Unit 5 Lesson 9 Art Appreciation
Unit 5 Lesson 9 Art Appreciation
UNIT 5 LESSON 9
UNIT V
Lesson 9
Art and Anthropology: Cultural Relativism
Objectives:
Materials:
Module, tablet
Duration: 3 hours
AnthropologyCultural Relativism
A. Read the following articles as your reference and guide in answering the
subsequent questions and activities.
Fig 1. On
standard
of female
beauty
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
‘MURSI WOMAN’ -The plate on her lower lip determines her beauty and acceptance
in her society.
'PADAUNG WOMAN'-The long neck with spiral rings determines her beauty and
acceptance in the society
ART OF PLEASURE
The experience of pleasure (kama) is one of the four aims of Hindu life necessary for
a person to attain spiritual release (moksha).
Analysis
1. How can we apply cultural relativism in the perception of art and beauty?
( points)
To help us understand diversity, one should know the concept of cultural relativism.
It is the principle that a person’s beliefs and activities make sense in terms of his or
her own culture. Therefore, everything is relative including our concept of beauty.
Beauty and women’s bodies in Suri, Padaung and Chinese cultures have
distinct characteristics which define beauty and acceptance in their respective
society.
From warrior ethnic group in Kalinga, an art of tattooing has been mastered
the tradition of batok (the art of tattooing one’s body) by Apo Whang-Od.
She has been tattooing for 70 years. She has been visited for tattooing by the
locals, visitors, and even foreigners.
References:
Kottak, Conrad Phillip. (2011). Anthopology: Appreciating Cultural Diversity. 14th Ed.
University of Michigan. ISBN: 978-0-07-811698-8
Phil life (2018). Mambabatok: Tattoo Tradition in the Philippines. Retrieved on July
2020, from phillife.co/mambabatok-whang-od
Scupin, Raymund. (2012). Cultural Anthropology: A Global Perspective. 8th Ed. ISBN
978-0-205-15880-5
Videos:
APPENDIX 9.1-UNIT 5
Cultural Relativism
by Mark Glazer
The roots of cultural relativism go to the rejection of the comparative school of the nineteenth
century on the basis of exact and specific ethnological information. This information rejected the
comparative school’s methodology and as a result its evolutionary conclusions. Furthermore, as the
basis of cultural relativism is a scientific view of culture, it also rejects value judgments on cultures.
There is, in this view, no single scale of values which holds true for all cultures and by which all culture
can be judged. Beliefs, aesthetics, morals and other cultural items can only be judged through their
relevance to a given culture. For example, good and bad in are culture specific and can not be imposed
in cultural analysis. The reason for this view is, of course, that what is good in one culture may not be
bad in an other. This indicates that every culture determines its own ethical judgments to regulate the
proper behavior of its members. A result of this view is that it assumes that most individuals would
prefer to live in the culture in which they have been enculturated. It must be added to the discussion
above that the cultural in cultural relativism and historical particularism is about specific cultures and
not about a more abstract, singular and general concept of culture.
The reasoning behind all this comes from two distinct sources, one of them is the reaction to
the inaccuracies of the evolutionary schemes of the comparative school, the other the desire to study
culture from an objective value perspective. To be a scientific concept culture has to be studied as an
object without evaluative consideration. When we are not able to do that we no longer have a science
of culture. Some anthropologist associated with this point of view are France Boas and, his students,
Alfred Kroeber, Robert Lowie, Melville Herskovits, Ruth Benedict, Paul Radin, Margaret Mead, Ruth
Bunzel and many others. Franz Boas is the key theoretician in this group.
Boas published his views on the comparative method in 1896. The article, "The Limitations of
the Comparative Method of Anthropology," was the first exposition of cultural relativism. According to
the tenets of cultural relativism, there are no inferior or superior cultures; all cultures are equal. To
order cultures in an evolutionary scheme is unfeasible. All premises of good and bad and/or upper and
lower are culture bound and ethnocentric. Put that way, we can see that schemes of evolution are
ethnocentric not objective.
Here are four major limitations to the comparative method according to Boas:
1.It is impossible to account for similarity in all the types of culture by claiming that they are so because
of the unity of the human mind. 2. The existence like traits in different cultures is not as important as
the comparative school claims. 3. Similar traits may have developed for very different purposed in
differing cultures. 4. The view that cultural differences are of minor importance is baseless. The
differences between cultures are of major anthropological significance. Boas did not stop his critique of
the comparative school at that point he also delineated a methodology to replace it. His new method
emphasized the following: 1. Culture traits have to be studied in detail and within the cultural whole. 2.
The distribution of a culture trait within neighboring cultures should also be looked at. This suggest that
a culture needs to be analyzed within its full context.
Boas thought that this approach would help the anthropologist (1) to understand the
environmental factors that shape a culture, (2) to explain the psychological factors that frame the
culture, and (3) to explain the history of a local custom. Boas was trying to establish the inductive
method in anthropology and abandon the comparative method. Boas emphasized that the primary goal
of anthropology was to study individual societies and that generalizations could come only on the basis
of accumulated data. His importance within the discipline is that anthropology should be objective and
inductive science. In an age when the scientific method was important, this change in the discipline
resulted in the establishment of anthropology in universities. Boas’ students were among the first to
establish some of the most important anthropology programs on American campuses.
A point which must be added to the above discussion is that Boas attacked racism throughout
his career; he summarizes his views on racism in The Mind of Primitive Man (1911). According to Boas
the sweep of cultures, to be found in association with any sub species, is so extensive that there can be
no relationship between race and culture.
Following Boas and his emphasis on studying as many societies as possible, Alfred Kroeber, the
best known anthropologists of the period produced a good deal of ethnography. In his "Eighteen
Professions" (1915), which is a credo, Kroeber affirms some of the basic tenets of cultural relativism: (1)
all men are completely civilized, and (2) there are no higher and lower cultures. Much later in his career,
Kroeber makes three additional points on cultural relativism, 1)that science should begin with questions
and not with answers, 2)that science is a "dispassionate" endeavor which should not accept any
ideology, and 3)that sweeping generalizations are not compatible with science. Another major cultural
relativist of the period is Robert Lowie whose work is most significant among for cultural relativism.
Lowie probably came closer to Boas' views on the proper practice of anthropology than any
other anthropologist of his time. He was deeply rooted in the philosophy of science and accepted
cultural anthropology as a science. His views and criticism of theoreticians such as Morgan, are based
on this scientific world view. His critique of Morgan's evolutionary theory is based on epistemology.
Namely, that Morgan's evolutionary scheme of kinship had no proof. Furthermore, Morgan’s data was
often erroneous. One of the most important practitioners of cultural relativism was Ruth Benedict.
For Benedict cultural anthropology is the discipline that studies the differences between cultures.
This approach is fully Boasian in character. In this approach the plural "s" that was added to "culture"
by Boas and others, becomes crucial. The interest has now shifted from culture to cultures. The focus
has shifted to a particular culture and what happens to the individual in that culture.
Furthermore, a culture is integrated, and it is more than the sum of its parts. Every culture is different
from other culture. Benedict takes the Boasian program a step ahead. She does this through the
concept of cultural configurations or patterns.
Although her use of this approached is extremely reductionistic it represents a new direction in cultural
relativism by transcending the data collection of historical particularism and attempting to organize the
data in an explanatory manner.
The attempt to understand cultures at their own terms and the attempt to an objective
ethnography are the major accomplishments of cultural relativism. These have sometimes led to a lack
of theoretical depth and an undervaluation of the ethnographer’s own culture. However, the battle
against ethnocentrism and the objective view of cultures remain permanent contributions of cultural
relativism.
Mark Glazer
McAllen, Texas
Reference:
APPENDIX 9.2
Whang-od Oggay also known as Maria Oggay, is a Filipina tattoo artist from
Buscalan, Tinglayan, Kalinga, Philippines. She is often described as the "last" and oldest
mambabatok
For many years women have relied on beauty techniques to improve their
appearance. Before the age of lipsticks and eyeliners, there were ancient beauty techniques
women would adopt in pursuit of beauty.
In the Philippines, there is a tradition that has been practised by women for many
years. This is popularly referred to as “batok” meaning the art of tattooing your body with
tribal designs using bamboo stick and thorn.
Batok is believed to have been practiced for about one thousand years. Usually,
Filipino women who have reached the right age are allowed to get tribal designs to enhance
their beauty. But this art of beauty is not just left to women only. Men that have proved
themselves worthy enough to get the mark of beauty are allowed to participate in
mambabatok tradition.
Hence, you should not be surprised to find that the majority of men with these
ancient tattoos are Kalinga warriors or headhunters. Kalinga warriors have marks and
traditional designs that represent the battles they fought with their tribe’s enemies.
While batok is used to enhance the beauty of women, men that choose to decorate
their bodies with these ancient marks are seen as brave and courageous people in the
society. Therefore, a Kalinga warrior who is heavily marked with these ancient tattoos
commands a lot of respect and could make his enemies tremble in fear.
The people who put these ancient marks on the bodies of men and women are
referred to as mambabatoks. The main challenge facing this ancient practice is that the
original mambabatoks have died. That leaves the thousand-year-old practice in danger of
being lost forever.
The good news is that there is one mambabatok who is still alive and despite her old
age, she is still practicing this ancient art. Meet the legendary mambabatok from Kalinga,
Apo Whang-Od. For more than seventy years, Apo Whang-Od has been tattooing women
and headhunters in the region of Kalinga. This elderly woman was born in 1918 and is
considered to be the last mambabatok still living.
Whang-Od has tribal tattoos covering her chest and arms and it is her father who taught
her this ancient art of tattooing the body with ink and thorns. While she was
still young, Whang-Od used to tattoo her
friends including herself for practice.
However, some tattoos on her body were
done by her late father.
Whang-Od’s ancient marks feature Baybayinand tribal patterns. Her tattoos cover the
arms, back and chest and most of them symbolize bravery and nature like ferns, stars,
steps, rice bundles, centipedes and python scales.
Before she tattooing her guests, Whang-Od’s begins by removing her tattooing tools,
which includes a bamboo stick, orange thorn needle, a short stick, and a coconut mixing
bowl. Afterwards, she gets soot from her fireplace which she mixes with water to create ink
inside the coconut mixing bowl. She then dips a blade of grass into the ink to create a
pattern on your skin.
After drawing the pattern, Apo Whang-Od begins her tattooing session. She dips the
orange thorn needle into the ink and follows the pattern she drew before with a blade of
grass. This is done by using a short bamboo stick with the orange thorn needle.
She keeps following the same pattern until the whole ink is absorbed from the
needle. In case the tattoo design is small, it might take her half an hour to complete.
However, if the tattoo design is large, it might take between two to three hours to complete.
It is painful to prick your skin using a thorn so that you can get an ancient tattoo.
This is because the thorn is not smooth like a needle which adds to the amount of pain you
will experience. However, the overall benefit of beauty outweighs the pain you will
experience when you get a tattoo from mambabatok.
Reference:
Phil Life.(2018, April 24). Mambabatok: Tattoo tradition in the Philippines. Retrieved on
August 29, 2020 at https://www.phillife.co/mambabatok-whang-od/
APPENDIX 9.3
One specific form of body modification known is foot binding.This practice took place
in China from around the 10th century during the Song Dynasty and it continued for over
1000 years until it was made illegal in 1912. Young girls would have their feet bound to
make them smaller in order to portray a sense of beauty and membership to a higher class
of people. It originally began with a dancer that used to perform for the emperor and she
had bound her feet in the shape a half- moon to perform a specific dance on a giant lotus
flower. The emperor found this woman so beautiful that the other women in China wanted
their daughters to be beautiful like her and, in turn, bound their feet.
The practice started on young ladies who were between the ages of 5 and 7 years
old. Their parents or grandparents would soak their feet in an herbal mixture to prepare
them. When the young girls were ready, they would take their feet, then they would take
the four small toes, leaving the big toes alone, and wrap them under the foot, wrapping it
with a bandage. Then they would take the whole of the foot and fold it into an arch, and
wrap that with a bandage. It was extremely painful and the young girl would have a very
difficult time walking on her feet. But after a few years, the foot would become numb.
Every few days, every week, the foot would be unwrapped, washed, and wrapped
again even tighter, and the hope is that with the magic of time and pressure, the foot
would become as close to 3 inches as possible. What I have with me is a model of the
actual bound foot that we have in the Mütter Museum, and you can see how small it is that
it fits right in the palm of my hand. I also have a pair of very ornately-sewn shoes that were
made for adult women to wear. Okay, here's another pair right here. Again, small enough
to fit in the palm of my hand. The practice was outlawed in 1912, but it did continue in
some of the rural areas as late as the 1940s. There are a few elderly women left in China
who have their feet bound, but shortly it will truly become a thing of the past.
Reference:
Mütter Museum (2020). The History of Foot Binding in China. College of Physicians of
Philadelphia. Transcript retrieved on August 2020 at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5aeFRp7Qzg
LESSON 9-UNIT 5
ANSWER SHEET
2. How can we apply cultural relativism in the perception of art and beauty?
(10 points)
END OF LESSON 9
THANK YOU!