Scribd
Upload
74 views3 pages

WWF Ifas Sfas Table

The document contains an internal factors analysis (IFAS) table and external factors (EFAS) table for the World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF) in 2015. The IFAS table rates and weights WWF's strengths, such as its culture and global partnerships, and weaknesses, like manufacturing facilities. It gives WWF an overall internal score of 3.96. The EFAS table similarly rates and weights strategic factors such as financial position, global positioning, opportunities like increasing green economy, and threats such as declining wildlife populations. It provides an overall external score of 3.92.

Uploaded by

Jhun Albert Ambatali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
74 views3 pages

WWF Ifas Sfas Table

The document contains an internal factors analysis (IFAS) table and external factors (EFAS) table for the World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF) in 2015. The IFAS table rates and weights WWF's strengths, such as its culture and global partnerships, and weaknesses, like manufacturing facilities. It gives WWF an overall internal score of 3.96. The EFAS table similarly rates and weights strategic factors such as financial position, global positioning, opportunities like increasing green economy, and threats such as declining wildlife populations. It provides an overall external score of 3.92.

Uploaded by

Jhun Albert Ambatali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

EXHIBIT 2 IFAS Table for World Wildlife Fund for Nature, 2015

Weighted
Internal Factors Weight Rating Score Comments

Strengths
 Quality WWF’S nurtured
culture 0.15 5.0 0.75
 Global Partnership 0.20 4.0 0.8
 Financial Position 0.10 4.5 0.45
 Advertisements 0.05 3.0 0.15
 Global Goal on
Adaptation 0.10 3.6 0.36
Weaknesses
 Process-oriented R&D 0.02 3.0 0.06
 Global positioning 0.08 3.5 0.24
 Manufacturing facilities 0.10 2.0 0.2
 Company culture
differentiation 0.15 5.0 0.75
 Limited human
resources 0.05 4.0 0.2
1.00 3.96

EXHIBIT 3 SFAS Table for World Wildlife Fund for Nature, 2015
I
N
T
E
R
M
E
S D
H I L
O A O
Weighted R T N
Strategic Factors Weight Rating Score T E G Comments
 Quality WWF’s
nurtured culture Quality key to
(S) 0.16 3.3 x success
0.53
 Financial
position (S) 0.04 4.5 x x Average to high debt
0.18
 Company culture
differentiation
(W) 0.14 3.1 x x WWF quality
0.43
 Global
positioning (W) 0.23 4.6 x x Over 100 countries
1.06
 Global
awareness of
wildlife welfare
(O) 0.11 5.0 x Will take time
0.55
 Green economy May take lot of time
development (O) 0.18 3.5 x x and effort
0.63
 Deterioration of
wildlife Possibility of specie
population (T) 0.09 4.3 x extiction
0.39
 Contributors
concentrated
into a specific WWF weak in other
region (T) 0.05 3.0 x x regions
0.15
1.00 3.92

You might also like