COPING MECHANISMS OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AND TEACHERS
IN WESTERN TABUK DISTRICT EXPERIENCING DIFFICULTY
ON BLENDED LEARNING
A Thesis Proposal
Presented to
The Faculty of the Graduate School
KALINGA STATE UNIVERSITY
Tabuk City, Kalinga
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree
MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATION
ELENOR MAY CHANTAL L. MESSAKARAENG
CHAPTER I
THE PROBLEM
Background of the Study
The deadly threat of the Corona Virus also known as COVID-19, has hit the whole
world, which poses as a threat to the lives of everyone and has affected the economy of every
country. This has shaken up the education sector, in fear of not being able to conduct face to face
classes because of the virus and has reached globally. Several schools and colleges have stopped
operating face to face especially now with the surge of new protocols and restrictions placed to
ensure the safety of everyone. The virus, has forced schools to resort to other ways to still
continue the continuous learning of the students despite not seeing face to face (Dhawan, S.
2020). This situation is one of those days where people should have humanity and unity.
Schools have resorted to flexible learning system to reduce the spread of the virus. This
type of system has provided students with sufficient ways and has met their demands and needs
in aspects such as accessibility. However, technology is needed in this type of learning.
Nowadays, schools have opted for the use of Blended learning (BL), defined as a combination
of limited face-to-face (F2F), distance learning and online learning, which is a concept that is
increasingly being adopted in higher education institutions in response to some of the
contemporary social, economic, and pedagogical difficulties (Heilporn, G, et. al, 2013). Many
authors have addressed the notion of blended learning, and it has a wide range of implications.
did a thorough examination of some of the definitions associated with BL They give both general
and conservative definitions as well as more detailed and technology-related ones. According to
Borg (2003), social, psychological and environmental realities of the school and classroom,
which include parents, principals' requirements, the school, society, curriculum mandates,
classroom and school layout, school policies, colleagues, standardized testing, and the
availability of resources are factors that "may hinder language teachers' ability to adopt practices
which reflect their beliefs" (p.95).
Blended learning is linked to a number of arguments. Some of the grounds for online
pedagogy include accessibility, cost, flexibility, learning pedagogy, life-long learning and policy.
It is said that online learning is simple to use and that it can even reach rural and remote
locations. In terms of transportation, lodging, and the overall expense of institution-based
learning, it is considered to be a significantly less expensive way of education (Dhawan, S.
2020). With the advancement of digital technologies, BL is becoming more popular in higher
education, combining the benefits of synchronous contacts with online flexibility in terms of
time, place, and even study pace (Boelens et al., 2017, 2018; Johnson, 2019; Seaman et
al., 2018). But what if the students or teachers have difficulty in their stability to the internet
connection? Or even other things that are hindering them from having ease in this online set-up.
Even going to and from school to get learning packages is a huge risk to the students since there
would be fear in spreading the virus. Despite the expanding number of upgrades that the blended
learning has brought, it is not all going really well.
Students and teachers often experience online difficulties during these trying times using
this new type of learning. Experiencing problems with connectivity, poor signal in their specific
places and even insufficient gadgets and the hardship of going to school because of the fear from
spreading the virus. Since students and teachers are the center of these change, finding how they
cope with this type of learning would really benefit future projects and endeavors of the school,
and they could adjust to the situation of the teachers and students accordingly. In the case of
teachers, being online tutors implies a quantitative increase in the number of hours dedicated to
learners and to the learning of new skills, but most importantly, a change in identity as there are
new roles and pedagogical perspectives that have to be taken into consideration (Comas-Quinn,
2011). Due to all these implications, it is clear that online learning and teaching challenge not
only the conventional roles of students, but also of those of teachers and materials. Also, the pre-
established conceptions and expectations about what, when and how to teach and learn are
greatly modified. As Hong and Samimy (2010), despite the popularity of BL, the important
question of whether teachers and students benefit from its intended efficacy has yet to be
answered. It must still be demonstrated that it meets the expectations of designers, teachers,
students, and institutions, and that it improves language acquisition as well as language
pedagogy.
This paper specifically wants to find out what are the coping mechanisms a student and
teacher does despite the challenge and difficulty of blended learning.
Conceptual Framework
Blended learning is the combination of three learning environments mainly limited face-
to-face learning, distance learning and the use of online learning, wherein they use different
types of media and method combinations that have addressed the needs of the different audience,
with different environments. In the past, these three environments have remained largely
separate because each involved three different types of medium strategies. For example, the
traditional face-to-face learning typically happened in teacher-directed environment with in-
person interaction in a live synchronous high-fidelity environment. On the other hand, distance
learning would make emphasis on self-paced learning and learning interaction that typically
occurs in asynchronous, low-fidelity (text only) environment. While online learning makes use
of internet connectivity and different online applications that make teachers and students
somewhat connected (Bonk C.J.,et al, 2005).
In a research conducted by Saleem T.A (2013), they ought to find out the hindrances and
obstacles, the criteria used in blended learning and be able to come up with a design or matrix
which would address the different hindrances bought about by this new type of learning. After
conducting it, they found out that the main obstacle in blended learning is financial status and
some human interventions as well. The matrix that they have come up with depended more or
focused more on the students’ cognitive and skillful domains rather than the affective ones.
According to Heilpon G., et al (2021), the engagement and learning of the student
depend also on the strategies of which teachers use on the students, how teachers encourage the
students in their lessons. In this research they conducted a test and see whether the teachers
approach the students and have appropriate strategies to motivate and encourage students to
continue still their lessons despite the situation brought about by the pandemic. This research
also found that keeping a consistent speed in both synchronous and asynchronous BL modes
boosted student behavioral and emotional involvement. Avoiding downtime and maintaining a
high level of involvement in synchronous sessions, as well as diversifying tasks over the
semester in the asynchronous BL mode, were concrete methods in this regard. Some
specifications were also emphasized, such as the tempo of synchronous online meetings, which
is typically faster than face-to-face meetings and in which professors must be very active in order
to stimulate student emotional engagement.
Vaugm’s (2014) study, which focused on online collaborative learning applications in
first-year BL courses, emphasized the use of a variety of digital tools to promote student
behavioral engagement in undergraduate Blended Learning courses, both synchronously and
asynchronously, implying that students would be unlikely to stay engaged otherwise.
In a larger study, Jeffrey et al. (2014) examined how teachers in traditional BL courses
for business undergraduates fostered student engagement, both face-to-face and asynchronously
online (n = 9). The findings revealed that student engagement was encouraged more in face-to-
face meetings than online, with few teachers having developed asynchronous online activities
(e.g., quizzes) to promote student engagement.
Because of the situation brought about to us by the Corona Virus, all schools and
institutions were forced to alter their previous way of teaching and opt for another way which is
the blended learning defined as the mixture of three different learning environments mainly,
limited face-to-face, online and distance learning. Each with different specifications and different
target audiences. The stated above related literature, shows how teachers and students both
adjusted to this new type of learning and how great effort must be put into this type of shift to be
able to call it a success in portraying and handing out information. But this new adjustment has
brought about new turmoil to both the teachers and the students and has greatly affected their
lives.
With the advancement of learning these days, a severe turmoil has hit students and
teachers in which they balance learning at home and resting at home. Chores at home also are
inevitable, parents also have an important role that parental involvement plays in children's
learning. Yet, it can be challenging for schools to establish appropriate relationships with
parents, Wanat, C.L. (2009).
The difference between this study and those aforementioned above is that this paper
tackles the different coping mechanisms that the students and teachers do to be able to keep up
with the demanding needs of this new type of learning environment. This research can also be a
basis for other schools to see whether the teachers and students are coping well with this new
type of learning.
A conceptual paradigm is illustrated in Figure 1.
Contextual Independent Dependent
factor Variables Variable
Difficulty on
Blended Senior high
blended
learning school
learning
students and
teachers in
Western
Tabuk District
Coping
mechanisms
Figure 1. Conceptual Paradigm of the relationships of the variables
The conceptual framework was based on the study of Mwakalonge,H. l. (2013), where
the figure shows the relationships of the different variables in the study. The independent
variables are the students and teachers who are the respondents of the paper and how they cope
with online distance learning. The conceptual factor of the framework, being the online distance
learning.
Statement of the Objectives and Hypotheses
This study aims to determine the coping mechanisms of selected teachers and students in
Tabuk Western District schools.
Specifically, this study aims to find out the following:
1. What are the profile of the Senior High School students and teachers in Western Tabuk
District:
a. Sex
b. Age
c. Grade Level
d. Years of Teaching
2. What are the coping mechanisms used by the students and teachers who are experiencing
difficulty on blended learning?
3. Is there any significant difference on their coping mechanisms when grouped according to
their profiles?
Definition of Terms
This section presents the operationally defined words used in this study to help readers
fully comprehend it.
Asynchronous sessions. This term is used in online learning where the teacher or
instructor would give tools and appropriate materials needed for the student to do, answer and
learn from it on their own time.
Blended Learning. A mixture of three different learning environments namely online
learning, limited face-to-face and distance learning.
Coping mechanisms. This word refers to the ways on which the students do to be able to
manage an external situation they are facing which is the new blended learning being used,
where they tolerate this experienced stress and also an effort to solve with these problems.
Distance Learning. This refers to the giving or distributing of modules and materials to
students to be taken from the school by parents and it would later be collected and checked by
teachers after a period of time.
Online Learning. This refers to a type of learning being used nowadays to avoid contact
with each other. This type of learning makes use of the online platform where students and
teachers meet and discuss online through different applications available.
Synchronous sessions. This term refers to a session making use of an online meeting tool
where there is a pre-specified date and time to meet.
Importance of the Study
CHAPTER II
DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
Research Design
The research is a qualitative-quantitative study or mixed method. The researcher also
identified the coping mechanisms that the teachers and students do, to be able to keep with
blended learning. Descriptive method was also used to some respondents since interview
questions would also be brought out and general observation which is to be done on site visit. In
the survey, the respondents have also been grouped according to gender, age, grade level and
years of teaching.
In the qualitative part of the research, listing has been done to be able to see the coping
mechanisms the respondents have been doing since this type of learning environment has been
used.
Locale and Population of the Study
The respondents of the research were Senior High school students and employed teachers
of the Tabuk Western District, school year 2021-2022. The profile of the students and teachers
have been included like their age, gender, year level, and years in teaching. Random sampling is
used to select randomly the respondents from the population. This is used to have an unbiased
random sampling which is important for drawing conclusions (Bennett et al,2020).
Questionnaires would be floated in the different Western Tabuk District schools either through
google forms for easier access or through paper questionnaires.
Data Gathering Instruments
Data gathering Procedure
Figure 2. Data Gathering Procedure
The researcher will then build the instrument that will be used, which will be adapted as a
result of the many investigations. After the survey has been approved and validated, the tool will
be in the form of google forms, and links or actual questionnaires will be sent to the respondents.
The researcher will reassure them that all of their responses or information will be used solely for
research purposes, and that their responses or information will not be used to personally
influence the respondents, and that all information will be kept confidential. The collected
responses were then assembled, transcribed, summarized, and analyzed, with a formula, various
statistical methods, and thematic analysis being used to determine the respondents' awareness of
fire preparedness. The results of the survey will be examined by the researchers when the time
limit has passed.
Treatment of Data
The data will be thoroughly vetted before the researcher will interpret and analyze it. The
researcher will also utilize statistical techniques such as weighted means, standard deviation, and
percentage to obtain desired results and assess the respondents' level of awareness. Thematic
analysis will also be utilized to assess obtained data that will be represented in tables.
Statistical Tools
REFERENCES
Aguilar, M. J. A. (2012, December 5). Blended learning and the language teacher: a literature
review. SciELO. Retrieved December 8, 2021, from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?
script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-46412012000200011
Bonk, C. J., Graham, C. R., Cross, J., & Moore, M. G. (2005). The Handbook of Blended
Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (1st ed.). Pfeiffer.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research in what language
teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
Comas-Quinn, A. (2011). Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: An
exploration of teachers' experiences in a blended learning course. ReCALL, 23(3), 218-
232.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacca in the Time of Covid-19 Crisis. Journal of
Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22.
http://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for
blended learning research. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham
(Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 13–33). Routledge.
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster
student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of
Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-
00260-3
Hong, K., & Samimy, K., (2010). The influence of L2 teachers' use of CALL modes on language
learners' reactions to blended learning. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 328-348.
Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: How teachers
balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information
Technology Education, 13, 121–140.
Kimotho, M. (2018). A Review of the Coping Strategies used by Male and Female Open and
Distance Learning Students. AR Jess Journal. http://arjess.org/education-research/a-
review-of-the -coping-strategies-used-by-male-and-female-open-and-distance-learning-
students.pdf
Mwakalogue., H.L.(2013). Figure 1 from Livestocked-based risk management and coping
Mechanism to drought among pastoralists: acase study of Handeri District, Tanga
Semantic Scholar. Semantic Scholar. http://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Livestock-
based-risk-management-and-coping-to-among-
Mwakalogue./a3c2dc341db5ed1178c7b9f9907e4f9fa26ad5d7/figure/0
Nelson, K. (2020). Exploring the Online Learning Selficacy of TeacherEducation Students at the
Laguna State Polytechnic University (8th ed., Vol.12). Universal Journal of Educational
Research.
http://d1wqtxts1xle7.cloudfront.net/65110134/UJER24_19520427-with-cover-page-
v2.pdf?
Expires=1632775005&signature=WAJstSEZXzR5gzo0GjV6ExGZTIdzAAzSzv89NT2Y
Saleem, T. A. (2013, November 9). Blended Learning Is the Natural Evolution of Electronic
Learning. Iiste.Org. Retrieved December 8, 2021, from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234634274.pdf
Song,L., Singleton, E.S., Hill, J. R.., & Koh, M.H. (2004). Improving Online Learning: Student
Perception of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher
Education, 7(1), 59-70. https://doi.org?10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003
Tayebinik,M., & Puteh, M. (2012). Blended learning or e-learning? IMACST, 3(1), 103- 110.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Blended+learning+or+e-
lear&author=Tayebinik+M&author=Puteh+M&publication_year=2012&journal=IMACS
T&volume=3&issue=1&pages=103-110
Wanat, C. L. (2009, November 30). ERIC - EJ891837 - Challenges Balancing Collaboration and
Independence in Home-School Relationships: Analysis of Parents’ Perceptions in One
District, School Community Journal, 2010. Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved
December 9, 2021, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ891837