B.F. Skinner's scientific behaviorism focused on observable behaviors and their environmental causes rather than internal states. It examines behaviors using classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and reinforcement schedules. Observational learning also influences behaviors as people model those they observe. Albert Bandura expanded on these concepts through social cognitive theory, including triadic reciprocal causation among personal factors, behaviors, and environmental influences. Self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulation strategies further explain how cognitive and social factors shape behaviors.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views6 pages
Skinner Bandura Notes
B.F. Skinner's scientific behaviorism focused on observable behaviors and their environmental causes rather than internal states. It examines behaviors using classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and reinforcement schedules. Observational learning also influences behaviors as people model those they observe. Albert Bandura expanded on these concepts through social cognitive theory, including triadic reciprocal causation among personal factors, behaviors, and environmental influences. Self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulation strategies further explain how cognitive and social factors shape behaviors.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6
1 B.F.
SKinner and behavioural Analysis
2 Scientific Behaviourism Internal states SHOULD NOT be used to explain behaviour Emphasis on physical experiences/situations vs. inner motivations Study focuses on determining conditions under which behaviour occurs Emphasis on empirical observation, order, and reliable relationships 3 COnditioning 4 Classical Conditioning Discrimination - conditioned response does not occur if the stimulus is different Generalisation - conditioned response occurs if the stimulus is similar 5 Operant Conditioning Operant Discrimination - reinforcement history results in differences in responses among people Stimulus Generalisation - people may response similarly to different stimuli 6 SHAPING Reinforcement occurs at successive approximations Gross approximations first Then closer approximations Then the desired behaviour 7 Reinforcement Strengthens the behaviour AND rewards the person Reinforcement =/= Reward Positive Reinforcement - adding stimulus that will increase behaviour Negative Reinforcement - taking away stimulus that is aversive 8 Punishment DECREASES behaviour by suppression, conditioning negative feelings, spreading effects of negative feelings Less predictable results than reinforcement Positive Punishment - adding an aversive stimuli Negative Punishment - removing a positive reinforcer Negative Punishment - removing a positive reinforcer 9 Reinforcement vs. Punishment Expression of E, N, and P depend on each other. Ex. How would a person who is average E and high N express anger? Compared to a person who is high E? How would a person who is low P and high N express anger? Compared to a person who is high P? 10 Types of Reinforcers Primary Reinforcer - food, water, sex, physical comfort Conditioned Reinforcers - not satisfying by nature BUT associated with primary reinforcers Generalised Reinforcers - associated with more than one primary reinforcer Ex. attention, approval, affection, tokens 11 Schedules of Reinforcement Continuous vs. Intermittent Ratio (number of responses) vs. Interval (time) Fixed (set number/time) vs. Variable (average number/time) Start at continuous to more intermittent Intermittent schedules —> more resistant to extinction 12 Extinction An acquired response can be weakened through non-reinforcement Operant Extinction - weakening a learned response 13 HUman Behaviour 14 Forces that shape the species Natural Selection - behaviours that benefit the species tend to survive Cultural Evolution - cultural practices get transmitted through those who survive Not all cultural practices are adaptive 15 Inner states Drives - effects of deprivation and satiation 15 Inner states Drives - effects of deprivation and satiation Emotion - contingencies of survival and physical reinforcements Self-awareness - observations of private events 16 Complex behaviour Creativity - random or accidental behaviours that happen to be rewarded Unconscious Behaviour - suppressed, ignored, denied behaviour 17 SOCIAL Control of behaviour Operant Conditioning Describing contingencies/consequences Deprivation and satiation Physical Restraint 18 Self-Control Physical restraint Physical aids Changing environmental stimuli Escape from environmental stimuli Substitute behaviours 19 activity 20 ALBERT BANDURA and SOcial Cognitive Theory 21 Learning 22 Observational Learning Modeling MORE than imitation Adds and subtracts from observed behaviour 23 Observational Learning Modeling 23 Observational Learning Modeling People are most likely to model high-status people People who lack skill or status are most likely to model People model behaviour that is seen as rewarding to the model 24 Observational Learning Four processes: Attention - noticing what the model does Representation - symbolically representing patterns in memory Behaviour production - producing the behaviour Motivation - there must be something that motivates to perform 25 Enactive Learning All behaviour is followed by some consequence: Consequences inform us of effects - for future actions Consequences motivate anticipatory behaviour - foresight Consequences of responses reinforce behaviour 26 Enactive Learning Cognitive evaluation of the situation and the consequences affects learning in direct experiences More fully explains complex behaviour 27 Triadic Reciprocal Causation 28 The Triad Fundamental situational error - environment only Fundamental attribution error - internal dispositions only Evolved Mechanisms: exist in response to and with input from the environment. The environment cannot affect behaviour if there are no mechanisms to respond. Epigenetics - change in gene function, without change in DNA 29 Environmental events Chance Encounters Fortuitous Events Chance Encounters Fortuitous Events 30 Personal Factors Human Agency - ability to organize, regulate, and enact behaviors that can bring about desired consequences Intentionality - proactive commitment to actions Foresight - ability to set goals Self-reactiveness - monitoring progress, adjusting Self-reflectiveness - thinking about, evaluating motives, values 31 Personal Factors Self-Efficacy - beliefs that one can or cannot exercise behaviours necessary to bring about desired consequences NOT outcome expectations 32 SElf-Efficacy Self-Efficacy - acquired, enhanced, or decreased by: Master experiences - performance Social Modeling - observing someone of equal ability succeed or fail Social Persuasion - encouraging words Physical or emotional states - anxiety, fear 33 Self-Efficacy Proxy Agency - people seek proxies to exercise partial control Collective Efficacy - confidence in combined efforts to produce social change Can be lowered through helplessness, complex technology, bureaucracies, world-wide problems 34 Self-regulation Manipulating the environment to produce consequences, to help regulate own behaviour External factors Internal factors Moral Agency 35 Self-regulation Moral Agency 35 Self-regulation External factors Standards of evaluation - direct learning or observations External Reinforcement - incentives 36 Self-regulation Internal factors Self-observation - what we attend to, what we ignore Judging or Evaluating - personal standards, standards of reference, value, performance attribution Self-reaction - self-reinforcement or self-punishment 37 Self-regulation Moral Agency - internalised self-sanctions, prevents violating internal moral standards Selective Activation - regulation is not automatic, but operates if activated, depends on a persons evaluation of the situation Disengagement of internal control - ability to separate self from the negative consequences of behaviour 38 Self-Regulation People separate their conduct from the negative consequences by: Redefining behaviour - justifying through cognitive restructuring Displacing or diffusing responsibility Dehumanizing or blaming the victims Distorting relationships between behaviour and consequences 39 activity