Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

INTRODUCTION
Baran block was awarded on July 28, 2010 covering an area of 2475.26 sq.kms falling
in the district of Dadu (Sind) and Lasbella (Baluchistan) in Zone-3. The nearest major
city is Dadu which is about 20 Km to the west, the nearest town Johi is 2Km away from
the concession area.

The major trend of Topography of Baran Block is hilly but accessible. On the basis of
topographical, Raster and elevation data and satellite images Baran Block is subdivided
into three regions Northern, Southern and Central region

In the vicinity of Baran Block the major Gas producing fields are Zamzama, Bhit, Bhadra
and recently commercially viable gas was discovered in Rehman-01 well of Kirthar
block. The proven Gas reservoir in this region is Pab sandstone formation, which is also
expected to encounter in the Baran block which will be confirmed after seismic survey,
drilling of exploratory well and extensive testing.

Fig 1 : Location Map of Baran Block

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Data Purchase & Preliminary Interpretation:

After award of Baran Block, G & G data review was carried out in LMKR (Islamabad)
from July 26 to July 29, 2010. On geophysical side two types of data had been
reviewed, that is “Seismic processed data” and “VSP data for different wells.
Total 45 no of seismic lines were reviewed as shown in (Fig: 2) and on the basis of that
a working map was prepared by marking different highs and lows on the seismic lines.

Fig 2 : Showing Seismic Lines Reviewed

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

On the basis of that working map four geophysical leads were marked and lead map is
prepared and seismic lines were bifurcated lead wise and these leads were named as
Lead A, B, C, D. as shown in (Fig: 3)

Fig 3 : Showing Seismic Leads Map

A priority is then defined for these leads on the basis of seismic lines reviewed and by
preliminary interpretation.” Lead A” is given top priority on the basis of following
conditions that is “Lead A” straddles in the southern part of the north eastern side of the
Baran block and extends further outside the block boundary in south west of Zamzama
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

field. On the basis of data reviewed it was revealed that this lead is oriented NW-SE
bounded by a fault on its western side with

On priority wise “Lead D” is given 2nd rank. This structure straddles in the southern part
of the Baran block. This structure is oriented in NW-SE with approximate area of 10
Sq.kms with a structural relief of about 30 msec. This lead has seismic coverage of
about 325 L.Km data.

In initial phase it is decided to work on these two leads. Therefore 23 seismic lines
covering these leads have been finalized for purchase and to do interpretation while the
remaining two leads and there seismic data will be worked out in future.

After a detailed preliminary interpretation of Lead A in northern part of Baran Block, it is

decided to work initially on northern part of Baran area containing two leads, Lead A &
Lead B. To delineate Lead B a second data review was carried out in LMKR
(Islamabad). In this review a special emphasis was on the seismic data lying in Lead B
and on the basis of preliminary working during data review about 224 L.Km data was
purchased. Then after data purchase an in house interpretation is in progress for further
working.

In house Interpretation:
Lead A has been ranked on first due to easy accessibility, flat
topography and existence of petroleum system in nearby Zamzama field. This
lead contains 10 seismic lines covering 400.55 L.km. Some portion of these lines
lies inside the block boundary and some portion on outside the Baran Block
Boundary. Initially an in house interpretation was started on 400 L.Km data of
Lead A marked on the basis of data reviewed .Horizons are marked and mapping
has been done by incorporation the VSP data of Zamzama-01 and Zamzama-02
wells on Geographix system. Preliminary mapping has been done on Pab level
because Pab is target horizons in Baran area because Pab is proven reservoir in
this part and a TWT structure map has been prepared at Pab
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Level as shown in (Fig: 5). Sequence of horizons picked during interpretation with the
help of VSP data is as follows and is shown in (Fig: 11)

1. Siwalik
2. Gaj
3. Kirthar
4. Lakki
5. Dunghan
6. Girdo
7. Khadro
8. Pab

Geophysical Database Used for Interpretation:

Following geophysical database has been used for interpretation in Lead A

Lead A Data
Sr.No. Line Name FSP LSP G.I LKm Remarks

1 GOR04-01 174 912 25 18.45 Digital

2 HPK96-03 1005 2859 25 46.35 Digital

3 HPK96-04 1003 1507 25 12.6 Digital

4 HPK96-08 887 2173 25 32.15 Digital

5 O-806-JH-11 103 545 100 44.2 Digital

6 O-806-JH-12 103 638 100 53.5 Digital

7 O-806-JH-14 103 604 100 50.1 Digital

8 O-806-JH-15 103 567 100 46.4 Digital

9 O-806-JH-16 103 562 100 45.9 Digital

10 O-806-JH-17 101 610 100 50.9 Digital

          400.55  

Fig 4 : Map of the Geophysical Data Used for Interpretation

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Fig 5 : TWT Structure Map at Pab Level

During interpretation, there are lot of issues regarding data quality, the main thing is that
data is of different vintages. Some seismic lines are of 1980 vintage and some are of
2001 vintage. This created lot of problems including misties and poor fault definitions
etc.
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

The main problems evolved during interpretation are discussed below.

Problems in Vintage Data:

A1: The data available for interpretation is of 1979 vintage shot by OGDC long time back.
OGDCL had shallow level objectives and during processing they did not emphasis on deeper
part.

A2: OGIL holds deeper objectives, i.e. Pab sandstone which is variable in depth in different
parts of Baran Block. In Lead –A of northern part of Block, Re-processing objective has been
marked in the interval of 1600ms-3100ms and the horizons in this interval are Lakki, Pab and
Mughalkot as shown in (Enclosure 2).

A3: Seismic line 806-JH-16 has been marked as key line for selection of parameters and
testing due to the line passing through the crust of the structure as shown in (Fig:10).

A4: Seismic lines of JH vintage have low frequency and low amplitude data which resulted in
the improper resolution of two seismic reflections. The low frequency data has main impact on
either side of the fault as shown in (Fig: 6)

A5: Fault definitions are not properly resolved and due to steep dips on both sides of the
fault, due to this reason horizon correlation is big challenge on both sides of the fault as shown
in (Fig: 9)

A6: Velocity modeling technique is not utilized as appropriate as it is used now a day.
Comprehensive velocity modeling is required for the proper placement of horizons at their true
positions and to reduce the pseudo effects.

A7: Mistie of different vintages is major concern for the reprocessing of the data. Mistie of
20-30ms is evident on the interpreted data. The intersection between seismic lines HPK96-08
and 806-JH-15 reveals a mistie of approx 30msec which needs to be addressed in the re-
processing as shown in (Fig: 7 & 8).
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Fig 6 : Showing Amplitude Decay

Fig 7 : Showing Mistie between two Lines

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Fig 8 : Showing Zoomed out Display of Mistie

Fig 9 : Showing Poor fault definition due to Low frequency

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Fig 10: Interpreted Key Line in Lead -A

Fig 11 : Showing Horizons Picked

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Reprocessing:
On the basis of technically highlighted issues, the seismic reprocessing of the processed
data is really an important step required before proceeding towards the planning of new
seismic acquisition to fulfill the commitment with Government of Pakistan

Objectives of Reprocessing:
One important aspect of data processing is to uncover genuine reflections by suppressing all
unwanted energies (noise of various types).The objective of seismic data processing is to
convert the information recorded in the field to a form that can be used for geological
interpretation. Through processing we are enhancing signal to noise ratio, removing the seismic
impulse from the trace and repositioning the reflectors to its true location (NMO, DMO and
Migration), thereby making it into a more palatable form. Some of the major objectives of
reprocessing are as follows

1. To clearly establish an in-depth understanding of structural trends, reservoir

boundaries and trapping mechanism in the area.
2. To improve resolutions of structural complexities as the area has complex
tectonics.
3. Placing the horizons at their exact subsurface positions. With best possible
vertical and horizontal resolutions.
4. Study and delineate major and minor faults and complex structures associated
with faults.
5. To resolve all miss-ties problems by developing a consistent static pseudo 3D
model of refraction statics computed by using first arrivals where appropriate.
6. Clear identification of litho boundaries that supports our regional as well as local
geology of the area.
7. True velocity picking that flatten our CDP gathers to improve the data quality
8. Better understanding & delineation of the primary and secondary targets
throughout the area
9. To locate and define the structures with maximum possible clarity including all
major and minor fault systems and blocks in order to establish reservoir
boundaries.
10. To preserve amplitude and reduce the noise.
11. To improve the fault definition and signature.
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

12. Accurate placement of reflectors at their actual sub surface positions with
maximum possible vertical and lateral resolution.
13. Reflectors continuity and prominence, both vertically and horizontally.

Vintage Data Processing Information:

OGIL has vintage seismic data of different companies and each has
different processing sequence. The vintage data processing sequence is as follows.

806-JH

 Input SegY
 Output WGC Code 4 Format
 Output Data Length 6000MS at 4 msec
 GEOMETRY DEFINITION
Elevation Statistics
Datum - 0m
Replacement Velocity-2000 msec
 AMPLITUDE RECOVERY
Geometric Spread CompensationA – 1(TWT * Vrms2)
Offset Weighing 7 Times Far to Near
 ZONE MUTE
Filter -120msecTaper 3-25 Hz
Start - 70msec 360msec
End - 500msec 300msec
 ZONE ANOMALY PROCESSING Spike Removal
 Trace Editing - Bad Trace Edit
 DESIGNATURE DECONVOLUTION
Wavelet Length -400msec
Instrument Response Parameter 3//18 93/36Hz
Target Output 6/18 62/18Hz
 STATICS CORRECTIONS -160 msec Bulk Shift
Velocity Analysis - 2 km Interval
 Normal Moveout Correction
 SURFACE CONSISTANT RESIDUAL STATICS
Window 800-3200 msec
Maximum Shift 48 msec
 MUTE
Offset Time
420 4
450 50
1175 110
2700 2200
PRE-STACK SCALING
Instantaneous AGC 500 msec
 STACK DMO
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

GOR04-01

 Demultiplex
 Geometry Definition & Bad Trace Editing
 Minimum Phase Conversion
 F-X Noise Suppression
 Pre-Filtering(band Pass 6-90 Hz Zero Phase)
 Spherical Divergence Amplitude Compensation
 Surface Consistent Amplitude Compensation
 Predictive Deconvolution
0000-2400 msec gap-24 msec Operator Length-200 msec
2100-6000 msec gap-24 msec Operator Length-200 msec
 1st Velocity Analysis at every 1 KM Interval
 Refraction Static Correction
Final Datum – 0M, Replacement Velocity – 2000m/sec
 1st Surface Constituent Residual Statics Correction
Windows 700-3200 msec, Max Shift 24 msec; 9 trace model
 2nd Velocity Analysis at every 500 KM Interval
 2nd Surface Constituent Residual Statics Correction
Windows 700-3200 msec, Max Shift 16 msec; 9 trace model
 CDP Constituent Residual Statics
Model Trace 3, Max Shift 12 msec
 Common Offset Sort
 Kirchhoff’s DMO in Common Offset Domain
 Pre-Stack time Migration in Common Offset
 Final Velocity Analysis at 500m interval
 NMO & Final Mute & Stacking
 FX Residual migration
 Matching Filtering
 Spectral Whitening (10-50 Hz)
 Post Stack Random Noise Attenuation
 Time Variant Filtering
0S 12-75 Hz

1.5 S 10-60 Hz

2.5 S 8-50 Hz

4S 8-40 Hz

5S 08-35 Hz

 Amplitude Dynamic Equalization

 Windows Length 500 msec
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

PROCESSING SERVICES
Basic POSTM and PSTM, processing sequences may consist of steps given below, yet processor
has to optimize the sequences after rigorous experimentation in order to obtain the best
possible quality results as per entire satisfaction of operator. However these sequences may be
changed when and where necessary to arrive at a better quality of processed data as per
directions.
BASIC PROPOSED PROCESSING SEQUENCE:

Basic processing is of two types.

1. Pre-Stack Time Migration

2. Post stack Time Migration.

1: Pre-Stack Time Migration (PSTM)

Pre-stack Time Migration is done where we have complex structures and
to clearly define faults we need pre stack time migration. As in case of Baran Block we
have complex geometries, structures and we have lot of problems in faults identification
and reflectors continuity so to delineate all these problems Pre Stack Time Migration is
recommended.Proposed processing flow for Pre Stack Time Migration is as follows

2D-PRE-STACK TIME MIGRATION (PSTM)

01. TRANSCRIPTION
02. GEOMETRY
03. EDITING
04. TRUE AMPLITUDE RECOVERY
05. PRESTACK COHERENT NOISE ATTENU.
06. DECONVOLUTION
07. REFRACTION/TOMO STATICS
08. VELOCITY ANALYSIS (1st PASS)
09. RESIDUAL STATICS
10. VELOCITY ANALYSIS (2nd PASS)
11. NMO
12. MUTE
13. DECONVOLUTION BEFORE STACK
14. MULTIPLE ATTENUATION
15. VELOCITY MODELING
16. DATUM STATICS
17. PSTM
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

18. DATUM STATICS

19. VELOCITY ANALYSIS
20. STACK
21. RANDOM NOISE ATTENUATION
22. BLEND
23. BANDPASS FILTERING
24. TRACE EQUALIZATION
25. SCALING
26. PHASE MATCHING WITH WELL DATA
27. SCALING
28. PHASE MATCHING WITH WELL DATA

2: Post-Stack Time Migration (PSTM)

Post Stack Time Migration is the final step in processing

sequence, During processing it is done along with pre stack time migration Proposed
processing sequence for Post Stack Time Migration is as follows

2D-POST-STACK TIME MIGRATION (POSTM)

01.TRANSCRIPTION
02. GEOMETRY
03. EDITING
04. TRUE AMPLITUDE RECOVERY
05. PRESTACK COHERENT NOISE ATTENU.
06. DECONVOLUTION
07. REFRACTION/TOMO STATICS
08. VELOCITY ANALYSIS (1st PASS)
09. RESIDUAL STATICS
10. VELOCITY ANALYSIS (2nd PASS)
11. NMO
12. MUTE
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

13. DECONVOLUTION BEFORE STACK

14. MULTIPLE ATTENUATION
15. OFFSET BINNING
16. DMO
17. NMO
18. VELOCITY ANALYSIS (3rd PASS)
19. NMO
20. STACK
21. DATUM STATICS
22. RANDOM NOISE ATTENUATION
23. BLEND
24. POST STACK MIGRATION
25. BANDPASS FILTERING
26. TRACE EQUALIZATION
27. SCALING
28. PHASE MATCHING WITH WELL DATA

QUALITY CONTROL OF PROCESSING RESULTS

Company will evaluate each important step of processing during data processing. The following
processing results for each line of processing/ reprocessing program should be available to the
Company via email or ftp in CGM and SEG Y files.

1. Shot Records Quality: At least every tenth/twentieth shot record of each line before
and after all types of noise have been attenuated for review of shot records quality to be used
in processing.

2. 2D Refraction/Tomostatics Model: The refraction/tomostatics model of each line

should show near surface layers thickness and velocities. 2D refraction/tomostatics models for
all lines will be provided for review prior to production of 3D tomostatics model (optional).

3. Refraction/Tomostatics Stack: To review the quality of the stack after application of

refraction/tomostatics using first break tomography and to compare with field statics stack.

4. Residual static Stack: To review the quality of the stack after application of residual
static. The correct refraction/tomostatics and residual static solution will help to improve
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

continuity, wavelet amplitude and phase of the seismic data which will help to improve velocity
analysis and migration results.

5. Final Stack To review the quality of final stack and compare with final stack produce
from an in-field processing unit.

6. Post Stack Time Migration: To review the post stack time migration results, compare
with final stack and to see how far we achieve the objective to place reflected energy at the
sub-surface positions where it originated.

7. Pre Stack Time Migration: To review the pre stack time migration results and to see
improvement as compare to post stack time migration results. Post and pre stack time
migration will help us to determine how severe the degree of horizontal and vertical velocity
variations, the dip of reflectors to be accurately imaged and positioned where it originated.

8. DISPLAY SCALE FOR THE PROCESSING RESULTS:

Horizontal Scale: 1:25,000

Vertical Scale: 10 cm/sec

9. SIDE AND TOP LABELS FOR THE PROCESSING RESULTS.

The side labels of all display sections should include the acquisition and processing parameters
in meters while the top label of all display sections should have line intersections (Company will
provide data to generate line intersection with lines in the area), velocity boxes, profiles of
surface elevation in meter, shot, receiver and residual statics and CDP fold coverage.

Phase-1 & 2 Field Data Purchase:

Before reprocessing of seismic data, the first step was to purchase seismic field data
(Raw data), because field data is required for reprocessing. So in first step we will purchase raw
data priority wise and then we will proceed for reprocessing accordingly. Seismic field data was
reviewed during the 2nd phase data review in LMKR (Islamabad). Reprocessing is the first and
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

foremost step in the processing sequence and it commences with the reception of field tapes
and observers log. Field tape contains seismic data and observer’s log contains geographical
data (Shot/Receiver numbers, elevations, Latitude, Longitude etc).

The cost of raw data & its reprocessing cost are as under

Phase 1:

Seismic Reprocessing Options:

 Initially on the basis of preliminary working on the vintage data four (04) options have
been worked out.

Option-1:
In 1st option complete reprocessing of all the vintage data was bring into consideration. It holds
the following detail about the raw data purchase and reprocessing cost. Fig: 12 is showing the
seismic data selected only for Option-1 among the complete reprocessing schedule for
Northern part of Baran block.

Field Data:

Sr.No Line name Total Line Km

1 HPK96-04 12.65
2 HPK96-08 32.53
3 806-JH-12 53.8
4 806-JH-14 51.69
5 806-JH-15 46.5
6 806-JH-16 46
7 806-JH-17 50.90
8 GGOR04-01 20.24
  Total 314.31

Field Data Purchase Cost :

Total Cost of Option-1 Field Data = $20411.88

Output media 3490 (29 No of Tapes x$30) = $870

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Sub Total = $21281.88

20% Geodetic Charges = $4256.38

Grand Total: $25538.25

Reprocessing Data :

Sr.No  Line name Total Line Km

1 HPK96-04 12.69
2 HPK96-08 32.53
3 806-JH-12 53.8
806-JH-14 51.69
5 806-JH-15 46.7
6 806-JH-16 46.1
7 806-JH-17 50.90
8 GGOR04-01 22.02
  Total 316

Total Data: 316 Km

Reprocessing Cost: 316*150 = USD 47400

Total Cost (Data Purchase & Reprocessing) = $72938.25

 Below is the map showing seismic lines of Option-1 for data purchase & reprocessing
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Fig 12 : Showing Reprocessing Data (Option-1)

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Option-2:
After a detailed interpretation and discussion it was decided to concentrate only on those
seismic lines that are passing through Lead A. So it was decided to squeeze the data by looking
at the economics of the data. So in the above mentioned Option-1 , a seismic line 806-JH-14 is
exempted, and the rest of the data is taken as Option-2 for reprocessing.Fig:13 is showing list of
seismic data squeezed for reprocessing

Field Data

Sr.No  Line name Total Line Km

1 HPK96-04 12.69
2 HPK96-08 32.53
3 806-JH-12 53.8
4 806-JH-15 46.7
5 806-JH-16 46.1
6 806-JH-17 50.90
7 GGOR04-01 22.02
  Total 264.75

Field Data Purchase Cost :

Total Cost of Option-2 Field Data = $17528.75

Output media 3490 (28 No of Tapes x$30) = $840

Sub Total = $18368

20% Geodetic Charges = $3673.6

Grand Total = $22041.6

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Reprocessing Data & Cost:

Sr.No  Line name Total Line Km

1 HPK96-04 12.69
2 HPK96-08 20
3 806-JH-12 25.5
4 806-JH-15 37.8
5 806-JH-16 36.9
6 806-JH-17 30
7 GGOR04-01 22.02
  Total 184.91

Reprocessing Cost:
Total Data: 185 Km

Reprocessing Cost: 185*$150 = $27750

Total Cost (Data Purchase & Reprocessing) = $49791

 Below is the map showing seismic lines of Option-2 for data purchase & reprocessing
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Fig 13 : Showing Reprocessing Data (Option-2)

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Option-3
In next option, it was revealed that major portion of seismic lines is lying outside the Baran
Block, so we do not have any option in field data purchase but in seismic reprocessing we have
choice to select a range of shot points of seismic line. So in this option few shot points of
seismic lines are exempted, in this way we have squeezed some data for reprocessing. So in this
option field data of all the lines mentioned is to be purchased completely and reprocessing is
from shot point to shot point. Shot points are selected in such a way so that our structure area
should lie in these selected points

Field Data

Sr.No  Line name Total Line Km

1 806-JH-12 53.8
2 806-JH-15 46.7
3 806-JH-16 46.1
4 806-JH-17 50.90
5 GGOR04-01 22.02
  Total 219.52
Field Data Purchase Cost :
Total Cost of Option-3 Field Data = $14092.5

Output media 3490 (10 No of Tapes x$30) = $300

Sub Total = $14392.5

20% Geodetic Charges = $2878.5

Grand Total =
$17271
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Reprocessing Data :

Sr.No  Line name Total Line Km

1 806-JH-12 25.5
2 806-JH-15 37.8
3 806-JH-16 36.9
4 806-JH-17 30
GGOR04-01 22.02
  Total 152.22

Reprocessing Cost:
Total Data: 152 Km

Reprocessing Cost: 152*$150 = $22800

Total Cost (Data Purchase & Reprocessing) = $40071

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Fig 14 : Showing Reprocessing Data (Option-3)

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Option-4
In this option, the selection criteria for selection of seismic lines is to select only those parts of
seismic lines which are lying completely inside the Baran Block. In this option seismic line 806-
JH-17 is exempted because this line is lying completely outside the block and rest of the lines
are lying inside the block partially. The basic purpose of selection of seismic lines inside the
block is existence of structure and not its extents.

Field Data
Sr.No  Line name Total Line Km
1 806-JH-12 53.8
2 806-JH-15 46.7
3 806-JH-16 46.1
4 GGOR04-01 22.02
  Total 168.62

Field Data Purchase Cost :

Total Cost of Option-4 Field Data = $10545

Output media 3490 (9 No of Tapes x$30) = $270

Sub Total = $10545

20% Geodetic Charges = $2109

Grand Total = $12654

Reprocessing Data :

Sr.No  Line name Total Line Km

1 806-JH-12 15.5
2 806-JH-15 9.8
3 806-JH-16 9.9
4 GGOR04-01 8.42
  Total 43.62
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Reprocessing Cost:
Total Data: 43.62 Km

Reprocessing Cost: 43.62*$150 = $6543

Total Cost (Data Purchase & Reprocessing) = $19197

Fig 14: Highlighted Portion Showing Reprocessing Data (Option-4)

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Phase 2:

Lead B Data:

Sr No  Line name Inside Block Outside Block

1 GGOR04-02 21.23
2 GGOR04-03 24.53
3 GGOR04-05 18.2 0.85
4 GGOR04-07 21.43
  Total 85.39 0.85

Cost Summary for Phase-2 Field Data :

Data Falling inside the block-No of input tapes (19 No of Tapes x$50) = $950.00

Data Falling Outside the block-No of input tapes (0.85 No of Km x$75) = $63.75

Output media 3490 (12 No of Tapes x$30) = $360

Sub Total = $1373.75

20% Geodetic Charges = $274.75

Grand Total: $1648.50

Reprocessing Cost:

Total Data: 86.24 Km

Reprocessing Cost: 86.24*150 = USD 12936

Total Cost (Data Purchase & Reprocessing) = $14584

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Fig 15 : Showing Reprocessing Data (Phase-2)

 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Recommendations:
By keeping in view the comparison of all the proposed options, option-4 is
recommended for considerations due to following points.
1. At this stage, only those shot points of seismic data are recommended for
reprocessing which are lying inside the block to validate the structure.
2. Hold a reasonable data for validation of the structure. It may increase subject to
the suggestions (if any from vendor).

Option-4

Field Data
Sr.No Line name Total Line Km
1 806-JH-12 53.8
2 806-JH-15 46.7
3 806-JH-16 46.1
4 GGOR04-01 22.02
  Total 168.62
Field Data Purchase Cost :
Total Cost of Option-4 Field Data = $10545

Output media 3490 (9 No of Tapes x$30) = $270

Sub Total = $10545

20% Geodetic Charges = $2109

Grand Total = $12654

Reprocessing Data :

Sr.No  Line name Total Line Km

1 806-JH-12 15.5
2 806-JH-15 9.8
3 806-JH-16 9.9
4 GGOR04-01 8.42
  Total 43.62
Reprocessing Cost:
Total Data: 43.62 Km
 Seismic Data Reprocessing Programme

Reprocessing Cost: 43.62*$150 = $6543

Total Cost (Data Purchase & Reprocessing) = $19197