Corticosteroid and Antifungal Alternative Treatments For Seborrheic Dermatitis: A Review
Corticosteroid and Antifungal Alternative Treatments For Seborrheic Dermatitis: A Review
Review Articles
Corticosteroid and Antifungal Alternative Treatments for Seboreik Dermatit Için Kortikosteroid ve Antifungal Alternatif
Seborrheic Dermatitis: A Review Tedaviler: Bir Derleme
SUMMARY ÖZ
Alternative therapy is increasingly utilized as adjuncts to most Seboreik dermatit (SD) için geleneksel tedavilerle (topikal
commonly used conventional treatments (such as topical antifungal antifungal ve kortikosteroid gibi) ilaveten alternatif tedavilerin
kullanımı çoğaltmaya başlamıştır. Topikal antifungal ilaçlar
and corticosteroid) of seborrheic dermatitis (SD). Topical antifungal değişen başarı oranlarıyla yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır ve topikal
medications have been used with varying success, and long-term kortikosteroidlerin uzun süreli kullanımının çeşitli yan etkileri olduğu
use of topical corticosteroid is widely known to cause various side iyi bilinmektedir. Bu makalede, mevcut alternatif tedaviler ve yan
effects. This article reviews trial studies of SD therapies other than etkileri hakkında bilgi vermek amacıyla, kortikosteroid ve antifungal
corticosteroid and antifungal, aiming to offer information regarding dışı SD tedavilerine ait klinik çalışmalar derlenmektedir. Çalışma
existing alternative therapies and their side effects. Searches PRISMA kılavuzlarına dayanarak Pubmed ve Cochrane veri
were performed on PubMed and Cochrane database focusing on tabanlarından araştırılan klinik calışmalara odaklanmaktadır. Veri
clinical trials according to the PRISMA guidelines. A total 317 tabanı araştırmalarından bulunan toplam 317 çalışma içerisinden
studies were identified from database searching. After duplicate duplikasyonların çıkarılması ve uygunluk taraması yapıldıktan sonra
40 çalışma nihai analize dahil edilmiştir. Bu çalışmada incelenen
removal and eligibility screening, 40 studies were included in alternatif tedavi yaklaşımları: bitkisel içerikler (el kremleri ve bitkisel
the final analysis. Alternative modalities reviewed in this study şampuanlar, Myrtus communis L., Quassia amara, çay ağacı yağı,
include: herbal ingredients (herbal shampoo and handcream, Vitreoscilla filiformis), kalsinörin inhibitörleri, bal, izotretinoin,
Myrtus communis L., Quassia amara, tea tree oil, Vitreoscilla lipohidroksi asit, lityum, metronidazol, fototerapi, nikotinamid,
filiformis), calcineurin inhibitor, honey, isotretinoin, lipohydroxy oral homeopatik çözelti, üre-laktik asit-propilen glikol (K301)
acid, lithium, metronidazole, phototherapy, nicotinamide, oral çözeltisi ve çinko piritiyon. Bitkisel içerikler için aktif maddelere ait
homeopathic solution, solution of urea-lactic acid-propylene glycol herhangi bir standardizasyon, saflık tayini ya da konsatrasyona ait
(K301), and zinc pyrithione. For herbal ingredients, there is still no açık bilgiler bulunmamaktadır. Bitkisel olmayan tedaviler arasında
standardisation of active ingredients, purity, or concentrations. The pozitif klinik iyileşme ile sonuçlanan kalsinörin inhibitörleri en çok
çalışılanlardır (pimekrolimus için 12 çalışma, takrolimus için 5
most highly studied non-herbal alternative therapy was calcineurin çalışma bulunmaktadır). Hafif yanma hissi, kızarıklık ve kaşıntılar
inhibitors (pimecrolimus with twelve studies and tacrolimus with en çok görülen yan etkilerdendir. Tedavilerin çoğunluğu olumlu ve
five studies) that yielded positive clinical improvements. The most güvenli sonuçlar gösterdiği halde, bu tedavilerin uzun süreli kullanım
common side effects observed were mild burning sensations, erythema, için hastalara tavsiye edilmeden önce daha fazla araştırma yapılması
and pruritus. While most therapies appear to be beneficial and safe, gerekmektedir.
further research is necessary before these therapies can be consistently
recommended to patients, especially for long-term use.
Key Words: Seborrheic dermatitis, alternative treatment, Anahtar kelimeler: Seboreik dermatit, alternatif tedavi,
antifungal, corticosteroid, herbal, calcineurin inhibitor antifungal, kortikosteroid, bitkisel, kalsinörin inhibitörleri
Received: 27.07.2019
Revised: 18.11.2019
Accepted: 25.12.2019
*
ORCID: 0000-0002-6232-6714 , Brawijaya Tingkat III General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
º
Corresponding Author: Anita Maria Djunaidi
Brawijaya Tingkat III General Hospital, Kesatriyan 17, Surabaya 60242, Indonesia,
Phone/Fax : +6231 5682088 / +6231 5611272,
Email: [email protected]
77
Djunaidi
78
FABAD J. Pharm. Sci., 45, 1, 77-89, 2020
Duplicates n = 92
Excluded n = 172
Irrelevant studies = 127
No abstract available = 6
Publication date prior to January 1st, 2000 = 37
In vitro study = 2
Excluded n = 13
No full-text article available = 6
Full-text languages other than English = 7
RESULTS
Table 1. Studies on alternative treatments for seborrheic dermatitis
Alternative treatment; Ref- Number Treatment method /Dura- Results Adverse Effects
erence of tion (weeks)
patients
Herbal and Zinc Pyrithione 50 Shampoo at least twice A reduction in erythema No adverse side effects were
Shampoo and Scalp Lotion. weekly and the scalp lotion and flaking. noted.
(Barak-Shinar & Green, 2018) was used daily before bed-
time for 42 days.
Honey. 30 Honey was applied every A reduction in itching, No adverse side effects were
(Al-Waili, 2001) other day for 4 weeks. scaling, and skin lesions. noted.
Improved patients were Subjective improvement in
then divided into 2 groups, hair loss. Prophylactic group
treatment was applied once experienced no relapse
weekly for 6 months. compared to control group.
Prophylactic group:
honey.
Control group: vehicle.
Isotretioin 10mg oral. 45 Treatment for 6 months. In group ISO, a reduction in Group ISO: Cheilitis, abnor-
(de Souza Leão Kamamoto, Group ISO: 10mg rate of sebum production. mal serum lipids, body and
Sanudo, Hassun, & Bagatin, isotretinoin every other Patient opinion, investiga- facial skin fragility, head-
2017) day. tor, and quality of life as- ache, eczema, eye problems,
Group X: topical treat- sessments improved in both nosebleeds.
ment (antiseborrheic groups. Less frequent: muscle ache,
shampoo three times herpes simplex, tiredness,
weekly, salicylic acid joint ache, pruritus, mood
soap twice daily). change, abnormal liver
function.
79
Djunaidi
Isotretinoin oral in very low 11 Treatment for 6 months. A reduction in sebum Facial redness, dryness of
dose. Group I: 5mg daily. production and sebaceous eyes and conjunctivitis,
(Geißler, Michelsen, & Group II: 2.5 mg daily. gland size in all groups. A cheilitis, dry vestibulitis in
Plewig, 2003) Group III: 2.5 mg three reduction of lipids in group group I and II.
times weekly. I and II.
Lipohydroxy acid containing 100 Every other day for 4 weeks. The tolerance, the global No adverse side effects were
shampoo. Group I: 0.1% lipohy- efficacy, and cosmetic ac- noted.
(Seite, Rougier, & Talarico, droxy acid (LHA) and ceptability of group I were
2009) 1.3% salicylic acid. significantly better.
Group II: 5% ci-
clopiroxolamine (CPO),
3% salicylic acid, and
0.5% menthol.
Lithium gluconate. 129 Twice daily for 8 weeks. Clinical remission is better Mild erythema and burning.
(Dreno & Moyse, 2002) Group I: 8% lithium in group I.
gluconate.
Group II: placebo
Lithium gluconate. 557 Twice daily for 8 weeks. In ITT and PP group, sat- Erythema, burning, dryness,
(Dreno, Chosidow, Revuz, Intent to treat protocol isfaction rate was higher in and upper respiratory tract
Moyse, & STUDY INVESTI- (ITT): 288 patients. those with lithium treat- infections. Lithium gluco-
GATOR GROUP, 2003) Patients protocol (PP): ment. nate was found to be sticky.
269 patients.
Metronidazole 0.75% gel. 67 Treatment gel or placebo for Metronidazole is only as No adverse side effects were
(Ozcan, Seyhan, & Yologlu, 4 weeks and were addition- effective as placebo. The noted.
2007) ally followed up for another disease severity quickly re-
4 weeks. turns to the basal levels after
treatment cessation.
Metronidazole 0.75% gel. 84 Twice daily for 8 weeks. No statistically significant No adverse side effects were
(Koca, Altinyazar, & Eştürk, Group I: 0.75% metro- difference was found be- noted.
2003) nidazole. tween the treatment groups.
Group II: placebo.
Metronidazole 1% gel. 156 Twice daily for 4 weeks. Higher level of satisfaction No adverse side effects were
(Mohamad Goldust, Rezaee, Group I: 2% sertacon- was observed in group I. noted.
& Raghifar, 2013) azole.
Group II: 1% metroni-
dazole.
Metronidazole 1% gel. 56 Twice daily for 8 weeks. In group I, a reduction in Redness and pruritus.
(Siadat, Iraji, Shahmoradi, Group I: 1% metroni- mean SD severity score.
Enshaieh, & Taheri, 2006) dazole.
Group II: placebo.
Myrtus communis L. 90 Once every 3- 4 days for In both groups, significant No adverse side effects were
(Chaijan, Handjani, Zarshe- 30 days. improvement in all outcome noted
nas, Rahimabadi, & Tavakko- Group I: anti-dandruff measures (Excoriation
li, 2018) (Myrtus communis L.) Pruritus Grading, Adherent
shampoo. Scalp Flaking Score, Red-
Group II: anti-dandruff ness of Scalp Skin, Grading
(ketoconazole 2%) of Scalp Skin Involvement).
shampoo.
Narrow-band ultraviolet B 18 Three times weekly until All patients responded well Occasional moderate ery-
(TL-01) phototherapy. absence of symptoms or to a to treatment. Complete thema.
(Pirkhammer, Seeber, Hönigs- maximum of 8 weeks. clearance in 6 patients,
mann, & Tanew, 2000) significant improvement in
12 patients.
Nicotinamide 4% cream. 48 Once daily for 12 weeks. Reduction of 75% of the Minimal burning sensation
(Fabbrocini, Cantelli, & Mon- Group I: 4% nicotin- total score of erythema, and pruritus.
frecola, 2014) amide. scaling, and infiltration
Group II: vehicle cream. using four-point scale was
observed in group I.
80
FABAD J. Pharm. Sci., 45, 1, 77-89, 2020
Novel Herbal-based Cream. 32 Twice daily for 42 days. A reduction in Investigator No adverse side effects were
(Barak-Shinar, Del Río, & Static Global Assessment, noted.
Green, 2017) desquamation (scaling),
induration (inflammation),
and erythema (redness) as
well as self-assessed pruritus
parameters.
Oral Homeopathic Solution. 41 Every morning for 10 The disease state of the Mild stomach upset, stom-
(Smith, Baker, & Williams, weeks. active group was improved ach pain, and nausea.
2002) Active group: homeo- significantly compared to
pathic solution. placebo group.
Placebo group: vehicle
drink.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 21 Twice daily for 14 days. Significant improvement Mild burning.
(de Moraes et al., 2007) from baseline in terms of
erythema, scaling, and
infiltration/population.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 40 Twice daily for 2 weeks. Group I and II have the Mild burning.
(Firooz et al., 2006) Followed up every 2 weeks same efficacy with no signif-
for 4 weeks. icant differences in patients’
Group I: 1% pimecro- baseline data, response to
limus. treatment, and relapse rate.
Group II: 1% hydrocor-
tisone acetate.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 60 Twice daily for 4 weeks. Higher level of satisfaction No adverse side effects were
(M. Goldust, Rezaee, & Ra- Group I: 1% pimecro- was observed group II. noted.
ghifar, 2013) limus.
Group II: 2% sertacon-
azole.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 5 Twice daily for 16 weeks. All participants noted a No adverse side effects were
(High & Pandya, 2006) marked decrease in the noted.
severity.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 20 Twice daily for 4 weeks. Improvements were noted No adverse side effects were
(B. S. Kim et al., 2007) in the global assessment of noted.
disease severity. Relapse was
observed after discontin-
uation.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 48 Twice daily for 6 weeks. In both groups, effective Mild burning, pruritus,
(Koc, Arca, Kose, & Akar, Group I: 1% pimecro- results in clinical severity irritation, and erythema.
2009) limus. scores.
Group II: 2% keto-
conazole.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 16 Twice daily for 2 weeks. Statistically significant Temporary pruritus.
(Ozden, Tekin, Lter, & An- reductions in the scores of
karali, 2010) all parameters (clinically,
4-point score, Visual Ana-
logue Scale).
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 19 Twice daily for 7 days. Subjects’ average assessment Mild burning and irritation.
(Rallis, Nasiopoulou, Kousk- Additional period of 7 days, score was high (9.73).
oukis, & Koumantaki, 2004) if needed, until complete
clearance was achieved.
In cases of recurrence a
5-day course was addition-
ally applied.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 22 Twice daily until absence of In group I, a reduction Mild burning sensation in
(Rigopoulos, Ioannides, symptoms. in erythema, scaling and group I.
Kalogeromitros, Gregoriou, & Group I: 1% pimecro- pruritus, although slightly
Katsambas, 2004) limus. slower than betamethasone,
Group II: 0.1% beta- but it is not statistically
methasone 17-valerate. significant.
81
Djunaidi
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 52 Twice daily until lesions A reduction in pruritus, Pruritus, burning, erythe-
(Tatlican, Eren, & Eskioglu, completely disappeared. erythema, and scaling. The ma.
2009) mean cure and mean remis-
sion times were 13.34 and
47.98 days, respectively.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 96 Twice daily for 4 weeks. The superiority of pimecro- No adverse side effects were
(Warshaw et al., 2007) Group I: 1% pimecro- limus was observed noted.
limus.
Group II: placebo.
Pimecrolimus 1% cream. 30 Group I: cream twice
In all groups, a significant Erythema, localized burn-
(Zhao et al., 2018) daily for 2 weeks, mois- decrease in clinical severity ing sensation, aggravated
turizer twice daily for scores. The improvement of pruritus.
2 weeks. total severity score in Group
Group II: cream twice
III was more remarkable
daily for 2 weeks, then than groups I and II.
once daily for 2 weeks.
Group III: cream twice
daily for 4 weeks.
Quassia amara 60 Twice daily for 4 weeks. In all groups, a decrease in No adverse side effects were
(Borda et al., 2019) Group I: 4% Quassia SD mean severity score. In noted.
amara group I, statistically signif-
Group II: 2% keto- icant difference in avoiding
conazole SD relapse.
Group III: 1% ci-
clopirox olamine
Solution of urea, lactic acid, 299 Study I: once daily ap-
In both studies, 4-weeks Mild burning.
and propylene glycol. plication for 4 weeks of desquamation scores were
(Emtestam, Svensson, & K301 (K301a or K301b) significantly improved for
Rensfeldt, 2012) or placebo, followed by K301 compared to placebo.
maintenance treatment 3
times weekly for 4 weeks
Study II: once daily ap-
plication for 4 weeks of
K301 (a) or placebo.
Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment. 16 Every night until absence of Improvement in all the Mild-to-moderate applica-
(Braza, Dicarlo, Soon, & clinical symptoms, and then mean lesional erythema tion site pruritus ⁄ burning,
Mccall, 2003) for 7 days thereafter. scores, mean scaling, mean mild sunburn.
investigator global assess-
ment, and mean subject
global assessment scores.
Tacrolimus 0.03% cream. 60 Twice daily for 4 weeks. In both groups, significant No adverse side effects were
(Mohamad Goldust, Rezaee, Group I: 2% sertacon- reductions in SI score, signs, noted.
Raghifar, & Hemayat, 2013) azole. and symptoms. In group I,
Group II: 0.03% tacro- a higher level of satisfaction
limus. was observed.
Tacrolimus 0.1% cream. 75 Treatment for 10 weeks. In group I and II, significant Burning and tingling sen-
(T. W. Kim et al., 2013) Group I: cream, twice improvement in erythema, sation.
weekly. scaling and pruritus. The
Group II: cream, once mean recurrence rate ac-
weekly. cording to global assessment
Group III: placebo was significantly higher
twice weekly. in group II compared to
group I.
Tacrolimus 0.1% cream. 18 Treatment daily for 28 days A complete clearance of SD Mild local burning and
(Meshkinpour, Sun, & Wein- or until complete absence of with a grade of 0 for ery- irritation.
stein, 2003) symptoms. thema, scaling, and global
severity.
82
FABAD J. Pharm. Sci., 45, 1, 77-89, 2020
Tacrolimus 0.1% cream. 30 Twice daily for 12 weeks. Tacrolimus 0.1% cream Flushing and irritation in
(Papp, Papp, Dahmer, & Group I: 0.1% tacro- was equally effective as group I.
Clark, 2012) limus. hydrocortisone 1% cream
Group II: 1% hydrocor- but required significantly
tisone. fewer treatment applications
to achieve the same level of
disease control.
Tea tree oil 5% gel. 54 Three times daily for 4 In group I, a reduction in No adverse side effects were
(Roy et al., 2014) weeks. erythema, scaling, itching noted.
Group I: 5% tea tree and greasy crusts
oil gel.
Group II: placebo gel.
Tea tree oil 5% shampoo. 126 Daily for 4 weeks. In group I, an improvement No adverse side effects were
(Satchell, Saurajen, Bell, & Group I: 5% tea tree oil in whole scalp lesion score, noted.
Barnetson, 2002) shampoo. total area of involvement
Group II: placebo. score, the total severity
score, the itchiness, and
greasiness.
Vitreoscilla filiformis biomass. 60 Once daily for 4 weeks. In group I, a high improve- No adverse side effects were
(Guniche et al., 2008) Group I: 5% LRP-bio- ment of total clinical score noted.
mass lotion (sum of erythema and
Group II: vehicle lotion. scaling subscores) and level
of pruritus.
Zinc pyrithione 1% shampoo. 343 Twice weekly for 4 weeks. In both groups, flakiness Mild pruritus and erythema
(Piérard-Franchimont, Goffin, Group I: 2% keto- improved significantly. In in both groups.
Decroix, & Piérard, 2002) conazole. group I, the overall clearing
Group II: 1% zinc was statistically greater
pyrithione. and there was less clinical
relapse.
Zinc pyrithione (potentiated) 620 Three times weekly for 4 In group I, better adherent No adverse side effects were
shampoo. weeks. scalp flaking severity (ASFS) noted.
(Schwartz, Mizoguchi, & Group 1: potentiated and overall scalp health.
Bacon, 2013) zinc pyrithione sham-
poo
Group II: zinc pyrithi-
one/ climbazole com-
bination
83
Djunaidi
84
FABAD J. Pharm. Sci., 45, 1, 77-89, 2020
noids. It has anti-inflammatory properties, as well as evidence-based recommendations for various alter-
antimicrobial and antifungal activities especially on native modalities. People often choose alternative
Malassezia spp. Yeast (Borda et al., 2019). modalities because of a perceived lower risk of side
effects, and or dissatisfaction with traditional treat-
Solution of urea, lactic acid, and propylene gly-
ments (Farahnik, Sharma, Alban, & Sivamani, 2017).
col (K301)
Since the suggested underlying pathogenic mecha-
This study showed positive results. Propylene gly-
nisms of SD are fungal proliferation and inflammation,
col, lactic acid, and urea have all been shown to in-
the conventional treatments used are topical antifun-
hibit growth of bacteria and or fungi. Therefore when
gal and anti-inflammatory agents such as corticoste-
combined, the ingredients of K301 provide a solution
roid (Borda et al., 2019). Topical antifungals have been
with keratolytic, exfoliating, anti-fungal and hydrat-
used with varying success (Collins & Hivnor, 2012).
ing properties (Emtestam et al., 2012).
In a study comparing antifungal agent ketoconazole
Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment and placebo, the results showed that the people treat-
Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment showed great results ed with the topical antifungal agent achieved complete
against SD. It inhibits calcineurin, a calcium-depen- resolution of SD symptoms compared to those in the
dent phosphatase essential for T-cell activation and placebo group, but the results were statistically het-
proinflammatory cytokine production (Braza et al., erogeneous and could not be explained by subgroup
2003). analyses of dose, mode of delivery nor conflict of in-
terest. Topical ketoconazole showed similar efficacy
Tea tree oil when compared to corticosteroids, but corticosteroids
Tea tree oil (TTO) or Melaleuca alternifolia shows showed a two-fold greater risk of side effects (Okokon,
effective results in reducing SD symptoms. Although Verbeek, Ruotsalainen, Ojo, & Bakhoya, 2015). Corti-
the exact mechanisms of TTO gel in treatment of SD costeroids are effective in the short-term management
is unknown. It may be associated with its antifungal of SD, but they have limited long-term use because
properties, which may be due to its terpenoids con- of the potential for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
tent. It also has anti-inflammatory property (Roy et (HPA) axis suppression. In a case study of patients
al., 2014; Satchell et al., 2002). applying high-potency topical corticosteroids for up
to one year, results showed low cortisol levels and
Vitreoscilla filiformis biomass clinical signs of Cushing syndrome as a result of HPA
Vitreoscilla filiformis is a Gram-negative bacteria axis suppression (Gilbertson, Spellman, Piacquadio,
found in thermal spa water classically used for der- & Mulford, 1998). In a clinical study where the ma-
matological treatment. In this test, the microorgan- jority of the patients applied topical corticosteroid
ism biomass was cultured in a medium prepared with for one week to one month with a regimen of twice
La Roche Posay (LRP) spa water. LRP-biomass was or more per day, skin adverse effects emerged, such
shown effective in improving SD symptoms, probably as: tinea incognito (49.46%), acne (30.27%), cutane-
due to its tolerogenic effect and its ability to modulate ous atrophy (12.97%), rosacea (11.08%), topical ste-
the defensins synthesis that may decrease scalp micro- roid-dependent facies (9.73%), telangiectasia (8.38%),
flora dysregulation (Guniche et al., 2008). hypopigmentation (7.57%), irritant contact dermatitis
(5.68%), striae (4.59%), pyoderma (4.32%), perioral
Zinc pyrithione dermatitis (2.70%), and hypertrichosis (1.35%) (Fu-
As mentioned above, zinc pyrithione has anti-in- rue et al., 2003; Meena et al., 2017)546 children, and
flammatory, antimicrobial, and antifungal properties. 515 adolescents and adults.
Zinc pyrithione is known to have an efficacy against Herbal therapies for SD reviewed in this study in-
M.furfur (Barak-Shinar & Green, 2018). There is also clude herbal shampoo and scalp lotion, honey, Myr-
a potentiated zinc pyrithione shampoo that shows tus communis L. solution, herbal handcream, Quas-
better synergistic effect than normal zinc pyrthione sia amara, tea tree oil, and Vitreoscilla filiformis. For
shampoo during an in-vitro microbiology demonstra- thousands of years, herbal therapies have been used
tion (Schwartz et al., 2013). with great results in treating dermatologic disorders
DISCUSSION in Europe and Asia. However, in the United States and
many other countries herbal products are still con-
Nowadays, more people rely on non-conventional, sidered as dietary supplements, which means there is
alternative modalities to meet their healthcare needs. still no standardisation of active ingredients, purity, or
It is important that physicians remain informed on concentrations (Bedi & Shenefelt, 2002). Therefore,
85
Djunaidi
even though the herbal studies showed favourable reviewed were sponsored by patented brands, which
results in treating SD, learning about and using these may increase the risk of outcome bias. Additionally,
non-conventional treatments remain challenging. some of the studies included had small sample size
or did not have a control group, making it difficult to
In this review, the most highly studied non-herbal
draw specific conclusions about a particular therapy
alternative therapy for SD was calcineurin inhibitors
used.
(pimecrolimus with twelve studies and tacrolimus
with five studies), where all showed positive clini- CONCLUSION
cal improvements. Even so, treatment periods var-
Seborrheic dermatitis remains a challenging dis-
ied largely between existing studies, ranging from 2
ease that may cause significant morbidity. With its
to 16 weeks. For pimecrolimus 1% cream, in a study
still uncertain pathophysiology and etiology, there
comparing different courses to explore an optimal
is a huge room for innovative therapies to emerge.
regimen, results showed that the regimen of 4-week
While traditional therapies may offer immediate relief
twice-daily course may provide longer remission
for many patients, risks of adverse effects may lead to
time and less frequent relapse (Zhao et al., 2018). As
explorations of complementary and alternative treat-
for tacrolimus 0.1% cream, there was a study where
ments. While clinical evidence and quality for these
SD began to recur within 2 weeks after therapy was
treatments are relatively less than that of more con-
completed (Meshkinpour et al., 2003). A twice-weekly
ventional therapy, well-designed trials do exist with
treatment with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment for facial SD
occasional agreements between studies. Undeniably,
seems to provide longer remission time (T. W. Kim et
more rigorous randomized controlled trials are need-
al., 2013).
ed to more accurately determine the safety and effica-
The most common side effects observed in cal- cy of these therapies. For now, it is imperative to know
cineurin inhibitor studies were mild burning sensa- which alternative therapies exist and what potential
tions, erythema, and pruritus. However, the adverse side effects that may occur so better patient counsel-
effect profile of calcineurin inhibitors in terms of cel- ing could be performed.
lular activity and pharmacologic profile were still a lot
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
safer than that of corticosteroids, making it more fa-
vourable for long term use. This is because the T-cell The authors declare no conflict of interest, finan
selectivity of pimecrolimus and tacrolimus contrasts cial or otherwise.
with the multiple targets of corticosteroids, includ-
REFERENCES
ing inflammatory cells, fibroblasts, and keratinocytes.
Due to the lack of effect of calcineurin inhibitors on fi- Al-Waili, N. S. (2001). Therapeutic and prophylactic
broblasts and endothelial cells, there is no risk of skin effects of crude honey on chronic seborrheic der-
atrophy and telangiectasia, as seen with corticosteroid matitis and dandruff. European Journal of Medical
use (Cook & Warshaw, 2009). In a study where sixteen Research, 6(7), 306–308.
healthy individuals applied topical pimecrolimus 1%, Araya, M., Kulthanan, K., & Jiamton, S. (2015). Clini-
betamethasone valerate 0.1%, triamcinolone 0.1%, cal characteristics and quality of life of seborrheic
and a vehicle control; pimecrolimus did not induce dermatitis patients in a tropical country. Indian
epidermal atrophy when applied topically for 4 weeks, Journal of Dermatology, 60(5), 519.
showing it has a low atrophogenic potential (Que-
ille-Roussel et al., 2001) Barak-Shinar, D., Del Río, R., & Green, L. J. (2017).
Treatment of Seborrheic Dermatitis Using a Novel
There are limitations to this review and to the Herbal-based Cream. The Journal of Clinical and
clinical trials included in the review. This review did Aesthetic Dermatology, 10(4), 17–23.
not include unpublished studies in languages oth-
er than English. Another limitation of this review is Barak-Shinar, D., & Green, L. J. (2018). Scalp Seb-
the small amount of studies found for each treatment orrheic Dermatitis and Dandruff Therapy Using
modality, often only one study was found, which can a Herbal and Zinc Pyrithione-based Therapy of
reduce the chance of cross referencing and finding Shampoo and Scalp Lotion. The Journal of Clinical
meaningful correlation between studies if one exists. and Aesthetic Dermatology, 11(1), 26–31.
Given the lack of standardised outcome measure for Bedi, M. K., & Shenefelt, P. D. (2002). Herbal therapy
SD, there were many trials that used a different sub- in dermatology. Archives of Dermatology, Vol. 138,
jective outcome measures, making it difficult to make 232–242.
comparisons across these studies. Some of the studies
86
FABAD J. Pharm. Sci., 45, 1, 77-89, 2020
Berk, T., & Scheinfeld, N. (2010). Seborrheic Derma- Dreno, B., Chosidow, O., Revuz, J., Moyse, D., (2003).
titis. P & T : A Peer-Reviewed Journal for Managed Lithium gluconate 8% vs ketoconazole 2% in the
Care and Hospital Formulary Management, 35(6), treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis: a multicentre,
348–352. randomized study. The British Journal of Derma-
Borda, L. J., Perper, M., & Keri, J. E. (2019). Treatment tology, 148(6), 1230–1236.
of seborrheic dermatitis: a comprehensive review. Dreno, B., & Moyse, D. (2002). Lithium gluconate in
Journal of Dermatological Treatment, Vol. 30, 158– the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis: a mul-
169. ticenter, randomised, double-blind study versus
Braza, T. J., Dicarlo, J. B., Soon, S. L., & Mccall, C. O. placebo. European Journal of Dermatology : EJD,
(2003). Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment for seborrhoeic 12(6), 549–552.
dermatitis: An open-label pilot study. British Jour- Emtestam, L., Svensson, Å., & Rensfeldt, K. (2012). Treat-
nal of Dermatology, 148(6), 1242–1244. ment of seborrhoeic dermatitis of the scalp with a
Chaijan, M. R., Handjani, F., Zarshenas, M., Ra- topical solution of urea, lactic acid, and propylene gly-
himabadi, M. S., & Tavakkoli, A. (2018). The myr- col (K301): results of two double-blind, randomised,
tus communis L. solution versus ketoconazole placebo-controlled studies. Mycoses, 55(5), 393–403.
shampoo in treatment of dandruff: A double blind- Fabbrocini, G., Cantelli, M., & Monfrecola, G. (2014).
ed randomized clinical trial. JPMA. The Journal of Topical nicotinamide for seborrheic dermatitis:
the Pakistan Medical Association, 68(5), 715–720. An open randomized study. Journal of Dermato-
Collins, C. D., & Hivnor, C. (2012). Seborrheic Derma- logical Treatment, 25(3), 241–245.
titis. In L. A. Goldsmith, S. I. Katz, B. A. Gilchrest,
Farahnik, B., Sharma, D., Alban, J., & Sivamani, R. K.
A. S. Paller, D. J. Leffell, & K. Wolff (Eds.), Fitzpat-
(2017). Topical Botanical Agents for the Treatment
rick Dermatology In General Medicine (8th ed., p.
of Psoriasis: A Systematic Review. American Jour-
259). New York: McGraw Hill.
nal of Clinical Dermatology, Vol. 18, 451–468.
Cook, B. A., & Warshaw, E. M. (2009). Role of topi-
cal calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of seb- Firooz, A., Solhpour, A., Gorouhi, F., Daneshpazhooh,
orrheic dermatitis: A review of pathophysiology, M., Balighi, K., Farsinejad, K., … Dowlati, Y. (2006).
safety, and efficacy. American Journal of Clinical Pimecrolimus cream, 1%, vs hydrocortisone acetate
Dermatology, Vol. 10, 103–118. cream, 1%, in the treatment of facial seborrheic der-
matitis: A randomized, investigator-blind, clinical
Coondoo, A., Phiske, M., Verma, S., & Lahiri, K. trial. Archives of Dermatology, 142(8), 1066–1067.
(2014). Side-effects of topical steroids: A long
overdue revisit. Indian Dermatology Online Jour- Furue, M., Terao, H., Rikihisa, W., Urabe, K., Kinu-
nal, 5(4), 416. kawa, N., Nose, Y., & Koga, T. (2003). Clinical
dose and adverse effects of topical steroids in daily
de Moraes, A. P., De Arruda, É. Â. G., Vitoriano, M. management of atopic dermatitis. British Journal
A. V., de Moraes Filho, M. O., Bezerra, F. Â. F., de of Dermatology, 148(1), 128–133.
Magalhães Holanda, E., & de Moraes Filho, M. O.
(2007). An open-label efficacy pilot study with pi- Geißler, S. E., Michelsen, S., & Plewig, G. (2003). Very
mecrolimus cream 1% in adults with facial sebor- low dose isotretinoin is effective in controlling
rhoeic dermatitis infected with HIV. Journal of the seborrhea. JDDG - Journal of the German Society
European Academy of Dermatology and Venereolo- of Dermatology, 1(12), 952–958.
gy, 21(5), 596–601. Gilbertson, E. O., Spellman, M. C., Piacquadio, D. J., &
de Souza Leão Kamamoto, C., Sanudo, A., Hassun, K. Mulford, M. I. (1998). Super potent topical corti-
M., & Bagatin, E. (2017). Low-dose oral isotreti- costeroid use associated with adrenal suppression:
noin for moderate to severe seborrhea and seb- Clinical considerations. Journal of the American
orrheic dermatitis: a randomized comparative Academy of Dermatology, 38(2), 318–321.
trial. International Journal of Dermatology, 56(1),
Goldust, M., Rezaee, E., & Raghifar, R. (2013). Treat-
80–85.
ment of seborrheic dermatitis: Comparison of
del Rosso, J. Q. (2011). Adult seborrheic dermatitis: sertaconazole 2 % cream versus pimecrolimus 1
A status report on practical topical management. % cream. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 182(4),
Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, Vol. 703–706.
4, 32–38.
87
Djunaidi
Goldust, Mohamad, Rezaee, E., & Raghifar, R. (2013). Meshkinpour, A., Sun, J., & Weinstein, G. (2003). An
A double blind study of the effectiveness of sert- open pilot study using tacrolimus ointment in the
aconazole 2% cream vs. metronidazole 1% gel in treatment of seborrheic dermatitis. Journal of the
the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis. Annals of American Academy of Dermatology, 49(1), 145–
Parasitology, 59(4), 173–177. 147.
Goldust, Mohamad, Rezaee, E., Raghifar, R., & He- Okokon, E. O., Verbeek, J. H., Ruotsalainen, J. H., Ojo,
mayat, S. (2013). Treatment of seborrheic derma- O. A., & Bakhoya, V. N. (2015). Topical antifungals
titis: the efficiency of sertaconazole 2% cream vs. for seborrhoeic dermatitis. Cochrane Database of
tacrolimus 0.03% cream. Annals of Parasitology, Systematic Reviews, Apr 29(4), CD008138.
59(2), 73–77.
Ozcan, H., Seyhan, M., & Yologlu, S. (2007). Is met-
Guniche, A., Cathelineau, A.-C., Bastien, P., Esdaile, J., ronidazole 0.75% gel effective in the treatment of
Martin, R., Queille Roussel, C., & Breton, L. (2008). seborrhoeic dermatitis? A double-blind, placebo
Vitreoscilla filiformis biomass improves seborrheic controlled study. European Journal of Dermatolo-
dermatitis. Journal of the European Academy of gy, 17(4), 313–316.
Dermatology and Venereology, 22(8), 1014–1015.
Ozden, M. G., Tekin, N. S., Lter, N., & Ankarali, H.
High, W. A., & Pandya, A. G. (2006). Pilot trial of 1% (2010). Topical pimecrolimus 1 cream for resistant
pimecrolimus cream in the treatment of sebor- seborrheic dermatitis of the face: An open-label
rheic dermatitis in African American adults with study. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology,
associated hypopigmentation. Journal of the Amer- 11(1), 51–54.
ican Academy of Dermatology, 54(6), 1083–1088.
Papp, K. A., Papp, A., Dahmer, B., & Clark, C. S. (2012).
Kim, B. S., Kim, S. H., Kim, M. B., Oh, C. K., Jang, H.
Single-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluat-
S., & Kwon, K. S. (2007). Treatment of facial seb-
ing the treatment of facial seborrheic dermatitis
orrheic dermatitis with pimecrolimus cream 1%:
with hydrocortisone 1% ointment compared with
An open-label clinical study in Korean patients.
tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in adults. Journal of the
Journal of Korean Medical Science, 22(5), 868–872.
American Academy of Dermatology, 67(1), e11-5.
Kim, T. W., Mun, J. H., Jwa, S., Song, M., Kim, H. S.,
Ko, H. C., … Kim, B. S. (2013). Proactive Treat- Piérard-Franchimont, C., Goffin, V., Decroix, J., &
ment of Adult Facial Seborrhoeic Dermatitis with Piérard, G. E. (2002). A multicenter randomized
0.1% Tacrolimus Ointment: Randomized, Dou- trial of ketoconazole 2% and zinc pyrithione 1%
ble-blind, Vehicle-controlled, Multi-centre Trial. shampoos in severe dandruff and seborrheic der-
Acta Dermato Venereologica, 93(5), 557–561. matitis. Skin Pharmacology and Applied Skin Phys-
iology, 15(6), 434–441.
Koc, E., Arca, E., Kose, O., & Akar, A. (2009). An open,
randomized, prospective, comparative study of topi- Pirkhammer, D., Seeber, A., Hönigsmann, H., & Tan-
cal pimecrolimus 1% cream and topical ketoconazole ew, A. (2000). Narrow-band ultraviolet B (TL-01)
2% cream in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis. phototherapy is an effective and safe treatment
Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 20(1), 4–9. option for patients with severe seborrhoeic der-
matitis. British Journal of Dermatology, 143(5),
Koca, R., Altinyazar, H. C., & Eştürk, E. (2003). Is top- 964–968.
ical metronidazole effective in seborrheic dermati-
tis? A double-blind study. International Journal of Queille-Roussel, C., Paul, C., Duteil, L., Lefebvre, M.
Dermatology, 42(8), 632–635. C., Rapatz, G., Zagula, M., & Ortonne, J. P. (2001).
The new topical ascomycin derivative SDZ ASM
Leyden, J. J., Del Rosso, J. Q., & Baum, E. W. (2014). 981 does not induce skin atrophy when applied
The use of isotretinoin in the treatment of acne to normal skin for 4 weeks: A randomized, dou-
vulgaris clinical considerations and future direc- ble-blind controlled study. British Journal of Der-
tions. Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatolo- matology, 144(3), 507–513.
gy, 7(2), 3–S21.
Rallis, E., Nasiopoulou, A., Kouskoukis, C., & Kouma-
Meena, S., Gupta, L. K., Khare, A. K., Balai, M., Mittal,
ntaki, E. (2004). Pimecrolimus cream 1% can be
A., Mehta, S., & Bhatri, G. (2017). Topical cortico-
an effective treatment for seborrheic dermatitis of
steroids abuse: A clinical study of cutaneous adverse
the face and trunk. Drugs under Experimental and
effects. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 62(6), 567.
Clinical Research, 30(5–6), 191–195.
88
FABAD J. Pharm. Sci., 45, 1, 77-89, 2020
Rigopoulos, D., Ioannides, D., Kalogeromitros, D., Siadat, A., Iraji, F., Shahmoradi, Z., Enshaieh, S., & Ta-
Gregoriou, S., & Katsambas, A. (2004). Pimecroli- heri, A. (2006). The efficacy of 1% metronidazole
mus cream 1% vs. betamethasone 17-valerate 0.1% gel in facial seborrheic dermatitis: A double blind
cream in the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis. study. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology
A randomized open-label clinical trial. British and Leprology, 72(4), 266.
Journal of Dermatology, 151(5), 1071–1075.
Smith, S. A., Baker, A. E., & Williams, J. H. (2002).
Roy, A. B., Tavakolifar, B., Huseini, H. F., Tousi, P., Effective treatment of seborrheic dermatitis using
Shafigh, N., & Rahimzadeh, M. (2014). Effica- a low dose, oral homeopathic medication consist-
cy of Melaleuca alternifolia Essential Oil in the ing of potassium bromide, sodium bromide, nick-
Treatment of Facial Seborrheic Dermatitis: A el sulfate, and sodium chloride in a double-blind,
Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled placebo-controlled study. Alternative Medicine
Clinical Trial. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 13(51), Review : A Journal of Clinical Therapeutic, 7(1),
26–32. 59–67.
Sampaio, A. L. S. B., Mameri, A. C. A., Vargas, T. J. de Tatlican, S., Eren, C., & Eskioglu, F. (2009). Insight
S., Ramos-e-Silva, M., Nunes, A. P., & Carneiro, S. into pimecrolimus experience in seborrheic der-
C. da S. (2011). Seborrheic dermatitis. Anais Bra- matitis: Close follow-up with exact mean cure and
sileiros de Dermatologia, 86(6), 1061–1071; quiz remission times and side-effect profile. Journal of
1072–1074. Dermatological Treatment, 20(4), 198–202.
Satchell, A. C., Saurajen, A., Bell, C., & Barnetson, R. Warshaw, E. M., Wohlhuter, R. J., Liu, A., Zeller, S.
S. C. (2002). Treatment of dandruff with 5% tea A., Wenner, R. A., Bowers, S., … Parneix-Spake,
tree oil shampoo. Journal of the American Acade- A. (2007). Results of a randomized, double-blind,
my of Dermatology, 47(6), 852–855. vehicle-controlled efficacy trial of pimecrolimus
cream 1% for the treatment of moderate to severe
Schwartz, J., Mizoguchi, H., & Bacon, R. (2013). Com- facial seborrheic dermatitis. Journal of the Ameri-
parative evaluation of antidandruff clinical effica- can Academy of Dermatology, 57(2), 257–264.
cy of a potentiated zinc pyrithione shampoo and a
zinc pyrithione/climbazole combination formula. Zhao, J., Sun, W., Zhang, C., Wu, J., Le, Y., Huang, C.,
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, … Xiang, L. (2018). Comparison of different regi-
68(4), AB46. mens of pimecrolimus 1% cream in the treatment
of facial seborrheic dermatitis. Journal of Cosmetic
Seite, S., Rougier, A., & Talarico, S. (2009). Random- Dermatology, 17(1), 90–94.
ized study comparing the efficacy and tolerance
of a lipohydroxy acid shampoo to a ciclopiroxol-
amine shampoo in the treatment of scalp sebor-
rheic dermatitis. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology,
8(4), 249–253.
89