Middle Jurassic Arc Reversal Victoriakatha Block and Sibumasu Terrane Collision Jadeite Formation and Western Tin Belt Generation Myanmar
Middle Jurassic Arc Reversal Victoriakatha Block and Sibumasu Terrane Collision Jadeite Formation and Western Tin Belt Generation Myanmar
www.cambridge.org/geo
Block and Sibumasu Terrane collision, jadeite
formation and Western Tin Belt generation,
Myanmar
Original Article
Cite this article: Mitchell A, MTH, and KMH Andrew Mitchell , Myint Thein Htay and Kyaw Min Htun
(2021) Middle Jurassic arc reversal, Victoria–
Katha Block and Sibumasu Terrane collision, Myanmar Precious Resources Group, Room 302, Shwe Than Lwin Condominium, New University Avenue road, Aye
jadeite formation and Western Tin Belt Yeik Thar Street, Bahan Township, Yangon, Myanmar
generation, Myanmar. Geological Magazine
158: 1487–1503. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S0016756821000066 Abstract
Myanmar is occupied by the N-wards continuation of the Sunda arc and by the Shan Plateau
Received: 21 August 2020
and its continuation through Yunnan into Tibet. Our new tectonic interpretation of the ophio-
Revised: 13 January 2021
Accepted: 13 January 2021 lite–flysch belts, world-famous jadeite and tin deposits in Myanmar west of the Salween adopts
First published online: 5 April 2021 previous proposals that, before 450-km post-early Oligocene dextral displacement along the
Sagaing Fault, the ophiolite belt in NE Myanmar continued through the topography that is
Keywords: now located west of the fault in the Indo-Burman Ranges. Differences in cross-section through
Indian Ocean; jade; Mondaung arc; Neo-Tethys;
ophiolite; orogenic flysch; epithermal gold Mogok and the Shan Scarps are reconciled by the recently proposed emplacement, in our view
during Permian time, of the Mogok Metamorphic Group onto the Slate Belt to form Sibumasu.
Author for correspondence: Andrew Mitchell, We argue that during Early Jurassic time a Neo-Tethys ophiolite nappe was obducted over tur-
Email: [email protected] bidites on Sibumasu’s passive western margin. Following reversal in tectonic polarity, the
remaining Neo-Tethys subducted E-wards generating the 113–128 Ma Mondaung Arc.
During ocean closure the Victoria–Katha Block and its Triassic flysch subducted beneath
Sibumasu, resulting in jadeite veins in overlying serpentinite that ascended in the subduction
zone and were exhumed at Hpakant and Nat Hmaw, bordering the Jade Mines Uplift.
Subduction of the Indian Ocean since Albian time generated the Popa–Loimye arc, while exten-
sional faulting led to uplift of the Indo-Burman Ranges and to the formation of the Western Tin
Belt granites. Tectonic effects in Myanmar of the India–Asia collision may be confined to the
Disang thrust belt in the Naga Hills.
1. Introduction
Myanmar west of the Salween River (Fig. 1) is of considerable geological interest because of its
position between the Indus–Yarlung suture zone and Lhasa block in Tibet, and the active Sunda
arc system and western part of the Shan Plateau, and because of its varied and valuable mineral
deposits, many of which were in production prior to World War 1. Since the early 1970s, great
progress has been made in defining a Shan–Thai, Sibumasu (Fig. 1) or Sibuma Block occupying
most of the Shan Plateau in eastern Myanmar, and in relating the post-Early Cretaceous Popa–
Loimye arc (e.g. Mitchell & McKerrow, 1975; Metcalfe, 1984; Barber et al. 2017; Cai et al. 2020)
and its mineralization (Goossens, 1978; United Nations, 1978; Gardiner et al. 2016, 2018; Khin
Zaw, 2017; Mitchell, 2017; Ye Myint Swe et al. 2017; Aung Zaw Myint, pers. comm., 2020) to
subduction of the Indian Ocean or Neo-Tethys (Li et al. 2020) beneath Myanmar. However,
despite many proposals as emphasized by Racey (2017), there is no consensus on the earlier
Mesozoic tectonic evolution of Myanmar west of the Salween, and few interpretations discuss
the Neo-Tethys subduction zone required to generate the Lower Cretaceous Mondaung mag-
matic arc in the Shan Scarps.
Probably the earliest attempts to identify small continental blocks and suture zones in or near
Myanmar were those of Hutchison (1973) in recognizing in eastern Malaya a Permian magmatic
arc and Stauffer (1974) in proposing a suture zone along the Bentong–Raub line at the eastern
margin of his West Malaya Block. Stauffer continued the Bentong-Raub line northwards
through Thailand and invoked late Triassic ocean closure by westward subduction. Mitchell
(1977) projected Stauffer’s suture zone through Chiang Rai (Fig. 2) into eastern Myanmar,
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge and inferred E-wards subduction beneath Hutchison’s eastern Malaya arc, followed by ocean
University Press. closure and generation of the Late Triassic tin-bearing granites in the Main Range Malaysia and
NW Thailand within the underthrust passive eastern margin of Stauffer’s West Malaya Block.
Metcalfe (1984, 2013) re-named this block Sibumasu, developed earlier ideas on the West
Burma island block of Mitchell (1979) and its Mesozoic accretion to eastern Myanmar, and
related Myanmar’s suture zones to the evolving Tethys.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
1488 A Mitchell et al.
More recently many authors have supported the presence of Myanmar along a structure near the future Sagaing Fault in the
two blocks – West Myanmar and Sibumasu – between Indo- Triassic (Barber & Crow, 2009).
China and India during Mesozoic time (e.g. Mitchell, 1986; In this paper we put forward a new tectonic interpretation of
Gardiner et al. 2014, 2015, 2016). Others (Mitchell et al. 2012; Myanmar’s evolution west of the Salween based on two speculative
Deng et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2014) have projected within former hypotheses. The first of these is the long-proposed post-
Sibumasu an additional suture zone SW-wards into Myanmar Eocene dextral displacement on the Sagaing Fault of Win Swe
from the Santiashan (Luxi) zone (Fig. 1) of Mo et al. (1993) in (1972). Early estimates of this displacement ranged from
Yunnan. This zone, part of the Medial Myanmar Suture Zone 300 km (Mitchell, 1977) to 460 km (Curray et al. 1979). Morley
(Mitchell et al. 2015) along the Shan Scarp (Fig. 1), lies between & Arboit (2019) reviewed later proposals for c. 100 km to
the reduced Sibumasu or Sibuma block (Ridd, 2016) to the SE > 400 km of displacement on the Sagaing Fault and, from detrital
and the Tengchong block of Deng et al. (2014), Wang et al. zircon ages on sedimentary rocks in the North Minwun exten-
(2014) and Gardiner et al. (2018) to the NW. Ridd et al. (2019) sional basin 270 km north of Mandalay, together with extrapola-
invoked a larger Tengchong–Hukawng block that collided with tion of the present-day movement rate back to 27 Ma, inferred a
Sibuma during early Tertiary time, after which the southern part possible 486 km of displacement since middle Oligocene time. We
of this block moved N-wards on the Sagaing Fault to become here infer (Fig. 2) a provisional total dextral displacement of
the Hukawng Basin (Fig. 1). Others (e.g. Searle et al. 2017) inferred c. 450 km. The second hypothesis is for a major E–W (present ori-
a Mawgyi arc, additional to the West Myanmar block, between entation) crustal shortening (Fig. 3) of at least several tens of kilo-
Sibumasu and India. metres to explain the juxtaposition along the Shan Scarp (Fig. 1) of
Models in which Sibumasu is the only block between Indo- the Shan Plateau or Sibuma in the east with the Shan Scarps, part of
China and India south of the latitude of Mogok (e.g. Gardiner Bender’s (1983) Karen–Tenasserim unit, and western Myanmar in
et al. 2016, 2018; Zhang et al. 2018) are not easily reconciled with the west. In our interpretation (Fig. 3) this shortening took place
the need for a root or suture zone for the ophiolites and their meta- on a regional W-directed thrust which emplaced the Shan Plateau
morphic soles in the Indo-Burman Ranges (Figs 1, 2) and in the succession with migmatites of the Mogok Metamorphic Belt at
Tagaung–Myitkyina Belt (Fig. 1). Other interpretations invoke the base, over the Slate Belt, partly Carboniferous in age, in the
dextral strike-slip for emplacement either of the Shan Scarps of Scarps and southern Myanmar (Tanintharyi). We explain the
Dutt (1942) and western Myanmar along the Shan Scarp otherwise problematic presence (Mitchell et al. 2004; Ridd,
(Fig. 1) in the Cretaceous (Ridd & Watkinson, 2013), or of western 2017) of middle Permian – Triassic Plateau Limestone in the east
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
Arc reversal and block collision, Myanmar 1489
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
1490 A Mitchell et al.
Sagaing Fault (Fig. 1); the Kumon Range has not been mapped geo- fig. 7.12) and Mitchell et al. (2020b) argued that in the Mogok
logically and is not considered further here. region and the Shan Scarps the Slate Belt is overthrust by the
Along its southern and eastern margins the Tagaung– Mogok Metamorphic Belt, but around Mogok the Slate Belt has
Myitkyina Belt is juxtaposed on the high-angle Kyaukpyu Fault yet to be exhumed. We therefore regard at least part of the
(Fig. 1) with metamorphic rocks that, together with granites, Tengchong Block as the continuation of the Shan Scarps rather
occupy the Mogok Metamorphic Belt and is up to 40 km wide. than as the discrete block of Gardiner et al. (2018), bordered on
In the world-famous Mogok gem district, the belt consists of diop- the SE by the speculatively named Medial Myanmar Suture
side phlogopite spinel-bearing marble in which ruby occurs in the Zone. Lower Cretaceous intrusions in the Slate Belt form part of
absence of spinel, and sapphire is associated with syenite. the recently identified Mondaung Arc (Fig. 2) of Lin et al.
Suggested stratigraphic ages of the belt, debated for over a century, (2019a), described further in Section 4.
range from Archaen to Cretaceous, and metamorphic ages from Mitchell et al. (2012) and Mitchell (2017, p. 231) argued that
Archaen to Miocene. Searle et al. (2020) have shown that the syen- within the Scarps zircon U–Pb ages on the Nattaung granite SE
ites are accompanied by charnockite and that both occur as Jurassic of Yamethin (Fig. 2) and on a diorite intruding migmatite near
sills. They identify a granulite facies event that occurred during Payangazu (Fig. 1) constrain the age of the main metamorphic fab-
68–21 Ma (Fig. 4) in which the gemstones were generated from ric in the Mogok Metamorphic Belt to > 72 Ma and probably to
metamorphism of skarns and marbles. Sutherland et al. (2019) > 128 Ma, a conclusion dismissed by Searle et al. (2020, p. 2)
obtained an age of 32.4 Ma for ruby, and Myint Myat Phyo et al. who claimed that the authors thought they were dating the regional
(2020) reported zircon U–Pb ages of Oligocene – early Miocene for metamorphism.
a granulite facies event affecting spinel and ruby in the Mogok
gemfields. Spinel and ruby-bearing marble and migmatites con-
2.b. Belts west of the Sagaing Fault
tinue S-wards to Mandalay Hill (at Mandalay, Fig. 1) and migma-
tites occur intermittently through the Shan Scarps where, as the Myanmar west of the Sagaing Fault can be divided into the Central
mixed gneisses of Dutt (1942), they occupy a wide belt east of Myanmar Basin with crust of normal continental thickness (Sloan
Naypyidaw (Bateson et al. 1972), and occur at Payangazu and at et al. 2017), and the Indo-Burman Ranges (Fig. 1). The basin is
Kyaikkami south of Moulmein (Thet Paing Kyaw Win et al. 2020). bisected by the Popa–Loimye magmatic arc, a discontinuous chain
South of Mogok (Fig. 1) the margin of the Metamorphic Belt is of magmatic rocks of middle Cretaceous – Quaternary age, sepa-
juxtaposed on an unnamed extensional fault (Mitchell, 2017, fig. 2.7) rated from the Sagaing Fault by the Shwebo Basin and from the
with the overlying upper Proterozoic flyschoid Chaung Magyi Group, Indo-Burman Ranges by a fore-arc basin (Win Swe 1981) with
which underlies the Palaeozoic Shan Plateau succession as explained up to 17 km (Pivnic et al. 1998) of Albian–Quaternary sedimentary
further in Section 3. The plateau succession (Fig. 3b) consists of the rocks. The fore-arc basin is divided into sub-basins, of which the
silicic Bawdwin Volcanics Formation and, as described in the recent Chindwin and Hukawng are separated by the metamorphic rocks
review by Aye Ko Aung (2020), of overlying upper Cambrian clastic (Chhibber 1934a, p. 25) of the Jade Mines Uplift (Fig. 1).
sediments, Ordovician–Devonian predominantly carbonate forma- In the southern part of the Indo-Burman Ranges (Fig. 1),
tions, local lower Carboniferous sandstones and shales, the lower United Nations (1979a) recognized an Eastern Belt of meta-sedi-
Permian Yinyaw Formation of Hobson (1941), and Permian – mentary rocks, Triassic flysch, ophiolites and pillow basalts, and a
Upper Triassic Plateau Limestone (Thura Oo et al. 2002). An Western Belt of Campanian and Maastrichtian mudstones and
Upper Triassic – Lower Jurassic flysch locally overlies the Plateau Globotruncana-bearing pelagic limestones of the Falam
Limestone and is succeeded by a Middle and Upper Jurassic shal- Formation, exposed in eroded anticlines between lower
low-marine formation and the overlying Kalaw (Hsipaw) Red Palaeogene turbidite sandstones and mudstones preserved in
Beds. We consider that the succession on the Shan Plateau, part of high-elevation synclines (Mitchell 2017, figs 11.5, 11.6). The flysch,
Sibuma (Ridd, 2016), continues through Baoshan (Fig. 1) in ophiolites and basalts of the Eastern Belt are overlain in the east by
Yunnan into the Qiangtang Block in Tibet, and through northwestern the middle Cretaceous Orbitolina Limestone, locally succeeded by
Thailand and peninsular Malaysia. We see little evidence for the pro- the Campanian–Maastrichtian Kabaw Formation of Aung Khin &
posal of Gardiner et al. (2018) that a Baoshan Block was separate dur- Kyaw Win (1968) and Win Swe (1972), equivalent to the Falam
ing Palaeozoic time from Sibumasu. Formation of the Western Belt. The Orbitolina Limestone and
The Shan Scarps lie east of the Sagaing Fault and west of the Kabaw Formation are the basal formations of the fore-arc basin.
Paung Laung–Mawchi Zone (Fig. 1), a narrow belt bordering In the Naga Hills, Bannert et al. (2011) and Aitchison et al.
the Shan Plateau. The Scarps consist of the Slate Belt and (2019) describe their Naga Metamorphics that underlie the
Mogok Metamorphic Belt. The Slate Belt is composed of the 3826-m elevation Mount Sarameti (Fig. 2) in the east, and are
Mergui Group, a thick succession of argillites, slates and quartzites translated NW-wards on the Sarameti Thrust over ophiolitic rocks
with 516-Ma detrital zircons (Kyaw Linn Zaw et al. 2020) overlain within a mud-matrix melange. The Waziho Thrust, equivalent to
by Carboniferous diamictites, and the Taungnyo Group that is the Kheng Fault in the Chin and Rakhine Hills (Fig. 2), carries the
present near Moulmein (Fig. 1). In most places the Slate Belt occu- ophiolites and melange over the Tertiary Indo-Burman flysch of
pies the eastern part of the Shan Scarps, and its boundary with the Bannert et al. (2011). The flysch is correlated with the Disang
Mogok Metamorphic Belt to the west is the steep W-dipping Group of Evans (1964) by Aitchison et al. (2019), who consider
Sakhanya Taung Fault, here interpreted as an early Permian thrust it to be derived from and deposited on the Indian Plate. For
(Fig. 3). The Slate Belt is absent from the Mogok region, but reap- Aitchison et al. (2019) the India–Myanmar suture zone is the
pears south of Tengchong and continues through the ‘Tengchong Waziho Thrust, while for Yang et al. (2020) in the Chin Hills
Block’ in Yunnan into NE Myanmar where it forms a 300-km long the suture is the Kaladan Fault (Fig. 2), which they project
belt east of the Mogok Metamorphic Belt (Fig. 1). Mitchell (2017, NE-wards into the Naga Thrust of Evans (1964) in Assam.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
Arc reversal and block collision, Myanmar 1491
Fig. 4. Ages (Ma) of selected post-205-Ma rock units and geological events in Myanmar west of Salween. Details of isotopic age determinations in text.
3. The Katha–Gangaw–Mogok cross-section: E-vergent dacitic dykes. Near Myitkyina, Yang et al. (2012) reported
orogeny and reversal in tectonic polarity Middle Jurassic (c. 173 Ma) zircon U–Pb ages of basalt, leucogab-
East of the Sagaing Fault near Mogok the SE-dipping succession bro, plagiogranite and pyroxenite, and Liu et al. (2016) obtained
(Fig. 5) of the Mogok Metamorphic Belt is overlain by the Upper Jurassic ages of c. 162 Ma on diorites and gabbro. The iso-
Chaung Magyi Group on an unnamed structure. This has been lated Tagaung Taung (hill), shown on Figure 1, consists of
interpreted as an extensional fault (Mitchell, 2017), possibly the chromitite-bearing dunites and harzburgites overlying a metamor-
continuation of the Myittha Chaung Fault (Fig. 2), because at phic sole thrust over cherts (United Nations, 1979b) containing
the lithological boundary sericite semi-schists (Chaung Magyi) uppermost Jurassic – Aptian (Teza Kyaw et al. 2020) radiolaria,
overlie high-grade schists and gneisses (Mogok Belt) to the NW, and locally over Upper Triassic turbidites. South of Tagaung,
and because a SE-dipping fault could explain evidence for late Maung Maung et al. (2014) described uppermost Jurassic cherts
Cenozoic uplift of the Metamorphic Belt. The Chaung Magyi overlying red mudstones. The middle Cretaceous Orbitolina
Group is overlain unconformably by the Cambrian–Tertiary suc- Limestone of Sahni (1937), preserved in synclines, lies unconform-
cession that includes the Upper Triassic – Lower Jurassic Napeng ably on the Ngapyawdaw Chaung Formation.
flysch. In the Tagaung–Myitkyina Belt NW of the Mogok We interpret the Napeng turbidites on the Plateau (Fig. 5a) as
Metamorphic Belt and Kyaukhpyu Fault (Fig. 1), pillowed and an orogenic flysch deposited on and west of the Sibumasu passive
massive basalts, diabase dykes, andesites and volcanogenic sedi- continental margin, and ophiolitic rocks in the Tagaung–
ments of the Ngapyawdaw Chaung Formation, and serpentinites Myitkyina Belt and at Santiashan (Chu et al. 2009) in southwestern
and chlorite schists (Than Tun & Khin Myint, personal commu- Yunnan as part of an oceanic arc obducted E-wards over the flysch
nication, 2002), are intruded by hornblende biotite granites and and accreted to the western margin of Sibumasu during Early
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
1492 A Mitchell et al.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
Arc reversal and block collision, Myanmar 1493
Sagaing
M PLATEAU
MAR
18°
Fault
18°
THAI-
Yangon
Moul-
mein 16°
16°
Eastern limit
of Slate Belt
& tin granites
ANDAMAN
SEA Kn
K
Dawei W 14°
14° H B
Pg
CRETACEOUS-
EOCENE
P
GRANITES
Myeik
SHAN PLATEAU
SUCCESSION,
PHANEROZOIC T 12°
12°
SLATE BELT,
THAILAND
GULF OF
CARBONIFEROUS
Bo Y
& OLDER
MOGOK META-
MORPHIC BELT
a – augen gneiss and gneissic granite; B – Bon Schist; D – diorite; G – two-mica granite; LAND
96° 98° 100°
Gd – granodiorite; Gs – Sedo Granite and equivalents; Jl – Loi-an Formation; JKp
– Pettalet Formation; Kk – Kalaw Red Beds; Kp – Pyinyaung Formation; m – marble;
Pt – Thitsipin Limestone, locally including Yin Yaw Formation; PTn – Nwabangyi Fig. 7. Map of principal (Myanmar) segment of Western Tin Belt of Myanmar
Dolomite; Q – alluvium; SBG – Scarps Border granite; Te – Neogene sediments; and Thailand showing location of larger of 400 lode tin and tungsten mines described
TJp – Pinmon East Limestone; TJs – Shweminbon Formation; YWD – Yinmabin by Clegg (1944). B – Bwabin (W,Sn); Bo – Bokpyin (Sn,W); H – Hermyingyi (W,Sn);
West Diorite. Mogok Metamorphics: y – Yinmabin Schist; ms – migmatites and schist. K – Kalonta (Sn,W); Ka – Kanbauk (Sn,W); M – Mawchi (Sn,W); P – Palauk (W,Sn);
Slate Belt: Cp – Kogwe Mudstone; Pzw – Poklokkale Wacke; PMZ – Paung Pa – Padatgyaung (W); Pe – Pedwe Taung (W); Pg – Pagaye (W,Sn); T – Tagu
Laung-Mawchi Zone; Sk – Shweminbon Au–Cu skarns; Ym – Yamethin. Location on (W,Sn); Th – Than Island (W); W – Wagon (W,Sn); Y – Yadanabon (W,Sn). From Clegg
Figure 1. Partly from Myanmar Geosciences Society (2014). (1944), Geological Map of Myanmar (2014) and Gardiner et al. (2016).
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
1494 A Mitchell et al.
Fig. 9. Cross-sections in early Cretaceous (a) and present-day (b) through Payangazu and Pyinyaung in Shan Scarps onto Shan Plateau showing geological evolution. The
Victoria-Katha plate consists of part of Neo-Tethys plus the Victoria-Katha Block. PMZ Paung Laung-Mawchi Zone. Yebokson Granodiorite, dacite sills and Patchaung
Volcanics are part of Mondaung Arc. Mergui Gp is part of Slate Belt. Location on Figures 2, 6.
The Lawa Diorite (Fig. 6) hosts gold-copper skarn deposits 5. Chin Hills and Sin Chaung extensional fault,
(Khin Zaw 2017; Mitchell, 2017) and an iron skarn with an asso- Indo-Burman Ranges
ciated major magnetic anomaly; copper-gold skarns occur else-
where in the arc. Undated dacitic and andesitic dykes intruding The southern Chin Hills (Fig. 10a), the best-known segment of the
auriferous veins of the Modi Taung orogenic gold district Indo-Burman Ranges, are described here because the Chin Hills
(Mitchell et al. 2004) shown on Figure 6 may be part of the structure is comparable to that of the Naga Hills – Jade Mines area,
Mondaung arc, suggesting that the veins formed before 128 Ma. discussed in Section 6.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
Arc reversal and block collision, Myanmar 1495
Fig. 10. Southern Chin Hills, Indo-Burman Ranges. (a) Geological sketch map of Sin Chaung–Mahin Chaung valley, eastern limb of Mindat Anticline. Narrow pink areas along Sin
Chaung Fault are pillowed basalt, Orbitolina Limestone and Kabaw Formation. A – Apaw; K – Kanpetlet; L – Laungshe; S – Saw; SG – Swe Le Gyin; SK – Su boke kyin; T – Thigon.
Location shown on Figure 1. (b) Schematic composite cross-section through Sin Chaung valley and Fault near 21° N, not to scale, thickness of Orbitolina Limestone exaggerated to
show limestone lithologies and serpentinite sheets.
The Upper Triassic Pane Chaung Group of United Nations Mitchell (1986) interpreted the Pane Chaung Group as an oro-
(1979a) is equivalent to the Thanbaya Formation described in genic flysch deposited on the passive eastern margin of his Mount
1970s unpublished reports by the then Burma Oil Corporation Victoria Land, a continental fragment that we include here in the
and, although not reported by Brunnschweiler (1966), is widespread Victoria–Katha Block; deformation of the flysch was explained by
in the Eastern Belt of the Chin Hills (Fig. 10a) and Arakan (Rakhine) obduction of ophiolite onto the block during the Late Jurassic
Yoma. The Pane Chaung Group is a thick deformed sandstone tur- Epoch. More recently, Sevastjanova et al. (2015) inferred from
bidite formation or flysch with widespread broken beds, overturned detrital zircons that the flysch was derived from the area east of
locally horizontal bedding, and Upper Triassic Daonella reported by the Palaeo-Tethys suture zone in easternmost Myanmar (Fig. 2).
Theobald (1871) and Gramman (1974). United Nations (1979a) The cross-sections of Zhang et al. (2018) similarly indicate that
showed that the group is underlain by Brunnschweiler’s (1966) the Pane Chaung flysch was derived from Myanmar and accreted
Kanpetlet Schist, which includes deformed pillowed basalts metamor- to its western margin. Cai et al. (2020) have since reported
phosed to quartz-epidote-albite schist. Within the flysch in the 200–290-Ma-aged detrital zircons in the Pane Chaung flysch, cor-
northern Chin Hills, United Nations (1979a) mapped ultramafic related it with the Triassic flysch of the Tethyan Himalaya, and
bodies including Webula Taung with its metamorphic sole, from concluded that the Pane Chaung flysch was deposited in an
which they inferred that the ophiolite was obducted W-wards onto Upper Triassic submarine fan along the northern margin of
the flysch. The flysch is overlain by pillowed basalts (Fig. 10b) previ- Australia, and derived from West Papua.
ously regarded as part of the ophiolite, but here they are interpreted as Limestone containing the Albian–Cenomanian foraminifera
equivalent to the Mawgyi Volcanic Group in the Popa–Loimye arc. Orbitolina was described by Gramman (1974) from stream sec-
Rare mafic dykes intrude the flysch. Recent work has established tions east of Mount Victoria in the southern Chin Hills, and to
zircon U–Pb ages of 127 Ma for plagiogranite in the Webula ultra- the south (Fig. 10a) by United Nations (1979a) who reported an
mafic body and 116 Ma for its amphibolitic sole (Liu et al. 2016), upper Albian ammonite, and a basal conglomerate with clasts of
the latter indicating the approximate age of the obduction which basalt and ?Triassic sandstone lying depositionally on Triassic
accompanied closure of the Neo-Tethys. The presence of radiolarian flysch. The limestone provided a minimum age for flysch deforma-
cherts with Middle and latest Jurassic and middle Early Cretaceous tion beneath the advancing ophiolite and for eruption of the pil-
ages in the Naga Hills (Aitchison et al. 2019) and Middle Jurassic ages lowed basalt. The limestone was penetrated in an oil borehole in
in the Chin Hills (Zhang et al. 1918) indicates that oceanic rocks in the east of the fore-arc basin and overlies the Mawgyi Volcanic
the Tagaung–Myitkyina Belt and Indo-Burman Ranges have a Group on the western flank of the Popa–Loimye arc (United
similar maximum age. Nations, 1978; Mitchell, 2017, p. 289).
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
1496 A Mitchell et al.
Putao
INDIAN
)
h
sch
h
CONTINENT
flysc
c
g flys
(fly
CK
ne
S A GA
Napeng t u r b i d i t e s
ophiolite over
BLO
l i t e over Napen
oce
128 - 113 Ma
eo ysch
-E
NG
IN
T
BEL
fl
us
CHO
ng
RA
sa
i
ac
D Myitkyina Tengchong
et
AW
r
–
rC INDIAN
NG
G–
o phio
G
Naga
e
UN
pp
GA
TEN
GA
U Luxi
A -
TA
V
KATH
sic
NEO - TETHYS IN
rias
AR
sic
T
A
OCEAN
nt
r T
EL
YIN
ur -
rus ese
as
B
r J sic
LATE JURASSIC -
ITK
pe
T.
pr
ME
we a s
up
MY
t
lo Tri
K
. -
GO
r
Th
pe
Ma
EARLY CRETACEOUS
O
up
HUKAWNG M
ga
AY
06
T- D
hweminbon flysch
Na
IN BASIN Mt.
PRESEN
. 1
WE
e s ( f l y s ch )
Loimye ch
SIBUMASU
STE
l i t e o v e r P a n e Ch f l y s
Arc
f o r M o n d a u ng A r c
RN
imye
JMU
Khamti
N a g a f l y sch
idit
Mandalay
ction z one for Popa - Lo
n turb
SHA
Mt.
K
e over S
Sarameti
N S
bo
EASTERN BELT
CAR
FAULT
emin
CHINDWIN
ophio
zone
hiolit
PS
BASIN Shw
op
Imphal Yamethin
n
o
AR C
o
y
i
lem
ct
NG
Wuntho
ch)
bdu
INDIAN CONTINENT
IM Y E
KHE
a
s
K
subdu
(fly
su
A- LO
FA
CRETACEOUS-CENOZOIC COVER
.
in R
s
U
ite
POP
KATHA BLOCK
ndw
LT
VICTORIA -
BE
bid
au
LT
Chi
ur
nF
Monywa AR
au
WESTERN BELT
ne
SIBUMISU
Fig. 11. Sketch map reconstruction showing Sibumasu and Victoria–Katha Block separated by the Neo-Tethys during Late Jurassic – Early Cretaceous time, and the Victoria–
Katha Block and India separated by the Indian Ocean during Eocene time, with flysch deposits on passive margins of continental blocks, and detached ophiolite slabs prior to their
obduction over the flysch. Jade Mines Uplift (JMU) flanked by Nat Hmaw (west) and Tawmaw (east) jadeite-bearing serpentinites shown in present positions. AR – Ayeyawady
River.
United Nations (1979a) interpreted the Kanpetlet Schist in the Zhang et al. (2018, 2020). The boundary between the Triassic
southern Chin Hills as the core of the Mindat anticline with flysch and the fore-arc basin succession was regarded by
Triassic flysch in the eastern (Fig. 10a) and western limbs. The Chhibber (1934b, p. 220) as a normal fault, later called the
schist has been re-interpreted as either an upthrust wedge Kabaw Fault and interpreted by Yang et al. (2020) as a strike-slip
(Rangin et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2020) as shown in Figure 10, or structure, but the fault is not shown on the cross-sections of Pivnic
a W-overturned fault-bounded anticline (Zhang et al. 2017, et al. (1998) and has not been identified on satellite images.
2018, 2020). The eastern boundary of the Kanpetlet Schist was In our interpretation the Pane Chaung flysch was deposited on
described as a W-dipping reverse fault by Rangin et al. (2013) and oceanwards of the Victoria–Katha Block (Fig. 11), then a part
and Yang et al. (2020), and as an E-dipping normal fault by of Australia in Gondwana (Cai et al. 2020). During the Early
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
Arc reversal and block collision, Myanmar 1497
Cretaceous Epoch the flysch was overthrust by an obducted Neo- of Chhibber (1934b), imply up-dip ascent of hydrothermal water
Tethys ophiolite during the rifting of the block and its drift from beneath the inclined impermeable serpentinite sheets, and replace-
Australia in front of the expanding Indian Ocean. We correlate the ment of overlying limestone. The Sin Chaung Fault at its present ero-
obducted ultramafic rocks in the Chin Hills with the Nat Hmaw sion level forms the eastern boundary of Triassic flysch, suggesting
and Tawmaw serpentinites (Figs 11, 12) flanking the Jade Mines that this fault rather than the inferred Kabaw Fault to the east sepa-
Uplift, and infer that, during ophiolite obduction, the Victoria– rates the Indo-Burman Ranges from the fore-arc basin. Obduction of
Katha Block and its flysch cover subducted beneath Sibumasu the ophiolite before deposition of the limestone cover establishes that
and were since exhumed as the Kanpetlet Schist, as schists in the ophiolite originated in the Neo-Tethys, not in the Indian Ocean to
the Jade Mines Uplift and the Katha–Gangaw Range, and as the the west where subduction began in the Albian (Fig. 11).
meta-sedimentary rocks of probable Ordovican and younger age
reported by Aitchison et al. (2019) in the Naga Metamorphic
Complex (Fig. 1) around Mount Sarameti (Fig. 12). Exhumation 6. Jade Mines Uplift and the Mondaung Arc subduction
may have preceded deposition in the fore-arc basin of the middle zone
Palaeocene – lower Eocene Paunggyi Formation (Fig. 10) that lies With the proposed c. 450-km dextral displacement on the Sagaing
with a regional unconformity on the Kabaw Formation and the Fault restored (Figs 2, 11), the Jade Mines Uplift and adjacent
Paung Chaung (Orbitolina) Limestone. southern Naga Hills lie to the west of the Shan Scarps at latitude
The Orbitolina Limestone is intruded by serpentinite sills or sheets 20° 30' N, while the northeastern end of the fore-arc basin and
up to 10 m thick (Chhibber, 1934b; United Nations, 1979a; Mitchell Naga Hills become continuous with the southwestern end of the
et al. 2010), abundant along the Sin Chaung in the southern Chin Hills Tagaung–Myitkyina Belt and Katha–Gangaw Range.
(Fig. 10a, b), where a conglomerate at the limestone base contains peb- The Jade Mines Uplift (Fig. 11) is separated from the main or east-
bles of Triassic sandstone and basalt. The sills may be similar to those ernmost strand of the Sagaing Fault by a narrow segment of ruby-
reported by Brunnschweiler (1966) in his Senonian limestone. We bearing diopside-phlogopite marble and biotite granite, probably
explain the relationship between the flysch and overlying rocks by the offset N-translated western margin of the Mogok Metamorphic
invoking a regional extensional structure, the Sin Chaung Fault, dis- Belt (e.g. Mitchell et al. 2020b), and by a belt of ultramafic rocks,
placement on which has downthrown the overlying fore-arc basin basalts and Tertiary sediments to the SW. The uplift (Figs 11, 12) con-
succession relative to the ultramafic rocks and underlying flysch in sists of an anticlinal core of amphibolite to lower greenschist facies
the footwall to the west (Fig. 10b). We attribute the dismembered rocks described by Chhibber (1934a) and well-represented among
nature and scattered distribution of the larger ultramafic bodies to cobbles in the Uru Boulder Conglomerate (our unpublished observa-
shearing of a formerly continuous obducted slab as the footwall tions 2004, 2020), bordered on the SE and west by the Tawmaw and
was exhumed, and interpret the serpentinite sheets as sills mobilized Nat Hmaw serpentinites, respectively. The core rocks include sericite
from underlying ophiolite during faulting. We think this zone is schist and quartzite in the Tanai (Chindwin River) gorge (Bannert
unlikely to be a subduction channel analogous to that of Draut & et al. 2011) and north of Nat Hmaw, and we speculate that they
Clift (2013) because displacement post-dates deposition of the are part of the Victoria–Katha Block.
Albian–Cenomanian Orbitolina Limestone and is therefore co-eval The serpentinites are distinctive in hosting jadeite dykes or
with Popa–Loimye arc magmatism, believed by most authors to be veins with a marginal zone of sheared chlorite schist up to
related to subduction near or west of the Kaladan Fault 50 cm wide (Fig. 13). The veins of jadeite (Noetling, 1893) or
(Figs 2, 12). Ophicalcite or listwaenite at the serpentinite–limestone jadeite with an albite rim (Bleeck, 1908) can be up to 10 m wide
contact (United Nations, 1979a; Mitchell, 1985, 1993), the silicic rocks (Chhibber, 1934a, p. 50) but are largely white and not of gem
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
1498 A Mitchell et al.
quality everywhere. Nevertheless, the veins are clearly the lode 7. Popa–Loimye arc, Indian Ocean subduction and the
source of Myanmar’s famed gem-quality jadeite, most of which Western Tin Belt
is produced from the Pliocene–Quaternary poorly lithified Uru
The Popa–Loimye arc (Figs 1, 2, 11), other names for which include
Boulder Conglomerate at Hpakant east of Tawmaw and from con-
the Wuntho–Popa or Western Burma arc (United Nations, 1978;
glomerates of probable Palaeogene age in the folded Tertiary suc-
Mitchell, 2017; Li et al. 2020), is a 700-km-long discontinuous belt
cession south of Hpakant (Chhibber, 1934a) and SW of Nat
of mostly I-type granitic and volcanic rocks of late Early
Hmaw. A hydrothermal origin for the jadeite has been proposed
Cretaceous (106 Ma) to Quaternary age (Fig. 4). The arc, exposed
by many authorities (Harlow & Sorensen 2005; Shi et al. 2005;
in four main uplifts separated by sedimentary cover, includes the
Harlow et al. 2007; Qiu et al. 2009), and zircon U–Pb ages on
92–106 Ma Kanzachaung batholith (United Nations, 1978; Pickard
Hpakant jadeite range from 163 Ma (Shi et al. 2008) through
& Barley, pers. comm., 1996; Mitchell et al. 2012; Lin et al. 2019b);
160 Ma (Yui et al. 2013) to 158 Ma (Qiu et al. 2009) and 77 Ma
33–40 Ma granodioritic to dioritic plutons (United Nations, 1978;
(Yui et al. 2013). 40Ar/39Ar isotopic ages on glaucophane and phen-
Pickard & Barley, pers. comm., 1996; Lin et al. 2019b); 14 Ma rhyolites
gitic muscovites associated with the jadeite are between 45 and
and quartz andesite porphyry intrusions (Yang, 2008; Mitchell et al.
152 Ma (Shi et al. 2014).
2012: Lee et al. 2016) and Pliocene–Quaternary stratovolcanoes and
Following Mitchell (2017, p. 448) and Mitchell et al. (2020a) we
shoshonitic basalt lava flows (Yang, 2008; Lee et al. 2016). Also present
interpret the serpentinite bodies at Tawmaw and Nat Hmaw as the
are 32 Ma sanidine trachytes (United Nations, 1978) and undated gar-
remnants of a formerly continuous jade-bearing serpentinite sheet,
net-bearing granites. The Cretaceous and lower Tertiary intrusive
present in the fore-arc or hanging wall of the subduction zone or
rocks are hosted by the Mawgyi Volcanic Group, consisting of mas-
channel that generated the Mondaung Arc (Fig. 12). As Neo-
sive and pillowed basalts, andesites and minor dacites beneath
Tethys closed and the Victoria–Katha Block underthrust the overrid-
the clastic Mawlin Formation and unconformable Orbitolina
ing Sibumasu plate to depths of perhaps 80 km, hydrothermal fluids
Limestone. In our view, the Mawgyi Volcanic Group is not part of
expelled from the block ascended into the adjacent subduction zone
the Popa–Loimye arc but more probably the continuation of the
and deposited the jadeite veins. Jurassic zircons in the jadeite are
older Ngapyawdaw Chaung Formation within the Tagaung–
inferred to be inherited, perhaps from subducted plagiogranite. We
Myitkyina Belt in its restored position (Fig. 11) to the NE.
speculate that hydrolysis of subducted peridotite led to ascent of
The arc has long been related to subduction of the Indian Ocean,
the jadeite and its buoyant serpentinite host rocks to depths where
the Neo-Tethys of Li et al. (2019), in a trench west of the Indo-
jadeite was evidently stable. Folding of the subduction zone resulted
Burman Ranges as argued elsewhere (e.g. Mitchell, 1986; Steckler
in exhumation of the underlying Victoria–Katha Block to form the
et al. 2008). We infer that the subduction began at c. 110 Ma following
anticlinal metamorphic core of the Jade Mines Uplift (Figs 1, 11).
the closure of the Neo-Tethys and during drift of the Victoria–Katha
West of the Tanai gorge the metamorphic rocks and serpentinites
Block and its Triassic flysch cover (Fig. 11) from Australia as the
are lost beneath Cenozoic sediments but, we suggest, re-appear further
Indian Ocean opened. Yang et al. (2020) conclude that subduction
west in the Indo-Burman Ranges as the ophiolite and Naga
continues today, but that around latitude 23° N the suture zone is
Metamorphic Complex of Bannert et al. (2011) and Aitchison
the Kaladan Fault (Fig. 2) situated between India-derived Neogene
et al. (2019) east of the Waziho Thrust. The Eastern Naga Fault of
and Eurasia-derived accreted Palaeogene sediments, and more than
Bannert et al. (2011) appears to lie at the western margin of the
200 km east of the buried margin of India (Fig. 12). The
Chindwin or Hukawang basins shown on Figure 12, and may be
Palaeogene belt of Yang et al. (2020) includes the Campanian–
the continuation of the Sin Chaung Fault at the eastern margin of
Maastrictian Falam Formation of United Nations (1979a); in the
the Chin Hills.
same way as Zhang et al. (2017, 2020), Yang et al. (2020) consider
We infer that jadeite dykes within the serpentinites were progres-
the Kanpetlet Schist to be metamorphosed Triassic flysch.
sively exposed and eroded during exhumation of the Victoria–Katha
Continuity (Figs 2, 11) of the Kaladan Fault suture zone with the
Block, and that compression during uplift may have led to extrusion
Naga Thrust (Yang et al. 2020) implies that the Eocene Disang
of the jadeite-bearing ductile serpentinite, providing a possible source
Group or flysch east of the thrust, and the Upper Cretaceous
for multi-tonne jadeite blocks in the upper Cenozoic Uru Boulder
Falam Formation in the western Chin Hills and its continuation as
Conglomerate at Hpakant and for cobbles in the Palaeogene jadeite
the Kabaw Formation in the fore-arc basin, were derived from
clast conglomerates. Rounding of the jadeite blocks in the conglom-
Myanmar, rather than derived from and deposited on the Indian
erate during their short transport in the small Uru River from the
Plate as Aitchison et al. (2019) propose. We follow Mitchell (2017,
adjacent lode source is unlikely, and could be explained by abrasian
p. 471) and Aitchison et al. (2019) in inferring deposition of
during their ascent within the serpentinite host rocks.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
Arc reversal and block collision, Myanmar 1499
Disang flysch largely on and seawards of the passive southeastern from the 16–23-Ma Payangazu–Kabaing granitic dykes and plu-
margin of India (Fig. 12), but suggest that subduction after the tons (Mitchell et al. 2020b) within the Mogok Metamorphic Belt
Eocene Epoch took place initially on the Kheng Fault – Waziho (Fig. 6), and from the Mondaung arc (Fig. 2) in the Shan
Thrust and later on the Kaladan Fault – Naga Thrust. We also note Scarps, as indicated in Figure 4.
that the Naga Metamorphic Complex differs from the Kanpetlet We think it unlikely that partial melting, granite emplacement
Schist in being emplaced on a thrust rather than elevated in an anti- and tin mineralization accompanied inferred crustal shortening on
cline or fault-bounded anticline, and that the additional suture zone the Pan Laung Thrust because this would imply that the granites
east of the complex proposed by Aitchison et al. (2019) is probably a were emplaced at depth and exhumed subsequently during uplift
later structure that repeats the Neo-Tethys ophiolite (Fig. 12). We on the Myittha Chaung Fault. Confinement of most of the miner-
infer that at least some of their melange may be equivalent to the bro- alization to the apical parts of the granite plutons implies a rela-
ken beds in the Triassic flysch of the Chin Hills. tively shallow depth during mineralization.
Amalgamation of the Popa–Loimye arc with Eurasia along the
Sagaing Fault after 95 Ma, proposed by Westerweel et al. (2019)
8. Structural position and age of migmatites within the
and Licht et al. (2020), could be explained if the arc faced
Mogok Metamorphic Belt
Eurasia, to the present east, prior to amalgamation (e.g. Mitchell
et al. 2018). Amalgamation of a west-facing arc cannot easily be Our proposed evolution of central and western Myanmar implies
reconciled with the structural repetition of this arc and of the that migmatites in the Mogok Metamorphic Belt formed before
required post-113-Ma Andean arc to the east, implied by the late their emplacement onto the Mergui Group (Fig. 3) and their later
Cenozoic dextral offset of the Tagaung–Myitkyina Belt and Indo- intrusion by Cretaceous (128 Ma) diorite referred to above (Section
Burman Ranges on the Sagaing Fault. 2.a). A minimum age of Cretaceous for migmatites in the Scarps is
Granites of SE Asia’s Western Tin Belt (Fig. 7), the Inner supported by the 72 Ma age of the Nattaung granite (Mitchell et al.
Magmatic Arc of Barber et al. (2017), lie within the Slate Belt in 2012), replicated by Gardiner et al. (2018), and an early Palaeocene
the Shan Scarps, Tanintharyi and southwestern Thailand. minimum age is indicated by the 59 Ma Bilin Quarry dyke north of
Granite emplacement and mineralization were probably accompa- Kyaukse (Fig. 1) dated by Mitchell et al. (2012) and Searle et al.
nied by magmatism in the Popa–Loimye magmatic arc in its (2007). We note that at Kyitaukpauk in the Shante gold district
restored pre-middle Tertiary position west of the Tin Belt as argued (Mitchell et al. 1999) between Mogok and Mandalay, recent surface
by Mitchell & Garson (1981). The more than 400 formerly oper- and underground mapping have established that sulphide-rich tel-
ating tin and tungsten mines include Mawchi that in 1939 pro- lurium-bearing quartz-gold veins cut through the western limb of a
duced 8% of the world’s wolframite and more than half of regional synform in which sillimanite-bearing migmatites at least
Myanmar’s tin (Clegg, 1944). Recent isotopic dating has con- 400 m thick pass up through calc-silicates with marble, schist and
firmed the conclusion of Chhibber (1934b, p. 336) that the tin- bands of diopside-phlogopite rock into several hundred metres of
bearing granites, since shown to be predominantly peraluminous, spinel-bearing dolomite marble. Adularia (Tin Aung Myint et al.
reduced and fractionated, and commonly with two-phase textures 2014), vein textures, hydrothermal breccias and chalcedonic quartz
(Cobbing et al. 1992), are very largely latest Cretaceous to Eocene veinlets in the marble (Kyaw Min Htun & Myint Thein Htay, 2018;
(44–72 Ma) in age. There are few Cretaceous granites older than Mitchell, 2017, p. 243) indicate, and the high telluriium content
75 Ma (Aung Zaw Myint, pers. comm., 2020; Mao et al. 2020) suggests, that the Kyitaukpauk gold veins are low sulphidation epi-
in the Slate Belt and no granites in the 44–90 Ma age range east thermal. We note that the 21–68 Ma metamorphism reported by
of the belt. Searle et al. (2020) in the spinel-bearing marbles and syenites at
Proposed tectonic settings during granite emplacement include Mogok has not yet been recognized in the underlying migmatites
an Andean-type environment analogous to the Bolivian tin belt at Kyitaukpauk and on migmatites elsewhere in the Shan Scarps.
(Mitchell & Garson 1981; Gardiner et al. 2015). Li et al. (2019) con- These migmatites lack alkaline intrusions, host undeformed
sider that in Tanintharyi tin granites older than 110 Ma were Cretaceous–Eocene granites and, according to our proposed tec-
intruded during subduction of their Meso-Tethys (our Neo- tonic evolution, are probably pre-Mesozoic.
Tethys), while those 60 Ma and younger were emplaced during
subduction of their Neo-Tethys (our Indian Ocean). Other pos-
9. Conclusions
sible settings are summarized in Kyaw Thu Htun et al. (2019).
We suggest that emplacement of the granites in the Slate Belt Restoration of the long-proposed mid-Tertiary to present-day
and in the adjacent Mogok Metamorphic Belt, and mineralization c. 450 km dextral offset on the Sagaing Fault, together with our
of those in the Slate Belt, took place during uplift in the footwall of inferred early Permian emplacement of the Shan Plateau succes-
the Myittha Chaung extensional fault (Fig. 2) that forms the sion over the Slate Belt to form Sibumasu, allows the following con-
eastern boundary of the Slate Belt and the tin granites. Granite gen- clusions regarding western and central Myanmar’s tectonic
eration may have resulted from decompressional partial melting of evolution and mineralization since the Early Jurassic Epoch.
crust tectonically thickened during Cretaceous crustal shortening Within this interval, the Neo-Tethys progressively closed by
on the Pan Laung Thrust. The uplift could explain erosional W-wards subduction of the Sibumasu Plate beneath a detached
unroofing of the granites and their tin–tungsten mineralization ophiolite and, following reversal in tectonic polarity, by E-wards
within the Slate Belt window (Figs 8, 9). Extensional faulting subduction of remnant Neo-Tethys beneath ophiolite and
may have been a response to retreat of the Popa–Loimye arc Sibumasu, generating the 113–128-Ma Mondaung Arc and ending
and roll-back of the subducting slab as proposed for the granite with subduction of part of the Victoria–Katha Block. The subduc-
emplacement (Sanematsu et al. 2014; Jiang et al. 2017; Li et al. tion zone then jumped to the west and, since the Albian age, the
2019), while Popa–Loimye arc magmatism continued (Fig. 4). Indian Ocean has subducted E-wards under Myanmar generating
The tin granites, present in the Slate Belt from near Mondaung the Popa–Loimye arc. Following uplift of the Indo-Burman Ranges
to beyond the Thai border at latitude 10° N (Fig. 7), are distinct on the Sin Chaung extensional fault, western Myanmar, moving
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
1500 A Mitchell et al.
N-wards on the Sagaing Fault since the middle Oligocene Epoch, Barber AJ and Crow MJ (2009) Structure of Sumatra and its implications for
has collided with and overrode the Disang flysch in the Naga the tectonic assembly of Southeast Asia and the destruction of Palaeotethys.
Thrust Belt on the India margin. Island Arc 18, 3–20.
Mineral deposits related to these events include orogenic high- Barber AJ, Khin Zaw and Crow MJ (2017) The pre-Cenozoic tectonic evolu-
grade quartz-gold veins in the Modi Taung Gold District, possibly tion of Myanmar. In Myanmar Geology, Resources and Tectonics (eds AJ
Barber, K Zaw and MJ Crow), pp. 689–714. Geological Society of London,
generated during the inferred early Permian orogeny; gold-copper
Memoir no. 48.
skarns associated with Lower Cretaceous diorites of the Mondaung Barley ME, Pickard AL, Khin Zaw, Rak P and Doyle MG (2003) Jurassic to
arc in the Shan Scarps; the world’s most valuable jadeite veins at Miocene magmatism and metamorphism in the Mogok metamorphic belt
Tammaw and Nat Hmaw west of Hpakant, which we suggest and the India-Eurasia collision in Myanmar. Tectonics 22, 1–11.
resulted from expulsion of hydrothermal fluids from the sub- Bateson JH, Mitchell AHG and Clark DA (1972) Geological and Geochemical
ducting Victoria–Katha Block into overlying serpentinites and Reconnaissance of the Seikphyudaung-Padatgyaung Area of Central Burma.
their exhumation during folding of the subduction zone; tin and Overseas Division Report No. 25, Institute of Geological Sciences, HMSO,
tungsten deposits related to Upper Cretaceous – Eocene crustal London, 54 pp.
granites of Myanmar’s Western Tin Belt emplaced east of the Bender F (1983) Geology of Burma. Berlin: Borntraeger, 293 pp.
Popa–Loimye arc in its restored position and, we suggest, gener- Bleeck AWG (1908) Jadeite in the Kachin Hills, Upper Burma. Geological
ated in the footwall of a regional extensional fault; and high-grade Survey of India, Records 36, 254–85.
Brunnschweiler RO (1966) On the geology of the Indoburman Ranges. Journal
quartz-gold veins in the Mogok Metamorphic Belt’s Shante Gold
of the Geological Society, Australia 13, 137–94.
District, for which a low sulphidation epithermal origin and late Brunnschweiler RO (1970) Contributions to the post-Silurian geology of
Cenozoic age are strongly indicated by the vein textures, presence Burma (Northern Shan States and Karen State). Journal of the Geological
of adularia and associated hydrothermal breccias. The giant high- Society, Australia 17, 59–79.
sulphidation copper deposits and copper-gold prospects in the Cai F, Ding L and Yao W (2020) Late Triassic palaeogeographic reconstruction
Popa–Loimye arc are not discussed, because some exhaustive along the Neo-Tethyan ocean margins, southern Tibet and Myanmar. In
descriptions have recently been published elsewhere. GeoMyanmar 2020, Fourth International Congress on Geosciences of
Our reconstruction indicates that the Tengchong Block of Myanmar and Surrounding Regions Plus IGCP 668 & IGCP 679. 7–8
western Yunnan and NE Myanmar is the NE-wards continuation January 2020. Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences Society. Abstracts, p. 39.
of the Shan Scarps and that the Paung Laung–Mawchi Zone or so- Cai F, Ding L, Yao W, Laskowski AK, Xu Q, Zhang J and Kyaing Sein (2017)
called Medial Myanmar Suture Zone along the Shan Scarp is nei- Provenance and tectonic evolution of Lower Palaeozoic-Upper Mesozoic
strata from Sibumasu terrane, Myanmar. Gondwana Research 41, 326–66,
ther a suture nor a regional strike-slip fault, but a narrow basin
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2015.03.005.
between the Myittha Chaung extensional fault and the Late
Chhibber HL (1934a) The Mineral Resources of Burma. London: Macmillan,
Cretaceous Pan Laung Fault. 320 pp.
Chhibber HL (1934b) The Geology of Burma. London: Macmillan, 538 pp.
Acknowledgements. We thank two anonymous reviewers for many helpful Chit Thet Mon, Gong X, Wen Y, Jiang M, Chen QF, Zhang M, Hou G, Myo
comments and suggestions, and Professor Khin Zaw for valuable remarks, pro- Thant, Kyaing Sein and He Y (2020) Insight into major active faults in cen-
vision of alternative interpretations and additional reference suggestions con- tral Myanmar and the related geodynamic sources. Geophysical Research
cerning mineralization, leading to a much-improved manuscript. Aung Letters 47(8), https://doi.org10.1029/2019GL086236.
Minn Paing and Mavic Ulang drafted the figures. This research received no spe- Chu ZY, Wang W, Chen FK, Wang XL, Li XH and Ji JQ (2009) Os-Nd-Pb-Sr
cific grant from any funding agency or from any commercial or not-for-profit isotopic compositions of the Santaishan ultramafic rock in western Yunnan
groups. and its geological significances. Acta Petrol. Sinica 25, 3221–28 (in Chinese
with English abstract).
Clegg ELG (1944) Notes on Tin and Wolfram with a Description of the Tin and
Wolfram Deposits of India and Burma. Kolkata: Geological Survey of India,
References
Records 76, 120 p.
Aitchison JC, Aliba A, Bhowmik S, Clarke GL, Ireland TR, Kachovich S, Cobbing EJ, Pitfield PEJ, Derbyshire DPF and Mallick DIJ (1992) The
Lokho K, Stojanovic D, Roeder T, Truscott N, Zhen Y and Zhou R Granites of the Southeast Asian Tin Belt. London: British Geological
(2019) Tectonic evolution of the western margin of the Burma microplate Survey, HMSO, Overseas Memoir no. 10, 369 pp.
based on new fossil and radiometric age constraints. Tectonics 38(5), Curray JR, Moore DG, Lawver LA, Emmel FJ, Raitt RW, Henry M and
1718–41, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018TC005049. Kieckhefer R (1979) Tectonics of the Andaman Sea and Burma. In
Aung Kkin and Kyaw Win (1968) Preliminary studies of the palaeogeography Geological and Geophysical Investigations of Continental Margins (eds JS
of Burma during the Cenozoic. Union of Burma Journal of Science and Watkins, L Montadert and PW Dickerson), pp. 189–98. Tulsa: American
Technology 2, 53–81. Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir no. 29.
Aye Ko Aung (2020) A review of Palaeozoic stratigraphy in the western part of Deng J, Wang Q, Li G, Li C and Wang C (2014) Tethys tectonic evolution and
Southern Shan State, Myanmar. In Proceedings of GeoMyanmar 2020, Fourth its bearing on the distribution of imprtant mineral deposits in the Sanjiang
International Congress on Geosciences of Myanmar and Surrounding Regions region, SW China. Gondwana Research 26, 419–37.
Plus IGCP 668 & IGCP 679. 7–8 January 2020. Yangon: Myanmar Draut AE and Clift PD (2013) Differential preservation in the geological record
Geosciences Society. Abstracts, 4 pp. of intraoceanic arc and sedimentary processes. Earth Science Reviews 116,
Bandyopadhyay, D, van Hinsbergen DJJ, Plunder A, Bandyopadhyay PC, 57–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/.earscirev.2012.11.003.
Advokaat E, Chattopadhaya S, Morishita T and Ghosh B (2020) Dutt AB (1942) The Mineral Resources of the Shan Scarps Included in the
Andaman Ophiolite: an overview. In The Andaman Islands and Adjoining Kyaukse, Meiktila and Yamethin Districts and the Yengan State. Kolkata:
Offshore: Geology, Tectonics and Palaeoclimate (eds JS Ray and M Geological Survey of India, Records no. 77, 55 pp.
Radhakrishna). Society of Earth Scientist Series, Springer Nature Evans P (1964) The tectonic framework of Assam. Journal of the Geological
Switzerland AG, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39843-9. Society, India 5, 80–96.
Bannert D, Lyen AS and Than Htay (2011) The Geology of the Indoburman Gardiner NJ, Robb LJ and Searle MJ (2014) The metallogenic provinces of
Ranges in Myanmar. Hannover: Natural History Book Service, Myanmar. Transactions of the Institution of Mining & Metallurgy: B
Geologisches Jahrbuch, vol. B101, 101 pp. 123(1), 25–38, https://doi.org/10.1179/1743275814Y.0000000049.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
Arc reversal and block collision, Myanmar 1501
Gardiner NJ, Robb LJ, Morley CK, Searle MP, Cawood PA, Whitehouse MJ, in the Banmauk-Kawlin area. International Journal of Earth Sciences 109,
Kirkland CL, Roberts NMW and Tin Aung Myint (2016) The tectonic and 649–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-020-01824-w.
metallogic framework of Myanmar: a Tethyan mineral system. Ore Geology Licht A, Zaw Win, Westerweel J, Cogne N, Morley C, Chantraprasert S,
Reviews 79, 26–45. Poblete F, Ugrai T, Nelson B, Day Wa A and Dupont-Nivet G (2020)
Gardiner NJ, Searle MP, Morley CK, Robb LJ, Whitehouse MJ, Roberts Magmatic history of central Myanmar and implications for the evolution
NMW, Kirkland CL and Spencer CJ (2018) The crustal architecture of of the Burma Terrane. Gondwana Research 87, 303–19.
Myanmar imaged through zircon U-Pb, Lu-Hf and O isotopes: tectonic Lin TH, Mitchell AHG and Chung SL (2019) Early Cretaceous Mondaung-
and metallogenic implications. Gondwana Research 62, 27–60, https://doi. Lawa arc in Myanmar and its plausible correlation with Yunnan. In
org/10.1016/j.gr.2018.02.008. Goldschmidt 2019, Barcelona. 18–23 August 2019. Poster Presentation,
Gardiner NJ, Searle MP, Robb LJ and Morley CK (2015) Neo-Tethyan mag- Abstract.
matism and metallogeny in Myanmar: an Andean analogue? Journal of Asian Lin TH, Mitchell AHG, Chung S-L, Tan X-B, Tang JT, Thura Oo and Wu F-Y
Earth Sciences 106, 197–215; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.03.015. (2019) Two parallel magmatic belts with contrasting isotopic characteristics
Garson MS, Amos BJ and Mitchell AHG (1976) The Geology of the Country from southern Tibet to Myanmar: zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic constraints.
around Neyaungga and Ye-ngan, Southern Shan States, Burma, vol. 2. Journal of the Geological Society, London 176(3), 574, https://doi.org/10.
Nottingham: British Geological Survey, Institute of Geological Sciences, 1144/jgs2018-072
Overseas Division, Memoir, 72 pp. Liu CZ, Chung SL, Wu FY, Zhang C, Xu Y, Wang JG, Chen Y and Guo S
Goossens PJ (1978) The metallogenic provinces of Burma: their definition, geo- (2016) Tethyan suturing in Southeast Asia: zircon U-Pb and Hf-O isotopic
logic relationships and extension into China, India and Thailand. In Third constraints from Myanmar ophiolites. Geology 44, 311–14.
Regional Conference on Geology and Mineral Resources of Southeast Asia. Mao W, Zhong H, Yang J, Tang Y, Liu L, Fu Y, Zhang X, Kyaing Sein, Soe
Bangkok, Thailand. Myint Aung, Li J and Zhang L (2020) Combined zircon, molybdenite, and
Gramman F (1974) Some palaeontological data on the Triassic and Cretaceous cassiterite geochronology and cassiterite geochemistry of the Kuntabin tin-
of the western part of Burma (Arakan Islands, Arakan Yoma, western out- tungsten deposit in Myanmar. Economic Geology 115(3), 63–25, https://doi.
crops of Central Basin). Newsletter Stratigraphy 3, 272–90. org/10.5382/econgeo.4713.
Harlow GE and Sorensen SS (2005) Jade (nephrite and jadeite) and serpentin- Maung Maung, Aung Naing Thu and Suzuki H (2014) Latest Jurassic radio-
ite: metasomatic connections. International Geology Review 47, 113–46. larian fauna from the Chinghkran area, Myitkyina Township, Kachin State,
Harlow GE, Sorensen SS and Sisson VB (2007) Jade. In The Geology of Gem northern Myanmar. In GEOSEA 13, Regional Congress on Geology, Mineral
Deposits (ed A Lee), pp. 207–54. Quebec: Mineralogical Association of and Energy Resources of Southeast Asia, Abstracts (eds Win Swe, Soe Thura
Canada, Short Course Handbook Series 37. Tun, Myo Thant & Khin Zaw), pp. 38–39. Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences
Hobson GV (1941) Report on a geological survey in Part of Karenni and Society.
Southern Shan State. Geological Survey of India, Memoir 74, Part 2, 103–209. Metcalfe I (1984) Stratigraphy, palaeontology and palaeogeography of the
Hutchison CS (1973) Plutonic activity. In Geology of the Malay Peninsula (West Carboniferous of Southeast Asia. Memoires de la Society Geologue de
Malaysia and Singapore) (eds DJ Gobbett and CS Hutchison), pp. 215–52. France 147, 107–18.
New York: Wiley-Interscience. Metcalfe I (2013) Gondwana dispersion and Asian accretion: Tectonic and
Jiang H, Li WQ, Jiang SY, Wang H and We XP (2017) Geochronological, geo- palaeogeographic evolution of eastern Tethys. Journal of Asian Earth
chemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic constrains on the petrogenesis of late Sciences 66, 1–33.
Cretaceous A-type granites from the Sibumasu block, southern Myanmar. Mi Paik and Khin Zaw (2014) Age, petrology and geochemistry of granitoid
Lithos 268–271, 32–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2016.11.005. rocks in the Mawpalaw Taung area, Thanbyuzayat Township: constraints
Khin Zaw (2017) Overview of mineralisation styles and tectonic-metallogenic on their magma genesis and tectonic setting. In GEOSEA 13, Regional
setting in Myanmar, Chapter 24. In Myanmar Geology, Resources and Congress on Mineral and Energy Resources of Southeast Asia, Abstracts
Tectonics (eds AJ Barber, Khin Zaw and MJ Crow), pp. 582–83. (eds Win Swe, Soe Thura Tun, Myo Thant & Khin Zaw), pp. 54–5.
Geological Society of London, Memoir no. 48. Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences Society.
Kyaw Linn Zaw, Ohn Thwin, Travnor J and Thet Paing Kyaw Win (2020) Mitchell AHG (1977) Tectonic settings for emplacement of Southeast Asian tin
Origin and evolution of the ore-forming fluids in Shwesin Vein System, cen- granites. Geological Society of Malaysia Bulletin 9, 123–40.
tral Myanmar: constraints from structure, wall rock alteration and mineral Mitchell AHG (1979) Guides to Metal Provinces in the Central Himalayan
chemistry. In GeoMyanmar 2020, Fourth International Conference on Collision Belt; The Value of Regional Stratigraphic Correlations and
Geosciences of Myanmar and Surrounding Regions Plus IGCP 668 & IGCP Tectonic Analogies. Beijing: Geological Society of China Memoir no. 3,
679. 7–8 January 2020. Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences Society. Abstracts, 167–194.
p. 78. Mitchell AHG (1985) Collision-related fore-arc and back-arc evolution of the
Kyaw Min Htun and Myint Thein Htay (2018) High-grade epithermal veins in northern Sunda arc. Tectonophysics 116, 323–34.
the Kwin thonze District, Shante Gold Province, Mogok Metamorphic Belt, Mitchell AHG (1986) Mesozoic and Cenozoic regional tectonics and metallo-
central Myanmar. In GeoMyanmar 2018, Third International Congress on genesis in mainland SE Asia. In GEOSEA V Proceedings Vol. II. Geological
Geology, Resources, Geo-hazards of Myanmar and Surrounding Regions. Society of Malaysia Bulletin 20, 221–39.
Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences Society. Abstracts, p. 10. Mitchell AHG (1993) Cretaceous-Cenozoic tectonic events in the western
Kyaw Thu Htun, Yonezu K, Aung Zaw Myint, Tindell T and Watanabe K Myanmar (Burma) -Assam region. Journal of the Geological Society,
(2019) Ore mineralogy and fluid inclusion studies of the Tagu Sn-W deposit, London 150, 1089–102.
Myeik, Southern Myanmar. Minerals 9, 654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ Mitchell AHG (2017) Geological Belts, Plate Boundaries and Mineral Deposits
min9110654. in Myanmar. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 509 pp.
Lee H-Y, Chung S-L and Yang H-M (2016) Late Cenozoic volcanism in central Mitchell AHG, Ausa CA, Deiparine L, Tin Hlaing, Nyunt Htay and Aung
Myanmar: geochemical characteristics and geodynamic significance. Lithos Khine (2004) The Modi Taung-Nankwe gold district, Slate belt, central
245, 174–90. Myanmar: mesothermal veins in a Mesozoic orogen. Journal of Asian
Li J-X, Fan W-M, Zhang L-Y, Evans NJ, Sun Y-L, Ding L, Guan Q-Y, Peng T- Earth Sciences 23, 321–41.
P, Cai F-L and Kyaing Sein (2019) Geochronology, geochemistry and Sr- Mitchell AHG, Chung SL, Thura Oo, Lin TH and Hung CH (2012) Zircon U-
Nd-Hf isotopic compositions of Late Cretaceous-Eocene granites in southern Pb ages in Myanmar: metamorphic events and the closure of a Neo-Tethys
Myanmar: Petrogenetic, tectonic and metallogenic implications. Ore Geology ocean? Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 56, 1–23.
Reviews 112, 1–16. Mitchell AHG and Garson MS (1981) Mineral Deposits and Global Tectonic
Li JX, Fan WM, Zhang LY, Peng TP, Sun YL, Ding L, Cai FL and Kyaing Sein Settings. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 405 pp.
(2020) Prolonged Neo-Tethyan magmatic arc in Myanmar: evidence from Mitchell AHG, Tin Hlaing and Nyunt Htay (2010) The Chin Hills segment of
geochemistry and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes of Cretaceous mafic-felsic intrusions the Indo-Burman Ranges: not a simple accretionary wedge. In Indo-Myanmar
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
1502 A Mitchell et al.
Ranges in the Tectonic Framework of the Himalaya and Southeast Asia, Golden margin of Thailand and Myanmar. Proceedings of the Geologists’
Jubilee Volume (ed S Ibotomboi), pp. 3–24. Kolkata: Geological Society of Association 124, 994–1010.
India, Memoir no. 75. Sahni MR (1937) Discovery of Orbitolina-bearing rocks in Burma with a
Mitchell AHG , Myint Thein Htay and Kyaw Min Htun (2015) The Medial description of Orbitolina birmanica nov. sp. Geological Survey of India,
Myanmar Suture Zone and the western Myanmar-Mogok foreland. Journal Records 71(4), 360–75.
of the Myanmar Geosciences Society 6, 73–88. Sanematsu K, Manaka T and Khin Zaw (2014) Geochemical and geochrono-
Mitchell AHG, Myint Thein Htay and Kyaw Min Htun (2018) The Popa- logical charactersistics of granites and Sn-W-REE mineralisation in the
Loimye arc, its mineralisation and arc reversal. In GeoMyanmar 2018, Tanintharyi region, southern Myanmar. In Geosea 13, Regional Congress
Third International Congress on Geology, Resources, Geo-hazards of on Geology, Mineral and Energy Resources of Southeast Asia, Abstracts
Myanmar and Surrounding Regions. 31 January–2 February 2018. (eds S Win, ST Tun, M Thant and K Zaw), pp. 19–20. 10–11 March
Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences Society. Abstracts, 6 p. 2014. Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences Society.
Mitchell AHG, Kyaw Min Htun and Myint Thein Htay (2020a) Mondaung- Searle MP, Garber JM, Hacker BR, Kyi Htun, Gardiner NJ, Waters DJ and
Lawa and Popa-Loimye arcs and other belts, their mineral deposits and other Robb LJ (2020) Timing of syenite-charnockite magmatism and ruby and
settings. In GeoMyanmar 2020, Fourth International Congress on Geosciences sapphire metamorphism in the Mogok Valley region, Myanmar. Tectonics
of Myanmar and Surrounding Regions Plus IGCP 668 & IGCP 679. 7–8 39(3), https://doi.org/10.1029/2019TC005998.
January 2020. Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences Society. Abstracts, Searle MP, Morley CK, Waters DJ, Gardiner NJ, Kyi Htun, Than Than Nu
pp. 5–7. and Robb LJ (2017) Tectonic and metamorphic evolution of the Mogok
Mitchell AHG, Kyaw Min Htun, Myint Thein Htay and Lin T-H (2020b) Metamorphic and Jade Mines belts and ophiolitic terranes of Burma
Post-Triassic Myanmar west of the Salween: three crustal blocks, two arcs (Myanmar). In Myanmar: Geology, Resources and Tectonics (eds AJ
and the Mogok Metamorphic Belt. Journal of the Myanmar Geological Barber, Khin Zaw & MJ Crow), pp. 261–93. Geological Society of
Society 9, 71–84. London, Memoir no. 48, https://doi.org/10.1144/M48.12.
Mitchell AHG and McKerrow WS (1975) Analogous evolution of the Burma Searle MP, Noble SR, Cottle JM, Waters DJ, Mitchell AHG, Tin Hlaing and
orogen and the Scottish Caledonides. Geological Society of America Bulletin Horswood MSA (2007) Tectonic evolution of the Mogok Metamorphic belt,
86, 305–15. Burma (Myanmar) constrained by U-Th-Pb dating of metamorphic and
Mitchell AHG, Nyunt Htay, Ausa C, Deiparine L, Aung Khine and Sein Po magmatic rocks. Tectonics 26(3), https://doi.org/10.1029/2006TC002083.
(1999) Geological settings of gold districts in Myanmar. In PACRIM ‘99. Bali, Sevastjanova I, Hall R, Rittner M, Saw Mu Tha Lay Paw, Pubtin Kaing,
Indonesia. 10–13 October 1999. pp. 303–9. Alderton DH and Comfort G (2015) Myanmar and Asia united,
Mo XX, Lu FX and Shen SY (1993) Sanjian Tethyan Volcanism and Related Australia left behind long ago. Gondwana Research 32, 24–40.
Mineralisation. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 267 pp. (in Chinese Shi GH, Cui WY, Cao SM, Jiang N, Jian P, Liu DY, Miao LC and Chu BB
with English Abstract). (2008) Ion microprobe zircon U-Pb age and geochemistry of the Myanmar
Morley CK and Arboit F (2019) Dating the onset of motion on the Sagaing jadeitite. Journal of the Geological Society, London 165, 221–34.
Fault: evidence from detrital zircon and titanite U-Pb geochronology from Shi G, Lei W, He H, Yi Nok Ng, Liu Y, Yingzin L, Yuan Y, Kang Z and Xie G
the North Minwun Basin, Myanmar. Geology 47, 581–85, https://doi.org/ (2014) Superimposed tectonic-metamorphic episodes of Jurassic and Eocene
10.1130/G46321.1 age in the jadeite uplift, Myanmar, as revealed by 40Ar/39 Ar dating.
Myanmar Geosciences Society (2014) Geological Map of Myanmar (2014), Gondwana Research 26, 464–74.
1:2,250,000. Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences Society. Shi GH, Stockhert B and Cui WY (2005) Kosmochlor and chromian jadeite
Myint Myat Phyo , Wang HAO, Guillong M, Berger A, Franz L, Balmer WA aggregates from Myanmar. Mineralogical Magazine 69, 1059–75.
and Krzemnicki MS (2020) U-Pb dating of zircon and zirconlite inclusions Sloan RA, Elliott JR, Searle MP and Morley CK (2017) Active tectonics of
in marble-hosted gem-quality ruby and spinel from Mogok, Myanmar. Myanmar and the Andaman Sea. In Myanmar: Geology, Resources and
Minerals 10, 195, https://doi.org/10.3390/min10020195. Tectonics (eds AJ Barber, Khin Zaw and MJ Crow), pp. 19–52. Geological
Noetling F (1893) Note on the occurrence of jadeite in Upper Burma. Geological Society of London, Memoir no. 48, https://doi.org/10.1144/M48.2.
Survey of India, Records 26, 26–31. Stauffer PH (1974) Malaya and Southeast Asia in the pattern of continental
Pivnic DA, Nahm J, Tucker RS, Smith GO, Nyein K, Nyunt M and Maung drift. Geological Society of Malaysia Bulletin 7, 89–138.
PM (1998) Polyphase deformation in a fore-arc/back-arc basin, Salin Sub- Steckler MS, Akhter SH and Seeber L (2008) Collision of the Ganges-
basin, Myanmar (Burma). American Association of Petroleum Geologists Brahmaputra Delta with the Burma arc: implications for earthquake hazard.
Bulletin 82, 1837–56. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 273, 367–78.
Qiu ZL, Wu FY, Yang SF, Zhu M, Sun JF and Yang P (2009) Age and genesis Sutherland FL, Khin Zaw, Meffre S, Thompson J, Goemann K, Kyaw Thu,
of the Myanmar jadeite: constraints from U:Pb ages and Hf isotopes of zircon Than Than Nu, Zin MM and Harris SJ (2019) Diversity in ruby geochem-
inclusions. Chinese Science Bulletin 54, 658–68. istry and its inclusions: intra-and inter-continental comparisons from
Racey A (2017) Exploration history and petroleum geology of offshore Myanmar and Eastern Australia. Minerals 9, 28, https://doi.org/10.3390/
Myanmar. In Geological Belts, Plate Boundaries and Mineral Deposits in min9010028.
Myanmar (ed. AHG Mitchell), pp. 391–431. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Teza Kyaw, Suzuki H and Maung Maung (2020) Radiolarian ages of the That-
Rangin C, Maurin C and Masson F (2013) Combined effects of Eurasia/Sunda Tu bedded chert of Tagaung area with respect to the oceanic plate stratigra-
oblique convergence and East-Tibetan crustal flow on the active tectonics of phy. In GeoMyanmar 2020, Fourth International Congress on Geosciences of
Burma. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 76, 185–94. Myanmar and Surrounding Regions Plus IGCP 668 & IGCP 679. 7–8 January
Ridd MF (2016) Should Sibumasu be renamed Sibuma? The case for a discrete 2020. Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences Society. Abstracts, pp. 64–65.
Gondwana-derived block embracing western Myanmar, upper Peninsular Theobald W (1871) The Axial Group in western Prome, British Burma.
Thailand and NE Sumatra. Journal of the Geological Society, London 173, Geological Survey of India, Records 4, 33–34.
249–64. Thet Paing Kyaw Win, Hla Kyi and Kyaw Linn Zaw (2020) Petrological and
Ridd MF (2017) Karen-Tenasserim unit. In Myanmar Geology, Resources and geochronological characteristics of migmatites at Kyaikkhami-Setse
Tectonics (eds AJ Barber, Khin Zaw and MJ Crow), pp. 366–84. Geological Township, Mon State, Myanmar. In Geo-Myanmar 2020, Fourth lnterna-
Society of London, Memoir no. 48. tional Congress on Geosciences of Myanmar and Surrounding Regions Plus
Ridd MF, Crow MJ and Morley CK (2019) The role of strike-slip faulting in the IGCP 668 & IGCP 679. 7–8 January 2020. Yangon: Myanmar Geosciences
history of the Hukawng Block and the Jade Mines Uplift, Myanmar. Society. Abstracts, p. 77.
Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 130(2), 126–41, https://doi.org/ Thura Oo, Tin Hlaing and Nyunt Htay (2002) Permian of Myanmar. Journal
10.1016/j.pgeola.2019.01.002. of Asian Earth Sciences 20, 683–89.
Ridd MF and Watkinson I (2013) The Phuket-Slate belt terrane: tectonic evo- Tin Aung Myint, Than Than Nu and Min Aung (2014) Precious and base
lution and strike-slip emplacement of a major terrane on the Sundaland metal mineralisation in Kwinthonze-Nweyon area, Singu and Thabeikkyin
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066
Arc reversal and block collision, Myanmar 1503
Townships, Mandalay region, Myanmar. In Proceedings of Sundaland Yang H-M (2008) Late Cenozoic Volcanic Rocks from Burma: Geochemical
Resources 2014, MGEI Annual Convention. Palembang, Indonesia, pp. Characteristics and Petrogenesis. MSc thesis. National Taiwan University,
343–54. Taipei, 70p. (in Chinese). Published thesis.
United Nations (1978) Geology and Exploration Geochemistry of the Pinlebu- Yang JS, Xu ZQ, Duan XD, Li J, Xiong FH, Liu Z, Cai ZH and Li HQ (2012)
Banmauk area, Sagaing Division, northern Burma, Technical Report No. 2. Discovery of a Jurassic SSZ ophiolite in the Myitkyina region of Myanmar.
Geological Survey and Exploration Project, United Nations Development Acta Petrologica Sinica 28, 1710–30.
Programme, DP/UN/BUR-72-002, United Nations, New York, 69 pp. Yang L, Xiao W, Rahman MJJ, Windley BF, Schulman K, Ao S, Zhang J,
United Nations (1979a) Geology and Exploration Geochemistry of Part of the Chen Z, Hissain MS and Dong Y (2020) Indo-Burma passive amalgamation
Northern and Southern Chin Hills and Arakan Yoma, Western Burma, along the Kaladan Fault: insights from zircon provenance in the Chittagong-
Technical Report No. 4. Geological Survey and Exploration Project, Tripura Fold Belt (Bangladesh). Geological Society of America Bulletin
United Nations Development Programme, DP/UN/BUR-72-002, United 132(9–10), 1953–68, https://doi.org/10.1130/B35429.1.
Nations, New York, 59 pp. Ye Myint Swe, Cho Cho Aye and Khin Zaw (2017) Gold deposits of Myanmar.
United Nations (1979b) Mineral Exploration in Selected Areas, Burma, In Myanmar: Geology, Resources and Tectonics (eds AJ Barber, Khin Zaw and
Technical Report No. 6. Geological Survey and Exploration Project, MJ Crow), pp. 557–72. Geological Society of London, Memoir no. 48.
United Nations Development Programme, DP/UN/BUR-72-002, United Yui TZ, Fukoyama M, Liuzuka Y, Wu CM, Wu TW, Liou JG and Grove M
Nations, New York, 86 pp. (2013) Is Myanmar jadeite of Jurassic age? A result from incompletely recrys-
United Nations (1979c) Geology and Exploration Geochemistry of the Shan Scarps tallised inherited zircon. Lithos 160–161, 268–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
area, east of Kyaukse, Thazi and Tatkon, central Burma, Technical Report No. 3. lithos.2012.12.011.
Geological Survey and Exploration Project, United Nations Development Zhang JE, Xiao WJ, Windley B, Cai FL, Kyaing Sein and Naing S (2017) Early
Programme, DP/UN/BUR-72-002, United Nations, New York, 68 pp. Cretaceous wedge extrusion in the indo-Burma Range accretionary complex:
Wang C, Deng J, Carranza EJM and Santosh M (2014) Tin metallogenesis implications for the Mesozoic subduction of Neotethys in SE Asia.
associated with granitoids in the southwestern Sanjiang Tethyan Domain: International Journal of Earth Sciences 106, 1391–408.
nature, deposit types, and tectonic setting. Gondwana Research 26, 576–93. Zhang J, Xiao W, Windley BF, Wakabayashi J, Cai F, Kyaing Sein, Wu H and
Westerweel J, Roperch P, Licht A, Dupont-Nivet G, Zaw Win, Poblete F, Soe Naing (2018) Multiple alternating forearc and backarc-ward migration
Ruffet G, Hnin Hnin Swe, Myat Kai Thi and Day Wa Aung (2019) of magmatism in the Indo-Myanmar Orogenic Belt since the Jurassic: docu-
Burma Terrane part of the Trans-Tethyan arc during collision with India mentation of the orogenic architecture of eastern NeoTethys in SE Asia.
according to palaeomagnetic data. Nature Geoscience 12, 863–68, https:/ Earth Science Reviews 185, 704–31.
doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0443-2. Zhang J, Xjao W, Cai F and Kyaing Sein (2020) Wedge extrusion in the Indo-
Win Swe (1972) Strike-slip faulting in Central Belt of Burma. In Regional Burma Range accretionary complex and implication for orogenic architec-
Conference on the Geology of Southeast Asia, Abstracts (ed. NS Haile), ture of Neo-Tethys in SE Asia. In GeoMyanmar 2020, Fourth
p. 59. Geological Society of Malaysia, Newsletter no. 34. International Congress on Geosciences of Myanmar and Surrounding
Win Swe (1981) Tectonic evolution of the Western Ranges of Burma. Regions plus IGCP 668 & IGCP 679. 7–8 January 2020. Yangon: Myanmar
Contributions to Burmese Geology 1, 45–57. Geosciences Society. Abstracts, p. 46.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Yangon, on 02 Feb 2022 at 04:41:21, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000066