Analyzing Arguments
Analyzing Arguments
Department of Education
Region III – Central Luzon
Schools Division Of Pampanga
L. Gomez Subd. San Matias, Sto. Tomas, Pampanga
Tel. No. (045) 436-0669 Email Ad. [email protected]
I.OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standard The learner understands the principles and uses of a position paper.
I. PROCEDURE:
A. Reviewing previous lesson or presenting the new lesson
1. Preliminaries:
Prayer
Reminder of the classroom health and safety protocols
Checking of Attendance
Quick “Kamustahan”
1. Unlocking of Vocabularies
In order for the class to have a better understanding and to analyse arguments, they need to undertand first
the helpful terms that they will encounter throughout the discussion.
a. Argument - is a claim or set of claims with reasons and evidences offered as support. It is a line of
reasoning meant to demonstrate the truth or falsehood of something.
E. Continuation of the discussion of new concepts (Pagtalakay ng bagong konsepto at paglalahad ng bagong
kasanayan #2)
2) Evidences- these are materials and resources the arguer use to convince the audience. These are proofs
to strengthen the author’s claim.
Types of Evidence:
a) Personal Experience
b) Reasons
c) Confirmed Facts
d) Statistics
e) Research by Expert
F. Developing mastery
DAY 4: November 10, 2022.
OBJECTIVE #3: Analyze various types of arguments used by writer/s in manifestos.
The class will split off into its several groups. Each group will read the article below and analyze Jeff Gore's position
in the article "Is it Time to Ditch the Penny? The teacher will next present a table for the students to fill out with the
necessary data.
Yes In the 1920s, two pennies would buy you a newspaper from a street vendor. These days, people don’t even bother
picking up pennies off the street.
The sad fact that a century of initiation has eroded the value of the penny to the point that they’re no longer useful as a
currency; indeed, continuing to use the penny actually slows down cash transactions.
What’s more, the U.S. Mint calculates that the last eight years, it has cost more than a penny to make a penny, highlighting
the silliness of continuing to produce the coin. At a time when the federal budget is under increasing stress, the government
should not be wasting valuable resources to make a coin that nobody wants.
If the penny isn’t useful as a currency, then why are we still minting it? One reason is that some businesses such as zinc
suppliers, continue to lobby to prevent its elimination.
Coins have been used as currency for thousands of years- they were minted in ancient Greece and Persia- but inflation
requires that we periodically reform our coinage systems. Canada, which has a monetary system very similar to that the
United States, retired its penny in 2012. As one member of the Canadian Parliament’s Senate Finance Committee noted at
the time, the penny “slows down the line of grocery stores and ends up under our couches.” Remarkably, the penny has
been the lowest-denomination coin the U.S. for more than 150 years, since the half-penny was discontinued in 1857.
A simple way to retire the penny would be the round cash transactions up to down to the nearest nickel.
This is the way pricing is already done on U.S. military bases overseas. It is past time for the entire country to follow this no-
nonsense approach and retire the penny.
Author/Credentials
Claim/Reason 1
Claim/Reason 3
not what we often used in everyday language which refers to a heated dispute, a quarrel, a shouting match to
see who wins or not in making a point.
In academic writing, you can never establish a point without an argument. In fact, making an argument
expressing a point of view on a subject and supporting it with evidence is the aim of academic writing. It is a
reason or set of reasons given with the aim of letting others believe with you that an action or an idea is right or
wrong backed up with evidence to support it. It has premises and a conclusion (claim).
H. Evaluating learning
DAY 5: November 11, 2022
On a ¼ sheet paper and a 15 points quiz, the students will identify the the claims in the following paragraph
“The Arguments For and Against Prioritizing Younger Patients with COVID-19”.
1. Being younger than someone else is not a satisfactory criterion on its own. Being 18 years old versus
19 years old would not be any different than a coin toss or a first come, first served policy, he wrote.
2. Everyone should have an opportunity to lead a life of a certain duration. This leads to those who have
already led a life of certain duration to be passed over for lifesaving treatments over those who have
not yet done so. While a compelling angle, Archard wrote that there is no consensus on what can
count as a fair innings.
3. Archard wrote that if age was to be a criterion for life-saving healthcare, then it would imply a
devaluation of older people. “Such discrimination publicly expresses the view that older people are of
lesser worth or importance than young people,” he said, adding that it contributes to the view that
older people are second class citizens.
Students will answer the following questions below and create a five-sentence paragraph on a whole sheet
of paper.