0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views10 pages

8D CT Interchnaged - NNL

1. The document details an issue where the CT feedback cables were interchanged for input and output on a 30kva Falcon 8500 system installed at Newlord Nigeria. 2. The root cause was determined to be the excess length of the output CT cable. 3. Corrective actions included verifying and optimizing excess CT cable lengths, manually filling load charts, and adding layout verification to the manufacturing process.

Uploaded by

Abhinav Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views10 pages

8D CT Interchnaged - NNL

1. The document details an issue where the CT feedback cables were interchanged for input and output on a 30kva Falcon 8500 system installed at Newlord Nigeria. 2. The root cause was determined to be the excess length of the output CT cable. 3. Corrective actions included verifying and optimizing excess CT cable lengths, manually filling load charts, and adding layout verification to the manufacturing process.

Uploaded by

Abhinav Singh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Doc No.

8D Report Rev. No.

Name of the Customer : New Lord Nigeria. Commissioning Date :

Product Model : Falcon 8500 Date of Issue Occurred:

Rating : 30kva Date of Issue Closed:

Product Sr. No : P1201912103935 Initiated By :

CRM No. : Department:

Cross function team members


Team Members

Name Department Email Contact No.


Mr.Mukund Hajare Quality
Mr.Amol Gaikwad Testing
1 Mr.Suraj Pratap Singh Quality

Mr. Nilesh Ghule Harness- Production

Mr.Atul Gawande Production

Mr.Mukund Gavate Testing


Description (Describe issue in terms of what, where, when and how many)
Problem Description

2
What : CT f/b cables interchanged for Input & output. 

Problem Description
Where : Newlord Nigeria

When: During Installation

2 Who: Service Engg.

How Many: 1

What actions were taken to immediately protect the customer.


Responsible /Target
Interim Containment

Mr.Swapnil G
On Site Service engg changed the CT connection as per WD.

3
Actions taken on suspected inventory.Sorting Results (Time, Date, Total Number Sorted and Quantity Rejected)

We cheked all unit of Falcon 8500- 30 & 40kva system on shop floor & dispatched system (advance setting file) after complaint recive

Sorted Qty : Defect Qty :


15 0 -
ROOT CAUSE

Why Made Why missed


Why 1: CT f/b cables interchanged for Input & output.  Why 1: CT f/b cables interchanged for Inp

Why 2: Wrong placement of CT conncetion cable. Why 2: Testing engg not verified the load

Why 3: O/P Ct cable length is excess. Why 3: For load we used SNAP of Powe

Why 4: Why 4:

Why 5: Why 5:

Root Cause Obtained from Why Why Analysis Root Cause Obtained from Why Why Ana
: Due to excess length of O/P CT cable. Snap shot of load test on power analy
attched to the report without verificatio
4
Root Cause

Fish Bone
Man Method Material Measurement

Root Cause Obtained from Fish Bone:


ROOT CAUSE :

Permanent Corrective
Corrective Action
Corrective Action Responsible /Target

Action

5 1) Verified output CT layout and optimise the excess length. Change circulate through
ECN. 1) Nilesh G. 30-06-20
2) Load chart will fillup manually in test report. 2) Amol G. 23-06-20

Verification of Corrective Action


Verification

6 For load chart fillup manually is started from 23rd june and same is verified

Preventive action :
Preventive Action Responsible /Target
Prevention

7
1) Layout verification check point add in new harness mfg. Process by CFT. 1) Nilesh G. 30-06-20
2) a)Check I/p & O/p current on display when system is working on batteries by both 2) a)Amol G & Suraj S. 23-06-
Prevention team(testing & OQA) & b) same value of o/p current mentioned on test report by testing 20
Engg. b) Mukund G. 27-06-20

7 Affected Document Owner for Update Completion status


Workmanship Std.
Work Instructions / SOP Nilesh G Open
Has the necessary documentation QAP / ML Mukund G Open
been updated?
Process Flow
Drawing Nilesh G Open
Aspect Impact / HIRA
Risk Assessment Register Nilesh G. & Amol G Open
Closure Statement (Validation)
Closure

8 Containtment actions are already taken at site and system made operational and same is working in normal condition , corrective actio
closed as per Target date mentioned above.
QA.FQ.FO03
0

5/14/2020

5/14/2020

6/25/2020

Mr.Amol Kulkarni
Service

Contact No.
Status

Closed.

ter complaint recived.


interchanged for Input & output.

not verified the load test report.

used SNAP of Power Analysier.

d from Why Why Analysis:


est on power analysier taken & same is
t without verification of parameter.

Environment
Status

1) Open
2) Closed

Status
1) Open
2) a)Closed
b) Open

Date

6/30/2020
6/27/2020

6/30/2020

6/30/2020

tion , corrective actions will be taken and

You might also like