0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views2 pages

(17-004532 199) ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE Judge G. Joseph Curley, Jr.

This order requires opposing parties to respond within 5 days to a motion for reconsideration of a summary judgment order filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Stephanie Schneider. The order instructs parties to simultaneously provide any response to the court via email.

Uploaded by

lschneider68
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views2 pages

(17-004532 199) ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE Judge G. Joseph Curley, Jr.

This order requires opposing parties to respond within 5 days to a motion for reconsideration of a summary judgment order filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Stephanie Schneider. The order instructs parties to simultaneously provide any response to the court via email.

Uploaded by

lschneider68
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Filing# 160362409 E-Filed 11/01/2022 10: 13:21 AM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT


IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION AI


CASE NO.50-20 17-CA-004532-XXXX-MB

TH E OAKS AT BOCA RATON PROPERTY


OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC.,
P laintiff/Pc titioner
vs ,

PY
LAURENCE S. SCHNEIDER,
STEPHANIE L. SCHNEIDER,
c t al.,

CO
Defendant/Respondents.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE

D
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Dcfendant/Cotmter-Plaintiff Stephanie
IE
Schneider's Motion for Reconsideration of the Order on Defendants ' Motion for Stnnmary
IF
Judgment, filed on October 27, 2022. After review, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that opposing parties arc given five (5) days to respond
RT

to Defendant/Co tmtcr-Plaintiff Stephanie Schneider's Motion for Reconsideration of the Order


on Defendants ' Motion for Stnnmary JtKlgment. A co py of the response is to be simultaneo u.51y
CE

provided to the Court at CAD-DjyjsjonAJ@J.?bcgoy.org.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach Co tmty,
A

Florida.
T
O
N

50-2017-CA-004532-XXXX -MB 11/01/2022


G. Joseph Curley, Jr.
Cholit Judge

CO PIES TO:

VUTH UN, ESQ. SACHS SAX CAPLAN [email protected]


6111 BROKEN SOUND forcclos [email protected]
PARKWAY N W, SUITE200 [email protected]
BOCA RATON, FL 334 87

Page 1 of2
FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK, 11 /01/2022 10:13:21 AM
Case No.50-20 17-CA-004532-XXXX-MB

JOSEF M. FIALA, ESQ. VERNIS & BOWLING OF jfiala@ floricla-law.com


PALM BEACH, P.A. [email protected]
6 18 U.S. HIGHWAY ONE, cschracler@ floricla-law.com
SUITE200 pbfiling@ floricla-law.com
NORTH PALM BEACH, FL
33408
MARTIN G. McCARTHY, MCCARTHY & YERSEL, mccarthy@ myattomeyservices.

PY
ESQ. PLLC com
4929 SW 74TH CT. eyersel@ myattomeyservices.c
MIAMI, FL 33 155 om

CO
lawclerk@ myattomeyservices.c
om
SHEILA MESA, ESQ. SIOLI ALEXNADER PINO [email protected]
9155 S. DADELAND BLVD., [email protected]

D
SUITE 1600
MIAMI, FL 33 156
IE
IF
RT
CE
A
T
O
N

Page 2 of 2

You might also like