UNIT 3: INTRODUCTION TO LINEAR PROGRAMMING

Contents
3.0 Aims and Objectives
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Linear Programming Models
3.3 Formulating Lp Models
3.4 Solution Approaches to Linear Programming Problems

3.0 OBJECTIVES AND AIMS

At the end of this chapter students will be able to apply the knowledge of linear
programming to solve managerial problems, they will be able to use linear programming
models to solve managerial problems having quantitative application.

3.1 INTRODUCTION

Linear programming- is an optimization method which shows how to allocate scarce

resources in the best possible way subject to more than one limiting condition expressed
in the form of inequalities and /or equations. It
- enables users to find optional solution to certain problems in which the solution
must satisfy a given set of requirements or constraints.
- Optimization in linear programming implies either maximization (max) Profit,
We can’t
max/min two revenue, sales, market share or minimization (min) Cost, time, distance, or a
quantities in one
model.
certain objective function.
- Involves linearly related multi-variety functions i.e. functions with more than one
independent variables.
- The goal in linear programming is to find the best solution given the constraints
imposed by the problem, hence the term constrained optimization.

3.2 LINEAR PROGRAMMING MODELS

LP models are mathematical representation of LP problems. Some models have a

specialized format where as others have a more generalized format. Despite this, LPMs

58
have certain characteristics in common knowledge of these characteristics enables us to
recognize problems that are amenable to a solution using LP models and to correctly
formulate an LP model. The characteristics can be grouped into two categories:
Components and assumptions.
assumptions. The components relate to the structure of a model, where
as the assumptions describe the conditions under which the model is valid.

Components Assumptions
1. Objective function 1. Linearity
2. Decision variables Model 2. Divisibility
Model
3. Constraints Structure 3. Certainty Validity
4. Parameters and Right. 4. Non-negativity
Hand Side Values

3.2.1 Components of LP Model

a) The Objective function: is the mathematical/ quantitative expression of the
objective of the company/ model. The objective in problem solving is the criterion
by which all decisions are evaluated. In LPMs a single quantifiable objective must
be specified by the decision maker. For example, the objective might relate to
profits, or costs or market share, best to only one of these. Moreover, because we
are dealing with optimization, the objective will be either maximization or
minimization, but not both at a time
b) The Decision Variables: represent unknown quantities to be resolved for. These
decision variables may represent such things as the:
- number of units of different products to be sold
- the # of dollars to invest in various projects
- the # of ads to place with different media
Since the decision maker has freedom of choice among actions, these decision variables
are controllable variables.

c) The constraints: are restrictions which define or limit the attainability

(achievability) feasibility of a proposed course of action. They limit the degree to
which the objective can be pursued.

59
 A typical restriction embodies scarce resources (such as labor supply, RMs, production
capacity, machine time, storage space), legal or contractual requirements (leg. Product
standards, work standards), or they may reflect other limits based on forecasts, customer
orders, company policies etc.

d) Parameters- are fixed values that specify the impact that one unit of each decision
variable will have on the objective and on any constraint it pertains to as well as
to the numerical value of each constraint.
The components are the building blocks of an LP model. We can better understand their
meaning by examining a simple LP model as follows.

Example:
Maximize:
Maximize: 4X1 + 7X2 + 5X3 (profit)… objective function subject to
2X1 + 3X2 + 6X3 300 labor hrs
5X1 + 4X3 200 raw mata. System
Constraints
3X1 + 5X2 + 2X3 360
X1 = 30 Individual
X1 – qty of product 1 X2 40 Constraints
Variables
Decision

X2 qty of product 2 X1, X2, X3 0 Non negativity constructs

X3 qty of product 3

System constraints-
constraints- involve more than one decision variables
Individual constraint-
constraint- involve only one decision variable.
None-negativity constrains-
constrains- specify that no variable will be allowed to take on a negative
value. The non negativity constraints typically apply in an LP model, whether they are
explicitly stated or not.

3.2.2 Assumption of LP models

a) Linearity
The linearity requirement is that each decision variable has a linear impact on the
objective function and in each constraint in which it appears. Taking the above example,

60
producing one more unit of products add br 4 to the total profit. This is true over the
entire range of possible values of x1. The same applies (true) to each of the constraints.

b) Divisibility: The divisibility requirement pertains to potential values of decision

variables. If is assumed that non-integer values are acceptable. For example: 3.5 TV sets/
hr would be acceptable 7TV sets/ 2hr.

c) Certainty: The parameters are known and constant. The certainty requirement
involves two aspects of LP models. The constraint equations do not change.
(1) With respect to model parameters (i.e. the numerical values) –If is assumed that
these values are known and constant. Eg. In the above example each unit of product
1 requires 2 labor hours is known and remain constant, and also the 300 labor
available is deemed to be known and constant.
(2) All the relevant constraints identified and represented in the model are as they are.

d) Non-negativity-
Non-negativity- The non-negativity constraint is that negative values of variables are
unrealistic and, therefore, will not be considered in any potential solutions, only positive
values and zero will be allowed.

3.3 FORMULATING LP MODELS

Once a problem has been defined, the attention of the analyst shifts to formulating a
model. Just as it is important to carefully formulate the model that will be used to solve
the problem. If the LP model is ill formulated, ill-structured, it can easily lend to poor
decisions.

Formulating linear programming models involves the following steps:

1) Define the problem/ problems definition:
definition: to determine the no. of type 1 and type 2
products to be produced per month so as to maximize the monetary profit given
the restriction.
2) Identity the decision variables or represent unknown quantities.
quantities.
* Let X1 and X2 be the monthly quantities of type 1 and type 2 products.
3) Determine the objective function: Once the variables have been identified, the
objective function can be specified. It is necessary to decide if the problem is a

61
 maximization or a minimization problem and the coefficients of each decision
variable.

4) Identify the constraints

- system constraints- more than one variable
- individual constraints- one variable
- non-negativity constraints.

Q(1) Check Your Progress Question

1. A firm that assembles computers computer equipment is about to start production of
two new micro computers. Each type of microcomputer will require assembly time,
inspection time, and storage space. The amount of each of there resources that can be
devoted to the production of micro computers is limited. The mgnager. Of the firm would
like to determine the quantity of each micro computer to produce in order to maximize
the profit generated by sales of these micro computers.

Additional information
In order to develop a suitable model of the problem, the manager has met with the design
and manufacturing personnel. As a result of these meetings, the manager has obtained the
following information:

Type 1 Type 2
Profit per unit $ 60 $ 50
Assembly time per unit 4hrs 10hrs
Inspection time per unit 2hrs 1hr
Storage space per unit 3 cubic ft 3 cubic ft

The manager also has acquired information on the available company resources. These
(weekly) amounts are:
Resource Resource available
Assembly time 100hrs
Inspection time 22hrs
Storage space 39cubic feet

62
The manager has also met with the firms marketing manager and learned that demand for
the micro computers was such that what ever combination of these two types of micro
computers is produced, all of the out put can be sold.

Answer for the above check your progress question

Step 1:
1: Problem definition
- To determine the no. of two types of microcomputers to be produced (and sold)
per week so as to maximize the weekly profit given the restrictions.

Step 2: Variable representation

- Let X1 and X2 be the weekly quantities of type 1 and type 2 microcomputers
respectively.

Step 3: Develop the objective function

Maximize or Z max = 60X1 + 50X2
Step 4: Constraint identification
 System constraints: 4X1 + 10X2 100hrs Assembly
2X1 + X2 22hrs Inspective
3X1 + 3X2 39 cub Feet Storage
 Individual constraints ….No
 Non-negativity constraint ….X1, X2 0

In summary, the mathematical model for the microcomputer problem is:

Z max = 60X1 + 50X2
Subject to
4X1 + 10X2 100
2X1 + X2 22
3X1 + 3X2 39
X1, X2 0
Q(2) Check your progress

63
2. An electronics firm produces three types of switching devices. Each type involves a
two-step assembly operation. The assembly times are shown in the following table:
Assembly time per unit (minutes)
Station 1 Station 2
Model A 2.5 3.0
Model B 1.8 1.6
Model C 2.0 2.2
7.5hr 7.5hr
Each workstation has a daily working time of 7.5 hrs. The manager want to obtain the
greatest possible profit during the next five working days. Model A yields a profit of br.
8.25 per unit, Model B a profit of br 7.5 per unit and model C a profit of Br 7.8 per unit.
Assume that the firm can sell all it produces. During this time, but it must fill outstanding
orders for 20 units of each model type.
Required.
Required. Formulate the linear programming model of this problem.
Solution for check your progress question number 2.
Step 1: Problem definition: to determine the number of three types of searching devices
to be produced to be produced and sold for the next 5 days (working) so as to maximize
the 5 days profit.

2. Variable representation
Let X1, X2, and X3 be the number of model A, B and C sketching devices to be produced
and sold.

3. Develop objective function

Z max = 8.25X1 + 7.50X2 + 7.80X3

4.Constraint identification
2.5X1 + 1.8X2 + 2.0X3 450minutes…Assembly time station 1 System
Constraints
3.0X1 + 1.6X2 + 2.2X3 450minutes…. Assembly time station2
X1 20 …. Model A
Individual
X2 20 ….Model B Constraints
X3 20….Model C
X1, X2, X3 0 ….no negativity

64
Summary
Z max = 8.25X1 + 7.50X2 + 7.8X3
Subject to: 2.5X1 + 1.8X2 + 2X3 450
3X1 + 1.6X2 + 2.2X3 450
X1 20
X2 20
X3 20
X1 X2 X3 0

3.4 SOLUTION APPROACHES TO LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS

There are too approaches to solve linear programming problems.

1. The graphic solution method
2. The algebraic solution/ simplex algorithm

3.4.1 The Graphic solution Method

It’s a relatively straight forward method for determining the optional solution to certain
linear programming problems.
It gives us a clear picture.

This method can be used only to solve problems that involve two decision variables.
However, most linear programming applications involve situations that have more than
two decision variables, so the graphic approach is not used to solve these.

Example 1. Solving the micro-computer problem with graphic approach.

Z max: 60X1 + 50X2
S.t: 4X1 + 10X2 100
2X1 + X2 22
3X1 + 3X2 39
X1 X2 0
Steps
1. Plot each of the constraints and identify its region.

65
 2. Identify the common region, which is all area that contains all of the points that
satisfy the entire set of constraints.
3. Determine the optional solution-identify the point which lead to maximum benefit
or minimum cost.
4X1 + 10X2 = 100 2X1 + X2 = 22 3X1 + 3X2 = 39
X1 0 25 X1 0 11 X1 0 13
X2 10 0 X2 22 0 X2 13 0

24 Region ABCDE is called feasible region

(0 22) point C = ? 2x1 + x2 = 22 x-3
20 3x1 + 3x2 = 39
-6x1 + 3x2 = -66
16 3x1 + 3x2 = 39
-3x1 = -27
12
x1 = -27/-3 = 9
2(9) + x2 = 22
8 x2 = 22 – 18 = 4
Point D = 3x1 + 3x2 = 39 x - 4
4 4x1 + 10x2 = 100x3
= -12x1 + 12x2 = -156
12x1 + 30x2 = 300
0
18x2 = 144
A 4 8 B 12 16 20 24 x2 = 8
3x1 + 3(8) = 39
3x1 = 39 – 24
x1 = 15/3 = 5

To identity the maximum (minimum) value we use the corner point approach or the
extreme point approach. The corner point/ extreme point approach has one theorem. It
states that:

For problems that have optional solutions, a solution will occur at an extreme, or corner
point. Thus if a problem has a single optional solution, it will occur at a corner point. If it
has multiple optional solutions, at least one will occur at a corner point consequently, in
searching for an optional solution to a problem, we need any consider the extreme points
because one of those must be optional. Further, determining the value of the objective
function at each corner point, we could identify the optional solution by selecting the
corner point that has the best value (i.e. maximum or minimum, depending on the
optimization case) of the objective function. Extreme points represent interactions of
constraints.

66
Determine the values of the decision variables at each corner point. Some times, this can
be done by impaction (observation) and sometimes by simultaneous equation.
Substitute the value of the decision variables at each corner point into the objective
function to obtain its value at each corner point.
After all corner points have been so evaluated, select the one with the highest or lowest
value depending on the optimization case.
Value of the obi
Corner Coordinates How function Z = 60X1 + 50X2
Points X1 X2 determined?
A 0 0 observation 0 br
B 11 0 observation 660 br
C 9 4 Simultaneous 740 br
equation

D 5 8 Simultaneous 700 br
equation

E 0 10 Observation 500 br

Basic Solution
X1 = 9 X2 = 4 Z = 740 Br.
After we have got the optimal solution,
solution, we have to substitute the value of the decision
variables into the constraints and check whether all the resources available are used or
not. If there is any unused resources we can use it for any other purpose. The amount of
unused resource is known as slack-
slack- the amount of a scarce resource that is unused by a
given solution. The slack can range from zero, for a case in which all of a particular
resource is used, to the original amount of the resource that was available (i.e. none of it
is used.)

Computing the amount of slack

Originally unused Amount of slack
Amount used available (Available-used)

Constraint X1 = 9X2 = 4
Assembly 4(9) + 10(4) = 76 100 100 – 76 = 24 hrs

67
Impective 2(9) 9+ 1(4) = 22 22 22 – 22 = 0 hr
Storage 3(9) + 3(4) = 39 39 39 – 39 = 0 hr
Constraints that have no slack are sometimes referred to as binding constraints since they
limit or bind the solution. In the above cases, inspection time and storage space are
binding constraints, while assembly time has slack.

Knowledge of unused capacity can be useful for planning. A manager may be able to use
the remaining assembly time for other products, or, perhaps to schedule equipment
maintenance, safety seminars, training sermons or other activities

Interpretation: The company is advised to produce 9 units of type 1 micro computer and 4
units of type 2 micro computers per week to maximize its early profit to Br. 740, and in
doing so the company would be left with unused resource of 24 assembly hrs which can
be used for other purposes.

Example 2: Solving the diet problem with graphic approach.

C min = 5X1 + 8X2
10X1 + 30X2 140 10X1 + 30X2 = 140
20X1 + 15X2 145 X1 0 14
X1 , X2 0 X2 14/3 0
20X1 + 15X2 = 145 X1 0 +-25
X2 9.67 0
X2

12

8
A
4 B

0 C X1
4 8 12 16

20X1 +15X2 = 145

Value of obj

68
 coordinates How determined Function cmin = 5X + 8X2
Points X1 X2
A 0 9.67 Observation 77.3 br.
B 5 3 Simul. equn. 49 br.
C 14 0 Observation 70 br.

Basic solution X1 = 5 pounds X2 = 3 pounds C = 49 br.

Interpretation to make the diet the minimum cost of br 49 we have to purchase 5
pounds of type 1 food and 3 pounds type 2 food.

If there is a difference between the minimum required amount and the optimal solution,
we call the difference surplus; that is: surplus is the amount by which the optimal solution
causes a constraint to exceed the required minimum amount. It can be determined in
the same way that slack can: substitute the optimum values of the decision variables into
the left side of the constraint and solve. The difference between the resulting value and
the original right-hand side amount is the amount of surplus.
Surplus can potentially occur in a constraint.

3.4.2 The Simplex Algorithm/ Algebraic Solution Method

The simplex method is an iterative technique that begins with a feasible solution that is
not optimal, but serves as a starting point. Through algebraic manipulation, the solution is
improved until no further improvement is possible (i.e. until the optional solution has
been identified.) Each iteration moves one step closer to the optional solution.

The optimal solution to a linear programming model will occur at an extreme point of the
feasible solution space. This is true even if a model involves more than two variables;
optsmal solutions will occur at these point of the feasible solution space; some will be
outside of the feasible solution space. Hence, not every solution will be a feasible
solution. Solutions which represent infasseetwim of constraints are called basic solutions;
solutions;
those which also satisfy all of the constraints, including the non-negativity constraints,
are called basic feasible solutions. The simplex method is an algebraic procedure for
systematically examining basic feasible solutions. If an optimal solution exists, the

69
simplex method will identify it. # of basic solution n + mCm  not all basic solutions are
feasible.

The simplex procedure for a maximization problem with all constraints consists of the
following steps.
1. Write the LPM in a Standard form: When all of the constraints are written as
equalities, the LP program is said to be in a standard form. We convert the LPM in to
a standard form by applying the slack variables, s, which carries a subscript that
denotes which constraint it applies to. For example, s1 refers to the amount of slack in
the first constraint, S2 to the amount of slack in the second constraint, and so on.
When slack variables are introduced to the constraints, they are no longer inequalities
b/c the slack variable accounts, they become equalities. Further more, every variable
in a model must be represented in the objective function. However, since slack does
not provide any real contribution to the objective, each slack variable is a assigned a
coefficient of zero in the objective function.
Slack = Requirement – Production, scruples – Production – Requirement
Taking the microcomputer problem, its standard form is as follows
Z max = 60X1 + 50X2 Z max = 60X1 + 50X2 + 0S1 + 0S2 + 0S3
4X1 + 10X2 100 4X1 + 10X2 + S1 = 100
2X1 + X2 22  2X1 + X2 + S2 = 22
3X1 + 3X2 39 3X1 + 3X2 + S3 = 39
X1, X2 0 All variables 0
(X1, X2, S1, S2, S3 0)
2. Develop the initial tableau
a. List the variables across the top of the table and write the objective function
coefficient of each variables just above it.
b. There should be one row in the body of the table for each constraint. List the slack
variables in the basis column, one per row.
c. In the Cj column, enter the objective function coefficient of zero for each slack
variable.
d. Compute values for row Zj. Cj = Coeff of variable J in the obj function.

e. Computer values for Cj – Zj. bj = RHSV of constraint i.

Aij – coefficient of variable j in constraint i

Pivot column Pivot element

70
 Solution Cj 60 50 0 0 0 100/4 = 25
leaving
Basis X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 RHSV 22/2 = 11
S1 0 4 10 1 0 0 100 39/3 = 13

S2 0 2 1 0 1 0 22
S3 0 3 3 0 0 1 39
Zj 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cj - Zj 60 50 0 0 0
Initial feasible solution
S1 = 100 Obtained by
Entering variable S2 = 22 equating tow
S3 =39 Variables to
X1 = 0 Zero
X2 = 0 Decision
Z = 0 Variable

3. Develop subsequent tables

3.1 Identify the entry variable –variable that has a largest positive value in the Cj – Zj
row.
3.2 Identify the leaving variable –using the constraint coefficient or substitution rates
in the entering variable column divide each one into the corresponding quantity value.
However do not divide by a zero or negative value. The smalls non negative ratio that
results indicate which variable will leave the solution
4. Find unique vectors for the new basic variable using row operations on the pivot
element.
-1/2 R21 –4R2new + R1old, -3R2new + R3old
Solution Cj 60 50 0 0 0
Cj = bi/xj (aij)
Basics X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 RHSV
56/8 = 7
11/1/2 = 22
S1 0 0 8 1 -2 0 56 6/3/2 = 4
X1 60 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 11
S3 0 0 3/2 0 -3/2 1 6
Zs 60 30 0 30 0 660
Cj – Zj 0 20 0 -30 0

Incoming Variable

71
 Solution Cj 60 50 0 0 0 RHSV
basis X1 X2 S1 S2 S3
S1 0 0 0 1 6 -16/3 24
X1 60 1 0 0 1 -1/3 9
X2 50 0 1 0 -1 2/3 4
Zj 60 50 0 10 40/3 740
Opportunity cost
Cj - Zj 0 0 0 -10 -40/3

5. Compute Cj – Zj row
6. If all Cj – Zj Values are zeros and negatives, you have reached optimality
7. If this is not the case (step 6), repeat 2 to 5 until you get optional solution.
“A simplex solution in a maximization problem in optional if the Cj – Zj row consists
entirely of zeros and negative numbers (i.e. there are no positive values in the bottom
row.)”
Note: The variables in solution all have unit vectors in their respective columns for
the constraint equations. Further, note that a zero appears in row C – Z in every
column whose variable is in solution, in row C – Z in every column whose variable is
in solution, indicating that its maximum contribution to the objective function has
been realized.
Example 2
A manufacture of lawn and garden equipment makes two basic types of lawn mowers; a
push type and a self propelled model. The push type require 9 minutes to assemble and 2
minutes to package; the self-propelled mover requires 12 minute to assemble and 6
minutes to package. Each type has an engine. The company has 12hrs of assembly time
available, 75 engines, and 5hrs of packing time profits are Birr 70 for the self propelled
model and br 45 for the push type mower per unit.
Required:
1. a. To determine how many units of each type of mower to produce so as to
maximize profit.
b. Let X1 be push type mower
X2 be self propelled mower

72
 c. Determine the objective function
Z max = 45X1 + 70 X2
d. Identify constraints
9X1 + 12X2 720 minutes ……assembly time
2X1 + 6X2 300 minutes ……..packing time
X1 + X2 75 engine ………….Engines
X1, X2 0
In summary
Z max = 45X1 + 70X2
S.t. 9X1 + 12X2 720
2X1 + 6X2 300
X1 + 2 75
X1, X2 0
2. a. Write the Lpm in a standard form
Z max = 45X1 + 70X2 + 0S1 + 0S2 + 0S
S.T. 9X1 + 12X2 + S1 = 720
2X1 + 6X2 + S2 = 300
X1 + X2 + S3 = 75
X1 X2, S1, S2, S3 0
b. Develop the initial tableau
Solution C 45 70 0 0 0 RHSV
basis X1 X2 S1 S2 S3
Qij = Bi/aij
S1 0 9 12 1 0 0 720
720/12 = 60
S2 0 2 6 0 1 0 300
300/6 = 50 – Leaving
S3 0 1 1 0 0 1 75 75/1 = 75
Z 0 0 0 0 0 0
C-Z 45 70 0 0 0

entering

c. Develop the subsequent tableaus

1/6R2, - 1R2new + R3, -12R2new + R1

73
 C 45 70 0 0 0
Solution Basis X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 RHSV
S1 0 5 0 1 -2 0 120
X2 70 1/3 1 0 1/6 0 50
S3 0 2/3 0 0 -1/6 1 25
Z 70/30 70 0 70/6 0 3500
C-Z 65/3 0 0 -70/6 0

Entering
1/5R1, -1/3 R1new + R2old, -2/3R, New + R3 old
C 45 70 0 0 0 Optimal solution
Solution Basis X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 RHSV X1 = 24units

X1 45 1 0 1/5 -2/5 0 24 X2 = 42units

S1 = 0
X2 70 0 1 -1/15 3/10 0 42
S2 = 0
S3 0 0 0 -2/15 1/10 1 9
S3 = 9 engine
Z 45 70 13/3 3 0 4020 Z = 4020
C-Z 0 0 -13/3 -3 0

9X1 + 12X2 = 720 2X1 + 6X2 = 300 X1 + X2 = 75

X1 0 80 X1 0 150 X1 0 75
X2 60 0 X2 50 0 X2 75 0

74
 X2
120
9X1 + 12X2 = 720
100 2X1 + 6S2 = 300
9(150 – 3X2) + 12X2 = 720
80 1450 – 27X2 + 12X2 = 720
730 = 15X2
X2 = 730/15
60 9X1 = 720 – 4 (730/3)
9X1 + 12X2 = 720
E
40
D
20
C 2X1 + 6X2 = 300

0 20 40 60 B 80 100 120 140 X1

A

Coordinates How determinable? Profit

Points X1 X2 45X1 + 70X2
A 0 0 observation 45(0) + 70(0) = 0
B 75 0 observation 45(75) + 70(0) = 3375
C 60 15 simultaneous 45(60) + 70 (15) = 3750
D 24 42 simultaneous 45 (24) + 70 (42) = 4020
E 0 50 observation 45(0) + 70 (50) = 3500

X1 = 24 b) 2 (24) + 6 (42) =300

X2 = 42
Z = br. 4020 c) 24 + 42 = 75
66
Constraints
a) (24) + 12(42) = 720 75 – 66 = 9
S3 = 9

Interpretation. The company is advised to produce 24 units of push type mower and 40
units of self-propelled mowers so as to realize a profit of Br. 4020. in doing so, the
company would be left with unused resource of engine which can be used for other
purposes.

75
Exercises
1. firm manufactures three products which must be processed through some of or all
four departments. The table below indicates the number of hours a unit of each
product requires in the different departments and the number of pounds of raw
materials required. Also listed are the cost per unit, selling price, and weekly
capacities of both work-hours and raw materials. If the objective is to maximize
total weekly profit, formulate the linear programming model. (Only the model)

Weekly
Product A Product B Product C Availability
Department 1 3 4 2 120 hours
Department 2 2 2 100 hours
Department 3 4 1 80 hours
Department 4 2 3 6 150 hours
Pounds of raw 5 4 3 250 pounds
Material per
unit
Selling price $ 50 $ 60 $ 65
Cost / unit 41 40 43

2. Solve the following linear programming problem

(a) (Use simplex method)

Z max. 40X1 + 32X2

Subject to
40X1 + 20X2  600
4X1 + 10X2  100
2X1 + 3X2  38
X1, X2 0

(b) C min. : 50X1 + 80X2

76
 Subject to
20X1 + 30X2 1400
10X1 + 40X2 1200
X1 , X2  0
(Use the graphic method)

(c) Z max: X1 + 1.2X2 + 2X3

Subject to
X1 + 2X2  150
X1 + 2X3  150
2X1 + X2  80
2X1 + 3X2 + X3  225
X1X2X3  0
(Use the simplex method)

Solutions

(1) * Problem: Determine the number of three products (A, B, & C) that must be
produced and sold in order to maximize the total weekly profit of the firm,
given the different limiting factors.

* Let, X1 = the number of product A, that must be produced & sold

X2 = the number of product B, that must be produced & sold
X3 = the number of product C, that must be produced & sold

* Objective function:
function: profit maximization
Z max = 9X1 + 20X2 + 22X3

* Constraints:
 Production time constraints: 3X1 + 4X2 + 2X3  120
 Production time constraints 2X2 + 2X3  100
 Production time constraints 4X1 + X2  80
 Production time constraints 2X1 + 3X2 + 6X3  150

77
  Raw material constraints: 5X1 + 4X2 + 3X3  250

* Non-negative restrictions: X1, X2, X3 0

 Therefore, Z max: 9X1 + 20X2 + 22X3
Subject to:
3X1+ 4X2+2X3  120
2X2 + 2X3  100
4X1 + X2  80
2X1 + 3X2 + 6X3  150
5X1 + 4X3 +3X3  250
X1, X2, X3  0

(2) a. * Problem:
Problem: determining the number of bentwood rocking chairs and bentwood
coffee tables that must be manufactured in order to maximize the total profit,
given the different limiting factors.

* Let, X1 = the number of bentwood rocking chairs that must be manufactured &
sold
X2 = the number of bentwood coffee tables that must be manufactured &
sold
* Objective function:
function: profit maximization
Z max = 40X1 + 32X2
* Constraints
 Raw material const. (Rosewood): 40X1 + 20X2  600
 Wood working hour const. 4X1 + 10X2  100
 Finishing hour constraint 2X1 + 3X2  38

* Non-negative restrictions:
restrictions: X1, X2  0
 Therefore, Z max = 40X1 + 32X2
Subject to:
40X1 + 20X2  600
4X1 + 10X2 100

78
 2X1 + 3X2  38
X1 , X2  0

Standard form
Z max = 40X1 + 32X2 + OS1 + OS2 + OS3
Subject to:
40X1 + 20X2 + S1 = 600
4X1 + 10X2 + S2 = 100
2X1 + 3X2 + S3 = 38
X1 , X2 ,S1 , S2, S3, 0

Initial Table

Soln. Cj 40 32 0 0 0 Quantity
bases X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 (RHSV) Q/X1
S1 0 40 20 1 0 0 600 15
S2 0 4 10 0 1 0 100 25
S3 0 2 3 0 0 1 38 19
Zj 0 0 0 0 0 0
j = Cj – Zj 40 32 0 0 0
1/40 R1 / -4R1 new + R2 old / / -2R1 new + R3 old

Soln. Cj 40 32 0 0 0 quantity
bases X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 (RHSV) Q/X2
X1 40 1 ½ 1/40 0 0 15 30
S2 0 0 8 –1/10 1 0 40 5
S3 0 0 2 –1/20 0 1 8 4
Zj 40 20 1 0 0 600
j =Cj- Zj 0 12 –1 0 0
1/2 R3 / -1/2R3 new + R1 old / -8R3 new + R3 old

79
 Soln. Cj 40 32 0 0 0 (Quantiy)
bases X1 X2 S1 S2 S3 (RHSV)
X1 40 1 0 3/80 0 –1/4 13
S2 0 0 0 1/10 1 –4 8
X2 32 0 1 –1/40 0 ½ 4
Zj 40 32 7/10 0 6 648
j = cj –zj 0 0 –7/10 0 –6
 Since, the numbers in j = cj – zj row are all 0 & Negative it shows that this solution
is optimal solution.
X1 = 13 , X2 = 4,
4, S2 = 8 (unused) hours Z max = $ 648

 Proof for Question No. 2 by Graphic Method

* 40X1 + 20X2 = 600 X1 0 15
X2 30 0

* 4X1 + 10X2 = 100 X1 0 25

X2 10 0

* 2X1 + 3X2 = 38 X1 0 19
X2 12.7 0

80
 40X1 + 20X2 = 600

30 (0, 30)

25

20

2X1 + 3X2 = 38 15
(0, 12.7)
4X1 + 10X1 = 100

10 B (4, 10)
C

5
D
(0, 0)
A E(15, 0) (19, 0) (25, 0) X1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

C.P X1 X2 Value of O.F

40X1 + 32X2
A 0 0 Observation 0
B 6 10 Observation 320
C 10 6 Elimination 592
D 13 4 Elimination 648 *
E 15 0 Observation 600

* Point C

81
 4X1 + 10X2 = 100
-2 2X1 + 3X2 = 38
4X1 + 10X2 = 100
-4X1 – 6X2 = -76
4X2 = 24
4 4
X2 = 6
4X1 + 10(6) = 100
4X1 + 60 = 100
4X1 = 100 – 60
4X1 – 40
4 4 X1 = 10

Point D
40X1 + 20X2 = 600 40X1 + 20 (4) = 600
-20 2X1 + 3X2 = 38 40X1 + 80 = 600
40X1 + 20X2 = 600 40X1 = 600 - 80
-40X1 – 60X2 = -760 40X1 = 520
-40X2 = -160 40 40
-40 –40 X1 = 13
X2 = 4

Interpretation
It is advisable for the company to produce 13 units of bentwood rocking chairs and 4
units coffee tables and maximize its profit to birr 648, by doing so the company may be
left with 8 unused wood working hours, therefore, the company can use these unused
hours for other purposes.

(b) * Problem:
Problem: determine the number of two types of that must be produced by the two
machines (M I & M II) in order to minimize costs of operating the machines.

* Let X1 = the number of tiers that must be produced by M I

X2 = the number of tiers that must be produced by M II

82
 * Objective function : cost Minimization
Z min = 50X1 + 80X2
* Constraints:
 Grade A tiers constraints: 20X1 + 30X2 1,400
 Grade B tiers constraints :10X1 + 40X2  1,200

* Non-negative restrictions X1 , X2  0
 Therefore, Z min = 50X1 + 80X2
Subject to:
20X1 + 30X2 1,400
10X1 + 40X2 1,200
X1, X2  0
 Solution for Question No. 3 Graphic Method
* 20X1 + 30X2 = 1,400
X1 0 70
X2 46 – 7 0

* 10X1 + 40X2 = 1,200

X1 0 120
X2 30 0

20X1 + 30X2 = 1400 X2

83
 60

50 (0, 46.7)

40

10X1 + 40X2 - 120030

20 B (?)

10

0 (70,0) C (120,0) X1

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Corner X1 X2 How Value of objective

points F: 50X1 + 80X2
A 0 46.7 Obser. 3736
B 40 20 Elimin. 3600 *
C 120 0 Obser. 6000

* Point B

84
 20X1 + 30X2 = 1400  in order to Minimize
-2 10X1 + 40X2 = 1200 costs of operating the Machines
20X1 + 30X2 = 1400 M I  Has to produce 40 tires
-20X1 + 80X2 = -2400 M II  has to produce 20 tires
-50X2 = -1000 Z min = 3600
50 50
X2 = 20

10X1 + 40 (20 = 1200

10X1 + 800 = 1200
10X1 = 1200 – 800
10 ½ R2 / -R2new + R4 old

Soln Cj 1 1.2 2 0 0 0 0 Quantity Q/x2

bases X1 X2 X3 S1 S2 S3 S4 (RHSV)
S1 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 150 75
X3 2 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 75 75
S3 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 80 80
S4 0 3/2 3 0 0 -1/2 0 1 150 225 50
Zj 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 150
j = Cj - Zj 0 1.2 0 0 -1 0 0

1/3 R4 / -R4 New + R3 old / -2R4 new + R1 old

Sol n
Cj 1 1.2 2 0 0 0 0 Quantity
bases X1 X2 X3 S1 S2 S3 S4 (RHSV)

85
S1 0 0 0 0 1 1/3 0 -2/3 150
X3 2 ½ 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 75
S3 0 1 0 0 0 1/6 1 -1/3 30
X2 1.2 1/2 1 0 0 -1/6 0 1/3 50
Zj 1.6 1.2 2 0 0.8 0 0.4 210
j = Cj - Zj -0.6 0 0 0 -0.8 0 -0.4

 since there is no positive number in Aj = Cj – Z raw we can suggest that we

reach the optimum solution therefore, X2 = 50
X3 = 75
S1 = 50
S3 = 30
and Zj = 210

86