BB 107 (Spring) Tutorial 11 Q
BB 107 (Spring) Tutorial 11 Q
BB 107 Tutorial 11
Part A: MCQ
3. In the long run, new firms will enter a monopolistically competitive industry:
A. Provided economies of scale are being realized.
B. Even though losses are incurred in the short run.
C. Until minimum average total cost is achieved.
D. Until economic profits are zero.
D. blocked.
1. Explain verbally and graphically how price (rate) regulation may improve
the performance of monopolies. In your answer distinguish between (a)
socially optimal (marginal‐cost) pricing and (b) fair‐return (average‐total‐cost)
pricing. What is the “dilemma of regulation”?
for the firm to survive, public subsidies out of tax revenue would be
necessary. Another option for regulators is to allow a fairreturn price which
would allow the firm to break even economically (cover all costs including a
normal profit). Setting price equal to ATC would deliver Qf output and only
partially solve the underallocation of resources. Despite this dilemma
regulation can improve on the results of monopoly from the social point of
view. Price regulation (even at the fair-return price) can simultaneously
reduce price, increase output, and reduce the economic profits of monopolies
No, the proposal does not consider that the output of the natural monopolist
would still be at the suboptimal level where P > MC. Too little would be
produced and there would be an underallocation of resources. Theoretically,
it would be more desirable to force the natural monopolist to charge a price
equal to marginal cost and subsidize any losses. Even setting price equal to
ATC would be an improvement over this proposal. This fair-return pricing
would allow for a normal profit and ensure greater production than the
proposal would.
In monopolistic competition there are many firms but not the very large
numbers of pure competition. The products are differentiated, not
standardized. There is some control over price in a narrow range, whereas
the purely competitive firm has none. There is relatively easy entry; in pure
competition, entry is completely without barriers. In monopolistic
competition, there is much nonprice competition, such as advertising,
trademarks, and brand names. In pure competition, there is no nonprice
competition.
In pure monopoly there is only one firm. Its product is unique and there are
no close substitutes. The firm has much control over price, being a price
maker. Entry to its industry is blocked. Its advertising is mostly for public
relations.
4
5. Explain fully what product differentiation may involve. Explain how the
entry of firms into its industry affects the demand curve facing a
monopolistic competitor and how that, in turn, affects its economic
profit.
Product differentiation may well only be in the eye of the beholder, but
that is all the monopolistic competitor needs to gain an advantage in
the market—provided, of course, the consumer looks upon the
assumed difference favorably. The real differences can be in quality, in
services, in location, or even in promotion and packaging, which brings
us back to where we started: possibly nonexistent differences. To the
extent that product differentiation exists in fact or in the mind of the
consumer, monopolistic competitors have some limited control over
price, for they have built up some loyalty to their brand.
When economic profits are present, additional rivals will be attracted
to the industry because entry is relative easy. As new firms enter, the
demand curve faced by the typical firm will shift to the left (fall).
Because of this, each firm has a smaller share of total demand and now
faces a larger number of close-substitute products. This decline firm’s
demand reduces its economic profit.