Three Story Condominium Building: Engr. Najeb B. Pendiaman
Three Story Condominium Building: Engr. Najeb B. Pendiaman
CONDOMINIUM
BUILDING
A Requirement Presented to
Engr. Najeb B. Pendiaman
Faculty of Department of Civil Engineering
College of Engineering
Mindanao State University – Marawi City
Submitted by:
Ruben S. Casinillo, Jr.
Joshua Rodrigo C. Ablin
May 27, 2022
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title Page
Condominium Design Standard 1
Architectural Plan 3
Schedules 9
Load Calculations 11
Assumed Slab Thickness, Beam Size, and Column Size 17
Wind Load 20
Earthquake Load 31
Slab Design 39
Spacing Reinforcement Bar 45
Design Footing 47
ETabs Parameters 50
Condominium Design Standards
The following standards shall apply to all condominium projects citywide, including specific plan
areas, which are approved after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this section. This section
provides minimum design and development standards for condominiums which are subject to approval of
a development plan permit in compliance with Chapter 17.42 and which shall be constructed in the
following manner:
A. Density. The maximum density of the underlying zoning district may be allowed only with
demonstration that the project meets or exceeds city standards and that superior design elements are
utilized.
B. Building Setbacks.
1. Structures shall be located on the project property to meet the requirements of the zoning district
for setbacks and distances between buildings except as provided herein. Setback requirements shall be
measured from the subdivision boundaries, common area boundaries and curb face of private streets
whichever is nearest as applicable. Where condominium structures are not located along a street, and are
located behind other structures, or where there are structures back to back, there shall be a minimum fifty-
foot separation between buildings and there shall be an unobstructed, minimum twenty-four foot wide
separation distance between buildings along the street, where it would be necessary to bring a fire truck to
a location within one-hundred sixty-five feet of any portion of the exterior walls of any condominium
structure.
2. In calculating the additional setbacks required for building heights above twenty feet, where
there is no property line from which to measure setbacks, the required separation distances between
buildings shall be increased pursuant to Section 17.20.100.
C. Site Design.
1. There should be an efficient and harmonious grouping of structures and space which encourages
the individuality of separate condominium dwelling units within a unifying design concept.
2. The applicant shall utilize site planning techniques and architectural treatments to reduce the
impact of building mass. Use of varied building heights, building articulation, landscaping, walls and
fences, screening and other similar techniques may be employed to achieve the goal of reduction of
building mass impacts.
3. All condominium lots shall be situated in such a way that noise impacts will be mitigated.
Dwellings shall be sound attenuated against present and projected noise to mitigate noise impacts on
outdoor living areas and in all habitable rooms.
4. Buildings shall be placed in a manner to allow streetscape building diversity. Clusters of
condominiums shall be sited in a manner that respects the natural topography and that avoids excessive
massing. Front setbacks of structures shall be varied by increasing some setbacks to the extent necessary
to create an interesting appearance from the street.
5. Private drives serving the clusters of single-family homes shall be curvilinear, either following
the natural contours, or in the event of a flat site, to avoid long straight-aways.
6. Condominium structures shall be offset to avoid linear arrangement of homes between clusters
and across streets.
7. The project shall establish safe, direct and convenient access to common amenity areas.
1
8. Private driveways serving four or less dwelling units having no parking within the travelway shall
have a minimum paved width of twenty-four feet.
D. Structure Design.
1. Building design shall integrate and equitably distribute details on sides of proposed structures
which face private streets, common areas and public rights-of-way as follows:
a. Light and shadow achieved through openings, projections, recesses and details;
b. Avoidance of large blank façades;
c. Roof lines shall vary by use of varying roof structural configurations and slopes.
2. Rear building elevations shall incorporate design features consistent with front building
elevations.
E. Landscaping.
1. Hierarchy of the circulation system shall be reinforced by landscaping. Project plans shall
identify opportunities and techniques for the creation of focal points where appropriate. Such
opportunities may include, but shall not be limited to, use of attractive hardscape elements, specimen
trees, water features or unusual plant groupings.
2. The use of special landscape treatments and/or thematic elements shall be used to embellish
distinguishable features of the condominium project.
3. The applicant shall enhance entry view corridors. Design treatments which enhance project
entries through the use of raised medians, additional landscaping, landscape theme and location of
recreational amenities may be required.
4. It shall be demonstrated that trees will be distributed on slopes, common areas and/or lots and
along private streets so as to interrupt and soften the silhouette of structures visible from outside the
project.
5. The natural vegetation and topography should be preserved where such natural features
contribute to the attractiveness of the project and compatibility within the neighborhood or district.
F. Compatibility with Surrounding Development.
1. The applicant shall design the project to create project edges which are compatible with adjacent
residential communities, which have been previously approved by the city. Similar structure heights,
comparable or more attractive perimeter walls, architectural features and landscaping improvements shall
be designed.
2. The design of the condominium structures and overall site plan should be compatible with the
physical characteristics of the site, with buildings adjacent to the site, and with the character of the
neighborhood or district. Design compatibility of buildings includes harmonious building style, form,
size, color, materials and relationship to site topography. A compatible design plan is one which preserves
the existing neighborhood character, facilitates efficient and convenient circulation, is functionally related
to the natural topography, utilizes natural characteristics of the site, and is an asset to the community.
3. Due consideration should be given to the impact of condominium development on the
neighborhood or district in which property is located. Development should be designed to minimize view
obstruction.
2
Architectural Plan
I. Perspective View
II.
3
III. 2nd and 3rd Floor Plan
4
V. Front and Back Elevation
5
VI. Left and Right Elevation
6
VIII. 2nd and 3rd Floor Framing Plan
7
XII. Vicinity Map
8
Schedules
I. Schedule of Beam
9
III. Schedule of Slab
10
Load Calculation
Dead Load
For the purpose of this design, NSCP 2015 Table 204-1 and 204-2 for the Minimum Design
Dead Load (KPa) is used.
11
12
Dead Load Parameters
From Table 204-1 Minimum Densities for Loads from Materials
o Concrete Self Weight 23.6 kN/m3
From Table 204-2 Minimum Design Dead Load
o Ceiling
Gypsum board (0.5 in) 0.010 kPa
Mechanical Duct Allowance 0.200 kPa
Plaster on Tiles or Concrete 0.240 kPa
Covering (Roof and Wall)
o Cement Tile 0.770 kPa
o Waterproofing Membranes
Bituminous, Smooth Surface 0.070 kPa
Liquid, applied 0.050 kPa
Floor and Floor Finishes
o Ceramic or quarry tile (20 mm) 0.770 kPa
o Concrete Fill Finish (20 mm) 0.460 kPa
Frame Walls
o Windows, glass, frames and sash 0.380 kPa
Member Loads
o Exterior Walls (150 CHB) 3.11 kN/m per meter height
o Interior Wall (100mm CHB) 2.98 kN/m per meter height
Elevator (Neglect for now)
Slab Weight (100 mm height) 2.36 kN/m2
13
Live Load
For the purpose of this design, NSCP 2015 Table 205-1 for Minimum Uniform and
Concentrated Live Loads and Table 205-2 for Special Loads is used
14
15
Live Load Parameters
Under Table 205-1 Minimum Uniform and Concentrative Live Loads (kPa)
Residential Areas
o Basic floor area 1.900 kPa
o Exterior balcony 2.900 kPa
o Storage 1.900 kPa
Rest Room 1.900 kPa
Roof deck
o Same as area served or occupancy 1.900 kPa.
Stairs
o Exit Facilities 4.800 kPa
16
Assumed Slab Thickness, Beam Size, and Column Size
Assumed Slab Thickness
Since all the long-to-short span ratio (L/b) of the slabs are less than 2, then all the slabs
are considered a two-way slab.
17
Design of Beams and Columns
Beam Reinforcement Design
Longitudinal Reinforcement
No. of Rebar to be Use =
Area∨Rebar
Sample Solution
Longitudinal Reinforcement (TOP) = 542 mm2 (Base on Etabs)
Longitudinal Reinforcement (BOTTOM) = 425 mm2 (Base on Etabs)
Area of Rebar (16) = 201.1 mm2
542
No. of Rebar to be Use = = 2.70 = 3 rebars at top
201.1
425
= = 2.11 = 3 rebars at bottom
201.1
2∗π∗10 2
Area of Shear Reinforcement = = 157.08 mm2
4
1000 x Area of Shear Reinforcement
Spacing Required = =
Shear Reinforcing
1000 X 157.08
839.48
18
Spacing Required = 187.12 mm
Spacing to be Use = 150 mm
19
Tie Spacing = 250 mm
Wind Load
To compute the wind load of the structure, steps provided in Table 207B.2-1 MWFRS
Wind Load for Enclosed, Partially Enclosed and Open Building of All Heights is used.
20
Nature of Occupancy
For the purpose of design, each structure shall be placed in one of the occupancy
categories listed in Table 103-1 of the National Structural Code of the Philippines. Based on the
function of the building, the structure falls under Occupancy Category IV: Standard Occupancy
Structure.
21
Wind Load
Basic Wind Load
Following map will be used to identify the basic wind speed for a building under standard
occupancy structure. Cabadbaran City is in the contour line of 310 kph wind basic velocity.
22
Wind Load Parameter
Wind Direction Factor (Kd)
The following table shows that the building structure has a wind directionality factor, Kd
of 0.85.
Exposure Factor
The structure falls under the category of Exposure B.
23
Topographic Factor (Kzt)
For simplicity of the design, kzt = 1.0 will be used.
24
Enclosure Classification
The structure is considered as an enclosed building as per defined in the NSCP 2015.
25
Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficient, KZ or Kh
The following table will be used to determine the velocity pressure exposure coefficient,
Kz or Kh of every elevation.
Exposure B
o Elevation, z = 11,900 mm Kz = 0.7580
o Elevation, z = 7,200 mm Kz = 0.6520
o Elevation, z = 4,000 mm Kz = 0.5700
26
Velocity Pressure (qz or qh)
The Equation 207B.3-1 will be used to determine the velocity exposure of every
elevation.
For Exposure B
Elevation, z = 11.9 m (level 3) qz = 2.929 kN/m2
Elevation, z = 7.2 m (level 2) qz = 2.519 kN/m2
Elevation, z = 4.0m (level 1) qz = 2.202 kN/m2
Since the structure is designed with roof deck, the following table shows external
pressure coefficient, Cp of walls.
27
The plan shown below is the structure’s horizontal dimension where the wind direction is
parallel to the transverse frame.
Value of L/B:
28
Calculated Total Wind Pressure, p (Windward + Leeward)
The total wind pressure on each building surface of the structure is calculated based on
Equation 207B.4-1.
29
Wind Parallel to Traverse Frame
o Elevation, z = 11.90 m (level 3) 2.10 kPa
o Elevation, z = 7.200 m (level 2) 1.95 kPa
o Elevation, z = 4.000 m (level 1) 1.86 kPa
Wind Parallel to Longitudinal Frame
o Elevation, z = 11.90m (level 3) 1.78 kPa
o Elevation, z = 7.200m (level 2) 1.63 kPa
o Elevation, z = 4.000m (level 1) 1.54 kPa
Distribution of Wind Force on each Frames
Frame A and D (Outer Transverse Frame)
o Level 3 18.92 kN
o Level 2 17.59 kN
o Level 1 16.76 kN
Frame B and C (Inner Transverse Frame)
o Level 3 37.84 kN
o Level 2 35.18 kN
o Level 1 33.52 kN
Frame 1 and 3 (Outer Longitudinal Frame)
o Level 3 10.67 kN
o Level 2 9.79 kN
o Level 1 9.23 kN
Frame 2 (Inner Longitudinal Frame)
o Level 3 21.35 kN
o Level 2 19.57 kN
o Level 1 18.46 kN
30
Earthquake Loads
Occupancy Category
For the purpose of earthquake-resistant design, each structure shall be placed in one of
the occupancy categories listed in Table 103-1 of the National Structural Code of the Philippines.
NSCP Table 208-1 assigns importance factors, I and I p. In this design we will use the 1.00 as the
value of importance factor for standard occupancy structures.
2 of NSCP.
31
Where the following soil profile type are define as follows:
Seismic Zone
The Philippine archipelago is divided into two seismic zones only as shown in figure
208.1 of the National Structural Code of the Philippines. Each structure shall be assigned a
seismic zone factor, Z, in accordance with Table 208-3 of the NSCP. In this design, our seismic
zone is ZONE 4 with a seismic zone factor, Z of 0.40.
32
Seismic Source Type
NSCP table 208-4 defines the types of seismic source. On the other hand, the location
and type of seismic sources to be used for design shall be established based on approved
geological data. In this design, the structure is approximated to be 5km from the Surigao Fault
System as shown in the map. Seismic Source Type A is assumed.
In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned near-source factors in accordance with
Tables 208-5 and 208-6 on the Seismic Source Type as set forth in Section 208.4.4.2 of the
National Structural Code of the Philippines.
33
Hence, the close distance to known seismic source is approximately 7.0 km for seismic
source type B as shown, for this purpose the Near-Source Factor Na is 1.20 and Nv is 1.60.
34
Coefficient R and ΩO
The value for coefficient R and Ωo shall be taken from NSCP table208-11. In this design,
R has 8.5 value and Ωo has 2.8 value as assumed.
35
Structure Period
As per NSCP, the value of T shall be determined by two methods as specified in section
208.5.5.2. For this specific purpose, method A shall be used.
Method A:
36
Seismic Load Calculation
Total Structure Weight
Roof Deck Dead Load (kN)
o Parapet Wall 557.67
o Floor Dead Load 1746.36
o Beam Weight 1269.68
o Column Weight 184.36
Total: 3758.07
3rd Floor Level
o Interior Wall 1793.36
o Exterior Wall 1044.96
o Floor Dead Load 2132.46
o Beam Weight 1269.68
o Column Weight 407.81
Total: 6648.27
2nd Floor Level
o Interior Wall 1793.36
o Exterior Wall 1044.96
o Floor Dead Load 2132.46
o Beam Weight 1269.68
o Column Weight 407.81
Total: 6648.27
Total Dead Load of the Structure: 10,406.34 kN
37
Base Shear Calculation
38
SLAB DESIGN
One-Way or Two-Way Slab?
The table shows all the slab dimensions of the structure: 2nd floor to the Roof deck.
As a result, all the slabs will be designed as a Two-Way Slab.
Where:
La = Shorter length of the Slab
Lb = Longer Length of the Slab
Using the ACI moment coefficient method, the overall thickness of the slab is
100mm.
39
o Floor Finishes
Ceramic or Quarry Tile (20 mm) 0.770 kPa
Concrete Fill Finish 0.460 kPa
o Frame Partition/Frame Walls
Windows, glass, frames, and sash 0.380 kPa
Total Dead Load 4.420 kPa
40
Load Combination
2nd Floor and 3rd Floor Level
U = 1.4(D) 6.118 kPa
U = 1.2(D) + 1.6(L) 26.74 kPa
Rooftop Level
U = 1.4(D) 4.750 kPa
U = 1.2(D) + 1.6(L) 7.108 kPa
41
ULTIMATE MOMENT LOAD, MU (ACI moment coefficient method)
Shown below are the slabs labelled according to the different cases, for 2nd floor to the
roof deck, which will be used to determine the coefficients for moments in slabs. Dimensions are
shown according to the clear span of both long and short spans.
Case 2:
4000 x 3000 mm
4000 x 2500 mm
Case 4
4000 x 4000 mm
Case 9
4000 x 4000 mm
42
4000 x 3000 mm
4000 x 2500 mm
Sample Computation:
Case 4: 4000 x 4000 mm
Solution:
m = 4000/4000 = 1
Coefficients:
Table 1 – Coefficient for Negative Moments in Slabs
o Ca,neg 0.050
o Cb, neg 0.050
Table 2 – Coefficient for Dead Load Positive Moments in Slabs
o Ca,DL 0.027
o Cb, DL 0.027
Table 3 – Coefficient for Live Load Positive Moments in Slabs.
o Ca, LL 0.032
o Cb, LL 0.032
Moments
For shorter length (la)
o Mneg(Cont.) = Ca,negwula2 = 0.050*26.744*42 = 26.102 kN.m
M ¬(Cont .)
o Mneg(Disc.) = = 8.701 kN.m
3
o Mpos = Ca,DLwDLla2 + Ca,LLwLLla2
o Mpos = (0.27)(4.42)(4)2 + (0.32)(13.40)(4)2 = 7.746 kN.m
For longer length (lb)
o Mneg(Cont.) = Cb,negwulb2 = 0.050*26.744*42 = 14.121 kN.m
M ¬(Cont .)
o Mneg(Disc.) = = 4.707 kN.m
3
o Mpos = Cb,DLwDLlb2 + CbLLwLLlb2
o Mpos = (0.027)(4.42)(4)2 + (0.032)(13.40)(4)2 = 7.146 kN.m
43
44
SPACING REINFORCEMENT BAR
Solve Ru:
Mu
Ru =
Φb d 2
Where:
Mu = Factor Moment (N.mm)
b = 1000 mm
ɸ = .90 (for flexural reinforcement slab)
d(short) = h – clear cover – db/2
d(long) = h – clear cover – 3db/2
db = 12 mm ɸ (nominal diameter of bars)
Clear cover = 20mm
45
The least of the following will be used as Snew:
Snew = 2(h) = 2(100) = 200 mm
= 3(h) = 3(100) = 300 mm
= 450 mm
= solved value of S
The new S must be the greater than the greatest of the following:
S = 50 mm + 12 mm = 62 mm
= 2db = 24 mm
4
= d
3 agg
Sample Solution:
@ Slab A; short-span (la), Mpositive
12
dshort = 100 – 20 - = 74
2
6
6.327∗10
Ru = 2 = 1.284
0.9∗1000∗74
21
ρ = 0.85 ¿ = 0.00476
280
113.10
S= = 321.08
0.00476(74)
S = 200 mm
46
Design of Footing
Material Properties:
Reinforced Yield Strength of Stee (fy) 280 MPa
Concrete Compressive Strength (f’c) 27.58 MPa
Concrete Unit Weight (γc) 23.6 kN/m3
Soil Properties:
Allowable Soil Pressure (SBC) 200 kPa
Soil Unit Weight (γs) 20 kPa
Depth of Excavation (h) 1 meter
Column Footing
Column Width 400
Column Length 400
47
Area of Footing Required:
0.10 ( P )+ P 0.10 (183.33 )+183.33
= = = 1 m2 = 1000 mm2
SBC 200
Footing Dimension:
= √ Area of Fooring Required = √ 1.00 = 1 m
Therefore Footing Dimension = 1m x 1m
Thickness of the Footing:
l f −l c 2 1
Factor Moment (Mu) = P * lf * ( ) * ; lf = length of footing, lc = length of
2 2
column
1−0.4 2 1
= 183.33 * 1 * ( ) * = 8.25 kN.m
2 2
√
6
= 8.25 x 10 = 50 mm = 200 mm
0.138∗27.58 .∗1000
- Footing Thickness must be at least 200 mm (NSCP 2015: 414.3.2.1)
Check for 2-way Shear
Factored Soil Pressure (q) = P/Area of Footing Required
= 183.33/1000 = 0.183 MPa
Factored Shear Force = (q(lf2 – (lc + d)2) )/1000
= (0.183(10002 – (400 + 200)2))/1000 = 117.12 kN
48
Soil Unit Weight = 18 kN/m3
Gross Bearing Capacity = (23.6*1*1*0.20) + (20 *(1-0.20)*1*1) + 183.33
= 204.054 kPa
Gross Bearing Capacity < Gross Bearing Capacity OK!
Final Total Thickness of Footing (df) = Assumed Footing Thickness + Clear Cover + Diameter
of Rebar + Diameter of Rebar/2
= 200 + 50 + 12 +12/2 = 268 mm
= 300 mm is used as Thickness of Footing
Find Area of Steel Reinforcement
l f −l c
l f −l c
Mu = q(lf * * 2 )
2
2
1−0.40
1−0.40
= 0.183(1 * * 2 )
2
2
= 8.235 kN.m
Number of bars to be used
Ast fy
Mu = 0.87 fy Ast d (1− )
bdf ' c
Ast = 173.11 mm2
Ast (min) = 0.12/100 * lc *df
= 0.12/100 * 1000 * 300
= 360 mm2
Therefore use Ast = 360 mm2
Number of bars to be used = Ast / Area or rebar = 360/113.10 = 3.18 = 4
1000−50−50−12
Spacing = = 296 mm or use 250 mm spacing c/c
4−1
49
ETab Parameters
The The model is set to the following codes specifically the Concrete Design Code which
is ACI 318-14.
50
51
Beams and Columns used are the dimensions stated earlier in the paper.
52
53
54
55