Scribd
Upload
109 views

Analytic Rubric Scoring Guide For Group Presentation

This document provides a scoring rubric for analyzing group presentations. It contains criteria for four areas: organization, content knowledge, delivery, and visual aids/teamwork. For each criterion, there are descriptions for excellent, good, fair, and poor performance and an associated point value from 1-4. The rubric will be used to evaluate a group's presentation and provide a total score.

Uploaded by

Ma. Cecilia Budiongan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
109 views

Analytic Rubric Scoring Guide For Group Presentation

This document provides a scoring rubric for analyzing group presentations. It contains criteria for four areas: organization, content knowledge, delivery, and visual aids/teamwork. For each criterion, there are descriptions for excellent, good, fair, and poor performance and an associated point value from 1-4. The rubric will be used to evaluate a group's presentation and provide a total score.

Uploaded by

Ma. Cecilia Budiongan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ANALYTIC RUBRIC SCORING GUIDE

Group Number/Leader : __________________________________ Topic Delivered : ________________


Date of Presentation : ___________________________

CRITERIA
4 3 2 1
Points
(Excellent) (Good) (Fair) (Poor)
Presentation was very Presentation was fairly Presentation was not clearly Presentation lacked
organized and was very easy to organized and pretty organized. Transitions between organization. Poor
follow. Transitions between followable. Transitions might members were transitions between group
Organization group members were well- be slightly discontinuous but jumpy/awkward. members individual parts. ______
planned and executed cleanly. did not take away greatly Presentation lacked order
from the overall presentation. and very difficult to follow.
Group members had a Most of the group members Group members had only a Group members had little
stronghold on the content and has a solid understanding of superficial understanding of to no understanding of the
Content Knowledge was thoroughly addressed. No the content. Content missing content. Several mistakes were content addressed in the ______
mistakes were made with minor elements or contained made during the presentation. presentation.
regards to content knowledge. minor errors.
Student used a clear, loud Student’s voice is clear. Student has unclear and weak Student mumbles,
voice, and correct, precise Student pronounces most voice. Audience members have mispronounces terms, and
Delivery pronunciation of terms. words correctly. difficulty hearing the speak too quietly for ______
presentation. students at the back of the
class to hear.
Visual aids used were utilized Visual aids used were Visual aids did not support Visual aids were not used
effectively throughout the somewhat effective but verbal presentation. They at all.
Visual Aid/s presentation. Group members weren’t used consistently lacked information, or group ______
used visual aids as a throughout presentation. members read solely from
supplement, not as a crutch. them.
The group worked very well The group worked well with Group communicated relatively Group did not work well
with each other, and the each other and well with a few lapses in the together. There were
Teamwork/ presentation was shared communicated well. Some presentation; some students obvious
equally among the group members participated slightly dominated the presentation miscommunications and ______
Participation
members. more than others. and others did not participate lapses in the presentation.
much.
Total ______

Comments/Feedbacks:

You might also like