0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views

Chapter 3 Multiple Particle Systems: 3.1 Settling of A Suspension of Particles (Slurry)

This document summarizes particle settling in multiple particle systems. It discusses hindered settling in suspensions and defines variables like effective viscosity and density. It also describes force balance equations for particle settling. Batch and continuous particle settling are examined. For batch settling, relationships between settling flux and concentration are defined. For continuous settling, thickener design considerations like feed, underflow and overflow rates are addressed. Critically loaded thickeners where feed concentration equals critical concentration are also outlined.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views

Chapter 3 Multiple Particle Systems: 3.1 Settling of A Suspension of Particles (Slurry)

This document summarizes particle settling in multiple particle systems. It discusses hindered settling in suspensions and defines variables like effective viscosity and density. It also describes force balance equations for particle settling. Batch and continuous particle settling are examined. For batch settling, relationships between settling flux and concentration are defined. For continuous settling, thickener design considerations like feed, underflow and overflow rates are addressed. Critically loaded thickeners where feed concentration equals critical concentration are also outlined.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Chapter 3 Multiple Particle Systems

3.1 Settling of a Suspension of Particles (slurry)


Hindered Settling
입자가 모여 있으면 서로의 영향이 침강에 미친다. 이를 간섭침강이라 한다.

Effective viscosity of suspension


μ
μ =
ε e f( )

Effective density of suspension


ε
ρ a ve = f+ (1- ) p

Force balance
   
           

     


    
 

Substituting  and 


     
                ≡    


Corrected terminal settling velocity


U p , U f : actual(interstitial) velocity of particles and fluid, respectively

U ps , U fs : superficial velocity

ε U ps = U p ( 1 - )

ε U fs = U f

ε where : voidage or void fraction

pa r ticle volu me
ε ∴1 - = = volu me con cen tr a tion of pa r ticles = c v
su spen sion volu me

∴ U ps and U fs: volume flux of particles and fluid


3 3
( ms ⋅ m flu3 id or pa r ticles = m flu
id or pa r ticles
2 )
m su spen sion m su spen sion ⋅ s

☞ U ps 와 U fs 는 superficial velocity임과 동시에 부피 flux 임!


3.2 Batch Settling
(1) Settling Flux as a Function of Suspension Concnetration
Because of no net flow
U ps + U fs = 0

ε U p( 1 - ) + U f = 0

ε ∴ U p( 1 - )+ [U p- U r el T ] = U p (1- )+ [U p- U T f( )] = 0

ε ∴ U p = U T 2f ( )

Richardson and Zaki(1954)


n
ε Up= UT

[ ( ) ]
0.27
4.8 - n x
where = 0.043 Ar 0.57 1 - 2.4
n - 2.4 D

      

  Archimedes number


Superficial solid velocity or volumetric solid flux(m/s)


2
ε U ps = U p ( 1 - ) = U T f( )( 1 - )
n
ε = U T (1- )

ε Settling flux curve ( U ps vs. C v( = 1 - ) ): Figure 2.1

(2) Sharp Interfaces in Sedimentation

Up1

C1

Uint C2

Up2

Material Balance over the interface


Since no mass accumulation at the interface
( U p1 - U in t ) C 1 = ( U p2 - U in t ) C 2

ε where C =1 - , solids fraction


U ps - U ps2
∴U in t =
1

C 1- C 2

Δ As C →0 ,
dU ps
U=
dC

where U: the velocity of layer of concentration C

Slope=velocity of layer of
concentration C4

Ups

Slope=Uint, 12

Slope=Uint, 23
C1=0 C4 C2 C3

Worked Example 2.2

(3) Batch Settling


Supplying all the informations for the design of a thickener

Type I Settling
Type II Settling

A descending layer or interface will only appear if it falls faster than and gets away from the more dilute layers
descending from above them...

Worked Example 2.3

Recommended web site :


http://www.aem.umn.edu/Solid-Liquid_Flows/video.html

(4) Relationship between the height-time curve and the flux plot
Height of AB interface vs. time
Interface between clear liquid and  at h and t
Velocity of interface or   , the velocity of the particles at the interface
   
    
 
The velocity at which a plane of concentration, c has risen a distance h from

the base is 

The velocity of the particles relative to the plane



  

The volume of the particles which have passed through the plane
The total volume of the particles in the test


          

 
 
∴  


* This gives   vs.  (batch flux plot)

Worked Example 2.1

3.3 Continuous Settling


(1) Settling of a Suspension in a Flowing Fluid
Thickener vs. Clarifier Figure 2.11
- Downward flow
ε Q(1- ) 2
ε U = + U f( )
ps A T

Total Flux Flux


solid due to due to
flux bulk flow settling

ε Define C v≡1 - , particle volume concentration

Figure 2.12:
Feed concentration, CF → Mean bottom section
concentration, CB

- Upward flow
ε - Q(1- ) 2
ε U = + U f( )
ps A T

Figure 2.13:

Feed concentration, CF → Mean top section


concentration, CT

(2) Real Thickener

Feed
F, CF
V, CV

CT

CB

Underflow
L, CL
Feed/ Under(down)flow/ up(over)flow:
F(CF) L(CL) V(CV)

Below feed
ε L(1- ) 2
ε U = + U f( )
ps A T

Above feed
ε - V(1- ) 2
ε U = + U f( )
ps A T

* Critical concentration: C cr it≡ C at U p, u pwa r d = 0

(3) Critically Loaded Thickener


C F = C cr it

∴ U p, u pwa r d = 0 , C B = C F , C T = C V = 0 and

FC F LC L
U ps, down flow = =
A A
(4) Underloaded Thickener
C F < C c r it

∴ U p, u pwa r d = 0 , C B < C F and C T = C V = 0

FC F LC L
U ps, downflow = =
A A
(5) Overloaded Thickener
C F > C c r it

FC F
∴ U p, u pwar d =
A
-U ps, downflow , C B = C F and C T > C V ≠ 0

LC L
U ps, down flow = A

2
ω * Centrifugal Sedimentation r instead of g
* When minimum total flux appears... ☞ Figure 2.18 and 2.19

Worked Example 2.4

You might also like