Mathmatician
Mathmatician
Biography
Name
While there is a tendency to misspell his name as "Aryabhatta" by analogy with other names
having the "bhatta" suffix, his name is properly spelled Aryabhata: every astronomical text spells
his name thus,[7] including Brahmagupta's references to him "in more than a hundred places by
name".[1] Furthermore, in most instances "Aryabhatta" would not fit the metre either. [7]
Works
Aryabhata is the author of several treatises on mathematics and astronomy, some of which are
lost.
His major work, Aryabhatiya, a compendium of mathematics and astronomy, was extensively
referred to in the Indian mathematical literature and has survived to modern times. The
mathematical part of the Aryabhatiya covers arithmetic, algebra, plane trigonometry,
and spherical trigonometry. It also contains continued fractions, quadratic equations, sums-of-
power series, and a table of sines.
The Arya-siddhanta, a lost work on astronomical computations, is known through the writings of
Aryabhata's contemporary, Varahamihira, and later mathematicians and commentators,
including Brahmagupta and Bhaskara I. This work appears to be based on the older Surya
Siddhanta and uses the midnight-day reckoning, as opposed to sunrise in Aryabhatiya. It also
contained a description of several astronomical instruments: the gnomon (shanku-yantra), a
shadow instrument (chhAyA-yantra), possibly angle-measuring devices, semicircular and circular
(dhanur-yantra / chakra-yantra), a cylindrical stick yasti-yantra, an umbrella-shaped device called
the chhatra-yantra, and water clocks of at least two types, bow-shaped and cylindrical. [8]
A third text, which may have survived in the Arabic translation, is Al ntf or Al-nanf. It claims that it
is a translation by Aryabhata, but the Sanskrit name of this work is not known.
Probably dating from the 9th century, it is mentioned by the Persian scholar and chronicler of
India, Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī.[
Srinivasa Iyengar Ramanujan
22 December 1887 – 26 April 1920) was an Indian mathematical genius and autodidact who
lived during the British Raj. Though he had almost no formal training in pure mathematics, he
made substantial contributions to mathematical analysis, number theory, infinite series,
and continued fractions, including solutions to mathematical problems considered to be
unsolvable. Ramanujan initially developed his own mathematical research in isolation; it was
quickly recognized by Indian mathematicians. Seeking mathematicians who could understand his
work, in 1913 he began a postal partnership with the English mathematician G. H. Hardy at
the University of Cambridge, England. Recognizing the extraordinary work sent to him as
samples, Hardy arranged travel for Ramanujan to Cambridge. In his notes, Ramanujan had
produced new groundbreaking theorems, including some that Hardy stated had 'defeated [him
and his colleagues] completely', in addition to rediscovering recently proven - but highly
advanced - results.
During his short life, Ramanujan independently compiled nearly 3,900 results
(mostly identities and equations).[1] Many were completely novel; his original and highly
unconventional results, such as the Ramanujan prime, the Ramanujan theta
function, partition formulae, and mock theta functions, have opened entire new areas of work and
inspired a vast amount of further research.[2] Nearly all his claims have now been proven correct.
The Ramanujan Journal, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, was established to publish work in
[3]
Riemannian geometry[edit]
Riemann's published works opened up research areas combining analysis with geometry. These
would subsequently become major parts of the theories of Riemannian geometry, algebraic
geometry, and complex manifold theory. The theory of Riemann surfaces was elaborated
by Felix Klein and particularly Adolf Hurwitz. This area of mathematics is part of the foundation
of topology and is still being applied in novel ways to mathematical physics.
In 1853, Gauss asked his student Riemann to prepare a Habilitationsschrift on the foundations of
geometry. Over many months, Riemann developed his theory of higher dimensions and
delivered his lecture at Göttingen in 1854 entitled "Ueber die Hypothesen welche der Geometrie
zu Grunde liegen" ("On the hypotheses which underlie geometry"). It was only published twelve
years later in 1868 by Dedekind, two years after his death. Its early reception appears to have
been slow but it is now recognized as one of the most important works in geometry.
The subject founded by this work is Riemannian geometry. Riemann found the correct way to
extend into n dimensions the differential geometry of surfaces, which Gauss himself proved in
his theorema egregium. The fundamental object is called the Riemann curvature tensor. For the
surface case, this can be reduced to a number (scalar), positive, negative, or zero; the non-zero
and constant cases being models of the known non-Euclidean geometries.
Riemann's idea was to introduce a collection of numbers at every point in space (i.e., a tensor)
which would describe how much it was bent or curved. Riemann found that in four spatial
dimensions, one needs a collection of ten numbers at each point to describe the properties of
a manifold, no matter how distorted it is. This is the famous construction central to his geometry,
known now as a Riemannian metric.
Number theory[edit]
He made some famous contributions to modern analytic number theory. In a single short paper,
the only one he published on the subject of number theory, he investigated the zeta function that
now bears his name, establishing its importance for understanding the distribution of prime
numbers. The Riemann hypothesis was one of a series of conjectures he made about the
function's properties.
In Riemann's work there are many more interesting developments. He proved the functional
equation for the zeta function (already known to Euler), behind which a theta function lies. Also, it
gives a better approximation for the prime-counting function than Gauss's function
. Through the summation of this approximation function over the non-trivial zeros on the
line with real portion 1/2, he gave an exact, "explicit formula" for .
Riemann knew Chebyshev's work on the Prime Number Theorem. He had visited Dirichlet in
1852. But Riemann's methods were very different.
Pythagoras of Samos
Legend and obfuscation cloud his work, so it is uncertain whether he truly contributed
much to mathematics or natural philosophy. Many of the accomplishments credited to
Pythagoras may actually have been accomplishments of his colleagues or successors.
Some accounts mention that the philosophy associated with Pythagoras was related to
mathematics and that numbers were important. It was said that he was the first man to
call himself a philosopher, or lover of wisdom,[5] and Pythagorean ideas exercised a
marked influence on Plato, and through him, all of Western philosophy. Pythagorean
theorem
Main article: Pythagorean theorem
See also: Thales' theorem
Since the fourth century AD, Pythagoras has commonly been given credit for discovering
the Pythagorean theorem, a theorem in geometry that states that in a right-angled triangle the
area of the square on the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of
According to legend, the way Pythagoras discovered that musical notes could be translated into
mathematical equations was when he passed blacksmiths at work one day and thought that the
sounds emanating from their anvils were beautiful and harmonious and decided that whatever
scientific law caused this to happen must be mathematical and could be applied to music. He
went to the blacksmiths to learn how the sounds were produced by looking at their tools. He
discovered that it was because the hammers were "simple ratios of each other, one was half the
size of the first, another was 2/3 the size, and so on".
This legend has since proven to be false by virtue of the fact that these ratios are only relevant to
string length (such as the string of a monochord), and not to hammer weight.[71][72] However, it may
be that Pythagoras was indeed responsible for discovering the properties of string length.
The Swiss Bernoulli brothers, James and John, were the first to achieve a
full understanding of Leibniz’s presentation of the calculus. Their
subsequent publications did much to make the subject widely known to the
rest of the continent.
James Bernoulli, the elder of the two, entered the University of Basel in
1671, receiving a master’s degree in theology two years later and a licentiate
(a degree just below the doctorate) in theology in 1676. Meanwhile, he was
teaching himself mathematics, much against the wishes of his merchant
father. Bernoulli spent two years in France familiarizing himself with
Descartes’ Géométrie and the work of his followers. By 1687, he had
sufficient mathematical reputation to be appointed to a vacant post at Basel.
He also wrote to Leibniz in the same year, asking to be shown his new
methods. This proved difficult because Leibniz’s abbreviated explanations
were full of errors. Still, Bernoulli mastered the material within several
years and went on to make contributions to the calculus equal to those of
Leibniz himself.
converges; but he confessed his inability to find the sum of the latter series.
(Euler succeeded in finding its sum.) In 1690 he established what is known
as the "Bernoullian inequality,"
The Swiss Bernoulli brothers, James and John, were the first to achieve a
full understanding of Leibniz’s presentation of the calculus. Their
subsequent publications did much to make the subject widely known to the
rest of the continent.
James Bernoulli, the elder of the two, entered the University of Basel in
1671, receiving a master’s degree in theology two years later and a licentiate
(a degree just below the doctorate) in theology in 1676. Meanwhile, he was
teaching himself mathematics, much against the wishes of his merchant
father. Bernoulli spent two years in France familiarizing himself with
Descartes’ Géométrie and the work of his followers. By 1687, he had
sufficient mathematical reputation to be appointed to a vacant post at Basel.
He also wrote to Leibniz in the same year, asking to be shown his new
methods. This proved difficult because Leibniz’s abbreviated explanations
were full of errors. Still, Bernoulli mastered the material within several
years and went on to make contributions to the calculus equal to those of
Leibniz himself.
Mathematician[edit]
Although the mathematical notion of function was implicit in trigonometric and logarithmic tables,
which existed in his day, Leibniz was the first, in 1692 and 1694, to employ it explicitly, to denote
any of several geometric concepts derived from a curve, such
as abscissa, ordinate, tangent, chord, and the perpendicular.[68] In the 18th century, "function" lost
these geometrical associations.
Leibniz was the first to see that the coefficients of a system of linear equations could be arranged
into an array, now called a matrix, which can be manipulated to find the solution of the system, if
any. This method was later called Gaussian elimination. Leibniz's discoveries of Boolean
algebra and of symbolic logic, also relevant to mathematics, are discussed in the preceding
section. The best overview of Leibniz's writings on calculus may be found in Bos (1974). [69]
Calculus[edit]
Leibniz is credited, along with Sir Isaac Newton, with the discovery of calculus (differential and
integral calculus). According to Leibniz's notebooks, a critical breakthrough occurred on
November 11, 1675, when he employed integral calculus for the first time to find the area under
the graph of a function y = f(x).[70] He introduced several notations used to this day, for instance
the integral sign ∫, representing an elongated S, from the Latin word summa, and the d used
for differentials, from the Latin word differentia. This cleverly suggestive notation for calculus is
probably his most enduring mathematical legacy. Leibniz did not publish anything about his
calculus until 1684.[71] Leibniz expressed the inverse relation of integration and differentiation,
later called the fundamental theorem of calculus, by means of a figure[72] in his 1693
paper Supplementum geometriae dimensoriae....[73]However, James Gregory is credited for the
theorem's discovery in geometric form, Isaac Barrow proved a more generalized geometric
version, and Newton developed supporting theory. The concept became more transparent as
developed through Leibniz's formalism and new notation. [74] The product rule of differential
calculus is still called "Leibniz's law". In addition, the theorem that tells how and when to
differentiate under the integral sign is called the Leibniz integral rule.
Leibniz exploited infinitesimals in developing calculus, manipulating them in ways suggesting that
they had paradoxical algebraic properties. George Berkeley, in a tract called The Analyst and
also in De Motu, criticized these. A recent study argues that Leibnizian calculus was free of
contradictions, and was better grounded than Berkeley's empiricist criticisms
Georg Ferdinand Ludwig Philipp Cantor
Mathematical work[edit]
Cantor's work between 1874 and 1884 is the origin of set theory.[31] Prior to this work, the concept
of a set was a rather elementary one that had been used implicitly since the beginning of
mathematics, dating back to the ideas of Aristotle. No one had realized that set theory had any
nontrivial content. Before Cantor, there were only finite sets (which are easy to understand) and
"the infinite" (which was considered a topic for philosophical, rather than mathematical,
discussion). By proving that there are (infinitely) many possible sizes for infinite sets, Cantor
established that set theory was not trivial, and it needed to be studied. Set theory has come to
play the role of a foundational theory in modern mathematics, in the sense that it interprets
propositions about mathematical objects (for example, numbers and functions) from all the
traditional areas of mathematics (such as algebra, analysis and topology) in a single theory, and
provides a standard set of axioms to prove or disprove them. The basic concepts of set theory
are now used throughout mathematics.[32]
In one of his earliest papers,[33] Cantor proved that the set of real numbers is "more numerous"
than the set of natural numbers; this showed, for the first time, that there exist infinite sets of
different sizes. He was also the first to appreciate the importance of one-to-one
correspondences (hereinafter denoted "1-to-1 correspondence") in set theory. He used this
concept to define finite and infinite sets, subdividing the latter into denumerable (or countably
infinite) sets and uncountable sets (nondenumerable infinite sets).[34]
Cantor developed important concepts in topology and their relation to cardinality. For example,
he showed that the Cantor set is nowhere dense, but has the same cardinality as the set of all
real numbers, whereas the rationals are everywhere dense, but countable.
Cantor introduced fundamental constructions in set theory, such as the power set of a set A,
which is the set of all possible subsets of A. He later proved that the size of the power set of A is
strictly larger than the size of A, even when A is an infinite set; this result soon became known
as Cantor's theorem. Cantor developed an entire theory and arithmetic of infinite sets,
called cardinals and ordinals, which extended the arithmetic of the natural numbers. His notation
for the cardinal numbers was the Hebrew letter (aleph) with a natural number subscript;
for the ordinals he employed the Greek letter ω (omega). This notation is still in use today.
Archimedes of Syracuse
Mathematics
While he is often regarded as a designer of mechanical devices, Archimedes also made
contributions to the field of mathematics. Plutarchwrote: "He placed his whole affection and
ambition in those purer speculations where there can be no reference to the vulgar needs of
life."[51] Archimedes was able to use infinitesimals in a way that is similar to modern integral
calculus. Through proof by contradiction (reductio ad absurdum), he could give answers to
problems to an arbitrary degree of accuracy, while specifying the limits within which the answer
lay. This technique is known as the method of exhaustion, and he employed it to approximate the
value of π. In Measurement of a Circle he did this by drawing a larger regular hexagon outside
a circle and a smaller regular hexagon inside the circle, and progressively doubling the number
of sides of each regular polygon, calculating the length of a side of each polygon at each step. As
the number of sides increases, it becomes a more accurate approximation of a circle. After four
such steps, when the polygons had 96 sides each, he was able to determine that the value of π
lay between 31/7 (approximately 3.1429) and 310/71 (approximately 3.1408), consistent with its
actual value of approximately 3.1416.[52] He also proved that the area of a circle was equal to π
multiplied by the square of the radius of the circle (πr2). In On the Sphere and Cylinder,
Archimedes postulates that any magnitude when added to itself enough times will exceed any
given magnitude. This is the Archimedean property of real numbers.[53]
As proven by Archimedes, the area of the parabolic segment in the upper figure is equal to 4/3 that of the
inscribed triangle in the lower figure.
Thales' theorems
There are two theorems of Thales in elementary geometry, one known as Thales'
theorem having to do with a triangle inscribed in a circle and having the circle's diameter as one
leg, the other theorem being also called the intercept theorem. In addition Eudemus attributed to
him the discovery that a circle is bisected by its diameter, that the base angles of an isosceles
triangle are equal and that vertical angles are equal. According to a historical Note,
[32]
when Thales visited Egypt, he observed that whenever the Egyptians drew two intersecting
lines, they would measure the vertical angles to make sure that they were equal. Thales
concluded that one could prove that all vertical angles are equal if one accepted some general
notions such as: all straight angles are equal, equals added to equals are equal, and equals
subtracted from equals are equal.
Newton was the master of all sciences. He did a considerable amount of work in chemistry
and alchemy. He also conducted several researches other than science which were in
theology, prophecy and history. Though he rejected the sacrament and shunned many other
religious beliefs for being superstitious and illogical, Newton can be called a Unitarian for his
passion to combine knowledge and faith.