VSD Program Guide v2
VSD Program Guide v2
Science
Doctorate
Program Guide
2023/2024
Motivation
Discovery and Innovation
Motivation
Talent: Status Quo
Skills Retention
Admissions
Motivation
Talent: Venture Science Doctorate
Skills Retention
Venture-led Research
A worked example
Year 1: Familiarization
Clarissa Deshaun
Clean Energy Venture Scientist
Venture-led Research
A worked example
Venture-led Research
A worked example
Year 3: Incorporation
Research Program
Overview
Design
Principles
Inclusive
traditional and intelligent recruitment approach to
increase diversity and volume of pipeline from the
outset; DSV has built a behavioural and technical
capability assessment framework, implemented in
software, that performs high-specificity searches
and returns prioritised candidates
Venture-led
starting from market need and desired societal
outcome instead of academic IP, with a vision of
technology need in their sector(s)
Experiential
venture scientists 'learn by doing’, nurturing a
visionary entrepreneurial mindset and building
their own sector-defining companies
Learning Management
& Formative Assessment
The experiential learning of graduates will be facilitated through three relationships, two
virtual learning environments (VLEs) and an evaluation of the research candidates’ conduct.
The Outcomes Graph and Talent Graph will create learning record stores for research and
personal growth respectively. Continuous observation and support will lead to reliable
descriptions of learning patterns. Digital credentialing will convert different learning
experiences into founder, academic, industrial and consultant VSD awards.
Defining Venture
Scientists
Coding Learning
Outcomes by Trait Sense of Ambition
See pg.s 25-34 urgency
DU
Determination
DR
Based on the DSV founding
DA
analyst recruitment character-
istics, the MRes curriculum
Resilience
delivered in Year 1 contains 10
training modules delivering 68
learning outcomes designed to
equip graduates with the
knowledge, attitudes and skills of
elite venture creation talent.
Technical Commercial
ET
Expertise
EPS
EC
Problem
solving
Persuasion Concise
storytelling
MP
Magnetism
ME
MCS
Empathy
Pedagogy
Accelerating Expertise
Pedagogy
Accelerating Expertise
Applied Cognitive Task Analysis (ACTA) is 3. Simple memorization produces knowledge shields,
used to design training programs based on points of inflexibility adhered to across
the operations that distinguish experts environments. By contrast, simulations develop
mastery in context, teaching candidates how to
from novices.
improvise as founders. Simulations also distribute
learning over a number of sessions, one of the most
1. Interviews of expert practitioners and novices
robust ways to promote lateral thinking and
are used to identify key differences in task
long-term retention.
execution, even tacit knowledge differences
that experts may not be aware of or cannot
articulate.
With ACTA, we can accelerate learning rates (2.)
2. Differences in expertise are used to build adaptability and long-term retention (3.). We can
high-fidelity training simulations (from apply our proven venture creation system at the
multiple choice tests to virtual reality) that graduate-level, to close gaps between graduates
can be practiced repeatedly. Training and experts.
simulations accelerate learning by exposing
novices to the tasks they must master, 10s to
100s of times more frequently than normal
environments.
Pedagogy
Social Learning Media
Inputs:
Pitches
Task Logging Applied
Emotion levels knowledge Outcomes:
Multimedia
e.g. Trait
Social flow
Emotional Resilience
Mini-approvals
events
Integrated chat Cold calls
Tag counters
Digital
Credentialing
synthesis .
talent
graph
electives
TIER 1: FOUNDATIONAL
Business Modelling 3 75 7
Introduction to Scoping 3 75 7
Sector-Specific
TIER 2: ELECTIVE
Candidate’s options
Breadth
Candidate’s choices
TIER 3: PROJECT
Year 1
IVS NDS
Introduction to Narrative Design
Venture Science and Storytelling
Description Description
IVS NDS
Introduction to Narrative Design
Venture Science and Storytelling
✓ [ID0] knows which science founders ✓ [MCS1] comfortable in public speaking: non
they identify with by understanding technical audiences e.g. TED SKILL
their motivations, aspirations, ✓ [MCS2] speaks eloquently i.e. using
common challenges and working emphasis, pauses, pacing and captivates
styles KNOWLEDGE interest (including after it's been lost) SKILL
✓ [ID1] understands their motivations, ✓ [MCS4] is able to communicate complex
aspirations, challenges they may face technical topics in simple terms without loss
during science entrepreneurship and of accuracy SKILL
working styles they may employ ✓ [MCS3] picks out only the most relevant
KNOWLEDGE information when making a point/answering a
✓ [ID2] sees specific examples of question/ pitching a concept SKILL
getting people/deals over the line e.g. ✓ [DR7] masters steep learning curves in
from BD, Sales, Fundraising or/and relatively short timeframes despite the
Recruitment, including difficulty of the subject matter e.g. a new
strategies/techniques KNOWLEDGE technical field/new industry/job SKILL
✓ [ME2] can put aside their own ✓ [MP4] listens attentively: does not
viewpoint and see things from the interrupt/talk over when you talk or tries to
other person's perspective ATTITUDE finish your sentences, does not offer advice
✓ [ME3] shows genuine attentiveness too soon, retains eye contact, demonstrates
to others e.g. asks about personal their understanding of what you've said (e.g.
experiences/interests, offers useful by paraphrasing) SKILL
advice/resources (without being ✓ [MP5] asks a lot of questions to understand
asked), recaptures attention your position, drivers, views. Leads to ability
ATTITUDE to identify win-wins. SKILL
✓ [ME4] knows what common ✓ [MP3] conveys sincerity; talks from personal
early-stage team pitfalls are and how experience - doesn't shy away from talking
to avoid/deal with them SKILL about personal matters and what they're
✓ [ME1] has demonstrated saying match their facial expressions SKILL
individual/team-centric leadership ✓ [DA5] writes outcomes-oriented stories i.e.
through group scoping, coaching, addresses “what are we/ is society trying to
volunteering SKILL achieve?” and “how does that translate into
specific goals and outcomes? SKILL
HPC SBM
High Performance Culture Sector-specific
business modelling
Description Description
HPC SBM
High Performance Culture Sector-specific
business modelling
✓ [DA0] understands the process of ✓ [EC1] knows how industries are structured
exceeding expectations / setting big goals (how they evolve, key drivers, key
(for themselves) and achieving unlikely stakeholders) KNOWLEDGE
outcomes - as a function of exposure to ✓ [EC7] knows core principles of creating
the topic, deliberate practice, and and capturing value (making money) within
guidance KNOWLEDGE a given sector or sub-sector KNOWLEDGE
✓ [DA2] has [unreasonably] large goals ✓ [EC2] knows how to map relevant
(compared to what's typical for their landscapes e.g. patient/legislative/
area/field) and knows what outcome they regulatory/gov funding KNOWLEDGE
want to achieve ATTITUDE ✓ [EC0] Knows many (10) business models
✓ [DA1] achieves unlikely outcomes in the and can apply them to best use cases
pursuit of their goals e.g. generates KNOWLEDGE
high-risk approaches from scoping, ✓ [EC3] knows what large, sector-specific
completes research projects in a timely incumbent firms look for at the early-stage
and rigorous manner, made a discovery partnership level: how to approach, with
that could change the whole field what VP and different strategies for
ATTITUDE converting deals KNOWLEDGE
✓ [DR3] when under pressure - doesn't get ✓ [EC4] knows how to find the right
nervous or stressed - doesn't lose people/groups to target within key
composure, actually enjoys being organisations KNOWLEDGE
challenged ATTITUDE
✓ [DR4] routinely demonstrates positive
thinking and removes automatic negative
thoughts ATTITUDE
✓ [DR6] identifies gaps in their own
understanding, own strengths and
weaknesses, maintains honest
assessment of expertise ATTITUDE
✓ [DR5] catalogues 5 instances of
self-improvement and self-challenge that
requires getting out of one's comfort zone
e.g. developing a characteristic (like
confidence, persuasion, ambition) SKILL
IS S1
Introduction to Scoping Customer Development
Description Description
IS S1
Introduction to Scoping Customer Development
✓ [ET0] understands how to define the state ✓ [EC1] knows industry structure: how it has
of the art using literature review, and evolved, key drivers, key stakeholders
academic and industrialist interviews KNOWLEDGE
KNOWLEDGE ✓ [EC2] knows relevant landscapes e.g.
✓ [ET1] explains the state of the art in this patient/legislative/ regulatory/gov funding
space and can discuss the potential as KNOWLEDGE
well as limitations KNOWLEDGE ✓ [EC3] knows what OA/Sector-specific
✓ [ET2&3] identifies gaps in early-stage investors look for at
industrial/academic understanding, pre-seed/seed: how to construct the right
identifies specific technical/scientific milestones and how much to raise
thresholds and limits (i.e. constraints) (de-risking) KNOWLEDGE
KNOWLEDGE ✓ [EC6] knows how to find the right
✓ [ET0] hypothetically tests and resolves early-stage investors to target within the
technology development roadmap OA/Sector KNOWLEDGE
uncertainties KNOWLEDGE ✓ [DA5] conducts outcomes-oriented
✓ [ET4] maps technology development customer development scoping "what am I
roadmap that they can then execute trying to achieve?", “how does that
despite uncertainty KNOWLEDGE translate into specific goals and outcomes?
ATTITUDE
✓ [DA2] has [unreasonably] large goals
(compared to what's typical for their
area/field) and generated valid technical
next steps for the desired outcome
ATTITUDE
✓ [DA1] exceeds their own expectations and
achieves unlikely outcomes e.g. generates
high-risk approaches from scoping,
completes research projects in a timely and
rigorous manner, secured a high profile hire,
made a discovery that changed the whole
field ATTITUDE
S2 S3
Academic Research Feasibility and
and Expert Interview Technoeconomics
Description Description
S2 S3
Academic Research Feasibility and
and Expert Interview Technoeconomics
✓ [ET5] can discuss state of the art, across ✓ [EC0] conducts rigorous outcome-centric
three or more areas KNOWLEDGE technoeconomic analysis SKILL
✓ [ET6] draws from and compares principles ✓ [EC0] has conducted technoeconomic
across multiple fields SKILL analysis at the forefront of innovation in
✓ [DU3] has a clear rationale for their their field, with [outcomes-orientated]
chosen opportunity and how it fits with findings that challenge norms of publication
their broader goals and ambitions and practice KNOWLEDGE
ATTITUDE ✓ [DA0] understands how to accelerate
✓ [DA5] conducts outcomes-oriented technoeconomic analysis to exceed
academic research by focusing on the expectations and set more ambitious goals
questions "what am I trying to achieve?", - as a function of industry exposure
“how does that translate into specific KNOWLEDGE
goals and outcomes? ATTITUDE ✓ [DR1] demonstrates persistence despite
✓ [DA2] has [unreasonably] large goals setbacks, failure or difficulty to achieve
(compared to what's typical for their technoeconmoic analysis goals ATTITUDE
area/field) and generated valid technical ✓ [DR2] for a given technoeconomic
next steps for the desired outcome challenge, can identify an opportunity
ATTITUDE without being prompted to do so
✓ [DR2] for a given technical challenge(s) ATTITUDE
can identify an opportunity without being
prompted to do so ATTITUDE
✓ [ET0] designed experiments for technical
next steps (quantity vs. novelty) and
fielded academic feedback SKILL
✓ [DR1] demonstrates persistence despite
setbacks, failure or difficulty to achieve
goal/s ATTITUDE
CDM R:T
Complex Decision Making Research: Tests
Description Description
CDM R:T
Complex Decision Making Research: Tests
MRes
Assessment: 1
Sector Architecture
This 30 pg. document will describe and discuss the venture
scientist’s contribution to industrial landscaping and academic
research in the sector they seek to advance.
MRes
Assessment: 2
Optimising
Research Productivity
Conventional VSD
Individual research projects must often be 10 or more research projects will be designed,
devised with less than 2 months of full filtered for feasibility and subjected to
time input during grant writing, or selected preliminary lab work, over 12 months, with
as interesting off-shoots of established supervision.
research projects.
Project management and experimental design
Research projects are pursued in series training received in year 1, further expedites
and in a process of random walks as one progress against research aims. Simulation
project fails and a new avenue is explored. and automation are implemented wherever
Experimental design develops through trial possible and research strategies are designed
and error, sometimes with input from the with contingencies and fall-back plans in case
research team. of failure.
Incorporating
Doctoral
Synthesis
b. Investment Memo
6 pg.s
Presenting pertinent and sufficient information
for investors to value the business.
2023
Case Study
Helena Rodriguez
Builds founding
team and raises Deeptech supervisor pushes to test
seed investment medical device with patients
[email protected]
www.deepscienceventures.com