Rubric for Witten Report

Criteria Outstanding Satisfactory Developing Beginning

topic/title directly relevant & related to somewhat relevant & remotely relevant & related irrelevant & totally unrelated
program of students (10) related to program of to program of students (5) to program of students (3)
students (8)
format specified format followed (10) a few (1 to 3) format errors many format (more than 3) specified format not followed
(8) errors (5) (3)
excellent organization (points organized (content some content placed inappropriate content (3)
organization are logically ordered & appropriate to all sections of incorrectly in the report (5)
enhances readability & report but points are
understanding of the report) somewhat jumpy) (8)
(10)
quality of information provided supports some details of the details of the information information provided not
information details specific to the topic (15) information provided do not provided are somewhat able to find specific details
support the topic (12) sketchy & do not support the (5)
topic (8)
aesthetics texts, tables, figures so clear texts, tables, figures are some portions are sloppy & unacceptable appearance
and understandable as to readable and difficult to read; style needs (for example: tables & figures
enhance report impact; style understandable ;style is improvement (3) cannot be read or
enhances readability (5) acceptable (4) understood) ; style unclear
(2)
timeliness report submitted on time (5) report submitted 1 day after report submitted 2 days after report submitted 3 days after
deadline (4) deadline (3) deadline (2)
Highest possible score = 55 points

Reference:
https://academic.csuohio.edu/duffy_s/Rubrics.pdf
https://studylib.net/doc/8044205/rubric-for-written-report
Rubric for Presentation & Reporting

Criteria Outstanding (8 pts) Satisfactory (6 pts) Developing (4 pts) Beginning (2 pts)

able to deliver & present keyable to deliver & present able to deliver & present unable to present key
delivery of report findings & answer questions key findings & answer key findings but cannot ideas & findings, and
competently questions clearly & answer questions clearly cannot answer questions
precisely & precisely clearly & precisely
quality of presentation main points are few main points are not some main points are not most main points are not
information, clear & well developed, clear & not well clear & not well clear & not well
content & information is linked to developed, few developed, some developed, most
presentation topic; speaker information are not information are not linked information are not linked
organization
provides appropriate linked to presentation to presentation topic ; to presentation topic ;
contents for the task topic; speaker focuses speaker includes some speaker focuses primarily
primarily on relevant irrelevant content on irrelevant content
content
creativity manifested to a very great manifested to a great manifested to a little manifested to a very little
extent (very original extent (some originality extent (little or no extent (repetitive with
presentation of material; apparent; good variety variation; material very little or no variety;
captures the audience’s and blending of materials presented with little insufficient use of
attention) / media) originality or materials / media)
interpretation)
teamwork collaboration is manifested collaboration is collaboration is manifested collaboration is manifested
to a very great extent (flow manifested to a great to a little extent (flow of to a very little extent (flow
of presentation is very extent (flow of presentation seems to be a of presentation is
smooth) presentation is smooth) bit disturbed ) disturbed)
Length of within two minutes of within four minutes of within six minutes of too long or too short; ten
Presentation allotted time allotted time. allotted time or more minutes above or
below the allotted time
Highest possible score = 40 points

References:
http://makinglearningreal.org/pdfs/scoring_rubric.pdf
https://www.uen.org/rubric/previewRubric.html?id=19