Module 5 - ES - Population Principle and Demography
Module 5 - ES - Population Principle and Demography
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
GEED 20103
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
= 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
The maximum population growth rate for a species, also referred to as biotic
potential, is express in:
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
= 𝑟𝑟𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑁𝑁
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
The second group of limiting factors consists of density-independent limiting factors that affect per
capita growth rate independent of how dense the population is.
As an example, let's consider a wildfire that breaks out in a forest where deer live. The fire will kill any
unlucky deer that are present, regardless of population size. An individual deer's chance of dying doesn't
depend at all on how many other deer are around. Density-independent limiting factors often take the
form of natural disasters, severe weather, and pollution.
The most important determinant of the rate at which human populations grow is related to
how many women in the population are having children and the number of children each
woman will have. The total fertility rate of a population is the number of children born per
woman in her lifetime.
A total fertility rate of 2.1 is known as replacement fertility, since parents produce 2 children
who will replace the parents when they die. Eventually, if the total fertility rate is maintained
at 2.1, population growth will stabilize.
A rate of 2.1 is used rather than 2.0 because some children do not live very long after birth
and therefore will not contribute to the population for very long. When a population is not
growing, and the number of births equals the number of deaths, it is said to exhibit zero
population growth.
The main unknown factor in any population growth scenario is Earth’s carrying capacity. Most published
estimates of how many people Earth can support range from 4 billion to 16 billion. For example, in 2004,
environmental economists in the Netherlands performed a detailed analysis of 69 recent studies of Earth’s
carrying capacity for humans. Based on current technology, they estimated that 7.7 billion is the upper
limit of human population that the world can support. Even the low U.N. projection for 2050 exceeds this
value.
These estimates vary widely depending on what assumptions are made about standard of living, resource
consumption, technological innovations, and waste generation. If we want all people to have a high level
of material well-being equivalent to the lifestyles in highly developed countries, then Earth will support far
fewer humans than if everyone lives just above the subsistence level. Unlike with other organisms,
environmental constraints aren’t the exclusive determinant of Earth’s carrying capacity for humans.
Human choices and values must be factored into the assessment.
These population researchers contend that a massive wave of human suffering and
death will occur. This view doesn’t mean we will go extinct as a species, but it projects
severe hardship for many people. Some experts think the human population has
already exceeded the carrying capacity of the environment, a potentially dangerous
situation that threatens our long-term survival as a species.
- As a species, we humans have expanded our range throughout Earth, and few habitable
areas remain that have the resources to adequately support a major increase in human
population.
- It is unlikely that death rates will increase substantially in the foreseeable future.
Consequently, global human population will not stabilize unless birth rates drop.
- Cultural traditions, women’s social and economic status, family planning, and government
policies all influence total fertility rate (TFR).
Gender inequality exists to varying degrees in most societies: Women don’t have the same rights,
opportunities, or privileges as men. Gender disparities include the lower political, social, economic, and
health status of women compared to men. For example, more women than men live in poverty, particularly
in developing countries. In most countries, women are not guaranteed equality in legal rights, education,
employment and earnings, or political participation. Because sons are more highly valued than daughters,
girls are often kept at home to work rather than being sent to school.
In most developing countries, a higher percentage of women are illiterate than men. However, definite
progress has been made in recent years in increasing literacy in both women and men and in narrowing
the gender gap. Fewer young women and men are illiterate than older women and men within a given
country. Worldwide, some 90 million girls aren’t given the opportunity to receive a primary (elementary
school) education. Laws, customs, and lack of education often limit women to low-skilled, low-paying jobs.
In such societies, marriage is usually the only way for a woman to achieve social influence and economic
security.