6 Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis PSHA
6 Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis PSHA
• Probabilities are useful in characterizing seismic hazard since earthquakes and their effects are random
phenomena.
• Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis(PSHA) takes into account the seismic potential of the seismic
sources, the random nature of earthquake occurrences, the random nature of the ground motion
produced by these earthquakes, the damage potential of these ground motions, and the uncertainties
involved at all levels of the process.
• Prior to the widespread use of PSHA for assessing earthquake hazards, Deterministic methods (DSHA)
dominated such assessments.
• The analytical approach of PSHA was first developed by C.A. Cornell in 1968.
• It was used by S.T. Algermissen et.al. (USGS) for developing a probabilistic seismic hazard
map of US in 1976.
• The map was later on used as a basis for developing the US seismic zone map in the Uniform
Building Code (US) in 1988.
• The analysis procedure is currently widely accepted and used all over the world.
http://seismo.ethz.ch/gshap /
Performance-based Seismic Design of Buildings – Semester: Spring 2020 (Fawad A. Najam) 9
Key Assumptions in Calculating Probabilistic Ground Motions
1) Earthquakes occur within the defined seismic source zones or along the defined active faults.
2) Within each defined seismic source zone (or active fault), earthquakes occur randomly at any
location with an equal chance (probability).
3) Within each defined seismic source zone (or active fault), earthquakes randomly occur in time,
in which the average rate of occurrence is defined by its magnitude-recurrence relation. This
random occurrence in time is modeled as a Possion process.
5) In any earthquake event, the ground motion parameter (e.g. PGA, SA) at the site of interest can
be estimated from the earthquake magnitude, source-to-site distance, and other earthquake
parameters by using the selected attenuation relationship.
Source B
Source C
Site
Probability of Exceedance
Source A
Selection of site(s)
Identification of all critical tectonic features (e.g. active faults, seismic source zones) likely to
generate significant earthquakes—seismic sources
Selection of appropriate
ground-motion prediction
equations (GMPEs)
Determining of
Probabilities of
Exceedance (Hazard
Curve)
Step 3: Step 4:
Attenuation/GMPEs Hazard Curves
Step 1: Identification of all Seismic Sources
Step 1: Sources
Identification of Seismic Sources
• Where active faults have been identified and mapped, they become the sources of future
earthquakes.
• Where specific faults have not been identified or their characteristics are not well understood, it is
common to define ‘seismic source zone’.
• Within the seismic source zone, earthquakes are typically modeled either as a single point of
energy release (a point source) or as a rupture on a fault (a finite-size source) with a random
location or orientation.
• In such cases, the challenge of the analyst is to identify source zones in which the seismicity is
relatively uniform.
• Even in areas where faults are well defined, a source zone may be needed to model the random
occurrence of small and moderate earthquakes (M < 6.5)—background seismicity.
Earthquakes in Thailand-
Burma-Indochina Region
(1910-2000)
Historical Seismicity
of Pakistan (M5+)
Historical Seismicity
of Pakistan (M6+)
Step 1: Sources
Historical Seismicity of
Pakistan (<30Km Deep)
Step 1: Sources
Historical Seismicity of
Pakistan (>150Km Deep)
Potential seismic sources in Continental Asia, more than twenty
seismic sources in Pakistan (boundary shown in red color)
(modified from GSHAP).
• Typically mo = 4.0
• In traditional applications of PSHA, 𝝂 is simply estimated from the historical rate of occurrence of
earthquakes exceeding mo
www.structurespro.info/pegmd/
Instrumental earthquake data of Myanmar, Thailand and Indonesia Step 2: Recurrence
Step 2: Recurrence
• The most commonly used equation (model) to describe the occurrence of earthquakes is the
well-known Gutenberg-Richter relationship:
N(m) is the average number per year of earthquakes having magnitudes greater than m.
a and b are constants; they are conventionally obtained from an appropriate statistical analysis of
historical earthquakes.
10a is the average number per year of earthquakes above magnitude zero.
b describes the relative rate of occurrence of different magnitudes. b is typically 1.0 + 0.3.
• The form of this relationship has been verified from observations of seismicity
throughout the world.
The Gutenberg-Richter
(exponential) model
Log10 N(m) = a - b.m
m
Recurrence Models and Seismicity Parameters
The Seismicity Parameters (Recurrence Rates) are calculated by Gutenberg-Richter Law (1974)
𝐿𝑜𝑔 𝜆𝑀 = 𝑎 − 𝑏 ∗ 𝑀
Magnitude-Recurrence Relationships
Twelve Regional Seismic Source Zones and 10
0.01
0.001
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 M
Performance-based Seismic Design of Buildings – Semester: Spring 2020 (Fawad A. Najam) 44
Step 2: Recurrence
Fault Sources
• The ground motion attenuation relationships provide the means of estimating a strong-
ground-motion parameter of interest from parameters of the earthquake, such as magnitude,
source-to-site distance, fault mechanism, local site conditions, etc.
• The choice of an appropriate relationship is governed by the regional tectonic setting of site of
interest, whether it is located within a stable continental region, or an active tectonic region,
or whether the site is in proximity to a subduction zone tectonic environment.
Ground Shaking
Intensity
miles
Subduction Regions
Source: https://www.naturalfractures.com/
Coefficients c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, and c6 are normally determined by fitting the equation to
actual ground motion data (applying statistical regression analyses).
The term c3.Log10 R represents the geometric attenuation of the seismic wave front as
it propagates away from the earthquake source.
The term c4.R represents the anelastic attenuation that results from the material
damping and scattering as the seismic waves propagate through the crust.
10
0.01
1
M w = 8.0
0.001
0.1
0.0001
WNA models
0.01
EU models
CENA models
0.001
0.0001
1 10 100 1000
Rupture Distance (km)
Performance-based Seismic Design of Buildings – Semester: Spring 2020 (Fawad A. Najam) 62
Step 4: The Development of Hazard Curves for the Sites
Identification of all
potential seismic sources
Selection of appropriate
ground-motion prediction
equations (GMPEs)
Determining of
Probabilities of
Exceedance (Hazard
Curve)
Step 3: Step 4:
Attenuation/GMPEs Hazard Curves
Recurrence
Attenuation/GMPEs
𝑀′
Magnitude (M)
𝑀′