Circuit Building Blocks
Circuit Building Blocks
2.1 !ntroduction
The basic idea is to take two transistors and to connect them in a special
way to produce a three-terminal composite device of much larger current
gain. If npn and pnp transistors can be used, there are four possible circuit
arrangements with this property (Figure 2.1). Of the circuits shown, (a) and
(b) are called "Darlington pairs", and (c) and (d) are called "complementary
Darlingtons" as they use complementary transistors. It is easy to see which
terminal must be the emitter of the composite transistor in each case - it
must be the one passing the most current, since 1" :16 * 1". Careful inspection
of the circuits also reveals that the composite transistor is in all four cases
of similar type (npn or pnp) to the first of its two transistors: thus (a) and
(d) are npn, while (b) and (c) are pnp. A simple calculation shows that for
a Darlington pair of type (a) or (b):
31
32 Electronics, Noise and Signal Recovery
(c) (d)
Fig. 2.1 Darlington and complementary Darlington circuits. Here (a) and (b) are
Darlington pairs, and (c) and (d) are complementary Darlingtons. Note that in all
cases the single equivalent transistor is of the same type (npn or pnp) as the
first
transistor of the pair.
Next we consider the white emitter follower (Figure 2.2). This circuit is
useful when feeding a low-impedance load and a fast response is needed for
positive andnegative-going waveforms. The lower transistor operates between
the output connection and the ground, and is capable of pulling the output
voltage down rapidly. The upper transistor operates between the output
connection and the upper voltage rail, and is capable of pulling the output
voltage up rapidly. This second transistor acts as an emitter follower circuit,
while the lower transistor acts as a normal common emitter amplifier.
However, a complication arises since the lower transistor inverts the input
signal: to overcome this problem, the lower transistor is fed from the collector
of the upper transistor. Various capacitors and resistors are also required in
order to ensure that both transistors operate under appropriate conditions.
To avoid some of these complications, an alternative version of the circuit
was devised, using a complementary pair of transistors (Figure 2.3). Notice
Circuit Building Blocks 33
Fig. 2.3 Modified White emitter follower. This circuit is a White emitter follower
modified so as to cut down the number of coupling capacitors and bias resistors.
However, closer scrutiny shows that it can also be regarded as an emitter follower
constructed using a slightly modiflred complementary Darlington.
34 Electronics, Noise and Signal Recovery
Fig. 2.5 Elimination of crossover distortion. (a) The voltage transfer characteristic
for the circuit of Figure 2.4.The crossover distortion near the origin can largely be
eliminated by sliding the characteristics for the individual transistors relative to one
another, until their sum approximates closely to a straight line through the origin,
as in (b). This is achieved using the modified bias circuit of Figure 2.6.
cc
Fig.2.6 Modilied bias circuit for eliminating crossover distortion. Notice the small
resistors in series with the emitters of the two transistors. These give extra linearity
and thus help to eliminate crossover distortion.
Fig.2.7 More satisfactory bias circuit for the complementary emitter follower. In
this case the bias circuit uses a Zo" multiplier, as shown in more detail in Figure 2.8.
to cancel any multiple of vo". The vo. multiplier will be described in detail
below. Meanwhile, the complete circuit for a practical complementary emitter
follower is shown in Figure 2.7 . rn chapter 5 we shall see how a complete
audio amplifier can be built with this type of output circuit.
4l
Fig.2.8 Zo"multiplier.
Circuit Building Blocks 37
n:(T)n" (2.3)
The reason for the name "I/0" multiplier" is now obvious. The circuit has
two notable features:
l. V.may readily be adjusted to any convenient value by means of a single
presettable potentiometer.
2. The temperature dependence of. Y. is identical to that of the Vo" of any
transistor. For these reasons the circuit is ideal for cancelling out the
Zo" voltages of other transistors, as in the circuit of Figure 2.7.
An important factor in the use of the above circuit is its dynamic resistance
p. This may be calculated by assuming that there is an a.c. voltage uo across
the circuit, deducing the current through R, and io, and then calculating i"
and the total a.c. current io. Thus we lind:
where we have eliminated R, using equation (2.3). For any given %, this
expression is clearly minimized by reducing R, as far as possible. However,
below a certain point, most of the current would be flowing through the
resistor chain, and on the contrary, we require the circuit to act as a chain
of diodes: thus most of the current must come from the collector. For this
to be so, R, must obey the condition:
Rr>>h,"1(p + 1) (2.s)
x(Y.lVo")h"l(§+r) (2.7)
38 Electronics, Noise and Signal Recovery
Thus p has the value h"l$+l) for Yo:Vo", and increases approximately
linearly with increase of %. In fact, the a.c. voltage drop remains about the
same proportion of the d.c. voltage drop as Zo increases - a quite reasonable
result. It is of interest that equation (2.7) predicts values for p of 20,40,60
and 80Q at V":3,6,9 and 12V respectively for a BC107 at I.:25mA:
these values of p contrast with dynamic resistances 120, 27,25 and 35 o for
a typical series of Zener diodes with the same nominal voltages. Evidently,
the vo" multiplier is of value mainly for producing relatively small voltage
drops - especially when these are not integral multiples of 0.6 v. However,
to obtain a voltage drop of 1.2Y, for a circuit such as that of Figure 2.7,
R, and R, would typically both be - 70 Q, and p would be about 8 e.
Before leaving this section, note that the predictions of p are based on the
simplified model expressed by equations (2.5) and (2.6). However, the
important point is that the design can be optimized: furthermore, there is a
tradeoff in the design between dynamic resistance p (which should be low)
and temperature dependence (which should be close to that of a diode).
clearly, there is more subtlety in this simple circuit than there first appears
to be!
p:h,"1(B + l) (2.8)
i.:(ur-0")/R,:ut(l-av)/R. (2.9)
Hence the effective input impedance introduced by the bias resistor is:
Since a, for an emitter follower is close to unity, Zrn,"is many times larger
than R.. This means that a relatively small R., which will not reduce
significantly the d.c. bias current provided by the main bias resistors R, and
Rr, will be adequate to bring the emitter voltage input impedance back to
quite a high value. For example, in a case where R": 1 kO, Rl - Rz :20 kO,
R,:2kQ, and §:200, Zr^will be increased from -10kQ to -200kO by
this circuit arrangement.
Fig. 2.11 Paralleled transistors. Here a small resistor (typically - 1O) is placed in
series with each emitter, thereby stabilizing the individual emitter currents. This is
actually an example of negative feedback (see Chapter 5).
Circuit Building Blocks 41
or remotely controlled radio tuners. One of the main problems with variable
capacitors is the small range over which they can be varied: this is because
stray capacitances limit the range of capacitances to factors (C^ JC^i,)
typically between 10 and 20 (note that even smaller factors in frequency
range result when these capacitors are used in tuned circuits, because of the
square root relation f :lpnJLq. In addition, variable inductors are
difficult to produce, and also large inductors and capacitors are bulky and
expensive. Hence there is considerable merit in having circuits which can
simulate inductors and capacitors, especially if these can be constructed
conveniently using resistors and low-value capacitors, together with active
circuit elements such as transistors.
The circuit of Figure 2.13 acts as an artificial inductor. To understand its
operation, consider the various currents and voltages:
ü:ub"+R(rb *jaCuo")
:ia(hi"+ R +j@CR/ri")
Fig. 2.13 Artificial reactance circuit. The circuit shown in this figure acts as an
artificial inductor. Note that this is an idealized circuit and that d.c. bias circuitry is
not included in the diagram.
Circuit Building Blocks 43
where we have assumed that R>>/r,", which is normally valid for R greater
than a few kilohms. This equation implies that the transistor is acting as an
inductor of value CRhkl P in series with a resistance of value Rl P, as suggested
above. What is happening is that a small capacitive control voltage at the
base, coupled with the natural inverting characteristic of the transistor, is
making it act as an inductor.In a similar way, by interchanging the capacitor
and the resistor, the transistor can be made to act as a capacitor. A formal
proof of this is left as an exercise for the reader.
In this circuit (Figure 2.14) two matched FETs are joined together in a
symmetrical way and fed with signals of opposite phase. (Note that signals
of equal amplitude and opposite phase may be obtained with the l-transistor
phase-splitting circuit mentioned in Section 1.6, with R":R".) The FET is
known to have an approximately square-law transfer function:
:V66-2R16"" t+21
vp
+4+
vr" T*)
:Vy-kVt2 (2.20)
where k and Vn arc constants. In practice, voltage level setting circuits can
eliminate V*, and then the circuit becomes a true square-law function
generator. Such circuits are useful for performing functions such as measuring
power or forming part of analogue multiplying circuits, based on the
"quarter-squares" principle, the latter being given by the following equation:
Clearly, two square-law function generator circuits are required to build such
a multiplier, and in addition an adder and two subtractors are required.
2.12 Summary
This chapter has described a number of useful circuit building blocks. These
have included various emitter follower configurations (the White emitter
follower, the complementary emitter follower, and the bootstrapped emitter
follower), the Darlington and complementary Darlingtbn conhgurations, and
the Vo" multiplier, most of which will prove useful later on when designing
audio frequency and d.c. amplifiers and operational amplifiers (see Chapters
5 and 8). Other circuits discussed were parallelled transistors and the
beanstalk amplilier - these being useful when circuits have to withstand
currents or voltages greater than the rated values of the transistors to be
employed - and artificial reactance circuits (useful, e.g., for generating
frequency-modulated signals) and the square-law function generator.
Although some of these circuits might seem trivial at first, they embody
important principles. In addition, a number of them illustrate the extra degree
of freedom available to the designer when complementary devices (e.g. npn
and pnp transistors) can be employed. This contrasts with the situation in
the early days of radio when thermionic valves had to be used, and electrons
were the only charge carriers that could be invoked.
Circuit Building Blocks 45
2.13 Bibliography
2.14 Problems
1. Give a full derivation of equations (2.4) and (2.7) for the dynamic
impedance of a Vo. multiplier. Also, obtain an alternative version of
equation (2.7) in which R, is approximated as the geometric mean of h,"
and hr"l(B + 1) in order to satisfy equations (2.5) and (2.6). Does this
alternative equation predict significantly different values of p at voltages
Vo:3,6,9 and l2Y?
2. Use the theory of Section 1.7 to determine the basic voltage gain of an
emitter follower. Hence obtain a corrected value for the input impedance
of a bootstrapped emitter follower (see equation 2.10). How accurate are
the numerical predictions of Section2.T for the increase in input impedance
of an emitter follower produced by bootstrapping?
3. Following the methods of Section 2.10, find a formula for the effective
capacitance of an artificial capacitor circuit. What gain in capacitance is
achievable with this circuit, assuming reasonable resistor values? Show
that this gain in capacitance could be improved considerably with an
FET-based circuit.
4. It was assumed in Section 2.ll that identical FETs have to be used to
form a squareJaw function generator. Show that this is not so, and that
mis-matched FETs can be used if the input voltages are suitably adjusted.
46 Electronics, Noise and Signal Recovery