Design and Development of Waste Compacto
Design and Development of Waste Compacto
1
Professor, Production Department, Defense University, Engineering College, Debrezeit,
Ethiopia
2
Professor, Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Department, Defense University,
Engineering College, Debrezeit, Ethiopia
3
Researcher, Center for Research and Development, Defense University, Engineering
College, Debrezeit, Ethiopia
ABSTRACT – A hydraulic waste compactor for compressing solid wastes such as paper,
PET bottles, tin and aluminum cans was designed and developed to alleviate the worsening
condition of waste management in Addis Ababa and the major cities in Ethiopia. The
compactor which compressed the waste into a final cubical form of 190 mm (L) x 190 mm
(W) x 160 mm (H), with a compression density of 1,500 kg/m3 includes three major
operations namely 1) compacting, 2) the lifting, and 3) unloading, all of which were driven
by cylinders and directional control valves.
Structural and material analyses were conducted for the whole structure to become robust.
Electro-pneumatic, electrical, and relay ladder logic diagram was designed to optimize the
whole operations of the compacting system. A Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)
Siemens LOGO was used to control the overall sequence and operations of the machine so
that it will become user friendly to the operator.
Keywords: compactor, PET, compression density, electro pneumatic, ladder diagram, PLC
1
Wastes are not segregated and were simply • Domestic Solid Waste .............. 0.2 – 0.8
scattered in open dump sites leading to kg/capita/day
environmental degradation and high risk • Commercial Solid Waste ….….. 0.1 – 0.2
exposure and dangers to peoples’ health. kg/capita/day
• Street Sweepings …….…….... 0.05 – 0.2
Design and development of low cost waste kg/capita/day
compactor usable by municipality, city, or • Institutional Solid Waste ........... 0.05 – 0.2
town or any organization can alleviate these kg/capita/day
problems.
Solid waste generation rate for some countries
OBJECTIVES are given below:
Domestic solid waste generation rates vary from Waste Generation Rates by Different Studies
0.2 kg/capita/day in developing countries to
about 1.6 kg/capita/day. Typical estimates of The reliable data on waste volume and weight
generated and collected in Addis Ababa is rather
urban solid waste generation in less developed
countries are as follows: limited. Quantity of waste generation units was
very much unclear until 1987 when a Nor
Consult, a private consultant company on waste
2
management from Norway, first published its households, 6% by street sweeping, 9% by
findings. Some other limited surveys have been commercial facilities, 5% by industries, 3% by
carried out by Lois Berger Company (by Gordon hotels and 1% by hospitals.
Stury in June 1994 and November 1995) and
French Mission in 1986. In different estimates, the share of compostables
has been assumed that 50% of the weight and
All of these indicate waste generation rates that 70% of the volume of the solid waste would be
are very low in international comparison. Waste compostable. The recyclable material (metals,
volume and weight generated varies from 0.40 to glass, plastics, paper, wood, rubber, etc.) is
1.23 liters/capita/day and from 0.11 to 0.25 estimated to be 15% of the weight and volume of
kg/capita/day. Waste density varies from 205 to the municipal solid waste.
370 kg/m3 in different surveys.
Physical Composition of Addis Ababa Solid
Generation Rates by different studies in Wastes
Addis Ababa
3
• Electrical wires, limit switches and
sensors, push buttons • Force developed by Ram:
Relevant Equations:
METHODOLOGY
σ= F
A⊥
→ F = σ(A ⊥ )
Study the existing waste handling practice in
the industry especially the compacting aspect d
or volume minimization.
d = 2r → r = 2
Material selection and characterization. For Ram: Circular cross–section
Design calculations for material and part 2 πd 2
dimension. A = πr = 4
Modeling of the system using software Conversions:
(CATIA, AutoCAD, or Solid Works). 1 bar = 100 KPa or KN/m2
Design review for tolerance analyses, 1 kg = 9.81 N
manufacturability, and assembly. 1 m = 1,000 mm
Selection of electric motor, tank, cylinder,
directional control valves, frame and rib Base on above equations:
thickness. • At 6 bars (600 KPa): F = 1,178 N or
Procurement of materials. 120 kg.
Fabrication of the machine. • At 8 bars (800 KPa): F = 1,571 N or
Reviewing with safety and health, standards. 160 kg.
Testing and debugging. • At max. 10 bars (1,000 KPa): F = 1,964
Document Preparation/final Terminal Report. N or 200 kg.
RECOMMENDATIONS
5
Appendix B – Assembly Drawings of Waste
Compactor