Chaucer's Characterization in Prologue
Chaucer's Characterization in Prologue
The very quality or uniqueness which strikes our imagination is that the
Prologue proves to be a veritable picture gallery. In other words, it can
be said that The details of their physical appearance, their social status,
and character are so artistically presented before our eyes that the
whole man or woman comes alive before our eyes. It is also said rightly
by some critics that Chaucer's characters are both individuals and
types.).The Knight was a chivalrous character of all ages. “a verray
parfit, gentil knyght,” was a worthy fellow who loved truth, honor,
freedom, and courtesy. He was a great warrior who had been in fifteen
deadly battles for the sake of the Christian faith. the Knight has been
individualized by his horse, dress, and gentle behavior. The young
Squire stands for the type of warriors who were not always lost in the
dreams of warfare, but are also interested in singing and playing a flute.
But he has been individualized by his curly locks, embroidered clothes,
and his short coat.
The corruption of the church was exemplified by the Friar, Monk,
Pardoner, and Summoner. Chaucer satirizes that the church seems to
place on money and position. As we look at the characters of Reeve and
Miller, we come to know that both of these were individualized by their
dishonesty. However, none of these characters remains merely a
“type”. if we talk about the physical beauty of some of the characters in
which we see that Reeve has long and thin legs, and the Summoner has
a face full of pimples. All these characters are marked as individual
representatives of their own classes. All of these religious characters
are equal partners in sharing the corruption of the church.
The very first pilgrim woman is the Prioress, Madame Eglantine, and
she is the fourth character introduced by Chaucer in the General
Prologue, following the Knight, the Squire, and the Yeoman, in this
manner hinting at her nobility. “Ther was also a Nonne, a PRIORESSE,”
(I, 118) emphasizes the fact that she is not just a nun but a prioress,
thus pointing at her wealth and generous donation to the convent. Her
character is described as “desport”, “plesaunt”, “amiable”, “charitable”,
full of “conscience” and “tendre herte” to such extent that she would
easily weep if someone dares hurt an animal.
“A good WIF was ther of biside BATHE,” (I, 445). From the very first line
in her introduction, Alison is defined as a wife, and most importantly, a
“good wife”. In the lines from the General Prologue about Alison, two
facts attract attention the most: her five husbands and her habit of
going on pilgrimages. Alison afforded the luxury of going alone on
pilgrimages due to her properties. Yet the main reason Alison had five
husbands is simply that she enjoyed the company of men. Her greatest
talents are cloth-making and knowing the remedies of love. Varied
adjectives such as “deef”, “wrooth”, “fair” face, “worthy”, “gap-
toothed”, and “large” hips define her. All of these descriptions make
Alison appear more like a real woman. She is a wife and a woman who
does not fear men and society’s thinking, especially since she is clever
enough to justify her actions by quoting and counterattacking with valid
arguments. She is not flawless and most of the adjectives are used to
lead the reader to think of a typical woman of the Middle Ages.
Contrary to the other two pilgrim women, the Second Nun is only
mentioned but not described in the General Prologue. She does not
converse with other pilgrims and she only speaks when asked to tell her
story.
To sum up, we can say without any hesitation and fear of contradiction
that like Pope, Shakespeare and Milton, Chaucer is the master in the
portrayal of his characters and above all he is a realist and delineates
his characters as he sees them. We fully agree with the remarks of a
critic who observes: “Never before in English Literature had there been
anything like this company of real, unidealised, contemporary men and
women, and there was to be nothing comparable again until
Shakespeare began to write two hundred years later.”