Ethics Final Module
Ethics Final Module
ETHICS
Qayser D.Siblante
ACTIVITY
Driftwood at Sea
a.) To which direction is the driftwood going?
b.) When can you or any person be like the driftwood?
ANALYSIS
1. Could Judas be held answerable/accountable for having betrayed Jesus?
2. On what factors (at least three) would you base Judas accountability?
ABSTRACTION
The moral person is endowed with an intellect and will. The "will" is what
“disposes” what the “the intellect proposes.” Reason conducts the study, research,
investigation, fact-finding. It uses logic, the principle of consistency, avoids fallacious
reasoning to come up with a truthful and accurate proposition. In a research study, the
product or work of reason is the body of facts gathered, organized, synthesized and
evaluated. The job of the will is to make a decisive conclusion.
The will is the faculty of the mind that is associated with decision making. It's the
one that says yes or no. This author says this, that author says that, all others are
saying the same thing. Now, decide with your will what you yourself should say or think.
Decision making which is an activity of the will can be developed. Early in life,
like children, one should already be given the opportunity to exercise his will, like being
trained to make choices from alternative. Do you want to eat or not? Rice or bread?
Coffee or tea? This is true of societies where a culture of choice give opportunities for
the development of the will. A culture of spoon feeding does not develop the will.
Banking education, a method of teaching where the teacher simply deposits facts and
concepts and withdraw the same periodically during quizzes and tests without
encouraging the students to think and reflect, does not promote the development of the
will.
Jean Paul Sartre, the French Philosopher, and the most popular existentialist
was saying that an individual person is nothing until he/she starts making decisions.
What ultimately constitutes who a person is are his/her decisions. The essence of being
a person equals his/her bundle of decisions. Apparently, the mark of the maturation of
culture is manifested through the development of a culture of moral strength or virtue, or
will power, its free will. “Free Will” is the “capacity of rational agents to choose a course
of action from among various alternatives.”
Free will is the ability to choose between different possible courses of action
unimpeded, the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants. It is the power of
self-determination. When the will is free, there is freedom.
To Hornedo (1972), the stuff of the free will is a multi-dimensional power, energy,
or strength. One is free to the degree that he has energy, that is, physically free to the
degree that he is physically strong; materially or economically free to the degree that he
is materially or economically strong, and so on.
Emphasis is made on what freedom is, and not on what it is not. To say that one
is free when there is an absence of obstacle is to give a picture of a weak person who
cannot walk to get out his room despite an open door. Freedom must not only be
understood as the absence of obstacle; it must be an autonomous energy. It is useless
talking about being free to move, walk, if you have not strength to move or walk. It is
useless saying you are free to go to Manila by bus, if you have no money for your fare.
Freedom implies power, energy, strength in all human dimensions, as the stuff of
freedom. A free person is one who is physically healthy and strong, psychologically
normal, financially stable. It is useless shouting in the streets for "economic freedom” if
one is economically weak. In terms of morality, moral strength is moral freedom. Morally
strong people would not allow a tyrant to thrive or last long. In the words of Jose Rizal is
the statement, “ there can be no tyrants where there can be no slaves.”
The Courage To Be
“Purity of heart is to will one thing,” says Kierkegaard. But to "will one thing” needs
courage. According to Paul Tillich (1952), “(c)ourage is self-affirmation 'in-spite-of,' that
is in spite of that which tends to prevent the self from affirming itself.” Courage is “the
affirmation of being inspite of non-being.” This implies affirming, accepting oneself
inspite of one's defects, lack, or imperfections, affirming the world we live in inspite all
that it lacks. In specific terms, courage is affirming, allowing the drug addict or drug
dependent to live inspite of his drug addiction. “Our greatest glory is not in never falling,
but in rising every time we fall.” Courage is not giving up because of setbacks and
failures. It is keeping right on keeping on. In politics, courage is affirming or accepting
one's people inspite of their ignorance, poverty. Political will means the courage to
promote the greatest good of the greatest number inspite of their selfishness, greed,
and unruly behavior. Commitment, engagement, fidelity, authentic existence are all
forms of "affirmation of being inspite of non-being." Courage is affirming the world
inspite of its tragedies. The last line in Desiderata says it so, "(w)ith all its sham,
drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world.”
APPLICATION
1. St Paul said: "I know the good to do but why is it that I do the opposite of the
good that I know?”
a. Do you experience the same? Does this mean unity of the intellect and will
or lack of unity?
b. For individual persons to be truly moral, how should their intellect and the
will function?
2. When is a person said to be weak-willed? Would you consider Governor Pontius
Pilate weak-willed? Why?
3. Interpret Robert Frost's immortal lines in the context of making moral decisions.
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
4. Relate Kierkegaard's “purity of heart is to will one thing," Paul Tillich's "courage is
self-affirmation ‘in-spite-of,' and Hornedo's stuff of free will as a multidimensional
matter to leading a moral life.
KEY POINTS
The moral person is endowed with an intellect and will.
Reason conducts the study, research, fact-finding, investigation, by using logic,
to arrive at a correct proposition.
The will is the faculty of the mind that is associated with decision making. It's the
one that says yes or no.
The "will" is what “disposes" what "the intellect proposes."
Strengthening of the will calls for courage which is self-affirmation in spite-of non-
being (Paul Tillich). Purity of heart is to will one thing. (S. Kierkegaard). The stuff
of free will is a multidimensional matter (Hornedo) - physical, economic, political,
etc. It is autonomous energy.
Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined above, it is now
time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. Create your poster on a
separate one whole short bond paper.
Make a poster distinguishing the difference between Reason and Will. Make
it creative!!
LOOKING AHEAD
Congratulations for making it till the end of this module! If you aced the assessments, I
am happy for you. If you have not reached your desired level of competence, just keep
going! Remember that an expert was once a beginner. The next topic will be
Accountability of Moral Act. Happy learning
REFERENCES
Ethics by: Ruben A. Copuz, AB English-Philo, Lib, PhD, Brenda B. Corpuz, BSE,
MAEd, PhD and Lorimar Publishing, INC 10-B Boston Street, Brgy. Kaunlaran,
Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Chapter IV
OVERVIEW
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Explain the meaning of ethical framework.
Distinguish among five ethical frameworks.
ACTIVITY
1. Match the items in Column 1 with Column 2. You may repeat an answer.
Column 1 Column 2
Ethical Statements Ethical Frameworks
_1. The ethical person develops good A. Virtue on Character Ethics of Aristotle
character
_4. That which is right follows the rule "do D. Utilitarian, Teleological and
good and avoid evil." Consequentialist
_5. That which is ethical is that which has E. Love and Justice Framework
good consequences.
ANALYSIS
The pretest is on various ethical frameworks. Based on the you just did, what is
meant by ethical framework?
ABSTRACTION
An ethical framework is a set of codes that an individual uses to guide his or her
behavior. It is just another term for "moral standards” as discussed in the early part of
this text. It is what people use to distinguish right from wrong in the way they interact
with the world. It is used to determine the moral object of an action. An ethical
framework guides an individual in answering these two questions: “What do I ought to
do?” and Why do I ought to do so”? So ethical frameworks serve as guideposts in moral
life.
The various dominant mental frames may be classified as follows: 1) virtue or
character ethics of Aristotle, 2) natural law or commandment ethics of St. Thomas and
others, 3) deontogical and duty framework of Immanuel Kant, 4) utilitarianist,
teleological and consequentialist approach and 5) Love and justice framework. They will
be introduced here but will be discussed more in detail in the succeeding lessons.
Virtue or Character Ethics of Aristotle
Virtue ethics asks, who is the ethical person? For Aristotle, the ethical person is
virtuous, one who has developed good character or has developed virtues. One attains
virtues when he/she actualizes his/her potentials or possibilities, the highest of which is
happiness. Happiness is the joy of self-realization, self-fulfillment, the experience of
having actualized one's potentials.
APPLICATION
3. For mastery, formulate a matching type of test like the one you did in the Activity
phase. Exchange test with your seatmate and answer the test separately then
correct answers together.
4. Compose a cinquain describing the ethical person based on any of the
ethical frameworks. (Note: A cinquain is A 5-line poem that consists of the following:)
Line one – one word
Line 2– 2 words that describe line one
Line 3 – 3 action words (-ing verbs_ that relate to line 1)
Line 4 – 4 words (feelings or a complete sentence) that relate to line
Line 5 - 1 word, synonym of line 1 or a word that sums it up
Person
Just, loving
Thinking, deliberating, choosing
I am grateful he is
Ethical
KEY POINTS
• An ethical framework is a set of moral standards that serves as a guide for all
persons to behave ethically and morally.
• Most common ethical frameworks are:
- Virtue or character ethics of Aristotle,
- Natural law or commandment ethics of St. Thomas and others,
- Deontogical and duty framework of Immanuel Kant,
- Utilitarianist, teleological and consequentialist approach, and
- Love and justice framework
Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined above, it is now
time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. Write your answers on a one
whole short bond paper.
LOOKING AHEAD
Congratulations for making it till the end of this module! If you aced the assessments, I
am happy for you. If you have not reached your desired level of competence, just keep
going! Remember that an expert was once a beginner. The next topic will be Aristotle’s
Virtue Ethics. Happy learning
REFERENCES
Ethics by: Ruben A. Copuz, AB English-Philo, Lib, PhD, Brenda B. Corpuz, BSE,
MAEd, PhD and Lorimar Publishing, INC 10-B Boston Street, Brgy. Kaunlaran,
Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
OVERVIEW
What is the moral or ethical thing to do according to Aristotle's virtue ethics? This is
the concern of this Lesson.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• Articulate what virtue ethics is
• Cite some criticisms or questions against virtue ethics
ACTIVITY
1. Give examples of virtuous persons you admire.
2. Why do you consider them virtuous persons? What virtues do they possess?
3. Share your answers with your group.
ANALYSIS
1. Based on your examples, who then is a virtuous person? 2. How did this virtuous
person become one? Was he born already virtuous or did he inherit his virtuous life?
ABSTRACTION
Virtue or character ethics
The following excerpts clarifies what virtue ethics is:
An ethical act is the action that a virtuous person would do in the same
circumstances. Virtue ethics is person-based rather than action-based. It looks at
the virtue or moral character of the person carrying out an action, rather than at
ethical duties and rules or the consequences of particular actions.
Virtue ethics does not only deal with the rightness or wrongness of individual
actions. It provides guidance as to the sort of characteristics and behaviors a
good person will seek to achieve. In that way, virtue ethics is concerned with the
whole of a person's life, rather than particular episodes or actions. A good person
is someone who lives virtuously – who possesses and lives the virtues.
Virtue ethics uses the following as a framework for ethical decision making. This
is how it is done:
In the Virtue framework, we try to identify the character traits (either positive or
negative) that might motivate us in a given situation. We are concerned with what kind
of person we should be and what our actions indicate about our character. We define
ethical behavior as whatever a virtuous person would do in the situation, and we seek
to develop similar virtues.
Obviously, this framework is useful in situations that ask what sort of person one
should be. As a way of making sense of the world, it allows for a wide range of
behaviors to be called ethical, as there might be many different types of good character
and many paths to developing it. Consequently, it takes into account all parts of human
experience and their role in ethical deliberation, as it believes that all of one's
experiences, emotions, and thoughts can influence the development of one's character
Stated similarly, virtue ethics is “the ethics of behavior” which “focuses on the
character of the persons involved in the decision or action. If the person in question has
good character, and genuine motivation and intentions, he or she is behaving ethically.”
The rightness or wrongness of one's action, or the goodness or badness of one's
personality depends on his character, motivations and intentions.
Virtue ethics, "is an ethics whose goal is to determine what is essential to being a
well-functioning or flourishing human person. Virtue ethics stresses an ideal for humans
or persons. As an ethics of ideals or excellences, it is an optimistic and positive type of
ethics."
Aristotle (384–323 BC) posited an ethical system that may be termed "self
realizationism.” In Aristotle's view, when a person acts in accordance with his
nature and realizes his full potential, he will do good and be content. At birth, a
baby is not a person, but a potential person. To become a “real” person, the
child's inherent potential must be realized. Unhappiness and frustration are
caused by the unrealized potential of a person, leading to failed goals and a poor
life. Aristotle said, “Nature does nothing in vain” Therefore, it is imperative for
people to act in accordance with their nature and develop their latent talents in
order to be content and complete. Happiness was held to be the ultimate things,
such as civic life or wealth, are merely Self-realization, the awareness of one's
nature and the of one's talents, is the surest path to happiness.
Buddhism also has its intellectual and moral virtues. From the eightfold path are
the intellectual virtues of right understanding and right mindfulness and the moral virtues
of right speech, right action and right livelihood.
Jesus Christ preached the virtues of love, mercy and compassion, hunger for
justice, patience, kindness, gentleness, self-control. St. Thomas Aquinas taught the
theological virtues - faith, hope and love. Christian tradition teaches four cardinal moral
virtues, namely: prudence, justice, temperance and fortitude.
St. Thomas being an eclectic philosopher, integrated into his own philosophy
anything that is good conceived by his predecessors like Aristotle. But he enriched their
thoughts with his own insights or learning. The attainment of the highest good, which is
happiness, includes its diffusion. “Bonum difusivum est." Goodness as goodness
necessarily diffuses itself. A person's virtue diffuses itself in a right action. Goodness
hares itself, like a light that shines before all men.
One more point regarding various potentials of man which when actualized
becomes virtues is Hans George Gadamer's re-interpretation of Aristotle definition of
man as a “homo logos,” a speaking animal. In other words, in the light Aristotle's
wisdom, the virtue of being man is being a speaking animal, meaning, his attainment of
a meaningful, refined, and civilized language. Gutter language is vice; beautiful,
meaningful and refined language is virtue. One who has a virtue of a refined language
speaks rightfully.
The virtuous person did not inherit his/her virtues. Neither were these virtues
simply passed on to him automatically. His being a person of virtue is a product of
deliberate, consistent, continuous choice and practice of living the virtue or virtues.
APPLICATION
1. The ethical person is a person of virtue/s. Describe this person of virtue based on:
a. Aristotle b. Confucius
d. Buddhist c. Hindu
e. Christian f. Gadamer
2. A morally virtuous person habitually determines the good and does the right actions.
How did Aristotle distinguish philosophic wisdom from practical wisdom? How do you
apply these thoughts in your self-project to become a virtuous person?
3. The virtuous person did not inherit his/her virtues. Neither die virtuous person just
pop up. Neither were these virtues simply passed on to him automatically. What
message does this tell you?
6. Gutter language is vice; beautiful, meaningful and refined language is virtue. One
who has a virtue of a refined language speaks rightfully. A young engineer once visited
a project site in a barangay. He was so shocked to hear everyone ending every
statement with bad words like putang ina, (literal translation bitch mother). How did
these people arrive at that habit of speaking bad language which to them is no longer
unusual or strange?
7. Knowing what is good is not synonymous to doing what is good. What does this
mean in the context of Aristotle's virtue ethics?
Virtue is a perfection of the will rather than of body or mind. Do you agree? Why or why
not?
KEY POINTS
• For virtue ethics framework, ethical behavior is what a virtuous person would do
in a situation.
• Aristotle gave two types of virtue – intellectual and moral.
• Intellectual virtues refer to excellence while moral virtues dispose a person to act
well.
• The highest good of a person is the fullness of his self-actualization.
• For Aristotle, virtue is the Golden Mean between two extremes.
• For Confucius two virtues jen (humaneness) and li (propriety) are most important.
• Hinduism emphasizes five basic moral virtues: non-violence, truthfulness,
honesty, chastity and freedom from greed.
• Buddhism has intellectual virtues – right understanding and right mindfulness.
The moral virtues are right speech, right action and right livelihood.
• Jesus Christ preached the values of love, mercy and compassion.
• Virtue diffuses itself in a right action.
Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined above, it is now
time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. Write your answers on a one
whole short bond paper.
LOOKING AHEAD
Congratulations for making it till the end of this module! If you aced the assessments, I
am happy for you. If you have not reached your desired level of competence, just keep
going! Remember that an expert was once a beginner. The next topic will be Aristotle’s
Virtue Ethics. Happy learning
REFERENCES
Ethics by: Ruben A. Copuz, AB English-Philo, Lib, PhD, Brenda B. Corpuz, BSE,
MAEd, PhD and Lorimar Publishing, INC 10-B Boston Street, Brgy. Kaunlaran,
Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.