NSW Surfing Physics Modules 7and8 Sample
NSW Surfing Physics Modules 7and8 Sample
Brian Shadwick
© Science Press 2018
First published 2018
All rights reserved. No part of this publication
Science Press may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
Bag 7023 Marrickville NSW 1475 Australia or transmitted in any form or by any means,
Tel: (02) 9516 1122 Fax: (02) 9550 1915 electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording
[email protected] or otherwise, without the prior permission of
www.sciencepress.com.au Science Press. ABN 98 000 073 861
Contents
Introductionvi
Words to Watch vi
7 Spectra Of Stars 16
v2
Analyse the experimental evidence gathered L = Lo 1 − .
C O NTENT about black body radiation, including Wien’s c2
FOCUS b
law: λmax = __ related to Planck’s contribution
T 31 Einstein’s First Thought Experiment 79
to a changed model of light. 32 Time Dilation – Einstein’s Second Thought 81
19 Max Planck – The Beginning Of Quantum 53 Experiment
Theory 33 tv Or Not tv? That Is the Question! 84
20 Wien’s Law 56 34 Length Contraction 87
35 Combined Relativity Questions 90
Investigate the evidence from photoelectric 36 Have Spaceship, Can’t Travel 92
C O NTENT
FOCUS effect investigations that demonstrated
inconsistency with the wave model for light. Analyse experimental validation for special
C O NTENT relativity for example observations of cosmic-
21 Albert Einstein and the Photoelectric Effect 57 FOCUS origin muons at the Earth’s surface, atomic
clocks (Hafele-Keating experiment) evidence
from particle accelerators and evidence from
Analyse the photoelectric effect: Ek = hf − Φ
C O NTENT as it occurs in metallic elements by applying
cosmological studies.
FOCUS the law of conservation of energy and the
37 Validation Of Special Relativity 94
photon model of light.
38 More About Muons and Special Relativity 96
22 Analysing the Photoelectric Effect 61
23 Analysing an Experiment 63 Describe the consequences and applications
C O NTENT of relativistic momentum with reference to
FOCUS mv
pv = ________ and the limitation on the
Light and Special Relativity v2
1 − 2
inquiry question c
How does the behaviour of light affect concepts of time, maximum velocity of a particle imposed by
special relativity.
space and matter?
39 Relativistic Mass 97
Analyse and evaluate the evidence 40 Relativistic Momentum 98
C O NTENT confirming or denying Einstein’s two
FOCUS postulates: the speed of light in a vacuum is Use Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence
an absolute constant and all inertial frames of C O NTENT relationship: E = mc2 to calculate the
reference are equivalent. FOCUS energy released by processes in which
mass is converted to energy. (Note that the
24 Relativity In the 1600s 64 production of energy in the Sun is covered in
25 The Aether Drag Theories 65 Module 8.)
26 Relativity 1870 To 1895 67
27 From 1895 To Einstein 69
28 Einstein and Beyond 72
29 Frames Of Reference and the Principle 75
Of Relativity
30 Einstein’s Postulates 78
Investigate the line emission spectra to Examine the model of half-life in radioactive
C O NTENT examine the Balmer series in hydrogen. C O NTENT
FOCUS FOCUS decay and make quantitative predictions
about the activity or amount of a radioactive
sample using the relationships: Nt = N0e−λt
ln (2)
64 The Bohr Atom 155 and λ = ______ where Nt = number of particles
t½
at time t, N0 = number of particles present at
Relate qualitatively and quantitatively the t = 0, λ = decay constant, t½ = time for half the
C O NTENT quantised energy levels of the hydrogen atom
FOCUS and the law of conservation of energy to the
radioactive amount to decay.
line emission spectrum of hydrogen using 76 The Half-Life Of Nuclides 181
hc 1
[
1 1
]
E = hf, E = ___ , and _ = R = __2 − __2 .
λ λ nf ni
77 Analysing a Half-Life Experiment 183
65 The Atomic Spectrum Of Hydrogen 158 Model and explain controlled and
C O NTENT uncontrolled chain reactions.
66 Analysing Spectral Data 162 FOCUS
Assess the limitations of the Bohr atomic 78 Fermi’s Model Of a Chain Reaction 184
C O NTENT model.
FOCUS 79 Controlled and Uncontrolled Chain Reactions 187
67 Limitations Of the Bohr Atom 163 Predict quantitatively the energy released in
C O NTENT nuclear decays or transmutations, including
FOCUS nuclear fission and nuclear fusion, by applying
Investigate de Broglie’s matter waves, and the law of conservation of energy, mass
C O NTENT the experimental evidence that developed defect, binding energy and Einstein’s mass-
FOCUS energy equivalence relationship: E = mc2.
h .
the formula λ = ___
mv
80 Binding Energy 188
68 Bohr and De Broglie 165 81 Nuclear Reactions, Mass Defect and 190
69 Applying De Broglie’s Ideas 167 Binding Energy
Analyse the contribution of Schrödinger to Model and explain the process of nuclear
C O NTENT the current model of the atom. C O NTENT
FOCUS FOCUS fission and nuclear fusion, including the
concepts of controlled and uncontrolled
chain reactions and account for the release
70 Schrödinger and Heisenberg 169 of energy in the process.
Words To Watch
account, account for State reasons for, report on, give explain Make something clear or easy to understand.
an account of, narrate a series of events or transactions. extract Choose relevant and/or appropriate details.
analyse Interpret data to reach conclusions. extrapolate Infer from what is known.
annotate Add brief notes to a diagram or graph. hypothesise Suggest an explanation for a group of facts
apply Put to use in a particular situation. or phenomena.
assess Make a judgement about the value of something. identify Recognise and name.
calculate Find a numerical answer. interpret Draw meaning from.
clarify Make clear or plain. investigate Plan, inquire into and draw conclusions
classify Arrange into classes, groups or categories. about.
comment Give a judgement based on a given statement justify Support an argument or conclusion.
or result of a calculation. label Add labels to a diagram.
compare Estimate, measure or note how things are list Give a sequence of names or other brief answers.
similar or different.
measure Find a value for a quantity.
construct Represent or develop in graphical form.
outline Give a brief account or summary.
contrast Show how things are different or opposite.
plan Use strategies to develop a series of steps or
create Originate or bring into existence.
processes.
deduce Reach a conclusion from given information.
predict Give an expected result.
define Give the precise meaning of a word, phrase or
propose Put forward a plan or suggestion for
physical quantity.
consideration or action.
demonstrate Show by example.
recall Present remembered ideas, facts or experiences.
derive Manipulate a mathematical relationship(s) to give
relate Tell or report about happenings, events or
a new equation or relationship.
circumstances.
describe Give a detailed account.
represent Use words, images or symbols to convey
design Produce a plan, simulation or model.
meaning.
determine Find the only possible answer.
select Choose in preference to another or others.
discuss Talk or write about a topic, taking into account
sequence Arrange in order.
different issues or ideas.
show Give the steps in a calculation or derivation.
distinguish Give differences between two or more
different items. sketch Make a quick, rough drawing of something.
draw Represent by means of pencil lines. solve Work out the answer to a problem.
estimate Find an approximate value for an unknown state Give a specific name, value or other brief answer.
quantity. suggest Put forward an idea for consideration.
evaluate Assess the implications and limitations. summarise Give a brief statement of the main points.
examine Inquire into. synthesise Combine various elements to make a whole.
Module 7 The Nature of Light Science Press
viii Module 8 From the Universe To the Atom Surfing NSW Physics Modules 7 and 8
NSW PHYSICS &
Module 7
78
The Nature Of Light
C O NTENT
FOCUS
In this module you will:
~~ Examine evidence for the
properties of light and evaluate
the implications of this evidence
for modern theories of physics.
~~ Study theories and models
developed by early physicists,
including Newton and Maxwell,
about mechanics, electricity
and magnetism and the nature
of matter.
~~ Explore how major discoveries in physics in the 20th century challenged existing theories
and models and led to the development of quantum theory and the theory of relativity.
~~ Understand how technologies arising from these new theories have shaped the modern world.
~~ Engage with all the Working Scientifically skills for practical investigations involving the
focus content to examine trends in data and to solve problems and communicate scientific
understanding about the nature of light.
QUESTIONS
1. When his theory on electromagnetism was proposed in 1864, it was not well accepted by many scientists who
claimed that it was ‘too different to warrant serious consideration’. What influenced these scientists to be opposed to
new ideas like Maxwell’s and many other brilliant minds of the mid 1800s?
2. List Maxwell’s contributions to the classical theory of electromagnetism.
Science is a truly international enterprise. It progresses because scientists are continually investigating to improve upon,
or add to, existing ideas. The investigations into the electromagnetic spectrum show how scientists from many countries
have contributed to our existing knowledge of rays that reach us from outer space. Until 1800 the only waves known
were those in the visible spectrum. Then followed some important discoveries.
• 1800 William Herschel, a British astronomer, discovered infra-red radiation (heat waves).
• 1801 German chemist Johann Ritter discovered UV radiation.
• 1867 James Clerk Maxwell, British mathematical physicist, predicted the existence of a continuous electromagnetic
spectrum of waves.
• 1887 German scientist Heinrich Hertz discovered radio waves. (They were thought to be of no use!)
• 1895 German physicist Wilhelm Roentgen discovered X-rays.
• 1896 French physicist Henri Becquerel discovered uranic rays – radioactive rays emitted by uranium.
• 1898 Marie Curie discovered radium.
• 1899 Ernest Rutherford identified alpha and beta radiation (particles not electromagnetic radiation).
• 1900 Frenchman Paul Villard discovered gamma rays.
• 1926 Scotsman John Logie Baird demonstrated TV for the first time.
Through these discoveries the major electromagnetic waves were identified. Electromagnetic transverse waves are
different from transverse matter waves in that they have the following properties.
• Electromagnetic waves can travel through a vacuum.
• They all travel at the speed of light (3 × 108 m s–1) in a vacuum – they slow down a little in other media.
• Electromagnetic waves are proposed to be self-propagating alternating electric and magnetic fields.
• Because the motion of the changing magnetic and electric fields are at right angles to the direction in which they
carry energy, electromagnetic waves are also classified as transverse waves.
• Because electromagnetic waves are really hard to draw, we usually draw them as transverse matter waves. The flaw
in doing this is that the energy carried by a transverse wave is indicated by the amplitude of the wave but this is not
the case with electromagnetic waves.
• In electromagnetic waves, the energy is directly proportional to the frequency of the photons which constitute the
radiation as given by Planck’s quantum theory equation, E = hf, which you shall learn about later.
• The wavelength of an electromagnetic wave is the distance
between the peaks of successive magnetic or electric field pulses. Electromagnetic wave
• We usually refer to the intensity of an electromagnetic wave
Magnetic field (B)
rather than to its amplitude. The intensity of an electromagnetic
wave depends on the number of photons in the beam. Each
photon will have energy dependent on its frequency. Electric field (E)
Frequency (Hz)
QUESTIONS
1. (a) The waves shown below all represent electromagnetic waves travelling for the same interval of time. List them
in order of increasing wavelength, amplitude, and then in order of increasing frequency.
(b) Measure the wavelength and amplitude of each wave.
A B C D
E F
Increasing wavelength
γ X UV Vis IR M R/TV
The accepted value for the speed of light (or any other electromagnetic radiation) today is 299 792 458 m s−1 in a vacuum.
Of course, when light (or any other electromagnetic waves) travel in denser mediums this speed is reduced – it is refracted.
This is so fast that scientists throughout the ages have had difficulties in determining the exact figure because their technology
was not accurate enough to get a decisive value. The first known people to consider how fast light travelled were the ancient
Greeks who considered, on the basis that stars appear as soon as you open your closed eyes, that the speed of light was infinite.
This was supported by most people including Roger Bacon in the 13th century, Dutch scientist Isaac Beeckman in 1629 and
even the famous Johannes Kepler in the 17th century. Some of the more notable attempts are summarised in the material below.
(Note that the values calculated by these scientists vary from resource to resource, so it is difficult to obtain reliable figures. The
values used here must, despite the degree of accuracy they sometimes state, therefore be taken as indicative rather than accurate.)
• 1638: Galileo: at least 10 times faster than sound
• 1675: Ole Roemer: 301 000 000 m s−1
• 1677: Christiaan Huygens: 201 168 000 m s−1
• 1728: James Bradley: 301 000 000 m s−1
• 1848: Hippolyte Louis Fizeau: 315 000 000 m s−1
• 1848: Marie Alfred Cornu: 300 400 000 m s−1
• 1862: Leon Foucault: 298 000 000 m s−1
• 1879: Albert Michelson: 299 310 000 m s−1
• 1926: Albert Michelson: 299 798 000 m s−1
• 1958: Keith Davy Froome: 299 7920500 m s−1
• 1972: US National Bureau of Standards: 299 792 458 m s−1
• 1983: 299 792 458 m s−1 (Conference of Weights And Measures. Internationally accepted value.)
1677 Christiaan Huygens
Christiaan Huygens used Roemer’s estimate and combined it with better
estimates of the distances between the Sun and the planets to derive a new
speed of light. He calculated the speed of light to be around 201 168 000 m s−1.
1728 James Bradley
English astronomer James Bradley measured the speed of light by how stars
appear to change in position as the angle of the Earth changes as it orbits the
Sun. This is known as stellar aberration.
The distance that the stars appear to move is proportional to the speed that the
Earth moves, divided by the speed of light.
Bradley used the current estimate of the distance between the Earth and the Sun
to determine the distance that the Earth must travel in that time and calculated
Ole Roemer (1644-1710).
the speed of lights as 301 000 000 m s−1, in error by only about 0.4%!
James Bradley determined that the stellar aberration is approximately the ratio of the speed the Earth orbits
the Sun to the speed of light.
Stellar aberration causes the apparent position of stars to change due to the motion of the Earth around the Sun.
Bradley used stellar aberration to calculate the speed
of light by knowing: Star
• The speed of the Earth around the Sun.
• The stellar aberration angle.
His independent confirmation, after 53 years of θ
v
struggle, finally absolutely ended the opposition
to a finite value for the speed of light. Earth
Sun
He calculated the speed of light in a vacuum as
c = 301 000 km s−1.
Mirror
Light source
1879 Albert Michelson
Michelson redesigned Foucault’s method to provide greater accuracy.
He increased the distance between the mirrors to 610 m instead of 18 m.
He also used much higher quality reflecting mirrors and obtained a value
for the speed of light of 299 310 000 m s−1, within 0.6% of today’s value.
In 1926 he repeated his experiment using improved technology and obtained
a value of 299 798 000 m s−1.
Jean Bernard Leon Foucault (1819-1868).
1950s onwards
The expansion of scientific knowledge in the 1900s, particularly the debate over the existence of
the aether, a medium invented to allow light to travel through space, the nature of electromagnetic
radiations and Einstein’s theory of special relativity led to the development of extremely accurate
measuring devices, notably Michelson’s interferometer for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize
in Physics in 1907. In 1958 Keith Froome obtained a value of 299 792.5 km s−1 using a microwave
interferometer and a Kerr cell shutter.
After 1970 the development of lasers with very high spectral stability and accurate caesium clocks
made even better measurements possible. Up until then, the changing definition of the metre had
always stayed ahead of the accuracy in measurements of the speed of light. But by 1970 the point
had been reached where the speed of light was known to within an error of plus or minus 1 m s−1. Keith Davy Froome
(1921-).
More recent measurements using laser beams, electronic circuits and interferometry have led to
an acceptance of the value for the speed of light as 299 792 458 m s−1.
QUESTIONS
1. What were the two factors which contributed to the inaccuracies in early measurements of the speed of light?
2. Human reaction time is at best about 0.2 s.
(a) How far would light travel in 0.2 s?
(b) How far apart would Galileo’s two lanterns have to be so that the human error contributed say, 50% error to his
calculated speed?
(c) What are the implications of your answer to (b) for experiments designed to measure the speed of light?
3. Research and summarise one of the more modern ways in which the speed of light has been determined.
Wavelength
Crest Crest
1
_
wavelength Melted
2 spot
Chocolate Trough
Method
• Take the turntable out of the microwave. The chocolate must be stationary when it is heated.
• Put a plate upside down over the rotor in the middle of the microwave base that turns the turntable.
• Place your bar of chocolate upside down (flat side upwards) so that its centre is as close as possible to the centre of the plate.
• Set the timer of the microwave for about 40 seconds. This is probably too long, but you will be turning it off manually.
• Turn the oven on and heat the chocolate until it starts to melt in two or three places. This should take about 20 seconds.
• Immediately you see the melted hot spots on the chocolate through the door, turn the microwave off.
• Take the plate and the chocolate out of the microwave – carefully! The chocolate will be hot. Measure the distance
between the centre of the melted spots as accurately as you can. This distance represents half the wavelength of the
microwaves. (Remember to change it to metres.)
QUESTIONS
1. Use the formula v = fλ to calculate your value for v, the speed of light.
2. Compare your answer to the accepted value (299 792 458 m s−1).
3. Calculate the percentage error in your experimental results from:
your experimental value 100
% Error = __________________________ × ____
real value = 299 792 458 1
4. Write up your experiment in the usual way and give it to your teacher to assess.
The nature of the spectrum of any source of radiation depends not only on the composition of the source, but as shown
by Planck’s work, the temperature of the source particularly if it is a solid. With elements and compounds, and even stars,
the individual composition and its surface temperature will be constant and therefore the spectrum they produce will be
the same every time it is produced. The spectrum is a ‘fingerprint’ for the object.
This applies also to individual light sources, but different low temperature light sources made by different manufacturers
will produce different spectra because they will not all be identical in composition. The spectra made by the same
manufacturer on different production runs might also show different spectra because there may be slight differences in
the composition of the materials used in their manufacture.
Light sources which have filaments that get very hot will all usually produce continuous spectra, but low temperature vapour
light sources such as mercury or sodium vapour lamps will produce light more consistent with their composition rather than
their temperature. So, sodium vapour lamps will tend to be yellow in colour and mercury vapour lamps purple.
Relative power
vapour lamp
The graphs below compare the typical spectra emitted by several types of lights, compared to sunlight.
Intensity
Intensity
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
0 0 0
400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700
Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm)
Halogen Cool white LED Warm white LED
100 100 100
80 80 80
Intensity
Intensity
Intensity
60 60 60
40 40 40
20 20 20
0 0 0
400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700
Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm) Wavelength (nm)
Relative energy
White LED scanning
manufactured in Australia. If you still have some of
them in your lighting fixtures at home, that is okay, but 100
when they ‘blow’, they will have to be replaced with
more energy efficient globes.
50 Mercury
vapour
lamp
0
400 500 600 700
Wavelength (nm)
Modern technology enables LED Spectra profiles of light emitting diodes for optical microscope
globes with a wide variety of colour 100
characteristics to be manufactured. 365 400 455 470 505 530 590 625
These have found use in many
decorative situations. 80
Relative energy
60
40
20
0
300 400 500 600 700
Wavelength (nm)
QUESTIONS
1. Consider the spectra of the cool white Cool white LED Warm white LED
100 100
LED and the warm light LED shown.
In terms of the given spectra, account for 80 80
Intensity
Intensity
Calcium Ca
Iron Fe
Sun
Sample A
Sample B
Sample C
Sample D
Ca
Na
Sr
Oxygen
emission
6. Consider the diagram showing the spectra of several elements and an unknown substance.
Which of the elements shown are contained in the unknown substance?
Bright line spectra
Lithium
Cadmium
Strontium
Mixture