02methods Practice
02methods Practice
Andreas Kostol
([email protected])
Spring 2021
1/34
Summary
Data contamination:
Observational data and OLS provides results that are (biased
and) hard to interpret
Potential solutions:
We can run real experiments when feasible or look for natural
experiments in the data
2/34
Causation 6= Correlation
3/34
Causation 6= Correlation
3/34
Causation 6= Correlation
3/34
Causation 6= Correlation
3/34
MULTIPLE CHOICE
4/34
Question
5/34
Question
5/34
Question
6/34
Question
6/34
Question
7/34
Question
Answer: I, II and IV
7/34
Question
8/34
Question
8/34
Question
Consider a sample of AZ workers and their hourly wages
{ 10; 10; 12; 13; 15; 15; 25; 29; 30; 31} at time period 1, and
{10; 10; 10; 12; 15; 16; 18; 32; 35; 37} at time period 2.
a. Calculate the mean and 50th percentile in period 1
b. Calculate the mean and 50th percentile in period 2
c. Calculate the variance in both periods.
d. Did inequality in wages increase? Why?
9/34
Question
Consider a sample of AZ workers and their hourly wages
{ 10; 10; 12; 13; 15; 15; 25; 29; 30; 31} at time period 1, and
{10; 10; 10; 12; 15; 16; 18; 32; 35; 37} at time period 2.
a. Calculate the mean and 50th percentile in period 1
b. Calculate the mean and 50th percentile in period 2
c. Calculate the variance in both periods.
d. Did inequality in wages increase? Why?
Yes, wage inequality went up. The variance clearly went up, so
did the dispersion in terms of 90th to 10th percentile
differences. 9/34
Question
10/34
Question
10/34
Question
11/34
Question
Answer: 2000
11/34
Question
12/34
Question
Answer: 2
12/34
Question
13/34
Question
13/34
Question
14/34
Question
Answer: 1.
14/34
Question
15/34
Question
15/34
Question
16/34
Question
Answer: True
16/34
Question
17/34
Question
17/34
Question
17/34
Question: OLS, IV, DiD, or RDD
18/34
Question: OLS, IV, DiD, or RDD
18/34
Question: OLS, IV, DiD, or RDD
18/34
Question: OLS, IV, DiD, or RDD
19/34
Question: OLS, IV, DiD, or RDD
Answer: IV
19/34
Question: OLS, IV, DiD, or RDD
Answer: IV
Quasi-randomization: Potential outcomes are independent of
reform. Reform affects years of schooling, but not wages other
than via schooling.
19/34
Question: OLS, IV, DiD, or RDD
20/34
Question: OLS, IV, DiD, or RDD
Answer: RDD.
20/34
Question: OLS, IV, DiD, or RDD
Answer: RDD.
There exists an assignment variable, cutoff is “random”, and
the cutoff determines treatment
20/34
Question
21/34
Question
21/34
Question
22/34
Question
22/34
PROBLEM 1
23/34
Problem 1
a) (10 points) Do you think that the coefficients in the regression are likely to suffer
from selection bias? Explain.
24/34
Problem 1
a) (10 points) Do you think that the coefficients in the regression are likely to suffer
from selection bias? Explain.
A: Nope. This sounds good. It satisfies the randomization assumption required to
estimate ordinary least squares models.
24/34
Problem 1
a) (10 points) Do you think that the coefficients in the regression are likely to suffer
from selection bias? Explain.
A: Nope. This sounds good. It satisfies the randomization assumption required to
estimate ordinary least squares models.
b) (10 points) Does the labor supply curve ever bend backwards (i.e., start falling for
higher wages)?
24/34
Problem 1
a) (10 points) Do you think that the coefficients in the regression are likely to suffer
from selection bias? Explain.
A: Nope. This sounds good. It satisfies the randomization assumption required to
estimate ordinary least squares models.
b) (10 points) Does the labor supply curve ever bend backwards (i.e., start falling for
higher wages)?
A: Differentiate with respect to wage, set equal to zero: 0.5 = 2 × .05W . Hence,
labor supply starts falling when wage is above $5.
24/34
Problem 1
c) (10 points) The backward bending part of this model is given by parameter
estimate on c. When thinking about inference on this parameter, how would you
describe the null hypothesis?
25/34
Problem 1
c) (10 points) The backward bending part of this model is given by parameter
estimate on c. When thinking about inference on this parameter, how would you
describe the null hypothesis?
A: We want to test whether c=0. The alternative hypothesis is that it is not equal
to 0.
25/34
Problem 1
c) (10 points) The backward bending part of this model is given by parameter
estimate on c. When thinking about inference on this parameter, how would you
describe the null hypothesis?
A: We want to test whether c=0. The alternative hypothesis is that it is not equal
to 0.
d) (10 points) Does the inference on the parameter estimates of c alter your
conclusion from question (b)?
25/34
Problem 1
c) (10 points) The backward bending part of this model is given by parameter
estimate on c. When thinking about inference on this parameter, how would you
describe the null hypothesis?
A: We want to test whether c=0. The alternative hypothesis is that it is not equal
to 0.
d) (10 points) Does the inference on the parameter estimates of c alter your
conclusion from question (b)?
A: Yes. Look at the ratio of the estimate -0.05 over standard error. We observe
that the (absolute value of the) ratio is much smaller than the critical value of 2.
Hence, we definitely do not reject the null, so we do not believe that the labor
supply is backward bending anymore. Or put more precisely, it could be, but we do
not have the evidence yet to support the idea.
25/34
Problem 1
c) (10 points) The backward bending part of this model is given by parameter
estimate on c. When thinking about inference on this parameter, how would you
describe the null hypothesis?
A: We want to test whether c=0. The alternative hypothesis is that it is not equal
to 0.
d) (10 points) Does the inference on the parameter estimates of c alter your
conclusion from question (b)?
A: Yes. Look at the ratio of the estimate -0.05 over standard error. We observe
that the (absolute value of the) ratio is much smaller than the critical value of 2.
Hence, we definitely do not reject the null, so we do not believe that the labor
supply is backward bending anymore. Or put more precisely, it could be, but we do
not have the evidence yet to support the idea.
e) (10 points) Do you think that the coefficients in the regression are likely to suffer
from selection bias? [YES or NO]
25/34
Problem 1
c) (10 points) The backward bending part of this model is given by parameter
estimate on c. When thinking about inference on this parameter, how would you
describe the null hypothesis?
A: We want to test whether c=0. The alternative hypothesis is that it is not equal
to 0.
d) (10 points) Does the inference on the parameter estimates of c alter your
conclusion from question (b)?
A: Yes. Look at the ratio of the estimate -0.05 over standard error. We observe
that the (absolute value of the) ratio is much smaller than the critical value of 2.
Hence, we definitely do not reject the null, so we do not believe that the labor
supply is backward bending anymore. Or put more precisely, it could be, but we do
not have the evidence yet to support the idea.
e) (10 points) Do you think that the coefficients in the regression are likely to suffer
from selection bias? [YES or NO]
A: Yes, the wage is correlated with preferences for leisure. So when wages are high,
drivers do no want to drive. So there is a unobserved determinant of hours that is
correlated with positive changes in the wage. This means that there should be a
negative bias in the estimates, where taxi drivers’ preferences for soccer look like a
backward bending labor supply curve.
25/34
PROBLEM 2
26/34
Problem 2
27/34
Problem 2
27/34
Problem 2
27/34
Problem 2
27/34
Problem 2
27/34
Problem 2
27/34
PROBLEM 3
28/34
Problem 3
29/34
Problem 3
29/34
Problem 3
Describe the average treatment effect and how that may differ
from the treatment effect among the treated.
30/34
Problem 3
Describe the average treatment effect and how that may differ
from the treatment effect among the treated.
30/34
Extra Questions
31/34
R-Squared
32/34
R-Squared
32/34
R-Squared
33/34
R-Squared
34/34