Ehandbook Master Your Mixing v2
Ehandbook Master Your Mixing v2
Master
Your Mixing
Our Engineering Services
/// IKA is where people turn visions into reality
TABLE OF CONTENTS
First, Select the Right Blender 5
Understand the pros and cons of three key kinds of devices
Additional Resources 18
AD INDEX
IKA Works Inc. • www.ikausa.com 2
Arde Barinco • www.arde-barinco.com 4
Netzsch • www.netzsch.com 8
T
he choice of blender type dramat- blenders: mechanical, gravity and fluid-as-
ically can affect end results. Yet, sist devices.
often we put a product in whatever
blender is available. That’s a mistake. Each MECHANICAL BLENDERS
blender is unique; they may vary in typical Most such units are small capacity. Let’s
blend time and quality, blender capacity, look at four options.
scaleup, maintenance and attrition. So, let’s • The double-cone blender has been the
compare blender types. workhorse of the industry, especially for
batch operations. Blend times typically
The number of options can seem over- run one to two hours. Maintenance is low.
whelming. One manufacturer’s selection Attrition is moderate but particles may
guide I recently looked at showed several segregate on discharge. Internals, which
hundred blender types. I don’t doubt that come in many variations (ribbons, baffles,
their differences are real in the eyes of the etc.), can improve blend quality and mini-
designer — but I’ve usually found that the mize segregation.
particulate solids characteristics of the • Paddle or ribbon blenders provide much
material to be blended are more import- lower blend times and often serve in
ant than some subtle variation in a unit’s continuous processes. Low-speed units
mechanical design. For simplicity, I suggest may reach a good blend in one to 15
concentrating on three overall types of minutes. In contrast, high-speed devices
may achieve the same blend in five to 30 The traditional static flow tube smooths out
seconds but the number of fine particles small variations. However, mass-flow or multi-
generated may override blend quality. cone blender designs largely have replaced it
Maintenance is moderate but attrition is because they can reach a high quality blend
high for high-speed devices. in a couple of turnovers. Moreover, they are
• Riffle blenders can match the blend qual- easier to scale up than flow tubes and are
ity of a high-speed blender and create lower in maintenance. Other than attrition
less attrition. However, their maintenance from the pneumatic conveyor, particle break-
(cleaning) is high and they don’t scale up age is minimal in these devices.
very well.
• Screw blenders aren’t known for blending FLUID-ASSIST BLENDERS
applications but can reach a good batch These devices often are costlier than the
blend in three to five minutes with mod- other two categories but compensate by
erate attrition. Maintenance is high but providing better blend quality. Let’s exam-
scaleup is easy. ine four alternatives.
• The lift-tube blender could be consid-
For continuous operation and the best ered a gravity blender — but recirculation
blend quality, I suggest a loss-in-weight is internal to the device and blending
feeder. It scales up easily and creates little can take place during tank filling, which
to no attrition. The device demands only smooths out production variations over a
low to moderate maintenance but often is longer time frame. Scaleup is moderately
an expensive alternative. easy and maintenance is low. Attrition is
negligible because the recirculation loop
GRAVITY BLENDERS has no feeders or elbows. The design of
Storage of large quantities of bulk material the internal cone controls blend quality.
frequently requires some blending to com- • The fluidized bed probably is the most
pensate for segregation or process variations. effective fluid-assist blender. It works well
Achieving the best quality blend may call in batch or continuous operation. Blend
for recirculation via pneumatic conveying. time is on the order of minutes versus
hours and scaleup is easy. Most mainte- • Blenders using a jet or venturi work
nance is external to the device; proper well with fine materials and can give an
grid design minimizes attrition. excellent blend. Scaleup is easy but main-
• The spouted bed, a cousin to the fluidized tenance can be high. These devices better
bed, is a favorite for coating particles as suit liquid/particle blending.
well as giving a good blend in only one
turnover. Attrition is very low, especially Throughout this column I haven’t talked
with big and light particles, because most much about blend quality because this
attrition occurs as the particles fall back mostly is a function of the particles in the
onto the bed. Scaleup is moderately system. Experimental data are a must to
easy; units require little maintenance and define blend quality.
cleanup is easy.
M
any processors rely on mixing equip- turbines in medium- to low-viscosity blend-
ment that is more than 25 years old. ing and solids suspension applications. A
Even if the equipment isn’t worn out, typical pitched-blade turbine (Figure 1)
it almost certainly was designed for different has four blades made of flat plates. The
conditions and often different processes or most common hydrofoil impellers have
products. The design may not suit the current three blades with a curved cross-section
application or product. In the last 25 years, (Figure 2). The curved cross-section is
many products have become more viscous or called camber; it furnishes a degree of lift
non-Newtonian, making mixing more difficult. and a smooth change of flow direction. Just
like the wings on an airplane, the hydro-
Over that same period, new types of foil blades provide a downward force with
impellers and ways of applying them have an efficient transfer of power. The advan-
improved mixing with the same power and tage of the hydrofoil impellers is greater
speed. These developments often open up efficiency in creating axial flow. The axial
opportunities to enhance performance with- flow pattern generated in a stirred tank
out replacing the equipment or resorting to produces good vertical circulation, which
expensive upgrades. helps to carry surface additions throughout
the vessel. In solids suspension, the axial
While not a recent improvement, hydrofoil flow directed toward the bottom of the
impellers have replaced many pitched-blade vessel lifts solids off the bottom. Delivering
the same power at the same speed with The first step in assessing a unit is to estab-
a slightly larger diameter hydrofoil impel- lish the current design. Older equipment
ler may improve mixer performance at a may lack good drawings. Even when draw-
modest cost for a new impeller. ings are available, they may not include
modifications made after the original
Some mixers have under-loaded motors. equipment was installed. Many equipment
A unit with a 25-hp motor actually only modifications can enable cost-effective
may deliver 10 hp to the mixed liquid. improvements to process performance
This points up the difference between without completely replacing an old mixer.
two important and often confused Beyond basic tank dimensions and impeller
characteristics: motor power and impeller type, the two most critical characteristics of
power. The motor power establishes the mixing equipment are impeller diameter and
maximum power the impeller can deliver rotational speed. For low viscosity turbulent
to the fluid. The impeller power reflects liquid mixing, impeller power is propor-
the rotational force (torque) the impeller tional to the rotational speed cubed and
applies to the fluid and the rotational the impeller diameter to the fifth power.
speed or rate of energy dissipation. For instance, a 10% boost in the rotational
Impeller conditions, power, torque, tip speed will raise the impeller power by 33%.
speed and pumping rate are the key Increasing the impeller diameter by only 5%
factors that create the mixing intensity will push up the impeller power by 28%.
and process performance of a mixer.
Increasing the impeller power may offer an When analyzing mixing equipment, you
opportunity for improvement. must ensure accurate measurement of the
Increasing Viscosity
IMPACT OF VISCOSITY
Figure 3. When using turbine-style impellers, viscosity can significantly affect the optimum equip-
ment configuration.
behave as “low” viscosity liquids in most to cause complete fluid motion. Some
industrial-size mixers. However, by the mixers for high viscosity applications may
time you get to glucose (500 cP), corn have multiple impellers for different process
syrup (1,400 cP) and honey (5,000 cP), the requirements. Figure 4 depicts a mixer for
effects of viscosity on mixing become more such a service; it has both high-speed dis-
evident. The fluid motion at these moderate perser blades and a low-speed impeller with
viscosities begins to decline away from the angled sweep blades.
mixing impeller because the viscosity resists
the fluid flow. When using turbine-style Simply blending liquids of different viscos-
impeller mixers with these moderate vis- ities is difficult but mixing another phase
cosity fluids, you often must resort to more with a liquid can be far tougher. Incorpo-
or larger impellers to accomplish uniform rating the second phase, whether solid
blending. A single impeller in a baffled tank particles, a gas or an immiscible liquid,
might handle a low viscosity application usually begins with a dispersion process.
while a slightly higher viscosity may require The requirements for a dispersion applica-
two impellers and a moderately high viscos- tion differ from those for liquid blending.
ity may demand two larger impellers. At a The mixing intensity necessary to initially
sufficiently high viscosity, the resistance to disperse particles, gases and immiscible liq-
motion at the wall may eliminate the need uids usually occurs in the immediate region
for baffles. As the number and size of impel- of the mixing impeller. The equipment also
lers increase, so does the impeller power must provide a recirculating flow pattern
requirement. Figure 3 shows the progres- sufficient to maintain a degree of uniformity
sion from a single impeller to dual impellers for the dispersed phase. Some dispersions
to larger impellers and then to impellers are intended to form a stable product.
without baffles. More or different impel- Others must continue to be agitated to
lers might provide the increased mixing retain sufficient uniformity for the desired
required for processes at higher viscosities. process result.
“Extremely high” viscosity materials such as For any mixing process, the equipment
peanut butter (250,000 cP) and caulking should be sufficiently versatile and robust
compound (5,000,000 cP) barely flow at to handle reasonable differences in raw
room temperature. Even at elevated tem- materials or operating temperatures. Pre-
perature, such materials can be difficult to dictable raw material variations shouldn’t
mix. Creating the desired uniformity in these cause frequent failures. In the kitchen or
products requires special mixing equip- laboratory, increasing stirring speed or
ment, often with large diameter impellers, extending mixing time often can achieve
differences aren’t always single or unique Coppell, Texas. E-mail him at [email protected].
Recharge Your
Approach to Mixing
Consider inline mixing to minimize costs and improve quality
MIXER COMPARISON
Figure 1. Compared to a standard plant mixer, inline mixers can cut processing time significantly
while also reducing power consumption.
mixing processes inevitably release heat Because this process often leads to lump
energy, dispersing with high efficiency formation and the mixture remains inho-
is important. mogeneous despite long mixing times,
additional filters and subsequent dispersing
CONVENTIONALLY MIXED processes must be used. After the container
Coating compound production previously has been emptied, residual amounts adhere
was done with low-efficiency, slow-run- to the stirring tool as well as the container
ning batch processes. High-speed stirrers wall, which leads to complicated cleaning
for binder solutions and planetary mixers and high solvent use.
were and are mostly used for blending. The
low energy input is one of the reasons why ADVANCED MIXED
these machines have such long mixing and The rapidly increasing demand for coating
dispersing times. As a result, many batch materials and requirement for materials
devices are required, which are expen- down to nano size necessitate advanced
sive to purchase, maintain and clean. To production technology that works effi-
achieve an even dispersion, the complete ciently and is suitable for mass production.
batch always is circulated with a large stir- At the heart of advanced dispersion tech-
ring tool. nology are in-line devices. The product to
then is inducted in and dispersed. The IKA Germany. He can be reached at Ralf.buergelin@
WHITE PAPERS
Check out our library of white papers covering myriad
topics and offering valuable insight into products and solu-
tions important to chemical processing professionals. From
automation to fluid handling, separations technologies and
utilities, this white paper library has it all.
MINUTE CLINIC
Chemical Processing’s Minute Clinic podcast series is
designed to tackle one critical issue at a time — giving you
hard-hitting information in just minutes.
addressed? Visit our Ask the Experts forum. Covering Jerry King. Click on an image and you
topics from combustion to steam systems, our roster of will arrive at a page with the winning
leading subject matter experts, as well as other forum caption and all submissions for that