Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
• Description p.1
• Audience p.1
• Abstracting and Indexing p.2
• Editorial Board p.2
• Guide for Authors p.4
ISSN: 2467-981X
DESCRIPTION
.
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical
practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical
series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation
of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative
research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational
role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.
Types of manuscripts for consideration include: educational reviews and expert-consensus clinical
practice guidelines, original research papers (including papers reporting normative data), extended
case reports, systematic reviews, editorials, and Letters to the Editor.
As a journal devoted to education and evidence-based clinical practice in the specialty, the
priorities for Clinical Neurophysiology Practice differ from those of our companion IFCN journal
Clinical Neurophysiology. Novelty is a critical issue for research-focused journals such as Clinical
Neurophysiology, but is less important for Clinical Neurophysiology Practice. Quality papers may be
rejected by research-focused journals because the studies do not report new advances in knowledge
or are of low (research) impact, or because studies are deemed incremental, confirmatory, negative
or outside journal priorities. However in clinical practice negative studies may be just as important
as positive studies, and well-conceived papers reporting negative data or confirmatory results are
welcome because clinical advances need confirmation before they are introduced into clinical care.
Similarly, case reports can be particularly educational and are welcome. Case reports must have a
neurophysiological focus and illustrate the diagnostic process, using figures that are of high quality.
These reports are not specifically limited in length, the number of figures or the number of references.
AUDIENCE
.
Web of Science
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
Google Scholar
Embase
Scopus
PubMed Central
Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
EDITORIAL BOARD
.
Editor-In-Chief
Margitta Seeck, Geneva University Hospitals Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva, Switzerland
Founding Editor
David Burke, Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital,Sydney Medical School,The University of
Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Associate Editors
Nortina Shahrizaila, University of Malaya Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
ENMG, muscle ultrasound
Niels Focke, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
EEG, Epilepsy
Hatice Tankisi, Aalborg University Hospital Neurology Department and Neurophysiology Department, Aalborg,
Denmark
ENMG, motor neuron disease
Josep Valls-Solé, Universitat de Barcelona Institute of Neurosciences, Barcelona, Spain
ENMG, psychophysiology
Nick Kane, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
EEG, Epilepsy
Editorial Board Members
Jayant Acharya, Neuroscience Institute Southern Illinois School of Medicine, Springfield, United States of
America
Steward Boyd, University College London, Institute of Child Health, Clinical Neuroscience, London, United
Kingdom
Luís Caboclo, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Şão Paulo, Brazil
ICU EEG, Continuous EEG monitoring, EEG and prognostication, Epileptic encephalopathies
Edvard Ehler, Pardubice Hospital, Pardubice, Czechia
Andrew Eisen, The University of British Columbia Department of Medicine Division of Neurology, Vancouver,
Canada
Montserrat Gerez-Malo, Spanish Hospital, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Carlos Heise, Sao Paulo University Department of Neurology, SAO PAULO, Brazil
Peter W. Kaplan, Johns Hopkins Medicine Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Baltimore, United States
of America
EEG, Coma, Encephalopathy, Nonconvulsive Status
Jae-Moon Kim, Chungnam National University Hospital Department of Neurology, Daejeon, South Korea
Letizia Leocani, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy
Mingsheng Liu, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
Maggie Marsh-Nation, Alpha eLearning Development and Instructional Design LLC, Kerrville, United States
of America
Janice Massey, Duke University Hospital, Durham, United States of America
Daniel Menkes, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, United States of America
Shabbir Hussain I. Merchant, Harvard Medical School Department of Neurology, Charlestown, United States
of America
Anna Rostedt Punga, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Neurophysiology, neuromuscular junction, myasthenia gravis
Valia Rodríguez, Cuban Neuroscience Centre, Clinical & Applied Neuroscience Division, Havana, Cuba
Masahiro Sonoo, Teikyo University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine Department of Neurology,
Itabashi-Ku, Japan
Neuromuscular electrodiagnosis, concentric needle EMG, nerve conduction studies, somatosensory
evoked potentials, neurology, functional neurological disorders
Armando Tello, National Autonomous University of Mexico Neurocampus, Ciudad de México, Mexico
INTRODUCTION
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice is a stand-alone Open Access journal devoted to improving education
and practice in the specialty. It is a companion journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, the official journal
of the IFCN. Its focus is on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology, including relevant new
research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. Clarity of methods and
careful presentation of techniques and findings are important aspects for manuscripts submitted to
Clinical Neurophysiology Practice since they determine what clinical best practice is and serve the
educational mission of the journal.
Although novelty is more valuable for a research-orientated journal than for a practice-orientated
journal, all studies published in Clinical Neurophysiology Practice must stand on their own and make
a substantial contribution to the literature. Reports on negative studies can be important, but the
authors should make it clear in the report why the negative findings are clinically important. Studies
in animals are of low priority unless they provide significant new insights into neurophysiological
procedures, and the submission letter should indicate why the submission is relevant to the practice
of this specialty.
Manuscripts are considered for publication on the understanding that the material has not been
previously published, except in abstract form, that it is not simultaneously under consideration by any
other journal, and that the text is original. The Editors reserve the prerogative of requiring the original
data from the authors to compare with the supplied illustrations or results. If accepted, the manuscript
shall not be published elsewhere in the same form, in either the same or another language, without
the consent of the authors and Publisher. Along with all Elsevier journals, all submissions are checked
using specific software (CrossCheck) to identify if text is similar to text in previous publications by
the same or other authors.
Types of Article
The journal welcomes
• Full-length original articles. Methodological/technical reports and studies reporting normative data
on healthy subjects are welcome, provided that they represent an advance on current knowledge
and particularly if they are likely to change clinical practice. Studies that replicate information in the
literature should indicate why it is important to replicate the findings.
• Case reports. The reported cases must be relevant to the practice of clinical neurophysiology
and illustrate the diagnostic process, using figures that are of high quality. These reports are not
specifically limited in length, the number of figures or the number of references.
• Review articles and updates on how to perform diagnostic procedures and their clinical value are
generally by invitation, authored by acknowledged experts in the field, and require a comprehensive
and up-to-date survey of a specific area of clinical practice. Unsolicited reviews should be pre-
approved by the Editors. For review articles, structuring the abstracts is not needed.
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the evidence for diagnostic and monitoring (and
therapeutic) procedures are not categorised as authoritative Reviews and do not require Editorial
approval before submission. We treat systematic reviews and meta-analyses as original research
reports, and they should conform to the normal manuscript format, including a structured Abstract.
• Letters to the Editor. Letters may be comments on papers published in this journal, but may present
original research or raise issues of relevance to clinical practice. There should be no abstract, and the
text should be continuous text, with paragraphs but no subsections. Accordingly, subtitles should not
be used. Unless authorised by the handling Editor, the word count should be less than 1000 words,
with one Figure plus/minus one Tables. The number of References should be limited to 5-10.
• Announcement(s) of appointments or of meetings relevant to readership of the journal.
• Editorials are commissioned by the Editors
While original articles, case reports, systematic reviews and reviews are not limited in length,
authors are encouraged to write succinctly, avoid repetitions, jargon, neologisms and abbreviations.
In particular, this journal cautions against the use of non-standard abbreviations because they make
the text difficult to read and may require the reader to refer back to find the definition. Eliminating
all abbreviations does not increase the lengthy of a manuscript significantly.
All manuscripts submitted to Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, including Letters and Editorials, are
subject to peer review and acceptance is never guaranteed. When appropriate, additional review for
statistical adequacy may also be obtained. Decisions of the Editors are final.
Submission checklist
You can use this list to carry out a final check of your submission before you send it to the journal for
review. Please check the relevant section in this Guide for Authors for more details.
One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details:
• E-mail address
• Full postal address
Further considerations
• Manuscript has been 'spell checked' and 'grammar checked'
• All references mentioned in the Reference List are cited in the text, and vice versa
• Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including the
Internet)
• A competing interests statement is provided, even if the authors have no competing interests to
declare
• Journal policies detailed in this guide have been reviewed
• Referee suggestions and contact details provided, based on journal requirements
Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution outside the institution
and for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations (please consult
https://www.elsevier.com/permissions). If excerpts from other copyrighted works are included, the
author(s) must obtain written permission from the copyright owners and credit the source(s)
in the article. Elsevier has preprinted forms for use by authors in these cases: please consult
https://www.elsevier.com/permissions.
Author rights
As an author you (or your employer or institution) have certain rights to reuse your work. For more
information see https://www.elsevier.com/copyright.
Elsevier supports responsible sharing
Find out how you can share your research published in Elsevier journals.
PREPARATION
Peer review
This journal operates a single anonymized review process. All contributions are typically sent to a
minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor
is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's decision
is final. Editors are not involved in decisions about papers which they have written themselves or have
been written by family members or colleagues or which relate to products or services in which the
editor has an interest. Any such submission is subject to all of the journal's usual procedures, with
peer review handled independently of the relevant editor and their research groups. More information
on types of peer review.
Use of word processing software
It is important that the file be saved in the native format of the word processor used. The text
should be in single-column format. Keep the layout of the text as simple as possible. Most formatting
codes will be removed and replaced on processing the article. In particular, do not use the word
processor's options to justify text or to hyphenate words. However, do use bold face, italics, subscripts,
superscripts etc. When preparing tables, if you are using a table grid, use only one grid for each
individual table and not a grid for each row. If no grid is used, use tabs, not spaces, to align columns.
The electronic text should be prepared in a way very similar to that of conventional manuscripts (see
also the Guide to Publishing with Elsevier). Note that source files of figures, tables and text graphics
will be required whether or not you embed your figures in the text. See also the section on Electronic
artwork.
To avoid unnecessary errors you are strongly advised to use the 'spell-check' and 'grammar-check'
functions of your word processor.
Sufficient detail should be supplied that others can repeat the experiments. For procedures that
have been described in full in previous publications, it is appropriate to abbreviate the details of the
procedures, provided that appropriate references are given. However readers should not have to refer
to these publications to understand what was done.
A legend should comprise a brief title (not on the figure itself) and a description of the illustration.
Keep text in the illustrations themselves to a minimum but explain all symbols and abbreviations used.
Tables
Please submit tables as editable text and not as images. Tables can be placed either next to the
relevant text in the article, or on separate page(s) at the end. Number tables consecutively in
accordance with their appearance in the text and place any table notes below the table body. Be
sparing in the use of tables and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results
described elsewhere in the article. Please avoid using vertical rules and shading in table cells.
References
Reference links
Increased discoverability of research and high quality peer review are ensured by online links to the
sources cited. In order to allow us to create links to abstracting and indexing services, such as Scopus,
Crossref and PubMed, please ensure that data provided in the references are correct. Please note that
incorrect surnames, journal/book titles, publication year and pagination may prevent link creation.
When copying references, please be careful as they may already contain errors. Use of the DOI is
highly encouraged.
A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it as a permanent link to any electronic article.
An example of a citation using DOI for an article not yet in an issue is: VanDecar J.C., Russo R.M.,
James D.E., Ambeh W.B., Franke M. (2003). Aseismic continuation of the Lesser Antilles slab beneath
northeastern Venezuela. Journal of Geophysical Research, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000884.
Please note the format of such citations should be in the same style as all other references in the paper.
Web references
As a minimum, the full URL should be given and the date when the reference was last accessed. Any
further information, if known (DOI, author names, dates, reference to a source publication, etc.),
should also be given. Web references can be listed separately (e.g., after the reference list) under a
different heading if desired, or can be included in the reference list.
Data references
This journal encourages you to cite underlying or relevant datasets in your manuscript by citing them
in your text and including a data reference in your Reference List. Data references should include the
following elements: author name(s), dataset title, data repository, version (where available), year,
and global persistent identifier. Add [dataset] immediately before the reference so we can properly
identify it as a data reference. The [dataset] identifier will not appear in your published article.
Preprint references
Where a preprint has subsequently become available as a peer-reviewed publication, the formal
publication should be used as the reference. If there are preprints that are central to your work or that
cover crucial developments in the topic, but are not yet formally published, these may be referenced.
Preprints should be clearly marked as such, for example by including the word preprint, or the name
of the preprint server, as part of the reference. The preprint DOI should also be provided.
References in a special issue
Please ensure that the words 'this issue' are added to any references in the list (and any citations in
the text) to other articles in the same Special Issue.
Below are a number of ways in which you can associate data with your article or make a statement
about the availability of your data when submitting your manuscript. If you are sharing data in one of
these ways, you are encouraged to cite the data in your manuscript and reference list. Please refer to
the "References" section for more information about data citation. For more information on depositing,
sharing and using research data and other relevant research materials, visit the research data page.
Data linking
If you have made your research data available in a data repository, you can link your article directly to
the dataset. Elsevier collaborates with a number of repositories to link articles on ScienceDirect with
relevant repositories, giving readers access to underlying data that gives them a better understanding
of the research described.
For supported data repositories a repository banner will automatically appear next to your published
article on ScienceDirect.
In addition, you can link to relevant data or entities through identifiers within the text of your
manuscript, using the following format: Database: xxxx (e.g., TAIR: AT1G01020; CCDC: 734053;
PDB: 1XFN).
Data statement
To foster transparency, we encourage you to state the availability of your data in your submission.
This may be a requirement of your funding body or institution. If your data is unavailable to access
or unsuitable to post, you will have the opportunity to indicate why during the submission process,
for example by stating that the research data is confidential. The statement will appear with your
published article on ScienceDirect. For more information, visit the Data Statement page.
AFTER ACCEPTANCE
Online proof correction
To ensure a fast publication process of the article, we kindly ask authors to provide us with their proof
corrections within two days. Corresponding authors will receive an e-mail with a link to our online
proofing system, allowing annotation and correction of proofs online. The environment is similar to
MS Word: in addition to editing text, you can also comment on figures/tables and answer questions
from the Copy Editor. Web-based proofing provides a faster and less error-prone process by allowing
you to directly type your corrections, eliminating the potential introduction of errors.
If preferred, you can still choose to annotate and upload your edits on the PDF version. All instructions
for proofing will be given in the e-mail we send to authors, including alternative methods to the online
version and PDF.
We will do everything possible to get your article published quickly and accurately. Please use this
proof only for checking the typesetting, editing, completeness and correctness of the text, tables and
figures. Significant changes to the article as accepted for publication will only be considered at this
stage with permission from the Editor. It is important to ensure that all corrections are sent back
to us in one communication. Please check carefully before replying, as inclusion of any subsequent
corrections cannot be guaranteed. Proofreading is solely your responsibility.
AUTHOR INQUIRIES
Visit the Elsevier Support Center ([email protected]) to find the answers you need. Here you will
find everything from Frequently Asked Questions to ways to get in touch.
You can also check the status of your submitted article or find out when your accepted article will
be published.
© Copyright 2018 Elsevier | https://www.elsevier.com