Practical Advanced Periodontal Surgery 2020
Practical Advanced Periodontal Surgery 2020
Edited by
Serge Dibart, DMD
Professor and Chair
Department of Periodontology
Director Advanced Specialty Program in Periodontics
Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine
Boston, MA, USA
This edition first published 2020
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Edition History
Blackwell Munksgaard (1e, 2007)
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain
permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Serge Dibart to be identified as the author of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Office(s)
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Boschstr. 12, 69469 Weinheim, Germany
John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte. Ltd, 1 Fusionopolis Walk, #07‐01 Solaris South Tower, Singapore 138628
Editorial Office
111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that appears in standard print
versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Ziedonis (Zie) Skobe, PhD
vii
9. Dental Implant Placement Including Squamous Cell Carcinoma 150
the Use of Short Implants 121 Verrucous Carcinoma 151
Albert Price and Ming Fang Su Metastatic Disease 151
History 121 Infections 152
Indications 123 Herpes 152
Surgical Technique 123 HIV‐Associated Gingivitis 152
Implant Placement 125 Oral Soft Tissue Biopsy Techniques 153
Site Preparation 125 Armamentarium 153
The Fixture (Implant) Installation 130 Incisional Scalpel Biopsy 153
Possible Problems and Complications 130 Excisional Scalpel Biopsy 154
Biopsy Data Sheet 154
10. Periodontal Medicine Including Biopsy
Techniques 137 11. Sinus Augmentation Using
Vikki Noonan and Sadru Kabani Tissue‐Engineered Bone 159
Gingival Nodules 137 Ulrike Schulze‐Späte, Luigi Montesani,
Parulis 137 and Lorenzo Montesani
Fibroma 137 History 159
Peripheral Ossifying Fibroma 137 Indications 159
Pyogenic Granuloma 138 Contraindications 160
Peripheral Giant Cell Granuloma 138 Armamentarium 160
Diagnosis and Treatment of Reactive Gingival Sinus Augmentation Using Tissue-Engineered
Nodules 139 Bone Discs 160
Gingival Cyst of the Adult 139 Transplant Implantation Surgery (Sinus
Mucocele 139 Augmentation Procedure Using Tissue-
Desquamative Gingivitis 140 Engineered Bone Discs) 161
Lichen Planus 140 Sinus Lift Using Autogenous Mesenchymal Cells
Pemphigus Vulgaris 141 Processed Chairside 165
Mucous Membrane (Cicatricial)
Pemphigoid 141 12. Extraction Site Management in the Esthetic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Desquamative Zone: Hard and Soft Tissue Reconstruction 169
Gingival Lesions 142 Sherif Said
Plasma Cell Gingivitis 142 Introduction 169
Erythema Multiforme 143 The Influence of Tissue Volume on
Gingival Enlargement 144 the Peri‐Implant “Pink” Esthetics 169
Epulis Fissuratum 144 Tissue Volume Availability and
Medication‐Induced Gingival Overgrowth 144 Requirements 169
Hyperplastic Gingivitis 144 Pre‐Operative Implant Site
Leukemia 145 Assessment 172
Gingival Fibromatosis 145 Tissue Augmentation at the Time of Tooth
Ligneous Gingivitis and Conjunctivitis 145 Extraction 175
Wegener’s Granulomatosis 146 Management of Class I Sockets 177
Pigmented Lesions 146 Armamentarium 177
Physiologic Pigmentation 146 Three‐Dimensional Implant
Medication‐Induced Pigmentation 146 Positioning 179
Smoker’s Melanosis 147 Selection of the Bone Graft Material 180
Amalgam Tattoo 147 Rationale 181
Melanotic Macule 148 Socket Seal 183
Oral Melanoacanthoma (Melanoacanthosis) 148 Autogenous Tissue for Concomitant Buccal
Oral Melanocytic Nevus 148 Volume Augmentation and Socket Seal
Oral Melanoma 149 Procedures 186
Sanguinaria‐Induced Leukoplakia 149 Sub‐Epithelial Connective Tissue Graft 186
Proliferative Verrucous Leukoplakia 149 Compromised Sockets 192
Malignant Neoplasia 150 Flapless Ridge Preservation 192
viii Contents
Ridge Preservation Utilizing 13. Digital Technologies in Clinical Restorative
Barrier Membranes 193 Dentistry 213
Esthetic Ridge Augmentation 194 Vygandas Rutkū nas, Rokas Borusevičius,
Open Flap Approach for Extraction Site Agnė Geč iauskaite,̇ and Justinas Pletkus
Management 197 From Conventional to Digital Technologies 213
Site Analysis and Classification 197 Digital Solutions for Planning and Manufacturing
Surgical Phase 198 of Teeth‐Supported Restorations 214
Suturing of the Graft 203 Digital Solutions for Planning and Manufacturing
Stabilization of the Graft 205 of Implant‐Supported Restorations 223
Closure 205 Future Perspectives 227
Managing Implant Tissue Deficiencies 206
Conclusion 210 Index 233
Contents ix
List of Contributors
xi
Vygandas Rutkūnas, DDS, PhD Peyman Shahidi, DDS, MScD
Associate Professor Practice Limited to Periodontology and
Division of Prosthodontics, Institute of Odontology Implant Dentistry
Faculty of Medicine Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
ProDentum Clinic, Vilnius, Lithuania Ming Fang Su, DMD, MS
Clinical Professor
Sherif Said, DDS, MSD Department of Periodontology and Oral Biology
Clinical Assistant Professor Boston University School of Dental Medicine
Department of Periodontology Boston, MA, USA
Boston University School of Dental Medicine
Boston, MA, USA Yun Po Zhang, PhD, DDS(hon)
Director
Ulrike Schulze‐Späte, DMD, PhD Clinical Dental Research
Diplomate, American Board of Periodontology Colgate‐Palmolive Company
Director, Section of Geriodontics Piscataway, NJ, USA
Department of Conservative Dentistry
and Periodontology
Center of Dental Medicine
University Hospital Jena
Jena, Germany
I would like to thank my colleagues and students of Boston I would also like to thank Ms. Samantha Rose Burke for her
University Henry M. School of Dental Medicine for their invaluable help in formatting this manuscript, Mary Malin
invaluable help. I would also like to thank Ms. Leila Joy for copyediting and to the team at Wiley for bringing the
Rosenthal for drawing Figures 7.32 and 7.33, Dr. Alessia book to Production.
De Vit Dr. Trevor Fujinaka for the video on Piezocision and
Dr. Galip Gurel.
xiii
About the Companion Website
www.wiley.com/go/dibart/advanced
xv
Introduction
Thomas Van Dyke
As reflected in this Second Edition, the surgical techniques IV sedation by Dr. Jess Liu, Digital Technologies in Clinical
that span the scope of dentistry have continued to evolve. Restorative Dentistry by Dr. Vygandas Rutkūnas and
Predictable implant placement and bone augmentation colleagues, and Extraction Site Management in the
techniques have become a common part of the repertoire of Esthetic Zone: Hard and Soft Tissue Reconstruction by
the periodontist. Importantly, these technical developments Dr. Sherif Said. The final five chapters of the book are
and the research on which they are based have impacted devoted to exploring the specialized needs of complex
other specialties, including orthodontics, endodontics, oral cases. The problems of inadequate vertical bone height
and maxillofacial surgery, and prosthodontics. and soft tissue defects can now be predictably addressed
in most cases. In particular, the esthetic issues of lack of
In Practical Advanced Periodontal Surgery, Second papillary redevelopment between adjacent implants are
Edition, Dr. Serge Dibart has updated, expanded, and addressed by established investigators in the field.
improved on the landmark First Edition with a team of Distraction osteogenesis and papilla regeneration tech
experts who have played a major role in the development niques now provide a means to enhance the esthetics of
of these concepts, in some cases, and their implementa the most complicated cases.
tion, in all cases. It is arranged into 13 chapters that range
from a review of the science leading up to new technolo Periodontal medicine has its roots in oral pathology/oral
gies to their implementation and the evidence backing medicine. The forefathers of periodontics, physicians such
their veracity. The contribution of periodontal concepts to as Gottlieb, Orban, and Goldman, were oral pathologists
orthodontics and endodontics is just an example of how first. No book of advanced periodontal techniques would
modern periodontology adds to the armamentarium of all be complete without a review of the most common oral
aspects of the dental profession. lesions that face the periodontist and their treatment, along
with proper biopsy techniques.
The focus of this book is bone – the biology of bone and
how an understanding of the basic principles of biology The look to the future has also changed between the First
can be used to enhance treatment. The book begins with and Second Editions. The future of periodontology is
a review of bone biology and current understanding of bright; we are provided an exciting glimpse of what is next.
wound healing. The discovery that surgically injured bone
becomes rapidly osteopenic followed by increased turn Dr. Dibart has again brought together the subject, the
over has been updated to include new clinical techniques team, and the expertise to produce a most valuable com
for rapid tooth movement through Piezocision. pilation of advanced techniques of modern periodontics.
The content is based in science and is well‐balanced, pro
Notably, there are three new chapters in the Second viding a reference work and guide for the practitioner of
Edition. The topics are vital to modern practice, including advanced dentistry.
1
Chapter 1 Conscious IV Sedation Utilizing Midazolam
Jess Liu
Conscious sedation can be achieved by different routes of It is important to understand that the use of midazolam is
administration such as enteral or parenteral administration. to produce conscious sedative effects and does not
For the purpose of this chapter, parenteral administration replace the need for proper local anesthesia. Therefore
of conscious sedation limited to intravenous administration proper anesthetic should be administered prior to the
of Midazolam (Versed) will be reviewed. starting of the dental procedure.
3
Table 1.1 Continuum of sedation: definition and levels (2004).
Responsiveness Normal response to Purposefula response to verbal Purposefula response following Unarousable even with painful
verbal stimulation stimulation repeated or painful stimulation stimulus
Airway Unaffected No intervention required Intervention may be required Intervention often required
Spontaneous Unaffected Adequate May be inadequate Frequently inadequate
Ventilation
Cardiovascular Unaffected Usually maintained Usually maintained May be impaired
Function
Table 1.2 ASA physical status classification (American Society of Anesthesiologists 2015).
ASA physical status classification system
ASA Physical Status 1 A normal healthy patient
ASA Physical Status 2 A patient with mild systemic disease
ASA Physical Status 3 A patient with severe systemic disease
ASA Physical Status 4 A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life
ASA Physical Status 5 A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation
ASA Physical Status 6 A declared brain‐dead patient whose organs are being removed for donor purposes
Figure 1.3 Saline bag used for IV sedation. ◦◦ Dosage and administration indicated for the intrave-
nous administration of midazolam as provided by
pharmaceutical company Hospira Inc. is as follows:
▪▪ Methods of venous distension to facilitate
venepuncture. ▪▪ Healthy Adults Below the Age of 60: Titrate slowly to
the desired effect (e.g. the initiation of slurred
• Application of tourniquet 3–4 in. above collection
speech). Some patients may respond to as little as
area with appropriate compression
1 mg. No more than 2.5 mg should be given over a
• Opening and closing of hand period of at least two minutes. Wait an additional two
or more minutes to fully evaluate the sedative effect.
• Hanging of the arm below heart
If further titration is necessary, continue to titrate,
• Light slapping or rubbing of the area with alcohol using small increments, to the appropriate level of
wipe sedation. Wait an additional two or more minutes
after each increment to fully evaluate the sedative
◦◦ Select appropriate Introcan Safety I.V. Catheter (22/24
effect. A total dose greater than 5 mg is not usually
gauge is recommended). See Figures 1.4 and 1.5.
necessary to reach the desired endpoint.
◦◦ Disinfect selected area of venepuncture with 70% iso-
▪▪ Patients Age 60 or Older, and Debilitated or
propyl alcohol wipe
Chronically Ill Patients: Because the danger of
◦◦ Insertion of needle and observe for blood return in the hypoventilation, airway obstruction, or apnea is
flashback chamber greater in elderly patients and those with chronic
disease states or decreased pulmonary reserve,
▪▪ Caution: At no time should venepuncture be per-
and because the peak effect may take longer in
formed on an artery
these patients, increments should be smaller and
◦◦ Remove tourniquet the rate of injection slower. Titrate slowly to the
◦◦ Attach infusion set to catheter adaptor desired effect (e.g. the initiation of slurred speech).
Some patients may respond to as little as 1 mg. No
◦◦ Start IV drip, constant drip should be observed. See more than 1.5 mg should be given over a period of
Figure 1.6. no less than two minutes. Wait an additional two or
• Laryngospasm
• Bronchospasm
• Airway Obstruction
Figure 1.8 Use the 1 ml Insulin Syringe to draw up 1 ml of 5 mg/ml
midazolam. • Aspiration
• Angina Pectoris
Place sterile gauze over site of venepuncture and
apply firm pressure for three to five minutes to prevent • Myocardial Infarction
hematoma. • Hypotension
• Escort patient to recovery room and continue to monitor • Hypertension
patient’s vital signs, once recovered release patient to
escort. • Phlebitis
• Intra‐Arterial Injection
Post‐operative instructions:
• Syncope
a. No sedatives 12 hours after procedure.
• Hyperventilation
b. No consumption of alcoholic beverages after procedure.
• Seizures
c. No stairs without assistance or heavy lifting until com-
pletely recovered. • Severe Allergic Reaction
11
Bone Remodeling • Calcitonin (CT)
5. Formation: Laying down of bone; osteoblasts produce Markers of bone formation measure osteoblastic activity:
osteoid; mineralization begins; then bone is again con- osteocalcin, P1NP (N‐terminal propeptide of type 1 procol-
verted to a resting surface lagen), and bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP).
Genetic polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) Low‐Density Lipoprotein Receptor–Related Proteins
gene are associated with parameters of bone homeostasis
Recent analyses revealed a new signaling pathway involved
and with osteoporosis and rapid bone resorption.
in the regulation of osteoblastic cells and the acquisition of
Interestingly, some authors have found VDR polymorphism
peak bone mass. Wnts are soluble glycoproteins that
to be associated with localized aggressive periodontal
engage receptor complexes composed of low‐density lipo-
disease (Hennig et al. 1999).
protein receptor–related proteins Lrp 5 and 6 and Frizzled
proteins. The loss of function of Lrp 5 causes a decrease in
Childhood vitamin D deficiency syndrome is called rickets:
bone formation, and Lrp 5 mutations are associated with
unmineralized osteoid accumulates, and the bone formed is
high bone mass diseases. These mutations influence the
weak and can lead to permanent deformities of the skele-
Wnt‐beta‐catenin canonical pathway that increases bone
ton. In adulthood, the absence of adequate amounts of vita-
mass through a large number of mechanisms.
min D leads to osteomalacia: decalcification of bone occurs
by defective mineralization of newly formed bone matrix.
Osteoporosis
What are the sources of vitamin D? Only a few foods Osteoporosis means “porous bone.” Calcium deficiency
contain appreciable amounts of vitamin D – fish liver, fish leads to decalcification of bones and aggravated fracture
(i.e. salmon, mackerel, tuna, sardines), eggs, liver, butter, risks (especially vertebrae, hip, and forearm).
and Shiitake mushrooms. Hyperparathyroidism can also cause decalcification.
Androgens and estrogens (especially before menopause),
Vitamin K on the other hand, stimulate bone formation.
This vitamin is required for the production of osteocalcin
Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and micro-
(a protein produced by the osteoblasts); a good vitamin K
architectural deterioration due to decreased bone formation
status is necessary to prevent osteoporosis. Vitamin K is
and increased bone resorption; this phenomenon leads to
found in green leafy vegetables.
increased bone fragility and fracture. As we age, bone
resorption exceeds bone formation and the severe loss of
Calcitonin
bone mass results in gaps in the bone structure, leading to
This is a hormone secreted by the thyroid gland. Its effects fractures (hip, spine, and wrist being the most common).
are opposite those of the PTH (lowering of blood calcium).
Calcitonin inhibits matrix resorption by inhibiting osteoclast Bone strength is also determined by another important
activity; it reverses hypercalcemia. element, which is the trabecular microstructure. In estrogen
• Prevalent radiographic vertebral fracture This technique offers a significant advantage because of
its three‐dimensional capability for osseous defects detec-
tion (Misch et al. 2006).
BONE DENSITY MEASURING TECHNIQUES
DEXA: Dual Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry Fractal Analysis of Bone Texture
(Bone Densitometry)
The analysis of bone texture based on fractal mathemat-
In DEXA, an x‐ray with two energy peaks is sent through ics when applied to bone images on plain radiographs
the bones. One is absorbed by the soft tissues, and the can be considered as a reflection of trabecular bone
other is absorbed by the bones; through subtraction, BMD microarchitecture.
Oates, T.W., Caraway, D., and Jones, J. (2004). Relation between Woo, S.B., Hellstein, J.W., and Kalmar, J.R. (2006). Narrative [cor-
smoking and biomarkers of bone resorption associated with dental rected] review: bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaws.
endosseous implants. Implant. Dent. 13 (4): 352–357. Ann. Intern. Med. 144 (10): 753–761.
ANATOMIC REVIEW (EMPHASIS The Lingual branch of the external carotid ascends from its
ON VASCULAR SUPPLY) medial aspect, below the corner of the mandible to supply
the tongue and ends in a plexus with the submental branch
Knowledge of local anatomy and the physiology of
of the Facial Artery and the terminus of the Mylohyoid
healing tissues is the sine qua non of the surgeon’s
artery. This plexus, located to the lingual of the cuspid and
ability to achieve stable results. A practical review of
lower incisor teeth, serves parts of the sublingual gland
regional and periodontal anatomy at both the macro and
and provides branches into the lingual foramina to supply
micro levels can be applied to a better performance of
the lingual bone mass of the chin. Injury to this area by
both periodontal and implant surgical procedures.
perforating through the lingual bone plate during a mis-
Following this anatomy review, the basic process, timing
placed or overextended trajectory of dental implant prepa-
and current knowledge of wound healing will be
ration may have fatal repercussions (Bernardi et al. 2017).
reviewed. Throughout this exploration a few underlying
themes are repeated:
The facial artery branches from the carotid just above the
Iingual artery passing inward beneath the mandibular
1. Understanding the local anatomy of microvascular pat-
angle, then courses forward through parts of the subman-
terns and local preservation of them is the key to mini-
dibular gland after which it curves outward to the facial
mal morbidity. Soft tissue flaps, designed for surgical
tissues just in front of the masseter muscle (where its pulse
access, without this understanding can lead to soft tis-
can be felt with light palpation of the area). From its lingual
sue necrosis and subsequent underlying bone loss or
aspect a small submental branch courses medial to join
sequestration.
the complex with the lingual and mylohyoid arteries previ-
2. The relative physical dimensions and nutrient demands ously noted. The main branch supplies tissues of the face
of the parenchymal and stromal content determine and lips.
blood vessel volume and its distribution
The maxillary artery branches inward off the external
3. Constant attention to these variations in anatomic
carotid just below the mandibular condyle. The tributaries
microarchitecture allows predictable, biologic manipu-
of the maxillary artery provide the major supplies to the
lation which minimizes risk in surgical procedures.
interior of the facial region. Its regional divisions are three
in number: the inferior alveolar (supplying the mandible),
VASCULAR SUPPLY: MACRO AND MICRO
the pterygoid (which supplies the major masticatory mus-
The external carotid is the major source of arterial supply cles) and the pterygopalatine (which contains the major
to the facial structures. After separating from the common supply to the maxillary arch – the posterior superior alveo-
carotid at about the level of the thyroid cartilage, the exter- lar) (Woodburne 1965) (Figure 3.1).
nal carotid provides a branch to the superior thyroid and
then ascends into the facial structures with major branches 1. The inferior alveolar artery: After providing a small,
in succession being the ascending phayrngeal, lingual, descending mylohyoid branch to the medial, the infe-
facial, occipital, posterior auricular, and the maxillary artery rior alveolar artery descends to enter the mandibular
before distributing into a variety of superficial temporal foramen and distributes internally to the ramus and
arteries. Our interests will be focused on the lingual, facial, body of the mandibular bone, to the posterior teeth, and
and maxillary branches. the periodontal ligaments (PDL) before branching
19
Infraorbital a.
Posterior superior alveolar a.
Sphenopalatine a.
Descending palatine a.
Anterior deep temporal a.
Buccal a.
Posterior deep temporal a.
Med a lot pterygoid ms & os
Masseter a.
Access meningeal a.
Mid meningeal a.
Ant tympanic a.
Deep auricular a.
Maxillary a.
Super-
ficial
temporal a.
Post auricular a.
Ext carotid a.
Occipital a.
Inf alveolar a.
Facial a.
Mylohyoid a.
Mental a.
Figure 3.1 Distribution of the maxillary artery. Source: From Woodburne (1965).
below the mandibular bicuspid area in an upward, gingival margins through the PDL, and (in combina-
reverse curl, to exit through the mental foramen with the tion with the infraorbital and sphenopalatine) the tis-
mental nerve. The remainder of the inferior alveolar sues of the maxillary sinus (Solar 1999).
artery continues forward (although there is no clear
b. The descending palatine exits through the greater
description of its passage forward) to supply the ante-
palatine foramen apical to the maxillary 2nd molar
rior teeth and a major portion of the chin. A discrete
and courses forward along the inner surface of the
bony canal associated with this incisive branch is sel-
palatal vault (Figure 3.2), supplying glands and
dom seen on a CT Scan. (As noted above the lingual
mucosa before reaching the incisive canal. There it
aspect of the chin bone is also supplied through the
anastomoses with the incisive branch of the spheno-
lingual foramina from the lingual, mylohyoid, and facial
palatine artery.
submental plexus.)
c. The infraorbital passes slightly higher and medial
2. The pterygoid division supplies the major masticatory
through the floor of the orbit with terminal branches
muscles and the buccinator muscle of the cheek and
to the mid and anterior incisive areas, combines with
has secondary branches which complement the facial
branches of the posterior superior to supply the
artery in supplying the cheek mucosa and skin.
maxillary sinus (Solar 1999), and the lacrimal duct
3. The pterygopalatine division courses through the ptery- and then exits through the infraorbital notch to the
gopalatine fossa and sends four major branches: pos- soft tissues of the face under the eye.
terior superior alveolar, descending palatine, infraorbital,
d. The sphenopalatine artery ascends higher to the
and sphenopalatine.
roof of the nose and then distributes forward and
a. The posterior superior alveolar enters the distal of down along the lateral nasal wall (common with the
the maxillary tuberosity and coursing forward medial wall of maxillary sinus) and medially along
supplies the basal and alveolar bone, the teeth, the the vomer groove to the incisive canal, within which
MICROARCHITECTURE OF THE BONE/TOOTH
BLOOD SUPPLY WITHIN THE ALVEOLAR
RELATIONSHIP AND THE INTERFACE
AND BASAL BONE OF THE DENTAL
OF SOFT AND HARD CONNECTIVE TISSUES
ARCHES
Bone has two compartments: a hard mineralized compo-
The general pattern or trajectory of blood flow to both hard
nent and a soft, stroma filled inner marrow space. These
and soft tissues of the maxillofacial area is from distal to
two compartments are arranged in a variety of shapes and
mesial (posterior–anterior). The trabecular bone compart-
proportions – the local bony microarchitecture. The thick
ment of the basal and alveolar bone is supplied from within
mineralized layers that define the bone’s outer shape or
their defining cortical plates (i.e. from inside out) by their
line the major nerve/vessel channels (inferior alveolar
major vessels, the posterior superior alveolar and the infe-
canal, incisive canal, etc.) and tooth sockets (Figures 3.6
rior alveolar. If teeth are present, they are surrounded by a
and 3.7) are referred to as cortical or compact bone. The
compact woven bone socket that has numerous perfora-
inner compartment or marrow space is cross‐braced by
tions connecting the vascular net of the marrow spaces
mineralized struts of various thickness, the trabeculae.
with the vascular net of the PDL. This PDL net is also sup-
These trabeculae divide the inner bone space into cells of
plied from the apical where dedicated vessels enter the
various sizes and are referred to as cancellous bone
pulp canal of the tooth. The flow of the PDL net is apical–
(Figures 3.2, 3.5–3.7).
coronal into the marginal attached gingiva where it merges
The interface between the mineral compartment of the
interior trabeculae and the internal soft tissue (marrow) is
lined by a single cell layer of cells (the liner cells) which is
thought to be composed of resting osteoblasts. The inter-
face with the external surfaces of compact or cortical bone
and their investing soft tissues is enveloped by a more
complex periosteum, which varies in configuration
dependent on the surrounding connective tissue inter-
faces (see Figures 3.3, 3.14, and 3.16).
MAXILLARY
BONE SINUS
MEMBRANE
Figure 3.3 Maxillary sinus periosteum (Monkey/vascular‐India ink perfused). This is representative of a “lifted” sinus membrane.
3 4
2
MGJ
B L
L B
Figure 3.6 Internal microarchitecture. (a) Maxillary bicuspid. (b) Mandibular first bicuspid. Note different cortical and trabecular thicknesses. B, buccal
area; L, lingual area.
(a) (b)
B L
L B
Figure 3.7 Internal microarchitecture of furcation area of first molars. (a) Maxillary first molar. (b) Mandibular first molar. Note differences in cortical and
trabecular dimensions at maxillary versus mandibular sites. B, buccal area; L, lingual area.
structures of intramembranous origin with which it shares nent of this encircling anastomosis may be located verti-
collateral vascular supplies. In the maxilla, as noted, the cally about 19 mm from the alveolar margin. It may be
major blood supply to bone and teeth comes from the found within the marrow of the antral wall (if the wall is thick
pterygopalatine division of the maxillary artery, the poste- enough) or within the periosteal layer of the sinus lining
rior superior alveolar. In the maxillary sinus, the blood flow immediately inside the wall (Figure 3.10). A third variation
also has contribution from the infraorbital and spheno- encountered by the author is illustrated in an ink perfused
palatine arteries. A major arterial circuit formed from specimen (Figure 3.11). This latter variation is not always
branches of the posterior superior alveolar and the infraor- readily apparent on CT scans and may result in significant
bital coursing from posterior to anterior around the buccal bleeding during sinus membrane elevation. The spheno-
and medial walls of the sinus was reported by Solar et al. palatine artery also distributes along the lateral nasal wall
(1999). Of interest in performing the lateral window which is paper thin bone separating the nose and the max-
approach to the sinus lift bone graft, the buccal compo- illary sinus (Rosano et al. 2009).
Blood supply to
interproximal
bone from
marrow below
Figure 3.20 (a) Partial‐thickness flap. (b) Full‐thickness flap. No Structural differences of the epithelial interface with a tita-
vessels are exiting bone surface. nium implant substitute include an epithelial attachment
with a circumferential collagen fiber zone apical to this.
There is no supracrestal fiber attachment and vascularity
mirrors mucosal supply pattern present below the MGJ
(Berglundh et al. 1994).
Volkman canal
vessel
THE WOUND‐HEALING PROCESS
While the wound‐healing process in periodontal surgery
involves mechanisms common to other areas of the body,
most notably, the skin, it has some unique features related
to the presence of a tooth. Rates of activity may vary (turn-
Buccal over rate of alveolar bone versus basal bone) (Garant
cortex 2003), and microenvironments of local tissue architecture
(attached gingiva, PDL, MGJ, etc.) may influence the local
microvasculature (Price 1974), but the general pattern and
sequence of healing activities seem to be the same as with
Figure 3.21 India ink–perfused specimen. skin healing. Because vascular disruption and regenera-
tion are central to wound‐healing response and we have
structure with a variety of collagen. The epithelial attach- seen how the microarchitecture of the tissue influences
ment is a unique exception to the continuous cover of the vascular patterns (compare Figures 3.14–3.16), we will
external surfaces and its reconnection to the tooth surface/ review the two compartments – soft tissues of gingiva/
implant abutment form the critical event in the wound- mucosa and hard tissues of tooth/bone – separately. As
healing process after surgical procedures around teeth and noted in the preceding anatomy review, while there is some
implants. Re-establishment of this seal recreates the barrier interconnection between hard and soft tissue supply at the
gingival margin, the hard tissues receive their vascular Figure 3.23 Fourteen days: regeneration of papillary loops. At this
supply separately from major arteries inside the bone, stage, newly forming connective tissue papillas are supplied by a web of
while the soft tissues are predominately supplied from out- expanded vessels.
side the bone.
Closure of a soft tissue wound requires epithelialization, layers and attract more PMNs and macrophages from
fibroplasia, and angiogenesis/vasculogenesis which occur adjacent leaky venules (6–10 hours) (Clark 1996). The non-
simultaneously but at different rates during the early stages collagenous protein vitronectin, which is produced by the
of healing. Immediately following an incision deep enough liver and circulates in the blood serum, possibly acts as a
to injure the vasculature, platelets from within the blood ves- preliminary substrate for migration of these early scaven-
sels (normal range, 150 000–400 000/μl, produced by mega- ger cells.
karyocytes in the bone marrow; Ganong 2001; Schmaier
2003) are exposed to perivascular collagen and begin to Epithelial cells adjacent to the wound edge respond almost
adhere to the wound margins. This adherence activates immediately to injury and begin to migrate across the fibrin
extrusion of granules from inside the platelets, some of clot surface at rates estimated to be 0.5 mm/day. Within
which facilitate the transformation of prothrombin to throm- 24 hours, adjacent epithelial cells, formerly quiescent, also
bin, which in turn catalyzes soluble fibrinogen to fibrin. begin to proliferate and migrate. Meanwhile, the PMNs
within the clot begin to phagocytize bacteria, necrotic
The fibrin net enmeshed with increasing numbers of plate- cells, and platelet debris. Resident macrophages are
lets, red blood cells, circulating polymorphonucleocytes joined by monocytes migrating out of leaking vascular
(PMNs), and macrophages contributes to an initial vascu- channels and begin to cleanse the wound of debris and
lar plug or clot, which slows and stops further bleeding. broken degenerating PMNs (PMNs survive 24–48 hours)
This temporary or provisional matrix of cells and fibers (Bartold et al. 1998; Garant 2003). At the same time, the
releases a variety of chemical attractants and activators macrophages release additional growth factors and cellular
(cytokines). Platelet‐derived growth factor (PDGF), vascu- fibronectin, which, with fibrin, become the attachment
lar endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and transforming surface for the subsequent wave of migrating cells – the
growth factor (TGF-ß) stimulate the surrounding tissue fibroblasts, endothelial, and epithelial cells.
Clark, R.A.F. (1996). The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Price, A.M. (1974). Comparison of the microvascular disruption and
Repair, 2e. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Plenum Press. regeneration following full, partial, and modified partial thickness
flaps in the alveolar mucosa of Macaca mulatta. DScD thesis.
Folke, L.E.A. and Stallard, R.E. (1965). Periodontal microcirculation as Boston University, Boston.
revealed by plastic microspheres. J. Periosteal. Res. 2: 53–63.
Price, A.M., Nunn, M., Oppenheim, F.G., and Van Dyke, T.E. (2011).
Folkman, J. and Klagsbrun, M. (1987). Angiogenic factors. Science De novo bone formation after the sinus lift procedure. J. Periodontol.
23: 442–448. 82: 1245–1255.
Ganong, W.F. (2001). Review of Medical Physiology, 20e. New York: Rhinelander, F.W. (1974a). The normal circulation of bone and its
Lange Medical Books/McGraw‐Hill. response to surgical intervention. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 8: 87.
Garant, P.R. (2003). Oral Cells and Tissues. Chicago: Quintessence. Rhinelander, F.W. (1974b). Tibial blood supply in relation to fracture
healing. Clin. Orthop. 105: 34.
Ham, A.W. (1965). Histology, 5e. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
Rodan, H. (1981). The role of osteoblasts in hormonal control of bone
Kurkinen, M., Vaheri, A., Roberts, P.J., and Stenman, S. (1980). resorption – a hypothesis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 33: 349–351.
Sequential appearance of fibronectin and collagen in experimental
granulation tissue. Lab. Investig. 43: 47–51. Rosano, G., Taschieri, S., Gaudy, J.F., and Del Fabbro, M. (2009).
Maxillary sinus vascularization: a cadaveric study. J. Craniofac.
Lee, W. (2016). Space analysis of the maxillary anterior bone Surg. 20: 940–943.
geometry to understand anatomical limitation: an implant simula-
tion study using Cone‐Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). MSD Schmaier, A.H. and Petruzzelli, L.M. (2003). Hematology for the
thesis. Boston University, Boston. Medical Student. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Lustig, J.P., London, D., Dor, B.L., and Yanko, R. (2003). Ultrasound Solar, P., Geyerhofer, U., Traxler, H. et al. (1999). Blood supply to
identification and quantitative measurement of blood supply to the the maxillary sinuses relevant to sinus floor elevation procedures.
anterior part of the mandible. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Clin. Oral Imp. Res. 10: 34–44.
Radiol. Endod. 96: 625–629.
Winet, H. (1996). The role of microvasculature in normal and per-
Mordenfeld, A., Andersson, L., and Bergström, B. (1997). Hemorrhage turbed bone healing as revealed by intravital microscopy. Bone 19
in the floor of the mouth during implant placement in the edentulous (Supplement 1): 39S–57S.
mandible: a case report. JOMI 12: 558–561.
Woodburne, A.M. (1965). Essentials of Human Anatomy, 3e. New
Mori, L., Bellini, A., Stacey, M.A., Schmidt, M., and Mattoli, S. (2005). York: Oxford University Press.
Fibrocytes contribute to myofibroblast population in wounded skin
and originate from the bone marrow. Exp. Cell Res. 30: 81–90.
35
Figure 4.1 Piezocision is done interproximally, making sure to Figure 4.4 Prior to Piezocision assisted orthodontics.
decorticate past the cortex into the medullary bone.
Figure 4.9 The minimal opening provided by the surgical guide allows for
precise incisions avoiding the danger of root damage during Piezocision.
Figure 4.14 Piezocision on the maxilla and mandible is done after Figure 4.16 Patient has a better smile. The diastemas are closed and
Clincheck analysis. the teeth have been retracted to complement her profile.
INCORPORATING PIEZOCISION
IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY TREATMENT
A 42 year old woman presented with a Class I malocclusion
with anterior crowding. Her main concerns were the crowd-
ing and discoloration of her teeth as well as some white den-
tal spots (Figures 4.17–4.19). She was very happy with her
present profile and lip support, and did not want any change
to the position of her lips. A multidisciplinary treatment plan
was devised to address all of her concerns. The first stage
of the treatment was the resolution of the maxillary and man-
dibular crowding and the retraction of the anterior upper
teeth to create enough space for the minimally invasive
Porcelain Laminate Veneers preparations. When conven-
tional orthodontic therapy was initially suggested to the
patient, some resistance was encountered because of the
Figure 4.15 Finished treatment. length of treatment. The patient also clearly stated that she
Figure 4.20 The patient wears the aligners after the Piezocision procedure.
The patient was then sent to the restorative dentist who pre- Figure 4.25 Final restoration in place: porcelain laminate veneers
pared the teeth for the porcelain veneers (Figures 4.24 and (Prosthetics Dr. Galip Gurel).
4.25). Her total treatment time including the restorative work
was six months (Figure 4.26). Placing the teeth to be
restored in an ideal position prior to prosthetic work using
orthodontics allows for the practice of Minimally Invasive
dentistry which is most beneficial for the patient.
POST‐OPERATIVE CARE
Patients are usually given a short course of analgesic
drugs (acetaminophen or ibuprofen). Usually a three days
supply will suffice.
2. Medically compromised patients (specifically bone Dibart, S., Sebaoun, J.D., and Surmenian, J. (2009 Jul‐Aug).
pathology) Piezocision: a minimally invasive, periodontally accelerated ortho-
dontic tooth movement procedure. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent.
3. Patients on long term anti‐inflammatory drugs 30 (6): 342–344.
4. Untreated periodontal diseases Dibart, S., Yee, C., Surmenian, J. et al. (2014 Aug). Tissue response
during Piezocision‐assisted tooth movement: a histological study in
5. Ankylosed teeth rats. Eur. J. Orthod. 36 (4): 457–464.
6. Noncompliant patients
Dibart, S., Keser, E., and Nelson, D. (2015). Piezocision™ assisted
7. Patients/operator with a pacemaker or any other active orthodontics: past, present and future. Semin. Orthod. 21: 170–175.
implants
Keser, E.I. and Dibart, S. (2011 Mar). Piezocision‐assisted invisalign
treatment. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 32 (2): 46–48.
POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS
Milano, F., Dibart, S., Montesani, L., and Guerra, L. (2014 Jul‐Aug).
• Root injury
Computer‐guided surgery using the piezocision technique. Int. J.
• Infection Periodontics Restorative Dent. 34 (4): 523–529.
• Mucogingival defects
REFERENCES
Charavet, C., Lecloux, G., Bruwier, A. et al. (2016 Aug). Localized pie-
zoelectric alveolar decortication for orthodontic treatment in adults: a
randomized controlled trial. J. Dent. Res. 95 (9): 1003–1009.
HISTORY AND EVOLUTION superior retrofilling material, and more advanced hard and
soft tissue management techniques, procedures are more
Over the past century, surgical endodontics has been
conservative, and outcomes have become more successful.
performed for treatment and conservation of teeth with
Smaller osteotomy windows are made to conserve cortical
persistent post endodontic treatment infections.
bone. Root resection with shorter or no bevel angles, previ-
ously impossible due to lack of ultrasonic tips, are now
In 1964, with the formation of the American Association
feasible and conserve more root structure in order to pre-
of Endodontists and establishment of endodontics as a
serve a more favorable crown‐to‐root ratio. The SOM allows
dental specialty, surgical endodontics began to take on a
for locating and treating isthmuses and extra portals of exit
new face. Early on, much emphasis was placed on devel-
along the root’s long axis, ensuring a proper orientation
opment of a root‐end filling material that would provide a
and depth for the placement of a root‐end filling. It also
hermetic seal.
enables the surgeon to check for marginal integrity of the
apical seal once it is placed. This prevents leaving
While magnification and the use of a microscope for opera-
avenues for leakage, which will prevent the formation of an
tions date back to the early 1920s, it was not until 1984
impermeable seal and may ultimately result in treatment
that it was used in conjunction with an apical surgery
failure. Rubinstein and Kim (1999, 2002) reported the
(Reuben and Apotheker 1984). With the addition of the sur-
short‐term (one year) and long‐term (five to seven years)
gical operating microscope (SOM) to the armamentarium,
success rates for endodontic microsurgery to be 96.8 and
the technique and outcome for apical surgeries became
91.5%, respectively. These results are rather impressive
more conservative and predictable. After all, one cannot
considering that about 60% of the surgeries were performed
treat what one cannot see, and with the magnification of up
on premolars or molars.
to ×30 and illumination of up to ×12 with the dental over-
head light, the SOM can reveal details previously unseen to
TOOTH CONSERVATION VERSUS IMPLANTS
the surgeon. The use of the SOM has become the standard
of care in all endodontic procedures, and since 1998, all With the recent implant paradigm shift in dentistry, some
postgraduate programs in endodontics in the United States clinicians have made claims as to suggest the placement
are required to train their residents to perform procedures of immediate load implants is a more logical treatment over
under the SOM. As a result, instruments have been either treatment of the teeth via endodontics (Ruskin et al. 2005).
newly designed or modified by scaling them down to a As clinicians, we must not be easily affected or swept away
fraction of their original size to be used with the SOM. by advertisements or reading one such article. Rather, our
Ultrasonic tips and micromirrors were developed in the decisions for selecting treatment plans, modalities, and
mid‐1980s for the purpose of retropreparation and inspec- techniques should be made on an evidence‐based
tion under the SOM. Along with the introduction of new approach to dentistry and its specialties. Many have
root‐end filling material such as ProRoot mineral trioxide attempted to overplay the success of dental implants over
aggregate (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA), nonsurgical and surgical endodontic therapy. However, in
the art of endodontic surgery has shifted toward endodon- a systematic review of the literature (M.K. Iqbal and S. Kim,
tic microsurgery and has reached new heights in its levels unpublished data) there were no significant differences
of precision, predictability, and success. between root canal therapy success rates and implants. In
fact, comparing the “success” rates of endodontics and
Today, microsurgical endodontics is considered to be the implants is sometimes beyond the scope of comparing
standard of care. With the advent of SOM, microinstruments, apples and oranges.
43
Endodontically treated teeth are evaluated for success on support that in the event of a surgical approach, prior non-
the basis of clinical and radiographic criteria. An endodon- surgical retreatment will increase the chance of a positive
tically treated tooth that is asymptomatic while in function outcome (Zuolo et al. 2000). Therefore, unless nonsurgical
and displays no periapical radiolucency is classified as a retreatment is not feasible due to physical, anatomical,
successful treatment. Implants are often evaluated for their time, or financial hardships, surgical endodontics should
“success” based on their survival rate. This disparity in the not be considered as the treatment of choice.
evaluation criteria between endodontics and implants
immediately changes the “level ground” for comparison. In RATIONALE FOR ENDODONTIC SURGERY
addition, implant studies often exclude patients who have
underlying systemic diseases such as diabetes, smokers, Periapical surgery is performed to eradicate persistent
and patients with poor oral hygiene. In certain studies peri‐ infection/inflammation associated with teeth with previ-
implantitis was not regarded as a criterion for implant fail- ously negative post‐treatment outcome from either initial
ure. Also, at least presently, most implants in these studies endodontic therapy or retreatment. With advancement in
are being placed by trained specialists. microsurgical endodontics, surgery should not be labeled
as a last option, but it should be performed when either
Meanwhile, the success of endodontic therapy as evalu- initial endodontic treatment or retreatment is not possible
ated by studies did not abide to the same strict patient or feasibly cannot secure a better outcome. Factors such
exclusion criteria as did the implant studies. Persistent radio- as inability to properly access the root canal system in
graphic demineralization was considered to be a sign of order to adequately clean, shape, and obtain an apical
failure. Last, the success rate of endodontic therapy as seal may warrant surgery as the treatment of choice. The
reported by such studies as the Toronto Study is based on ability of the clinician to properly diagnose which case is
treatments performed by dental students, general dentists, suitable for surgery is as important as his or her clinical
and endodontists. In 1999, the American Dental Association skills. It was Dr. Irving J. Naidorf who said, “A good sur-
reported that only 25% of all endodontic cases were being geon knows how to cut, and an excellent surgeon knows
performed by endodontists (ADA Report 1999). when to cut” (Kim 2002).
It is clear that implants have changed the face of dentistry INDICATIONS FOR ENDODONTIC SURGERY
and the way we treatment plan restoring edentulous
Anatomical Challenges
spaces. They are a great adjunct when treatment is
planned properly and when bone quality and esthetics In certain cases, the tooth anatomy renders itself unwilling
allow for their placement. Implants are clearly not an alter- to proper debridement and obturation, leaving a portion of
native for periodontally sound and endodontically treat- canal untreated by nonsurgical methods. Teeth with canal
able (nonsurgical or surgical) teeth. Retaining our patients’ blockages due to severe calcification or with severe radic-
healthy natural dentition should be our main priority as ular curvatures fall under such category.
healthcare providers.
Also, in a few cases when endodontic therapy is performed
TREATMENT OF FAILED ROOT CANAL at a clinically acceptable level, symptoms may continue to
THERAPY persist when the apex of the root may be fenestrating
through the facial cortical plate of bone. In these cases, a
When the initial root canal therapy has resulted in a nega-
small surgical procedure to recontour the root end and
tive outcome, two revisions are possible:
align it within its bony housing may solve the problem.
• Nonsurgical retreatment aimed to eliminate bacteria
from the canal Iatrogenic Factors
• Surgical retreatment aimed to encapsulate bacteria Previous endodontic “misadventures” account for the
inside the canal need for surgery in cases with persistent symptoms. These
include but are not limited to canal blockages, ledges,
The decision as to which approach to take should be perforations, separated instruments or posts, underfilled
based on the level of evidence and other criteria such canals, and canals with dental material extruding beyond
as the dentist’s training and experience, availability of the the biologically tolerant buffer zone around the anatomical
necessary armamentarium, and the patient’s decision apex (Figures 5.1–5.3).
based on informed consent.
In most of these cases, proper canal debridement is com-
Historically, nonsurgical retreatment has enjoyed a higher promised as is the ability to properly obturate the canal
success rate than the surgical approach. Studies also and obtain a proper apical seal.
Figure 5.2 Surgery reveals a hand file extending 3–4 mm beyond the
root tip.
Relentless Inflammation
Previously missed and untreated canals, bifurcations, fins,
and extraradicular infections often harbor bacteria and
present themselves as chronically and intermittently symp- Figure 5.5 Apicoectomy performed in conjunction with finding and
tomatic teeth. Apical surgery can be performed to eradi- obturation of the additional canal and the isthmus between MB‐1 and
cate such factors (Figures 5.4–5.6). MB‐2 canals.
CONTRAINDICATIONS FOR ENDODONTIC
SURGERY
Medical History
Patients with recent myocardial infarction, with uncontrolled
diabetes, patients who are undergoing anticoagulant
therapy, patients who received head and neck radiation, or
patients with severe neutropenia are not good candidates
for surgery. Surgery should be postponed until they are
cleared by their treating physician.
Compromised Periodontium
Periodontal pockets and tooth mobility reduce the success
of endodontic surgery. High success rates in endodontic
microsurgery was achieved in studies where the pro-
spective teeth did not exhibit any pathologic periodontal
pocketing or pocketing that either communicated with the
apical endodontic component or had completely denuded
the buccal or lingual cortical plate of bone resulting in a
Figure 5.7 Multiple sinus tracts trace to the location of the endodontic dehiscence (Rubinstein and Kim 1999).
lesion.
Skill, Knowledge, and Proper Instruments
General practitioners must be knowledgeable to properly
Exploratory Surgery
diagnose and refer patients with surgical needs to sur-
In certain cases, it may be difficult to properly diagnose a geons who have the specialized training in diagnosing
problem. In cases of root fractures, for example, a small and treating these cases.
soft tissue flap followed by dying the area in question with
methylene blue and inspection under the SOM can quickly Although the skill levels of the surgeons should theo-
reveal a root fracture, which can then prevent unnecessary retically be the same, in reality this may not be the
endodontic treatment to be performed on a nonrestorable case. A study reviewed the outcome of treatment in the
tooth (Figures 5.7 and 5.8). oral surgical and endodontics departments of a teaching
hospital four years following surgery. Complete healing
Also, collection of a biopsy specimen may be another indi- for cases performed by the endodontic unit was nearly
cation for performing an exploratory surgery. twice as high for those performed in the oral surgery unit.
Anatomical Challenges
Proximity to the maxillary sinus, mental nerve, and inferior
alveolar canal and the thickness of the buccal bone in the
mandibular second molar area due to the external oblique
ridge may serve as a contraindication or deterrent for sur-
gery. As long as a properly trained clinician is aware of
such hurdles and conceivably knows how to work around Figure 5.10 Nonsurgical root canal treatment was performed with the
them and manage mid‐procedure and post-procedure aid of the SOM. The tooth was free of symptoms thereafter.
Figure 5.13 Conservative apicoectomy and obturation with MTA was Figure 5.15 Incision and drainage of an intraoral abscess. Note the
performed despite the unfavorable crown‐to‐root ratio. latex drain was sutured to prevent its premature removal.
As defined by Dr. Grossman, replantation is “the purposeful After proper case selection and review of the medical his-
removal of a tooth and its almost immediate replacement tory, local anesthesia is administered via block and local
with the object of obturating the canals apically while the infiltration to properly anesthetize the patient. The patient
tooth is out of its socket” (Kim et al. 2001a). Intentional should start to rinse with 10 ml of 0.12% chlorohexidine
replantation is an artificial setting mimicking complete tooth gluconate twice daily 24 hours before the surgery and con-
avulsion, and its management as defined by the guidelines tinue this regimen for one week following the procedure.
of the American Association of Endodontists. However, the Although somewhat of a controversy, some advocate the
circumstancing factors are near ideal. The level of tooth administration of prophylactic antibiotics 24 hours before
contamination and physical damage is likely to be far less and for one week after the procedure. It is also recom-
than in the case of an accidental injury. Moreover, the single mended that unless the patient is allergic to NSAIDs, the
most important factor in the demise of an avulsed tooth, the maximum daily dose of a drug such as ibuprofen should
extraoral dry time, is not a factor because it is practically be prescribed and taken 24 hours before and for one week
nonexistent. During intentional replantation, the tooth is after the procedure. Once the patient is seated and anes-
immediately submerged in tissue culture medium, with the thetized, it is crucial to make sure that every step of the
tooth out‐of‐socket times being under 10 minutes. procedure is well thought out and ready to be executed.
Organization translates into minimized out‐of‐socket time
The procedure dates back to the late 1500s, when Paré (less than 10 minutes) and, in turn, maximizes the potential
replanted three avulsed teeth (Kupfer et al. 1952). Intentional for a successful outcome. After administration of local
replantation has been performed for over half a century with anesthesia, the tooth can be prepared by working a periot-
success rates being reported between 80 and 95% for fol- ome circumferentially into the gingival sulcus to dissect the
low‐ups of 2–22 years by Grossman, Kingsbury, and Bender fibers. Great care must be taken not to scrape the cementum
(Kim et al. 2001b). Although many of these teeth exhibited covering the root surface. Luxation with universal forceps
some degree of ankylosis and replacement resorption, they placed only on the anatomical crown is followed. At no
were clinically functional and did not exhibit any signs of time should the beaks of the forceps be making contact
periradicular pathosis. With the development of new proto- with any portion of the tooth apical to the CEJ (cemento
cols that call for the use of Hanks balanced salt solution enamel junction) (Figures 5.16 and 5.17).
(HBSS) (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD, USA) as an inter-
mediate storage and operating medium, and the use of The use of elevators is contraindicated. It is critical to be
enamel matrix derived protein (Emdogain; Straumann, extra cautious during this step of the procedure, as a careful
Waldenburg, Switzerland) along with careful extraction and minimally traumatic extraction could be the rate deter-
techniques to prevent damage to the cementum and the mining step for the outcome. It is not unusual to take as
PDL cells, the chances of resorption can be minimized. long as 15 minutes to have the tooth fully avulsed. Forcing
the extraction could ultimately fracture the tooth or the
alveolus and cause its demise. Once the tooth is extracted,
Indications and Case Selection
the crown may be firmly wrapped with sterile gauze and
Intentional replantation should not be the treatment of choice grabbed tightly with a locking hemostat. Curettage of the
if endodontic retreatment or surgery can be performed with socket is not recommended. Making contact with the root
surface should be avoided at all times. The tooth is imme- The tooth is then reoriented properly and gently placed in
diately transferred into a basin which is filled with HBSS and its socket. Light apical pressure is applied until the tooth
submerged. Root resection is carried out by an impact air is seated in its correct, most apical position. It is prudent
handpiece under the microscope and approximately 3 mm to radiographically confirm the complete seating of the
of the root is resected (Figure 5.18). tooth in the socket at this time (Figure 5.20).
Methylene blue stain is applied to the root end and The tooth is then splinted by suturing a monofilament
observed under the microscope with mid‐range magnifi- suture over the occlusal surface of the tooth. Fishing line
cation for cracks, isthmuses, and extra portals of exit. and composite bonding can also be used by providing a
Retropreparation is made by using small pear‐shaped physiological splint when the treated tooth is splinted to its
carbide burs such as a 330 bur or ultrasonic tips. The neighbor on their buccal surfaces. The limitation of this
canals are then obturated with super ethoxybenzoic acid method is that it requires both of the teeth being splinted to
(Super‐EBA; Bosworth, Skokie, IL, USA) or MTA carried have enamel on their buccal surfaces to facilitate bonding.
in microcarriers and condensed with micropluggers. The This method excludes teeth with metal or porcelain coronal
root end is then polished or burnished and inspected coverage, which may be a good number of teeth treated
one last time under the microscope before replantation by intentional replantation. The patient should be instructed
(Figure 5.19). to maintain a maximum intercuspal position at least for the
Indications
Apicoectomy is indicated for treatment of teeth with persis-
tent apical or periradicular pathosis due to anatomical
challenges, iatrogenic factors, irretrievable dental material
inside and outside of the canal, fractures, and repair of
Figure 5.20 Radiograph immediately post reimplantation.
resorptions or perforations (Figures 5.22–5.25).
remainder of the day and to chew away from the side for Figure 5.22 Sinus tract tracing and the location of the mid‐root
about one week. Postoperative instructions are given, and radiolucency is suggestive of a post perforation.
the patient should be reappointed for follow‐up visit in one
week, at which time the sutures are removed if still intact.
Pain management instructions are given as described earlier.
Once regarded as a last resort before extraction, today
intentional replantation in selected cases is a viable and
logical mode of treatment. With the development of new
protocols for intentional replantation, the procedure has
become more predictable and should always be consid-
ered as a part of possible treatment planning (Figure 5.21).
PERIRADICULAR SURGERY
Periradicular surgeries, otherwise known as apicoectomy,
constitute the bulk of endodontic surgeries. By definition,
apicoectomy involves the reflection of a soft tissue flap, oste-
otomy of both cortical and cancellous bone, and resection of
the root segment, which is suspected to be associated with
a persistent inflammatory process. The preparation of a
retrocavity and placement of a root‐end filling material are Figure 5.23 Upon the reflection of the soft tissue flap, an isolated
not necessary requirements for an apicoectomy, although endodontic fenestration is visible.
Radiographic Examination
Exposure of two periapical radiographs is the minimum
Figure 5.24 Staining reveals a perforation on the mesial aspect of the requirement before commencement of surgery. The first
root. The defect was filled with Super‐EBA cement. radiograph should be exposed using a paralleling tech-
nique and the second should be deviated in its horizontal
component by 20° to the mesial or distal. The radiograph
should be studied for root length, number of roots, root
curvature, size of the potential lesion, and proximity of the
osteotomy to neurovascular bundles, maxillary sinus, and
neighboring teeth. It is strongly recommended that, when
possible, a panoramic radiograph is obtained, especially
when treating mandibular posterior teeth.
Presurgical Preparation
Preoperatively, unless contraindicated, the patient should
take 600–800 mg of ibuprofen just before surgery. The patient
should continue to take this regimen of anti‐inflammatory
every eight hours for up to three days after the surgery.
Figure 5.29 Submarginal incision and suturing with 6‐0 Vicryl sutures
in the esthetic zone.
Figure 5.28 Apicoectomy and retrofill with MTA was performed on all Figure 5.30 Suture removal four days later reveals great healing with
three roots via a buccal approach. minimal scar formation.
Papillary‐based Incision
This technique has been developed in recent years with
the purpose of maintaining the height of the interdental
papilla. The incision is similar to the full‐thickness intrasul-
cular incision. However, in the region of the interdental
papilla, instead of the incision including and dissecting the
papilla, it is placed at the base of the papilla. This incision Figure 5.31 Failing root canal treatment on maxillary first and second
is a curved incision that connects the sulcus of one tooth premolars.
at its mesial line angle to the sulcus of the more anterior
tooth at its distal line angle. This incision is carried out by a
microblade first to a depth of 1.5 mm. A second incision is
directed toward the osseous crest and retraces the initial
superficial incision.
Osteotomy and Curettage
Once the flap is reflected and stabilized without causing
trauma to the soft tissue, the hard tissue management
phase of the surgery may begin. The root tip location must
be approximated from a pre-operative radiograph, pres-
ence of pathology, cortical bone fenestration, or a root
prominence underlying the cortical bone. In some cases
sounding the bone quality over the root apex with a sharp
endodontic DG16 explorer (Hu‐Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA)
may give information about the location and the extent of Figure 5.32 Flap elevation reveals fenestrations over the root
the underlying lesion (Figures 5.31 and 5.32). prominences identifying the location of the defects.
Staining and Inspection
Once the root end is perceived as being completely
resected, it is time to switch the magnification to the high
Figure 5.33 Osteotomy is initiated by slow removal of the buccal range for root‐end inspection. The root end should be
cortical bone until the root tips are visible. stained with sterile methylene blue dye (American Regent
Inc., Shirley, NY, USA) and rinsed away with sterile saline or
water. The dye will stain the PDL circumferentially, reveal-
retrofilling. Therefore, it may be more strategic to leave ing a circle or an ovoid blue perimeter. This is a sign that
small amounts of granulation tissue behind and clean it the root resection was completely carried out through the
after the root‐end filling is placed. lingual aspect. The blue dye will also penetrate into any
Root Resection
The logic behind root resection and its extent is derived
from the models developed by Hess. A 3‐mm reduction in
the root end will decrease the incidence of lateral canals
by 93% and apical ramifications by 98%. Therefore statisti-
cally, a 3‐mm apicoectomy will markedly favor the elimina-
tion of persistent bacteria and undebrided tissue in the
apical root canal portion (Kim et al. 2001b). This will also
enable the surgeon to remove and eliminate iatrogenic
factors more prevalent to the last 2–3 mm of the root canal
system. Once the root is resected, access to the canal is
possible for evaluation and formation of an impervious Figure 5.34 Endodontic lesion is enucleated in whole and the root tips
retroseal. are resected with almost a zero bevel angle.
Retropreparation
After the areas to be retroprepared have been identified, Figure 5.38 Apicoectomy, retropreparation, and retrofill of the MB and
ultrasonic tips with the appropriate angulations can be ML canals and the isthmus connecting them.
Retrofill
Once the moisture is controlled, it is time for sealing the
root end. The root end must be irrigated and air dried with
a Stropko irrigator/drier with a microtip (Sybron Endo).
For more persistent bleeding in larger osteotomies, ferric Once the retrofill material is placed, it is a good practice to
sulfate solution such as Cut‐Trol (Ichthys Inc., Mobile, AL, radiographically verify the density and the depth of the fill
USA) may be used. Ferric sulfate has been shown to delay before suturing the flap. If any modifications need to be
postoperative healing (Lemon et al. 1993). Therefore, it made, this is a good time for it.
should only be used sparingly and currettaged and rinsed
thoroughly at the end of the surgery before suturing. After the quality of the filling is confirmed to be satisfactory,
the crypt must be curettaged to remove any residual mate-
Calcium sulfate such as Surgiplast (ClassImplant, Rome, rial or coagulum and to induce bleeding. The surgical site
Italy) can also be used as a mechanical barrier to promote should be rinsed with sterile saline to wash off any parti-
hemostasis in large osteotomies. Calcium sulfate is an cles or loose debris and also to rehydrate the flap and the
osteoinductive resorbable agent that may act as a barrier cortical bone, which may have been drying under the
against the more rapid mobilization of soft tissue cells intense illumination from the SOM.
Kupfer, I.J., Sidney, R., and Kupfer, B.S. (1952). Tooth replantation
Infections after endodontic surgery are uncommon. following avulsion. N.Y. State Dent. J. 19: 80.
Routine prescription of oral antibiotics is not supported by
studies and therefore not recommended. The antibiotic of Lemon, R.R., Steele, P.J., and Jeansonne, B.G. (1993). Ferric sulfate
choice for treating endodontic infections is 500 mg penicillin hemostasis: effect on osseous wound healing. Left in‐situ for
maximum exposure. J. Endod. 19: 170–173.
VK every six hours for one week. If this initial therapy does
not provide the desired pharmaceutical result, it can be Menhinick, K., Gutmann, J.L., Regan, J.D. et al. (2004). The efficacy
supplemented with 500 mg metronidazole every six hours of pain control following nonsurgical root canal treatment using
for one week. Also, the patient can be taken off of the ibuprofen or a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in a
Penicillin VK and placed on 300 mg clindamycin every randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Int. J. Endod.
37: 531–541.
eight hours for one week. In those rare cases where the
patient is severely swollen, febrile, and may have difficulty Rahbaran, S., Gilthorpe, M.S., Harrison, S.D., and Gulabivala, K.
breathing or swallowing, immediate referral to the hospital (2001). Comparison of clinical outcome of periapical surgery in
and administration of intravenous antibiotics is indicated. endodontic and oral surgery units of a teaching dental hospital: a
retrospective study. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol.
Endod. 91: 700–709.
Last, during maxillary posterior surgeries where the maxil-
lary sinus and the Schneiderian membrane have been Reuben, H. and Apotheker, H. (1984). Apical surgery with the dental
involved, the patient must be placed on a prophylactic microscope. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 57: 433–435.
dose of 875 mg of Augmentin twice daily for one week to
prevent invasion and infection of the sinus by normal oral Rubinstein, F.A. and Kim, S. (1999). Short‐term observation of the
results of endodontic surgery with the use of a surgical operation
flora. The patient should also be advised not to blow the
microscope and Super‐EBA as root‐end filling material. J. Endod.
nose and to take over‐the‐counter nasal decongestants. 25: 43–48.
A one‐week follow‐up visit is recommended to ensure no
complications have arisen. Maxillary sinus involvements, if Rubinstein, F.A. and Kim, S. (2002). Long‐term follow‐up of cases
treated in a timely manner, will often heal uneventfully. considered healed one year after apical microsurgery. J. Endod.
28: 378–383.
RECALL Ruskin, J.D., Morton, D., Karayazgan, B., and Amir, J. (2005). Failed
root canals: the case for extraction and immediate implant placement.
Patient’s healing must be monitored periodically. Because J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 63: 829–831.
the average healing time for surgical cases has been
Velvart, P. and Peters, C.I. (2005). Soft tissue management in endo-
reported to be seven months, it makes sense to recall the dontic surgery. J. Endod. 31: 4–16.
patient within one year post‐treatment. Earlier follow‐up
appointments may not indicate any healing, although healing Wang, N., Knight, K., Dao, T., and Friedman, S. (2004). Treatment
may be in progress. outcome in endodontics – the Toronto study. Phase I and II: apical
surgery. J. Endod. 30: 751–761.
For cases in which a timely secondary intervention would Zuolo, M.L., Ferreira, M.O.F., and Gutmann, J.L. (2000). Prognosis in
be imperative in case of a failure, a three‐ to four‐month periradicular surgery: a clinical prospective study. Int. Endod. J. 33:
recall schedule is justified and perhaps more beneficial. 91–98.
61
Clinical Examination bow transfer. Duplicate diagnostic casts are also made
and mounted. A diagnostic waxing of the proposed treat-
Extraoral Examination ment plan is then made. Diagnostic casts and the diag-
A thorough examination should include an evaluation of the nostic waxing represent the guide or “blue‐print” for the
size, shape, and symmetry of the head and neck including restorative plan that assists the dentist and laboratory
the patient’s profile (retrognathic, mesiognathic, prognathic). technician in coordinating the reconstruction of esthetics,
Normal and abnormal clinical findings should be noted in phonetics, and function (Morgano et al. 1989).
detail as a permanent component of the patient’s record.
Prognosis
Intraoral Examination The prognosis is a forecast of the probable course and out-
The intraoral examination includes screening for malignan- come of a disorder. The overall prognosis is concerned with
cies, an evaluation of the patient’s overall caries activity, a the entire dentition. Criteria used to assign a prognosis to
general overview of the periodontal status, and the quality individual teeth are subjective and are usually based on
and quantity of saliva. The dentist should then thoroughly clinical and radiographic findings. A favorable, questiona-
examine the existing restorations and their status, the pres- ble (guarded), unfavorable (poor), or hopeless prognosis is
ence of dental caries, and missing teeth. A complete peri assigned to each tooth depending on available bone sup-
odontal assessment is an important component of a port, probing depths, furcation exposure, mobility, crown‐
comprehensive oral examination. It includes an evaluation of to‐root ratio, root proximity, occlusal relationships, extent of
the oral hygiene, a description of the color, form, and texture tooth damage, abutment status, endodontic status, remain-
of the gingiva, a recording of probing depths, an assessment ing tooth structure (restorability), caries susceptibility, qual-
of bleeding on probing, a determination of tooth mobility, a ity and quantity of saliva, and parafunctional habits.
mucogingival evaluation, and an evaluation of furcations.
Making the decision to retain or extract a compromised tooth
Occlusal Examination and Analysis requires a thorough evaluation of all factors, including the
expense and discomfort involved in maintaining the tooth,
One of the most critical factors with regard to treatment plan-
the overall strategic value of the tooth, available literature
ning is an evaluation of the patient’s occlusion. Alterations
from clinical studies on the probability of success of the treat-
and deviations in the occlusal plane can result in a dysfunc-
ment required to retain the tooth, the prognosis of an artificial
tional maximal intercuspal position (MIP), attrition, bruxism,
replacement for the tooth, and the patient’s desires, expecta-
widened periodontal ligament spaces (trauma from occlu-
tions, and needs. Extraction of one or more teeth may be
sion), and impaired mastication. Mounted diagnostic casts
prescribed based on the presence of one or more of the fol-
represent an important diagnostic aid for the thorough evalu-
lowing factors: greater than 75% bone loss, Miller Class III
ation of a patient’s occlusion (Morgano et al. 1989).
mobility (greater than 1‐mm buccolingually, or a vertical
mobility) (Miller 1950), Glickman advanced Grade II or
Radiographic Examination Grade III/IV (through‐and‐through defect) furcation invasion
Basic knowledge of normal radiographic appearances is (Glickman 1958), recalcitrant probing depth(s) greater than
essential. The minimal examination requirements for a 8 mm, unfavorable crown‐to‐root ratio, and a history of recur-
comprehensive treatment plan include a panoramic radio- rent periodontal abscesses. A tooth can also be extracted
graph and a complete‐mouth radiographic series. The for esthetic reasons or to improve the results of orthodontic
presence of dental caries, loss of tooth‐supporting bone, treatment. When a surgical crown‐lengthening procedure
furcation invasions, and any other abnormalities should be will lead to compromised esthetics, furcation invasion, and/
carefully noted and recorded in the patient’s record. or poor crown‐to‐root ratio, extraction is commonly advised
(Becker et al. 1984; Chase Jr. and Low 1993).
Diagnostic Casts and Diagnostic Waxing
Diagnosis
Diagnostic casts are made from impressions of the dental
arches. Irreversible hydrocolloid (alginate) material is usu- Diagnosis is a determination of any variations from what is
ally used in stock metal trays. The trays should allow a considered normal. The dentist should be sensitive to the
uniform thickness of 3–5 mm of impression material. These signs and symptoms presented and note any variations
trays should be large enough to cover the retromolar pads from normal. The dental diagnosis commonly includes a
in the mandible and the hamular (pterygomaxillary) determination of the periodontal health, occlusal relation-
notches in the maxillary arch. The impressions should be ships, function of the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) and
poured immediately with cast (Type III) stone. Once the muscles of mastication, condition of edentulous areas, ana-
casts are retrieved, small nodules are removed. The casts tomic abnormalities, serviceability of existing prostheses
are mounted in a semiadjustable articulator with a face‐ and restorations, and status of the remaining dentition.
Patients
Throughout this chapter, the Universal Numbering System
has been used to designate individual teeth. Figure 6.1
summarizes and illustrates this numbering system.
Patient I
A 43‐year‐old woman presented to the clinic with a chief
complaint of, “I don’t like my smile” (Figures 6.2 and 6.3).
Diagnostic Phase
The patient’s medical history was noncontributory. She did not
have any known drug or food allergies. She did not smoke
and drank alcohol only occasionally. Her dental history Figure 6.2 Full‐face frontal view of patient.
included orthodontic treatment that was performed many
years previously to move the maxillary canines into the posi-
tions of the lateral incisors. She brushed twice per day and did
not use dental floss. Extraoral examination revealed no cervi-
cal or submandibular lymphadenopathy and no signs of tem-
poromandibular disorders (TMD) or reports of muscle pain.
8 9
7 10
6
11
5 12
4 13
3 14
2 15
1 16
32 17
30 19
• MO silver amalgam restorations, Nos. 2, 15, 30, and 31
29 20
• DO silver amalgam restoration, No. 20 The diagnosis for this patient was as follows:
• Occlusal silver amalgam restoration, No. 30
• Generalized chronic mild gingivitis
• Generalized inflammation with supragingival calculus in
the mandibular anterior • Localized chronic moderate periodontitis
• Probing depths within normal range for most teeth with • Multiple defective dental restorations
the exception of teeth No. 3 (distal 5 mm) and No. 14
(distal 5 mm) (Figure 6.6) Treatment-Planning Phases
• Rotated tooth, No. 12 The objectives of therapy for this patient were elimination
of the etiologic factors (open margins and defective resto-
• Absence of hypermobility or furcation invasion rations), control and resolution of periodontal inflammation,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Facial 323 533 323 312 313 323 323 323 323 335 323
Palatal 323 433 323 323 323 323 323 323 323 335 323
Mobility N N N N N N N N N N N
Furcation 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobility N N N N N N N NN N N N
Furcation 0 0 0 0
Lingual 323 333 323 323 212 322 223 212 323 323 323 323
Facial 323 333 323 323 212 322 223 212 323 323 323 323
32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17
(b) (b)
Figure 6.7 (a) Teeth Nos. 3, 5, and 6 after removal of defective Figure 6.8 (a) Teeth Nos. 11, 12, and 13 after removal of defective
restorations. (b) Teeth after repreparation. restorations. (b) Teeth after repreparation.
and restoration of esthetics and function. Initially, only a in the area of No. 4. This discrepancy compromised the
tentative treatment plan was presented to the patient. This overall esthetic appearance and contributed to plaque
plan included the removal of artificial crowns, evaluation of accumulation. There was also a gingival line discrepancy
the restorability of teeth, and plaque control measures. between the central incisors and the lateral incisors
because the lateral incisors were originally canines that
Initial Periodontal Phase were orthodontically repositioned.
This phase included scaling and root planing on the distal In addition, there was a gingival line discrepancy between
surfaces of Nos. 3 and 14, oral hygiene instructions, and Nos. 11, 12, and 13 (Figure 6.9). Based on these findings,
reevaluation of any pocket reduction and oral hygiene. a definitive treatment plan was presented to the patient.
This plan was (Figure 6.10) as follows:
Provisional Phase
• Soft tissue augmentation, area No. 4
In the provisional phase, the defective fixed restorations
were removed (Figures 6.7 and 6.8) and replaced with • Microsurgical crown lengthening procedure, Nos. 8 and
physiologically and esthetically acceptable provisional 9 for esthetic purposes
restorations.
• Surgical crown‐lengthening procedure, No. 13 for
esthetic purposes
In evaluating the gingival line in the maxillae, a gingival
line discrepancy was noted that was caused by the pontic • Metal‐ceramic FPD, No. 3‐x‐5
Figure 6.10 Preprosthetic treatment plan: (a) Soft tissue augmentation, area
No. 4. (b) Microsurgical crown‐lengthening procedure, Nos. 8 and 9, for esthetic
purposes. (c) Crown‐lengthening procedure, No. 13, for esthetic purposes.
(c) (f)
(g)
(d)
(h)
(e)
(i)
Figure 6.11 (a and b) Soft tissue inlay graft site No. 4, preoperative view. (c) Split‐thickness flap site No. 4. (d) Connective tissue graft obtained from
the patient’s palate. (e) Graft sutured to the periosteum with chromic gut sutures. (f and g) Flap sutured without tension. (h) One week after surgery. (i) Two
months after surgery.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.12 Surgical crown lengthening procedure tooth No. 13. (a) Preoperative view. (b) 3‐mm distance allowed between anticipated finish line of
crown preparation and alveolar crest. (c) Site sutured with vertical mattress technique and 4–0 chromic gut sutures. (d) Two weeks after surgery.
New provisional restorations were fabricated, relined, and The veneers were luted with resin cement (Variolink II,
cemented with temporary cement (Temp Bond; Kerr, Ivoclar Vitadent, Amherst, NY, USA). The provisional resto-
Romulus, MI, USA) (Figure 6.16). rations for Nos. 3‐x‐5, 12, and 13 were recemented with
Temp Bond cement. Because the resin luting agent
One week later, a final impression was made with polyether requires an average of two weeks for the shade to mature
impression material (Permadyne Penta L and Impregum beneath the veneers, the final shade selection for the
Penta; 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) (Figure 6.17). remaining restorations was delayed. The final determina-
tion after two weeks was Vita A2 (Figure 6.19).
A face‐bow record was made and jaw relation records at
MIP were made. A definitive cast was fabricated, along At that stage, the application of porcelain to the remainder of the
with a cast of the provisional restorations, and these casts restorations was accomplished with Vita A2 porcelain.
were mounted in an articulator (Mark II Denar; Water Pik Restorations were glazed and the metal was polished. At the
Technologies, Fort Collins, CO, USA). The shade was day of final delivery, provisional restorations were removed.
(c) (e)
(d)
(f)
(g)
Figure 6.13 Microsurgical crown‐lengthening procedure for the facial surfaces of Nos. 8 and 9 to correct gingival line discrepancy. (a) Preoperative
view. (b) Vertical incisions at the line angles of Nos. 8 and 9 by using a microsurgical blade. (c) Full‐thickness flap elevated. (d) Ostectomy completed. (e)
Flaps sutured with 7‐0 Vicryl sutures. (f) One week after surgery. (g) Two weeks after surgery.
Prognosis
The overall prognosis for the treatment provided (short and
long term) is favorable.
Patient II
A 70‐year‐old man presented to the clinic with a chief com-
plaint of, “I need some implants for my lower jaw. My other
dentist just finished all my upper teeth last year, and he
sent me to you for the implants” (Figure 6.24).
Diagnostic Phase
The patient’s medical history was noncontributory. He
Figure 6.14 Wax replica of proposed treatment plan. did not have any known drug or food allergies. He had a
previous history of smoking for 30 years, but for the past
3 years he has been using a nicotine patch and nicotine
A cleaning solution (Cavidry; Parkell, Farmingdale, NY, USA) supplement gum. He had been smoke‐free since
was applied to all preparations to remove any oily residue, and then. He drank alcohol occasionally. His dental history
clinical try‐in of all restorations was completed. A resin‐modified included multiple extractions and fixed restorations.
glass ionomer cement (Rely‐X Luting; 3M ESPE) was used for Extraoral examination revealed no cervical or subman-
final cementation of all restorations (Figures 6.20–6.23) two dibular lymphadenopathy and no signs of TMD or reports
months after completion of all periodontal surgical procedures. of muscle pain.
(a) (c)
(b) (d)
Figure 6.16 Provisional restoration, Nos. 3‐x‐5‐6‐8‐9‐11‐12‐13. (a) After contouring. (b) In the mouth.
(a) (b)
Figure 6.17 (a) Gingival displacement cord in place. (b) Final impression with polyether impression material.
The intraoral and radiographic examinations revealed the • No hypermobility of the teeth or furcation invasions,
following (Figures 6.25 and 6.26): except for No. 18, which had Class II hypermobility and
Grade III furcation invasion
• Missing, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25,
26, 29, 30, and 32 Maxillary and mandibular alginate impressions were made,
along with a face‐bow transfer and centric jaw relation
• Metal‐ceramic FPD, Nos. 4‐x‐6 record. The diagnostic casts were mounted in a semi
• Metal‐ceramic crowns, Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 adjustable articulator.
• Defective metal‐ceramic FPD, 22‐x‐x‐x‐x‐27‐28 The diagnosis for this patient was as follows:
• MOD silver amalgam restorations, Nos. 18 and 31
• Generalized mild gingivitis with localized moderate peri-
• Inadequate endodontic therapy, No. 20 with defective odontitis, No. 18
restoration
• Partial edentulism
• Normal probing depths (between 2 and 3 mm), without • Recurrent dental caries
bleeding upon probing, except for No. 18 where the
probing depths were 6 mm on the mesial surface and • Defective dental restorations
5 mm on the distal surface • Inadequate endodontic treatment
(b) (d)
Figure 6.18 Porcelain laminate veneers, Nos. 8 and 9, on cast (a) and bonded (b). (c) Cast framework for FPD, Nos. 3‐x‐5, and zirconia coping, No. 6.
(d) Zirconia coping, No. 11, and castings for crowns, Nos. 12 and 13.
(b) (d)
(e)
Figure 6.20 (a) Final restorations after porcelain application and glazing. (b) Intraoral try‐in. (c) Corrected soft tissue profile Nos. 6, 8, 9, and 11. (d and
e) All‐ceramic crowns Nos. 6 and 11 with the clinical appearance of missing Nos. 7 and 10.
(a)
(c)
(b)
(d)
Figure 6.23 Before (a) and after (b) (full‐face view). Before (c) and after (d) (close‐up view).
Provisional Phase
The defective metal‐ceramic FPD Nos. 22‐x‐x‐x‐x‐27‐28
was removed (Figure 6.30).
The provisional FPD was cemented with Temp Bond Figure 6.25 Intraoral views. (a) MIP. (b) Maxillary arch. (c) Mandibular arch.
cement (Figure 6.36).
(a)
(b) (c)
Figure 6.27 CT scan evaluation. (a) Panoramic cut. (b) Horizontal cut. (c) Segmental cut.
Figure 6.28 Preprosthetic phase. Tooth No. 20 was extracted atraumatically. (a) Incision. (b) Extracted tooth. (c) Undamaged socket (then implants were
placed, Nos. 19, 20, 21, and 29).
(b)
Figure 6.29 Implants were uncovered four months later. (a) Right side.
(b) Left side.
Diagnostic Phase
The patient’s medical history was noncontributory. She
did not have any known drug or food allergies. She did
not smoke or drink alcohol. Her dental history included
multiple extractions and multiple restorations per-
formed outside of the United States in 2001. She
brushed twice per day and did not use dental floss.
Figure 6.31 Cast post‐and‐core. (a) Try‐in. (b) Delivery. Extraoral examination revealed no cervical or subman-
dibular lymphadenopathy and no signs of TMD or
reports of muscle pain.
Prognosis
The overall prognosis for the treatment provided (short‐ The intraoral and radiographic examinations noted the
and long‐term) is favorable. following (Figures 6.47 and 6.48):
(a) (b)
Figure 6.32 Impression was made for fabrication of provisional restorations. (a) Impression copings in place. (b) Impression.
(a) (b)
Figure 6.33 (a) Face‐bow transfer. (b) Casts mounted in centric relation.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.34 Surgical mounts (a and b) of the dental implants were prepared to be used as temporary abutments (c and d).
• Generalized redness, edema, and glazing of the gin- • Distal carious lesions, Nos. 22 and 27
giva, especially in the maxillary anterior sextant
• Probing depths within the normal range (2–3 mm),
• Missing, Nos. 1, 3, 5, 9, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 28, 30, and 32 except for teeth Nos. 4, 6, 10, 11, and 15, where probing
depths ranged between 4 and 5 mm (Figure 6.49)
• Multiple defective restorations, Nos. 2‐x‐4‐x‐6, Nos.
7‐8‐x‐10, and Nos. x‐29‐x‐31 • Generalized bleeding upon probing
• Endodontic therapy, Nos. 4, 7, 11, 29, and 31 • No hypermobility or furcation invasions (Figure 6.49)
• Inadequate endodontic therapy, No. 31 • Multiple teeth with inadequate endodontic therapy
• Occlusal silver amalgam restoration, No. 16 with mesial • Localized bone loss (10–15%), distal surface of No. 15
and distobuccal carious lesions and the mesial surface of No. 10 (Figure 6.48)
• Mesial drift, Nos. 15 and 16
Impressions were made with alginate (Jeltrate). Her diag-
• Defective restorations, dental caries, and inadequate nostic casts were mounted in centric relation in a semi-
endodontic therapy, Nos. 20 and 21 adjustable articulator with a face‐bow record (Figure 6.50).
(b) (d)
Figure 6.35 (a) Wax replica of the mandibular arch. (b) Heat processed provisional restoration. (c and d) Provisional restoration after reline and
temporary cementation.
• Partial edentulism
• Carious lesions
(b) (d)
(e)
Figure 6.37 (a) Final impression made with polyether impression material. (b) Soft tissue replicas around implant analogs. (c–e) Fixed bilateral
mandibular record bases for centric relation record.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.38 (a) Jaw relation record at centric relation with Lucia jig (Lucia 1983) on anterior teeth and silicone registration material (Blu Mousse) on the
posterior teeth. (b) Lucia jig was then replaced with hard wax and relined with Temp Bond cement for stability of the casts during the mounting. (c) Casts
mounted. (d) Diagnostic cast of existing mandibular provisional restoration was also mounted.
The objectives of therapy for this patient were elimination • Metal‐ceramic FPDs, Nos. 2‐x‐4‐x‐6, 12‐x‐15, 27‐x‐29‐x‐31,
of the etiologic factors (open margins, overcontoured arti- and 8‐x‐10
ficial crowns, inadequate endodontic therapy, and dental
• Metal‐ceramic crowns, Nos. 7, 11, 20, and 21
caries), control and resolution of periodontal inflammation,
and restoration of esthetics and function. • Endodontic retreatment, cast posts‐and‐cores, and
metal‐ceramic crowns, Nos. 7, 20, 21, 29, and 31
Initially, only a tentative treatment plan could be presented
to the patient. This plan, according to the diagnostic wax-
Initial Periodontal Phase
ing, included the following (Figure 6.51): This phase included complete‐mouth dental prophylaxis with
scaling and root planing on the distal surface of No. 15, oral
• Removal of artificial crowns to evaluate the restorability hygiene instructions, re-evaluation of oral hygiene and pocket
of the teeth and to eliminate plaque retentive factors reduction, three to four weeks after the initial therapy.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.39 (a and b) Clear vacuum‐formed shell of duplicate cast of patient’s provisional restoration to be used as a three‐dimensional guide for
fabrication of custom abutments. (c and d) Milled custom abutments.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.40 (a) Metal castings and frameworks. (b) Metal try‐in. (c) Fit Checker silicone disclosing material to verify fit. (d) Final shade was Vita A2.
The treatment plan consisted of the following: accepted an alternative treatment plan for the mandible
that included the following:
• Extraction of No. 16
• Endodontic retreatment, Nos. 20, 21, 29, and 31
• Metal‐ceramic FPD, Nos. 8‐x‐10, 12‐x‐15
• Metal‐ceramic crowns, Nos. 20 and 21
• Metal‐ceramic crowns, Nos. 2, 6, 11, 20, 21, and 27
• Metal‐ceramic FPD, Nos. 27‐x‐29‐x‐31
• Implant‐supported metal‐ceramic crowns, Nos. 3‐4‐5,
18‐19, 28, and 31
Preprosthetic Periodontal Phase
• Surgical crown‐lengthening procedure, Nos. 6–11
After the definitive treatment plan was presented to the
• Endodontic retreatment, cast posts‐and‐cores, and patient, the patient entered phase III of the treatment,
metal‐ceramic crowns, Nos. 7, 20, 21, 29, and 31 which was the preprosthetic periodontal phase. This phase
began with surgical crown lengthening in the anterior sex-
The patient accepted the proposed treatment plan for the tant to obtain more crown length and to improve esthetics.
maxillae, but because of financial constraints, she A surgical guide was used (Figure 6.58).
(c)
Figure 6.41 Restorations after porcelain application. (a) In occlusion. (b) Frontal view. (c) Occlusal view.
(a) (b)
Figure 6.42 Canine guidance. (a) Right side. (b) Left side.
(a) (b)
Figure 6.44 Intraoral view before (a) and after (b) treatment.
Figure 6.45 Patient’s smile after treatment. Figure 6.46 Full‐face frontal view of patient.
A full‐thickness flap was elevated and ostectomy was per- After crown‐lengthening procedures, a minimal healing
formed to obtain a 3‐mm distance between the anticipated period of six weeks was required before repreparation of
gingival line Pas displayed in the template and the osse- the teeth and relining of the provisional restorations
ous crest, allowing space for the supracrestal gingival tis- because 12 days are required for the junctional epithelium
sues. The flap was placed at the desired position and to form, but the lamina propria is not completely formed
sutured with a vertical mattress technique by using 4‐0 until six weeks (Listgarten 1972a, 1972b) (Figure 6.60).
chromic gut sutures (Figure 6.59). This patient also required a surgical crown lengthening
Facial 323 325 524 323 323 325 423 323 323 333
Palatal 333 325 323 323 323 323 533 323 335 333
Mobility N N N N N N N N N N
Furcation 0 0 0 0 0
Furcation 0 0 0 0
Mobility N N N N N N N N N N
Lingual 332 323 323 323 323 323 323 333 323 333
Facial 323 323 323 323 323 323 323 333 323 323
32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17
(a) (b)
Figure 6.53 Caries control and temporization, teeth Nos. 20 and 21. (a) Facial view. (b) Lingual view.
Figure 6.54 Intraoral views before (a) and after (b) provisional restorations were placed. Note improved oral hygiene in (b)
Figure 6.57 Wax replica of finalized treatment plan for mandibular arch.
Prosthetic Phase
The implants were uncovered six months after placement
(Figure 6.68). The provisional restoration was relined over
the healing abutments four weeks after uncovering
(Figure 6.69).
(b)
Figure 6.58 Crown lengthening for the anterior sextant to gain crown length and for esthetic purposes (a) with the use of a surgical guide template to
assist the periodontist (b).
(a)
(c)
(b) (d)
Figure 6.59 Crown‐lengthening procedure for teeth Nos. 6–11. (a) Preoperative view. (b) Full‐thickness flap elevated and ostectomy performed. (c)
Closure with 4‐0 chromic gut sutures. (d) One week after surgery.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.60 Intraoral view before (a) and after (b) surgery. Smile before (c) and after (d) surgery.
jaw relation record were made for the mounting of the A clinical try‐in was accomplished to verify the position of
definitive cast and for the cross mounting with the cast of the custom abutments by using a verification jig fabricated
the provisional restorations. A jig described by Lucia from light polymerizing urethane dimethacrylate resin (Triad
(Lucia 1983) was used as an anterior stop and extra‐hard Tru Tray VLC Custom Impression Tray Material; Dentsply) on
baseplate wax (Tru Wax; Dentsply, York, PA, USA) was the definitive cast (Figure 6.75). At try in, it was noted that
used to make the record on the posterior teeth (Figure 6.71). the custom abutment for No. 4 was rotated on the cast. The
The definitive cast and the cast of the provisional restora- verification jig was relieved in the area of No. 4, and auto
tions were mounted and cross‐mounted (Figure 6.72). polymerizing resin material (Pattern resin LS: GC America Inc.)
was used to reline and re‐register the position of the custom
Die relief was placed on the dies (Die Spacer; Patterson abutment in the mouth. This relationship was then transferred
Brand), and an artificial acrylic resin tooth (Pilkington to the definitive cast by altering the cast (Figure 6.76).
Turner 30° tooth, 230 LS; Dentsply) was arranged to
replace No. 19 at a height equal to half the height of the Metal castings and frameworks were fabricated. The cast-
retromolar pad (Figure 6.73). A putty (Exaflex Putty; GC ings were tried in the mouth, and the fit was verified with a
America Inc.) index of the provisional restorations was silicone disclosing material (Fit Checker). The framework
made to provide a three‐dimensional view of the available was sectioned between Nos. 3–4 and 4–5 and then sol-
space to the dental laboratory technician for the fabrica- dered (Figure 6.77). The soldered casting for Nos. 3‐4‐5
tion of the custom abutments (Figure 6.74). was tried again in the mouth, and the fit was verified.
(b)
(d)
(e)
Figure 6.61 Crown‐lengthening procedure for teeth Nos. 20 and 21. (a) Preoperative. (b) Provisional crowns removed. (c) Incision. (d) Suturing. (e)
After suture removal.
(a)
Figure 6.63 CT scan evaluation for the implants. (a) Panoramic cut. The segmental cuts. (b) No. 3. (c) No. 4. (d) No. 5.
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 6.64 Extraction of tooth No. 4. Note the Seibert’s Class I ridge defect. (a) Incision. (b) Socket. (c) Tooth sectioned and removed in two pieces.
(d)
(c)
(e)
(f)
Figure 6.65 Sinus floor elevation and guided bone regeneration. (a) Lateral window approach performed and sinus membrane elevated. (b) Sinus
augmented with DFDB, Bio‐Oss bovine bone, and autogenous bone. (c) Decortication of buccal plate for ridge augmentation. (d) Site grafted with DFDBA
and Bio‐Oss bovine bone. (e) Resorbable membrane placed. (f) Closure with 4‐0 Vicryl sutures.
A second jaw relation record was made at the desired lain application (Figure 6.78). The shade selected was Vita
VDO with the use of a Lucia jig as an anterior stop and B1, as per the patient’s request.
extra‐hard baseplate wax (Tru Wax; Dentsply) on the pos-
terior teeth. A pick‐up impression was made of the metal At the porcelain bisque try‐in, modifications to proximal
castings with the use of polyether impression material and occlusal contacts were made. Some adjustments
(Permadyne Penta L and Impregum Penta). The casts were made also to the contours of the restorations.
were mounted and sent to the dental laboratory for porce- Canine guidance was established. The restorations
Figure 6.66 CT scan evaluation after sinus floor elevation (a). Note the gain in the vertical height (b and c) and the gain in horizontal width (d).
(a) (c)
(b)
(d)
Figure 6.67 Implant placement sites Nos. 3, 4, and 5. (a) Full‐thickness flap elevated. (b) The provisional restoration used as a surgical guide. (c)
Osteotomy sites. (d) Implants placed.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.68 Uncovering of implants. (a and b) Implants uncovered six months after implant surgery. (c and d) Tissue healing, four weeks after
uncovering. Note formation of papillae.
(a) (b)
Figure 6.69 Provisional restoration relined four weeks after uncovering. (a) Intaglio surface. (b) Provisional restoration in the mouth.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.70 Final impression of all teeth and implants. (a and b) Gingival displacement cords. (c and d) Impressions.
(a)
(b) (c)
Figure 6.71 Face‐bow transfer (a) and centric jaw relation record (b and c) by using a Lucia jig on the anterior teeth and extra‐hard baseplate wax on the
posterior teeth.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.72 Definitive casts mounted and cross-mounted with the provisional restorations. (a) Definitive cast against definitive cast. (b) Definitive cast
against cast of provisional restorations. (c) Cast of provisional restorations against definitive cast. (d) Cast of provisional restorations against cast of
provisional restorations.
(a) (b)
Figure 6.73 (a) Die relief placed on dies. (b) Acrylic resin artificial tooth placed in position of No. 19 to establish occlusal plane at a height equal to half
the height of the retromolar pad (marked in red).
(c)
Figure 6.74 Putty index of the provisional restoration was made to provide a three‐dimensional view of the available space for custom abutments for
implants. (a) Facial view. (b and c) Proximal views.
(a) (b)
(c)
Figure 6.75 (a) Custom abutments were fabricated. (b and c) Verification jig was made.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.76 (a) Try‐in of custom abutments. (b) Verification jig indicated that custom abutment for No. 4 was malpositioned. Jig was hollowed out in
area of No. 4. (c) Autopolymerizing acrylic resin was used to register correct position of custom abutment. (d) Position was transferred to definitive cast,
and cast was altered. Note pink stone where cast was altered (arrows).
(a) (c)
(b) (d)
Figure 6.77 (a) Metal castings and frameworks were fabricated. (b) Castings were tried in the mouth. (c) Fit verified with silicone disclosing material (Fit
Checker). (d) Metal framework for implant‐supported splinted crowns, Nos. 3–5, was sectioned, and reconnected with autopolymerizing acrylic resin in
preparation for soldering.
(b) (c)
Figure 6.78 At the final try‐in appointment, new jaw relation records were made at the established VDO, and a pick‐up impression was made of the
maxillary castings. The maxillary cast was mounted. (a) Frontal view. (b and c) Side views.
were then sent for final glazing. At the day of final deliv- Reliance, Worth, IL, USA). Temporary cement was used for
ery, gold screws for the custom abutments Nos. 3, 4, the implant‐supported restorations to ensure retrievability
and 5 were torqued to 32 N·cm with a torque wrench (Figures 6.79 and 6.80).
(Torque Indicator; 3I, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA).
The abutments were then torqued again to 32 N·cm after
Maintenance Phase
a 10‐minute waiting period to compensate for embed-
ment relaxation of the screws. The maintenance phase included recall visits every three
to four months.
All restorations were cemented with Rely‐X Luting resin‐
modified glass ionomer cement, with the exception of the
Prognosis
implant‐supported restorations Nos. 3–4–5, which were
cemented with temporary cement (Temp Bond) after seal- The overall prognosis for the treatment provided (short and
ing the screw holes with a temporary sealer (Dura‐Seal; long term) is favorable.
(b) (d)
Figure 6.79 (a) Porcelain applied, Vita shade B1. (b) Restorations tried in the mouth and adjusted. (c) Porcelain glazed and metal finished and polished.
(d) Final cementation.
(a)
(b)
(c) (d)
Figure 6.80 Intraoral views before (a) and after (b). Smile before (c) and after (d).
REFERENCES Mealey, B.L. and Oates, T.W. (2006). Diabetes mellitus and periodon-
tal diseases. J. Periodontol. 77: 1289–1303.
AAP position paper (1997). Periodontal considerations in the man-
agement of cancer patients. Committee on Research, Science and Miller, S.C. (1950). Textbook of Periodontia, 3e, 125. Philadelphia:
Therapy of the American Academy of Periodontology. J. Periodontol. Blackstone.
68: 791–801.
Morgano, S.M. and Brackett, S.E. (1999). Foundation restorations in
Becker, W., Berg, L., and Becker, B. (1984). The long‐term evaluation of fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. J.
periodontal treatment and maintenance in 95 patients. Int. J. Prosthet. Dent. 82: 643–657.
Periodont. Restor. Dent. 2: 55–72.
Morgano, S.M., Garvin, P.M., Muzynski, B.L., and Malone, W.F. (1989).
Buser, D., Bragger, U., Lang, N.P. et al. (1990). Regeneration and Diagnosis and treatment planning. In: Tylman’s Theory and Practice
enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin. of Fixed Prosthodontics, 8e (eds. W.F. Malone, D.L. Koth, E.
Oral Implants Res. 1: 22–32. Cavazos Jr. et al.), 1–23. St Louis: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica.
Buser, D., Dula, K., Hirt, H.P. et al. (1996). Lateral ridge augmentation Rosenberg, E.S., Garger, D.A., and Evian, C.I. (1980). Tooth lengthen-
using autografts and barrier membranes: a clinical study with 40 ing procedures. Compend. Cont. Educ. Dent. 1: 161–173.
partially edentulous patients. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 54: 420–432.
Seibert, J. (1983). Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous
Chase, R. Jr. and Low, S.B. (1993). Survival characteristics of ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and
periodontally‐involved teeth: a 40‐year study. J. Periodontol. 64: wound healing. Compend. Cont. Educ. Dent. 4: 437–453.
701–705.
Soileau, K.M. (2006). Oral post‐surgical complications following the
Davies, R. (1993). Antibiotic prophylaxis in dental practice. Br. Med. administration of bisphosphonates given for osteopenia related to
J. 307: 1210–1211. malignancy. J. Periodontol. 77: 738–743.
Dibart, S. and Karima, M. (2006). Practical Periodontal Plastic Thomson, W.M., Lawrence, H.P., Broadbent, J.M., and Poulton, R.
Surgery. Ames, IA: Wiley Blackwell. (2006). The impact of xerostomia on oral‐health‐related quality of
life among younger adults. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 4: 86 (pub-
Flocken, J.E. (1980). Electrosurgical management of soft tissues in lished online before print November 8, 2006).
restorative dentistry. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 24: 247–269.
Wooltorton, E. (2005). Health and drug alerts: patients receiving intra-
Glickman, I. (1958). Clinical Periodontology, 2e, 694–696. Philadelphia: venous bisphosphonates should avoid invasive dental procedures.
W.B. Saunders. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 172: 1684.
107
Figure 7.1 Patient presenting with a vertical height defect subsequent to Figure 7.4 The full‐thickness flap is reflected using a periosteal elevator.
the loss of teeth Nos. 8 and 9.
The role of the elevator is to now reflect the flap all the way
Figure 7.2 Tooth No. 8 will be extracted due to severe periodontal up to the alveolar crest of the edentulous site but not
disease. Notice the lack of vertical height of the alveolar bone. beyond (Figures 7.4 and 7.5). It is critical to leave the pala-
tal or lingual periosteum attached to the bone, because it
will be the only source of vascularization of the bony frag-
ment during the distraction process. Once the bony area
is exposed, it is useful to draw a picture of the segment
to be distracted on the bone using a sterile No. 2 pencil
(Figure 7.6). The base of the bony segment should be
wider at the crest than apically (Figure 7.7) to allow for
unimpaired sliding movement during the traction process.
Also at this point, it is important to remember that the dis-
tracted segment should be no shorter than 5 mm.
Figure 7.10 One hole in each arm of the distractor is predrilled; this will
allow accurate repositioning of the device.
Figure 7.7 The segment to be cut is drawn on the bone. Notice the
divergence of the cuts that will allow for free movement of the segment.
lengths. After predrilling one hole for each arm while holding
the distractor in place, the sagittal saw (set at 20 000 RPM)
is used to cut the bone (Figure 7.11). It is better not to
do a through‐and‐through cut at the beginning but to
get as close as possible to the palatal/lingual bony plate
(Figure 7.12). Also, the orientation of the saw should always
be kept slightly angled toward the alveolar crest; this
will prevent invasion of anatomical structures (i.e. the nasal
spine, the nasal cavity, or the genial tubercules).
Figure 7.12 It is important to get as close as possible to the palatal/ Figure 7.15 The distractor is securely in place.
lingual cortical plate but not go through it with the sagittal microsaw, so as
not to injure the palatal/lingual periosteum.
recommended to secure the distractor (two screws for the
upper segment and three screws for the lower segment).
Figure 7.17 After bringing back the segment to its original position, a
small incision is made close to the gingival crest to accommodate the
head of the distractor post. Figure 7.20 The temporary removable prosthesis is adjusted, so that it
will not interfere with the distractor. It will be ground down gradually as
the distraction progresses and the bone and tissues extend vertically.
Figure 7.24 Two months after the end of the distraction period, the
device is removed using a smaller incision.
Figure 7.27 The surgical wound is closed with internal and external
sutures, as before, and the area is left to heal undisturbed for one month
before placing the implants.
Figure 7.28 A 30‐year‐old patient presenting with a posterior vertical anatomical limitations, access, and proximity of vital
height defect. Tooth No. 17 cannot be used as an abutment for a fixed or structures (mandibular nerve, maxillary sinus). It is very
removable partial denture. useful to visualize the anatomy of the mandible using
a plastic model (Figure 7.29). This model (ClearView
implants shortly after the removal of the distractor; other- Anatomical Models; Medical Modeling LLC, Golden, CO)
wise, you may run the risk of losing the newly formed bone. can be obtained after the CT scan is sent to the company
(Figure 7.30). The incisions are planned on this extremely
Technique for the Posterior Segment
accurate model, and the distractor is bent and adapted
The posterior segment is much more challenging beforehand (Figure 7.31). This will save considerable
(Figure 7.28) than the anterior segments because of time, stress, and aggravation during the surgery.
Figure 7.33 The arrow shows a correct vector of distraction. The bony
segment will be distracted parallel with the long axis of the adjacent teeth.
Dental implants can be placed in the proper alignment.
Figure 7.31 The segment to be distracted is drawn on the model and
will be replicated in the mouth precisely during the surgery. The distractor
arms are modified and bent prior to the surgery to fit the clinical situation. Preoperative Instructions
This will save a lot of time and aggravation during the surgery.
• Antibiotherapy (i.e. amoxicillin 500 mg three times a
day starting the day of surgery and for seven days) is
indicated.
A Few Words of Caution
• Mild oral sedation could be useful (i.e. diazepam
• Pay special attention to the direction of the vector in
5 mg the night before and 5 mg one hour before the
the lower anterior mandibular region (Figures 7.32 and
procedure).
7.33).
• Analgesics are recommended (i.e. ibuprofen 600 mg
• Make sure that the distractor does not interfere with the
one hour before the surgery).
occlusion.
• Select patients who are reliable and compliant. Postoperative Instructions
• Always “overdistract” by a couple of millimeters to ensure • Corticosteroids for five days: dexamethasone 0.75 mg,
you will have enough bone. five tablets the day of surgery, then four tablets the
• Premature consolidation McCarthy, J.G., Staffenberg, D.A., Wood, R.J. et al. (1995).
Introduction of an intra‐oral bone lengthening device. Plast.
• Undesirable transport vector
Reconstr. Surg. 96 (4): 978–981.
• Fracture of the distraction rod or of the transport disc
Ortiz Monasterio, F., Molina, F., Andrade, L. et al. (1997). Simultaneous
(Mazzonetto et al. 2007)
mandibular and maxillary distraction in hemifacial microsomia in
adults: avoiding occlusal disasters. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 100 (4):
REFERENCES 852–861.
Birch, J.G. and Samchukov, M.L. (2004). Use of the Ilizarov method to
Samchukov, M.L., Cope, J.B., Harper, R.B., and Ross, J.D. (1998).
correct lower limb deformities in children and adolescents. J. Am.
Biomechanical considerations of mandibular lengthening and
Acad. Orthop. Surg. 12 (3): 144–154.
widening by gradual distraction using a computer model. J. Oral
Maxillofac. Surg. 56 (1): 51–59.
Block, M.S., Chang, A., and Crawford, C. (1996). Mandibular alveolar
ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis.
J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 54 (3): 309–314.
117
(a)
(b)
Flaps are mobilized and pushed in the mesial and distal Figure 8.6 Two weeks postoperatively. The area has healed uneventfully.
directions to open a “window” and place the healing
abutment. The application of gauze in the area for a few involves regular brushing with a soft bristle toothbrush
minutes facilitates the molding of the tissues while pushing (Colgate 360‐degree toothbrush) and rinsing for another
the tissues to the sides. After removing the cover screw, a week with chlorhexidine gluconate.
healing abutment with proper height, width, and shape is
inserted into the implant with or without a provisional resto
ration. This shapes the future papilla by pushing the tis SURGICAL INDEXING
sues to the sides and holding them upright (Figures 8.4 This should be considered to increase predictability and
and 8.5). The same technique is repeated for implant(s) esthetic outcome.
distal to the first implant. No sutures are applied, because
healing abutments hold the tissues in the proper position. POSSIBLE COMPLICATIONS
The patient then receives postoperative instructions and is • Complications are very unusual due to the minimally
scheduled for a follow‐up visit within 7–10 days. invasive nature of the procedure.
• Infection is always a possibility and should be treated
POSTOPERATIVE INSTRUCTIONS with local antibiotherapy and antiseptic mouth rinses.
The patient is advised to rinse with chlorhexidine g luconate
HEALING
(PerioGard oral rinse; Colgate Palmolive) twice daily for
one week and take ibuprofen (Advil) 200 mg in case of The results are very stable 1.5
years postsurgery
discomfort. Postsurgical care after the first week of healing (Figures 8.6–8.9).
REFERENCES
Adriaenssens, P., Hermans, M., Ingber, A. et al. (1999). Palatal sliding
strip flap: soft tissue management to restore maxillary anterior
esthetics at stage 2 surgery: a clinical report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac.
Implants 14: 30–36.
Figure 8.8 Five months postoperatively (palatal view). Notice the Misch, C.E., Al Shammori, K.E., and Wang, H.L. (2004). Creation of
presence of a papilla between implant Nos. 4 and 5. inter‐implant papillae through split finger technique. Implant Dent.
13: 20–27.
121
Figure 9.1 Image of a Branemark implant depicting design and surface Figure 9.3 Implant fitted into the osteotomy site (cylindrical shape)
structure. Source: Reprinted with permission from Branemark et al. Threads were pre‐tapped or formed by self‐tapping implant design upon
(1985). Tissue‐Integrated Prostheses. Quintessence, Chicago. insertion of implant.
(a) (b)
Resistance
as bevel
contacts
Contersink
sets up
tension which
yields stability
Pressure
directed
upward as
implant is
driven in
INDICATIONS
Dental implants are used to:
Figure 9.8 (a) Panoramic radiograph (distortion ±25%). (b) Periapical radiograph (distortion ±15%).
(b)
Figure 9.9 Two radiographic techniques – same patient area: (a) Conventional tomography technique. The “foggy” quality is due to slice thickness
(5 mm) which distorts image. (b) Axial CT scan: distortion ±1% (reformat slice thickness ≤0.5 mm with 2 mm spacing).
(b)
(b)
(a)
Figure 9.12 Using a pilot or round bur, future site of implant osteotomy
is marked.
(b)
B L
L B
Figure 9.16 Internal architecture notches on buccal of crown. (a) Maxillary bicuspid. (b) Mandibular first bicuspid. Note different cortex and trabecular
thickness. B, buccal area; L, lingual area.
(a) (b)
B L
L B
Figure 9.17 Internal architecture of furcation area of first molars. (Notches in tooth crown are too buccal.) (a) Maxillary first molar. (b) Mandibular first
molar. Note differences in cortical plates and trabecular dimensions at the maxillary versus mandibular sites. B, buccal; L, lingual.
During the final drill stages, a judgment needs to be threads, the osteotomy should be flushed free of debris
made about whether to tap threads. Reflecting on and then restimulated to bleed by probing the apical area.
the internal arrangement of trabeculae seen in the pic-
tures (Figures 9.16 and 9.17), it is possible to start “soft” In some systems, a final coronal shaping is needed to
and end “hard” as the last bur encounters heavy tra- countersink or expand the coronal for a slightly enlarged
beculation or the inner aspect of bordering cortex or the collar. If resistance or drill debris has been minimal during
residual compact socket framework from a recently the preparation, then one can eliminate or reduce these
extracted tooth. last steps. If the implant site is not bleeding enough to fill
the site after any of these steps, then have the patient open
If tapping threads is necessary, it should be done by hand and close several times after stimulating with a probe. This
or very low handpiece speed; the same speed used for “pumps” the maxillary artery and results in the desired fill
placement of the implant (30–50 rpm). After tapping of the osteotomy with blood.
Figure 9.19 (a) Cover screw is seated. (b) Implant is at level or below Buccal concavities: This can present the most difficulty.
alveolar crest. Sometimes threaded implants are placed and then
grafted. The implant may be placed at an acute angle
especially after failed bridge where pontic has and restored with an angled abutment. This often results
covered site) in a “knee” at gingival margin, which with time and
recession can expose the restorative margin. Another
5. Inadequate vertical height; maxillary first molar/sinus, alternative in multiple site cases may be to skip this site
lower posterior over canal and bridge it with a pontic.
6. Buccal concavities: incisal fossa, cuspid fossa Lingual concavities: In the mandibular second molar, one
(Figures 9.7 and 9.20) can change the inclination with the direction closer to
7. Lingual concavities: submandibular gland below lower that of the Curve of Wilson; however, it is necessary to
molars, sublingual gland below lower cuspid/lateral avoid encroaching on tongue space. Lower cuspid lin-
areas (Figures 9.20 and 9.22) gual concavity has multiple vascular supplies, so it is
very dangerous to perforate this area; with the potential
Slopes: Major discrepancies in site restorative platform for submylohyoid swelling and closure of airspace (see
location (mesial–distal or buccal–lingual) should be cor- Figure 9.22). A CT scan is advised if anatomy too hard to
rected with grafting. Minor contour differences can be read clinically.
adjusted for by interplay between implant anatomy and
Multiple sites: Most of the issues with multiple sites are
site anatomy. For example, if a site has a 2‐mm defi-
solved by good prosthetic guidance. In general, the
ciency from mid crest to buccal line angles, then a
implants need to be placed in the center of the respec-
Branemark style implant can be used by placing the
tive crown shape.
implant at the level of the lingual crest. This intentionally
leaves the buccal bevel exposed, but at one year, this The limits of placement proximity are different for implant‐
bone would have been lost in the cupping resorption to‐implant versus implant‐to‐tooth. The general rule is to
usually seen with this style implant. As long as the pala- have at least 2 mm of bone between implant surfaces.
tal bone and half the mesial and distal bone serve the This proximity is problematic for two reasons: Tarnow
purpose of creating surgical stability, the implant used in et al. (2003) published data supporting the need for at
this example can be left at a reasonable height and the least 3 mm to support interdental papillae. This would
C/R ratio is not affected. apply to Branemark style implants where the cupping
A Lingualis A Sublingualis
Mandibula
A Submentals
A thyreoidea
Figure 9.26 Periapical radiograph showing implants restored. Figure 9.29 Clinical picture of final implant‐supported restoration.
GINGIVAL NODULES that persist along a sinus tract following treatment may
cause the parulis to persist. In such instances, excision
Nodular proliferations on the gingiva are frequently
may be required.
encountered and represent a number of distinct entities
with different etiologies and treatment strategies. While
FIBROMA
most represent reactive or inflammatory processes, occa
sionally lesions arise that are developmental in nature, A fibroma represents a nodular proliferation of dense fibrous
perhaps resulting from stimulation of residua of odonto connective tissue that arises secondary to trauma or focal
genesis that persist in the oral mucosa following tooth irritation. Representing the most common reactive prolifera
development. tion of the oral cavity, fibromas typically present as smooth‐
surfaced firm nodular lesions that are similar in color to the
PARULIS surrounding mucosa (Figure 10.2). If the lesion is frequently
traumatized or subjected to constant irritation, surface ulcer
Inflammatory infiltrates at the apices of nonvital teeth occa
ation or hyperkeratosis may result. One form of fibroma with
sionally channelize through medullary alveolar bone, pen
distinctive clinicopathologic characteristics termed the giant
etrate the cortical bone and soft tissue, and drain into the
cell fibroma appears to have no association with trauma and
oral cavity. These inflammatory infiltrates typically follow a
is often described clinically as having a papillary surface
path of least resistance. Given this trend, in most regions
architecture. With a predilection for occurring on the gingiva
inflammatory apical lesions will drain into the oral cavity
(Magnusson and Rasmusson 1995), the giant cell fibroma is
through a sinus tract on the buccal aspect of the alveolar
typically diagnosed in patients under age 30. The histo
bone due to decreased thickness of the buccal cortical
pathologic appearance is distinctive due to the presence of
plate compared with the lingual cortex. Exceptions to this
multinucleated and stellate cells throughout the densely col
rule are the mandibular second and third molars, the pala
lagenized connective tissue stroma thought to be derived
tal roots of maxillary molars, and the maxillary lateral inci
from the fibroblast lineage (Souza et al. 2004); however, the
sors, which typically perforate lingually. At the orifice of the
presence of these stellate and multinucleated fibroblasts
sinus tract, a focal nodular proliferation of inflamed granu
in this lesion is of no known clinical significance.
lation tissue may arise, termed a “parulis” or “gum boil”
(Figure 10.1).
PERIPHERAL OSSIFYING FIBROMA
The parulis represents a focus of communication between Representing a reactive nodular proliferation of fibrous and
a pathologic cavity associated with an odontogenic infec mineralized tissue, the peripheral ossifying fibroma is a fre
tion and the oral cavity. Therefore, it is frequently possible quently encountered lesion arising exclusively on the gin
to insert a gutta‐percha point into the sinus tract and trace giva, most often from the region of the maxillary interdental
its path to the tooth that represents the source of the infec papilla (Figure 10.3). More common in females, the lesion
tion. If the sinus tract remains patent, chronic drainage will typically presents in young patients anterior to the first
allow the offending tooth to be asymptomatic. If the sinus molars (Cuisia and Brannon 2001) and may exhibit surface
tract becomes obstructed, symptoms of odontogenic ulceration (Buchner and Hansen 1979). Although the
infection will typically arise. A parulis typically resolves fol pathogenesis is not completely understood, the peripheral
lowing endodontic therapy or extraction of the offending ossifying fibroma is thought to represent a reactive pro
tooth; however, residual microorganisms and inflammation cess that frequently arises secondary to local irritation.
137
Figure 10.1 Nodular erythematous mass of granulation tissue near the Figure 10.4 Erythematous nodular mass arising from the mandibular
mucobuccal fold and associated with an asymptomatic nonvital premolar. anterior gingiva.
Source: Image courtesy of Dr. Helen Santis.
PYOGENIC GRANULOMA
The pyogenic granuloma represents an acquired vascular
lesion of the skin and mucous membranes that occurs in
patients over a wide age range. Clinically presenting as a
nodular lesion remarkable for rapid growth and frequently
exhibiting surface ulceration, the pyogenic granuloma
often bleeds on subtle provocation secondary to its vascu
lar nature. Pyogenic granulomas of the oral cavity most
commonly present on the gingiva in areas of focal chronic
irritation (Figure 10.4).
Figure 10.2 Pink, smooth‐surfaced nodular mass of the mandibular PERIPHERAL GIANT CELL GRANULOMA
attached gingiva. Source: Image courtesy of Dr. Helen Santis.
Arising exclusively on the gingiva, the peripheral giant
cell granuloma presents as an exophytic sessile or
pedunculated nodular lesion that is often dark red or
purple. Although seen over a wide age range, the periph
eral giant cell granuloma typically presents during the
fifth to sixth decades of life, is more commonly encoun
tered in females, and is seen with greater frequency in
the mandible anterior to the first molars (Bodner et al.
1997; Buduneli et al. 2001) (Figure 10.5). Focal irritation
is typically deemed the causative agent rather than a
true neoplastic process. At least one study suggests
diminished salivary flow rate and altered salivary compo
sition may increase susceptibility to such lesions due to
reduced ability to clear local irritants (Bodner et al. 1997).
A pressure resorptive defect of the underlying bone
may be appreciated in association with the peripheral
giant cell granuloma having a “scooped‐out” radiolucent
Figure 10.3 Erythematous ulcerated mass of the palatal gingiva. appearance.
GINGIVAL FIBROMATOSIS
Figure 10.16 Diffuse enlargement and erythema of the marginal and
papillary gingiva. Gingival fibromatosis represents a disorder characterized
by progressive enlargement of gingival tissues secondary
to increased numbers of collagen fiber bundles. While gin
gival fibromatosis may be idiopathic, it is often hereditary,
with most cases showing autosomal dominant inheritance.
While most cases represent isolated examples of the dis
order, gingival fibromatosis is also seen in association with
a number of hereditary syndromes. In addition to functional
concerns such as difficulty eating, speaking, and main
taining oral hygiene, gingival fibromatosis causes esthetic
concerns for the patient. Gingival fibromatosis is charac
terized by painless diffuse gingival enlargement of normal
color and firm, fibrous consistency with minimal bleeding
(Coletta and Graner 2006). Typically arising at the time of
primary or permanent tooth eruption, gingival fibromatosis
frequently causes malpositioning of teeth, retention of pri
mary dentition, delayed eruption of the permanent denti
Figure 10.17 Diffuse gingival enlargement and hemorrhage in this tion, and other functional and esthetic concerns.
patient subsequently diagnosed with monocytic leukemia.
Treatment traditionally involves gingivectomy using serial
s moking have also been implicated in the development of gingival resections together with strict oral hygiene meas
hyperplastic gingivitis. Treatment requires professional ures. One recent report suggests a more aggressive surgi
scaling and curettage and improved oral hygiene meas cal protocol of gingivectomy, odontectomy, and alveolar
ures. Chemopreventive measures such as 0.12% chlor ridge ostectomy of an entire arch at a time eliminates
hexidine rinse may be used if debridement and improved recurrence (Odessey et al. 2006); however, the manage
oral hygiene measures alone do not provide resolution. ment strategy employed depends on the individual case
Surgical recontouring of the gingival tissues using a scal and wishes of the patient.
pel or laser may be indicated for patients who are recalci
trant to conservative treatment. LIGNEOUS GINGIVITIS AND CONJUNCTIVITIS
Ligneous gingivitis represents a rare disorder character
LEUKEMIA
ized by deposition of amyloid‐like material within the gingi
Leukemia represents a hematopoietic stem cell malig val connective tissue subjacent to the oral mucosa.
nancy that produces a number of clinical signs and symp Ligneous conjunctivitis is frequently seen in association
toms intimately associated with a proliferation of atypical with gingival lesions and represents an autosomal reces
leukocytes and subsequent reduced numbers of normal sive form of chronic membranous conjunctivitis (Bateman
circulating leukocytes and erythrocytes. The most typical et al. 1986). Many cases of ligneous conjunctivitis are
oral lesions associated with leukemia include ulcerative related to plasminogen deficiency and present in patients
lesions, spontaneous gingival bleeding, and gingival of Turkish origin (Gokbuget et al. 1997; Gunhan et al. 1999).
hyperplasia (Weckx et al. 1990) (Figure 10.17). In many It is hypothesized that plasminogen deficiency caused ina
instances, oral lesions represent the first sign of the bility of fibrinolytic activity to clear fibrin d
eposits, allowing
WEGENER’S GRANULOMATOSIS
Wegener’s granulomatosis represents a necrotizing granu
Figure 10.18 Band‐like pigmentation of the attached gingiva. Source:
lomatous vasculitis most commonly involving the respira
Image courtesy of Dr. Helen Santis.
tory tract and kidneys. Oral lesions have been described
and are characterized by gingival hyperplasia remarkable
for a rough, granular appearance often likened to that of a be appreciated within the buccal mucosa, lips, tongue
strawberry, which bleed with subtle provocation (Manchanda (particularly of the fungiform papillae), and hard palate
et al. 2003). Isolated gingival lesions may represent the and is notable for a macular appearance with indistinct
initial manifestation of the disease in approximately 7% of borders (Kauzman et al. 2004). Although physiologic pig
patients (Patten and Tomecki 1993) and begin initially in mentation is not a medical concern, recent publications
the interdental papilla spreading to the adjacent gingival suggest social pressures influence some patients to
tissues. In one case report, the disease initially presented request gingival depigmentation for esthetic purposes (Tal
as a poorly healing extraction socket in a young patient et al. 2003). The most significant factor for clinicians is to
(Kemp et al. 2005). Other oral lesions may also be present, recognize the entity as a normal manifestation as opposed
including mucosal ulcerations, nodular lesions of the to a pathologic process.
labial mucosa, and palatal osteonecrosis. Biopsy with con
firmation using antinuclear cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) MEDICATION‐INDUCED PIGMENTATION
testing is critical. It is important to include Wegener’s gran Drug‐induced discoloration of the oral mucosa is caused
ulomatosis in a differential diagnosis of gingival hyperpla by an increasing number of medications. The discoloration
sia, particularly in a patient with a history of sinusitis, given can occur after direct contact with the medication or fol
the poor prognosis associated with the condition if left lowing its systemic absorption. In some instances, medi
untreated. cation stimulates melanocytes to increase melanin
production; in other instances, medication causes forma
PIGMENTED LESIONS tion of metabolites that are thought to be the cause of
Pigmented lesions are encountered with some frequency increased pigmentation. Medications typically associated
in the oral cavity. In some instances, these lesions repre with pigmentation of the oral mucosa include minocycline
sent generalized or diffuse changes; in other instances, (Figure 10.19), antimalarial medications, estrogens, tran
the pigmented change is focal in nature. quilizers, phenolphthalein found in laxatives, chemother
apy medications, and medications used to manage
patients with HIV infection (Abdollahi and Radfar 2003). In
PHYSIOLOGIC PIGMENTATION
some instances, discoloration caused by medication
Most commonly noted on attached gingiva in darker‐ resolves in the weeks following discontinuation of the med
skinned patients, physiologic pigmentation presents as a ication; however, in some instances, the change is perma
diffuse brown‐black pigmentation secondary to increased nent. Many accounts of exposure to metals such as gold,
melanocyte activity. Here, pigmentation develops during lead, mercury, and silver have been historically docu
the first two decades of life. Physiologic pigmentation is mented in the literature with a classic presentation of linear
typically bilaterally symmetrical in distribution and most pigmentation following the gingival margins described.
prominent along the labial attached gingiva in the region of Other presentations of drug‐induced pigmentation vary
the maxillary and mandibular incisors. The distribution is but include diffuse pigmentation of the palate and rare
likened to a ribbon‐like band that spares the marginal gin descriptions of pigmentation changes of the soft tissues of
giva (Eisen 2000) (Figure 10.18). Pigmentation may also the lips, tongue, eyes, and perioral skin.
SANGUINARIA‐INDUCED LEUKOPLAKIA
Exposure of the oral cavity to chemical substances, medi
cations, or dentifrice can lead to specific mucosal changes.
Chronic use of mouth rinses containing sanguinaria extract
(also known as bloodroot extract) has been shown to pro
duce leukoplakic lesions with an implied potential for
malignant transformation (Damm et al. 1999). The use of
Figure 10.24 Slightly raised pigmented lesion of the posterior hard Viadent brand mouth rinse (Colgate Oral Pharmaceuticals,
palate. Canton, MA) containing sanguinaria extract, a product of
the bloodroot plant, has been shown to produce leukopla
kic lesions of the maxillary vestibule, a site that is uncom
mon for white lesions (Figure 10.26). It is generally
recognized that these lesions frequently persist and even
recur following discontinuation of the product. Because
biopsy may show areas of mild to moderate epithelial dys
plasia, these patients need to be kept under close surveil
lance (Eversole et al. 2000). Given the apparent association
between sanguinaria‐containing dentifrice and dysplastic
leukoplakia, it is recommended that individuals presenting
with leukoplakic lesions and history of exposure to Viadent
submit for biopsy and discontinue use of the product
(Damm et al. 1999). (Portions reprinted with permission
pending from Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am. (38) 2005 21–35.)
INFECTIONS
The oral cavity is susceptible to infections with fungal,
bacterial, and viral organisms. Infections with herpes
simplex virus and oral manifestations of HIV infection are
discussed later.
Figure 10.30 Multiple painful punctate areas of ulceration involving the
HERPES maxillary attached gingiva.
Primary herpetic infection typically presents as gingivo
stomatitis with the recurrence manifesting as cutaneous/
mucocutaneous disease. Symptoms of primary herpetic
stomatitis arise after an incubation period of up to three day for five to seven days; however, the effectiveness of
weeks following infection. The prodromal symptoms are other antiviral medications such as famciclovir or valaci
not pathognomonic and include malaise, fever, head clovir has not been fully evaluated (Arduino and Porter
ache, nausea, anorexia, and irritability. Acute onset of 2006). Further, the optimal timing of initiating therapy
pain in the oral cavity is seen with the development of and optimum dose are not fully defined. Reduction of
numerous small vesicular lesions that quickly coalesce clinical signs and patient symptoms has been reported
and ulcerate. These lesions may involve any area of the for recurrent herpetic stomatitis using acyclovir (Zovirax)
oral cavity, including the gingiva, buccal mucosa, cream (5%) one application topically every three to four
tongue, palatal mucosa, vermilion, perioral skin, and hours for five days and penciclovir (Denavir) cream (1%)
oropharynx. A severe complication of primary herpetic every two hours for five days, but studies are still needed
gingivostomatitis is ocular involvement. After initial infec to determine which is more effective (Arduino and Porter
tion, oral herpes simplex virus remains latent in the 2006). A recent report advocates the utility of oral famci
trigeminal ganglion. Upon activation, the virus utilizes clovir (Famvir) in the management of herpes labialis
the axons of sensory neurons as a means to reach over (Spruance et al. 2006). Here, 1,500 mg is taken within
lying tissues. Symptomatic recurrences are common and one hour of the onset of prodromal symptoms. This
can be preceded by a prodrome of “tingling” or discom protocol was reported to reduce duration of symptoms
fort in the affected region, sometimes initially mistaken by approximately two days. In immunocompromised
for a toothache. The typical clinical presentation for patients, topical therapeutics offer little benefit. Acyclovir
recurrent intraoral herpetic infection is of multiple remains the medication of choice (Arduino and Porter
“punched‐out” painful areas of ulceration that may coa 2006). As self‐inoculation is possible, it is recommended
lesce and often follow the distribution of the greater pala patients be advised to avoid touching the lesions and
tine nerve. Recurrences are frequently attributed to then touching the eyes, genitalia, or other body areas to
manipulation of oral tissues during routine dental proce prevent infection at new sites. (Portions reprinted with
dures. The distinction between recurrent herpetic lesions permission from the Journal of the Massachusetts Dental
and recurrent apthous stomatitis (canker sores) is that Society 2005 Winter; 53 (4):55.)
herpetic ulcerations typically involve keratinized tissues
(Figure 10.30) and recurrent apthous ulcerations are
seen on moveable mucosa. Systemic antiviral therapy is
HIV‐ASSOCIATED GINGIVITIS
generally accepted as being effective for management Initially termed “HIV‐related gingivitis,” linear gingival ery
of primary herpetic stomatitis using acyclovir (Zovirax) thema presents as a red band involving the free gingival
200‐mg capsules administering one capsule five times a margin. This change is typically most prominent in the
Barker, B.F., Carpenter, W.M., Daniels, T.E. et al. (1997). Oral mucosal
melanomas: the WESTOP Banff workshop proceedings. Western
Society of Teachers of Oral Pathology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral
Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 83 (6): 672–679.
Bateman, J.B., Pettit, T.H., Isenberg, S.J., and Simons, K.B. (1986).
Ligneous conjunctivitis: an autosomal recessive disorder. J. Pediatr.
Ophthalmol. Strabismus 23 (3): 137–140.
Bill, T.J., Reddy, V.R., Ries, K.L. et al. (2001). Adolescent gingival squa
mous cell carcinoma: report of a case and review of the literature. Oral
Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 91 (6): 682–685.
Bodner, L., Peist, M., Gatot, A., and Fliss, D.M. (1997). Growth poten
tial of peripheral giant cell granuloma. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral
Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 83 (5): 548–551.
Backman, N., Holm, A.K., Hanstrom, L. et al. (1989). Folate treatment Campisi, G., Di Fede, O., and Di Liberto, C. (2003). Incisional biopsy
of diphenylhydantoin‐induced gingival hyperplasia. Scand. J. Dent. in oral medicine: punch vs traditional procedure. Minerva Stomatol.
Res. 97 (3): 222–232. 52 (11–12): 481–488.
Cheng, Y.S., Rees, T.D., Wright, J.M., and Plemons, J.M. (2001). Flaitz, C.M. (2000). Oral melanoacanthoma of the attached gingiva.
Childhood oral pemphigoid: a case report and review of the litera Am. J. Dent. 13 (3): 162.
ture. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 30 (6): 372–377.
Gallagher, G., Kabani, S., and Noonan, V. (2005). Desquamative gin
Coletta, R.D. and Graner, E. (2006). Hereditary gingival fibromatosis: givitis. J. Mass. Dent. Soc. 54 (3): 38.
a systematic review. J. Periodontol. 77 (5): 753–764.
Garcia, F.V.M.J., Pascual‐Lopez, M., Elices, M. et al. (2002). Superficial
Cuisia, Z.E. and Brannon, R.B. (2001). Peripheral ossifying fibroma – a mucoceles and lichenoid graft versus host disease: report of three
clinical evaluation of 134 pediatric cases. Pediatr. Dent. 23 (3): cases. Acta Derm. Venereol. 82 (6): 453–455.
245–248.
Giunta, J.L. (2002). Gingival cysts in the adult. J. Periodontol. 73 (7):
D’Silva, N.J., Summerlin, D.J., Cordell, K.G. et al. (2006). Metastatic 827–831.
tumors in the jaws: a retrospective study of 114 cases. J. Am. Dent.
Assoc. 137 (12): 1667–1672. Gokbuget, A.Y., Mutlu, S., Scully, C. et al. (1997). Amyloidaceous
ulcerated gingival hyperplasia: a newly described entity related to
Daley, T.D. and Wysocki, G.P. (1990). Foreign body gingivitis: an iat ligneous conjunctivitis. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 26 (2): 100–104.
rogenic disease? Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 69 (6):
708–712. Gordon, S. (2000). Foreign body gingivitis associated with a new
crown: EDX analysis and review of the literature. Oper. Dent. 25 (4):
Damm, D.D., Curran, A., White, D.K., and Drummond, J.F. (1999). 344–348.
Leukoplakia of the maxillary vestibule – an association with Viadent?
Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 87 (1): Gordon, S.C. and Daley, T.D. (1997). Foreign body gingivitis: identifica
61–66. tion of the foreign material by energy‐dispersive x‐ray microanalysis.
Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 83 (5):
Dibart, S. and Karima, M. (2006). Practical Periodontal Plastic 571–576.
Surgery. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing.
Gravitis, K., Daley, T.D., and Lochhead, M.A. (2005). Management of
Drew, H.J., Vogel, R.I., Molofsky, W. et al. (1987). Effect of folate on patients with foreign body gingivitis: report of 2 cases with histo
phenytoin hyperplasia. J. Clin. Periodontol. 14 (6): 350–356. logic findings. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 71 (2): 105–109.
Eisen, D. (2000). Disorders of pigmentation in the oral cavity. Clin. Gunhan, O., Gunhan, M., Berker, E. et al. (1999). Destructive mem
Dermatol. 18 (5): 579–587. branous periodontal disease (Ligneous periodontitis). J.
Periodontol. 70 (8): 919–925.
Eisen, D. (2002). The clinical features, malignant potential, and sys
temic associations of oral lichen planus: a study of 723 patients. Hansen, L.S., Olson, J.A., and Silverman, S. Jr. (1985). Proliferative
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 46 (2): 207–214. verrucous leukoplakia. A long‐term study of thirty patients. Oral
Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 60 (3): 285–298.
Eisen, D. and Voorhees, J.J. (1991). Oral melanoma and other pig
mented lesions of the oral cavity. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 24 (4): Hedin, C.A. (1977). Smoker’s melanosis. Arch. Dermatol. 113:
527–537. 1533–1538.
Elkhoury, J., Cacchillo, D.A., Tatakis, D.N. et al. (2004). Undifferentiated Hedin, C.A., Pindborg, J.J., and Axell, T. (1993). Disappearance of
malignant neoplasm involving the interdental gingiva: a case report. smoker’s melanosis after reducing smoking. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 22
J. Periodontol. 75 (9): 1295–1299. (5): 228–230.
Ellis, E. (2003). Principles of differential diagnosis and biopsy. In: Heinemann, C., Fischer, T., Barta, U. et al. (2006). Plasma cell mucosi
Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 4e (eds. L.J. tis with oral and genital involvement – successful treatment with topi
Peterson, E. Ellis III, J.R. Hupp and M.R. Tucker), 458–478. cal cyclosporin. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 20 (6): 739–740.
Philadelphia: Elsevier.
Hirshberg, A. and Buchner, A. (1995). Metastatic tumours to the oral
Eversole, L.R., Eversole, G.M., and Kopcik, J. (2000). Sanguinaria‐ region. An overview. Eur. J. Cancer B Oral Oncol. 31B (6): 355–360.
associated oral leukoplakia: comparison with other benign and
dysplastic leukoplakic lesions. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Huff, J.C., Weston, W.L., and Tonnesen, M.G. (1983). Erythema multi
Oral Radiol. Endod. 89 (4): 455–464. forme: a critical review of characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and
causes. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 8: 763–775.
Fatahzadeh, M. and Sirois, D.A. (2002). Multiple intraoral melanoacan‐
thomas: a case report with unusual findings. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Kataoka, M., Kido, J., Shinohara, Y., and Nagata, T. (2005). Drug‐
Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 94 (1): 54–56. induced gingival overgrowth – a review. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 28 (10):
1817–1821.
Ferlito, A. and Recher, G. (1980). Ackerman’s tumor (verrucous carci
noma) of the larynx: a clinicopathologic study of 77 cases. Cancer Kaur, C., Thami, G.P., Sarkar, R., and Kanwar, A.J. (2001). Plasma cell
46 (7): 1617–1630. mucositis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 15 (6): 566–567.
Kemp, S., Gallagher, G., and Kabani, S. (2005). Case report: oral Naudi, K.B., Hunter, K.D., MacDonald, D.G., and Felix, D.H. (2006).
involvement as an early manifestation of Wegener’s granulomato Ligneous alveolar gingivitis in the absence of plasminogen defi
sis. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 100 (2): 187. ciency. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 35 (10): 636–638.
Koch, B.B., Trask, D.K., Hoffman, H.T. et al. (2001). National survey of Navazesh, M. (1995). Tartar‐control toothpaste as a possible contrib
head and neck verrucous carcinoma: patterns of presentation, utory factor in the onset of superficial mucocele: a case report.
care, and outcome. Cancer 92 (1): 110–120. Spec. Care Dentist. 15 (2): 74–78.
Laskaris, G., Triantafyllou, A., and Economopoulou, P. (1988). Gingival Noonan, V., Kabani, S., and Gallagher, G. (2005). Recurrent intraoral
manifestations of childhood cicatricial pemphigoid. Oral Surg. Oral herpes infection. J. Mass. Dent. Soc. 53 (4): 55.
Med. Oral Pathol. 66 (3): 349–352.
Nxumalo, T.N. and Shear, M. (1992). Gingival cyst in adults. J. Oral
Macleod, R.I. and Ellis, J.E. (1989). Plasma cell gingivitis related to Pathol. Med. 21 (7): 309–313.
the use of herbal toothpaste. Br. Dent. J. 166 (10): 375–376.
Odessey, E.A., Cohn, A.B., Casper, F., and Schechter, L.S. (2006).
Magnusson, B.C. and Rasmusson, L.G. (1995). The giant cell fibroma. Hereditary gingival fibromatosis: aggressive 2‐stage surgical resec
A review of 103 cases with immunohistochemical findings. Acta tion in lieu of traditional therapy. Ann. Plast. Surg. 57 (5): 557–560.
Odontol. Scand. 53 (5): 293–296.
Palefsky, J.M., Silverman, S. Jr., Abdel‐Salaam, M. et al. (1995). Association
Manchanda, Y., Tejasvi, T., Handa, R., and Ramam, M. (2003). between proliferative verrucous leukoplakia and infection with human
Strawberry gingiva: a distinctive sign in Wegener’s granulomatosis. papillomavirus type 16. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 24 (5): 193–197.
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 49 (2): 335–337.
Patten, S.F. and Tomecki, K.J. (1993). Wegener’s granulomatosis:
Martin‐Granizo, R., Rodriguez‐Campo, F., Naval, L., and Diaz cutaneous and oral mucosal disease. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 28 (5
Gonzalez, F.J. (1997). Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in Pt 1): 710–718.
patients younger than 40 years. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 117
(3 Pt 1): 268–275. Patton, L.L., Brahim, J.S., and Baker, A.R. (1994). Metastatic malig
nant melanoma of the oral cavity. A retrospective study. Oral Surg.
Mavrogiannis, M., Ellis, J.S., Seymour, R.A., and Thomason, J.M. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 78 (1): 51–56.
(2006). The efficacy of three different surgical techniques in the
management of drug‐induced gingival overgrowth. J. Clin. Prasad, V.N., Chawla, H.S., Goyal, A. et al. (2004). Folic acid and phe
Periodontol. 33 (9): 677–682. nytoin induced gingival overgrowth – is there a preventive effect?
J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent. 22 (2): 82–91.
McCoy, J.M. and Waldron, C.A. (1981). Verrucous carcinoma of the
oral cavity. A review of forty‐nine cases. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Ramer, M. and Burakoff, R.P. (1997). Smoker’s melanosis. Report of a
Pathol. 52 (6): 623–629. case. N. Y. State Dent. J. 63 (8): 20–21.
McCulloch, C.A. (2004). Drug‐induced fibrosis: interference with the Ramon Ramirez, J., Seoane, J., Montero, J. et al. (2003). Isolated
intracellular collagen degradation pathway. Curr. Opin. Drug gingival metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma mimicking a
Discov. Devel. 7 (5): 720–724. pyogenic granuloma. J. Clin. Periodontol. 30 (10): 926–929.
Mealey, B.L. (2006). Periodontal disease and diabetes: a two‐way Reznik, D.A. (2005). Oral manifestations of HIV disease. Top. HIV
street. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 137 (Suppl 2): 26S–31S. Med. 13 (5): 143–148.
Medina, J.E., Dichtel, W., and Luna, M.A. (1984). Verrucous‐squamous Sanderson, R.J. and Ironside, J.A. (2002). Squamous cell carcinomas
carcinomas of the oral cavity. A clinicopathologic study of 104 of the head and neck. BMJ 325 (7368): 822–827.
cases. Arch. Otolaryngol. 110 (7): 437–440.
Schott, D., Dempfle, C.E., Beck, P. et al. (1998). Therapy with a puri
Mignogna, M.D., Lo Muzio, L., and Bucci, E. (2001). Clinical fea fied plasminogen concentrate in an infant with ligneous conjunctivi
tures of gingival pemphigus vulgaris. J. Clin. Periodontol. 28 (5): tis and homozygous plasminogen deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 339
489–493. (23): 1679–1686.
Mignogna, M.D., Lo Russo, L., and Fedele, S. (2005). Gingival involve Scully, C., Gokbuget, A.Y., Allen, C. et al. (2001). Oral lesions indica
ment of oral lichen planus in a series of 700 patients. J. Clin. tive of plasminogen deficiency (hypoplasminogenemia). Oral Surg.
Periodontol. 32 (10): 1029–1033. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 91 (3): 334–337.
Mirowski, G.W. and Waibel, J.S. (2002). Pigmented lesions of the oral Scully, C. and Porter, S. (2000). ABC of oral health. Oral cancer. BMJ
cavity. Dermatol. Therapy 15 (3): 218–228. 321 (7253): 97–100.
Musa, N.J., Kumar, V., Humphreys, L. et al. (2002). Oral pemphigoid Seoane, J., Varela‐Centelles, P.I., Walsh, T.F. et al. (2006). Gingival
masquerading as necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis in a child. J. squamous cell carcinoma: diagnostic delay or rapid invasion?
Periodontol. 73 (6): 657–663. J. Periodontol. 77 (7): 1229–1233.
Setterfield, J., Shirlaw, P.J., Kerr‐Muir, M. et al. (1998). Mucous mem Tokgoz, B., Sari, H.I., Yildiz, O. et al. (2004). Effects of azithromycin on
brane pemphigoid: a dual circulating antibody response with IgG cyclosporine‐induced gingival hyperplasia in renal transplant
and IgA signifies a more severe and persistent disease. Br. J. patients. Transplant. Proc. 36 (9): 2699–2702.
Dermatol. 138 (4): 602–610.
Treister, N.S., Magalnick, D., and Woo, S.B. (2004). Oral mucosal pig
Shade, N.L., Carpenter, W.M., and Delzer, D.D. (1987). Gingival cyst mentation secondary to minocycline therapy: report of two cases
of the adult. Case report of a bilateral presentation. J. Periodontol. and a review of the literature. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral
58 (11): 796–799. Radiol. Endod. 97 (6): 718–725.
Siegel, M.A. and Anhalt, G.J. (1993). Direct immunofluorescence of Umeda, M. and Shimada, K. (1994). Primary malignant melanoma of
detached gingival epithelium for diagnosis of cicatricial pemphigoid. the oral cavity – its histological classification and treatment. Br. J.
Report of five cases. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 75 (3): 296–302. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 32 (1): 39–47.
Silverman, S. Jr. and Gorsky, M. (1997). Proliferative verrucous leuko van der Waal, R.I., Buter, J., and van der Waal, I. (2003). Oral metas
plakia: a follow‐up study of 54 cases. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral tases: report of 24 cases. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 41 (1): 3–6.
Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 84 (2): 154–157.
Velegraki, A., Nicolatou, O., Theodoridou, M. et al. (1999). Paediatric
Sinha, A., Chander, J., and Natarajan, S. (2006). Erythema multiforme AIDS – related linear gingival erythema: a form of erythematous
presenting as chronic oral ulceration due to unrecognised herpes candidiasis? J. Oral Pathol. Med. 28 (4): 178–182.
simplex virus infection. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 31 (5): 737–738.
Wakahara, M., Kiyohara, T., Kumakiri, M. et al. (2005). Paraneoplastic
Sklavounou, A. and Laskaris, G. (1990). Childhood cicatricial pemphi pemphigus with widespread mucosal involvement. Acta Derm.
goid with exclusive gingival involvement. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Venereol. 85 (6): 530–532.
Surg. 19 (4): 197–199.
Walters, J.D., Will, J.K., Hatfield, R.D. et al. (2001). Excision and repair
Solomon, L.W., Aguirre, A., Neiders, M. et al. (2003). Chronic ulcerative of the peripheral ossifying fibroma: a report of 3 cases. J.
stomatitis: clinical, histopathologic, and immunopathologic findings. Periodontol. 72 (7): 939–944.
Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 96 (6): 718–726.
Weckx, L.L., Hidal, L.B., and Marcucci, G. (1990). Oral manifestations
Souza, L.B., Andrade, E.S., Miguel, M.C. et al. (2004). Origin of stel of leukemia. Ear Nose Throat J. 69 (5): 341–342, 345–346.
late giant cells in oral fibrous lesions determined by immunohisto
chemical expression of vimentin, HHF‐35, CD68 and factor XIIIa. Wiernik, P.H., De Bellis, R., Muxi, P., and Dutcher, J.P. (1996).
Pathology 36 (4): 316–320. Extramedullary acute promyelocytic leukemia. Cancer 78 (12):
2510–2514.
Spiro, R.H. (1998). Verrucous carcinoma, then and now. Am. J. Surg.
176 (5): 393–397. Wine, E., Ballin, A., and Dalal, I. (2006). Infantile erythema multiforme
following hepatitis B vaccine. Acta Paediatr. 95 (7): 890–891.
Spruance, S.L., Bodsworth, N., Resnick, H. et al. (2006). Single‐dose,
patient‐initiated famciclovir: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐ Wright, J.M. (1988). Intraoral melanoacanthoma: a reactive melano
controlled trial for episodic treatment of herpes labialis. J. Am. cytic hyperplasia. Case report. J. Periodontol. 59 (1): 53–55.
Acad. Dermatol. 55 (1): 47–53.
Yuan, K., Wing, L.Y., and Lin, M.T. (2002). Pathogenetic roles of angio
Tal, H., Oegiesser, D., and Tal, M. (2003). Gingival depigmentation by genic factors in pyogenic granulomas in pregnancy are modulated
erbium: YAG laser: clinical observations and patient responses. J. by female sex hormones. J. Periodontol. 73 (7): 701–708.
Periodontol. 74 (11): 1660–1667.
Zakrzewska, J.M. (1999). Fortnightly review: oral cancer. BMJ 318
Thornhill, M.H., Sankar, V., Xu, X.J. et al. (2006). The role of histo (7190): 1051–1054.
pathological characteristics in distinguishing amalgam‐associated
159
CONTRAINDICATIONS
• The presence of uncontrolled diabetes, immune dis
eases, or other contraindicating systemic conditions.
• Thrombocytopenia or allergically induced thrombocyto
penia (type II).
• Radiation therapy to the head and neck area in the
12 month period prior to proposed surgical treatment.
• Chemotherapy in the 12 month period prior to proposed
surgical treatment.
• An active sinus infection or a history of persistent sinus
infections.
• Hypersensitivity to bovine albumin, penicillin, gen
tamicin, amphotericin B.
• An excessive smoking habit.
Figure 11.1 Collection of a periosteal biopsy. Periosteal tissue was
• Alcohol and drug abuse. harvested from the goniac angle of the mandible.
• Physical and psychological handicaps.
• Pregnancy and lactating patients. relatively easy and not too invasive. After administering local
anesthesia, an intrasulcular or intravestibular incision parallel
ARMAMENTARIUM to the mucogingival junction is made using a #15 blade. The
incision on the buccal side of the first mandibular molar
1. For the harvesting procedure, a basic surgical kit such
should extend at least one and a half teeth toward the ante
as the one described in Practical Periodontal Plastic
rior and posterior in order to obtain sufficient access. A partial
Surgery and an osseous coagulum collector (Citagenix
thickness flap is elevated to expose the underlying perios
Inc., Quebec, Canada) can be used.
teum. After outlining the area with a #15 blade, the periosteal
2. For the sinus augmentation procedure, a basic surgical
biopsy (approximately 1 cm2) can be collected using a back
kit and the following can be used:
action chisel or osseous coagulum collector (see Figure 11.1).
• Angulated elevation instruments for separation of the
Alternatively, an alveolar bone biopsy (8x10x2mm) can be
Schneiderian membrane from the inner bony surface
taken from the same side or the tuberosity area after expos
of the maxillary sinus (Hu‐Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA)
ing the bone using a distal wedge incision. The collected
• CollaTape (Zimmer Dental, Carlsbad, CA, USA) tissue biopsy needs to be stored in appropriate sterile tissue
containers and transferred to an in vitro cell/tissue facility for
• Bio-Oss (Geistlich Pharma North America Inc.,
further culturing and tissue expansion. In addition, a blood
Princeton, NY, USA)
sample (approximately 126 ml of blood will be sufficient for 10
• Resorbable membrane: Bioguide (Geistlich Pharma tissue-engineered discs) needs to be taken from the patient.
North America Inc., Princeton, NY, USA); RCM (Bicon, This blood sample will be used to produce serum, which is
Boston, MA, USA) essential for future culturing of the isolated periosteal cells
(Schimming and Schmelzeisen 2004). The donor side can
be sutured with either resorbable (5‐0 chromic gut) or non‐
SINUS AUGMENTATION USING
resorbable (5‐0 silk) suture material.
TISSUE-ENGINEERED BONE DISCS
Technique Postoperative Management
Sinus augmentation using tissue‐engineered bone requires Pain medications should be prescribed as needed. In
two surgical procedures, harvesting and transplant implan addition, chlorhexidine rinses twice a day for 21 days start
tation surgery. ing 1 day after the surgery should be included in the post
operative regimen.
Harvesting Procedure
Treatment and Expansion of Periosteal Biopsies
Periosteal tissue can be obtained from several locations in
the oral cavity. However, access to the lateral cortex of the The periosteal tissue biopsy can be cultured using a tissue
mandibular body in the apical region of the first molar area is engineering protocol described by Schmelzeisen et al.
Figure 11.2 Tissue-engineered bone discs. (a) Discs were kept in transportation medium until implantation. (b) Scaffolds need to be carefully handled
so as not to destroy the incorporated cells.
(Schmelzeisen 2003). In addition, commercial companies Austria) in a 1 : 10 PBS dilution. The transplant discs are
such as Bio Tissue Technology, Freiburg, Germany offer to cultured for an additional week in DMEM/Ham’s supple
overtake laborious cell culturing and provide the clinician mented with 5% autologous serum, dexamethasone
with the finished tissue-engineered bone discs. 10‐7 Mol, β‐glycerophosphate 10 mM and ascorbic acid
(50 mg/l). At this point (approximately seven weeks after
The periosteum needs to be enzymatically digested to iso the harvesting procedure), the transplants are ready for
late progenitor cells. Collagenase CLSII (Clostridium histo- implantation. Each final disc contains around 1.5 × 106 cells
lyticum) at a concentration of 333 U/ml (Biochrom, and is circa 2 × 10 mm in size (see Figure 11.2a and b).
Cambridge, UK) in 1 : 1 DMEM/Ham’s F‐12 (Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’s medium, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA)
TRANSPLANT IMPLANTATION SURGERY
can be used and the resulting cell suspension needs to be
(SINUS AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE USING
washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Invitrogen,
TISSUE-ENGINEERED BONE DISCS)
Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells are counted using a hemocy
tometer and stained with trypan blue dye to determine the Prior to the sinus augmentation procedure, a computed
overall cell viability. Afterwards, they are resuspended in tomography (CT) scan or panoramic radiograph should
1 : 1 DMEM/Ham’s F‐12 supplemented with 10% autolo be taken from the selected area (Figure 11.4a). The
gous serum and seeded into cell cuture flasks. The flasks procedure can be performed under local anesthesia. A
are cultured in a cell culture incubator adjusted to 37 °C, mid-crestal incision is made with mesial and distal releas
3.5% CO2 and 95% humidity. The medium needs to be ing incisions extending well into the buccal fold. The
replaced every two days until cells reach a 70% conflu mucoperiosteal flap is reflected in a full thickness man
ency. At this point, cells are trypsinized (0.02%trypsin and ner and care needs to be taken to completely release the
0.02% EDTA in PBS) for five minutes and seeded at a den tissue for a tension‐free access to the lateral wall of the
sity of 5000/mm2. This step needs to be repeated four times maxillary sinus. There are three classical approaches to
to increase cell number. Following trypsinization, cells are enter the maxillary sinus. In the Caldwell Luc approach
now ready to be incorporated into the transplant discs the window is anterior to the zygomatic buttress, in a low
(Perka et al. 2000). Several scaffold materials such as syn position the window is situated next to the alveolar crest
thetic and natural polymers, composites, and ceramics and in a mid‐maxillary position the lateral window is situ
have been tested in recent years (Sittinger et al. 2004). ated between the alveolar crest and zygomatic buttress
They need to be biocompatible and resorbable to facilitate (Lazzara 1996; Summers 1994; Zitzmann and Scharer
integration of the future graft into an in vivo environment. To 1998). In the above introduced application, a lateral win
incorporate cells into the scaffold, cells are suspended dow approach is recommended. However, in any case,
in 1 : 1 DMEM/Ham’s and mixed with human fibrinogen the osteotomy window should be placed according to the
(TissueColl, Baxter Immuno, Austria) in a 3 : 1 ratio. The anatomical structure of the m
axillary sinus and its inferior
resulting cell solution is soaked into polymer fleeces (e.g. horizontal border should be 3–4 mm above the sinus
Ethicon, Cornelia, GA, USA) and subsequently polymerized floor. The oval window is outlined under continuous ster
by adding bovine thrombin (TissueColl, Baxter Immuno, ile saline irrigation with a highspeed handpiece and
(a) (c)
(b) (d)
Figure 11.3 Sinus augmentation using tissue‐engineered bone discs. (a) A lateral window was outlined to access the maxillary sinus. (b) The Schneiderian
membrane was elevated from its bony surface to create space for the augmentation material. (c and d) Tissue‐engineered bone discs were implanted into the
maxillary sinus. (e) The discs were covered with Bio-Oss (Osteohealth) augmentation material (optional). (f) The grafted area was covered with a resorbable
membrane (Bioguide, Osteohealth). (g) The flap was sutured in its original position with single interrupted sutures (Gortex, Gore Medical).
(g)
It also should be kept in mind that the ostium which rep #15 blade in order to facilitate a tension free closure. The
resents the connection in between the middle meatus of flap can now be sutured with either resorbable (such as
the nose and the maxillary sinus is approximately 25 mm Vicryl, Ethicon, Carnelia, GA, USA) or nonresorbable
above the floor of the sinus. A blockade due to extensive (such as Gortex suture, Gore Medical, Flagstaff, Arizona)
sinus grafting can result in a chronic infection of the max suture material in single interrupted sutures (see
illary sinus (Doud Galli et al. 2001). Figure 11.3g). Whenever necessary, these sutures can
be replaced by a continuous suture and further secured
Assuming that the membrane is elevated sufficiently, the with horizontal mattress sutures.
tissue‐engineered discs which can be kept in the trans
Postoperative Management
portation medium during the procedure are then inserted
into the sinus and gently packed until the space • Antibiotic therapy should be started the day before the
in between sinus membrane and bony walls of the sinus procedure: 500 mg amoxicillin three times daily for seven
is filled (see Figure 11.3c and d). In addition, bone days (300 mg clindamycin four times daily should be
augmentation material such as Bio-Oss (Osteohealth,
prescribed for penicillin sensitive patients)
Shirley, NY, USA) can be used as a protective layer on
• Analgesics: Acetaminophen + codeine (Tylenol #3) or
the outside of the graft (see Figure 11.3e). The window
ibuprofen (Motrin 600
mg) three times a day or as
should be covered with a membrane that overlaps
necessary.
its
outlines and therefore protects the grafted side.
Either a nonresorbable membrane with securing tacks • Anti‐inflammatories: Dexamethasone can be prescribed
or a resorbable one can be used for this purpose for five days in the following manner (day of surgery:
(see Figure 11.3f). Afterwards, the mucoperiosteal flap is 3.75 mg; day 2: 3 mg; day 3: 2.25 mg: day 4: 1.5 mg; day 5:
positioned back to cover the surgical site. It might be 0.75 mg). This will control the swelling and alleviate the
necessary to release the periosteum of the flap with a discomfort.
(d)
Figure 11.4 Radiographic evaluation of the grafted site. (a) A periapical radiograph was taken and revealed inadequate bone height prior to implant
placement. (b) Radiograph depicting the augmented site prior to implant placement. (c) Implant was placed successfully in the grafted site achieving
primary stability. (d) 10 year follow up. Graft material is still in place.
Figure 11.7 Material taken from the bone marrow through aspiration.
Figure 11.9 The stem cell-rich material is mixed with the xenograft
(Bio‐Oss).
Figure 11.11 The bone graft is delivered into the sinus with simultane-
ous implant placement.
aerobic and anaerobic cultures could be used as a sup Boyne, P.J. and James, R.A. (1980). Grafting of the maxillary sinus
portive adjunct to determine future treatment. Sometimes floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J. Oral Surg. 38 (8):
613–616.
local debridement is appropriate and sufficient. If the graft
needs to be completely removed, a long-lasting collagen Breitbach, A.S., Grande, D.A., Kessler, R. et al. (1998). Tissue engi
membrane should be used to cover the window. After a neered bone repair of calvarial defects using culture periosteal
healing period of three to four months, the site can be cells. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 101: 567–574.
re-entered for an additional grafting procedure. In response
Cammack, G.V. 2nd, Nevins, M., Clem, D.S. 3rd et al. (2005).
to an infection, oroantral fistulae can form which are treat
Histologic evaluation of mineralized and demineralized freeze‐
able with antibiotics and oral chlorhexidine rinses. dried bone allograft for ridge and sinus augmentations. Int. J.
Nevertheless, large and persistent fistulae require surgical Periodontics Restorative Dent. 25 (3): 231–237.
intervention. In case of a premature exposure of the mem
brane, it has been shown that oral bacteria can penetrate Charkawi, E., Hussein, G., Askary, E. et al. (2005). Endoscopic
removal of an implant from the maxillary sinus: a case report.
the membrane surface within four weeks (Simion et al.
Implant Den. 14 (1): 30–35.
1994). Thus, it is advised to continue the use of chlorhex
idine mouth rinses until the final implant surgery. In any Davarpanah, M., Martinez, H., Tecucianu, J.F. et al. (2001). The modi
case, the patient should be closely followed in order to fied osteotome technique. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 21
intervene if an infection develops and the membrane (6): 599–607.
needs to be removed.
Doud Galli, S.K., Lebowitz, R.A., Giacchi, R.J. et al. (2001). Chronic
sinusitis complicating sinus lift surgery. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 15
Taken together, infection should be treated in a compre (3): 181–186.
hensive way to minimize the risk of spreading and maxi
mize the success of the grafting procedure. Duttenhoefer, F., Hieber, S.F., Stricker, A. et al. (2014 Apr 1).
Follow‐up of implant survival comparing ficoll and bone marrow
aspirate concentrate methods for hard tissue regeneration with
REFERENCES mesenchymal stem cells in humans. Biores Open Access 3 (2):
Arnold, U., Lindenhayn, K., and Perka, C. (2002). In vitro‐cultivation of 75–76.
human periosteum derived cells in bioresorbable polymer‐TCP‐
composites. Biomaterials 23: 2303–2310. Froum, S.J., Tarnow, D.P., Wallace, S.S. et al. (1998). Sinus floor eleva
tion using anorganic bovine bone matrix (OsteoGraf/N) with and
Berengo, M., Sivolella, S., Majzoub, Z., and Cordioli, G. (2004). without autogenous bone: a clinical, histologic, radiographic, and
Endoscopic evaluation of the bone‐added osteotome sinus floor histomorphometric analysis‐‐part 2 of an ongoing prospective
elevation procedure. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 33 (2): study. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 18 (6): 528–543.
189–194.
Fugazzotto, P.A. and De Paoli, S. (2002). Sinus floor augmentation
Block, M.S. and Kent, J.N. (1997). Sinus augmentation for dental at the time of maxillary molar extraction: success and failure rates
implants: the use of autogenous bone. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 55 of 137 implants in function for up to 3 years. J. Periodont. 73 (1):
(11): 1281–1286. 39–44.
Perka, C., Schultz, O., Spitzer, R.S. et al. (2000). Segmental bone repair Vercellotti, T., De Paoli, S., and Nevins, M. (2001). The piezoelectric
by tissue‐engineered periosteal cell transplants with bioresorbable bony window osteotomy and sinus membrane elevation: intro
fleece and fibrin scaffolds in rabbits. Biomaterials 21 (11): 1145–1153. duction of a new technique for simplification of the sinus augmen
tation procedure. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 21 (6):
Pikos, M.A. (1996). Chin grafts as donor sites for maxillary bone 561–567.
augmentation‐‐part II. Dent. Implant. Update 7 (1): 1–4.
Wheeler, S.L. (1997). Sinus augmentation for dental implants: the
Risbud, M. (2001). Tissue engineering: implications in the treatment use of alloplastic materials. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 55 (11):
of organ and tissue defects. Biogerontology 2: 117–125. 1287–1293.
Schimming, R. and Schmelzeisen, R. (2004). Tissue‐engineered bone Zimbler, M.S., Lebowitz, R.A., Glickman, R. et al. (1998). Antral aug
for maxillary sinus augmentation. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 62 (6): mentation, osseointegration, and sinusitis: the otolaryngologist’s
724–729. perspective. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 12 (5): 311–316.
Schmelzeisen, R., Schimming, R., and Sittinger, M. (2003). Making Zitzmann, N.U. and Scharer, P. (1998). Sinus elevation procedures
bone: implant insertion into tissue‐engineered bone for maxillary in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and
sinus floor augmentation‐a preliminary report. J. CranioMaxillofac. lateral approaches. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol.
Surg. 31: 34–39. Endod. 85 (1): 8–17.
INTRODUCTION
contour, color, and texture surrounding the implant while
When considering implant therapy in the esthetic zone,
the white focuses on the implant supported crown.
replicating the natural soft tissue frame may present chal-
Objective assessment criteria have been introduced in the
lenges for the treating clinician. A harmonious gingival
literature (PES/WES) in an attempt to standardize how
form and architecture are not only fundamental for ade-
clinicians and researchers evaluate the esthetics of implant
quate peri‐implant pink esthetics but also for simulating a
supported restorations. For anterior implant therapy, evalu-
natural emergence for the future restoration. When dealing
ation of both the pink and white esthetics is imperative, and
with clinical situations in which adequate tissue architec-
consequently surgical therapy should be geared toward
ture and volume are present, preserving or further
optimizing functional and biological outcomes without
enhancement of the available support may provide an
neglecting the esthetic component. This chapter will focus
improved esthetic outcome with less associated morbidity
on management and correction of deficient sites through
and treatment duration. Nevertheless, reconstruction of
combined hard and soft tissue volume augmentation pro-
atrophic sites due to lost hard and soft tissue volume is
cedures to offer improved peri‐implant pink esthetics and
often inevitable in the anterior zone, which may necessi-
functional long‐term outcomes (Figure 12.2).
tate more complex grafting procedures with varying
degrees of predictability in achieving ideal peri‐implant TISSUE VOLUME AVAILABILITY
soft tissues. This chapter will highlight clinical scenarios AND REQUIREMENTS
and evidence‐based treatment of cases in which the lack
of hard and soft tissue volume poses difficulty in achieving Preservation of the existing architecture of the soft tissues
optimal peri‐implant esthetics. Contemporary clinical strat- prior to tooth extraction offers clinicians a simple method
egies and minimally invasive techniques will also be dis- of obtaining a more “natural” appearance of the final
cussed in order to provide clinicians with different options implant restoration. The soft tissue “curtain” that sur-
to better manage hard and soft tissue deficiencies when rounds implant supported crowns requires sufficient,
dealing with implant therapy in the esthetic zone. three‐dimensional hard and soft tissue volume to attain a
long‐term stable result. Unfortunately, the tissue volume
requirements for dental implants is often more than what is
THE INFLUENCE OF TISSUE VOLUME
needed for maintenance of the natural dentition.
ON THE PERI‐IMPLANT “PINK” ESTHETICS
Consequently, preservation of the tissue architecture
Solely relying on objective criteria for osseointegration and alone following tooth extraction may not always be ade-
functional aspects of dental implants may not be sufficient quate to maintain tissue stability around the future implant
in modern day implant dentistry. Esthetics and patient‐ and thus additional soft and hard tissue augmentation is
centered outcomes have evolved to become integral com- often required. Spray and colleagues (2000) demon-
ponents of our daily practice, especially in the esthetic strated the importance of sufficient buccal bone in implant
zone. The clinician must consider that esthetics are also dentistry. It was found that when the bone buccal to an
highly subjective and should be suited towards providing implant fixture was less than 1.8 mm, bone remodeling
treatment that is tailored to each individual patient depend- and possible implant dehiscence was observed at the
ing on their particular situation (Figure 12.1). time of second stage uncovering. Other authors have
corroborated these findings with recommendations of a
Implant esthetics can be further segmented into pink and minimum of 2 mm of bone buccal to the implant with a
white esthetics. The “pink” refers to the soft tissue form, range of 2–4 mm (Grunder 2000, 2011) for maintenance of
169
Figure 12.1 Triad of contemporary implant dentistry (Buser et al. 2017; Linkevicius et al. 2009).
Figure 12.2 : Pink and white esthetic score. (a) Mesial Papilla. (b) Distal Papilla. (c) Soft tissue level. (d) Soft tissue color, texture, and curvature. White
esthetic Score. (e) Tooth Form. (f) Tooth Outline. (g) Surface texture. (h) Color. (i) Translucency (Tettamanti et al. 2016).
Figure 12.3 (a) Implant placement in an upper central incisor area. (b) Note the gray shadow of the implant fixture apparent through the thin buccal
bone. (c) Buccal bone thickness less than 1 mm will possess minimal vascularity and is highly susceptible to further resorption following implant
placement or loading. (d) Buccal veneer grafting to compensate for the remodeling of the thin buccal plate.
the peri‐implant crestal bone levels and long term tissue bone integrity and avoiding visibility of the implant
stability (Figures 12.3 and 12.4). restorative components. Owing to its reduced vascularity
and cellular content, thin peri‐implant mucosa has
With regards to the soft tissue demands, 2–3 mm of facial reduced resistance to bacterial plaque and subsequently,
peri‐implant soft tissue thickness has been shown to have peri‐implant disease. Soft tissue recession may then result
a protective function (Figure 12.5), maintain the underlying in “show through” of the underlying implant restorative
Figure 12.4 (a) Buccal veneer grafting performed at the time of implant placement with a xenograft material to further augment the buccal contour.
(b) Grafting of more than 4 mm buccal to the anticipated implant position to compensate for remodeling of the bone graft material. (c) Utilizing a
non‐resorbable membrane to shape the bone graft to the desired ridge shape.
(a) (b)
Figure 12.5 (a and b) Robust buccal volume augmentation following combined connective tissue grafting and dual zone protocols to simulate a natural
emergence of the final restoration and mask any show‐through of the abutment material.
Figure 12.6 (a) Clinical situation following bone and soft tissue augmentation at the time of implant placemen (b) Note the bone graft particles
encapsulated within the soft tissue. (c) Occlusal view of the final abutment in place.
Dentogingival
fibers
Implant
Figure 12.9 Schematic illustrating the differences between the peri‐implant and periodontal attachment. Note the perpendicular orientation of the
periodontal attachment which creates a protective barrier from physical and bacterial insults in addition to support of the supra‐crestal tissue. The
difference in fibers orientation histologically contributes to the difference in macroanatomy of the peri‐implant papilla and gingiva.
but by the presence of the supra‐crestal periodontal fib- and facial tissue recession exposing the underlying
ers on the adjacent teeth. It has been further shown in restorative components. If the level of the gingival margin
recent literature that the papillary height in sites of mul- in relation to the adjacent teeth and in relation to the final
tiple adjacent missing teeth is significantly less than implant supported restoration is located apically to the
when the tooth is present. Therefore, the periodontal contralateral tooth, it may be prudent for the clinician to
integrity and height of bone on the adjacent teeth consider soft tissue grafting either before tooth extraction
become a key determinant in the final esthetics of the or at any time point prior to finalization of the prosthetic
implant supported restoration. In the presence of perio- procedures to compensate for these discrepancies
dontal pathology, or interproximal attachment loss on (Figure 12.11).
the adjacent teeth, interdisciplinary techniques such as
orthodontic extrusion or changes to the tooth shape by Root Angulation/Inclination and its
restorative means may then be required to compensate Relationship to the Apical Bone Topography
for deficiencies in the interproximal papillary area
Kan (Kan et al. 2011) classified sagittal tooth positions
(Figure 12.9).
on CT scans to evaluate the viability of immediate implant
placement in fresh extraction sockets based on different
Consequently, a comprehensive periodontal evaluation,
tooth inclination patterns (Figure 12.12). Sagittal tooth
radiographic analysis, and bone sounding are essential
position may facilitate or hinder implant placement in the
diagnostic factors prior to tooth extraction in order to
correct three‐dimensional restorative driven position.
anticipate the final outcome and diagnose any deficien-
Since the objective is to place the implant in a more pala-
cies that may be present. Furthermore, the clinician must
tal position, a buccal tooth position may offer a more
be cognizant of any mesio‐distal tooth mal‐positioning
favorable situation due to the increased available palatal
and/or root proximity that may render the interdental bone
bone for implant anchorage. If the tooth occupies most
more susceptible to resorption. The choice of flap reflec-
of the socket as in class IV or if there is inadequate
tion and design may also be modified in an attempt to
apical bone to engage the implant, this may dictate
avoid stripping of the periosteum and blood supply overly-
additional hard tissue augmentation prior to implant
ing thin (<1.5 mm) or compromised inter‐radicular bone.
placement. The results of Kan studies have shown that
most of the anterior teeth lie in the class II and III catego-
Integrity of the Buccal Plate of Bone
ries, meaning that the tooth is either in the center of the
Conebeam CT scan, clinical periodontal evaluation, and socket or the root apex is angled toward the palatal
bone sounding are combined to ascertain the integrity and aspect. These positions consequently create difficulties
level of the buccal plate prior to extraction (Figure 12.10). in placement of immediate implants in a more palatal
Compromise in the buccal plate integrity can ultimately position to facilitate a palatal screw retained access.
yield to collapse of the tissue in the bucco‐lingual aspect Consequently, an angled screw channel may be utilized
yielding to an unesthetic implant supported restoration should a screw retained restoration be desired or the
(b) (d)
Figure 12.10 (a–d) Pre‐operative assessment of the interproximal height of bone through bone sounding of the tooth to be extracted as well as adjacent
dentition to determine the integrity of the periodontal attachment prior to flap reflection.
(a) (b)
Figure 12.11 (a) Pre‐operative bone sounding of the buccal plate reveals probing depths in excess of 10 mm. (b) Intra‐surgical view showing complete
absence of the buccal plate.
TISSUE AUGMENTATION AT THE TIME placed in the desired, restoratively driven position. Should
OF TOOTH EXTRACTION there be anatomical deficiencies or inadequate access to
achieve the desired therapeutic goal, alternative incision
Following pre‐operative assessment, management of the
designs/approaches can be utilized to allow for better
extraction socket now becomes the focus. As a general
access and augmentation while preserving the tissue
rule, the clinician should attempt every effort to minimize
architecture (further discussed in the chapter). N.B.
invasion and morbidity to the patient. Intact sites or sites
Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets does not
with minimal tissue deficiencies should be treated by
prevent subsequent bone remodeling (Araujo et al. 2005),
trying to preserve as much of the available support as pos-
which further highlights the importance of bone augmenta-
sible with minimal disruption of the tissue architecture,
tion at the time of implant placement (Figure 12.13). It is at
while sites with extensive deficiencies may necessitate
the clinician’s discretion and skill set to incorporate soft
further corrective procedures.
tissue grafting with conventional ridge preservation proce-
dure in order to further develop the tissue volume and
Salama and Salama (1993) reported on different types of
simplify following implant procedures.
extraction sites in the anterior zone with recommended
extraction site management protocols. Tarnow (in Chu
et al. 2012) added a modification to the type II deficiencies Treatment Options for Class I Extraction Sockets
for the clinician to better assess the severity of the buccal Immediate implant placement in conjunction with:
dehiscence present at the time of tooth extraction.
Depending on the degree of involvement of the extraction • Placement of a bone graft material in the gap between
socket, the approach utilized by the clinician should allow the implant and the buccal plate.
for the best result both functionally and esthetically with the
least tissue distortion. • Soft tissue graft (either free or pediculated).
• Partial Extraction Therapy (i.e. Socket Shield Technique).
Class I sockets have been identified as intact sockets.
Those display no or minimal reduction (i.e. < 3 mm) of the All of the following options can be performed with immedi-
buccal bone height with healthy interproximal attachment ate implant non‐functional provisionalization, customizable
levels, and no marginal tissue recession. Class I sockets healing abutments, or if inadequate implant stability is
may be present in either thick or thin gingival biotype situ- achieved a fixed tooth supported provisional with ovate
ations. Should the patient have a thin tissue biotype, soft pontic design may be utilized. Tissue borne provisional
tissue augmentation may be often mandated either at the prostheses are not recommended during the early healing
time of tooth extraction or at second stage procedure. period as continuous micro‐motion and pressure may have
a negative impact on the underlying soft tissues and
In class I sockets a minimally invasive flapless approach implant integration. Utilizing fixed prosthetic appliances
can be utilized for both immediate implant placement and adds a benefit of capturing the present soft tissue scallop
any simultaneous grafting provided that the implant is of the interproximal papillae.
(d) (e)
Figure 12.13 (a–e) Immediate implant placement performed following extraction of the maxillary bicuspid. Note the bucco‐lingual reduction in ridge
volume following tooth extraction and implant placement, despite grafting of the residual gap surrounding the implant. Further soft tissue augmentation
can be utilized to enhance the bucco‐lingual contour following implant integration.
Figure 12.14 Clinical example of immediate implant placement in a class II extraction socket utilizing an open approach.
Combined hard
Hard tissue and soft tissue
preservation only ridge
augmentation
Figure 12.15 Clinical example of Class II socket. Severe compromise of the buccal plate of the socket is noted with intact interproximal bone peaks.
Last picture showing immediate post‐extraction implant placement within the alveolar envelope of the socket.
extrusion of the teeth to optimize the tissue architecture Atraumatic Tooth Extraction
followed by implant placement or simply relying on restor-
Procedure:
ative techniques to replicate the deficient soft tissues.
Immediate implant placement in these cases is not advis-
See Figure 12.16.
able, but procedures to maximize tissue volume preser-
vation at the time of extraction should be followed. These
1. Elevation of the tooth and luxation should be performed
procedures will be discussed throughout this chapter.
on all aspects except for the buccal to avoid damage to
MANAGEMENT OF CLASS I SOCKETS the buccal plate or greenstick fracture.
Tissue Architecture Preservation 2. If the tooth is not easily luxated due to an intact perio-
dontium or curvatures in the root, sectioning of the root
Flapless techniques in implant therapy have been shown to may be performed utilizing a surgical length fissure car-
yield minimal tissue alterations. Techniques to capture the bide bur or long‐shanked diamond bur. This allows the
pre‐operative soft tissue frame immediately following tooth operator to reach the apex of the tooth and create room
removal whether through immediate implant provisional for the root fragments to be luxated within the socket.
restorations, customized healing abutments, or even ovate Sectioning can be performed in a mesio‐distal or
pontics allow for better preservation of the soft tissue frame. bucco‐lingual direction, taking care not to injure the sur-
The first step in preservation of the hard and soft tissue is rounding socket walls (Figure 12.17).
atraumatic extraction utilizing appropriate instrumentation.
3. Mesio‐distal and rotational movements should be
ARMAMENTARIUM directed vertically to avoid fracture of the buccal plate.
• Basic Surgical Kit. N.B. Direction of elevation should never be toward the
buccal aspect.
• Periotomes, Extraction Forceps, and Luxating Elevators.
Following delivery of the tooth, thorough debridement of
• Piezosurgical unit with Periotome Inserts.
the socket should be performed to prevent any soft tissue
• Implant Placement Kit. encapsulation of the bone substitute material and/or
implant. This can be accomplished through the use of
• Micro‐blades and Soft Tissue Tunneling
spoon curettes or through rotary finishing diamonds or
Instrumentation.
carbides with irrigation. De‐epithelialization of the internal
• Micro tissue forceps, Castro Viejo and Scissors. lining of the socket allows for fresh connective tissue for
Figure 12.16 (a and b) Separation of the supra‐crestal fibers with a micro‐blade in order facilitate tooth luxation and instrumentation through the sulcus
prior to tooth extraction.
(c)
(a)
(d)
(b)
Figure 12.17 (a and b) Long shanked diamond needle bur is utilized initiate the sectioning process through utilizing the root canal as a starting point.
The bur is advanced apically just beyond the tooth apex and the tooth is sectioned mesio‐distally utilizing the root canal as the guide for the long axis of
the sectioning process. (c) The mesial and distal walls of the tooth are thinned but not completely separated to protect the adjacent bone walls from injury.
Complete separation of the root fragments may be completed delicately with the bur or manually with a small luxating elevator. (d) Removal of the palatal
root fragment allows room to deliver the buccal portion of the root without risk of injuring the buccal plate.
(a)
Figure 12.21 In class I (Kan) sockets, placing implants in the space occupied by the root will result in an implant that is positioned too facial.
Subsequently, in order to take advantage of the available palatal bone, the osteotomy has to be initiated in a more palatal position. (a and b) This can be
done by utilizing a round bur about 4 mm from the apex of the socket. The round bur is taken to a depth sufficient to have a ledge created to stabilize the
pilot drill. Not having a deep enough or wide enough osteotomy for the pilot drill, will result in continuous slippage into the socket space which can result
in loss of part of the bone that is critical for implant stability. (c) Picture shows the implant osteotomy (palatal) versus the buccal socket position, showing
how the implant osteotomy is entirely in the palatal bone which was made possible as a result of the buccal tooth position. (d) The implant diameter
utilized allows a 2–3 mm gap between the buccal plate and the implant platform to allow adequate room for graft material introduction.
(a) (c)
(b) (d)
Figure 12.23 Implant depth can be measured utilizing different clinical indicators. (a) Utilizing the gingival margin of the future restoration, only
possible in flapless procedures. (b and c) During flap reflection, the CEJs of the adjacent teeth can be used as a reference for implant placement depth.
(d) Surgical guides that are accurately fabricated to give the clinician an accurate indicator upon implant drilling and final placement (Funato et al. 2007).
compared to xenografts. However, a low turnover material graft may also act as a protective barrier for the underlying
may be of benefit in the esthetic zone as it offers less bone material and/or implant.
remodeling which provides more long term contour
maintenance.
RATIONALE
After selection of the appropriate graft material, soft tissue Spontaneous healing and epithelialization of the extraction
grafting should be considered. This may be done simulta- site orifice usually occurs over a period of three to five
neously with both implant placement and bone grafting or weeks. However, when site preservation procedures are
just with socket grafting as a form of hard and soft tissue employed, the bone graft is left exposed to the oral cavity
volume preservation/augmentation to compensate for the and is subjected to external contaminants and risk of early
expected post‐extraction remodeling of the site. The tissue dislodgment. Therefore, a physical barrier may be
Figure 12.24 From left to right columns: (a–c) Atraumatic extraction of upper central incisors. (d–f) Socket degranulation and grafting performed up to
the soft tissue margins of the socket. (g–i) Native collagen membranes were utilized over the socket orifice and sealed over with a fixed provisional
restoration.
Requirements for the Tissue/Tissue
Substitute Material
• The tissue should be slightly larger than the socket ori-
fice to allow for intimate fit between the socket walls and
the graft.
• Graft should be resistant to infection and early resorption.
• The thickness of the graft should allow sufficient surface
Figure 12.25 Five months follow-up of both volume and soft tissue
area for vascular connections to prevent early tissue
scalloped architecture preservation by combining minimal trauma with the
necrosis. The tissue should rest passively in a stable
provisional restoration to maintain the soft tissue architecture and volume
position overlying the bone graft and in contact with the
for future implant placement.
soft tissue walls of the socket.
a free gingival graft and then de‐epithelialized outside, or as Recipient Site Preparation
a sub‐epithelial connective tissue graft from the deeper lay-
ers of the palate. The tissue graft may be utilized to augment Simplicity of the recipient site is one of the advantages of
the buccal tissue contours as well as seal over the extraction the socket seal technique.
socket. In cases where an immediate implant supported
supra‐structure is going to occupy the socket orifice, then the De‐epithelialization of the internal socket lining is the critical
tissue graft may be placed solely on the buccal aspect. A step to this procedure, in order to remove the sulcular/
final treatment option could be simply performing a socket pocket epithelium and allow access to the underlying con-
seal procedure, in which the tissue graft or tissue substitute nective tissue and vasculature. Due to the fact that the con-
material is utilized to cover solely the extraction socket orifice. nective tissue bed is circumferential in nature and does not
This technique provides protection of the underlying bone offer a great amount of vascularity underlying the graft it is
graft and preservation of the underlying osseous tissue prudent to avoid any interference of the lining epithelium
volume but has the least soft tissue volume enhancement with the donor tissue to maximize blood vessel anastomosis
effects when compared to other techniques. Specific advan- and organic union between the donor and recipient bed.
tages and disadvantages of each technique will be dis-
cussed further in the following paragraphs. De‐epithelialization can be performed with:
• Edentulous Ridge Spans socket. However, this is not always possible as in sites of
bicuspids and canines the socket orifice is not an even
• Collagen Based Tissue Substitute Materials
circle. At this point the clinician has to harvest a graft with
the aid of a template to satisfy the dimensional require-
A template may be used to allow accurate dimensions in
ments to seal the socket.
harvesting the graft. Utilizing a soft tissue punch of similar
dimensions as the internal aspect of the socket offers an
Stabilization of the Graft
easier and faster harvest of the graft. The tissue is har-
vested in a full thickness fashion through blunt dissection The focus in stabilization of any graft is immobilization of
using a periosteal elevator. Following which, hemostasis the free tissue to allow for a stable scaffold conducive to
can be achieved with the aid of a collagen sponge or sim- cellular migration and union of the graft to the recipient
ply cyanoacrylate or a periodontal dressing over the site. Regardless of the material or technique employed the
exposed donor site. end result must always be a stable graft with minimal
trauma. A clinical tip to assess graft stability is to place the
Tuberosity tissue has the advantage of higher collagen graft in the position and assess both the lateral extensions
content and dense connective tissue when compared to of the graft as well as the vertical alignment with the adja-
the lateral palate. This may be beneficial for pontic sites cent soft tissue margins. The graft should rest passively in
or for tissue augmentation around dental implants due contact with the adjacent soft tissue margins laterally and
to the absence of excessive glandular and adipose at a vertical level corresponding with the surrounding gin-
tissue. gival margins.
Immediate implant placement in the extraction socket with The most common technique to stabilize a graft uses 6–8
a healing abutment that occupies most of the socket interrupted microsutures with 6–0 or 7–0 filaments with a
space requires a different approach other than a Free microneedle. These sutures are placed in a and circum-
Gingival Graft (FGG) for sealing the socket as the abut- ferential, opposing manner to allow for even tension over
ment impedes the blood supply necessary for the future the graft and intimate, uniform contact of the graft to the
graft. donor tissue. Utilizing a microsuture filament and needle
offers the added benefit of minimizing trauma of the graft
The soft tissue punch may be taken as a preformed tissue while placing multiple sutures in close proximity to each
punch corresponding in diameter to the extracted tooth other.
Figure 12.27 (a–d) Immediate implant placement was combined with bone grafting of the residual gap surrounding the implant. A socket seal approach
was utilized to seal the extraction site. Note the adaptation of the graft to the surrounding soft tissue margins. Lower pictures show the donor and recipient
sites at immediate post‐op (e), one week (f) and two weeks (g) intervals.
Figure 12.28 From left to right. Suture entry point: The needle is advanced within the thickness of the graft. This suture is an internal horizontal mattress
suture that helps adapt the connective tissue aspects of the graft to the recipient site to enhance early revascularization.
The use of tissue adhesives may be used in lieu of multi- Disadvantages of This Technique
ple sutures to aid in graft stability while avoiding exces-
The main disadvantage of the socket seal FGG is that there
sive trauma from the suture needle. N.B. tissue adhesives
is no true augmentation of the buccal tissue volume which
may not be used as the sole method of graft stabilization
is critical around implants for esthetic purposes and long
in this technique, but as a supplemental method to
term stability of the underlying buccal bone. This issue may
reduce the number of sutures needed to fixate the graft
be overcome at the time of implant placement and/or sec-
in place.
ond stage uncovering of the implant by either utilizing the
tissue previously augmented on the occlusal aspect and
A compressive suture as demonstrated in Figure 12.27
introducing it onto the buccal aspect or by adding a con-
offers the advantage of additional graft compression in
nective tissue graft at the time of implant placement:
both lateral and vertical directions. This suture is useful in
cases where the graft is is too small or too thin, as stretch-
• The predictability of the graft taking is low
ing the graft in opposing directions may result in a dead
space apical to the graft. • Technique sensitive
In addition to a compressive suture, utilizing an internal To overcome these disadvantages a partially de‐epithelial-
mattress suture aids in stabilization and adapting the graft ized free gingival graft or sub‐epithelial connective tissue
to the internal socket lining (Figure 12.28). graft may be utilized (Figure 12.29). The following
Figure 12.31 Immediate implant placement with connective tissue grafting augmenting both the buccal aspect of the soft tissue as well as sealing the
socket. Post‐op two years follow-up showing gingival marginal stability around the implant restoration.
• At least 3–5 mm of the graft should be covered by the If buccal plate dehiscences are present, the dimensions
palatal tissue. of the graft may be modified to allow the graft borders to
rest on sound bone margins whenever possible
• Width is determined by the mesio‐distal width of the
(Figure 12.32).
extraction orifice.
Recipient Site Preparation tissue in order not to overly thin the buccal tissue or perfo-
rate it which could result in decreased vascularity to the
It is important to note that the buccal plate of anterior denti-
soft tissue graft and subsequent tissue necrosis
tion is less than 1 mm in thickness in the majority of maxil-
(Figure 12.33).
lary anterior sites and is consequently devoid of any
cancellous or marrow components. This translates into
minimal vascularity to the buccal cortical bone which is Requirements of Tunnel Preparation
further compromised by severing the periodontal ligament • The tunnel should be performed in a single plane of dis-
attachment upon tooth removal and micro‐fractures that section to allow for passive introduction of the graft.
can occur during tooth luxation. Therefore, in cases with
intact or minimally involved sockets, it may prudent to • Usually the extension of the tunnel should be larger than
avoid flap reflection as excessive tissue manipulation can the tissue to be harvested by 2 mm circumferentially.
result in tissue distortion, scarring, and recession that is • Ensure adequate tunnel extension to avoid ischemia of
less forgiving in the esthetic zone. Subsequently tunneling the buccal tissue and subsequent flap necrosis.
procedures have been introduced and further developed
to offer a less invasive approach for tissue reconstruction N.B. over-extension of the tunnel can compromise the sta-
in more sensitive and esthetic sites. The tunnel preparation bility of the grafted tissue, leading to inadequate vasculari-
can be initiated either from a crestal (sulcular) or vestibular zation and integration of the graft. This can be overcome
approach, depending on the ease of access and desired with additional stabilizing sutures to immobilize the graft.
area to be regenerated. The vestibular approach was
introduced as a submarginal incision. Modifications have If the tissue allows, the graft may be introduced with the
been proposed for vestibular access for horizontal ridge aid of the tunneling instruments or serrated tissue packers;
augmentation in the esthetic zone without affecting the soft however, this may not be always possible as it depends on
tissue architecture and avoiding visible scarring in patients the consistency and thickness of the graft. If the graft is too
with a high smile line (Dibart et al. 2009; Nevins et al. 2009a; thick, or is high in adipose contents, it can be often hard to
Zadeh 2011). The same approach may be utilized for both manipulate. In such cases the use of anchoring sutures
hard and soft tissue augmentation. can aid the clinician in guiding, positioning, and adapting
the tissue graft within the tunnel.
Tunnel Preparation
The plane of dissection may be performed in either a supra- Suturing Techniques
or sub‐periosteal fashion. If the purpose of the procedure
• Apical guiding “marionette” suture
is hard tissue augmentation, then it is necessary to per-
form a sub‐periosteal tunnel to avoid soft tissue ingrowth • Horizontal adaptive mattress suture
into the graft material. For soft tissue augmentation proce-
• Positioning mattress sutures
dures, supra‐periosteal dissection is advocated but should
be avoided in thin biotype cases to prevent excessive thin- The purpose of these techniques is to aid in navigating the
ning of the outer flap and compromising the blood supply tissue graft to its desired position within the prepared tunnel.
to the grafted tissue. This requires specialized, sharp tun- Appropriate selection of the suture needle and material are
neling instruments and micro‐blades that allow maneuver- critical, as this suture will be pulling the graft through an
ing over the convexity of the buccal plate. The tip of the entry point that could be narrower than some aspects of the
instrument should be aimed toward the bone and not the graft.
Figure 12.33 (a) Atraumatic extraction of the lateral incisor. (b) The buccal plate integrity is inspected. (c) Immediate implant placement is performed in
a flapless approach. (d) Note the contra‐angles in the tunneling instrument that facilitates by‐pass of the buccal plate, while still having the tip of the
instrument toward the bone to decrease the incidence of perforation of the buccal soft tissue. (e) The same tunneling instrument is inserted into the tunnel
to provide the space necessary for graft introduction. (f and g) Connective tissue graft insertion into the tunnel with the aid of a guiding suture (h) The
palatal portion of the connective tissue graft is left unsecured until the bone grafting procedure is complete. (i) Final suturing from apical to coronal:
Guiding suture, horizontal mattress suture, and final criss‐cross suture.
Figure 12.34 Apical guiding suture for introduction of the connective tissue graft into the prepared soft tissue tunnel. An instrument is utilized to keep
the suture taut and guide the graft in place from the other aspect.
Figure 12.35 From left to right, step by step procedure for the apical guiding suture for introduction of the graft into the apical aspect of the tunnel.
Depending on the desired area of graft insertion, the buccal purchase points are initiated at that level.
Figure 12.36 Two positioning mattress sutures are utilized to precisely position the graft at the mesial and distal aspects of the implant. The sutures
offer an anti‐rotational factor to the soft tissue graft and it is beneficial when utilized with longer grafts to be able to better position the tissue in the desired
location at different sites.
Figure 12.37 (a) Palatal placement. (b) Connective tissue graft placement and internal mattress positioning sutures. (c) Bone grafting was performed up
to the level of the soft tissue margin. (d) A provisional restorarion was utilized to prosthetically seal the socket.
free end of the graft and adapt it underneath the palatal for implant placement in conjunction with hard and soft
tissue. Reflection of the palatal tissue is often necessary to tissue augmentation.
allow adequate room for the graft (Figure 12.38).
FLAPLESS RIDGE PRESERVATION
COMPROMISED SOCKETS Absence of the buccal plate poses a challenge for the
clinician as additional support is required to maintain
As previously mentioned, adequate pre‐operative diagnosis
the bone within the alveolar envelope and isolate it from
of the bone topography and root morphology/angulation is
the soft tissues. Such defects are common in sites of
critical prior to tooth extraction. Teeth with peri‐radicular
fractured teeth and/or teeth with significant infections.
endodontic lesions that are chronic in nature are not a c
ontra‐
Absence of the buccal plate support to the overlying
indication to bone grafting or immediate implant placement
soft tissue may have significant repercussions on the
(Waasdorp et al. 2010). However, active infections should be
final esthetics of the implant. The same considerations
resolved prior to proceeding with any regenerative proto-
in implant placement should be taken into account in
cols. Inspection of the socket is critical following tooth
compromised sites but that implant placement may
removal. Should any d eficiencies be detected additional
pose a risk if performed sub‐optimally (Figure 12.39) or
osseous regenerative procedures should be employed to
if careful pre‐operative case selection is not made.
allow for adequate site preservation for future implant
placement.
• Since the objective of this technique is to perform an in‐ 3 mm from the gingival margin on the mesio‐buccal
situ bone augmentation beyond the confines of the pre- aspect of the socket. The suture needle is then passed
vious socket housing, it may be prudent to trim the over the membrane and exited on the disto‐palatal
membrane slightly larger (1 mm circumferentially) than aspect with the same distance from the gingival margin
what is needed to compensate for the additional bone and mid‐line of the socket. The returning suture points
volume that will stretch the membrane and soft tissue are done from the mesio‐palatal to the disto‐buccal with
toward the buccal direction. the knot placed on the buccal. This technique offers
additional security and compression of the membrane
• Once the membrane is secured and stabilized, a tis-
coronally without compression of the suture thread over
sue plier is utilized to hold the visible occlusal portion
the free gingival margin of the socket which may end up
of the membrane taut to avoid displacement or folding
with depression and clefting of the socket margins
of the membrane during the bone grafting procedure.
(Figure 12.41).
• Typically, an allograft material would be the one of choice
• Peri‐acryl can be used to seal over the socket or an
for this technique.
ovate pontic provisional can also be utilized provided
• The bone graft particles are packed in increments both that the pontic does not extend on to the buccal aspect
in an apical direction and toward the buccal aspect to of the socket or form excessive compression onto the
counteract the compression resulting from the buccal bone graft material (See Figure 12.42).
soft tissue falling into the empty socket.
• A third blunt instrument can also be utilized from the
ESTHETIC RIDGE AUGMENTATION
outer aspect of the tunnel at the apical position to pre-
vent displacement of the bone graft apically. Utilizing a membrane has been reported to be effective in
Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) techniques with
• Finger molding of the outer surface of the site can help
proven long‐term results (Figure 12.43). However, basic
spread and adapt the bone in a more uniform fashion.
GBR principles demand passive primary closure for an
• The bone graft is condensed up to a coronal level at the environment that is conducive to bone regeneration. In
bone crest level if a soft tissue graft is utilized. If no soft addition to the complexity in handling, stabilizing, and
tissue graft is combined at the time of bone augmenta- shaping membranes, in the anterior zone, primary clo-
tion, the graft may be packed up to the level of the soft sure over extraction sockets often results in an unnatural
tissue margins to support the supra‐crestal soft tissue soft tissue architecture by distorting the position of the
volume. muco‐gingival junction. Subsequently, the pursuit for
development and improvement of minimally invasive
• Following which the free occlusal tail of the membrane
technologies has been widely researched over the past
can be simply tucked underneath the palatal tissue with
decades. Among those advancements is utilizing recom-
the aid of an instrument or anchoring suture as described
binant growth factor technology to enhance regenerative
for the soft tissue graft procedures.
outcomes and minimize the use of additional barrier
• An additional criss‐cross securing suture can be per- membranes for guided tissue regeneration (Nevins and
formed entering 3 mm from the midline of the socket and Said 2018).
Figure 12.41 Sub‐optimal implant placement correction. (a) Note the excessive labial positioning of the implant. (b–d) Implant removal is followed by
replacement with a new implant in a more palatal position. (e–f) A resorbable collagen membrane is trimmed according to the defect shape combined with
an allograft material and a rotated pedicle soft tissue graft to augment the labial contour of the site as well as seal over the socket (g).
Rationale
Recombinant technology allows for the availability of syn-
thetically engineered pure human growth factors.
Recombinant human bone morphogenic protein‐2
(rhBMP‐2) has been extensively studied for extraction
socket preservation and sinus elevation in multi‐center
randomized controlled trials (RCTs). (Fiorellini et al. 2005;
Triplett et al. 2009). Recombinant human platelet‐derived
growth factor‐BB (rhPDGF‐BB) has been approved for
periodontal regenerative procedures to enhance the peri-
odontal attachment apparatus (Nevins et al. 2003a, 2005,
2013). Human histologic studies support the ability of rhP-
Figure 12.42 Flapless ridge preservation and implant DGF‐BB to induce periodontal regeneration (Nevins et al.
replacement. 2003a, b). In addition, rhPDGF‐BB has demonstrated
graft is placed at the time of augmentation, the volume of the ugmentation site. Alternatively, if the operator opts to
a
graft may compromise the hard tissue augmentation, yield- avoid vertical incisions, the intra‐sulcular incisions then
ing insufficient reconstitution of the alveolar defect for implant have to be extended two teeth away from the site to be
placement (Figure 12.44). It therefore may be beneficial to augmented.
stage such procedures and focus on hard tissue augmenta-
• Avoid vertical incisions directly over root prominences.
tion and perform soft tissue enhancement procedures at the
time of implant placement or second stage uncovering. • Minimal access flaps with singular or multiple vestibular
sub‐marginal incisions should only be performed follow-
OPEN FLAP APPROACH FOR EXTRACTION ing accurate assessment of the entire defect extension,
SITE MANAGEMENT and still maintain a remote location to avoid having the
incision line rest over the augmented site.
Conservative approaches in the esthetic zone are recom-
mended; often times however, limitations in access for ade- Incision Designs Diagram
quate debridement and augmentation are encountered. It is
up to the operator to determine the need for additional
access to the site if required. At that point, incision design SITE ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION
becomes critical not only to allow sufficient access to the Determining the type and extent of augmentation is per-
site, but must also consider the esthetic endpoint of the formed mainly based on the pre‐operative assessments.
case. Consequently, certain requirements for incision design The operator should determine:
in the esthetic zone must be taken into consideration.
• Orientation of the defect:
Incision Design Requirements
◦◦ Horizontal
• Flaps should be planned to allow for adequate access
◦◦ Vertical
to the site to be addressed, this is pre‐determined
through adequate pre‐operative diagnosis of the defect ◦◦ Combined
topography and the augmentation needs.
• Augmentation needs for the site:
• Papilla reflection should be only performed on periodon-
◦◦ Simple
tally healthy dentition to avoid the compromise of the
interproximal papilla. If extension of the flap to the adja- ◦◦ Moderate
cent teeth is required, papilla sparing incisions should
◦◦ Complex
be considered in periodontally compromised patients.
• Intra‐bony and extra‐bony
• Vertical releasing incisions are not contra‐indicated in
the esthetic zone, but it is preferable to avoid vertical • Type of tissue to be augmented
incisions in the inter‐canine area, to avoid tissue scar-
◦◦ Hard Tissue
ring or clefting in a highly visible area.
◦◦ Soft Tissue
• Vertical releasing incisions should be performed in
remote sites, at least one tooth away from the ◦◦ Combination
(a) (c)
(b)
Figure 12.45 Left column top: Dehisence defects with different severity levels. (a) shows a significant implant dehiscence defect which requires more
extensive flap reflection and management. (b) shows how minor dehiscence defects can be managed in a less invasive approach. Middle column shows
two horizontal type defects. (c) shows a non‐contained horizontal deficiency in which augmentation is required outside of the alveolar envelope. (d) shows
a horizontal deficiency that is more confined and provides a higher regenerative potential and a less demanding augmentation. The last column shows
the difference between two vertical defects with different regenerative potentials due to the amount of bone walls surrounding the defect. (e) Extra‐bony.
(f) Intra‐bony.
Figure 12.46 (a) CT scan with digital wax‐up and virtual implant placement exhibiting inadequate bone to stabilize the proposed implants. (b) shows
the vertical tissue deficiency in relation to the proposed future restoration. (c) The horizontal ridge deficiency can also be evaluated and augmentation
preplanned utilizing 3d printed models (d) to plan the case surgically. These models can also be sterilized to allow pre‐shaping membranes and block
grafts prior to surgical exposure of the site (e and f).
Figure 12.47 The diagnostic wax-up is then converted into a surgical guide to aid the clinician to establish the correct augmentation needs and
adequately place the implants conforming to the desired restorative position.
reflection is carried out until sufficient access is achieved • The guide is also utilized to aid the clinician with the
to expose the defect in addition to about 4 mm circum- amount and location of the site to be augmented in
ferentially around the defect. relation to the future implant supported restoration.
• Tooth extraction and site debridement is performed as • If the defect is only horizontal in nature, a collagen mem-
previously described. brane has been proven to be sufficient in obtaining ade-
quate horizontal augmentation for either a veneer graft
• Implant placement may also be attempted if correct buccal to the implant or reconstitution of sufficient alveo-
implant positioning can be achieved. lar dimensions for future implant placement.
• The surgical guide is utilized to give the operator the • The key to obtaining a predictable regenerative outcome
ideal CEJ/gingival margin position for adequate implant is adequate extension of the membrane and stability of
placement. the blood clot.
Figure 12.49 (a–d) (a) Frontal view implant placement, guided bone regeneration was performed on the buccal aspect, with fixation tacks for added
membrane stability. A connective tissue graft was performed to further augment the tissue volume. The membrane and tissue graft were secured with a
stabilizing periosteal suture. (e–h) occlusal view of the procedure. (j–m) Showing the graft being engaged prior to periosteal anchoring as well as the
periosteal anchorage done with the same suture to stabilize the graft in place. Closure is done above the healing abutment.
• The suture is passed to the opposite edge of the grafted • Need for retrieval
site to anchor the periosteum. • May cause minor tissue dehiscence
• It is then returned to the palatal flap to exit at a point
• Longer lengths 5 mm tend to bend easier
symmetrical to the entry point.
• Access for palatal placement may not always be
• This suture exerts pressure on the edges of the mem-
possible
brane, adapting it to the underlying bone whilst avoiding
compression of the graft material.
Procedure for Tack Insertion
• If the suture bites are taken too close to each other, the
• Following membrane trimming, the membrane fixation is
suture thread creates pressure on the regenerating bone
commenced either on the buccal or lingual aspect.
and may end with a depression of the buccal contour
(Figure 12.50). • The membrane is positioned in the desired orientation.
Figure 12.50 (a–c) Incorrect choice of suture material and placement compressing the graft right in the mid‐buccal portion of the grafted site. (d) note
the point of depression of the buccal bone related to the previously performed suture.
The purchase points should be 3 mm apart, sufficient to Suturing of the Graft and Simultaneous
adapt the graft well to the flap. If the bite sizes are too wide Flap Closure
apart or the suture too tight, the graft will have a tendency
In single tooth sites, where soft tissue grafting is per-
to curl toward the center. Sutures bites that are too close
formed, graft fixation can be combined with initial flap
will not encompass sufficient surface area of the graft to
approximation. This approach is essentially composed of
prevent its rotation and adequately stabilize it.
two vertical mattress sutures performed at the mesial and
distal interproximal papillae.
The graft could also be stabilized to the palatal flap though
the same approach. However, reflection of the palatal flap
Surgical Steps
is required to successfully accomplish closure of the flap
as the space occupied by the tissue graft elevates the In contrast to horizontal mattress sutures, vertical mattress
buccal flap (positions it more coronal), preventing ade- sutures allow coronal positioning and eversion of edges of
quate approximation of the buccal and lingual tissues. By the flap if needed.
elevating the palatal flap adequate closure with connective
tissue contact between the two flaps allows earlier union The suture entry point is from the palatal aspect below the
and better healing. base of the palatal interproximal papilla.
Figure 12.52 (a–c) A mattress suture is used to anchor the graft to the flap. (d) showing the graft sutured to the flap. (e) Buccal bone grafting was
performed. (f) Closure of the site.
The needle is passed through the palatal tissue, through crestal incision in a vertical plane. The graft is engaged,
the graft and in through the buccal flap at about 5 mm from and the needle is then passed into the connective tissue
the tip of the buccal surgical papilla. perpendicular to the buccal bone to ensure at least
2–3 mm of tissue for anchorage. For single tooth sites
The needle is then returned through the buccal flap one suture is usually sufficient. One or more of these
approximately 2 mm coronal to the initial exit point and sutures may be used for larger spans and bigger tissue
then passed straight to the corresponding site on the pala- grafts depending on the clinician’s judgment of the graft
tal aspect without engaging the graft. stability. A third alternative is engaging the periosteum in
two different points along the same horizontal plane con-
The end result of this suture is coronal repositioning of the sequently obtaining a larger surface area to stabilize the
flap and stabilization of the graft. graft. N.B. depending on the accessibility, the suture
may be criss‐crossed. The needle is then passed through
N.B. if the graft is engaged on the return passes of the the graft from a buccal to palatal aspect and finally exits
suture, both the graft and flap will become coronally posi- through the palatal tissue at the same horizontal plane as
tioned which will result in interference of the connective the entry point (Figure 12.53).
tissue graft with the flap edges and subsequently lack of
adequate adaptation of the tissue. The vertical approach is the same concept except in a ver-
tical orientation, meaning that at least two sutures are nec-
STABILIZATION OF THE GRAFT essary to stabilize the graft, one on either side of the graft
An alternative approach stabilizes the graft prior to flap at the mesial and distal edges.
closure which offers the advantage of having more control
of the buccal flap and less mobility of the tissue during the
CLOSURE
suturing process. The most stable tissue is usually the
attached periosteum and overlying connective tissue Closure of the flap should re‐approximate the tissue to its
below the level of the periosteal releasing incision. The tis- original position while utilizing the tissue to offer a protec-
sue is anchored into the periosteum by either a horizontal tive barrier to the underlying augmentation complex.
mattress or vertical mattress type of suture. Should a prosthetic component be placed such as a stock
or customized healing abutment, additional fine interrupted
Suturing is started from the palatal aspect and is offset to sutures should be utilized to achieve good adaptation
either the mesial or distal side and at least 3 mm from the around the abutment.
Figure 12.53 (a–c) Extraction and implant preparation osteotomies. (d) Membrane fixation is performed on the palatal aspect. (e and f) Contour bone
grafting was performed combined with a collagen membrane. (g) Positioning of a free connective tissue graft on the buccal aspect prior to suturing.
(h) Horizontal mattress sutures overlapping the grafts and engaging the periosteum on the buccal flap. (i) Note how tightening of the mattress sutures
allows for coronal advancement of the flap while exerting downward pressure on the soft tissue to ensure adequate stability of the free graft. (j) Closure of
the flap, showing minor areas of the underlying connective tissue used to cover the extraction site openings.
MANAGING IMPLANT TISSUE DEFICIENCIES 2. CBCT evaluation revealed Class IV type sockets with
inadequate socket or apical topography for immediate
Regardless of efforts employed to preserve and augment
implant placement (Figure 12.54).
the tissue volume, certain deficiencies resulting from s urgical
complications, inadequate tissue management/augmenta- 3 . Teeth extraction was performed atraumatically with
tion, or simply severe anatomical deficiencies may comp FDBA allograft placed to the level of the soft
romise implant placement and long‐term implant function. tissue.
4. Prosthetic sealing of the socket was performed with a
As previously discussed, correct three-dimensional
fixed tooth supported provisional bridge.
implant placement may not always be possible at the time
of tooth extraction. Efforts to reconstitute the deficient tis- 5. Four months post extraction, note the preservation of
sue volume should then be maximized at the time of tooth the gingival architecture and support of the interproxi-
extraction, often requiring significantly larger procedures. mal the soft tissue profile (Figure 12.55).
However, certain patient related factors such as esthetics,
6. Five months CBCT scan revealed adequate bone fill,
patient refusal of more invasive procedures, and healing
but residual apical concavity preventing adequate
potential can often hinder clinicians in achieving the
implant placement (Figure 12.55).
optimal results in one surgery. Therefore, alternative less
invasive techniques may be performed in stages to spe- 7. Implant placement was planned through a digitally
cifically address deficient sites or complications. guided approach to avoid flap reflection and disruption
of the tissue architecture
Case Study: Apical Topography (Vestibular 8. Based on the pre‐operative planning, the site of implant fen-
Approach) estration was accounted for prior to the surgical procedure.
1. A 37 year old medically healthy patient presented with 9. Tissue punch and flapless implant placement was per-
severely decayed maxillary central incisors and failed formed. Note the bone graft encapsulation within the
root canal therapy. soft tissue. (Figure 12.56).
Figure 12.55 Note the bone preservation of the ridge with maintanence of the soft tissue architecture.
Figure 12.56 Soft tissue punch performed for flapless implant placement. Note the bone graft particle encapsulation within the soft tissues which act to
preserve the tissue volume in the area.
Figure 12.58 Final implant restoration and veneers to mask the congenitally missing laterals.
10. A small vestibular incision was utilized to address the • Dual zone bone grafting protocols combined with pros-
site without the need for reflection of a full thickness thetic socket sealing may provide better maintenance of
flap that may have compromised the esthetics of the the soft tissue architecture and volume, offering a less
case. invasive approach to soft tissue grafting procedures.
11. F
ull thickness reflection was performed to expose • The same philosophy can be performed with simultane-
the defect entirety with sufficient space to accom- ous implant sites and in more compromised sites,
modate for membrane placement and bone graft provided that:
material.
1. The implant is not placed outside of the alveolar enve-
12. Site closure with microsutures (Figure 12.57).
lope as the avascular implant surface will hinder cellular
13. Final case following finalization of the restoration. migration and subsequent bone formation buccal to the
implant.
14. P
ost‐operative CT scan revealed adequate buccal
bone both in the coronal and apical portions. 2. Excessive buccal inclination or poorly positioned
implants should be removed and replaced with a more
Lessons learned: Staging procedures with less invasive palatally positioned implant either immediately or in
augmentation techniques may provide an alternative to staged fashion. A more palatal relocation of the implant
larger reconstructive procedures with more esthetically will also allow more space for the buccal hard and soft
acceptable results (Figure 12.58). tissue augmentation.
Figure 12.59 (a–j) Sequential procedures for the treatment of a failed implant site with a “same‐site minimally invasive surgical approach.”
severe nature in the esthetic zone with a single incision. This reconstitution of tissue volume, as well as minimizing
is especially useful in esthetically sensitive areas with com- soft tissue architecture distortion through less invasive
plex peri‐implant deficiencies (Figures 12.59 and 12.60). approaches. As clinical practice becomes more
demanding our techniques have evolved to involve
less invasion while simultaneously enhancing the over-
CONCLUSION
all results. Therefore, as clinicians, our approaches to
The purpose of this chapter was to illustrate the more complex sites should be tailored to minimize the
d ifferent components of establishing optimum peri‐
invasiveness to the patient without compromising the
implant esthetics through correct implant positioning, end result (Figure 12.61).
Kan, J.Y., Roe, P., Rungcharassaeng, K. et al. (2011). Classification of Nevins, M.L. and Said, S. (2018). Minimally invasive esthetic ridge
sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous preservation with growth‐factor enhanced bone matrix. J. Esthet.
housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed Restor. Dent. 30 (3): 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12357.
tomography study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 26 (4): 873–876.
Salama, H. and Salama, M. (1993). The role of orthodontic extrusive
Linkevicius, T., Apse, P., Grybauskas, S., and Puisys, A. (2009). The remodeling in the enhancement of soft and hard tissue profiles prior
influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around to implant placement: a systematic approach to the management of
implants: a 1‐year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int. J. Oral extraction site defects. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 13 (4):
Maxillofac. Implants (4): 24. 312–333.
McAllister, B.S., Haghighat, K., Prasad, H.S., and Rohrer, M.D. (2010). Simion, M., Rocchietta, I., and Dellavia, C. (2007). Three‐dimensional
Histologic evaluation of recombinant human platelet‐derived growth ridge augmentation with xenograft and recombinant human platelet‐
factor‐BB after use in extraction socket defects: a case series. Int. J. derived growth factor‐BB in humans: report of two cases. Int. J.
Periodontics Restorative Dent. (4): 30. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 27 (2): 109–115.
Nevins, M., Camelo, M., Nevins, M.L. et al. (2003a). Periodontal Spray, J.R., Black, C.G., Morris, H.F., and Ochi, S. (2000). The
regeneration in humans using recombinant human platelet‐derived influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response:
growth factor‐BB (rhPDGF‐BB) and allogenic bone. J. Periodont. 74 stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann. Periodont. 5
(9): 1282–1292. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.9.1282. (1): 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119.
Nevins, M.L., Camelo, M., Nevins, M., et al. (2009a). Minimally invasive Tettamanti, S., Millen, C., Gavric, J. et al. (2016). Esthetic evaluation of
alveolar ridge augmentation procedure (tunneling technique) using implant crowns and peri‐implant soft tissue in the anterior maxilla:
rhPDGF-BB in combination with three matrices: A case series. Int. comparison and reproducibility of three different indices. Clin.
J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 29: 371–383. Implant Dent. Rel. Res. 18 (3): 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/
cid.12306.
Nevins, M., Garber, D., Hanratty, J.J. et al. (2009b). Human histologic
evaluation of anorganic bovine bone mineral combined with recom- Triplett, R.G., Nevins, M., Marx, R.E. et al. (2009). Pivotal, randomized,
binant human platelet‐derived growth factor BB in maxillary sinus parallel evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic
augmentation: case series study. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative protein‐2/absorbable collagen sponge and autogenous bone graft
Dent. 29 (6): 583–591. for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac.
Implants 67 (9): 1947–1960.
Nevins, M., Giannobile, W.V., McGuire, M.K. et al. (2005). Platelet‐
derived growth factor stimulates bone fill and rate of attachment Waasdorp, J.A., Evian, C.I., Mandracchia, M. (2010). Immediate
level gain: results of a large multicenter randomized controlled trial. placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the
J. Periodont. 76 (12): 2205–2215. https://doi.org/10.1902/ literature. J. Periodontol. 81 (6): 801–808.
jop.2005.76.12.2205.
Zadeh, H.H. (2011). Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior
Nevins, M., Kao, R.T., McGuire, M.K. et al. (2013). Platelet‐derived gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tun-
growth factor promotes periodontal regeneration in localized osse- nel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB. Int. J. Periodontics
ous defects: 36‐month extension results from a randomized, con- Restorative Dent. 31: 653–660.
trolled, double‐masked clinical trial. J. Periodont. 84 (4): 456–464.
https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120141.
213
DIGITAL SOLUTIONS FOR PLANNING
AND MANUFACTURING OF TEETH‐
The Mainstream SUPPORTED RESTORATIONS
Market Digital Tools for Analysis and Treatment
The Early The
Market Chasm Planning
The first papers discussing utilization of photography for
Figure 13.1 Adapted from technology adoption life cycle. Source: http:// smile analysis were published in the 1990s (Wichmann
www.insightsquared.com/2016/01/the‐saas‐startup‐guide‐to‐crossing‐ 1990). Over the years it has evolved to advanced tech-
the‐chasm. niques for design of restorations in the esthetic zone using
Powerpoint, Keynote, or Photoshop software packages
(Arias et al. 2015; Sundar and Chelliah 2018). In this way
These technologies in general follow the technology the 2D design was planned based on the facial and dental
adoption life cycle which vary in duration and intensity landmarks, such as:
(Figure 13.1). It is not clear if some of the currently devel-
oped technologies will cross the so-called “chasm” and • facial midline;
will be used by the majority of practitioners.
• inter‐pupillary, commissural line;
Nowadays, IOS, CBCT, CAD/CAM, and other systems are • upper teeth exposure during rest, speech, and
used extensively in daily practice. Merging of the images smiling, which in turn depends on: (i) mobility of the lips;
from various sources (IOS, lab scanner, CBCT, face scan- (ii) vertical length of upper lip; (iii) clinical crown length;
ner, digital camera) make the foundation for the “digital (iv) skeletal relationships (Ritter et al. 2006);
patient” concept. Fully‐digital workflow now is a reality, • buccal corridor;
especially for less extensive cases. While more extensive
cases (e.g. full‐arch restorations) still involve hybrid digital– • smile line;
conventional procedures. • lower lip line during smiling;
Digital technologies have empowered the conventional • exposure of the incisal edge;
techniques giving the opportunity for less invasive, more • dental midline;
controlled, faster, cheaper, and longer-lasting treatment
modalities, such as full‐arch four implant‐supported • proportions of the width and length of the teeth;
restorations (Ayub et al. 2017). • progressive axial inclinations of the anterior teeth;
• papilla and teeth height ratio;
Currently available digital technologies are changing the
face of dentistry, forming new diagnostic (combining the • some others, including anterior teeth contact areas,
CBCT and ultrasonography data) (Chan et al. 2017), treat- incisal frames, etc.
ment (accelerated orthodontic treatment) (Piezocision™
2016), lab production (3D printing of dental ceramics) Subsequently, terms such as digital smile, virtual smile,
(Dehurtevent et al. 2017), follow‐up (superimposition of digital smile design, etc. and protocols have been
IOS data) (Hartkamp et al. 2017), and educational (AR) reported by different authors (Ackerman and Ackerman
(Kwon et al. 2018) tools. It is a huge challenge for practi- 2002; Coachman and Paravina 2016; McLaren et al.
tioners to adapt to these changes and to decide which 2013). Sets of standardized facial and dental photographs
technology is worth the investment and can provide rea- are taken and imported to the above mentioned programs
sonable return on investment (ROI). Switching from analog or special software, dedicated to digital smile design
to digital workflow comes with the need to update profes- (e.g. DSD App, Smile Designer Pro, Romexis smile design,
sional terms. The American College of Prosthodontics 3Shape smile design, etc.). Based on the facial midline,
(ACP) has issued the Glossary of Digital Dental Terms inter‐pupillary, commissural, and additional lines the rota-
(Grant et al. 2016). Dental practices are facing demands tional calibration of the image is done (Figure 13.2.1).
to collect and store large amounts of 2D and 3D images. Preferred reference points are selected in order to cali-
Due to increased sharing of sensitive data, adhering to brate the photos of retracted and non‐retracted smile
guidelines, such as the Health Insurance Portability and (Figure 13.2.2). In order to do the measurements at the
Accountability Act (HIPPA) Privacy Rule and Security Rule design stage, the calibrated ruler should be used indicat-
becomes more crucial. ing real intraoral measurements (e.g. length of the central
Figure 13.2.1 Rotational calibration of the face photo based on the Figure 13.2.3 Calibration of the dimensions is done with the ruler, in
facial horizontal and vertical lines. order to indicate measurements on the final smile design version.
(a)
(b)
Figure 13.2.2 Photos of retracted and non‐retracted smile are calibrated by selecting reference points.
(a)
Figure 13.2.4 Esthetic framework has been determined from the frontal, 12 o’clock, and occlusal aspects considering esthetic and biologic aspects.
(a) (b)
Figure 13.2.5 Different teeth form libraries can be employed to facilitate the smile design process and to create realistic simulation of the planned result.
After completion of the 2D design, it is transferred to the but also biological and functional aspects can be
3D design step, which can be done either on a conven- addressed in a more detailed way.
tional model or a digital model. There are different ways
to align a 2D model to a 3D model, however these tech- Based on 3D planning, mock‐ups, or temporary restora-
niques inevitably involve a certain level of inaccuracy. tions can be fabricated paying much attention to the smile
For this reason, it would be more beneficial to proceed design. Mock‐up is a very powerful tool helping to evaluate
straight to 3D design, avoiding limitations of 2D treatment esthetics, phonetics, and occlusal relationships and gives
planning. a perfect opportunity for the patient to evaluate planned
final results (Simon and Magne 2008). Moreover, it is very
Merging of several 3D images obtained from face scanner, useful for guiding preparations of the teeth and ensuring
CBCT, IOS, combining it with virtual articulator and 2D minimal invasiveness during this and subsequent steps
intraoral and extraoral photographs, currently provides (Figure 13.2.8). The application of the mock‐up can be
the maximum diagnostic potential for complex treatment limited in cases where extensive crown lengthening and
planning (Figure 13.2.7). Based on this, not only esthetic, reduction of the tooth structure is anticipated.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 13.2.7 Lower jaw tracking device (a) can be used with CBCT data, allowing capability of functional CBCT, where individual patient movements
can be simulated on the mandible (b). With the aid of a special fork (c), the position of the maxilla as well as mandibular movement data file can be
imported to the CAD system, enabling reproduction of individual mandibular movements on virtual articulator and manufacturing dental prostheses with
functional occlusion design (d).
(b) (d)
(e)
Figure 13.2.8 Restorative treatment for upper incisors (a) was planned using smile design and mock‐up (b). Tooth reduction through mock‐up (c)
enabled controlling reduction of the teeth and thickness of the restorations (d). Final result (e) was achieved in a controlled way based on the initial plan.
can still be challenging. Therefore, hybrid workflow includ- The procedure for the single crowns is straightforward –
ing both analog and digital techniques can be employed. digital impression with IOS is taken after preparation.
CAD design can be done chairside or in the lab using
Three‐dimensional accuracy of digital impression with IOS is the pre‐preparation method, mirroring the opposite
of crucial importance. In addition, the ability of different IOS tooth form and designed individually using automated
algorithms to interpret finish lines is also essential. It has processes (Arslan et al. 2015). Many features, including
been reported that color output from IOS may enhance the occlusal surface anatomy, cut‐back technique, cement
identification of the finish line due to contrasting colors, but is gap, distance to margin and others, can be controlled
still dependent on the underlying technology (Nedelcu et al. during the CAD design phase (Figure 13.2.10a). A virtual
2018). Many studies have been published reporting similar articulator can be used to simulate mandibular move-
accuracy level at the margin of digitally and conventionally ments and automatically adjust the shape of the pros-
produced single crowns (Boeddinghaus et al. 2015). thesis (Figure 13.2.10b). Master cast is an obligatory
However, some of them have reached conclusions, that con- step in conventional restoration fabrication workflow.
ventional impression and pressed restorations produced While in digital workflow full‐contour restorations can be
more accurate 2D and 3D margin fits (Anadioti et al. 2014). made, avoiding this step. A 3D printed or milled model
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 13.2.9 Patient with worn dentition had esthetic demands (a), therefore 2D digital planning of the smile was done (b). Based on CBCT and IOS
data, prospective margin of the restoration was planned and need for the bone reduction estimated (c). 3D printed surgical guide for crown‐lengthening
was produced (d). Digital wax‐up was done, taking 2D planning as guidance (e and f) and models produced with a 3D printer. Silicon indexes were
produced on 3D printed models (g and h) and used for mock‐up, in order to evaluate esthetics, phonetics, and occlusion (i). Later, surgical guide was used
as the reference in order to perform crown lengthening.
(e) (f)
(g) (h)
(i) (j)
(b)
(c)
Figure 13.2.10 CAD software offers many useful tools to control the design of restorations (a), including the virtual articulator (b). A monolithic
full‐contour crown from translucent multi‐layered zirconia blank was milled, infiltrated, stained, and glazed after taking digital impression and using CAD
design. Die was printed using a 3D printer in order to adjust the margins of the restoration (c).
(b) (d)
Figure 13.2.11 Hybrid conventional‐digital method was utilized to restore upper and lower dentition. After initial situation evaluation (a), digital design
and mock‐up (b and c) was made. Conventional impressions were used to fabricate master models, and CAD design was applied based on data from
digital design, mock‐up, or temporary restoration phase. Restorations were finalized (d–g) according to the initial treatment plan.
(c)
(e)
(d)
Figure 13.2.12 Tooth‐ and implant‐supported removable partial denture and zirconia bridge with attachments were planned for the case. Conventional
impressions were taken and master cast fabricated (a). CAD software was used to design zirconia fixed partial denture with extracoronal attachments,
according to the selected path of insertion, which was done using digital parallelometer (b). Traditional pick‐up impression was taken with seated FPD and
overdenture attachments on implants. Master cast was scanned and CAD design or RPD was made (c). Using digital tools, isolation in the area of minor
connectors, finish lines, and thickness of the RPD framework can be easily controlled (d). High performance polymer PEEK blank was used to mill RPD
framework (e). Denture teeth were set and acrylics heat processed in a traditional way. Corresponding parts of the RPD attachments were glued to the RPD
and prosthesis finalized (f). Prosthesis was delivered to the patient and currently in service for four years (g and h).
(c) (d)
(e)
Figure 13.3.1 Initial clinical situation resulting from previous dental trauma (a). Implant placement and soft tissue formation using CAD/CAM
temporary restorationas (b). Final restoration was produced taking temporary restorations as a reference (images from the frontal and side aspect – c and
d). Abutment material effect on the color of the peri‐implant tissues can be selected by using spectrophotometry readings (e).
(c)
(d) (e)
Figure 13.3.2 Custom abutment and temporary cement‐retained crown is designed in the CAD (a and b). Abutment can be milled from zirconia and
cemented on the titanium base (c). Temporary crown on the abutment can be cemented extraorally. Custom abutment is placed in the mouth and attached
permanently using the final torque indicated by the manufacturer (d). Temporary crown is placed on custom abutment (e). After soft tissue healing, margin
on the custom abutment can be modified and abutment level impression taken for the final restoration.
Complex cases would need 3D printed models, which still biotechnology, 3D printing, artificial intelligence (AI), virtual,
lack the required level of accuracy. Conventional tech- and AR are very common, including the fact that available
niques today still have the edge with certain procedures: knowledge nowadays is shared between billions of
edentulous cases, VDO increase, implant‐supported people.
overdentures, etc.
Fusion of 3D and 2D data from various sources made the
foundation for the concept of “the virtual patient” and has
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
further improved. This enables diagnostic, treatment, and
The currently developing fourth industrial revolution (4IR) follow‐up capabilities at much better level. Due to this,
is about to affect and disrupt all kinds of industry. Fusion of requirements to store, share, and protect huge amounts of
digital, physical, and biological realms is characteristic for data continue to increase. Large amounts of medical infor-
4IR. Developments in fields of robotics, nanotechnology, mation create a challenge of correct interpretation of the
(b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
Figure 13.3.3 A two implant placement was planned as a fully‐guided procedure (a and b). Using the planned implant positions, final zirconia abutments
and temporary crowns were planned using split file (c and d). After fully‐guided implant placement, custom zirconia abutments were tightened and temporary
crowns placed and evaluated for the need for adjustment (e). Final full‐contour zirconia crowns were made two months after implant placement (f).
(c)
(d)
Figure 13.3.4 Implant was planned in the site of missing molar tooth (a). Right after the implant placement DII was taken to record implant position and
the occlusion relationship. During the next few hours full‐contour ceramic crown was produced and cemented to the titanium base (b). Screw‐retained
crown was delivered on the same day under functional loading conditions (c). Restoration is now followed for a period of one year (d).
data. Moreover, static images are more and more supple- registration techniques should be further improved as
mented with dynamic 3D data, e.g. dynamic face scanner, currently complex cases belong more to the conventional
filming of mandibular movements with IOS, integrating side. Digital workflow should further be supplemented with
data from jaw tracking devices with CAD and CBCT soft- more accurate and faster 3D printing technology.
ware. New to dentistry, future imaging technologies like
OCT (optical coherent tomography), MSCT (multi‐slice Many advantages of digital workflow come from the array
computerized tomography), traditional, and dynamic MRI of dental materials that can be conveniently used only with
and others are making their way in to clinical applications. CAM equipment. CAM techniques enable high precision
and standardization of the work, minimizing the human
AR is used to show the planned esthetic outcome to the factor. Multi‐layered restorations are becoming more and
patient in real time (Figure 13.4). There is huge potential for more popular as this allows for dental restorations with a
integrating AR into surgical and restorative procedures. more natural appearance, with zones of different translu-
cency and color. This potential could be further increased
IOS usage for taking impressions revolutionized prostho- with additive technologies (e.g. 3D printing of ceramic
dontics. However, clinical procedures before taking digital materials) enabling production of different mechanical,
impressions from the teeth remain virtually the same, physical, and optical features at different volumes of the
including proper gingival retraction techniques and fluid restoration. AMF and other similar production file formats
control. Ability to supplement optical impression with OCT, will be used for this instead of STL. Subtractive and addi-
ultrasound, or other technology enabling avoidance of tive technologies are expected to be able to produce
gingival retraction could substantially change this clinical ultrathin restorations of good mechanical properties in
step. Accuracy of IOS for full‐arch scanning and bite order to reduce invasiveness of restorative procedures.
(d) (e)
(h) (i)
Figure 13.3.5 Full‐arch implant‐supported fixed prostheses were planned for a patient with failing dentition (a). Surgical guides were produced based
on CBCT double scan technique with radiological guides (b). Immediately after teeth extraction and implant placement, milled temporary restorations were
produced (c). Based on digital smile design (d), shape of the final restorations was designed in CAD software and substructure from high performance
polymer (PEEK) was produced (e). After fitting substructure intraorally, digital bite registration with IOS was accomplished (f). Full contour individual
crowns were milled from wax (g) and pressed from lithium‐disilicate ceramics (h). Gingival part was modeled with composite resin (i) and prosthesis
delivered to the patient (j).
Direct additive technologies allowing avoidance of labora- AI will increase efficiency of diagnostic and treatment
tory steps are also under development. algorithms and automation will be used more in the pro-
duction of dental restorations. Mobile health applications
Besides 3D printing of models and restorations, bio‐printing will continue to improve oral public health (e.g. BruxApp
of the soft and hard tissue scaffolds with and without cell application to assess awake bruxism). Telemedicine in
cultures could offer new possibilities in cases demanding dentistry is expanding, with some attempts to exclude
regenerative procedures which can be combined with local dental offices. First attempts have been demon-
dental implant placement and restorative procedures. strated of autonomous robotic dental implant placement.
Chan, H.‐L., Wang, H.‐L., Fowlkes, J.B. et al. (2017 Mar). Non‐ionizing
real‐time ultrasonography in implant and oral surgery: a feasibility
study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 28 (3): 341–347.
Anadioti, E., Aquilino, S.A., Gratton, D.G. et al. (2014 Dec). 3D and 2D Nedelcu, R., Olsson, P., Nyström, I., and Thor, A. (2018). Finish line
marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conven-
made from digital and conventional impressions. J. Prosthodont. tional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison. BMC Oral
Off. J. Am. Coll. Prosthodont. 23 (8): 610–617. Health. 18 (1): 27.
Arias, D.M., Trushkowsky, R.D., Brea, L.M., and David, S.B. (2015 Park M-E and Shin S‐Y. (2018). Three‐dimensional comparative study
Jul). Treatment of the patient with gummy smile in conjunction with on the accuracy and reproducibility of dental casts fabricated by
digital smile approach. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 59 (3): 703–716. 3D printers. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2018 Feb 21; 215‐0.
Arslan, Y., Karakoca Nemli, S., Bankoğlu Güngör, M. et al. (2015 Dec). Piezocision™, D.S. (2016). Accelerating orthodontic tooth movement
Evaluation of biogeneric design techniques with CEREC CAD/CAM while correcting hard and soft tissue deficiencies. Front. Oral Biol.
system. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 7 (6): 431–436. 18: 102–108.
Ayub, K.V., Ayub, E.A., Lins do Valle, A. et al. (2017 Dec). Seven‐year Ritter, D.E., Gandini, L.G., Pinto A dos, S. et al. (2006). Analysis of the
follow‐up of full‐arch prostheses supported by four implants: a pro- smile photograph. World J. Orthod. 7 (3): 279–285.
spective study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 32 (6): 1351–1358.
Rutkūnas, V., Gečiauskaitė, A., Jegelevičius, D., and Vaitiekūnas, M.
Block, M.S. and Emery, R.W. (2016 Feb). Static or dynamic navigation for (2017). Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners.
implant placement–choosing the method of guidance. J. Oral Maxillofac. A systematic review. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 10 (Suppl 1): 101–120.
Surg. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 74 (2): 269–277.
Simon, H. and Magne, P. (2008 May). Clinically based diagnostic
Boeddinghaus, M., Breloer, E.S., Rehmann, P., and Wöstmann, B. wax‐up for optimal esthetics: the diagnostic mock‐up. J. Calif. Dent.
(2015 Nov). Accuracy of single‐tooth restorations based on intraoral Assoc. 36 (5): 355–362.
Note: Page numbers in italics refer to figures, those in bold refer to tables.
3‐D implant positioning see three‐ micro architecture of the bone/tooth augmentation using tissue‐engineered
dimensional implant positioning relationship and the interface of soft and bone 160–161
4IR (fourth industrial revolution), future hard connective tissues 21–24, 25 bisphosphonate therapy, osteonecrosis of
perspectives 227–231 mucogingival junction (MGJ) 26–28 the jaws 15
normal dental/alveolar vascular supply 22 blood pressure cuff 6
alveolar distraction osteogenesis palatal artery‐extension of greater palatine blood supply within the alveolar and basal
surgery 107–115 artery 21 bone of the dental arches 21
advantages 107 vascular supply: macro and micro 19–21 bone composition 11
armamentarium 107 anesthesia, dental implants 123, 125, 126 cells: osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and
consolidation period 111–112 angiogenesis, wound healing 30, 31 osteocytes 11
history 107 apical guiding “marionette” suture, matrix: organic and inorganic 11
indications 107, 108 SubEpithelial Connective Tissue Graft bone densitometry (DEXA: Dual Energy
latency period 111 (SECTG) 189–190 X‐Ray Absorptiometry), bone density
limitations 107 apico‐coronal position, three‐dimensional measuring technique 14
possible complications 115 implant positioning 179, 181 bone density measuring techniques 14
postoperative instructions 114–115 apicoectomy 45, 47, 48, 51–60 cone beam computed tomography 14
preoperative instructions 114 see also endodontic therapy DEXA: Dual Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry
technique for the anterior complications 59–60 (bone densitometry) 14
segment 107–113 definition 51 fractal analysis of bone texture 14
technique for the posterior segment full‐thickness submarginal incision quantitative computed tomography
113, 114 54–55 (QCT) 14
words of caution 114 indications 51 quantitative ultrasound (QUS) 14
amalgam tattoo 147–148 intraoral examination 52 bone formation 11–14
anatomy of the dental/alveolar local anesthesia (pain control and endochondral ossification 11
structures 19–32 hemostasis) 52–53 intramembranous ossification 11
see also wound healing moisture control 58 bone graft material, selection 180–181
arteriole wall merged with periosteum of mucogingival flap 54–55 bone graft procedure, SubEpithelial
antral wall venules surround arteriole 25 osteotomy and curettage 55–56 Connective Tissue Graft (SECTG) 191
blood supply within the alveolar and basal papillary‐based incision 55 bone implications
bone of the dental arches 21 phases 52–60 dental implants 15–16
buccal plate vessels 22–24, 24 postoperative instructions 59 osteonecrosis of the jaws 15
buccal wall of sinus, artery 25 presurgical preparation 52 periodontitis 16
cementum 28, 29 radiographic examination 52 bone remodeling 12–14
epithelial structures, anatomy and vascular recall 60 actions 12
supply 28–29, 30 retrofill 58 calcitonin 13
interproximal papilla vessels, arborization 25 retropreparation 57–58 low‐density lipoprotein receptor–related
investing soft connecting tissue, anatomy review of medical history 52 proteins 13
and vascular supply 25–28, 29 root resection 56, 57 markers of bone formation 12
mandible vs maxilla, issues of anatomic soft tissue flap design 53, 54 markers of bone resorption 12
interest 22–24 staining and inspection 56–57 osteoporosis 13–14
mandibular first bicuspid, internal surgical technique 52–60 osteoprotegerin (OPG) 13
microarchitecture 23 suturing and suture removal 59 parathyroid hormone (PTH) 13
mandibular first molar, internal arteriole wall merged with periosteum of periodontitis 12
microarchitecture of furcation area 23 antral wall venules surround arteriole 25 stages 12
maxillary artery distribution 20 vitamin C 13
maxillary bicuspid, internal Bicon short implants, dental vitamin D 13
microarchitecture 23 implants 123, 123 vitamin K 13
maxillary first molar, internal biopsy techniques, oral soft tissue 153–154, bone‐stimulating factors, dental implants 16
microarchitecture of furcation area 23 155 bone types 11
maxillary first molar, mature resting alveolar armamentarium 153 cortical bone 11
bone from core 24 biopsy data sheet 155 trabecular bone 11
maxillary sinus periosteum (Monkey/ excisional scalpel biopsy 153, 154 Branemark’s technique, dental implants
vascular‐India ink perfused) 21, 22 incisional scalpel biopsy 153 32, 121–122
maxilla vs mandible, issues of anatomic biopsy techniques, treatment and expansion buccal plate vessels 22–24, 24
interest 22–24 of periosteal biopsies, sinus buccal wall of sinus, artery 25
233
bucco‐palatal position safe‐zone green red osseointegration 15–16, 121 root canal therapy, treatment of failed 44
diagram, three‐dimensional implant osteotomy: single implant 125–129 surgical operating microscope (SOM) 43
positioning 179, 180 placement 121–135, 179, 180 tooth conservation vs implants 43–44
possible complications 130–135 types of endodontic surgery 48–51
calcitonin, bone remodeling 13 possible problems 130–135 entry incision, dental implants 125, 127
cementum 28, 29 pre‐operative implant site epithelial cells, wound healing 31
chronic ulcerative stomatitis 140 assessment 172–174, 175 epithelial closure, wound healing 32
cicatricial (mucous membrane) rationale 181–183 epithelial structures, anatomy and vascular
pemphigoid 141–142 short implants 123, 123, 131, 133, supply 28–29, 33
closure of the flap 205 134, 135 epulis fissuratum 144
combined periodontal and prosthodontic site preparation 125–129 erythema multiforme (EM) 143
care see treatment planning, socket seal 183–192 erythematous marginal gingiva 140, 141
combined periodontal and prosthodontic surgical technique 123–130 esthetic ridge augmentation 194–197
care tapping threads 129 decision making in soft tissue
compromised sockets: socket seal 192 three‐dimensional implant positioning augmentation following bone graft
computer guided piezocision‐orthodontics 179, 180 procedure 196–197
see Piezocision™ assisted orthodontics tissue augmentation at the time of tooth Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
cone beam computed tomography, bone extraction 175–177 194–197, 196
density measuring technique 14 tissue deficiencies 206–209, 209–210 exploratory surgery, endodontic therapy 46
conscious IV sedation utilizing tooth conservation vs implants 43–44
midazolam 3–9 wound healing 32 fibroma 137, 138
armamentarium 4, 5 desquamative gingival lesions, diagnosis fibroplasia, wound healing 31
ASA physical status classification 5 and treatment 142 fixture (implant) installation, dental
blood pressure cuff 6 desquamative gingivitis 140–142 implants 130, 131
catheter insertion in the vein 8 DEXA: Dual Energy X‐Ray Absorptiometry flapless ridge preservation, socket
continuums of depth of sedation, definition (bone densitometry), bone density seal 192–193
and levels 3, 4 measuring technique 14 foreign body gingivitis 140, 141
dosage and administration 7–8 digital technologies, clinical restorative fourth industrial revolution (4IR), future
IV catheters of various size 7 dentistry 213–231 perspectives 227–231
IV drip, monitoring that the fluid that goes advantages and limitations 223 fractal analysis of bone texture, bone density
into the IV line 8 clinical applications of digital techniques in measuring technique 14
IV portal secured with transparent film implant‐supported restorations 225–227 future perspectives 227–231
dressing 8 clinical applications of digital techniques in fourth industrial revolution (4IR) 227–231
maintenance dose 8–9 tooth‐supported restorations 217–223,
medical emergencies 9 224 GBR (Guided Bone Regeneration), esthetic
oxygen cannula 6 from conventional to digital ridge augmentation 194, 196
physical status 5 technologies 213–214 giant cell fibroma 137
post‐operative instruction 9 digital tools for analysis and treatment gingival cyst of the adult 139
pre‐operative vital signs chart 6 planning 214–217, 218, 219 gingival enlargement 144
pulse oximetry 6 implant‐supported restorations 223–227 gingival fibromatosis 145
reversal agent for Midazolam 9 planning, analysis (CBCT, radiological gingival nodules 137
saline bag used for IV sedation 7 guides, dual‐scan, surgical guides, gingival
steps in IV sedation 4–9 dynamic guidance) 223–225 overgrowth, medication‐induced 144
training in intravenous conscious planning and manufacturing of teeth‐ Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR), esthetic
sedation 3 supported restorations 214–223 ridge augmentation 194, 196
continuums of depth of sedation, definition tooth‐supported restorations 214–223, 224
and levels 3, 4 drilling problems, dental implants 130 herpes 152
cortical bone, bone type 11 drill speed, dental implants 128 HIV‐associated gingivitis 152–153
horizontal adaptive mattress suture,
dental implants 15–16 EM (erythema multiforme) 143 SubEpithelial Connective Tissue Graft
see also papillary construction after dental endochondral ossification, bone (SECTG) 190
implant therapy formation 11 hyperplastic gingivitis 144–145
anesthesia 123, 125, 126 endodontic therapy 43–60
Bicon short implants 123, 123 see also apicoectomy iatrogenic factors, endodontic therapy
bone graft material, selection 180–181 anatomical challenges 44 44, 45
bone implications 15–16 contraindications for endodontic implants, dental see dental implants
bone‐stimulating factors 16 surgery 46–48 infections 152–153
Branemark’s technique 32, 121–122 exploratory surgery 46 herpes 152
drilling problems 130 history and evolution 43 HIV‐associated gingivitis 152–153
drill speed 128 iatrogenic factors 44, 45 necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis (NUG) 153
entry incision 125, 127 implants vs tooth conservation 43–44 necrotizing ulcerative periodontitis 153
fixture (implant) installation 130, 131 incision and drainage 48 insertion torque, dental implants 130
history 121–123, 124 indications for endodontic surgery 44–46 intentional replantation, endodontic
indications 123 intentional replantation 49–51 therapy 49–51
insertion torque 130 rationale for endodontic surgery 44 indications and case selection 49
options for tissue augmentation relentless inflammation 45, 46 surgical technique 49–51
procedures 182–183 root amputation and hemisection 49 interproximal papilla vessels, arborization 25
234 Index
intramembranous ossification, bone open flap approach for extraction site oral melanoma 149
formation 11 management 197 physiologic pigmentation 146
investing soft connecting tissue, anatomy oral melanoacanthoma (melanoacanthosis) smoker’s melanosis 147
and vascular supply 25–28, 29 148 planning
oral melanocytic nevus 148, 149 see also treatment planning, combined
leukemia 145 oral melanoma 149 periodontal and prosthodontic care
lichenoid mucositis 140 osseointegration, dental implants 15–16, 121 planning, analysis (CBCT, radiological
lichen planus 140, 141 osteonecrosis of the jaws 15 guides, dual‐scan, surgical guides,
ligneous conjunctivitis 145–146 bisphosphonate therapy 15 dynamic guidance) 223–225
ligneous gingivitis 145–146 diagnosis 15 planning and manufacturing of teeth‐
linear IgA disease 142 osteoporosis supported restorations 214–223
low‐density lipoprotein receptor–related bone remodeling 13–14 plasma cell gingivitis 142–143
proteins, bone remodeling 13 mandibular osteoporosis 16 plasma cell mucositis 143
Lyell’s disease (toxic epidermal osteoprotegerin (OPG), bone remodeling 13 positioning mattress suture, SubEpithelial
necrolysis) 143 osteotomy: single implant, dental Connective Tissue Graft
implants 125–129 (SECTG) 190–191
malignant neoplasia 150–152 oxygen cannula 6 post‐operative care, Piezocision™ assisted
metastatic disease 151–152 orthodontics 41
squamous cell carcinoma 150–151 palatal artery‐extension of greater palatine pre‐operative implant site assessment
verrucous carcinoma 151 artery 21 172–174, 175
mandible vs maxilla, issues of anatomic papillary construction after dental implant integrity of the buccal plate of bone
interest 22–24 therapy 117–120 173, 174
mandibular first bicuspid, internal armamentarium 117 integrity of the interproximal height of
microarchitecture 23 contraindications 117 bone 172–173
mandibular first molar, internal healing 119, 120 key factors in diagnosis of the surrounding
microarchitecture of furcation area 23 history 117 tooth support prior to
mandibular osteoporosis 16 indications 117 extraction 172–174
markers of bone formation, bone possible complications 119 root angulation/inclination and its
remodeling 12 postoperative instructions 119 relationship to the apical bone
markers of bone resorption, bone surgical indexing 119 topography 173–174, 175
remodeling 12 technique 117–119 pre‐operative vital signs chart, conscious IV
maxillary artery distribution 20 paraneoplastic pemphigus 141 sedation utilizing midazolam 6
maxillary bicuspid, internal parathyroid hormone (PTH), bone proliferative verrucous leukoplakia
microarchitecture 23 remodeling 13 (PVL) 149–150
maxillary first molar parulis 137, 138 pulse oximetry 6
internal microarchitecture of furcation pemphigus vulgaris 141 PVL (proliferative verrucous leukoplakia)
area 23 periodontitis 149–150
mature resting alveolar bone from core 24 bone implications 16 pyogenic granuloma 138
maxillary sinus periosteum 21, 22 bone remodeling 12
maxilla vs mandible, issues of anatomic peripheral giant cell granuloma 138, 139 quantitative computed tomography (QCT),
interest 22–24 peripheral ossifying fibroma 137, 138 bone density measuring technique 14
medication‐induced gingival overgrowth 144 periradicular surgery see apicoectomy quantitative ultrasound (QUS), bone density
medication‐induced pigmentation physical status, ASA physical status measuring technique 14
146–147 classification 5
melanoacanthosis (oral physiologic pigmentation 146 reactive gingival nodules, diagnosis and
melanoacanthoma) 148 Piezocision™ assisted orthodontics 35–42 treatment 139
melanotic macule 148 computer guided piezocision‐ ridge preservation, socket seal 193
mesio‐distal position, three‐dimensional orthodontics 35–37, 38 ridge preservation utilizing barrier
implant positioning 179, 181 contraindications for piezocision 42 membranes, socket seal 193–194
metastatic disease 151–152 dynamically guided piezocision 37–38 root amputation and hemisection, endodontic
MGJ (mucogingival junction) 26–28 incorporating piezocision in therapy 49
micro architecture of the bone/tooth multidisciplinary treatment 39–41 root canal therapy
relationship and the interface of soft and piezocision assisted orthodontics with endodontic therapy 44
hard connective tissues 21–24, 25 clear aligners 38, 39 treatment of failed 44
midazolam post‐operative care 41
see also conscious IV sedation utilizing potential complications 42 sanguinaria‐induced leukoplakia 149
midazolam technique 35, 36 SECTG see SubEpithelial Connective Tissue
characteristics 3 pigmented lesions 146–149 Graft
mucocele 139–140 amalgam tattoo 147–148 sedation depth, definition and levels 3, 4
mucogingival junction (MGJ) 26–28 medication‐induced pigmentation sedation using midazolam see conscious IV
mucous membrane (cicatricial) 146–147 sedation utilizing midazolam
pemphigoid 141–142 melanoacanthosis (oral melanoacanthoma) short implants, dental implants 123, 123,
148 131, 133, 134, 135
necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis (NUG) 153 melanotic macule 148 sinus augmentation using tissue‐engineered
necrotizing ulcerative periodontitis 153 oral melanoacanthoma bone 159–167
normal dental/alveolar vascular supply 22 (melanoacanthosis) 148 armamentarium 160
NUG (necrotizing ulcerative gingivitis) 153 oral melanocytic nevus 148, 149 contraindications 160
Index 235
sinus augmentation using tissue‐engineered SubEpithelial Connective Tissue Graft tissue architecture preservation 177
bone (cont’d ) (SECTG) 186–192 treatment options 175–177
harvesting procedure 160 apical guiding “marionette” suture tissue augmentation procedures,
healing 164, 165 189–190 options 182–183
history 159 bone graft procedure 191 tissue deficiencies, dental implants
indications 159 closure of the extraction socket 191–192 206–209, 209–210
postoperative management 160, recipient site preparation 188 same‐site, minimally invasive
163–164 requirements 186–187 surgery 209–210
sinus lift using autogenous mesenchymal socket seal 186–192 tissue volume
cells processed chairside 165–167 suturing techniques 188–191 availability and requirements
technique 160–164, 165 tissue augmentation at the time of tooth 169–172
tissue engineered bone discs 160–164, extraction 186–192 influence on the peri‐implant “pink”
165 tunnel preparation 188, 189 esthetics 169, 170
transplant implantation surgery 161–164, surgical operating microscope (SOM), toxic epidermal necrolysis (Lyell’s
165 endodontic therapy 43 disease) 143
treatment and expansion of periosteal surgical phase 198–203 trabecular bone, bone type 11
biopsies 160–161 membrane placement and training, intravenous conscious sedation 3
sinus lift using autogenous mesenchymal stabilization 200, 201 transplant implantation surgery, sinus
cells processed chairside 165–167 procedure for tack insertion 202–203 augmentation using tissue‐engineered
harvesting procedure 165, 166, 167 requirements and evolution of the bone 161–164, 165
infection of the grafted site and membrane periosteal releasing incisions 200–202 treatment planning, combined periodontal
exposure 165–167 soft tissue stabilization 203 and prosthodontic care 61–105
infraorbital nerve paresthesia 165 steps for periosteal stabilizing suture 202 diagnostic phase 64–65, 71–72, 79,
possible complications 165 surgical procedure 198–199 79–81, 88
swelling, bruising and bleeding 165 tacks and pin fixation 202 diagnostic phase (data collection)
site analysis and classification time of tooth removal 198 61–62
197–198, 199 suturing of the graft 203–205 final prognosis 63–104
site preparation, dental implants 125–129 simultaneous flap closure 204–205 initial periodontal phase 66, 73, 83
smoker’s melanosis 147 suturing techniques maintenance phase 71, 78, 103
socket seal 183–192 apical guiding “marionette” preprosthetic periodontal phase 67–69,
autogenous tissue for concomitant buccal suture 189–190 73, 77–78, 85–90, 92–97
volume augmentation and socket seal horizontal adaptive mattress suture 190 prognosis 71, 79, 103
procedures 186–192 positioning mattress suture 190–191 prosthetic phase 69–71, 71–75, 76–78, 76,
compromised sockets 192 SubEpithelial Connective Tissue Graft 82, 83, 84, 86, 87, 91–103
contraindications 183 (SECTG) 188–191 provisional phase 66–67, 76, 78, 79–81,
disadvantages of this technique 84–85, 90–91
185–186 tapping threads, dental implants 129 treatment planning phases 63, 65–66,
donor sites 183–184 three‐dimensional implant positioning 73, 83
flapless ridge preservation 192–193 179, 180
indications 183 apico‐coronal position 179, 181 vascular supply: macro and micro 19–21
recipient site preparation 183, 184 bucco‐palatal position safe‐zone green red verrucous carcinoma 151
requirements for the tissue/tissue diagram 179, 180 vitamin C, bone remodeling 13
substitute material 183 mesio‐distal position 179, 181 vitamin D, bone remodeling 13
ridge preservation 193 tissue augmentation at the time of tooth vitamin K, bone remodeling 13
ridge preservation utilizing barrier extraction
membranes 193–194 armamentarium 177 Wegener’s granulomatosis 146
stabilization of the graft 184–185 atraumatic tooth extraction 177–179 wound healing 29–32
SubEpithelial Connective Tissue Graft autogenous tissue for concomitant buccal angiogenesis 30, 31
(SECTG) 186–192 volume augmentation and socket seal bone 31–32
SOM (surgical operating microscope), procedures 186–192 dental implants 32
endodontic therapy 43 management of class I sockets 177–179 epithelial cells 30, 31
squamous cell carcinoma 150–151 SubEpithelial Connective Tissue Graft epithelial closure 32
stabilization of the graft 205 (SECTG) 186–192 fibroplasia 31
236 Index