Unesco - Eolss Sample Chapters: Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Unesco - Eolss Sample Chapters: Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Contents
S
TE S
2.1. Importance of Environmental Sampling
R
AP LS
2.2. Sampling Design and Strategy
2.3. Sampling Techniques
3. Sample Preparation for Environmental Analysis
C EO
3.1. Purposes of Environmental Sample Preparations
3.2 Types of Environmental Sample Preparation
4. Instrumental Analysis of Environmental Chemicals
4.1. Classical Methods vs. Instrumental Methods in Environmental Analysis
4.2. Molecular Spectroscopy in Environmental Analysis
E –
H
5.1. Immunoassay
5.2 Biosensors
6. Future Perspectives and Challenges of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
U
Glossary
Bibliography
Biographical Sketch
Summary
wastewater, ambient / emission air, and solid / hazardous wastes. The discussions of this
chapter start with the historical perspectives, unique features, and scopes of this
discipline. The importance of representative sampling, the approaches to select cost-
effective sampling design schemes, as well as classical grab / active sampling vs.
passive diffusion-based sampling techniques are delineated, followed by the discussions
of environmental sample preparation goals, various digestion procedures for inorganic
metals, and various extraction and partition based methods for volatile and semi-volatile
compounds. Traditional chemical instrumental methods and their corresponding
environmental applications are briefly described with respect to spectroscopic,
chromatographic, mass spectrometric, electrochemical, thermal, and radiological
methods. Complementary bioanalytical methods currently used in environmental
analysis such as immunoassays and those with promise in future development such as
biosensors are introduced. This chapter concludes with the remarks on the future
perspectives and challenges of environmental analytical chemistry. There is an urgent
need for advancing sampling methodology for practical applications, instrumental
S
TE S
innovations for faster, more sensitive and affordable bench instruments, and miniature
R
AP LS
sensing devices for real-time monitoring and remote applications.
since become the mainstream analytical tools for environmental analysis of heavy
metals and organic pollutants such as pesticides, PAHs, and PCBs. The recognition of
all of these contaminants, now referred to as legacy contaminants, took place since the
environmental movement started in 1950s.
S
TE S
1995, Analytical Chemistry of PCBs). Current textbooks in Environmental Chemistry
R
AP LS
contain contents of environmental analytical chemistry as a separate chapter, such as
Manahan (2000) and Girard (2010). Many of these environmental analytical chemistry
books were mostly written by people with traditional analytical chemistry expertise and
C EO
placed a focus on the “analytical” aspect, whereas “sampling” as a much bigger
contributor to the total error in environmental measurements was excluded or kept
minimal. Such has been changed when the quality of environmental data was pointed
from the laboratory measurement to the field sampling of air, water, soil, and solid
waste materials. Sampling guidelines have been published by various governmental
E –
agencies, and a textbook addressing both environmental sampling and analysis have
H
also been published (e.g., Zhang 2007, Fundamentals of Environmental Sampling and
PL O
Analysis). Many colleges and universities around the world are now offering an
environmental analytical chemistry course or an equivalent course as a proper training
M SC
needed for students in the environmental curricula. Increasing research attention has
been placed on the development of new sampling methodology and innovative
instrumentations for environmental measurements, as is evident in published papers
SA NE
Graduates with training and education in this field often find rewarding employment
opportunities in government agencies, industrial sectors, consulting firms, research and
commercial laboratories, and academic institutions.
Environmental analytical chemistry has the root of analytical chemistry, but as a well-
established and an independent discipline, it differs from the traditional analytical
chemistry in several aspects (Fifield and Haines, 2000; Zhang, 2007):
(a) Low concentration: Except for some conventional testing parameters, most
environmental pollutants are present at the trace level or ultra trace level rather
than in the units of percent (%), molarity (M), or normality (N) commonly seen
in the analytical chemistry field. The concentrations could be from as high as
parts per million (ppm), parts per billion (ppb), parts per trillion (ppt), to as low
as parts per quadrillion (ppq), or even lower. In laymen’s term, 1 ppt (10-12) is
equivalent to one drop of water diluted into 20 Olympic-size swimming pools
(50,000 m3), or about three seconds out of every hundred thousand years. In a
similar analogy, 1 ppq (10-15) is equivalent to 1 drop of water diluted into a
cube of water measuring approximately 368 meters on a side (fifty million
cubic meters, which is a cube about as tall as the Empire State Building's 102
stories), or two and a half minutes out of the age of the Earth (4.5 billion years)
(Wiki). Many of the emerging environmental contaminants are present at the
ppt levels, and measurements of contaminants at the ppq level have also
become feasible.
(b) Complex matrices: Environmental matrices are diverse, including air, surface
water (river, lake), drinking water, groundwater, soil, aerosol, sediment, sludge,
hazardous waste, biological specimen (blood, fat, hair, plant tissues) and many
S
TE S
other types, and are sometimes of unknown origins. Detecting trace levels of
R
AP LS
environmental pollutants from complex matrices requires complex and tedious
procedures to remove interference and background bulk chemicals, separate
chemicals of interest, and concentrate the aliquot to the detectable levels. Thus,
C EO
not only instrumental analysis is essential, but also the sample preparation is
critical for the expected accuracy and precision of the entire procedure. Many
times, this sample preparation adds the critical component of the uncertainty
and variability toward the overall environmental measurement.
E –
(c) High cost for both sampling and analysis: Often times, environmental projects
H
environmental pollutants. The costs for sampling and analysis for a large
number of samples will be high. In some cases, sampling cost is low relative to
M SC
analytical cost (e.g., the cost for a group of trace organic compounds in soils
can be in the range of $50 to $400 per sample). In other cases, analytical costs
might be low compared to sampling, for example, when samples are taken in a
SA NE
(d) Demand of in-situ monitoring and automation: In situ monitoring may become
U
S
TE S
radiological or other physical parameters of environmental interest (Figure 1).
R
AP LS
Environmental analytical chemistry can be further grouped into different subjects. As
illustrated in Figure 1, its subject contents can be classified according to (a) the types of
C EO
environmental parameters (inorganic, organic, biological/toxicological, radiological); (b)
its operational procedures from sampling, sampling preparation, sample analysis to data
analysis; and (c) the types of environmental matrices such as air (ambient atmosphere,
emission air), liquid (drinking water, wastewater), solids (soil, sediment, sludge, solid
waste and hazardous waste), and biological specimen (foods, plants, animals, and
E –
In the traditional analytical chemistry context that often focuses solely on “analysis”,
the analytical methods are divided into wet-chemical methods and instrumental methods.
M SC
The wet-chemical methods are gravimetric or volumetric types such as those methods
used for the measurement of suspended solids (SS), chemical oxygen demand (COD),
and biological oxygen demand (BOD).
SA NE
IR), atomic spectroscopic methods (AA, ICP), chromatographic methods (GC, HPLC,
and IC), mass spectrometric methods, electrochemical methods, thermal methods, and
radiological methods (Figure 1).
In the sections that follow (Section 2 through 5), the fundamentals of environmental
analytical chemistry are discussed in the logical order of their operations: environmental
sampling, sample preparation, analytical chemical methods based on instruments, and
biological based methods.
Certain important topics such as data analysis unique to environmental reporting and
quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) are excluded in the following discussions
due to limited space. Interested readers are referred to the books by Helsel (2005), Korte
(1999), and Keith (1991) for details.
S
TE S
R
AP LS
C EO
E –
H
statistics, and applied sciences in a wide range (social, political and natural sciences)
such as social surveys as well as sampling in metallurgy, pharmaceutical science,
material sciences and petroleum industries.
Even though some sampling theories were developed almost a century ago, sampling
work of most environmental projects is still performed in an empirical or semi-empirical
manner. As early as in 1954, Murphy indicated in an editorial note in Analytical
Chemistry that sampling is a subject analogous to weather in that many people talk
about it but do nothing to improve the situation. This statement is still true today for
environmental sampling. In most published environmental work, laboratory and
instrumental analyses are fully justified with regard to accuracy and precision, but
sampling design and representativeness are hardly mentioned. Ort et al. (2010) found
that only 11% of the 87 papers in the studies of pharmaceutical and personal care
The true fact of the matter is that sampling errors usually dominate the total errors of the
environmental data acquisition. Mar et al. (1986) indicated that analytical measurement
errors are typically 25% for physical/chemical parameters and 50% for biological
parameters. However, sampling errors due to natural variations can be in the range of
S
TE S
100% to 400%. With this assumption, Zhang and Zhang (2011) employed Monte Carlo
R
AP LS
simulation and obtained the following regression between the total error ( y ) vs.
sampling error ( x1 ):
C EO
y = 1.01x1 + 23.9 ( R 2 = 0.97 ) (1)
The R 2 value of 0.97 reveals that over 90% of the errors can be explained by the error
E –
during the sampling process. Whereas for the relationship between total error ( y ) and
H
The low R 2 value of 0.04 and the insignificant relationship between the total error and
analytical error implied that improvement in analytical measurement will not
SA NE
significantly improve the overall data quality if sampling error is large. These Monte
Carlo simulation results should make sense in practice because sampling is the first step
in the overall data acquisition process. If an unrepresentative sample is collected, or if a
U
-
-
-
Bibliography
Erickson, M. D. (1995), Analytical Chemistry of PCBs, second edition, Lewis Publishers, 667 pages.
[This is the most authoritative single source book for the analysis of PCBs, having both general and
detailed PCBs-related literature of about 2,000 bibliographic citations].
Fifield, F. W.; Haines, P. J. (2000), Environmental Analytical Chemistry, second edition, Blackwell
Science, London, UK, 512 pages. [A balanced textbook with principles of analytical chemistry and
contexts of environmental analysis].
Girard, J. E. (2010), Principles of Environmental Chemistry, second edition, Jones and Bartlett Publishers,
Sudbury, Massachusetts, 687 pages. [An easy to read environmental chemistry textbook that also includes
chapters for the analysis of pollutants in air, automobile emission, water and wastewater].
Greenwood, R.; Mills, G.; Vrana, B. (2007), Passive Sampling Techniques in Environmental Monitoring,
Elsevier, 486 pages. [Written by international specialist experts, this book offers a comprehensive review
of passive sampling for pollutants in air and water, their theories and applications].
Helsel, D. R. (2005), Nondetects and Data Analysis: Statistics for Censored Environmental Data, Wiley,
S
TE S
Hoboken, NJ, 250 pages. [This book presents statistical methods for interpreting and analyzing censored
environmental data involving concentrations below detection limits].
R
AP LS
Keith, L. H. (1991), Environmental Sampling and Analysis: A Practical Guide, Lewis Publishers, Boca
Raton, FL, 143 pages. [A concise book offering practical advice and tips on planning, sampling, analysis,
QA/QC, and reporting].
C EO
Korte, N. (1999), A Guide for the Technical Evaluation of Environmental Data, Technomic Publishing
Co., Inc., Lancaster, PA, 195 pages. [A book with an emphasis on the explanations of analytical data to
indicate the presence of environmental contaminants not expected from the site or point source under
investigation].
Loconto, P. R. (2001), Trace Environmental Quantitative Analysis: Principles, Techniques, and
E –
Applications, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. 646 pages. [A book with an insight into the principles of
H
trace environmental quantitative analysis, focusing on data reduction and interpretation, sample
PL O
pages. [A popular environmental chemistry textbook that also has chapters for the analysis of water,
wastewater, solid wastes, air and gas].
Mar, B. W.; Horner, R. R.; Richey, J. S.; Palmer, R. N.; Lettenmaier, D. P. (1986), Data acquisition: cost-
SA NE
effective methods for obtaining data on water quality, Environmental Science and Technology, 20:545-
551. [This paper presents methods to optimize environmental sampling design for cost-effective data
acquisition in water quality monitoring].
Marco, M.-P.; Barceló, D. (1996), Environmental applications of analytical biosensors, Measurement
U
Science and Technology, 7:1547-1562. [This article is a review of the fundamental aspects and
environmental applications of affinity based biosensors and catalytic biosensors].
Marco, M.-P.; Gee, S.; Hammock, B. D. (1995), Immunochemical techniques for environmental analysis
I. Immunosensors, Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 14(7):341-350. [This paper introduces the principles
and potential environmental applications of various immunosensors currently in the research and
developmental stage].
Murphy, W. J. (1954), editorial note, Analytical Chemistry, 26, 441. [This is a short editorial note
regarding the importance of sampling].
Murray, R. (2010), Challenges in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, 82(5):1569.
[This is a short editorial note pointing to the challenges in environmental analytical chemistry].
Organizing Committee for the Workshop on the Environment, Committee on Challenges for the
Chemical Sciences in the 21st Century, National Research Council (2003), The Environment: Challenges
for the Chemical Sciences in the 21st Century, 190 pages (http : / / www . nap . edu / catalog / 10803 .
html). [A report developed by a group of well-known scholars summarizing the important past
discoveries and future challenges in environmental chemical science].
Ort, C.; Lawrence, M. G.; Rieckermann, J.; Joss, A. (2010), Sampling for Pharmaceuticals and Personal
Care Products (PPCPs) and Illicit Drugs in Wastewater Systems: Are Your Conclusions Valid? A Critical
Review, Environmental Science and Technology, 44 (16):6024–6035. [Based on results from previous
and current work, the present paper demonstrates that sampling errors can lead to over-interpretation of
measured data and ultimately, wrong conclusions].
Richardson, S.D. (2002), Environmental mass spectrometry: Emerging contaminants and current issues,
Analytical Chemistry, 74:2719-2742. [This biennial review covers developments in environmental mass
spectrometry over the period of 2004-2005 with an emphasis on emerging contaminant analysis].
Rogers, K. R.; Mascini, M. (2009), Biosensors for Analytical Monitoring, http: / / www. e pa . gov /
heads / edrb / biochem / intro. html [This U.S. EPA website gives a perspectives of biosensors in
environmental analysis and monitoring with a description of biological elements and various transducers].
Sadik, Q.A., Wanekaya, A.K., Andreescu, S. (2004), Advances in analytical technologies for
environmental protection and public safety, Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 6, 513-522. [This
paper provides an overview of how advances in environmental analytical methodologies could be adapted
S
TE S
to design reliable sensors for public safety and environmental surveillance of chemical and biochemical
R
toxins].
AP LS
Skoog, D. A.; Holler, F. J.; Nieman, T. A. (1998), Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 5th Edition,
Saunders College Publishing, 960 pages. [This classical textbook for instrumental analysis has a detailed
account of the principles of various instruments currently used in analytical chemistry].
C EO
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1986), Testing Methods for the Evaluating Solid Wastes:
Physical/Chemical Methods, EPA SW 846 online: http : / / www . epa . gov / epaoswer / hazwaste. [This
online resource has a detailed update of Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, also known as SW-846].
E –
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002), Guidance on Choosing a Sampling Design for
H
Environmental Data Collection for Use in Developing a Quality assurance Project Plan, EPA/240/R-
PL O
02/005. [This U.S. EPA guideline provides assistance in developing an effective QA Project Plan
involving statistically based sampling schemes beneficial for program managers, analysts, and planning
M SC
teams].
Wikipedia, Analytical Chemistry, http : / / en . wikipedia . org / wiki / Analytical _ chemistry. [This
website has some information about the historical perspectives of analytical chemical, and the framework
of this discipline involving classical as well as instrument methods].
SA NE
Zhang, C. (1997), Fundamentals of Environmental Sampling and Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, 456
pages. [This unique textbook for environmental analytical chemistry or a related subject focuses on the
overall framework and various methodologies in environmental sampling and analysis].
U
Zhang, J.; Zhang, C. (2011), Sampling and sampling strategies for environmental analysis, International
Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, In Press. [This critical review addressed several key
issues in the development of an optimal sampling strategy in an effort to obtain representative samples
while minimizing sampling and analytical costs].
Biographical Sketch
Chunlong (Carl) Zhang is a Professor of Environmental Science and Chemistry at the University of
Houston-Clear Lake, and a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Louisiana. He received his
Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental Science and Master of Science degree in Environmental
Chemistry from Zhejiang University, and earned his Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from Louisiana
State University. He teaches several undergraduate and graduate level courses including environmental
chemistry, lab for environmental analysis, environmental sampling and monitoring, contaminant fate and
transport, and environmental remediation. His research interests are in the areas of emerging contaminant
analysis, contaminant fate and transport at the air-water-sediment interfaces, biodegradation of explosives
in contaminated soils, and development of novel remediation technologies. He is the author of a well-
received university textbook entitled Fundamentals of Environmental Sampling and Analysis published
by John Wiley & Sons in 2007.
S
TE S
R
AP LS
C EO
E –
H
PL O
M SC
SA NE
U