than 10 ng/Pa·s·m2 to as much as 110 ng/ Pa·s·m2 (0.17 to 1.9 US perms) for a 25 mm (1 in.) thick piece
of lumber. For a CLT panel thickness of 89 mm (3½ in.), the total vapour permeance would range from less than
3 ng/Pa·s·m2 to 30 ng/Pa·s·m2 (0.05 to 0.5 US perms). Following the performance levels intended in building
code requirements, the CLT panels themselves may meet the requirements for both a vapour retarder and
a vapour barrier.
This strategy as it applies to CLT panel walls dictates that a weather resistant barrier (WRB) will be either
mechanically fastened or adhered to the panels by the manufacturer in the factory or by the contractor
immediately after the CLT panels are erected on site. This will keep the panels relatively dry through the early
stages of delivery and construction. In line with the vapour open design philosophy and vapour control discussion,
the WRB material should have a high vapour permeance, (i.e. a house wrap or comparable product).
As shown in Figure 2, the WRB should then be covered with vapour permeable rigid insulation boards. Typically,
a cladding, such as fibre-cement board and stucco, would then need to be structurally attached to the CLT
panels. Cladding would not be attached directly to the CLT panels through insulation, because long screws
(> 6 to 8 in.) would be necessary for every attachment point. For cladding attachment, continuous vertical furring
(strapping) strips should be screwed through the rigid insulation to the CLT panel and the cladding should then
be attached to the furring with short fasteners. Depending on loading conditions, a structural analysis of this
cladding attachment scheme may be required. The gap between the furring strips creates an air space behind the
cladding, which is beneficial for both drainage and ventilation. This air space should, at minimum, be vented and
drained (opened at the bottom) or ideally ventilated and drained (i.e. by providing openings in the cladding
at both the top and bottom).
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
6
The practice of back-ventilating sidings such as wood, hardboard, and cement board is recommended by most
manufacturers to better ensure the long-term performance of their products. It is also beneficial to provide
an outlet for inward driven moisture from more absorptive claddings such as brick, stucco, stone and other
porous materials.
The cladding surface will shed the majority of the rainwater load on the wall; however, it is not the only line of
water penetration resistance. Moisture that does penetrate past the cladding will either run down the backside
of the cladding, the strapping, the surface of the insulation, or the final line of protection, the sealed WRB. Any
moisture which penetrates the cladding must then be drained back out of the assembly using flashings attached
to the CLT panel behind the WRB at floor levels and around penetrations such as windows.
In a traditional wood-frame wall assembly, air flow has to be controlled with an air barrier approach using either:
sealed polyethylene, air-tight drywall, sealed sheathing or sealed sheathing membrane.
CLT is a massive wood component but the air-tightness of CLT panels is dependent on the joints between the
individual boards and the individual layers. Gaps between individual boards or layers and checking in boards may
occur due to shrinkage during storage, transportation and construction as a result of drying or cyclical wetting
and drying. Manufacturing processes such as edge-gluing between boards can help improve the air-tightness of the
panels. If the CLT panels are used as part of the air barrier assembly within a building, appropriate measures such
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
7
The primary air barrier system could be the weather resistant barrier (WRB) adhered or mechanically fastened
to the exterior of the panel (sealed WRB approach) or a carefully detailed drywall layer on the interior side of the
panel (air-tight drywall approach). The effective implementation of the air barrier strategy would then rely on the
details to achieve continuity at penetrations such as windows or doors, as well as at interfaces with floors, ceilings,
balconies, decks, roofs and interior partitions. The details for such transitions would be similar to those used
in traditional wood-frame construction. The use of the water resistive barrier is the preferred approach in most
situations because there are fewer penetration and interface details to address.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
8
Figures 5 and 6 illustrate two alternate cladding support framing strategies. Figure 5 shows two strapping members
attached through the insulation to the CLT panels. The first strapping member would typically be a 2x2, and the
second member a 2x2 or a size that suits the thickness of insulation. The first strapping member is attached to the
CLT panels with shorter 5 in. screws and the second is then attached to the first strapping member. This method
may be necessary where greater thicknesses of insulation are required (i.e. 6 in. insulation which would require
8 to 9 in. screws). It also offers benefits for detailing around penetrations, and allows the insulation to be installed
with staggered joints. Where less rigid mineral fibre insulation boards or batts are used, or where structural
analysis indicates a more rigid cladding support is needed, solid framing members (i.e. studs) would be required
to support the cladding. Figure 6 shows 2x6 framing lumber directly attached to the CLT panels—thermally
the least efficient of the systems discussed above.
Both the furring and framing members placed on the exterior of the WRB/air barrier should be protected
with some level of wood preservative such as borate, CA, ACQ, or CCA (for plywood only), depending on
the exposure and local building code requirements. Attention should be given to the selection of appropriate
corrosion-resistant fasteners suitable for use with the preservative chosen for wood treatment.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
9
Figure 3
Exterior insulated rainscreen clad CLT exterior wall assembly showing material sequencing
and schematic window penetration details
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
10
Figure 4
Cladding support strategy using vertical furring through rigid insulation board
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
11
Figure 5
Cladding support strategy using two layers of rigid insulation and two strapping members: this configuration
allows for the use of shorter screws and greater insulation thicknesses while minimizing thermal bridging
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
12
Figure 6
Cladding support strategy using stud framing attached directly to CLT panel with semi-rigid
or batt insulation between framing
The type of roofing material will dictate the framing support structure on the exterior side of the CLT panels.
Typically, this will involve the installation of purlins or intermittent structures and sheathing to support the
roofing material. In this application, the CLT panel functions as the structural base and interior finish for the
assembly. This type of exterior insulated assembly lends itself well to the use of metal or tile roofing materials.
Figures 7 and 8 show material sequencing of a sloped CLT roof and tie-in details to a CLT wall assembly at
the underside.
CLT panels may also be used in flat or low-slope roof assemblies—in which case using a conventional roofing
assembly would be best practice to protect the CLT panel. Similar to a conventional above-deck insulated wood-
frame roof with plywood, an air/vapour barrier, insulation and exposed roofing membrane is placed on top of the
CLT panel. Figure 9 shows material sequencing of a low-slope CLT roof and tie-in details to a CLT wall assembly.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
13
Figure 7
Top view of exterior insulated rainscreen clad CLT exterior wall transition to CLT sloped roof
assembly showing material sequencing
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
14
Protected underside of
CLT panel should be
treated with suitable
finish and left exposed
or covered with a
perforated soffit panel
Figure 8
Bottom view of exterior insulated rainscreen clad CLT exterior wall transition to CLT sloped roof
assembly showing material sequencing
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
15
Self-adhered air
and vapour barrier
membrane on top side
of CLT panel and onto
back side of CLT wall
CLT wall assembly parapet
Figure 9
CLT flat roof detail showing material sequencing of a conventional roofing assembly with tie-in
to parapet of CLT wall
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
16
A general schematic of a window installation is provided in Figure 10. Continuity of the air barrier and water
shedding surface are critical and can be detailed in a number of different ways. Key points to consider when
detailing include:
→ Air barrier continuity must be retained from the WRB at the CLT surface, through the rough opening
and to the window frame.
→ The membranes used at the window sill should preferably be vapour permeable to prevent water from being
trapped within the CLT panel or plywood.
→ Water should not be drained behind the insulation/WRB interface below a window or other penetration.
Water should be drained to the exterior of the insulation or directly to the exterior where possible.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
17
Window is air-sealed
around the interior
perimeter of the frame
as part of the air barrier
assembly
Vapour permeable
waterproofing membrane
wraps sill of plywood liner
(water is not directed
to the WRB interface
behind the insulation)
Figure 10
Window installation schematic using sloped wood sill and plywood box liner
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
18
The exterior insulated above grade CLT details easily into an exterior insulated below grade basement wall.
Flashing is provided at the base of the above grade CLT wall which can be profiled to cover the below grade
insulation. This insulation (typically extruded polystyrene, XPS) is placed on the exterior of the concrete and
should be placed tight to the underside of the flashing. Since this can provide hidden access for termites,
the XPS insulation should be borate treated or the flashing should be installed in such a manner to act as a termite
shield where this hazard exists. Other termite management measures may be required by local building codes
as discussed below.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
19
Minimum of 8 in.
between grade
and bottom of CLT panel
Figure 11
At-grade CLT wall assembly schematic
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
20
CLT panels are much more massive than plywood or standard dimension lumber, and will take a very long
time to dry out if allowed to become wet. Therefore, prevention of wetting should be a priority in construction.
Product standards may require a certain moisture content for finished CLT panels and building codes may require
a moisture content of less than 19% at any location within a panel (surface, core or edge) before it is closed in.
In addition, it is important to keep the panels at a stable operating moisture content, because moisture related
expansion and contraction may damage the laminations and lead to distortion of the panels.
CLT panels should be temporarily protected by use of water-resistant sheet membranes or other effective methods
to reduce environmental moisture uptake until they are protected by the building roof. Temporary protection can
be attached in the manufacturing facility and should be maintained while stored on site. This protection should
also be maintained as the panels are erected in place in order to protect the panels until the roof or other elements
such as the sheathing membrane (WRB) provide adequate protection. If the protection is an impermeable
material, it will need to be removed during construction.
Even with these precautions, it is likely that CLT panels will experience some wetting during transportation or
construction, and be installed with built-in moisture in localized areas. Therefore, the most durable wall design
strategies will keep the CLT panel warm (i.e. exterior insulated) and allow for excess moisture to escape fast
enough (i.e. vapour open concept) from the assembly to prevent damage and deterioration.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
21
In terms of treatment, preservatives used for treatment of lamina prior to manufacture of glulam posts and
beams can generally be applied to CLT wall panels. Oil-based treatments used for industrial glulam may not be
a preferred approach due to VOC emissions. Using pressure treated lumber for boards of the exterior lamination,
applying post-lamination surface treatments to the exterior and end grains, or using boron rods for local
protection may all help.
In areas with a high termite hazard, such as the Southeastern United States, multiple lines of defense should be
used to prevent termite damage to CLT panels. Appropriate site termite prevention and the use of termite soil
barriers such as termiticide soil treatment, and slab and foundation detailing to prevent termite intrusion should
be taken into consideration during design. Preservative treated wood is also recommended for CLT panels and
other wood furring and framing to prevent termite damage. In addition, termite control measures should also
be provided to below grade insulation materials such as XPS.
The use of fire retardants may help meet fire safety requirements and warrant the use of exposed CLT panels
for aesthetic purposes. Some fire retardants contain boron and will also provide decay and termite resistance.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
22
It is intended that guidelines included in this chapter should assist practitioners in adapting CLT construction
to North American conditions and ensuring a long life for their buildings. However, these guidelines are not
intended to substitute for the input of a professional building scientist. This may be required in some jurisdictions,
such as Vancouver, BC and is recommended in all areas at least until such time as CLT construction becomes
common practice.
ChapTER 10 Enclosure
23
Head Office
570, boul. St-Jean
Pointe-Claire, QC
Canada H9R 3J9
514 630-4100
www.fpinnovations.ca
®FPInnovations, its marks and logos are registred trademarks of FPInnovations. Special Publication SP-528E
CLT
CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER
Addresses
Head Office
570, boul. St-Jean
Pointe-Claire, QC
Canada H9R 3J9
514 630-4100
www.fpinnovations.ca