Module 2 in Facilitating Learner Centered Learning 2022 2023
Module 2 in Facilitating Learner Centered Learning 2022 2023
Learning Outcomes
1. Apply principles of learner –centered teaching in planning instructional activities for
students.
Introduction
Hello dear learner! Welcome to another exciting course that will deepen your
understanding on how to become proficient in implementing a learner-centred teaching
approach.
In the last 20 years of research in the field of learner-centred teaching, the evidence
points strongly to bringing the students at the center or the focus of the learning process.
As a future teacher, you need to consider very well your students’ learning goals, the
subject matter they want students to learn, and select an appropriate pedagogical
approach that will really enable them to learn.
Activity
Take time to thoughtfully answer the checklist below for you to reflect on your prior
knowledge and experience related to student-centred teaching. Check your response
under the YES and NO column.
Yes No
1. Were you allowed by your teachers to set specific learning goals for
your self?
3. Have you experienced being asked by your teacher for your input or
opinion in deciding what topics to learn in a course?
Have you experienced being given a flexible date for submitting your
project?
Analysis
Let us now examine closely your response to the checklist.
1. Where did most of your responses fall in the checklist? More of Yes or more of No?
4. For items which you answered NO, which of these would you have liked to really have
or experience in the past? Why do you say so?
For items in the checklist which you responded to as yes, they are some clear examples
of your own experiences which reflect a learner-centered teaching approach. To know
more about the essential features of Learner-Centred Pedagogy, let us now turn to the
next section.
Abstraction
Learner Centered Teaching (LCT) has become a popular phrase among educators
nowadays. It has been named in several ways such as student-centred approach or
learner-centered pedagogy in many textbooks and journal articles. Looking at the
research literature surrounding learner-centred teaching in the past 20 years, a book
published in 2002 by Maryllen Weimer stands as one of the earlier attempts to
comprehensively discuss and define what is LCT about.
Balance of
Power
Evaluation
Responsibility Purpose &
of Learner Process
5
Features
Function of Role of
Content Teacher
Balance of Power
In a traditional classroom, the power to decide what lessons to discuss, what learning
activities students must engage in, and what assessment tasks to give mainly belongs to
the teacher with little input from students. On the other hand, in a student-centered
classroom, a teacher shares that power by consulting learners prior to making final
decisions.
The traditional exercise of power in the classroom often benefits the teacher more
than it promotes student learning. The uniform instructional approach or ‘one-size-fits-all’
concept certainly is more convenient on the part of the teacher who has worked hard in
planning, implementing, and assessing outcomes of learning. However, this uniform
approach has been criticized by scholars by being unresponsive to the diversity of needs,
interests, and readiness among students.
In order to balance power in the classroom, learners are frequently consulted and
given immediate and ongoing feedback by the teacher. The teacher empowers students
by giving them the opportunity to choose and make decisions like selecting among lesson
topics, choose learning activities, determine pace of learning, and select an assessment
task to demonstrate one’s mastery of targeted learning competencies.
Function of Content
Current research evidence from educational psychology calls for a change in the
function of curriculum content which should be less on covering it and more on using
content to develop a learner’s individual way of understanding or sense-making.
Teachers need to allow learners to raise their own questions,
generate their own answers or solutions.
another lesson. The more important practice here is to accommodate students’ differing
pace of learning. For instance, some students may be able to demonstrate they know
how to use a microscope in 1 hour while others need 2 hours of practice to demonstrate
proficiency in manipulating it.
With patient guidance and ongoing support from teachers, competency-based learning
would ensure that students advance to new material when they are ready, at their own
pace, whether they can move quickly or whether they need more time.
Constructivism theory brings the role of the teacher as that of a facilitator of learning,
not as the fountain of learning. He/she instead encourages students to explore multiple
knowledge sources, make sense of it, and personally organize the information taken from
different sources.
As generally observed, less knowledgeable and experienced learners will interact with
content in less intellectually robust ways, but the goal is to involve students in the process
of acquiring and retaining information.
This shifting view on the role of the teacher deemphasizes the focus on teaching
techniques and methods if they are considered separate from the subject matter and
learning structures of the discipline.
Maclellan finds that ‘the teacher is involved in clarifying the subject matter, offering
examples, or suggesting arguments for or against a point of view may minimize the
students’ need to think’ while, equally, ‘little engagement by the tutor, leaving students to
determine both what and how to learn without any criteria to judge their process, is
unsatisfactory, inefficient and makes a nonsense of formal, higher education as a planned
and designed system (Maclellan, 2008, p.418). Teachers must become comfortable with
changing their leadership style from directive to consultative-- from "Do as I say" to
"Based on your needs, let's co-develop and implement a plan of action.
In recent years, work on self-regulated learning has advanced, and the goal of 21st
century education ought to be the creation of independent, autonomous learners who
assume responsibility for their own learning.
Adults are known to be capable of self-directed learning and that continuous learning
occurs across their career span and lifetime.
Each student may require different ways of learning, researching and analysing the
information available. It establishes that students can and should be made responsible for
their own learning.
The learning skills acquired in basic education and higher education will be used
throughout the course of their professional and personal lives.
Students are encouraged to direct their own learning and to work with other students
on research projects and assignments that are both culturally and socially relevant to
them.
Class often starts with a mini-lesson, which then flows into students making choices
about what they need to do next to meet specific learning targets aligned to the
standards.
They have mechanisms for its collections and methods for evaluating it and acting on
it.
Institute. This study surveyed 12 public high schools in New England in terms of how they
apply learner-centered teaching in their classroom practices.
Learning Learning takes place beyond the traditional school day, and even
happens anytime, the school year.
anywhere Learning is also not restricted to the classroom.
Students take Students are engaged in their own success, as well as incorporate
ownership of their interests and skills into the learning process.
their learning
Kaput’s study reported that the majority of the participating schools were effective in
personalizing the learning of their students and creating an environment where students
took ownership of their learning. However, the study also found that the participating
schools struggled with implementing and practicing “anytime, anywhere learning” due to a
series of challenges that both teachers and administrators faced. Teachers from the
participating schools largely responded that student-centered learning promoted higher
student engagement and facilitated learning that was more relevant to students. Further,
a large percentage of the teachers contended that students in student-centered
environments explored the curriculum with more depth and retained knowledge more
effectively than in traditional settings.
The American Psychological Association (APA) published in 2015 its top 20 principles for
teaching and learning for basic education teachers. These principles were based on
decades of research on human learning and can well serve as lampposts for today’s
teachers on how to facilitate learner-centered teaching. A brief statement of APA on the
implications of the top 20 principles to current teaching practices is quoted below:
“Psychological science has much to contribute to enhancing teaching and learning in the
classroom. Teaching and learning are intricately linked to social and behavioral factors of
human development, including cognition, motivation, social interaction, and
communication”
As a future educator, the top 20 principles revolve around the following key concepts
to keep in mind whenever we design our instructional plans and implement them with our
students.
Application
It would be good at this time for you to personally find out how Filipino teachers are
currently practicing the student centred approach in teaching.
You may conduct a one-on-one interview with a new and seasoned teacher in your
school, or among your relatives and friends, or those within your neighborhood. List down
his or her practices in terms of applying the learner-centred teaching approach. Write their
responses on the table below:
New Teacher Seasoned Teacher
(below 5 years of teaching (more than 10 years of teaching
experience Experience)
After conducting the interview, what was the most interesting response you received
from your interviewees? Why do you say so?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
Closure
In Lesson 2, you will have a closer look at some available pedagogical approaches
that will equip you with a more practical ideas how to facilitate a learner-centered
classroom.
Learning Outcomes
Introduction
Prepare yourself for an exciting lesson on Learner-Centred Pedagogical Approaches.
I am sure you are very interested to understand how to really help your future students to
learn, which is basically the ultimate desire of every teacher. You are fortunate indeed to
have access to a number of teaching models and approaches that have already been
heavily researched. Let us now turn our attention to three pedagogical approaches that
are recognized as more learner-centred rather than teacher centered as was observed in
the traditional instructional approach.
Activity
Instructor/Facilitation Assessment
Source: Center of Excellence for Careers in Education
Check the item that most nearly describes an instructor’s interaction with you as a student
that reflects a more learner-centered approach.
After carefully answering the Instructor Facilitation assessment, refer to the answer key
posted at the end of the analysis section
Analysis
Let us now begin to deeply reflect on your response to the assessment. Try to briefly
answer to each question.
1. What do you consider as the most noticeable practice of a learner- centred instructor?
2. What do you also observe as the most noticeable practice of the teacher-centred
instructor?
4. On the other hand, if you had a more teacher-centred instructor, how would you feel
about your learning experience under such circumstances?.
To know more about the essential features of Learner-Centred Pedagogy, let us now turn
to the next section.
Abstraction
According to this image of teaching and learning, the ideal classroom for the 21st century
learners will no longer be one in which 30-50 students are always listening to the teacher
or silently working on their own. Although contemporary teaching practices still involve
lecture, drill, and practice, students need to be trained to work in alternative arrangements
such as:
talking to each other in small and large groups
making public their personal knowledge and beliefs
constructing and testing their knowledge with peers and teachers.
Among the popular instructional approaches that have been extensively researched
for more than two decades are the Cooperative Learning Approach, Differentiated
Instruction Approach, and the Personalized Learning Approach. A comparison of these 3
pedagogical approaches along with the traditional approach is shown in the table below
using the 5 essential elements of Learner-Centered Pedagogy by Weimer.
The Cooperative learning Approach (CLA) started becoming popular in the 1990’s in
an attempt to move away from traditional pedagogical approach that relied heavily on
uniform instruction for a large-sized classroom. The CLA used the social interdependence
theory, which proposes that the behavioral outcomes of a person are affected by their
own and others' actions. Said theory became the framework for designing
teaching-learning activities in peer group settings.
Johnson and Johnson (1994) described five factors that influence the effectiveness
of cooperation in classrooms which are shown in the figure below.
Positive Interdependence
Students commit to personal success as well as the success of every member of the
group. If students are having difficulties, their group mates are there to support them.
Positive interdependence can also promote motivation to learn, because students are
learning not just for themselves but also for the benefit of their groups.
Working in groups involved sharing information helping each other in doing the group
task so that they progress together.
The group is accountable for achieving its goals, and each member must be
accountable for contributing a fair share of the work toward the group goal.
Group members learn how to apply teamwork skills that has collaborative leadership,
making fair decisions. Students also develop friendship by building trust, communicating
freely, and resolving conflict.
Promotive Interaction
Students promote each other's success by sharing resources or information that will
help every member. Peers take time to encourage, and praise each other's efforts to
learn.
Group Processing
Group members need to feel free to communicate openly with each other to express
concerns as well as to celebrate accomplishments.
Learners take time to monitor and discuss how well they are achieving their goals and
maintaining effective working relationships.
Students frequently reflect and discuss on how well they are achieving their goals and
work to maintain effective working relationships.
Differentiating Content
Teachers may differentiate several learning tasks or pathways within the same
lesson that match the needs of specific students or student groups.
Teachers should hold all students to the same expectations and goals related to
mastery of essential content but may utilize different techniques and modified
activities to help each student meet outlined objectives (Bondie, Dahnke & Zusho,
2019).
Differentiating Process
In personalized Learning systems, instead of counting the number of hours students are
in their seats, students move through coursework and graduate based on their ability to
show they have mastered the material.
The United States National Education Technology Plan 2017 defines personalized
learning as follows:
Personalized learning refers to instruction in which the pace of learning and the
instructional approach are optimized for the needs of each learner. Learning objectives,
instructional approaches, and instructional content (and its sequencing) may all vary
based on learner needs.
Flexible Pathways
Learning plans are co-crafted by students with their parents and teachers which
best suit their needs, interests, and abilities. This plan creates a customized
approach that uniquely responds to the ability and interest profile of the learner.
Students are encouraged to identify their own interests, passions, and strengths
and integrate these, in partnership with educators, into meaningful learning
experiences with clear goals.
Competency standards are made clear to students at the beginning of the course
as well as and how these are to be assessed at the end.
Teachers must continuously assess student learning against clearly defined
standards and goals and students’ input into the assessment process is
essential.
Students must also have access to real-time feedback and performance data for
self-monitoring.
The table below provides a list of commonly applied teaching strategies under CLA, DIA
and PLA.
Application
Now that you have a better and deeper understanding of how a learner-centred
pedagogy approach looks like, it’s now a great time to integrate those lessons in our
personal belief system.
You are now task to create a PowerPoint Presentation showcasing your future
teaching practices that applies the elements, features and strategies of a learner
Centered Pedagogy. Try to provide a brief answer to each question in your slides and
present this to your peers and teacher.
Closure
Your patience and persistence finally paid off. Bravo for a job well done in finishing
lesson 2.2. I hope that by becoming aware of different approaches to facilitate a more
student-centered teaching, you now know how to design and plan your future teaching
practice in a way that would be best serve the diverse interest, needs and abilities of your
students.
In Lesson 2.3, you will learn about the evolution of learning theories that have served
as the backbone and framework of teaching practices. This lesson will help you see the
impact of the evolution of learning theories and its impact in shifting the field of education
Learning Outcomes
Introduction
With new researches, explanations provided but the basic principles of behaviorism
appeared not satisfy all learning scenarios. New theories came into view which
maintained some of the behaviorist concepts but excluded others, and added new ideas
which later came to be associated with the cognitive views of learning. The
neo-behaviorist, then, were transitional group, bridging the gap behaviorism and cognitive
theories learning.
Activity
ACTIVITY 1 (BEHAVIORISM)
1. Observation
a. Choose a place where you can observe adult-child interactions – such as mall, in
church, parks or at the playground, etc. Spend one hour observing such adult-child
interactions. Focus your attention on the stimulus – response – consequence patter
you observe.
b. Describe the consequences you observe. (It is better to write or scribble the details
on the spot or as soon as you finish your observation).
ACTIVITY 2 (CONNECTIONISM)
Law of Exercise
ACTIVITY 3
Working on Maze
ACTIVITY 4
Analysis
Activity 1: BEHAVIORISM
Answer the questions.
1. What kind of stimuli for children’s and adult behavior did you observe?
3. What kinds of behaviors on the part of children elicit reinforcement and punishment
consequences from the adult?
5. Given this experience, what are your thoughts about operant conditioning? Do you
think children reinforce and punish adults reinforce and punish them? How might the two
be interdependent?
1. How did you solve maze A.? What strategy did you use? (trial and error, examined the
maze before proceeding with your pen etc.
Abstraction
People learn through repetition. Learner is a passive blank slate shaped by
environmental stimuli, both positive and negative reinforcement. This topic helps you
understand behaviorism and its connection to learning reinforcement.
BEHAVIORISM
This particular learning theory assumes that the learner is essentially passive, simply
responding to their environmental stimuli. Behavioral theorists therefore believe that a
learner basically begins as a clean slate, and their behavior is shaped by
positive/negative reinforcement The theory of behaviorism focuses on the study of
observable and measurable behavior. It emphasizes that behavior is mostly learned
through conditioning and reinforcement (rewards and punishment). It does not give much
attention to the mind, and the possibility of thought processes occurring in the mind.
Contributions in the development of the behaviorist theory largely came from Pavlov,
Watson, Thorndike and Skinner.
Pavlov’s Experiment.
Before conditioning, ringing the bell (neutral stimulus) caused no response from the dog.
Placing dog food (unconditioned stimulus) in front of the dog initiated salivation
(unconditioned response). During conditioning, the bell was rung a few seconds before
the dog was presented with food. After conditioning, the ringing of the bell (conditioned
stimulus) alone produce salivation (conditioned response). This is classical conditioning.
Stimulus Generalization. Once the dog has learned to salivate at the sound of the bell, it
well salivate at the other similar sounds
Extinction. If you stop pairing the bell with the food, salivation will eventually cease in
response to the bell.
Discrimination. The dog could learn to discriminate between similar bells (stimuli) and
discern which bell would result in the presentation of food and which would not.
Higher-Order Conditioning. Once the dog has been conditioned to associate the bell
with food, another unconditioned stimulus, such as a light may be flashed at the same
time that the bell is rung. Eventually the dog will salivate at the flash of the light without
the sound of the bell.
CONNECTIONISM
Edward Thorndike (1898) is famous in psychology for his work on learning theory that
lead to the development of operant conditioning within Behaviorism. Whereas classical
conditioning depends on developing associations between events, operant conditioning
involves learning from the consequences of our behavior.
He placed a cat in the puzzle box, which was encouraged to escape to reach a scrap
of fish placed outside. Thorndike would put a cat into the box and time how long it took to
escape. The cats experimented with different ways to escape the puzzle box and reach
the fish.
Eventually they would stumble upon the lever which opened the cage. When it had
escaped it was put in again, and once more the time it took to escape was noted. In
successive trials the cats would learn that pressing the lever would have favorable
consequences and they would adopt this behavior, becoming increasingly quick at
pressing the lever.
Edward Thorndike put forward a “Law of effect” which stated that any behavior that
is followed by pleasant consequences is likely to be repeated, and any behavior followed
by unpleasant consequences is likely to be stopped.
Law of Effect
The Law of Effect stated that a connection between a stimulus and response is
strengthened when the consequence is positive (reward) and the connection between the
stimulus and the response is weakened when the consequence is negative. Thorndike
later on, revised this “law” when he found that negative reward, seemingly pleasurable
consequences do not necessarily motivate performance.
Law of Exercise.
Tell us that the more an S-R (stimulus response) bond in practice the stronger it will
become. “Practice makes perfect” seem to be associated with this. However, like the law
of effect, the law of exercise also had to revise when Thorndike found that practice
without feedback does not necessarily enhance performance.
Law of Readiness.
This states that, the more readiness the learner has to respond to the stimulus, the
stronger will be the bond between them. When a person is ready to a stimulus and is not
made to respond, it becomes annoying to the person. Example, if the teacher says, “Okay
we will now watch the movie (stimulus) you’ve been waiting for.” And suddenly the power
goes off, the
students will feel frustrated because they were ready to respond to the stimulus but were
prevented from doing so. Likewise, if the person is not at all ready to respond to stimuli
and is asked to respond, that becomes annoying. For instance, the teacher asks the
question and expects the students to respond right away when he is still not ready. This
will be annoying to the student. This is why teacher should remember to say the question
first, and wait for a few seconds before calling on anyone to answer.
Usually, people who worked on a maze activity, which you just did, would say they found
the second maze easier. This is because they say that the two mazes were identical,
except that the entrance and exit points had been reversed. Their experience in Maze A
was much easier for them to answer Maze B. People are building mind maps of events
that they perceived. These mental maps help them to respond to other things or tasks
later, particularly if they see the similarity. You may start responding with trial and error
(behavioral), but later on your response becomes more internally driven (cognitive
perspective). This is what neo-behaviorism is all about. It has behavioral aspects, but it
also has a cognitive perspective.
There are two neo-behaviorism-reflecting theories that stand out. Edward Tolman's
purposive behaviorism and Albert Bandura's theory of social learning. Both theories are
influenced by behaviorism (focused on internal elements and learning).
Purpose behaviorism has also been referred to as sign learning theory and is often
seen as a link between behaviorism and cognitive theory. Tolman 's theory was based on
the psychological views of the Gestalt Psychologist and the behaviorist John Watson.
Tolman's form of behaviorism underscored the relationship between stimuli rather than
stimulus-response. Tolman said that a new stimulus (sign) would be associated with
already meaningful stimuli (significant ones) through a series of pairings; there was no
need for reinforcement to establish learning. In your labyrinth activity, the new stimulus or
"sign" (maze B) has become associated with the already meaningful stimulus, the
signicate (maze A). So you may have connected the two stimuli, Labyrinth A and
Labyrinth B, and used your knowledge and experience in Labyrinth A to learn how to
respond to Labyrinth A.
This is a learning theory that was in response to behaviorism. Psychologist who promoted
this idea claimed that behaviorism failed to explain cognition. In this theory, mind is an
This is the learning theory that was taught in developing online education using Blooms
Taxonomy. Examples of cognitivist strategies for learning higher-level thinking are
starting a lesson with a hook to create interest, a review quiz to promote prior learning,
using learning outcomes, chunking content into organized bite-sized pieces, using
graphic organizers, and the student takes on an active role on learning. The teacher gives
lots of encouragement and positive feedback.
The social learning theory of Bandura emphasizes the importance of observing and
modeling the behaviors, attitudes, and emotional reactions of
others. Bandura (1977) states: “Learning would be exceedingly
laborious, not to mention hazardous, if people had to rely
solely on the effects of their own actions to inform them what to
do. Fortunately, most human behavior is learned
observationally through modeling: from observing others one
forms an idea of how new behaviors are performed, and on
later occasions this coded information serves as a guide for
action. Social learning theory explains human behavior in
terms of continuous reciprocal interaction between cognitive,
behavioral, an environmental influences.
1. People can learn by observing the behavior of the others and the outcomes of those
behaviors.
People are often to reinforced for modeling the behavior of others. Bandura suggested
that the environment also reinforces modeling. This is several possible ways;
1. The observer is reinforced by the model
2. The observer reinforce by a third person
3. The imitated behavior itself leads to reinforcing consequences
4. Consequences of the model’s behavior affect the observer’s
behavior vicariously.
1. Attention – mental focus or concentration, willingness of the child to observe and mimic
the behavior of a model.
2. Retention – To encode the behavior in the memory, ability to store information.
3. Motor Production – To actually perform the behavior observe
4. Motivation/Reinforcement – Force that drives one to act.
COGNITIVISM
What is Cognitivism?
Cognitive theories stress the acquisition of knowledge and internal mental structures
and, as such, are closer to the rationalist end of the epistemology continuum (Bower &
Hilgard, 1981). Learning is equated with discrete changes between states of knowledge
rather than with changes in the probability of response. Cognitive theories focus on the
conceptualization of students’ learning processes and address the issues of how
information is received, organized, stored, and retrieved by the mind. Learning is
concerned not so much with what learners do but with what they know and how they
come to acquire it (Jonassen, 1991b). Knowledge acquisition is described as a mental
activity that entails internal coding and structuring by the learner. The learner is viewed as
a very active participant in the learning process.
The cognitive approach focuses on the mental activities of the learner that lead up to
a response and acknowledges the processes of mental planning, goal-setting, and
organizational strategies (Shuell, 1986). Cognitive theories contend that environmental
“cues” and instructional components alone cannot account for all the learning that results
from an instructional situation. Additional key elements include the way that learners
attend to, code, transform, rehearse, store and retrieve information. Learners’ thoughts,
beliefs, attitudes, and values are also considered to be influential in the learning process
(Winne, 1985). The real focus of the cognitive approach is on changing the learner by
encouraging him/her to use appropriate learning strategies.
Classroom Implications
In a classroom environment, there are many variables that influence and contribute to
learning. When creating and implementing a learning environment, it is imperative that
the teachers not only create a setting that promotes learning, but also take the time to
understand each child. Classrooms are widely diverse and complex. Students learn
differently and are at various developmental levels. Teachers who properly manage their
classrooms and establish expectations will be able to incorporate diverse teaching
philosophies and create an excellent learning environment for each student. It is
important that teachers create a learning environment that encourages students to do
their best and makes learning interesting. This creates a motivational climate within the
classroom.
There are two factors that are critical to motivate students, value and effort.
(Classroom Management) Students must understand that the work they are performing is
worthwhile. Value measures the importance of a student's work to himself and others.
Effort is the amount of time and energy students put into their work. Understanding the
value of academic tasks and the effort needed to complete those tasks can motivate
students to perform better in the classroom environment (Classroom Management)
Teachers should carefully assess the current stage of a child's cognitive development
and only assign tasks for which the child is prepared. The child can then be given
tasks that are tailored to their developmental level and are motivating.
Teachers must provide children with learning opportunities that enable them to
advance through each developmental stage. This is achieved by creating
Cognitive games are designed to help stimulate various regions of the brain. These
games are used to improve reflexes, help people learn, promote critical thinking, and help
people learn different patterns of association. Cognitive games are helpful when used to
learn a foreign language and memorize new material. Various learning techniques are
used in the classroom because there are various learning styles. There are many games
that promote and influence cognitive learning. Examples of cognitive games include:
Flash Cards
Flash cards can be used various tasks. This involves notecards or an even scrap of
paper in which two parts of information is written on either side of the notecard. These can
be as simple as having cards with a red dot on one side and the word red on the other.
Flash cards are typically used in a classroom for drills or in private study. These cards are
used to aid memorization. Pre-made flash cards are available for many subjects.
Teachers and students may also make homemade flash cards, depending on how and
what they are studying. Flash cards may also be personalized and printed from certain
websites. (Flashcards) Flash cards can be utilized into various games as well.
Board Games
Puzzles
CONSTRUCTIVISM
In this unit you will be introduce to many of the issues understanding and applying
constructivism and constructivist principles for instructional design purposes.
Students learn new things through experience. They build knowledge through
experiences and interactions. In cognitive learning, the students are taught to do
something in constructivism. The students are encouraged to discover something on their
own; this is known as self-directed learning. The major difference is that cognitive learning
is about building on prior knowledge, and constructivism is about building new ideas and
concepts based on your own discoveries.
Constructivism's central idea is that human learning is constructed, that learners build
new knowledge upon the foundation of previous learning. This prior knowledge influences
what new or modified knowledge an individual will construct from new learning
experiences (Phillips, 1995).
The second notion is that learning is an active rather than a passive process. The
passive view of teaching views the learner as ‘an empty vessel’ to be filled with
knowledge, where constructivism states that learners construct meaning only through
active engagement with the world (such as experiments or real-world problem solving).
Information may be passively received, but understanding cannot be, for it must come
from making meaningful connections between prior knowledge, new knowledge, and the
processes involved in learning.
Each individual learner has a distinctive point of view, based on existing knowledge
and values.This means that same lesson, teaching or activity may result in different
learning by each pupil, as their subjective interpretations differ.This principle appears to
contradict the view the knowledge is socially constructed. Fox (2001, p. 30) argues (a)
that although individuals have their own personal history of learning, nevertheless they
can share in common knowledge, and (b) that although education is a social process,
powerfully influenced by cultural factors, nevertheless cultures are made up of sub-
cultures, even to the point of being composed of sub-cultures of one. Cultures and their
knowledge-base are constantly in a process of change and the knowledge stored by
individuals is not a rigid copy of some socially constructed template. In learning a culture,
each child changes that culture.
The constructivist theory posits that knowledge can only exist within the human mind,
and that it does not have to match any real world reality (Driscoll, 2000). Learners will be
constantly trying to develop their own individual mental model of the real world from their
perceptions of that world. As they perceive each new experience, learners will continually
update their own mental models to reflect the new information, and will, therefore,
construct their own interpretation of reality.
Social constructivism was developed by Lev Vygotsky (1978, ) who suggested that,
every function in the child's cultural development appears twice: first, on the social level
and, later on, on the individual level; first, between people (interpsychological) and then
inside the child (intrapsychological).
Radical constructivism was developed by Ernst von Glasersfeld (1974) and states that
all knowledge is constructed rather than perceived through senses. Learners construct
new knowledge on the foundations of their existing knowledge. However, radical
constructivism states that the knowledge individuals create tells us nothing about reality,
and only helps
us to function in your environment. Thus, knowledge is invented not discovered. The
humanly constructed reality is all the time being modified and interacting to fit ontological
reality, although it can never give a ‘true picture’ of it. (Ernest, 1994)
Scaffolding is a key feature of effective teaching, where the adult continually adjusts
the level of his or her help in response to the learner's level of performance. In the
classroom, scaffolding can include modeling a skill, providing hints or cues, and adapting
material or activity (Copple & Bredekamp, 2009).
Tam (2000) lists the following four basic characteristics of constructivist learning
environments, which must be considered when implementing constructivist teaching
strategies:
1) Knowledge will be shared between teachers and students.
2) Teachers and students will share authority.
Application
Now let us turn to applying what we have learned about learning theories that guide
the teaching practice of educators like your. As an example, try thinking of how to apply
Thorndike’s Connectionism by following the instructions below.
Closure
Congratulations learner for finishing this lesson! You may have arrived already at a
conclusion at this point that there is no single or perfect learning theory that applies to
every student. What is more important to remember is that, for the novice learner,
behaviorism will be applied to novice learner where they study fact based on information,
cognitivism will be applied to established learner where they make connections using fact
based information, while constructivism will be applied to sophisticated-learners where
they use fact based information and knowledge of connections to create greater
understanding of a content area.
The typical classroom has myriads of learners who have different experiences, needs
and learning styles. Teaching and learning methodologies have to be constantly revised,
changed and modified. Therefore, different learning theories should be utilized to
accommodate a variety of learner, in order to create an environment that will be beneficial
to both the teacher the learners.
You are about to begin Lesson 4 in the next page. This lesson will help you
understand why becoming knowledgeable about learner- centred pedagogical
approaches and knowing the learning theories on which they are founded will help you
successfully develop your skill-set or teaching competencies. The said teaching
competencies of a Filipino teacher like you in the near future are expected to become
Learning Outcomes
1. Set out clear expectations of teaching standards for professional development from
beginning to distinguished career stage of teachers;
2. Actively embrace a continuing effort to attaining teaching proficiency; and
3. Apply uniform measure to assess teacher performance, identify needs, and provide
support for professional development
Introduction
In desiring to become a teacher someday, you will in fact play a crucial role in nation
building. Put in mind that through quality teachers, the Philippines can develop holistic
learners who are steeped in values, equipped with 21st century skills, and able to propel
the country to development and progress. Once you graduate and become a licensed
professional teacher, you will now be an official member of the community of educators in
the country. Under the Department of Education’s VISION of producing: “Filipinos who
passionately love their country and whose values and competencies enable them to
realize their full potential and contribute meaningfully to building the nation” (DepED
Order No. 36, s. 2013).
Keep in mind, dear future teacher, that so much research evidences unequivocally
show that good teachers are vital to raising student achievement, i.e., quality learning of
your students is will be dependent upon learner-centered teaching. Hence, enhancing
yourself in terms of in the 7 domains of teaching practice reflected in the Philippine
Professional Standards for Teachers should become of utmost importance to you.
Activity
Identify the qualities of professional teacher. Fill in the concept organizer below.
The Professional
Teacher
As As
Individual Professional
Analysis
Activity 1
1. Based from the concept map you’ve made, describe a professional teacher as
provided in the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers.
Activity 2
1. What are the qualities a professional teacher should have as an individual and as a
professional?
2. Which is more important, the professional or the personal attribute of a teacher? Why?
3. What should be the first and most important quality of a good teacher?
Abstraction
The Philippine Government has consistently pursued teacher quality reforms through
a number of initiatives. As a framework of teacher quality, the National
Competency-Based Teacher Standards (NCBTS) was institutionalized through CHED
Memorandum Order No. 52, s. 2007 and DepED Order No. 32, s. 2009. It emerged as
part of the implementation of the Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda (BESRA), and
was facilitated by drawing on the learning considerations of programs, such as the Basic
Education Assistance for Mindanao (BEAM), the Strengthening Implementation of
Visayas Education (STRIVE) project and the Third Elementary Education Project (TEEP).
The K to 12 Reform (R.A. 10533) in 2013 has changed the landscape of teacher
quality requirements in the Philippines. The reform process warrants an equivalent
supportive focus on teacher quality – high quality teachers who are properly equipped
and prepared to assume the roles and functions of a K to 12 teacher.
The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers defines teacher quality in the
Philippines. The standards describe the expectations of teachers’ increasing levels of
knowledge, practice and professional engagement. At the same time, the standards allow
for teachers’ growing understanding, applied with increasing sophistication across a
broader and more complex range of teaching/learning situations.
The following describes the breadth of 7 Domains that are required by teachers to be
effective in the 21st Century in the Philippines. Quality teachers in the Philippines need to
possess the following characteristics:
Recognize the importance of mastery of content knowledge and its
interconnectedness within and across curriculum areas, coupled with a sound
and critical understanding of the application of theories and principles of teaching
and learning. They apply developmentally appropriate and meaningful pedagogy
grounded on content knowledge and current research. They display proficiency
in Mother Tongue, Filipino and English to facilitate the teaching and learning
process, as well as exhibit the needed skills in the use of communication
strategies, teaching strategies and technologies to promote high-quality learning
outcomes.
Provide learning environments that are safe, secure, fair and supportive in order
to promote learner responsibility and achievement. They create an environment
that is learning-focused and they efficiently manage learner behavior in a
physical and virtual space. They utilize a range of resources and provide
intellectually challenging and stimulating activities to encourage constructive
classroom interactions geared towards the attainment of high standards of
learning.
Interact with the national and local curriculum requirements. They translate
curriculum content into learning activities that are relevant to learners and based
on the principles of effective teaching and learning. They apply their professional
knowledge to plan and design, individually or in collaboration with colleagues,
Value personal growth and professional development and exhibit high personal
regard for the profession by maintaining qualities that uphold the dignity of
teaching such as caring attitude, respect and integrity. They value personal and
professional reflection and learning to improve their practice. They assume
responsibility for personal growth and professional development for lifelong
learning.
The 7 Domains of teacher practice comprise of 37 strands that refer to more specific
dimensions of teacher practice.
Domain 1
Content Knowledge &Pedagogy
(7 strands)
Domain 2
Environment (6 stands)
Domain 3
Diversity of Learners (5 strands)
Domain 4
Curriculum and Planning (5 strands)
Domain 5
Assessment and Reporting (5 strands)
Domain 6
Community Linkages and Professional Engagement (4 strands)
Domain 7
Personal Growth and Professional Development (5 strands)
1. Philosophy of teaching
2. Dignity of teaching as a profession
3. Professional links with colleagues
4. Professional reflection and learning to improve practice
5. Professional development goals
The following statements, which define the work of teachers at different career stages,
make explicit the elements of high-quality teaching for the 21st century. They comprise
descriptors that have been informed by teachers’ understandings of what is required at
each of the four Career Stages. The descriptors represent a continuum of development
within the profession by providing a basis for attracting, preparing, developing and
supporting teachers.
Career Stage 1 or Beginning Teachers have gained the qualifications recognized for
entry into the teaching profession. have a strong understanding of the subjects/areas in
which they are trained in terms of content knowledge and pedagogy. possess the
requisite knowledge, skills and values that support the teaching and learning process.
manage learning programs and have strategies that promote learning based on the
learning needs of their students. seek advice from experienced colleagues to consolidate
their teaching practice.
Career Stage 4 or Distinguished Teachers embody the highest standard for teaching
grounded in global best practices. exhibit exceptional capacity to improve their own
teaching practice and that of others. recognized as leaders in education, contributors to
the profession and initiators of collaborations and partnerships. create lifelong impact in
the lives of colleagues, students and others. consistently seek professional advancement
and relevance in pursuit of teaching quality and excellence. exhibit commitment to inspire
the education community and stakeholders for the improvement of education provision in
the Philippine.
Application
At this point , after knowing the 7 domains of teaching considered as standards of the
professional practice of teachers, as well as the career stages we go through over time,
you may now check yourself in terms of how far you have developed already at this time.
Use the checklist below to find out.
NY= Not Yet, I believe I have not yet developed any competency in this domain
Reflection Question:
1. For domains in which you answered SOMEWHAT or NOT YET, what will you do in
order to develop the teaching competencies
under those domain?
3. Can you develop to yourself progress from a beginner teacher stage to a distinguished
teacher in 10-15 years?
Closure
Let us continue to deepen your understanding of your future learner by turning to module
3.
Module Summary
References
Bondie, R.S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How does changing “one-size-fits-all” to
differentiated instruction affect teaching?. Review of Research in Education, 43, pp.
336–362. DOI: 10.3102/0091732X18821130
McCarthy, E.M., Liu, Y. & Schauer, K.L. (2020). Strengths based blended personalized
learning: An impact study using virtual comparison group, Journal of Research on
Technology in Education, 52:3, 353-370, DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2020.1716202
Olofson, M.W., Downes, J.M., Smith, C., LeGeros, L., & Bishop, P.A. (2018) An
Instrument to Measure Teacher Practices to Support Personalized Learning in the
Middle Grades, RMLE Online, 41:7, 1-21, DOI: 10.1080/19404476.2018.1493858
Senate Committee on Education. Act 77. An act relating to encouraging flexible pathways
to secondary school completion., Pub. L. No. S130 (2013). Retrieved from
http://www.leg.state.vt.us/ docs/2014/Acts/ACT077.pdf
Tam (2000) “What are the features of a Constructivist Classroom?. 2 (23) 25-30
Tomlinson,C., Brighton, c., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C., Moon, T., Brimijoin, L.,
Zmuda, A, Curtis, G. & Ullman, D. (2015). Learning personalized: The evolution of the
contemporary classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Adopted Source: Facilitating Learner-Centered Teaching, Module for Project Write RO XI S.Y. 2020-2021