Differential Geometry Lecture 4: Tangent Spaces (Part 2) : David Lindemann
Differential Geometry Lecture 4: Tangent Spaces (Part 2) : David Lindemann
David Lindemann
University of Hamburg
Department of Mathematics
Analysis and Differential Geometry & RTG 1670
1. May 2020
∂
we can think of ∂x i p
as partial derivative at p with
respect to the chosen local coordinates (x 1 , . . . , x n )
alternative notations: ∂i |p , ∂x i |p
need to check the following:
Lemma
∂
∂x i p
is a well-defined tangent vector.
∂(f · g )
(p)
∂x i
∂((f · g ) ◦ ϕ−1 )
= (ϕ(p))
∂u i
∂((f ◦ ϕ ) · (g ◦ ϕ−1 ))
−1
= (ϕ(p))
∂u i
−1
∂(f ◦ ϕ ) ∂(g ◦ ϕ−1 )
= g (p) (ϕ(p)) + f (p) (ϕ(p))
∂u i ∂u i
∂f ∂g
= g (p) i (p) + f (p) i (p)
∂x ∂x
Example
∂x j
(p) = δij ∀1 ≤ i ≤ n, 1 ≤ j ≤ n,
∂x i
follows from (x j ◦ ϕ−1 )(u 1 , . . . , u n ) = u j .
Proof:
∂
Linear independence of the ∂x i p
:
assume ∃ (c 1 , . . . , c n ) ∈ Rn 6= 0, such that
n
X ∂
v0 := ci =0
i=1
∂x i p
as a linear map
then ∃ at least one 1 ≤ j ≤ n, such that c j 6= 0, and we
obtain
v0 (x j ) = c j 6= 0
which is a contradiction to v0 = 0
David Lindemann DG lecture 4 1. May 2020 6 / 16
Tangent vectors from local coordinates
n o
∂
Tp M = spanR ∂x i p
, 1≤i ≤n :
assume wlog ϕ(U) = Br (0) [after possibly shrinking U
and translating ϕ via constant vector −ϕ(p) ∈ Rn ]
for any g ∈ C ∞ (ϕ(U)) obtain using the fundamental
theorem of calculus and
Z1
∂g
gj (q) := (tq)dt ∀ q ∈ ϕ(U), 1 ≤ j ≤ n,
∂u j
0
the identity
n
X
g = g (0) + gj u j
j=1
(continuation of proof)
acting with ∂x∂ i p on both sides of above eqn. yields
∂f
fi (p) = (p) ∀1≤i ≤n
∂x i
for any v ∈ Tp M fixed get by using x i (p) = 0 for all
1 ≤ i ≤ n and the Leibniz rule
n
X ∂f
v (f ) = i
(p)v (x i )
i=1
∂x
hence
n
X ∂
v= v (x i )
,
i=1
∂x i p
n o
meaning that ∂x∂ i p , 1 ≤ i ≤ n spans Tp M as claimed
Immediate consequence:
Corollary
The dimensions of a smooth manifold M and its tangent
space Tp M coincide for all p ∈ M.
ci ∂
P
Question: How do the tangent vectors of the form ∂x i p
i
behave under a change of coordinates?
Definition
Let M be a smooth manifold of dimension m and N be a
smooth manifold of dimension n.
The differential at a point p ∈ M of a smooth function
f ∈ C ∞ (M) is defined as the linear map
dfp : Tp M → R, v 7→ v (f ).
Definition (continuation)
The differential at a point p ∈ M of a smooth map
F : M → N in given local coordinate systems
ϕ = (x 1 , . . . , x m ) on M and ψ = (y 1 , . . . , y n ) on N
covering p ∈ M and F (p) ∈ N, respectively, is defined as
the linear map
n
∂F j
∂ X ∂
dFp : Tp M → TF (p) N, →
7 (p) ,
∂x i p j=1
∂x i ∂y j F (p)
[ j = row, i = column ]
Lemma
Let M, N, P be smooth manifolds and F : M → N,
G : N → P, smooth maps. Then
for all p ∈ M.
d(G ◦ F )p (v )(f ) = v (f ◦ G ◦ F )
= dFp (v )(f ◦ G ) = dGF (p) (dFp (v ))(f ).
Example
For any local coordinate system ϕ = (x 1 , . . . , x n ) on M
covering p ∈ M, dϕp : Tp M → Tϕ(p) Rn ∼ = Rn is of the form
Lemma
For two local coordinate systems ϕ = (x 1 , . . . , x n ) and
ψ = (y 1 , . . . , y n ) with overlapping domain on M we obtain for
all p contained in the overlap the identity
n
∂y j
∂ X ∂
= (p) .
∂x i p j=1
∂x i ∂y j p
Proof:
For any f ∈ C ∞ (M), 1 ≤ i ≤ n, p in the overlap we calculate
END OF LECTURE 4
Next lecture:
smooth manifold analogue to inverse function theorem
more examples of smooth maps
submanifolds of smooth manifolds