Learning Module Week 8
Learning Module Week 8
Week 8
Course Learning Outcome Examine performance appraisal and methods of giving and receiving
feedback.
Student Learning Outcomes a.) identify the purpose and focus of performance appraisal and
discuss ways on improving performance appraisal.
b.) discuss performance appraisal feedback and the elements
needed to ensure its effectiveness.
c.) determine ways of controlling behavior.
d.) illustrate the different types of reinforcement schedules and
guidelines in developing, revamping or currently
implementing an employee rewards program.
Learning Content
PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS, FEEDBACK, AND REWARDS
Introduction
Lesson Content
PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Performance appraisal deals with how organizations evaluate and measures its
employees achievements and behaviors. It is an employee review by his manager where his
work performance is evaluated and strengths and weaknesses are identified that the employee
knows his improvement areas. Performance appraisal is the right time to set new goals and
objectives for the employees.
Periodic appraisal of performance is a key component of employee development. The
performance evaluation is intended to be a fair and balanced assessment of an employee's
performance.
Similarly, managers and employees often see performance reviews as an essential evil.
Workers fear hearing their performance is inadequate, while managers struggle to find the best
way to balance praise and criticism. But regardless of how a manager feels about putting his
The main aim of the evaluation system is to identity the performance gap (if any). This
gap is the shortfall that occurs when performance does not meet the standard set by the
organization as acceptable.
The main aim of the feedback system is to inform the employee about the quality of his
performance. (However, the information flow is not exclusively one way. The appraiser also
receives feedback from the employee about job problems, etc.)
1. Judgmental orientation – focus on past performances and provide a basis for making
judgments on which employee should be rewarded and how effective organizational
programs like selection and training have been:
a) Offer a basis for reward allocation like raises, promotion, transfers, layoffs and others
b) Identify high-potential employees
c) Validate the effectiveness of employee selection procedures
d) Evaluate previous training programs
Performance appraisal must be focus on job performance not on the performers. When
evaluating employees, it is necessary to ensure that the focus of the appraisal is on the job
performance and that it has proper weighing of relevant behaviors. There are three aspects of
relevance in the context of performance appraisal which must be avoided, they are:
1. Deficiency – It happens when the evaluation does not focus on all aspects of the job. It
certain job responsibilities are not considered; the evaluation is deficient.
2. Contamination – It happens when activities not part of the job responsibilities are included
in the evaluation. This is the exact opposite of deficiency.
3. Distortion – This takes place when an improper emphasis is given to various job elements.
1. Self-Evaluation Method
Self-evaluations are a great way to kick-off reviews. A self-evaluation is when the
employee is asked to judge their own performance against predetermined criteria. The
advantage of this kind of an appraisal is that the employee is allowed to give his input into
his performance appraisal, and the company can use this self-appraisal along with the
standard appraisal to give a more rounded employee review. The disadvantage is that an
employee may not be able to evaluate their own performance objectively, giving himself an
artificially high performance grade and making the self- appraisal less valuable. Employee
self-evaluations help to demystify the appraisal process and can provide interesting insight
into gaps between employee and manager ratings. Self-appraisals also help to ensure that
employees have read and hopefully have analyzed every corner of their performance.
Forced Distribution
Forced distribution is primarily used to eliminate rating errors such as leniency and central
tendency, but the method itself can cause rating errors because it forces disseminations
between employees even where job performance is quite similar.
Rating scale is probably the most common performance appraisal method. The rating
scale methodology requires an employer to develop an in-depth grading system, similar to the
way students in school are assessed. This graphic rating scale is then used to evaluate an
employee in terms of success within a variety of areas, such as technical skill set, teamwork and
communication skills. There is typically a minimum required grade an employee must receive in
order for the performance appraisal to be considered a success. Those that do not make the
grade are often put on a performance improvement plan.
This method gains points for simplicity and functionality, but it only works well to both
managers and employees share the same understanding of each point on the scale (tor
example, on a scale of one to ten, is an "average" performance given a mid-range rating or the
lowest rating) or it the rating categories focus on "traits rather than "behavior
Like the essay method above, the critical incident method allows supervisors to describe
an employee's excellent or poor response to situations arising during the year in question. This
method keeps answers open-ended, flexible, multi-dimensional, and respectful of context. But it
also resists standardization and comparison, and if the incidents aren’t recorded and discussed
as they occur, a subjective assessment made weeks or months later may have limited value.
Paired comparison analysis relies on a grid that presents numerical values for each
employee based on an established set of criteria. After the values are collected, they can be
reviewed against other values presented in the same format and affected by the same factors.
This method can be complex and labor intensive if done manually, but it allows the kinds of
apple-and-orange comparisons that often present philosophical challenges to HR managers who
need to standardize evaluation methods across groups of employees facing very different tasks.
Ranking
Alternative ranking makes the same demand, but the ranking process must be done in a
specified manner (for example, by first selecting the best employee in a group, then the worst,
then the second-best, then the second-worst, etc.). Comparative evaluation systems such as
ranking are rarely popular. No matter how close a group of employees is in the level of their
performance, and no matter how well they perform on the job, some will rank high and some will
end up at the bottom. Evaluators are often reluctant to make such discriminations. Also, rankings
are unable to compare employees across different groups.
Essay Method
Not every manager has the opportunity to impact or improve the overall performance
appraisal system within which they must work. But, every manager has the opportunity to take
1) Make sure managers and subordinates understand the appraisal system – The appraisal
system should be explicitly described specific to the purpose of the appraisal. Organizations
that clearly state the purpose for the appraisal reduce the confusion and ambiguity of the
process. The goal should be that everyone knows why the organization is conducting
appraisals. Think of it as purpose and procedure training.
2) Assess the effectiveness of the organization's current system – Managers and subordinates
agreed that the system uphold some functions while falling short in other functions.
Additionally, managers and subordinates have different needs. Identify them, and construct
a questionnaire to assess the degree to which org members perceive the process to be
effective. Only then is the organization in position to develop a strategy to address
shortcomings.
3) Appraisal skills training for managers is a must – It can reasonably be concluded that the
ability of the supervisor to skillfully appraise his subordinate is critical to an effective
appraisal. Training must focus on helping managers develop specific appraisal skills and
confidence in their ability to effectively evaluate others. Skills should include:
a) Goal setting
b) Communicating performance standards
c) Observing subordinate performance
d) Coaching and providing feedback
e) Completing the rating form
f) Conducting the appraisal review
5) Start with effective performance planning – Planning is required to set the stage for effective
appraisals. The majority of subordinates cited unclear performance standards as a cause
of ineffective appraisals. Meaningful and accurate evaluation and feedback requires clear
goals be established beforehand. Therefore, a large part of the process should be devoted
to determine what actions need to be taken in the future. It is harder to correct the results
of poor planning than it is to plan correctly at the beginning.
6) Make informal appraisals ongoing activity – Annual appraisals are only as effective as what
happens during the rest of the work year. Managers can increase the effectiveness by
scheduling periodic, informal appraisals with subordinates on a regular basis. Mini-
appraisals encourage honest communication, give the manager an opportunity to monitor
employee progress, provide employee with an ongoing source of feedback, and address
minor problems before they build or snowball. This can be difficult to maintain throughout
Feedback can come from many different sources like managers and supervisors,
measurement systems, peers, and customers. However certain elements are needed to ensure
its effectiveness, which are:
1.) Specificity – Feedback works best when it relates to a specific goal. Establishing
employee performance expectations and goals before work begins is the key to providing
tangible, objective, and powerful feedback. Telling employees that they are doing well
because they exceeded their goal by 10% is more effective than simply saying "you're
doing a good job."
2.) Timeliness – Employees should receive information about how they're doing as timely
as possible. If improvement needs to be made in their performance, the sooner they find
out about it the sooner they can correct the problem. If employees have reached or
exceeded a goal, the sooner they receive positive feedback, the more rewarding it is to
them.
3.) Manner – Feedback should be given in a manner that will best help improve performance.
Since people respond better to information presented in positive way, feedback should
be expressed in a positive manner. This is not to say that information should be sugar
coated. It must be accurate, factual and complete. When presented, however, feedback
is more effective when reinforces what the employee did right and then identifies what
needs to done in the future. Constant criticism eventually will fall upon deaf ears.
REINFORCEMENT THEORY
Reinforcement theory of motivation was proposed by BF Skinner and his associates. It
states that individual's behavior is a function of its consequences. It is based on "law of effect".
Individual's behavior with positive consequences tends to be repeated, but individual's behavior
with negative consequences tends not to be repeated.
Reinforcement theory explains in detail how an individual learns behavior. Managers who
are making attempt to motivate the employees must ensure that they do not reward all
employees simultaneously. They must tell the employees what they are not doing correct. They
must tell the employees how they can achieve positive reinforcement.
This theory focuses totally on what happens to an individual when he takes some action.
Thus, according to Skinner, the external environment of the organization must be designed
effectively and positively so as to motivate the employee. This theory is a strong tool for
analyzing controlling mechanism for individual's behavior. However, it does not focus on the
causes of individual's behavior.
Reinforcement Schedules
In operant conditioning, schedules of reinforcement are an important component of the
learning process. When and how often we reinforce a behavior can have a dramatic impact on
the strength and rate of the response.
A schedule of reinforcement is basically a rule stating which instances of a behavior will
be reinforced. In some case, a behavior might be reinforced every time it occurs. Sometimes, a
behavior might not be reinforced at all.
Either positive reinforcement or negative reinforcement might be used, depending
on the situation. In both cases, the goal of reinforcement is always to strengthen the behavior
and increase the likelihood that it will occur again in the future.
In real-world settings, behaviors are probably not going to be reinforced each and every
time they occur. For situations where you are purposely trying to train and reinforce an action,
such as in the classroom, in sports, or in animal training you might opt to follow a specific
reinforcement schedule.
2.) In partial reinforcement – the response is reinforced only part of the time. Learned
behaviors are acquired more slowly with partial reinforcement, but the response is
more resistant to extinction. there are four schedules of partial reinforcement:
a.) Fixed-ratio schedules are those where a response is reinforced only after a
specified number of responses. This schedule produces a high, steady rate of
responding with only a brief pause after the delivery of the reinforcer.
b.) Variable-ratio schedules occur when a response is reinforced after
unpredictable number of responses. This schedule creates a high steady rate
of responding. Gambling and lottery games are good examples a reward
based on a variable ratio schedule.
c.) Fixed-interval schedules are those where the first response is rewarded only
after a specified amount of time has elapsed. This schedule causes high
amounts of responding near the end of the interval, but much slower
responding immediately after the delivery of the reinforcer.
d.) Variable-interval schedules occur when a response is rewarded after an
unpredictable amount of time has passed. This schedule produces a slow,
steady rate of response.
10) Never take a good performance for granted – It can be easy to stop rewarding top
performers, but this could be a fatal flaw. In order to keep top talent on the team,
ensure that your company continues to acknowledge and reward an excellent
performance.
11) Provide rewards immediately after the employee achieves the desired behavior –
There is a temporal component to the effect of the reward. The longer the delay in
providing the reward after the employee's achievement, the less of an impact it has
shaping subsequent behavior. Reward behavior that meets performance standards
immediately.
12) Match the reward to the employee – Allow each employee to select their own
reward or decide what rewards employees should receive under predefined
Circumstances. This will enhance their commitment to achieving the rewarded by
20) Change the rewards frequently – When the reward is changed frequently, employees
will be more surprised and the process will be more exciting. When employees are
excited about rewards, they will work harder to achieve them.
Intrinsic Rewards
Intrinsic motivation is internal to the person in that it is something that has to be offered
to oneself and is driven by personal interest or enjoyment in the work itself. Because intrinsic
motivation exists within the individual, achieving it does not depend on others. Some people
believe that the most powerful rewards come from inside a person.
The following are descriptions of intrinsic rewards and how workers view them:
2) Sense of choice – A person will feel free to choose how to accomplish his work, to use
his best judgment to select those work activities that make the most sense to him and to
perform them in ways that seem appropriate. He feels ownership his work, believe in the
approach he is taking and feel responsible for making it work.
3) Sense of competence – A person feels that he is handling his work activities we that
performance of these activities meets or exceeds his personal standard and that he is
doing good, high-quality work. A person feels a sense satisfaction, pride, or even artistry
in how well he handles these activities.
4) Sense of progress – A person is encouraged that his efforts are really accomplishing
something. He feels that his work is on track and moving in the right direction. He sees
convincing signs that things are working out, giving him confidence in the choices he has
made and confidence in the future.
Extrinsic Rewards
Extrinsic motivation is based on tangible rewards. Unlike intrinsic motivation that is self-
administered, extrinsic motivation is external to the individual and is typically offered by a
supervisor or manager who holds all the power in relation to when extrinsic rewards are offered
and in what amount. Extrinsic rewards are usually financial in nature, such as a raise in salary,
a bonus for reaching Some quota or paid time off. However, extrinsic rewards can also be as
simple as getting the better office, verbal praise, public recognition or awards, promotions and
additional responsibility.
There are seven different approaches to rewards that are not yet widely tested but are
being considered by managers: They are the following:
1) Skill-based pay – Skill-based pay refers to a pay system in which pay increases are
linked to the number or depth of skills an employee acquires and applies and it is a means
of developing broader and deeper skills among the workforce. Such increases are in
addition to, and not in lieu oft, general pay increases employees may receive. Thee pay
increases are usually tied to three types of skills:
a) horizontal skills, which involve a broadening of skills in terms of the range of tasks
b) vertical skills, which involve acquiring skills of a higher level
c) depth skills, which involve a high level of skills in specialized areas relating to the
same job
2) Broad banding – Abroad broad banding pay structure uses a small number of large
salary pay ranges, instead of many different pay grades within an organization. The main
objective of a broadband is to reduce salary ranges within a certain level but introduce
broader pay ranges within a job level or family. Broad banding systems are implemented
to allow greater flexibility in compensation. It is this flexibility that often flattens the
hierarchy of an organization and is sometimes appealing to large organizations.
Flattening of a hierarchy can be interpreted as collapsing salary grades into a few wide
bands containing many different jobs and salaries.
5) Part-time benefits – Employers generally choose whether their part-time employees will
receive most benefits. These benefits include vacation time holiday pay, sick leave,
medical insurance, retirement benefits and disability insurance. All are considered
voluntary benefits, since providing the benefits is at the employer's discretion.
Assessment
Mini – Case Study: Read this mini – case study and answer the case questions below.
Andy Davis was proud of his restaurant, The Golden Bow. Its location was perfect, its
decor tasteful, its clientele generous and distinguished. When he first took over the business a
year ago, Davis had worried that the local labor shortage might make it difficult to hire good
workers. But he had made some contacts at a local college and hired a group of servers who
worked well with customers and with one another. The only problem he still had not solved was
the dishwasher.
At first Davis felt lucky when he found Eddie Munz, a local high school dropout who had
some experience washing dishes. Davis could not afford to pay a dishwasher more than $4 an
hour, but Eddie did not seem to mind that. Moreover, Eddie seemed to get the dishes clean. But
he was so slow! Davis originally thought Eddie just was not quick about anything, but he changed
his mind as he observed his behavior in the kitchen. Eddie loved to talk to the cooks, often
turning his back on the dishes for minutes at a time to chitchat. He also nibbled desserts off of
dirty plates and sprayed the servers with water whenever they got near him. The kitchen was
always a mess, and so many dishes piled up that often two hours after closing time, when
everything else was ready for the next clay, Eddie would still be scraping and squirting and
talking. Davis began to wonder if there was a method to Eddie's madness: He was getting paid
by the hour, so why should he work faster? But Davis did not like having a constantly sloppy
kitchen, so he determined to have a talk with Eddie.
Davis figured out that Eddie had been making Php28 on his reasonably efficient nights
and then met with Eddie and made him a proposal. First he asked Eddie how soon he thought
he could finish after the last customer left. Eddie said an hour and a quarter. When Davis asked
if he would be interested in getting off forty-five minutes earlier than he had been, Eddie seemed
excited. And when he offered to pay Eddie the Php28 for a complete job every night, regardless
of when he finished, Eddie could hardly contain himself. It turned out he did not like to work until
2:00 a.m., but he needed every dollar he could get.
The next week, a new chalkboard appeared next to the kitchen door leading out to the
dining room. On top it read, "Eddie's Goal for a Record Time." By the end of the first week, Davis
had printed on the bottom "1." Davis began inspecting the dishes more often than usual, but he
found no decrease in the quality of Eddie's work. So on Sunday, he said to Eddie, "Let's try for
an hour."
A month later, the board read "42 minutes." The situation in the kitchen had changed
radically. The former "Eddie the Slob" had become "Eddie the Perfectionist."
Case Questions
2. Which elements of total quality management and performance management did Andy
Davis use?
3. Could Davis have use a different system of rewards to get the same results m Eddie
Munz?