0% found this document useful (0 votes)
729 views10 pages

NHAI-Policy Circular - Eff Cost

The document is a notice from the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways regarding a virtual session on value engineering practices for design, construction, and maintenance of national highway projects. It requests stakeholders to participate and provide suggestions. The session will be held on May 31st via a video conference link displayed on their website. Suggestions can also be emailed.

Uploaded by

kanagarajodisha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
729 views10 pages

NHAI-Policy Circular - Eff Cost

The document is a notice from the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways regarding a virtual session on value engineering practices for design, construction, and maintenance of national highway projects. It requests stakeholders to participate and provide suggestions. The session will be held on May 31st via a video conference link displayed on their website. Suggestions can also be emailed.

Uploaded by

kanagarajodisha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

NOTICE

Dated 26th May 2022

Sub: Request to participate in virtual session on “Value Engineering Practices to the


Design, Construction & Maintenance of National Highways Projects” hosted by MORT&H
on 31st of May, 3-5pm

Sir/Madam,
The Ministry of Road Transport & Highways is in the process of finalising guidelines on Value
Engineering Practices to the Design, Construction & Maintenance of National Highways
Projects. A draft circular along with its appendix is enclosed.
It is requested that all the stakeholders may participate and contribute his/her
valued and experienced suggestions to the profession. The VC link of the same will also be
displayed on the MORT&H website on 31st May 2022 well before the meeting. Also one can
compliment/supplement his/her suggestions with back up details & calculations to following
email:
[email protected]
Subject: - Value Engineering Practices to the Design & Construction of National Highways
Projects – reg

Madam/Sir,

Government of India has set an ambitious plan for development of National


Highways in the country. Many initiatives have been taken to materialise this
ambitious plan such as adopting worldwide best practices in engineering techniques
in design and construction of highways and bridges. Further, need is felt to adopt
value engineering practices in design, construction and maintenance with regards to
use of materials and technology as an important and vital step to meet the
sustainable development of the NH network throughout the country in a cost-
effective manner with improved durability & safety, de-carbonise & grow, reduction
in project execution timeline, increase in quality and reduction in maintenance.
2. The value engineering is very crucial for sustainable highway development. It
is a systematic method to achieve the targeted function of the highway at the lowest
whole life cost, without compromising on quality, performance, safety, and
aesthetics. Value Engineering practices aims at optimizing the value of the project
at various stages viz. project conception, project preparation, project bidding stage
and project implementation to achieve at least one of the following objectives:
a. Increasing the speed of construction
b. Reducing the cost of construction
c. Increasing asset durability
d. Improving aesthetics and safety
e. Promoting environmental sustainability
3. Value engineering can be applied at various stages in a project including
construction. However, the earlier it is applied, the higher are the returns. As per
World Bank report on Indian Road Construction Industry, it has been established that
the savings realized by undertaking value engineering exercises can be in the order
of 10-15% of the cost of the originally designed project.
4. The model of EPC or HAM or BOT project has the potential that the
Contractor or the Concessionaire would be able to adopt designs and construction
methodologies to suit the requirements of the project to bring down the cost while
not impacting other aspects such as functionality, quality or durability. Although a
facilitative provision for value engineering is laid out in the governing IRC Manuals
for highway projects (IRC SP 73/84/87), however contractors or concessionaires, out
of an apprehension that the authorities would take adverse views about any
alternative technologies, avoid any deviations from the specifications/technologies
sought for in the bid documents. There is no prevailing contractual facilitation for
value engineering in NH contracts which would compel the contractor and IE/ AE to
adopt value engineering. The possibility of alternative design schemes, use of new

Page 1 / 2
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF Tools AG\3-Heights(TM) Document Converter
Service\Temp\14b3cfda81b12896e4476d80157d36c2fb4c5eb1c52add3e08eadd0ffc99e7ae.docx
and marginal materials, technology, and waste materials entirely depends on
contractor’s/concessionaire’s choice and its approval by the IE/AE.
5. To add value engineering practices for design & construction of National
Highway, following has been decided:
5.1. Value Engineering shall be assigned as one of the task in the Terms of
Reference (ToR) for Feasibility Study and Detailed Engineering Projects. In Inception
Report itself there shall be a Chapter regarding Value Engineering, in which
Consultant shall include the potential & project specific value engineering aspects
identified by the respective domain experts based on site reconnaissance surveys.
In the Feasibility Report, Consultant shall examine the applicability, constructability
& appropriateness of the identified value engineering aspects and recommend the
cost-effective one. During design stage, design shall be done for the finally adopted
value engineering aspects and considering the same Schedules and Project Cost shall
be prepared. The typical value engineering concepts are given in Appendix-
1.However, in addition to the same other value engineering aspects shall also be
explored.
5.2. Annual Plan Preparation shall also keep in view the possible Value engineering
aspects.
5.3. During the Project appraisal, in PATSC/SFC memo, there shall be a para
regarding Value engineering Practices examined and finally adopted.
5.4. Further during implementation, the Contractors/Concessionaires should be
allowed to propose value engineered alternative design/innovative material/
technologies. AE/IE shall review the proposed value engineered design and if it is
not reviewed within the stipulated time, Contractors/Concessionaire shall submit it
to 3-member committee under the chairmanship of DG (RD&SS). In 3-member
committee, one member each from NHAI and NHIDCL shall be nominated. The 3-
member committee deliberate the proposal and recommend for its acceptance or
rejection. The distribution of savings in cost for the negative change of scope due
to reduction in length of highways/bridges/tunnels between Authority and
Contractor/Concessionaire may be 50:50.

Page 2 / 2
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF Tools AG\3-Heights(TM) Document Converter
Service\Temp\14b3cfda81b12896e4476d80157d36c2fb4c5eb1c52add3e08eadd0ffc99e7ae.docx
Appendix-1: Formulation of Value Engineering Strategy for National Highway Projects
The cost component of a highway project generally comprises of 70% of Material costs, 20%
of Machineries costs and 10.0% of Manpower costs. Hence, to have a value engineered
optimum highway emphasis shall be on material selection and design.
1. Policy for Design & Construction of Futuristic Flexible Pavement (FFP)
Flexible Pavement (New Construction) shall be designed for maximum allowed effective
subgrade design CBR 15.0% as per IRC: 37-2018. It can be achieved
1. using select soil (either borrow or excavated) of required CBR for subgrade and
embankment construction as per IRC:37 and MORT&H Specification,
2. improved subgrade upper layer(top 250mm) using select soil treated with hydrated
lime/cement/fly ash/pond ash/commercial cementitious stabilisers/liquid
additives/Nano technology/geo-synthetic(geo-textile/geo-grid/geo-cell) etc. as per
IRC:37, MORT&H Specification, IRC:SP:89(Part I & Part II) and IRC:SP:59-2019,
3. using mechanical modification of select soil blended with Pond Ash/non-plastic
soil/sand/gravel/mining waste/crushed aggregate/reclaimed granular material etc.
in subgrade layer construction as per IRC:SP:89(Part I)
For stabilization, purpose-built soil stabilizer shall be used. Use of indigenous
equipments/plants/machineries shall be encouraged.
Enhanced quality control more particularly the compliance of minimum specified
compaction, 4-days soaked CBR at specified density and design stabilizer content shall be
met in construction.
Benefits of Futuristic flexible Pavement (FFP)
i. Exploitation of maximum soil strength using technology (as we cannot minimize
earthwork quantity for a particular design road level)
ii. No need of any re-work in subgrade at the time of rehabilitation i.e. it is compatible
with future maintenance/augmentation etc. i.e. futuristic pavement
iii. Enhanced performance
iv. Reduction in designed pavement composition i.e. lesser thicknesses of
subbase/base/bituminous layer (reduction of DBM thickness in the range of 20-
50mm) i.e. a cost reduction in the range of 5-15.0 %
v. Less consumption of aggregates
vi. Less burning of bitumen i.e. lower emission of Green House Gases(GHG)
vii. Cost-effective, durable and environmentally sustainable.
2. Design Period for Bituminous Layer of Flexible Pavement
Currently, bituminous layer is being designed for 20 year design period. Bitumen is an
organic material, which oxidises with time. There is no perpetual bitumen. Experience
gained over the years confirmed that the maximum performance period of bituminous
wearing course is limited to 8-10 year. After that it requires renewal course. Nothing can
be designed beyond its performance period.
Further, to have at least 30-40% remaining life prior to overlay with renewal course, it is
prudent to design it for 15 years design period initially.
3. Rational Inputs for Rate Analysis

Page 1 / 7
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF Tools AG\3-Heights(TM) Document Converter
Service\Temp\35bcaadba0e282522e19be7ed55886bc438a9f634f03e790c01f997ed11fafb3.docx
Presently, inputs used for rate analysis is not closely simulated with the inputs taken by the
developer in actual construction. That is why, there is a bidding cost difference in the tune
of 20-30% lower side than that of Ministry. To have more closely simulation or rate analysis
at same platform, following strategy can be adopted.
i. The minimum rate of bitumen from the Government refinery and private producers
shall be taken.
ii. The minimum rate of Steel from the SAIL/TISCO and private manufacturers shall be
taken.
iii. The rate analysis of concrete shall be taken considering 20 per cent fly ash by weight
of total cementitious material.
4. Suggested Flexible Pavement layer Combination – All designs and estimations shall
necessarily be based on actual optimal requirements for layer thicknesses as per IRC: 37-
2018. Suggestive thicknesses as per catalogues (Ref. Section 12 of IRC: 37-2018) shall not be
used even for estimation purposes.

 For design traffic<=10msa


15.0% effective subgrade CBR+200mm CTSB+50mm BC with VG-40 or 150mm GSB+105mm
RAP+40mm BC with VG-40.

 For design traffic>10msa and <=50msa


The flexible pavement layer combination shall be 15.0% effective subgrade
CBR+CTSB+WMM+DBM/BC.

 For design traffic>50msa


The flexible pavement layer combination shall be 15.0% effective subgrade
CBR+GSB+CTB+AIL/SAMI+DBM/BC.
5. Use of Glass/Carbon/Aramid Fiber Reinforced Polymer Rebar for non-load bearing/
minor CD Structures
Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP’s) are a proven and successful alternative reinforcing that
will give structures a longer service life. To reduce the demand of conventional
reinforcement for highway projects, it is prudent to allow Glass/Carbon/Aramid Fiber
Reinforced Polymer Rebar for non-load bearing structures like Crash barrier, Drain and
minor CD structures i.e. Hume pipe Culvert and box Culvert. There is a reduction of 5-10%
of the cost.
As the IRC Guideline for the same is in the process of finalization, till then the design
standards & Specifications to be referred are
• AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Guide Specifications for GFRP-Reinforced Concrete
Bridge Decks and Traffic Railings, First Edition.
– Published in November 2009, this document offers authoritative design
guidance to the bridge design community in safely adopting FRP bars in bridge
decks and railings.
• CSA S-806 – Canadian Code
– “Design and Construction of Building Components with Fibre-Reinforced
Polymers”.
Page 2 / 7
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF Tools AG\3-Heights(TM) Document Converter
Service\Temp\35bcaadba0e282522e19be7ed55886bc438a9f634f03e790c01f997ed11fafb3.docx
• CSA S-6 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code
– Widespread adoption of GFRP bars in Canadian bridge structures is being
made possible by this important document.
• ACI 440.1R “Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete
Reinforced with FRP Bars”
– The American Concrete Institute 440 guide is a mature and living document
that as undergone a number of revisions since its first publication in 2001.
Companion documents to the 440.1R design guide include the ACI 440.3R
“Guide Test Methods for FRP’s for Reinforcing or Strengthening Concrete
Structures” which is intended as an interim document superseded by new
ASTM test methods as they become available.
International Studies
• FIB Task Group 9.3 – bulletin 40 “FRP Reinforcement in RC Structures”
– In Europe, the Federation Internationale du Beton FIB Task Group 9.3 has
published a technical report "Bulletin 40", which is a "state of the art" of
FRP reinforcement in RC structures. Work is under way on provisions for
FRP bars in Euro Code 2 format. Norway and Italy have published internal
design codes for the use of FRP bars.
• 4th Structural Specialty Conference of the Canadian Society for Civil engineering
Montréal. 2002
– Field application of FRP composite bars as reinforcement for bridges and
decks.
6. Use of Locally available marginal/ road building material/Industrial Waste/Municipal
Solid Waste landfill for Road construction
To reduce the GHG gases emission and cost of transportation, it is suggested during DPR
stage itself the locally available marginal road building material as well as industrial
waste/Slag/mines waste has to be evaluated. DPR must have the recommendations
regarding improvement measures to uplift locally available material/industrial/mines waste
to the premium road building material in the vicinity of the Project Road.
7. Type of Concrete Pavement
7.1 Bonded Concrete Pavement
Bonded Concrete pavement shall be designed as per IRC: 58-2015 for new construction. It is
similar to conventional concrete pavement except no polythene sheet in between DLC and
PQC. Generally the thickness of conventional concrete pavement is 280-300mm, whereas
with bonded concrete pavement it is 220-240mm. That is reduction of 20-25% PQC concrete
volume and initially construction cost itself is comparable to the conventional flexible
pavement.
7.2 Short-Panelled Concrete Pavement/Geo-cell filled Concrete Pavement
For new construction, even short-panelled concrete pavement may be considered. It is
similar to conventional concrete pavement with shorter panel sizes i.e. 1.0mX1.0m,
1.5mX1.5m and 1.75mX1.75m. The design thickness may generally vary from 180-220mm.
Page 3 / 7
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF Tools AG\3-Heights(TM) Document Converter
Service\Temp\35bcaadba0e282522e19be7ed55886bc438a9f634f03e790c01f997ed11fafb3.docx
Trial sections have been laid in some of the projects, such as Panagarh – Barwa Adda (NH-
2) and Baharagora – Kharagpur section of NH-33 and are being monitored; so far generally
the performance has been observed as satisfactory. IRC Guidelines for the same are under
development presently.
7.3 Pre-tensioned Pre-cast Concrete Pavement (PPCP)
For construction of new concrete pavement in urban/congested locations and panel
replacement of existing concrete pavement, pre-tensioned pre-cast concrete pavement
(PPCP) shall be adopted. The design thickness varies from 180-200mm.It shall be designed
using IRC: 58-2011 and computation of stresses should be done based on Finite Element
Modelling (FEM). Sections have been laid in some of the projects, such as Nagpur Inner Ring
Road, Nagpur Hingla Industrial Area, Amravati Pathan Chowk; so far generally the
performance has been observed as satisfactory. IRC Guidelines for the same are under
development presently.
7.4 White-Topping for Existing Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation
White-topping shall be also evaluated for rehabilitation of existing flexible pavement. Its
thickness varies from 150-180mm as per IRC: SP: 76-2015.
8. Use of Geo-composite alternative to Subbase layer
Generally the thickness of subbase being use varies from 150-200mm. An alternative to this
conventional subbase layer, it is better to use geo-composite. It is cost-effective and lesser
use of aggregate for road construction.
9. Use of Waterproofing Membrane alternative to Mastic over Bridge Deck
Generally the thickness of mastic being used varies from 25-40mm on bridge deck. An
alternative to this is 3-5mm thick water proofing membrane. It is cost-effective.
10. Utilisation/re-use of Reclaimed Road Material
10.1 Expansive Black Cotton Soil
Expansive black cotton soil is available in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Andra Pradesh,
Chhattisgarh, Gujarat and Karnataka. Generally this unsuitable soil is being removed and
replaced with suitable material to a minimum depth of 500mm. For the same, there is
always a problem of dumping site.
It is better to improve this unsuitable soil with fly ash/pond ash/hydrated lime/cement and
reuse it for earthwork. With the same, there is no requirement of suitable borrow earth as
well as savings in transportation cost and reduction in GHG emission.
Therefore, suitable decision may be taken to adopt appropriate methodology based on
relative scale of economy of alternate options.
10.2 Reuse of Excavated Soil
There must be accountability regarding reuse of excavated suitable soil.
10.3 Reuse of Reclaimed Existing Pavement Granular layer material
It is observed that there is a substantial generation of granular layer material while doing
up-gradation/capacity augmentation/rehabilitation/submerging due to proposed VUP/PUP.

Page 4 / 7
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF Tools AG\3-Heights(TM) Document Converter
Service\Temp\35bcaadba0e282522e19be7ed55886bc438a9f634f03e790c01f997ed11fafb3.docx
It is prudent to reclaim the same and use in subbase/base of proposed pavement. There
must be accountability regarding reuse of reclaimed existing pavement granular layer
material.
10.4 Reuse of Reclaimed Bituminous layer material (RAP) of existing flexible Pavement
It is observed that there is a substantial generation of existing bituminous layer material
while doing up-gradation/capacity augmentation/rehabilitation/submerging due to
proposed VUP/PUP/conversion of flexible to concrete pavement.
Generally it is observed that the existing bituminous layer material is dismantled and
dumped along national Highway in case of reconstruction/submerging due to proposed
VUP/Pup/change of pavement type to concrete pavement. It is merely a huge loss to the
nation due to wastage of costly RAP. There must be a RAP bank along the National Highway.
However, in rehabilitation of existing flexible pavement it is being reclaimed through milling
and being reused in DBM layer mix. The proportion of RAP is 20-30% with conventional Hot
Mix Plant (batch type) with RAP attachment. It can be further increased to 60-100% with
purpose-built Double barrel continuous hot mix plant.
The milled RAP is also being used as RAP layer by adding 25% virgin aggregate, 1.0% cement
and 2-3% foamed bitumen/emulsion. RAP is used as bituminous base course.
Even RAP can be used for DLC of Concrete Pavement.
It is prudent to reclaim the same and re-use 100% RAP generated. There must be
accountability regarding reuse of reclaimed RAP.
The guidelines to be referred are IRC: 37-2018 and IRC: 120-2015 except for % of RAP, which
may be increased.
11. SUPERPAVE Method of Bituminous Mix Design Method
The Marshall method of mix design has limitations of not closely simulating the actual
compaction carried out in the field. This limitation is addressed in SUPERPAVE method of
bituminous mix design; this technology is expected to be beneficial for heavy traffic
corridors in tandem with high ambient temperature. The technology simply requires a
SUPERPAVE Gyratory Compactor. With SUPERPAVE method, there would be estimated
reduction in design bitumen content to the tune of 0.2-0.3%, resulting into eventual savings.
The guideline to be referred is Asphalt Institute Manual Series SUPERPAVE SP-2.
12. Amendment in Minimum Bitumen content in MORT&H Specification
The minimum bitumen content specified in MORT&H specification for Bituminous Concrete
(BC) mix is 5.2% and 5.0% for grading 2 and 1 respectively. It appears to be on higher side
causing pre-mature bituminous layer rutting as reported in several NH projects like
Chitradurga-Hospet, Udaipur-Chittorgarh etc. It can be reduced to 4.9% and 4.7% for grading
2 and grading 1 respectively for cost estimate; no further negative tolerances for feeding
into Hot Mix Plant may be considered however.
Similarly, the minimum bitumen content for design air-void 4.0% specified in MORT&H
specification for Dense Graded Bituminous Mix (DBM) mix is of 4.5% and 4.0% for grading 2
and 1 respectively also appears to be on higher side and can be reduced to 4.3% and 3.8%
for grading 2 and grading 1 respectively for cost estimate; no further negative tolerances

Page 5 / 7
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF Tools AG\3-Heights(TM) Document Converter
Service\Temp\35bcaadba0e282522e19be7ed55886bc438a9f634f03e790c01f997ed11fafb3.docx
for feeding into Hot Mix Plant may be considered however. In case of design air-void 3.0%
or 3.5%, the bitumen content should be increased as per the design requirement.
13. Use of High Modulus Bituminous Mix for Perpetual Pavement (PP)
Perpetual Pavement is being constructed for entire 25 packages of Delhi-Vadodara
Expressways and other green-field expressways. The thickness of DBM with VG-40 bitumen
is 250mm.
Presently, IRC: 37-2018 does not allow modified bitumen in DBM layer due to recyclability
issue, however in PP there will not be recycle of DBM layer as only recycling/renewal of SMA
wearing course is envisaged. Therefore, it is better to have high modulus DBM layer for PP.
It will result into straightway 100mm reduction of DBM layer, and thus substantial savings
in initial construction cost of Perpetual Pavement.
14. Use of Fiber Reinforced Micro-surfacing for Renewal Course
Micro-surfacing is an eco-friendly treatment which is used to restore the surface
characteristics of the road. If the pavement is structurally adequate, Micro-surfacing is very
suitable to preserve the pavement from ageing, oxidation, aggregate loss and polishing
irrespective of the traffic (i.e. suitable for low, medium, and high traffic). Fibre-
reinforced Micro-surfacing is much superior to conventional Micro-surfacing. Presence of
glass fibre in Fibre-reinforced Micro-surfacing helps in enhancing the flexural strength of
the Micro-surfacing and thereby drastically reduces the chances of reflective cracking.
There are no specifications in India for Fiber-reinforced Micro-surfacing, hence Downers
Report to be reffered. Generally the doses of fiber is 0.2% by dry weight of aggregate. The
guideline for conventional micro-surfacing to be referred is IRC: SP: 81.
For wearing course renewal, fiber reinforced micro-surfacing of 8-10mnm thickness shall be
adopted.
15. Use of Micro-Bituminous Concrete (MBC) for Improvement in Riding Quality (IRQP)
Works
A 15-20mm thick micro-bituminous concrete with 7.5mm nominal maximum size aggregate
shall be adopted for IRQP works. It is similar to conventional BC Mix Design parameters and
requirements except the grading shall be as per mix designation DG7 of Newzeland Transport
Agency NZTA M10-2014.
16. Use of Integral Super-Structures in Major Structures
Integral structure deck super-structure, which gives continuity shall be used. Due to deck
continuity, there will be reduction in deck depth, lesser number of bearings & expansion
joints and hence lesser maintenance and improved rideability.
17. Use of High Damping Rubber bearing for Structures
High Damping Rubber (HDR) bearing may be used. It will also act as seismic isolators during
earthquake and cost-effective. Design codes and testing procedures for such bearings are
already available in some countries, as also, in CEN (2005) “Eurocode 8: Design of Structures
for Earthquake Resistance – Part 2: Bridges”, pr EN 1998-2 (Final Draft), Comité Européen
de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium.
18. Use of Pre-cast Structures

Page 6 / 7
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF Tools AG\3-Heights(TM) Document Converter
Service\Temp\35bcaadba0e282522e19be7ed55886bc438a9f634f03e790c01f997ed11fafb3.docx
Use of pre-cast for VUP/LVUP/PUP/Box Culvert shall be promoted. It will result into time
savings.
19. Waste to Wealth
Pond Ash is the proven material for embankment/subgrade layer construction. Its
availability shall be ensured for the construction of highways.
20. Use of Geo-cell for Slope Protection Measures
Geo-cell filled with locally available marginal material shall be an alternative to the
conventional stone pitching used for slope protection measures. The guideline to be referred
is IRC: 56-2011”Recommended Practices for Treatment of Embankment and Roadside Slopes
for Erosion Control (First Revision)”.
21. Use of Geo-Composite for Filter Material behind RE Wall/Retaining wall/Abutments
Geo-composite shall be used as an alternative to conventional aggregate filter material in
0.6m width behind RE wall/Retaining Wall/Abutments of structures. It will be cost-effective
as well as substitute of virgin aggregate. The guideline to be referred is IRC: SP: 59-2019”
Guidelines for Use of Geosynthetics in Road Pavements and Associated Works (First Revision)
and section 3100 of MoRT&H Specification”.
22. Use of Soil Stabilised Earthen Shoulder
Presently in upper 150mm of earthen shoulder crushed aggregate is being used. As a cost-
effective alternative soil treated with 3-4% cement shall be used. It will also not require
virgin aggregate. The guideline to be referred is Kenyan Pavement design Manual.
23. Use of Construction & Demolition(C&D) Waste
A C&D bank shall be along the National Highway and the material shall be used as an
alternative to sand/fine aggregate for concrete. For this crushing of C&D material will be
required. The guideline to be referred is IRC: 121- 2017 “Guidelines for Use of Construction
and Demolition Waste in Road Sector”.
24. 100% Recycling of Reclaimed Bituminous Layer Material
India has presently about 1.41 lakh km length of National Highways Network. Progress of
about 37 km per day was achieved for development works on NHs during 2021-22. However,
the quantum of the aged asset is increasing, which warrant rehabilitation to extend its life
further. Therefore, emphasis is also required to be given for taking up
rehabilitation/strengthening works on NHs. Therefore to have cost-effective and sustainable
rehabilitation/strengthening, It is prudent to reclaim the bituminous layer material and
reuse it 100% by adding innovative rejuvenating agents to get reclaimed bitumen properties
at par with fresh bitumen.
With afore-mentioned value engineering practices (as discussed from sl. no. 01 to
24), there may be a reduction of initial project cost in the tune of 20-30 %. Besides this,
there is a time savings, less consumption of road building materials and less emission of GHG
without compromising performance durability of the National Highways Asset.

Page 7 / 7
C:\Program Files (x86)\PDF Tools AG\3-Heights(TM) Document Converter
Service\Temp\35bcaadba0e282522e19be7ed55886bc438a9f634f03e790c01f997ed11fafb3.docx

You might also like