APPENDICES

Accomplished Gap Analysis Template

GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE

1. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE in ACCESS
B.2 CURRENTLY CONTRIBUTING B.5 GROUPS
B.1 NEEDED B.3 Inhibiting B.4 Projects
A. DIVISION TARGETS Explanation THAT REQUIRE
DATA Factors Implemented
Yes/No ATTENTION
1. Increased Net Enrolment Rate Enrollment The outbreak of COVID-19 - Implemented Parents, BHW
Elementary from 93.80% to 95.53% (BoSY) worldwide caused the decreased project “Sulod na
Yes of enrolment because those who Kita”
M F T where isolated in other places
145 112 257 chose not to return to San Rafael.

2. Decreased number of out of school Data on Child Health problems of these 4 Support of parents Implemented the Parents who do not
children/youth. mapping children and negative attitude of and health “Busog, Lusog, give priority to
*Number of Yes parents about schooling due to problems Talino“ Project education
Children in the effect of pandemic.
Brgy. Not in School
for SY: 2022-
2023=4

3. Increased Net enrolment for Kindergarten Enrolment for this year decreased Health problems Implemented the Poorest households and
Kindergarten from 78.87% to 85.91% Enrollment Yes by 3. project “Sulod na those far from the
(for Elem. Only) BoSY: Kita” school.
M F T
19 12 31
4. Improved Retention Rate Retention Rate Yes All the learners from Grade 1-5 Support from Project “Alleviate
Elementary from 99.15% to 100% last year continued their parents and Learners’ Daily
99.29% education in San Rafael ES. stakeholders. Attendance”

5. Decreased Drop- out Rate Drop Out Rate No Drop out for the last 3 years is - Project “Zero
for: Elementary from 0.28% 0% Dropout Sustained”
to 0.17% 0%

6. Increased Transition Rate Transition Rate Yes All kinder learners from last year Transfer of Project “Alleviate Parents who do not
Kinder (K-Grade1) from 98.15% to transitioned to grade 1 (2 were residence Learners’ Daily want their young
98.29% Level 2021- enrolled in another school) while Attendance” children to be
Grade 6 to Grade 7 from 93.16% to 2022 in Grade 3-4, transition is 100%. vaccinated.
93.45% K-G1 99%
Grade 10 t0 11 from 92.24% to 92.67% G3-G4 100%

7. Increased Participation Rate of Out of Participation Rate Yes For the last 4 years still there are Effect of the “Adopt A Child” Learners need to
School Children or number of sch. Age children not in school. modular learning Program augment family needs.
Out of School youth OSY/OSC in the that parents serve
catchment area for as LSA.
the last 4 years.
No .of OSY/OSC
SY: 2019-2020=3
SY:2020-2021=2
SY:2021-2022=3
SY:2022-2023=3
8. Increased completed Sessions on ALS
for
Out of School Children
Out of School Youth

2. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE in EQUITY

B.2 CURRENTLY CONTRIBUTING B.5 GROUPS
B.3 Inhibiting B.4 Projects
A. DIVISION TARGETS B.1 NEEDED DATA YES/ EXPLANATION THAT REQUIRE
Factors Implemented
NO ATTENTION
Increased retention rate (for ELEMENTARY - - - - -
learners in situation of Retention Rate
disadvantage) No data

Increase percentage of learners

(in disadvantaged situation)
with at least proficient level or
better in terms of
A. Functional literacy
Functional Literacy
% of learners at with at least
proficient level or better -
-No Data

B. Numeracy
 Numeracy
% of learners at with at least
proficient level or better
C. 21st Century Skills No data

21st century skills

% of learners with at least
proficient level or better
No data

3. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE in QUALITY

B.2 CURRENTLY B.5 GROUPS
B.3 Inhibiting B.4 Projects
A. DIVISION TARGETS B.1 NEEDED DATA CONTRIBUTING THAT REQUIRE
Factors Implemented
YES/NO EXPLANATION ATTENTION
 Percentage of learners who Yes Last year the Health Implemented Learners with
completed Elementary completion problem. “Busog, Lusog, health problems
Improved Completion Rate 2019-2020 =95.15% rate Talino” Project
2020-2021=95% decreased.
2021-2022=95%
Percentage of learners attaining nearly Yes From the The sudden Project Learners that
proficient level or better in result of the exposure of CRISTINA belong to Full
Pre-Test their learners in refresher in the
(Stage 1 – Kinder to G3) was an the face-to- CRLA
 CRLA 2022-2023 improvement face classes Learners that
G Langu Full Mod Ligh Gra
age Refr erate t Ready during the and having belong to
eshe conduct of their parents frustration level
r the 1st as LSA during in Phil IRI
Improved number of learners 1 Waray 91% 0% 9% 0% quarter. the 2 yrs. Learners that
attaining nearly proficient 2 Waray 13% 42% 10% 35%
Modular belong to Non-
level or better in Reading Fil 10% 48% 3% 39%
and Listening 3 Waray 36% 0% 14% 50% learning numerates.
Comprehension Fil 33% 10% 10% 50%
Eng. 17% 21% 45% 17%

(Stage 2 – G4 to G6)
 Literacy
G Reading Level
ra English Filipino
d Fr Ins In Fr Ins In
 e
4 93% 3% 0% 63% 37 0%
%
5 94% 6% 0% 63% 37 0%
%
6 76% 24% 0% 100 0% 0%
%

*Numeracy
Fisrt Quarter SY: 2022-2023
Gra Tested H- Mod Non-Numerate
de numer Numerat
ate e
1 25% 34% 41% 25%
2 47% 28% 25% 47%
3 48% 33% 19% 48%
4 61% 29% 16% 61%
5 39% 43% 18% 39%
6 2% 59% 38% 2%

Percentage of learners attaining Yes There was an Provision of Project Learners who
proficient level or better in Stage 2 improvement reading CRISTINA belong to
literacy standards of the result materials to frustration level
Improved number of learners  Grade 4 : 3% from the the learners
attaining proficient level or  Grade 5 : 6% conduct of
better in Stage 2 literacy  Grade 6 : 24%
standards Pre-test and
the result of
the 1st
quarter test.
Percentage of learners attaining Yes There was an Provision of Project Learners who
proficient level or better in Stage 2 improvement numeracy CRISTINA belong to the
numeracy standards of the result materials. non-numerates
Improved number of learners  Grade 4 : 75% from the
attaining proficient level or  Grade 5 : 53% conduct of
better in Stage 2 numeracy  Grade 6 : 52%
standards Pre-test and
the result of
the 1st
quarter test.
Improved number of ALS Percentage of Alternative Learning
learners passing the A&E System (ALS) learners pass the A&E
 test
 Elementary =
test
 Secondary =

Graduation rate Yes For the Last 3 The Conduct of -

SY: 2019-2020 = 100% SY the school encourageme classroom
Improved graduation rate SY:2020-2021 = 100% has 100% nt of teachers meetings.
SY:2021-2022 =100%
graduation to the parents
Rate and learners

4. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE in RESILIENCY AND WELL-BEING

B.2 CURRENTLY
B.5 GROUPS
CONTRIBUTING B.3 Inhibiting B.4 Projects
A. DIVISION TARGETS B.1 NEEDED DATA THAT REQUIRE
EXPLANATIO Factors Implemented
YES/NO ATTENTION
N
Increased percentage of learners Percentage of affected and displaced Yes The sch. Has zero - Conduct of Anti -
that are resilient and know their learners retained in schools affected and Bullying Orientation
rights and have the life skills to displaced learners
protect themselves. 0% retained in school.
Percentage of learners who reported Yes No reported and - Conduct of Anti -
violence committed against them by other recorded Bullying Orientation
learners (bullying) or adults (child abuse) committed violence
based on intake sheets of schools against other
0% learners.
Percentage of learners who are happy and Yes Learners from the - Implementation of -
satisfied with their basic education start of classes face to face classes.
experience in relation to the enjoyment of were all happy and
their specific rights in school and learning satisfied that they
centers are now in school.
100%
Percentage of learners who know their Yes Learners come to - Full Implementation -
rights TO and IN education, and how to sch. Everyday. of Face to Face
claim them positively classes.
100%
Percentage of schools and learning Yes School is - Full Implementation -
centers significantly manifesting implementing the of Face to Face
indicators of RBE in the learning RBE- Rights-based classes.
environment Education
100%
Learners Satisfaction Rating on Rights- Yes School is - Full Implementation -
based Education implementing the of Face to Face
 95% RBE- Rights-based classes.
Education
Percentage of schools significantly Yes School is - Full Implementation -
manifesting indicators of RBE implementing the of Face to Face
100% RBE- Rights-based classes.
Education
Increased number of learners
Percentage of DepEd personnel in SDO, 100% All DepEd - Day to Day -
provided with rights-based
and schools/learning centers who know personnel know the activities infusion of
education framework at all levels.
the rights of children and learners in rights of children RBE
relation to RBE, and are able to infuse and infuse them in
them in their respective jobs/duties their jobs abd
duties
Percentage of learners equipped with Yes 100% of learners - Conduct of NSED -
capacities on what to do before, during, are equipped with
and after a disaster/emergency capacities incase of
100% disaster and
Increased percentage of learners
emergencies
protected from natural and
Percentage of learners in safe schools Yes Safety of learners - Regular conduct of -
human-induced hazards.
100% in and out of Safety Inspection .
classroom is
always taken into
consideration
Percentage of students with improved Yes No record of - Implementation of -
Increased number of learners to health statistics Health problems the SBFP.
have the basic physical, mental, 100% for the 1st quarter
and emotional fortitude to cope Percentage of learners with improved Yes No record of - Implementation of -
with various challenges in life. physical fitness level Health problems the SBFP.
100% for the 1st quarter

5. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE in GOVERNANCE

A. DIVISION TARGETS B1. DATA NEEDED B2. CURRENTLY B3. B4. PROJECTS GROUPS THAT
CONTRIBUTING INHIBITING IMPLEMENTE REQUIRE
YES/NO EXPLANATION FACTORS D ATTENTION
Increased proportion of schools Current SBM Level of Practice Yes Maintained level The effect of Project “SBM Stakeholders who need
 Level 1 1 for 2 years. covid 19 Level Up” to be oriented on their
achieving higher levels of SBM pandemic which participation/importanc
practice affected many e in school.
groups of people.
Increased proportion of offices OPCR ratings for the last 3 years Yes Teachers were not The “Kung Kaya Mo,
across governance levels with able to meet the implementation Kaya Ko”
2019-2020=4.312 desired results for
very satisfactory and higher of modular Program
2020-2021=4.120 the latest year instruction.
ratings in the Office
Performance Commitment and 2021-2022=4.166
Review
Ratio on the classroom, teachers,
Yes
textbooks, seats, Science and Math
Increased proportion of schools
equipment, and ICT Package /E-
achieving the ideal ratio on the
classroom
classroom, teachers, textbooks,
Pupil -Classroom Ratio= 1:28
seats, Science and Math
Pupil-Teacher Ratio = 1:28
equipment, and ICT Package /E-
Pupil-textbook Ratio = 1:2
classroom
Pupil – Science/Math Equipment Ratio=
ICT =

No Library Room,
With Electricity connection
Increased the proportion of Yes No excess room - - -
elementary schools with With 1 Broad Band Internet Connection for library
functional libraries, connection to Has electricity
electricity, connection to internet connection
functional library Internet
connection thru
Broad Band
Increased the client satisfaction Client satisfaction rating (for the last 4 Yes Client - Orientation to -
rating of DepEd offices’ years) satisfaction personnel in the
respective stakeholders (internal 95% rating id offices concerned.
& external) increasing.
Increased percentage of the Financial contribution of international and Yes Stakeholders - Frequent -
financial contribution of local grant development partners internal and communication to
international and local grant P40,119.50 external are stakeholders.
 always ready to
support the
development partners vis-à-vis school
the national education budget
(including adopting a school,
Brigada Eskwela)

Functional SGC established (per SY for SGC is

the last 4 years) Yes IATF Health
established but
Increase the proportion of not so functional protocols
schools with functional SGC during the
pandemic. -
-
 GAP ANALYSIS TEMPLATE

Identifying PIAs Template (Annex 4)

School Improvement Planning
IDENTIFY PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT AREAS
Instruction: Using the matrix on the next page, please rate each improvement area on five criteria using a 5-point scale as described
below:
Criteria Description Scale
Strategic importance The number of other areas that will benefit 5 – Very High
when the improvement area as addressed 4 – High
Urgency The urgency or need to improve the area as 3 – Moderate
soon as possible 2 – Low
Magnitude The number of learners that will benefit when 1- Very Low
the improvement area is addressed
Feasibility The degree to which the improvement area is
within the schools mandate and control

Afterwards, compute the average rating of each improvement area and interpret the results as follows:
Average Rating Interpretation
4.5-5.0 Very High
Priority
3.5-4.49 High Priority
2.5-3.49 Moderate
 Priority
1.5-2.49 Low Priority
1.0-1.49 Very Low
Priority

Improvement Areas
Access
Improvement Strategic Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Average Interpretation
Areas Importance
Community 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
Intake Rate
Enrolment Very
5 5 5 5 5
High Priority
Participation 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
Rate
Transition Rate 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
Dropout Rate 3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
School Leaver
3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
Rate
Retention Rate 3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority

Equity
Improvement Strategic Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Average Interpretation
Areas Importance
Retention Rate 3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
Functional
3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
Literacy
Numeracy 3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
21st Century 3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
 Skills

Quality
Improvement Areas Strategic Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Average Interpretation
Importance
Literacy Level 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
Numeracy Level 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
Completion Rate 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
Graduation Rate 5 5 5 5 5 VHP

Resilience and well-being

Improvement Areas Strategic Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Average Interpretation
Importance
Health and 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
Nutritional Status
Security, peace,
and order
5 5 5 5 5 VHP
situation

School Hazards 5 5 5 5 5 VHP

Incidence of
3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
Bullying
Mental and
Psychosocial 3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
Conditions
Affected and
Displayed Learners 3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
Retained in School
Learners who are 3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
 Happy and
Satisfied with their
basic Education
Experience
Learners’
Awareness on Their
Rights TO and IN
3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
Education ,and
How to Claim
Positively
Learners Equipped
with capacities on
what to do
3 3 3 4 3.25 Moderate Priority
before,during,and
after a
disaster/emergency

Governance
Improvement Areas Strategic Urgency Magnitude Feasibility Average Interpretation
Importance
Human Resources 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
School Resources 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
Development 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
prospects, SBM
practice, and
partnership.
OPCRF 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
School Governing 5 5 5 5 5 VHP
Council