This document discusses the importance and process of weighting performance criteria for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) curriculum assessment and certification. Weighting performance criteria ensures critical criteria are given more importance during evaluation and helps standardize the development of assessment tools by allocating marks. The procedure involves ranking performance criteria based on factors like criticality, knowledge/performance, creativity required, and products/processes involved. Criteria are then distributed to theory and practical assessments based on level, with higher levels having more weight on practical assessment. An example shows weighting elements and criteria for the competency of performing lathe work at level 6.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100%(1)100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views9 pages
Performance Criteria Weighting
This document discusses the importance and process of weighting performance criteria for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) curriculum assessment and certification. Weighting performance criteria ensures critical criteria are given more importance during evaluation and helps standardize the development of assessment tools by allocating marks. The procedure involves ranking performance criteria based on factors like criticality, knowledge/performance, creativity required, and products/processes involved. Criteria are then distributed to theory and practical assessments based on level, with higher levels having more weight on practical assessment. An example shows weighting elements and criteria for the competency of performing lathe work at level 6.
• Weighting of performance criteria guides on evaluation of
specific observable standards by which candidate’s performance or products will be assessed based on their importance. • The observable standards are specific and measurable statements defining performance required to meet learning outcomes. IMPORTANCE OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA WEIGHTING
It ensures the critical Performance Criteria are given more
weight compared to those that are non critical.
It ensures standardization in development of assessment
tools i.e., allocation of marks to various performance criteria.
It guides on scoring the achievement of candidate against
performance criteria. FACTORS CONSIDERED IN PC RANKING
Critical or Non critical PC
Knowledge based PC or Performance based PC
Creativity level required to accomplish a task
Number of tasks involved in the PC
Whether the PC requires a Product or a Process
or both. PROCEDURE OF WEIGHTING PCS PROCEDURE OF WEIGHTING PCS CONT’D …….
Distribute the weight for each element to theory
and practical assessment using TVET CDACC weighting for each level. (See slide No. 7)
S/No. LEVEL THEORY PRACTICAL RATIO
1 6 50 50 1:1 2 5 40 60 2:3 3 4 30 70 3:7 4 3 20 80 1:4 PROCEDURE OF WEIGHTING PCS CONT’D ……. RANKING OF ELEMENTS THE PCs Factor of 3 THEORY PRACTICAL 1. Use personal protective equipment 1.5 2 6 3 3
2. Identify machine parts and their functions
3 4 12 6 6 3. Use a technical drawings to plan work operations 7 9 27 13.5 13.5 4. Calculate speed and feed rate 8 10 31 15.5 15.5 5. Setup machine tools 10 13 38 19 19 6. Mount work piece 10 13 38 19 19 7. Perform machining 12 15 46 23 23 8. Maintain of tools and equipment 4.5 6 17 8.5 8.5 9. Set up machine tool for specific job 10 13 38 19 19 10. Assess quality of machined parts 6 8 23 11.5 11.5 11.Maintain of machine tool 4.5 6 17 8.5 8.5 12. Perform housekeeping 1.5 2 6 3 3 78 100 300 150 150 Ratio: 1:1 PROCEDURE OF WEIGHTING PCS CONT’D ……. After weighting the elements you proceed to weight Performance criteria in each element using the factors mentioned in slide No. 4.