Scribd
Upload
180 views2 pages

Culminating Activity Evaluation Rubric

This rubric evaluates a culminating senior project for Waipahu High School students. It assesses the project's quality, demonstration of the student's 20+ hours of work and research topic. It also evaluates the student's collaboration with their project advisor, and whether the project presented a learning challenge for the student and showed personal growth. The rubric uses a 4-point scale to rate sections on product quality, collaboration, and challenge/growth. An overall final score is calculated.

Uploaded by

Arnel Bugatan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
180 views2 pages

Culminating Activity Evaluation Rubric

This rubric evaluates a culminating senior project for Waipahu High School students. It assesses the project's quality, demonstration of the student's 20+ hours of work and research topic. It also evaluates the student's collaboration with their project advisor, and whether the project presented a learning challenge for the student and showed personal growth. The rubric uses a 4-point scale to rate sections on product quality, collaboration, and challenge/growth. An overall final score is calculated.

Uploaded by

Arnel Bugatan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Waipahu High School Senior Project

Culminating Activity Evaluation Rubric


Student Name:

On Campus Mentor Name:

On Campus Mentor Signature: Date:

To be accepted, a student’s culminating activity must demonstrate a clear connection to his/her


20+ project hours and the research topic.
Scoring: 4 = Exceeds (Superior effort, creativity, and quality is evident)
3 = Meets (A good amount of effort and thoughtfulness is evident)
2 = Approaching (Exhibits some creativity, effort, or thought went into completion of the
final product)
1 = Well Below (Exhibits a lack of effort or thought went into completion of the final
product)

Section I – Product Quality: Culminating activity clearly demonstrates a connection to the student’s 20+
project hours and research topic
4 3 2 1 N/A

Planning, management & Student demonstrates exceptional


follow-through organizational skill and focus
GLO #1: Self-Directed (Does final activity seem rushed or
Learner thoughtfully planned?)

Product is visually appealing and


Aesthetics
demonstrates a commitment to
GLO #4: Quality Producer
excellence (if applicable)

Student provides clear and


convincing evidence that the research
Rigorous and Relevant
is relevant to the area of interest. The
GLO #4: Quality Producer
depth and complexity of the project’s
scope is especially strong.

Section II – Collaboration: Student demonstrates ability to interact and communicate effectively with
people.
4 3 2 1 N/A
Clearly Some Unclear No N/A
With Project Advisor
GLO#4: Complex Thinker Project Advisor’s input is evident in
GLO#5: Effective the student’s culminating activity
Communicator
Section III – Challenge Component: Student’s final activity showed a personal
learning stretch and growth
4 3 2 1 N/A
Activity chosen was realistic,
Impact
thoughtful and demonstrated its
GLO #2: Community
impact to the student, the school,
Contributor
and/or the larger community
GLO #3: Complex Thinker
(Why this activity?)

• Demonstrated a high level of


Personal Growth challenge
GLO#1: Self Directed • Significant endeavor
Learner • New learning clearly evident
• Evidence of personal growth

Technology Effective and ethical use of


GLO #6: Effective and technology evident in the project as a
Ethical User of Technology whole (if applicable)

Final Score Minimum passing score requires no ratings below 3

Comments:

You might also like