Unit III Erp
Unit III Erp
MRP begins with a schedule for finished goods that is converted into a schedule of
requirements for the subassemblies, component parts, and raw materials needed to
produce the finished items in the specified time frame. Thus, MRP is designed to
answer three questions: What is needed? How much is needed? and When is it needed?
The primary inputs of MRP are a bill of materials, which tells the composition of a
finished product; a master schedule, which tells how much finished product is desired
and when; and an inventory records file, which tells how much inventory is on hand
or on order. The planner processes this information to determine the net requirements
for each period of the planning horizon. Outputs from the process include planned-
order schedules, order releases, changes, performance-control reports, planning
reports, and exception reports.
PRODUCTION PLANNING & SCHEDULING CHAPTER - 5
Master Production
Schedule
A bill of materials file contains a listing of all of the assemblies, subassemblies, parts,
and raw materials that are needed to produce one unit of a finished product. Thus,
each finished product has its own bill of materials. The listing in the bill of materials is
hierarchical; it shows the quantity of each item needed to complete one unit of its
parent item. The nature of this aspect of a bill of materials is clear when you consider
a product structure tree which provides a visual depiction of the subassemblies and
components needed to assemble a product.
Inventory record file refer to stored information on the status of each item by time
period. This includes gross requirements, scheduled receipts, and expected amount
on hand. It also includes other details for each item, such as supplier, lead time,
and lot size policy. Changes due to stock receipts and withdrawals, canceled
orders, and similar events also are recorded in this file.
For proper and errorless MRP, all the inputs and records must be accurate.
MRP in services
MRP has applications in services as well as in manufacturing. These applications may
involve material goods that form a part of the product–service package, or they may
involve mainly service components.
An example of a product–service package is a food catering service, particularly in
instances that require preparing and serving meals for large numbers of people. To
estimate quantities and costs of an order, the food manager would have to determine
the quantities of the ingredients for each recipe on the menu (i.e., a bill of materials),
which would then be combined with the number of each meal to be prepared to obtain
a material requirements plan for the event. Similar examples occur for large-scale
renovations, such as a sports stadium or a major hotel, where there are multiple
repetitions of activities and related materials and their components for purposes of cost
estimation and scheduling
PRODUCTION PLANNING & SCHEDULING CHAPTER - 5
Requirements of MRP
In order to implement and operate an effective MRP system, it is necessary to have
1. A computer and the necessary software programs to handle computations
and maintain records.
2. Accurate and up-to-date
a. Master production schedule
b. Bills of materials
c. Inventory records
3. Integrity of file data
MRP II
Manufacturing resources planning (MRP II)
MRP was developed as a way for manufacturing companies to calculate more precisely
what materials were needed to produce a product, and when and how much of those
materials were needed. MRP II evolved from MRP in the 1980s because manufacturers
recognized additional needs. MRP II did not replace or improve MRP. It expanded the
scope of materials planning to include capacity requirements planning, and to involve
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
other functional areas of the organization such as marketing and finance in the planning
process.
In addition to the obvious manufacturing resources needed to support the plan, financing
resources will be needed and must be planned for, both in amount and timing. Similarly,
marketing resources also will be needed in varying degrees throughout the process. In
order for the plan to work, the firm must have all of the necessary resources available as
needed. Often, an initial plan must be revised based on an assessment of the availability of
various resources. Once these have been decided, the master production schedule can be
firmed up.
A capacity plan translates the output plan into input terms approximating how much of the
available capacity will be consumed. Though basic capacity is fixed, management can
manipulate the short term capacities by various ways like workforce management (addition or
depletion), by subcontracting or by using multiple work shifts to adjust the timing of overall
outputs. As a result aggregate capacity plan balances output levels, capacity constraints and
temporary capacity adjustment to meet demand.
The capacity planning process begins with a proposed or tentative master production schedule that
must be tested for feasibility and possibly adjusted before it is kicked off. The proposed schedule is
processed using MRP to ascertain the material requirements the schedule would generate. These are
then translated into resource (i.e., capacity) requirements, often in the form of a series of load reports
for each department or work center, which compares known and expected future capacity
requirements with projected capacity availability. It shows expected resource requirements (i.e.,
usage) for jobs currently being worked on, planned orders, and expected orders for the planning
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
horizon. Given this sort of information, the manager can more easily determine whether capacity is
sufficient to satisfy these requirements. If there is enough capacity, he or she can freeze the portion of
the master production schedule that generates these requirements. Sometimes, it appears possible to
accommodate demand by slightly shifting some orders to adjacent periods. An overload appears can
be handled by shifting some jobs to adjacent time periods. In cases where capacity is insufficient, a
manager may be able to increase capacity (by scheduling overtime, transferring personnel from other
areas, or subcontracting some of the work) if this is possible and economical, or else revise the master
production schedule and repeat the process until an acceptable production schedule is obtained.
ERP
Business organizations are complex systems in which various functions such as
purchasing, production, distribution, sales, human resources, finance, and accounting must
work together to achieve the goals of the organization. However, in the functional
structure used by many business organizations, information flows freely within each
function, but not so between functions. That makes information sharing among functional
areas burdensome. Enterprise resource planning is a computer system that integrates the
financial, manufacturing and human resources on a single system. ERP represents an
expanded effort to integrate standardized record keeping that will permit information
sharing among different areas of an organization in order to manage the system more
effectively.
ERP software provides a system to capture and make data available in real time to
decision makers and other users throughout an organization. It also provides a set of tools
for planning and monitoring various business processes to achieve the goals of the
organization. ERP systems are composed of a collection of integrated modules. There are
many modules to choose from, and different software vendors offer different but similar
lists of modules. Some are industry specific, and others are general purpose. The modules
relate to the functional areas of business organizations. For example, there are modules
for accounting and finance, HR, product planning, purchasing, inventory management,
distribution, order tracking, finance, accounting, and marketing. Organizations can select
the modules that best serve their needs and budgets.
To integrate financial data—As the CEO tries to understand the company's overall
performance, he or she may find many different versions of the truth. Finance has its own
set of revenue numbers, sales has another version, and the different business units may
each have their own versions of how much they contributed to revenues. ERP creates a
single version of the truth that cannot be questioned because everyone is using the same
system.
plan prior to develop MPS. The process of translating aggregate plan into individual product plans
is called ‘disaggregating’. During disaggregating, many problems have been faced. Therefore,
master production schedule (MPS) is prepared using ‘Trial and error approach’.
For example, the aggregate product used in certain company's aggregate plan is made up of
three families A, B and C and each family has various models. This disaggregating must then be
repeated as we decompose the plan for each family into production plans for individual items.
This disaggregation process is not a simple procedure because there are several steps in the
process and variety of tradeoffs that must be made before a final item by item production
schedule is obtained. When we allocate company's planned production of 250,000 (let) units in
certain month to the three product families, should it make 150,000 units of family A? If we
allocate too much production to family A, company may not be able to meet the demand for
items in families B and C during same month. If we allocate 100,000 units of production to
family A, we must still decide whether to produce all 100,000 units at one time or divide this
production into two or three separate runs. Finally, for a run of each family, we must allocate
production to each item within the family and sequence production of individual items in
families B and C during same month.
b) Developing MPS: Master production schedule can be developed in various form. Sometimes it
can be developed on the basis of demand of output and some time on the basis of raw material.
Whereas some time it can be developed or prepared for simplicity without considering demand
and raw material required for product. A simple format of MPS for a week is given below:
Master Production Schedule for a week
Days
Products
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total
A 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 14
B 10 - 10 - 10 - 10 40
C 15 10 5 20 - 20 8 82
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
The table shows that "A" product started from Sunday and each day produced 2 units to produce
14 units a week. Product "B" started from Sunday and it produced on alternate day with fix
quantity of 10 units. Similarly product "C" also started from Sunday and it can be produced in
flexible quantity as per the favor of condition.
including determination of facilities and other resources within the constraints of aggregate
plan.
For example, the aggregate schedule might call for 1000 units in planning period 1, where the
planning period might be a month or six month period. If there is only one product, master
schedule include production schedule of the same however if there is more than one product
master schedule would indicate the quantity of each products to be produced in each planning
period, consistent with aggregate schedule.
Again, scheduling for mass production system is the preparation of master production schedule
(MPS) which can meet the demand of individual product of products group. If the products are
producing in the form of project, then each activity are presented in diagrammatic form
showing their logical sequence of task to be performed with the help of CPM and PERT. Both
CPM and PERT are the network analysis tools and both operates in same manner, but CPM are
used for repetitive nature of project where as PERT are used for "R & D" nature of project which
are very expressive and time consuming.
Objectives in Scheduling of mass production
Meet customer due dates
Minimize job lateness
Minimize overtime
Maximize machine or labor utilization
Minimize response time
Minimize completion time
Minimize time in the system
Minimize idle time
Minimize work-in process inventory
(iii) Scheduling for Batch Production: Batch production system is the mixed form of job-shop and
continuous production system. Under this, production functions are done with a certain size and
quantity but may not continue forever. When consumptions are less than production, then batch
production system is suitable for any organization. The strong feature of this types of
production system is that, productions are done up to a predetermined inventory level only.
After finishing one lot size of production, second lot's production is started and there may be
some periodic gap between the production of one lot and another lot.
A batch production falls between job shop production and continuous production. It is a
common type of production system where the output is kept as inventory and is produced in
substantial volume. An example of batch production is bottling of gin, vodka, rum and other
similar products. The management must decide how many cases of vodka in a given bottle size
should be bottled at one time and when the processing of the batch should begin.
A trade off in the determination of the lot size for an item is to create the balance between set up
cost and inventory cost of holding. Another equally important consideration is the requirement
to produce feasible schedules that meets the demand of all items. For examples, if set up cost are
low relative to holding cost, production in small lot size is preferable.
The scheduling for batch production system is prepared after determining lot size of production.
For Example Bottlers Nepal Ltd produces 20 lakhs bottles of cocacola in a year, then there must be
lot size determined as 10 lacks bottles twice in a year or 500,000 bottles 4 times in a year. But while
determining lot size, the set up cost and inventory handling cost should be considered by an
Operations manager.
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Capacity Planning
The ability of utilizing efficiency of organization in terms of producing maximum output in a certain
time period is called capacity. In other words it means the ability to hold, receive, store and
accommodate. It is the critical consideration for long term strategy. It is generally measured in terms
of volume of output per unit of time. It is always focused on determining overall capacity level of
capital intensive resources like land, labor, equipment, facilities which support the long term
competitive organizational strategy.
Capacity planning is the process of determining the capacity requirements in future. Operations
management is concerned with the determining capacity requirements in terms of time dimensions.
It is concerned with matching the company's production capability with customer demand in the
most profitable way. This planning should take into account not only for facility, production, and
distribution cost, but also for lost of sales due to the inability to supply on time and any revenue gains
due to quick response.
planning becomes the first step to think about. Once capacity is evaluated and a need for a new or
expanded facility is assessed, facility location and process technology activities occur. Excessive
capacity would require exploring ways to reduce capacity like temporary closing, selling or
consolidating facilities. Consolidation may involve relocation, a combination of technologies or a
rearrangement of equipment or processes. Capacity is a major consideration for operational strategy.
The reasons for the need of capacity planning are as follows:
It determines the availability of goods to meet customer’s demand.
It affects cost efficiency of operations.
It determines the investment required.
Measurement of Capacity
Capacity is often defined as the capability of an object, whether that is a machine, work center or
operator, to produce output for a specific time period. Many companies ignore the measurement of
capacity, assuming that their facility has enough capacity, but that is often not the case. Increasingly
software programs like enterprise resource planning (ERP) and warehouse management systems
(WMS) calculate throughput based using formulas that are dependent on capacity.
Companies measure capacity in different ways using either the input, output or a combination of the
both as the measure.
For some organization, capacity is simple to measure. For example, Dairy Development Corporation
measures the capacity on the basis “tons of cheese per year” and automobiles company measures the
capacity on the basis of “number of automobiles per year”. However, it is difficult to find a common
unit of output for those organizations whose products lines are more diversified. In this case,
capacity can be expressed in terms of input as a substitute. For example:
A legal office may express capacity in terms of the number of attorneys employed per year.
A custom job shop or an auto repair shop may express capacity in terms of available labor hours
or machine hours per week or month or year.
Thus, capacity may be measured in terms of outputs or the inputs of the conversion process. Some
common examples of capacity measures are given below:
Measures of Operating Capacity
Types of Organization Output Measures
Automobile manufacturers Number of autos
Steel producer Tons of steel
Power Company Megawatts of electricity
Cannery Tons of foods
Brewery Liters of beer
Types of Organization Input Measures
Airline Number of seats
Warehouse Square or cubic meter of storage
Job shop Labor or machine hour
Merchandising Square meter of display or sales area
Movie theatre Number of seats
Restaurant Number of seats or tables
University Number of students and/or faculties
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Sometimes it is difficult to measure capacity in real sense because of day to day variations. For
examples, employees are absent or late, equipments break down, facility down time is required for
maintenance and repair, machine setups are required or the products change over, and vacation
must be scheduled. Since all these variations occur from time to time, the capacity of a facility can
rarely be measured precisely. Thus measurements of capacity should be interpreted carefully.