Saes A 012
Saes A 012
Contents
1 Scope ................................................................................................ 2
2 Conflicts and Deviations .................................................................... 2
3 References ........................................................................................ 2
4 Definitions and Abbreviations ............................................................ 4
5 Overview ........................................................................................... 8
6 Overall Process Design ..................................................................... 9
7 Water Treatment Unit ...................................................................... 12
8 Disposal Water Pumps.................................................................... 21
9 Material Selection and Corrosion Control ........................................ 21
10 Groundwater Conservation ............................................................. 22
11 New Technology Applications, Testing and Deployment ................ 23
12 De-Bottlenecking of Existing Produced Water Treatment Units ...... 24
Revision Summary ................................................................................. 25
Appendix I - Simplified Schematic of Produced Water Treatment
and Disposal Unit in a GOSP without Crude Stabilization Facility .. 26
Appendix II - Simplified Schematic of Produced Water Treatment
and Disposal Unit in a GOSP with Crude Stabilization Facility ....... 27
Appendix III - Treated Produced Quality for Marine Disposal
(as per SAES-A-103) ...................................................................... 28
Appendix IV - Typical Removal Efficiencies for Selected Produced
Water Treatment Technologies ....................................................... 29
Appendix V - Typical Decision Process for Technology
Identification/Selection .................................................................... 30
Appendix VI - Industry Information for State of the Art Online
Oil in Water Analyzers ...................................................................... 33
Appendix VII - Parameters to Select Wash Water Conservation
Technologies ................................................................................... 34
Appendix VIII – Ground Water Conservation Process Schematic
Example .......................................................................................... 36
1 Scope
1.1 This Standard provides the minimum mandatory requirement for process design
of a grass root produced water treatment and disposal units at Gas Oil
Separation Plant (GOSP) in Saudi Aramco.
1.2 The standard also provides the minimum requirement for debottlenecking the
process design of an existing produced water treatment and disposal units.
1.3 Exclusions:
● This Standard does not apply to wastewater generated as a result of activities
governed by SAEP-327.
● This Standard does not apply to wastewater, sanitary and oily waste sludge
streams regulated by SAES-A-104.
● This Standard does not apply to wastewater that is regulated under
SAES-A-400, SAES-A-401, SAES-A-403 and SAES-S-020.
3 References
All referenced Specifications, standards, Codes, Forms, Drawings and similar material
shall be considered part of this standard and shall be the latest issue (including all
revisions, addenda and supplements unless stated otherwise).
NACE Standards
NACE MR0175/ISO15156 Materials for Use in H2S Containing
Environments in Oil and Gas Production
4.1 Definitions
Dissolved Oil: It is the portion of total oil that is not removed by filtration.
Dissolved oil can be removed by biological treatment, chemical oxidation or
activated carbon adsorption.
Formation Water: Water produced from Reservoir with Oil and Gas production.
Oil & Grease: It is the measure of total of dissolved and suspended “oil”
fractions extracted from produced water sample by an organic solvent.
Overfilling Time: The duration required to fill up the vessel if all outgoing flow
cuts off and High High Water Level shutdown fails. It is calculated as volume
between High High Water Level shutdown and vessel top divided by total
incoming volumetric flow.
PPM: (Parts per Million) When used in the context of water contaminant, it is
on weight basis and is sometimes interchangeably written as ppmw or mg/L.
Produced Water: Water produced from Reservoir with Oil and Gas production.
Suspended Oil: It is the amount of total oil that can be removed by filtration.
Suspended oil is total of free oil (already separated oil) and emulsified oil (yet to
be separated). A portion of the suspended oil is removed by physical separation
in produced water treatment units.
Silt Density Index: Silt Density Index (SDI, standardized filtration method with
0.45 microns filter, broadly used in RO systems to determine the pre-treatment
quality). This parameter is measured at process temperature (device directly
connected to sampling point), which avoids the interference of the 'Cloud Point'
of the organic matter or inorganic precipitation or oxidation by air dissolution.
Total Solids: It is the term for the residue after evaporation of a sample and its
subsequent drying in an oven at 103-105 °C (217-221 ºF). Total solids include total
suspended solids and total dissolved solids (organic and inorganic) and are reported
in units of ppm or mg/L.
Toxic Compounds: Toxic compounds are those specific chemicals that have
been shown to cause death or adverse effects to organisms at certain
concentrations.
Water Retention Time: Time defined as volume between vessel bottom and
NIL divided by water actual volumetric flow
WOSEP: Water Oil Separator. Oily water separator to collect and treat
separated water mainly from the three-phase separators and dehydrator in order
to remove the entrained oil before disposal.
4.2 Abbreviations
API: American Petroleum Institute
BAT: Best Available Technology
BOD: Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand
BPD: Barrels Per Day
BS&W: Basic (Bottom) Sediments and Water
BTEX: Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene
CDS: Closed Drain System
CFD: Computational Fluid Dynamics
CFU: Compact Floatation Unit or Cyclonic Floatation Unit
CM: Ceramic Membrane module
CML: Computer Model Library
5 Overview
5.1 Produced water is the largest byproduct stream associated with oil and gas
production from GOSPs. It generally includes:
Water separated in Oil and Gas Separators
Water separated in Dehydrator/Desalters
Wash water used in Desalting
Recovered water from closed drain system
Water separated in Oil and Gas Separators
5.3 The produced water is mainly Oil and TSS contaminated water. The removal of
high concentrations of these contaminants mainly happens in the upstream oil
treatment processes, like three-phase separators, degassing tanks,
dehydrators/desalters, etc.
5.4 For managing produced water in the oil field, the following options are
generally considered:
5.4.1 Prevent water production from oil field – Using water shut-off techniques,
e.g., injection of polymer gels to block water contributing fissures or
fractures in the reservoir or installing Downhole Water Separators to
separate water from oil or gas production streams in the Downhole and re-
injecting it back to formations. Any such measures must be approved by
Production Engineering.
5.4.2 Dispose or inject produced water – Treat and Inject the produced water
into the same formation or another suitable formation
5.4.3 Discharge produced water – Treat the produced water for direct sea
disposal meeting offshore discharge regulations, requirements of SAES-A-
103, EPD and LPD.
5.4.4 Reuse in oil and gas operations – Treat the produced water to use it for:
desalter wash water, drilling, stimulation, and work over operations.
5.4.5 Consume in beneficial use – Treat to meet the quality required for
beneficial uses such as: irrigation, land-restoration, floor washing, etc. in
accordance with SAES-A-104 requirements.
5.4.6 This water even though treated shall not be used for consumption and
potable or drinking water, or as utility water for humans and animals.
5.5 This standard is applicable to items 5.4.2, 5.4.3 and 5.4.4 above.
6.1 In accordance with FEL Manual, the GOSP design shall progress through
Process Study (FEL-2 Study), DBSP Development (FEL-2 DBSP), Project
Proposal (FEL-3 Project Proposal) followed by Detailed Design and
Construction (Project Execution).
6.2 The design of produced water treatment and disposal units should be viewed as
any other process technology where-in proper process design data is needed to
meet target treated water requirements in cost effective ways. The following
key data is required to conduct process design of produced water treatment
system:
Crude/Gas/Water production forecast
Geo-chemical analysis of formation water and desalter wash water
The destination of produced water disposal (Disposal or pressure maintenance)
The above data to develop produced water treatment and disposal unit design
during the various project phases shall be provided as per Section 6.2 of SAES-
A-010 unless otherwise noted.
6.3 Simulations
6.3.1 Produced water treatment and disposal flow sheet shall form the part of
Steady State Process simulation model for the GOSP.
6.3.2 Steady State Simulation shall be developed during DBSP (FEL-2) and
updated during project Proposal (FEL-3) and Detail Design phase by
Design Contractor and shall be based on the latest version of approved
simulation software package based on SAEP-364. The process
simulation software package that will be used in the project shall be
concurred by P&CSD.
6.3.3 Produced water treatment and disposal simulations shall be carried out
for summer and winter case at Initial Water Cut, Intermediate Water
Cut (Optional) and Design Water Cut.
6.4 PFDs
6.4.1 PFDs showing Heat & Material Balance for Summer and Winter
conditions of produced water treatment and disposal units shall be
developed for the following cases:
6.4.2 Stream data table for Summer, Winter conditions for Initial Water Cut,
Intermediate Water Cut (optional) and Design Water Cut case shall be
provided in the PFDs.
6.5 P&IDs
Figure 6.1
e) Level Gauge- Type of Level Gauge, backlighting requirement
6.5.3 The turndown of produced water treatment and disposal units shall be
considered in accordance with the turndown of each individual
equipment.
6.5.4 All produced water treatment and disposal units shall be designed for
Wet Sour Service for potential souring of the production field during
the life cycle unless data provided by RMD can confirm otherwise.
6.5.5 In accordance with Section 6.8 of SAES-A-010, each main process line
within the GOSP battery limit shall be provided with flowmeter in
order to carry-out the overall plant mass balance in accordance with
SAEP-83.
7.1 Produced water treatment units can be designed either as primary or secondary
water treatment in accordance with Appendix IV.
7.2 The following influent water data shall be used for Produced Water Treatment
design:
Oil and Grease, normal/maximum: 1000 ppm/ 2500 ppm
TSS, normal/maximum: 1000 ppm/ 2500 ppm
Note: The need to use different influent water design data shall be evaluated and
concurred by P&CSD.
7.3. The required quality of treated produced water for injection and disposal into
reservoir shall be specified by RMD/P&FDD. In the absence of such
information, the treated produced water shall contain no more than 100 mg/l of
oil and grease.
7.4 The quality of treated produced water for the marine disposal shall conform to
environmental standard SAES-A-103. Refer to Appendix III.
7.4.1 As the water cut increases for the mature offshore fields, the treatment
of produced water at offshore GOSPs and discharge of treated water to
sea is sometimes considered to offload the production pipelines and
eliminate the debottlenecking of onshore GOSPs. For this option, the
water treatment systems shall be designed to remove toxins to a level
lower of the Industry and Saudi Aramco Standards.
7.5 The quality of treated produced water for Desalting Purpose Reuse shall be
specified in accordance with requirements of Section 9 of this standard.
7.6 The typical removal potentials for selected produced water treatment
technologies are shown in the Appendix IV. The information contained in the
Appendix IV shall be used as guideline only since actual removal efficiencies
depend on several factors like:
influent quality variability
flow variability
upstream droplet shearing
impact of chemicals on emulsion tightness
oil quality (light, medium, heavy, extra light)
fluid temperature
equipment design.
7.7 The selection of produced water treatment technology shall follow the decision
steps stated in the Appendix V.
7.9 High efficiency mixing devices shall be used when chemical injection is applied
in the water treatment process. Emergency eye wash and showers shall be
provided close to chemical injection skids. Refer to SAES-B-069.
7.10 The state of art online oil-in-water analyzer shall be used in the inlet/outlet of
the process for trending purpose. Refer to Appendix VI.
7.11 When primary water treatment is enough for achieving the target treated water
quality, either WOSEP or CPI separator design shall be selected.
7.12 WOSEP and CPI separator are horizontal cylindrical gravity separator designed
in accordance with SAES-D-001.
7.13 The choice between WOSEP or CPI separator shall be based either on the
criteria mentioned in Appendix IV and Appendix V.
7.14 WOSEP
7.14.1 The bulk liquid shall move horizontally inside WOSEP with near-
laminar flow regime and horizontal velocity of the influent water
inside the vessel shall not exceed 3 ft/min.
7.14.2 WOSEP shall be designed with internal split flow arrangement with
feed from the center of the vessel and oil collection compartments on
both ends of the separator (see example in Figure 7.1).
Figure 7.1
7.14.3 WOSEP shall be designed to separate oil droplets of 150 microns and
larger at Normal Water Level from the water continuous phase and
have minimum 10 minutes water retention time (as defined in Figure
7.2).
Figure 7.2
7.14.4 The inlet nozzle shall be fitted with flow distributor to cover the central
oil separation compartment. The elevation of inlet nozzle shall be such
that it prevents the turbulence of solids settled at the bottom and oil
accumulated on the liquid surface.
7.14.6 The water outlet nozzle shall be provided with vortex breaker.
7.14.7 Sludge/solids jetting manifold, solids drain nozzles and water jetting
nozzles shall be provided at the bottom of the separator to remove the
settled solids on regular basis.
7.14.8 Anti-wave breaker baffles shall be provided across the vessel to avoid
turbulence in the central compartment of the vessel.
7.14.9 All WOSEP shall be equipped with suitable supports and provisions
shall be provided for future coalescing pack.
7.14.10 The separated oil collected in the oil compartment shall be routed to a
recovered oil drum or recycled back to upstream oil processing
equipment.
7.14.11 All WOSEP’s internals shall be removable and pass through manways.
7.14.12 The treated water from each ends of the vessel shall be connected to
suction header of the disposal pumps and onwards to water
injection/disposal wells.
7.14.13 One vessel diameter on both sides of the water inlet nozzle shall not be
accounted for the gravity separation due to turbulence at the inlet of
separator.
7.14.14 CFD shall be performed on each Water Oil Separator during Detailed
Design by vessel’s internals supplier in order to confirm design of
vessel’s internals (e.g. inlet device, anti-wave baffles, mist eliminator,
etc.).
7.14.15 The operating pressure of WOSEPs shall be such that the bulk of the
water separated from the production traps and dehydrator shall flow by
pressure difference; this is to avoid the pumps which cause shearing of
oil/TSS particles and affect the separation efficiency of the API
separator.
7.14.16 WOSEP shall be blanketed with fuel gas to prevent oxygen entry into
produced water. The presence of oxygen causes corrosive environment
as well as corrosion products which affect the separation performance.
7.15.2 CPI separator is also gravity separator like WOSEP, but it contains
pack of plates as internals. The flow of influent water takes place
between the plates. The plates reduce the travel distance for the oil
droplets to separate from water phase. The plates also reduce the
turbulence and enhance coalescence of the oil droplets into larger ones
that separate easier.
7.15.3 CPI separators shall be preferred over WOSEP when the influent water
contains tighter emulsions and when the treated water quality is
reliably required to be < 50 ppm OIW.
7.15.4 CPI separator can remove oil droplets larger than 60 microns compared
to the 150 microns removable by API separator.
7.16.1 When primary produced water treatment alone is not enough for
achieving the target treated water quality for disposal into reservoir,
secondary water treatment technology shall be added in series with
primary water treatment (the downstream of WOSEP / CPI separator)
for reliably achieving the required stringent treated water quality.
Liquid/Liquid Hydrocyclone, IGF or Media filters are the examples of
secondary treatment technologies.
7.16.3 When the target water quality requires oil contents below < 20 ppm,
secondary water treatment technology shall be applied in series with
the primary water treatment.
7.18.2 IGF/DGF use gas bubbles to remove oil droplets and suspended solids
not removed by primary water treatment.
7.18.3 In IGF vessel, the gas bubbles are introduced in the system by driving
it into influent stream either by impeller or by eductor. The gas
bubbles capture oil and suspended solids while rising to the surface.
The oily froth is removed by the skimmer and is recycled to oil treating
units.
7.18.5 The recovered oil stream shall be controlled so that it does not exceed
4% of influent water. This is for restricting water contents in the
recovered oil. The water content in the recovered oil stream shall not
be above 30%.
7.18.7 DGF differs from IGF by the method used to generate gas bubbles and
the resultant bubble sizes. In DGF units, the gas is dissolved in the slip
stream by applying pressure and is fed into the flotation chamber,
where gas is released in bubble form as the pressure is reduced.
7.18.8 Like primary water treatment technology, the efficiency of the gas
flotation process depends on: temperature. The oil-water separation
efficiencies depend upon the particle size distribution, specific
gravities of oil and solids, the specific gravity and viscosities of the
produced water, the degree of emulsification of oil and the amount of
soluble organic present in the influent water.
7.18.9 Minimizing gas bubble size and achieving an even gas bubble
distribution enhances the removal efficiency. Gas bubble attachment
to oil can be enhanced by 1-10 ppm chemical addition. The higher
salinity of water assists in smaller bubble size generation. Median
bubble size of 50-60 microns is attempted to achieve desired floatation.
Bubble size in IGF units is seen to be
100-1000 microns and in DGF units, it 10-100 microns. Around 20-
50% water is recirculated for contacting with gas.
7.18.11 Streams with an expected oil droplet size of 2-5 microns cannot
undergo flotation.
7.19.1 Media Filtration is used to remove suspended oil and solids that are not
removed by primary treatment processes. Refer to Appendix IV for
the selection criteria of Media Filtration.
7.19.4 Nutshell filters are special type of media filter made from ground
walnut shells and sometimes a combination of walnut and pecan shells.
The nutshells are better than sand or anthracite for oil removal since
they are preferentially water wetted and thus readily adsorb and desorb
oil. Nutshells are cleaned by backwashing with the influent water;
whereas sand filters require large amount of clean water for
backwashing.
8.1 The treated water from the last produced water treatment unit (primary or
secondary, as the case may be) shall be pumped by the Disposal water pumps
and onwards to the disposal wells. The disposal pumps designed in accordance
with SAES-G-005.
8.2 These are high pressure pumps required to overcome the disposal/injection well
head pressure. Therefore, a combination booster and injection pumps or multi-
stage pump shall be considered.
8.3 Since the disposal water increases over the life cycle of the GOSP, the provision
shall be kept to add the required number of pumps in staged manner instead of
designing the pumps for ultimate disposal water capacity. One spare water
disposal pump shall be provided (n+1 sparing philosophy).
8.4 Separate pumps shall be provided for the produced water injection and the
power water (aquifer water) injection systems.
9.1 Material selection and corrosion control for produced water treatment units shall
be performed in accordance with SAES-L-132 and SAES-L-133.
9.2 Corrosion inhibitor dosage rates and injection locations shall be finalized in
consultation with CSD and Producing Department Corrosion Engineers. Refer to
SABP-A-018 and Refer to SABP-A-036.
9.3 Corrosion inhibitors for produced water treatment units shall be evaluated and
selected as per SAES-S-205 requirements.
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use
Page 21 of 36
Document Responsibility: Process Engineering Standards Committee SAES-A-012
Issue Date: 12 April 2018 Process Design Criteria for Produced
Next Planned Update: 12 April 2021 Water Treatment and Disposal
9.4 The need for Biocide and Oxygen Scavenger injection systems shall be
evaluated during Design Basis Scoping Paper (FEL-2) and Project Proposal.
9.5 The chemical dosing pumps shall be positive displacement, metering type
capable of adjusting the dosage rates both locally and remotely from the control
system. Pumps shall be equipped with pulsation dampener and pump rate shall
be confirmed by graduated cylinder installed on the pump suction. Refer to
SABP-A-015.
9.6 Coupon and on-line corrosion monitoring system, meeting the requirements of
01-SAMSS-023 shall be provided in produced water treatment units to monitor
corrosion. The locations for corrosion monitoring access fittings shall be
reviewed by CSD and Producing Department Corrosion Engineers. Refer to
SABP-A-018 and SABP-A-036.
9.7 Required space shall be provided for on-line coupon retrieval and installation
tools. Refer to SABP-A-018 and SABP-A-036.
9.8 Anode Monitoring System (AMS) and cathodic protection with sacrificial
anodes shall be finalized in consultation with CSD and Producing Department
Corrosion Engineers.
9.9 The need for online oxygen analyzer for produced water streams shall be
evaluated during Design Basis Scoping Paper (FEL-2) and Project Proposal
(FEL-3). Online oxygen analyzer shall be designed in accordance with SAES-J-
510.
9.10 Coating for produced water treatment units shall be in accordance with SAES-
H-001 and SAES-H-002 requirements.
10 Groundwater Conservation
10.2 The major groundwater consumers in GOSPs are desalter wash water and
injection for reservoir pressure maintenance. Alternative sources of water shall
be utilized to eliminate or minimize the use of groundwater for these
applications.
10.3 The demand for wash water shall be optimized based on salt and water balance
around crude oil desalting system.
10.4 The necessary design measures and operations procedures shall be provided to
continuously monitor and control the use of groundwater for crude oil desalting
in the GOSPs.
10.5 Alternative in-plant sources of wash water for crude oil desalting shall be
developed for minimizing or eliminating the use of groundwater in GOSPs.
These alternatives can be one or a combination of the following options: desalter
effluent water, produced water, seawater, boiler blowdown, and wastewater (see
example in Appendix VIII).
10.6 Appendix VII shows the parameters that shall be used for identifying and
evaluating technologies for ground water / wash water conservation by using
produced water or desalter effluent water as feed stream.
10.7 The evaluation of new technology for the generation of equivalent wash water
quality shall include the following parameters:
Wash water quality (TDS, pH, bacterial count etc.) shall at the minimum
meet the design wash water quality available at the GOSP site. Any
deviation from the incumbent wash water quality can only be accommodated
if there is no impact on the existing wash water system. A new salt balance
shall be conducted to evaluate the impact.
10.8 The selected technologies for ground water conservation shall be concurred with
P&CSD.
11.1 Following new technologies are being developed in Saudi Aramco for the
produced water treatment. These technologies shall be evaluated before
considering for the deployment.
De-Oiling
− Absorption (organoclay)
− Walnut Shell Media Filtration
− Membrane Separation (ceramic, cross-flow, hollow fiber, vibrating)
11.2 Field Testing of new technology shall be carried out before deploying it in
commercial scale at Saudi Aramco facilities.
11.3 When field testing of already proven and globally deployed technologies is
waived, the original equipment manufacturer’s (OEM’s) performance guarantee
and physical performance verifications at similar worldwide facilities are
necessary.
12.1 Most of the existing GOSPs have only primary water treatment units (API/CPI
separators), but at some GOSPs, IGF and CFUs are lately installed. These are
not operational due to hydraulic limitations, low water flow rates. The capacity
of produced water treatment units shall be tested whenever:
The crude production is stepped up
Many new wells have been opened
Water cut has increased sharply
Chemical injection has increased significantly
Revision Summary
24 January 2013 New Saudi Aramco Engineering Standard.
1 January 2018 Editorial revision to modify paragraph 6.9.2.
28 March 2018 Major 5-year cycle revision
12 April 2018 A new section about groundwater conservation requirements for crude desalting
purpose will be added to SAES-A-012.
Appendix III - Treated Produced Quality for Marine Disposal (As per SAES-A-103)
No
No
Yes
CPI separator
WOSEP Required
Required
Yes No Hydrocyclone
DGF and Media Is the oil Is the oil and IGF is
Filtration Required limit < 20 limit < 25 required
ppm? ppm?
Yes
Chemical
No
Flocculent Is the oil
Injection + limit < 10
Hydrocyclone + ppm?
CFU Required
Yes
Chemical Flocculent
Injection + Yes Is the Oil No
Hydrocyclone + CFU Limit
+ Diatomaecious earth <1ppm?
filters OR Ceramic
Membranes Required
Notes:
1. Yes/No decisions may not be absolute. They are meant to provide rough-order of magnitude decision.
2. If technology vendor challenges the technology decision, it has to further discussed backed by the
performance verification.
3. Some removal of TSS will always happen with oil removal, but extent cannot be predicted.
4. Polymeric membranes should be avoided as they foul and plug easily in oily water service.
Appendix VI - Industry Information for State of the Art Online Oil in Water Analyzers